ARID ZONE JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT AZOJETE December 2020. Vol. 16(4):821-832 Published by the Faculty of Engineering, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria. Print ISSN: 1596-2490, Electronic ISSN: 2545-5818 www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 821 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE FIVE-FACTOR RESPONSE SURFACE OPTIMISATION OF HYDROCHLORIC ACID DISSOLUTION OF ALUMINA FROM A NIGERIAN CLAY H. O. Orugba1, O. D. Onukwuli2, A. K. Babayemi3 and J. C. Umezuegbu3 1Delta State University, Abraka Nigeria, Department of Chemical Engineering 2Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka Nigeria, Department of Chemical Engineering 3Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Uli, Nigeria, Department of Chemical Engineering *Corresponding author’s email address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 1.0 Introduction Aluminum is in high demand all over the world today due to some of its unique properties like hardness, strength and electrical conductivity making it extremely useful in so many engineering applications like electric power transmission (Olaremu, 2005). The expanded usage of the metal coupled with its ore depletion resulting from the increased mining of bauxite which is the most important ore from which aluminum is produced (Hosseini et al., 2011) is responsible for the high cost of the metal. For a continuous supply of the metal, there is need to explore alternative materials from which it can be produced (Al-Zahrani and Abdel-Majid, 2009; Orugba et al., 2020). Many Nigerian clays have been identified to be very rich in alumina content (Ogbuagu, et al., 2010; Ajemba and Onukwuli, 2012; Ajemba et al., 2012; Orugba et al., 2014; Udochukwu et al., 2020). Different methods have been adopted by researchers over the years to recover alumina from clays of which acid leaching has been an outstanding method (Al- Zahrani and Abdel-Majid, 2009). In the dissolution of alumina from the clays using acids or alkalis, it is important to investigate the process parameters in order to obtain their optimum conditions to enhance efficient recovery, in which case, the optimization of the dissolution process becomes very important. In order to determine the most appropriate values of process variables, optimization is very important. In a leaching process, the calcination temperature, leaching temperature, stirring speed, acid concentration and liquid-solid ratio have been identified as important parameters that control the yield of alumina from clays (Orugba et al., 2014, 2020). The chief aim in any optimization process is to obtain the minimum value or maximum value of a function depending on the circumstances. The need to search for the economic conditions of process variables is paramount because apart from cost reduction, certain process variables if not properly controlled can increase waste generation into the ecosystem. For example, the energy needed in the heat activation step is obtained from burning ARTICLE INFORMATION ABSTRACT The major challenge encountered in the process of making the acid dissolution of alumina from clays economically viable is the determination of the optimum conditions of the key process variables in order to enhance efficient recovery. High alumina recovery from clays can be achieved by determining the optimum conditions of the process variables during optimization. In this research, using the experimental design, the combined effects of five independent variables (calcination temperature, leaching temperature, acid concentration, stirring speed and liquid/solid ratio) on the yield of alumina from the local clay was studied and the second order polynomial regression equation was developed to evaluate the influence of the five independent variables on alumina yield. Model adequacy test was performed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and 0.9209 was obtained as the correlation value between the experimental responses and the predicted responses. The optimum yield of alumina was obtained as 80.07% at 677.27°C heat of activation; 65.18°C leaching temperature; 1.9mol/cm3HCl concentration; 10.36 liquid-solid weight ratio and 442.92rpm stirring speed. © 2020 Faculty of Engineering, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria. All rights reserved. Submitted 9 September, 2020 Revised 17 November, 2020 Accepted 21 November, 2020 Keywords: Clay Leaching Alumina Optimization hydrochloric acid http://www.azojete.com.ng Orugba et al: Five-Factor Response Surface Optimisation of Hydrochloric Acid Dissolution of Alumina from a Nigerian Clay. AZOJETE,16(4):821-832. ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545-5818, www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 822 of petroleum-based fuels which increases green house gases generation into the atmosphere posing risks to the environment (Orugba et al., 2019a, 2019b). In the chemical and process industry, the response surface methodology (RSM) has been employed for the purpose of either obtaining higher-value products or operating the process in a cost effective way and ensuring the process operates in a more reliable and stable way (Alam et al., 2007; Gunawan and Suhendra, 2008; Narayana et al., 2011; Sudamalla et al., 2012). Ajemba et al., (2012) performed the optimization of alumina dissolution from Ukpor clay in tetra-oxosulphate (vi) acid using the response surface methodology and obtained an optimum yield of 97.23% at the leaching conditions of calcination temperature of 729.54°C; leaching temperature of 103.25°C; acid concentration of 2.93mol/l; solid/liquid ratio of 0.027g/ml and stirring speed of 436.34 rpm. Orugba et al., (2014) studied the process modeling of sulphuric acid leaching of iron from a local Nigerian clay using the response surface methodology and obtained the iron yield of 84.7% at calcinations temperature of 650°C; leaching temperature of 70.02°C; acid concentration of 1.89mol/cm3; liquid-solid ratio of 10.67 and stirring speed of 379.80rpm. Ohale et al., (2017) used Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Response Surface Methodology based on a 25-1 fractional factorial design as tools for simulation and optimization of the dissolution process for a Nigerian local clay and obtained an optimal response of 81.45% yield of alumina at 4.6 M sulphuric acid concentration, 214 min leaching time, 0.085 g/ml dosage and 214 rpm stirring speed. Onukwuli et al., (2018) performed the process optimization of hydrochloric acid leaching of iron from Agbaja clay using the response surface methodology and obtained iron yield of 85.13 % at calcinations temperature of 800°C, leaching temperature of 53.7°C, HCl concentration of 2.34 mol/cm3, liquid to solid ratio of 9.90cm3/g and stirring speed of 250 rpm. Every clay has its unique properties and responds to different leaching conditions in different ways hence the conditions that produce optimum ore yield for a particular clay may not produce same result for another clay sample. Therefore, generalizing leaching conditions for all clays is highly discouraged. The local clay studied in this work has not been studied extensively hence performing the optimization of its leaching process is important so as to obtain the values of process variables that guarantee optimum alumina yield. The response surface methodology (RSM) was used in the optimization study due to its robustness (Raissi and Farsani, 2009) while HCl was considered as the solvent because it is cheap and previous researches have recorded significant alumina yield with HCl (Al-Zahrani and Abdel-Majid, 2009). The aim of this research work is to investigate the influence of five process variables as well as their possible interactions on alumina yield from the local clay using hydrochloric acid so as to obtain their optimum conditions that guarantee maximum alumina yield. Using the response surface methodology, a suitable predictive model will be obtained for the dissolution process from the data obtained from few experiments through regression analysis. 2.0 Materials and Methods 2.1 Material preparation and leaching experiments The local clay was obtained from Ozoro (6.24°N, 5.55°E) in Delta State Nigeria. The characterization of this clay by Orugba et al., (2014) and Orugba et al., (2020) revealed that the local clay has 33.90% of alumina making it a very viable source of the ore. The clay was soaked in water for two days in order to ease the removal of debris and stony materials. The dissolved clay was properly sieved and sun-dried for 24 hours then oven-dried at 60°C for 18 hours to aggregate the particles. The clay samples were subjected to heat activation in a muffle furnace at different temperatures ranging from 400°C to 900°C for a period of 1hr in order to study the influence of temperature of activation on alumina yield (Al-Zahrani and Abdel-Majid, 2003). The activated clay samples were ground to the same particle size of 0.045mm to increase the surface areas of the particles (Ozdemir and Cetisli, 2005). The prepared sample clay were properly labeled and subjected to leaching experiments. For each leaching experiment, 20g of http://www.azojete.com.ng Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment, December, 2020; Vol. 16(4):821-832. ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545- 5818; www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 823 the activated clay was weighed into an already determined volume of the acid and heated in a round bottom flask for a period of 30minutes based on the conditions in the experimental design matrix shown in Table 1. At the end of the period, 2ml of each sample was collected and analyzed for alumina ion using the Atomic Adsorption Spectra (AAS) (Al-Zahrani and Abdel- Majid, 2003; Orugba et al., 2014). 2.2 Design of Experiment The experimental design matrix was carried out using the central composite rotatable design of the Design Expert. Five independent variables (calcinations temperature, leaching temperature, acid concentration, liquid-solid ratio and stirring speed) were investigated at five levels and a total of 50 experiments were obtained from the design using the central composite rotatable design of 25 = 32 plus six centre points and (2 x 6 = 12) star points The yield of alumina from the ore was optimized using the Response Surface Methodology. Calcination temperature was varied from 400°C - 900°C, leaching temperature from 45°C - 85°C, acid concentration from 0.5mol/cm3 - 3mol/cm3, liquid-solid ratio from 4cm3/g - 16cm3/g and stirring speed from 90rpm- 720rpm. The experimental matrix as well as alumina yield is presented in Table 1. 2.3 Statistical Analysis The statistical analysis of the result was performed using Design expert software (Version V10) and a second order polynomial equation that represents the response (alumina yield) as a function of the five independent variables was developed based on Equation (1). y = b0 + i=1 k bixi� + i=1 k biixi 2� + i=1 k bijxi� xj 1 The alumina yield being the response is represented by y, b0 is the response of the central point, while the main effects and the interactions of the variables xi on the response y are measured by the other terms. The number of factors is represented by k while the independent variables under study are represented by xi and xj. The model adequacy was tested using the Analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on F-test. 3.0 Results and Discussion 3.1 Generation of the regression model equation The influence of the interactions of the five independent variables on the yield of alumina from the local clay was investigated from the design matrix presented in Table 1. Table 1: Experimental matrix and alumina yield Std. order Calcinations temp (°C) X1 Leaching temp (°C) X2 Acid conc. (mol/cm3) X3 Liquid/solid ratio (cm3/g) X4 Stirring speed (rpm) X5 Yield (%) Exp. Value Pred. value 1 400 45 0.5 4 90 39.8 46.0 2 850 45 0.5 4 90 59.5 56.6 3 400 90 0.5 4 90 57.6 56.5 4 850 90 0.5 4 90 66.1 64.9 5 400 45 3 4 90 54.9 56.9 6 850 45 3 4 90 67.3 64.4 7 400 90 3 4 90 66.5 63.8 8 850 90 3 4 90 70.1 69.1 9 400 45 0.5 16 90 58.2 55.3 10 850 45 0.5 16 90 64.9 64.8 11 400 90 0.5 16 90 57.8 62.3 12 850 90 0.5 16 90 72.4 69.7 13 400 45 3 16 90 67.9 66.9 14 850 45 3 16 90 71.2 73.4 15 400 90 3 16 90 73.2 70.3 file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/azojete143/www.azojete.com.ng Orugba et al: Five-Factor Response Surface Optimisation of Hydrochloric Acid Dissolution of Alumina from a Nigerian Clay. AZOJETE,16(4):821-832. ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545-5818, www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 824 16 850 90 3 16 90 73.5 74.6 17 400 45 0.5 4 720 47.3 49.1 18 850 45 0.5 4 720 58.6 58.4 19 400 90 0.5 4 720 61.2 56.9 20 850 90 0.5 4 720 63.9 63.9 21 400 45 3 4 720 62.9 58.3 22 850 45 3 4 720 64.9 64.6 23 400 90 3 4 720 59.2 62.4 24 850 90 3 4 720 66.9 66.4 25 400 45 0.5 16 720 52.8 50.1 26 850 45 0.5 16 720 55.2 58.4 27 400 90 0.5 16 720 51.9 54.4 28 850 90 0.5 16 720 62.3 60.5 29 400 45 3 16 720 54.2 60.1 30 850 45 3 16 720 69.3 65.4 31 400 90 3 16 720 61.7 60.7 32 850 90 3 16 720 69.2 63.8 33 89.9 67.5 1.75 10 405 57.4 54.5 34 1160 67.5 1.75 10 405 65.3 70.6 35 625 13.9 1.75 10 405 54.8 53.2 36 625 121 1.75 10 405 59.9 63.8 37 625 67.5 -1.22 10 405 51.3 50.4 38 625 67.5 4.72 10 405 63.9 67.2 39 625 67.5 1.75 -4.27 405 49.9 51.8 40 625 67.5 1.75 24.27 405 59.1 59.6 41 625 67.5 1.75 10 -344 64.3 64.9 42 625 67.5 1.75 10 1154 53.9 55.7 43 625 67.5 1.75 10 405 78.8 79.6 44 625 67.5 1.75 10 405 79.3 79.6 45 625 67.5 1.75 10 405 79.4 79.6 46 625 67.5 1.75 10 405 79 79.6 47 625 67.5 1.75 10 405 79 79.6 48 625 67.5 1.75 10 405 79.4 79.6 49 625 67.5 1.75 10 405 80 79.6 50 625 67.5 1.75 10 405 80 79.6 The technique of the central composite design was employed to generate a polynomial regression equation that shows the relationship that exists between the dependent variable (alumina yield) and the five independent variables (calcination temperature, leaching temperature, stirring speed, acid concentration and liquid-solid ratio) as shown in Equation (2). YAl2O3 = 79.56 + 3.39X1 + 2.23X2 + 3.54X3 + 1.64X4 − 1.94X5– 0.55X1X2 − 0.76X1X3 – 0.24X1X4 – 0.31X1X5 − 0.91X2X3 – 0.87X2 – 0.70X2X5 + 0.91X3X4 − 0.41X3X5 – 2.05X4X5 – 3.01X1 2– 3.72X2 2 − 3.67X3 2 − 4.22X4 2 − 3.41X5 2 2 3.2 Model adequacy test In order to account for the adequacy of the model equation obtained, a model adequacy test using the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed as summarized in Table 2. The F-value and the p-value were used to evaluate the adequacy of the model because from statistical tests, the smaller the p-value and the larger the F-value, the higher the accuracy of the model (Rashid et al., 2011). http://www.azojete.com.ng Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment, December, 2020; Vol. 16(4):821-832. ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545- 5818; www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 825 Table 2: The summary of the model adequacy test Source Sum of squares Degree of freedom Mean squares F-value P-value Remarks Sequential sum of squares Linear 1537.326 5 307.4652 4.484532 0.0022 Significant 2FI 241.09 10 24.109 0.295325 0.9776 Not significant Quadratic 2415.38 5 483.0759 38.89003 < 0.0001 Significant Cubic 239.5728 15 15.97152 1.853254 0.1282 Not significant Source Std Dev. R2 Adjusted R2 Predicted R2 PRESS Remarks Model summary statistics Linear 8.280173 0.337575 0.2623 0.232841 3493.658 Inadequate 2FI 9.035235 0.390515 0.121625 0.130424 3960.068 Inadequate Quadratic 3.524428 0.920899 0.866347 0.708686 1326.65 Adequate Cubic 2.935659 0.973506 0.907272 -0.22017 5556.674 Inadequate When the p-value is less than 0.01, the model is highly significant, when the p-value lies between 0.01 and 0.05, it is significant but if it is greater than 0.05, it is not significant (Rashid et al., 2011). From the F-values of the different models presented in Table 3, it could be seen that the quadratic model with the highest F-value of 38.89 and with a p-value less than 0.0001adequately fits the experimental data. The significant terms of the model equation generated in Equation (2) were selected based on their F and p-values as shown in Table 3. Table 3: ANOVA for Response Surface Quadratic Model Source Sum of squares Degree of freedom F-value P-value (prod.>F) Model 4193.796 20 16.88107 < 0.0001 X1 498.8237 1 40.1578 < 0.0001 X2 216.0211 1 17.39078 0.0003 X3 543.0555 1 43.71868 < 0.0001 X4 115.995 1 9.338178 0.0048 X5 163.4306 1 13.15698 0.0011 X1X2 9.68 1 0.779288 0.3846 X1X3 18.605 1 1.497795 0.2309 X1X4 1.805 1 0.145312 0.7058 X1X5 3.125 1 0.251578 0.6198 X2X3 26.645 1 2.145056 0.1538 X2X4 24.5 1 1.972372 0.1708 X2X5 15.68 1 1.262318 0.2704 X3X4 1.125 1 0.090568 0.7656 X3X5 5.445 1 0.43835 0.5131 X4X5 134.48 1 10.82631 0.0026 X12 503.2336 1 40.51281 < 0.0001 X22 767.5096 1 61.78836 < 0.0001 X32 749.3644 1 60.32757 < 0.0001 X42 989.7077 1 79.67641 < 0.0001 X52 645.0513 1 51.92985 < 0.0001 Residual 360.2261 29 Lack of Fit 358.8274 22 81.62455 < 0.0001 Pure Error 1.39875 7 Cor Total 4554.022 49 file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/azojete143/www.azojete.com.ng Orugba et al: Five-Factor Response Surface Optimisation of Hydrochloric Acid Dissolution of Alumina from a Nigerian Clay. AZOJETE,16(4):821-832. ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545-5818, www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 826 The significance of each term of the model equation is judged based on its p-value as shown in Table 3. It could be revealed that the linear effects of all the independent variables (X1, X2, X3, X4, and X5) as well as their quadratic effects (X12, X22, X32, X42, and X52) are highly significant on the yield of alumina while their interactions are not significant. When only the significant terms in Equation (2) are considered, a final model equation was obtained as presented in Equation (3). YAl2O3 = 79.56 + 3.39X1 + 2.23X2 + 3.54X3 + 1.64X4 − 1.94X5– 2.05X4X5 – 3.01X1 2– 3.72X2 2 − 3.67X3 2 − 4.22X4 2 − 3.41X5 2 (3) The summary of the regression values of the final model equation is presented in Table 4. Table 4: Summary of regression values Item value Std. dev. 3.52 Mean 63.94 C.V% 5.51 PRESS 1326.65 R-squared 0.9209 Adj. R-squared 0.8863 Pre-R-squared 0.7087 Adeq precision 14.672 From Table 4, with the coefficient of variation value of 5.51%, the model can be considered reasonably reproducible. The signal to noise ratio which is given as the value of the adequacy precision is 14.672 indicates that an adequate relationship of signal to noise ratio exists. Internally Studentized Residuals Nor ma l % Pro bab ility Normal Plot of Residuals -3.00 -2.00 -1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1 5 10 20 30 50 70 80 90 95 99 Figure 1: Plot of Normal probability against Studentized residual http://www.azojete.com.ng Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment, December, 2020; Vol. 16(4):821-832. ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545- 5818; www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 827 22 2 Actual Pre dict ed Predicted vs. Actual 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 Figure 2: Plot of predicted yield values against actual yield values The plot of Normal probability against Studentized residual given in Figure 1 and the plot of predicted yield values against actual yield values presented in Figure 2 revealed that a reasonable agreement exists between the actual and predicted alumina yield. 3.3 Response surface plots for the acid-dissolution of alumina In order to study the combined effects of process variables on the yield of the ore, 3D response plot of any two independent variables is plotted while keeping another variable at its centre level as shown in Figures 3-12. Figure 3 shows the variation of alumina yield with calcination temperature and leaching temperature. At low calcination temperatures and low leaching temperatures, very low alumina yield was recorded but as calcination temperature and leaching temperature increased, alumina yield increased. However, when calcination temperature was increased beyond 750°C, there was a decline in alumina yield. The decreased alumina yield at elevated calcination temperature could be due to the clay solid phase transformation and total dehydration (Al-Zahrani and Abdel-Majid, 2009) The influence of acid concentration and calcination temperature on alumina yield is presented in Figure 4. From the figure, alumina yield increased with increase acid concentration and calcination temperature. Maximum alumina yield was obtained at the highest acid concentration of 3mol/cm3. The increased alumina yield with acid concentration could be due to the presence of more hydroxonium ions which increase leaching ability of the solvent (Poppleton and Sawyer, 1977) The combined effect of liquid/solid ratio and calcination temperature on alumina yield is shown in Figure 5. As can be seen in the figure, high alumina yields were recorded with increased liquid/solid ratio and calcination temperature. Increased liquid/solid ratio makes more solvent available for proper dissolution of the ore and this enhances higher leaching rates (Ozdemir and Cetisli, 2005). Figure 6 shows the influence of stirring speed and calcination temperature on alumina yield. From the figure, the yield of alumina increased as stirring speed and calcination temperature were increased. The lowest alumina yield was recorded at the lowest stirring speed of 90rpm and at the lowest calcination temperature of 400°C. As stirring speed increased, there is increased contact between the solid particles and the solvent which enhances ore dissolution (Orugba et al., 2014). file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/azojete143/www.azojete.com.ng Orugba et al: Five-Factor Response Surface Optimisation of Hydrochloric Acid Dissolution of Alumina from a Nigerian Clay. AZOJETE,16(4):821-832. ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545-5818, www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 828 The combined influence of acid concentration and leaching temperature on alumina yield is presented in Figure 7. As shown in the figure, alumina yield increased as acid concentration and leaching temperature were increased. Higher acid concentrations means more solvent ions are made available for dissolution and this enhances dissolution rate. Also, high leaching temperatures increased the kinetic energy of the reacting species which also increase dissolution rate (Orugba et al., 2014). Figure 8 shows the combined effect of liquid/solid ratio and leaching temperature on alumina yield. As can be seen from the figure, increasing liquid/solid ratio and leaching temperature increased alumina yield as the lowest alumina yield occurred at the lowest stirring speed and leaching temperature. At low leaching temperatures, the kinetic energies of the reacting species are low hence decreased reaction rate but this will increase as the leaching temperature increases. Also, low liquid/solid ratio implies less solvent to dissolve the solid particles hence reduced dissolution. Similar results were recorded by Al-Zahrani and Abdel-Majid, (2003). The combined influence of liquid/solid ratio and acid concentration is shown in Figure 9. As shown in Figure 9, at low liquid/solid ratio and low acid concentration, the alumina yield is low but the yield was seen to increase at higher liquid/solid ratios and acid concentration. Figure 10 shows the combined influence of stirring speed and acid concentration. The yield of alumina increased with increased stirring speed and acid concentration. The highest alumina yield occurred at the highest acid concentration of 3mol/cm3. The combined influence of stirring speed and liquid/solid ratio on alumina yield is presented in Figure 11. As shown in the figure, increasing both the stirring speed and liquid/solid ratio increased alumina yield as the highest alumina yield was obtained at the highest stirring speed and highest liquid/solid ratio. Figure 12 shows the combined influence of stirring speed and leaching temperature on alumina yield. As both stirring speed and leaching temperature increased, alumina yield was also increased. The increased alumina yield with stirring speed is due to the increased contact between solid particles and solvent which enhances dissolution rate while increased leaching temperature increases the kinetic energy of the reacting species which also enhances dissolution rate. 45.00 54.00 63.00 72.00 81.00 90.00 400.00 490.00 580.00 670.00 760.00 850.00 48 50 52 54 56 58 Y ield A: calcination temp. B: Leaching temp 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 400.00 490.00 580.00 670.00 760.00 850.00 65 70 75 80 85 Y iel d A: calcination temp. C: Acid conc. Figure 3: Variation of alumina yield with calcination temperature and leaching temperature Figure 4: Variation of alumina yield with calcination temperature and acid concentration. http://www.azojete.com.ng Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment, December, 2020; Vol. 16(4):821-832. ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545- 5818; www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 829 4.00 7.00 10.00 13.00 16.00 400.00 490.00 580.00 670.00 760.00 850.00 65 70 75 80 85 Y ield A: calcination temp. D: liquid/solid ratio 90.00 180.00 270.00 360.00 450.00 540.00 630.00 720.00 400.00 490.00 580.00 670.00 760.00 850.00 65 70 75 80 85 Y iel d A: calcination temp. E: stirring speed Figure 5: Variation of alumina yield with calcination temperature and liquid-solid ratio Figure 6: Variation of alumina yield with calcination temperature and stirring speed 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 45.00 54.00 63.00 72.00 81.00 90.00 65 70 75 80 85 Y ield B: Leaching temp C: Acid conc. 4.00 7.00 10.00 13.00 16.00 45.00 54.00 63.00 72.00 81.00 90.00 65 70 75 80 85 Y iel d B: Leaching temp D: liquid/solid ratio Figure 7: Variation of alumina yield with leaching temperature and acid concentration Figure 8: Variation of alumina yield with leaching temperature and liquid-solid ratio 4.00 7.00 10.00 13.00 16.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 65 70 75 80 85 Y iel d C: Acid conc. D: liquid/solid ratio 90.00 180.00 270.00 360.00 450.00 540.00 630.00 720.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 65 70 75 80 85 Y ield C: Acid conc. E: stirring speed Figure 9: Variation of alumina yield with acid concentration and stirring speed Figure 10: Variation of alumina yield with acid concentration and stirring speed file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/azojete143/www.azojete.com.ng Orugba et al: Five-Factor Response Surface Optimisation of Hydrochloric Acid Dissolution of Alumina from a Nigerian Clay. AZOJETE,16(4):821-832. ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545-5818, www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 830 90.00 180.00 270.00 360.00 450.00 540.00 630.00 720.00 4.00 7.00 10.00 13.00 16.00 65 70 75 80 85 Y iel d D: liquid/solid ratio E: stirring speed 90.00 180.00 270.00 360.00 450.00 540.00 630.00 720.00 45.00 54.00 63.00 72.00 81.00 90.00 65 70 75 80 85 Y iel d B: Leaching temp E: stirring speed Figure 11: Variation of alumina yield with solid - liquid ratio and stirring speed Figure 12: Variation of alumina yield with leaching temperature and stirring speed 3.4 Predicting the optimum condition of alumina yield In order to further confirm the adequacy of the generated model in predicting the alumina yield, the optimum values of the five independent variables were used to perform a new set of experiments and the result is presented in Table 3. Table 3: Comparing the experimental and predicted alumina yield using the optimum conditions Variable Optimum variables value Alumina yield Experimental Predicted Calcinations temp. (°C) X1 677 80.07 78.91 Leaching temp. (°C) X2 65 - - Acid conc. (mol/cm3) X3 1.9 - - Liquid-solid ratio (cm3/g) X4 10.4 Stirring speed (rpm) X5 442 From the values of alumina yield obtained shown in Table 3, it can be established that a good agreement exists between the predicted alumina yield and the experimental alumina yield at the optimum levels and this confirms the validity of the generated model. 4.0 Conclusion Developing a mathematical relationship to investigate the combined influence of different process variables on alumina yield is important in order to obtain the optimum conditions that guarantee high yield. In this research, a model equation that can be used to study the influence of five process variables on the yield of alumina from the local clay using HCl has been developed. The five process variables considered were calcination temperature, leaching temperature, stirring speed, liquid-solid ratio and acid concentration. Based on experimental design using the central composite design of the response surface methodology, the second- order polynomial regression equation appeared to fit the data most. The optimum alumina yield of 80.07% was obtained at calcinations temperature of 677.27°C; leaching temperature of 65.18°C; acid concentration of 1.9mol/cm3; liquid-solid ratio of 10.36 and stirring speed of 442.92rpm. The correlation between the predicted and experimental responses was obtained as 0.9209. The developed model can guarantee optimal dissolution of the ore from the local clay. References Ajemba, RA. and Onukwuli, OD. 2012. Process Optimization of Sulphuric Acid Leaching of Alumina from Nteje Clayusing Central Composite Rotatable Design. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, 3(5): 116-121. http://www.azojete.com.ng Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment, December, 2020; Vol. 16(4):821-832. ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545- 5818; www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 831 Ajemba, RO., Ugonabo, VI., Okafor, VN. and Onukwuli, OD. 2012. Optimization of Alumina Leaching Conditions from UkporClay in H2SO4 using Response Surface Methodology. American Journal of Scientific Research, 77: 37-48. Alam, MZ., Muyibi, SA. and Toramae, J. 2007. Statistical optimization of adsorption processes for removal of 2, 4-dichlorophenol by activated carbon derived from oil palm empty fruit bunches. Journal of Environmental Sciences China, 19 (6): 674-677. Al-Zahrani, AA. and Abdel-Majid, MH. 2003. Production of Liquid Alum from Local Saudi Clays, Final Report, Project No. 119 / 422, Scientific Research Council, KAU. Al-Zahrani, AA. and Abdel-Majid, MH. 2009. Extraction of alumina from local clays by Hydrochloric AcidProcess. Journal of King Abdulazeez University, Engineering Science, 20(2):29–41. Gunawan, ER. And Suhendra, D.2008. Four-factor Response Surface Optimisation of the Enzymatic Synthesis of Wax Ester from Palm kernel Oil. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 8 (1):83-90. Hosseini, SA., Niaei, A. and Dariush, S.2011. Production of Al2O3 from kaolin. Open Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1: 23–27. Narayana, SKV., King, P., Gopinadh, R. and Sreelakshmi, V. 2011. Response Surface Optimization of dye removal by using waste Prawn shells. International Journal of Chemical Science and Application, 2 (3): 186-193. Ogbemudia, J., Felix, O. and Uzoma, N. 2010. Characterization of Ugbegun Clay deposit for its Potential. International Journal of Chemistry Research, 1(2):231-240. Ohale, PE., Uzoh, CF. and Onukwuli, OD. 2017. Optimal factor evaluation for the dissolution of alumina from Azaraegbelu clay in acid solution using RSM and ANN comparative analysis. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 24:43-54. Olaremu, AG.2015. Sequential Leaching for the Production of Alumina from a Nigerian Clay. International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences, 3(7):103- 109 Onukwuli, OD., Udeigwe, U. and Ude, CN. 2018. Process Optimization of Hydrochloric acid Leaching of iron from Agbaja Clay. Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 53(3): 581- 589. Orugba, HO, Onukwuli, OD., Babayemi, AK. and Umezuegbu JC. 2020. Application of the Shrinking core models to Hydrochloric acid dissolution of Alumina from clay. ABUAD Journal of Engineering Research Development, 3(1): 59-67. Orugba, HO., Ogbeide, SE. and Osagie, C. 2019a. Emission Trading Scheme and the effect of Carbon fee on Petroleum Refineries. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(5): 537-545. Orugba, HO., Ogbeide, SE. and Osagie, C. 2019b. Risk level assessment of the Desalter and Preflash column of a Nigerian Crude distillation unit. Journal of Material Science and Chemical Engineering, 7: 31-41. Orugba, HO., Onukwuli, OD., Njoku, NC., Ojebah, CK. and Nnanwube, IA. 2014. Process Modeling of Sulphuric Acid Leaching of Iron from Ozoro Clay. European Scientific Journal, 10(30): 256-268. Ozdemir, M. and Cetisli, H., "Extraction Kinetics of Alunite in Sulfuric Acid and Hydrochloric Acid", Hydrometallurgy, 76(3-4): 217-224 (2005). Poppleton, HO. and Sawyer, DL. 1977. Hydrochloric Acid Leaching of Calcined Kaolin to Produce Alumina, Instruments and Experimental Techniques (English Translation of Pribory I Tekhnika Eksperimenta), 2: 103-114. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/azojete143/www.azojete.com.ng Orugba et al: Five-Factor Response Surface Optimisation of Hydrochloric Acid Dissolution of Alumina from a Nigerian Clay. AZOJETE,16(4):821-832. ISSN 1596-2490; e-ISSN 2545-5818, www.azojete.com.ng Corresponding author’s e-mail address: orugbahenry@yahoo.com 832 Raissi, S. and Farsari, RE. 2009. Statistical Process Optimization through Multi-Response Surface Methodology. International Journal of Mathematical, Computational, Physical, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 3(3):197-201. Rashid, UF., Anwar, M., Ashraf, MS, and Yusup, S. 2011. Application of response surface methodology for optimizing transesterification of Moringa oleifera oil: Biodiesel production. Energy Conversion and Management 52 (8):3034–3042. Sudamalla, P., Saravanan, P., Matheswaran, M. 2012. Optimisation of operating parameters using response surface methodology for adsorption of crystal violet by activated carbon prepared from Mango kernel. Sustainable Environment Research, 22 (1): 1-7. Udochukwu, M., Anyakwo, CN., Onyemaobi, OO. and Nwobodo, CS. 2019. The Thermal activation of Nsu Clay for enhanced Alumina leaching response. International Journal of Engineering and Technologies, 16: 34-46 http://www.azojete.com.ng