id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
azojete-679	Obi, P. I. ; Oputa, O.; Amako, E. A.	Optimal Load Scheduling of Power Plants in a Grid Considering the Plant’s Capacity and Line Losses	2022	14	.pdf	application/pdf	6249	276	45	Table 6: Lost coefficient of the system under analysis Line Coefficient Value (× 10−6𝑀𝑊−1 Line Coefficient Value (× 10−6𝑀𝑊−1) 𝐵11 1.46 𝐵22 2.17 𝐵33 1.15 𝐵44 1.73 𝐵55 2.22 𝐵66 2.68 𝐵77 1.99 𝐵88 2.73 𝐵99 1.68 Then the simplest power loss for the system as given in Equation (29); 𝑃𝐿 = 0.0146 ( 𝑃𝐺1 100 ) 2 + 0.0217 ( 𝑃𝐺2 100 ) 2 + 0.0115 ( 𝑃𝐺3 100 ) 2 + 0.0173 ( 𝑃𝐺4 100 ) 2 + 0.0222 ( 𝑃𝐺5 100 ) 2 + 0.0268 ( 𝑃𝐺6 100 ) 2 + 0.0199 ( 𝑃𝐺7 100 ) 2 + 0.0273 ( 𝑃𝐺8 100 ) 2 + 0.0168 ( 𝑃𝐺9 100 ) 2 (32) Starting with 𝜆1 as 400.0, the values for 𝑃𝐺1 1 , 𝑃𝐺2 1 , … . , 𝑃𝐺9 1 from Equation (30), and 𝑃𝐿 from Equation (32) were computed by a program developed in MATLAB and the results are as presented in Table 7 in MW (where 𝑃𝐺1 1 , 𝑃𝐺2 1 , … . , 𝑃𝐺9 1 are in the order as presented in the Table 5 listing the power plants, i.e 𝑃𝐺1 1 power generated by Aba power station, 𝑃𝐺2 1 is the power generated from Afam I – V Power Station and so on) Table 7: Power plant generating power after 1st iteration Plant generation Value (MW) Plant generation Value (MW) Plant generation Value (MW) 𝑃𝐺1 1 158.6728 𝑃𝐺2 1 213.6828 𝑃𝐺3 1 195.9099 𝑃𝐺4 1 178.9783 𝑃𝐺5 1 195.8261 𝑃𝐺6 1 160.2735 𝑃𝐺7 1 151.8301 𝑃𝐺8 1 217.5139 𝑃𝐺9 1 177.1645 𝑃𝐿 1 0.7215 http://www.azojete.com.ng/ mailto:patndyobi@gmail.com http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aba_Power_Station&action=edit&redlink=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Afam_IV-V_Power_Station&action=edit&redlink=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Afam_VI_Power_Station&action=edit&redlink=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alaoji_Power_Station&action=edit&redlink=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alaoji_Power_Station&action=edit&redlink=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Okpai_Power_Station&action=edit&redlink=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Omoku_Power_Station&action=edit&redlink=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sapele_Power_Station&action=edit&redlink=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sapele_Power_Station&action=edit&redlink=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sapele_Power_Station&action=edit&redlink=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Delta_-_Ughelli_Power_Station&action=edit&redlink=1 Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment, December, 2022; Vol. 18(4):669-682 ISSN 1596-2644; e-ISSN 2545-5818; www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: patndyobi@gmail.com 678 Total power 2,170 MW Real power difference from the 1st iteration is therefore ∆𝑃1 = 2170 = 𝜆1 + 124.305 = 524.305 Repeating the process for the second iteration (using 𝜆2 = 524.305 ) gives the results displayed in Table 8 Table 8: Power plant generating power after 2nd iteration Plant generation Value (MW) Plant generation Value (MW) Plant generation Value (MW) 𝑃𝐺1 2 210.4095 𝑃𝐺2 2 283.5900 𝑃𝐺3 2 257.9969 𝑃𝐺4 2 235.3991 𝑃𝐺5 2 258.8524 𝑃𝐺6 2 211.9622 𝑃𝐺7 2 199.6725 𝑃𝐺8 2 287.3723 𝑃𝐺9 2 234.5880 𝑃𝐿 1 0.8632 Real power difference from the 2nd iteration is therefore ∆𝑃2 = 2170	cache/azojete-679.pdf	txt/azojete-679.txt