


































Microsoft Word - JSR Final 2 for pdf.doc


Artivate:	
  A	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  in	
  the	
  Arts	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   Volume	
  1,	
  Issue	
  2	
  

http://artivate.org	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  pp.	
  53-­‐63	
  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  
Artivate	
  1	
  (2)	
  	
  	
   	
   	
   	
  
	
   53	
  

INFUSING ENTREPRENEURSHIP WITHIN NON-BUSINESS DISCIPLINES: 
PREPARING ARTISTS AND OTHERS FOR SELF-EMPLOYMENT AND 
ENTREPRENEURSHIP 
Joseph S. Roberts, Webster University 
 

Abstract 
The demand for interdisciplinary and cross campus courses has increased substantially over the 
past few years resulting in increased program offerings and modifications to existing coursework 
in universities across the nation. This is very clearly evident in the arts realm. However, there is 
no clear agreement of knowledge, skills and abilities deemed important to the success of self-
employed artists and arts entrepreneurs. This essay presents qualitative data collected from 
personal conversations and other data collected over the past several years from students and 
faculty members engaged in lessons learned from The Coleman Foundation Faculty Fellows 
Program, a national initiative of The Coleman Foundation. Building upon the lessons learned 
from this initiative a framework is presented to embed entrepreneurship content across several 
arts subjects.  Suggestions for conceiving and designing entrepreneurship course content are 
portrayed. The “modules” approach to the infusion of entrepreneurship within the arts and other 
disciplines are presented. Assessment methods to measure the impact of using such modules to 
infuse entrepreneurship are explained. Pedagogical constructs and pedagogical resources are 
presented. The implications for future research are postulated and suggested. 
 

Introduction and Background 
 Sarasvathy and Venkatraman (2011), Patzelt and Shepherd (2011), and McMullen 
(2011), among others, seem to agree that entrepreneurship is a force for creating a better world. 
Dale Meyer stated that there are a number of “elephants in the room” when discussing 
entrepreneurship education, and he suggests that one of these “elephants” is a perception that 
entrepreneurship is not the property of B-schools (2011).  Supporters of Meyer’s statement argue 
that a significant number of start-ups arise from non-business disciplines, thus entrepreneurship 
is an interdisciplinary endeavor. Regardless of where entrepreneurship belongs and how it should 
be positioned in higher education, it is safe to say that over the past two decades efforts to spread 
entrepreneurship education across campuses have taken root. One such effort is the Coleman 
Foundation Faculty Fellows Program launched in 2009 and funded by the Coleman Foundation 
Incorporated.  
 The Coleman Foundation Faculty Fellows Program promotes the infusion of 
entrepreneurship across non-business disciplines, the eduction of artists, and preparation of them 
for self-employment. The Foundation supports entrepreneurship education across non-business 
disciplines, supports having faculty infuse entrepreneurship content in their courses, and helps 
prepare students for a possible career as an entrepreneur in their chosen field of study. Further 
details of the program, examples of syllabi, and other content are available at the website 
www.colemanfellows.com. This essay discusses the infusion of entrepreneurship in arts 
curricula. 

To further explain the infusion of entrepreneurship content into the arts realm, consider 
the myth of the starving artist romantically pursuing the muse in a cold-water garret that seems 
embedded in the psyche of human beings even now (Rich, Roberts, et al., 2002). The fact is, 
artists, artisans, actors, producers and novelists have found ways to function in the world of 



Artivate:	
  A	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  in	
  the	
  Arts	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   Volume	
  1,	
  Issue	
  2	
  

http://artivate.org	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  pp.	
  53-­‐63	
  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  
Artivate	
  1	
  (2)	
  	
  	
   	
   	
   	
  
	
   54	
  

commerce without sacrificing their love and passion of art.  Such self-employed or freelance 
artists and others who own arts-based businesses are entrepreneurs in the arts and culture.   

Rembrandt Van Rijn (1606–1669) is considered an important, influential Dutch artist of 
the seventeenth century; his extraordinary production is equal to that of other significant 
European artists.  When we think of Rembrandt, we think of a great painter, but he was also a 
teacher and an arts entrepreneur.  He earned large sums of money from the sale of his works - 
especially commissioned portraits and prints. Like many entrepreneurs, he experienced both 
great wealth and financial difficulties. 

  Although still debated, there exists support for the left-brain/right-brain dominance 
concept for thinking patterns, as suggested by Jarrett (Christian, 2012). Educators, policy 
makers, and leaders of industry tend to agree with Daniel Pink’s suggestion that traditional roles 
of leaders in organizations are shifting thinking patterns from left-brain reliance to right-brain 
reliance (2005). Steve Blank, Silicon Valley Entrepreneur, suggested that right-brain behavior 
seemed to contribute to innovation and innovative behavior (Blank, 2011).  Regardless of which 
side of the left-brain/right-brain dominance argument one chooses, it can be agreed that it is the 
well-connected coordinated flow of information between the two hemispheres of the brain that 
seem to make the connection between business and arts effective and productive.  

However, the universe of arts education and universe of entrepreneurship education do 
not seem to overlap in schools. There exist perceptions and myths that prevent various artists 
from becoming arts entrepreneurs. Still, since the 1990s there has been a concerted effort in the 
United States to link arts and entrepreneurship disciplines. In 1999, I was given an opportunity to 
establish curriculum and develop pedagogical content at Columbia College to find common areas 
of interest and content within the individual disciplines of arts and entrepreneurship. 
 A collection of lessons learned from the trials and tribulations of this pedagogical journey 
of the past fourteen years are presented in this article. Addressing this challenge with the skills of 
a business owner/entrepreneur/artist, this journey allowed me to achieve both success and failure 
in my quest. My successes and failures also stem from an initiative to coordinate and lead a 
national charge to integrate entrepreneurial thinking, knowledge, and skill-sets within arts 
education at the tertiary level. 
 

Students’ Perspectives 
 Over the past decade, I have been fortunate to interact with numerous artists interested in 
obtaining entrepreneurial skills at events like the Self–Employment in the Arts and CEO 
conferences (see www.selfemploymentinthearts.com, www.c-e-o.org) These student-based 
conferences are designed to initiate activities that go beyond the learning that occurs in the 
classroom, to “service learning” and “experiential learning.”  Students and entrepreneurs from all 
types of industries and trades are brought together to facilitate the exchange of entrepreneurial 
knowledge and skills. The following ten “points” are synthesized from more than approximately 
370 conversations with students. These are guiding thoughts as educators pursue options to 
educate art students. 

1. Arts students do not think about themselves as the “starving kind;” only their parents 
seem to. 

2. Arts students demand entrepreneurship knowledge and skill sets. 
3. Arts students see courses in accounting, law, marketing and management as designed to 

prepare students for corporate jobs. None of these arts students wanted to work for 



Artivate:	
  A	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  in	
  the	
  Arts	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   Volume	
  1,	
  Issue	
  2	
  

http://artivate.org	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  pp.	
  53-­‐63	
  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  
Artivate	
  1	
  (2)	
  	
  	
   	
   	
   	
  
	
   55	
  

medium and big corporations. Rather, they want to practice their art form more than 
anything else and are willing to sacrifice for this goal. 

4. Most of them did not see themselves as “Entrepreneurs.” They are interested in self-
employment, rather than starting a business, growing it and then selling it. There is 
normally no exit strategy for artists and arts businesses. 

5. When students hear about Facebook, EBay, Twitter, Groupon, etc., they make it clear 
that they are interested in bread and butter entrepreneurial businesses rather than such 
high-techs and gazelles.  

6. The “commercial art” vs. “art for art sake” debate is not a concern for students. Students 
perceive this as a discussion within the community of arts educators rather than the 
community of students. 

7. Students are concerned about their own aesthetic values and connecting with their 
audiences as artists, more so than as business owners. For artists, the primacy of creating 
art is important, and making huge profits is less important. 

8. Arts students are not opposed to working as waitresses, production assistants, and such 
minimum wage jobs to support their creative endeavors. 

9. If given a choice between making a lot of money and pursuing their passion as artists, 
students would rather put their passion first than worry about money. 

10. Instead of focusing on revenues, arts students are more concerned with aesthetics, ethics, 
the “purity” of art, and impact on environment than non-arts students.  

 
These conversations gathered from the students I talked with need further exploration to 

separate opinions from facts. Such an undertaking is underway, but we do not have the time 
to wait for the results. We need to continue to develop effective pedagogy coursework to 
address the needs of arts students now. 

 
Pedagogical Challenges 

As Program Coordinator of the Coleman Fellows Program, I took on the charge of 
developing a process for designing modules to establish a pedagogical base for infusing 
entrepreneurship into the Fellows’ coursework. From the time I led the formation of a Special 
Interest Group (SIG) within The United States Association of Small Business and 
Entrepreneurship (USASBE), to the time I built undergraduate and graduate degree offerings in 
Arts Entrepreneurship directly and indirectly at several institutions, this path has been filled with 
pedagogical pitfalls and challenges. It was a Coleman White Paper on the topic of 
Entrepreneurship in the Arts that provided a way of exploring a twin track proposition, namely a 
track for students engaged in arts education seeking a means of survival as self-employed artists 
and entrepreneurs and a track for students who were business majors seeking to engage the arts 
as a commodity and wanting to become arts business owners (Rich, Roberts, et al., 2002). While 
artists populated one group, non-artists populated the other group. Though at the time this 
approach seemed to make sense, looking back I realize that this was a mistake primarily because 
non-arts students seemed to have failed as artists, but wanted to hold on to the idea of a 
peripheral association with the arts. 
 
Faculty resistance to pedagogy integration 
 Andrea Haussmann (2010) questioned the impact entrepreneurship education and training 
has on long-term success of cultural start-ups. Internationally and in the U.S., researchers seem 



Artivate:	
  A	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  in	
  the	
  Arts	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   Volume	
  1,	
  Issue	
  2	
  

http://artivate.org	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  pp.	
  53-­‐63	
  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  
Artivate	
  1	
  (2)	
  	
  	
   	
   	
   	
  
	
   56	
  

to agree that it is the beneficiary of arts entrepreneurship education is the economic viability 
economic viability of arts and cultural industries that benefit from arts entrepreneurship, 
education, and training, not just individual arts entrepreneurs. This distinction is what we need to 
examine further (Beckman, 2007; Mandel, 2011). Perhaps viewing this from a culture and arts 
funding policy perspective could be one approach. Regardless, to increase the chance of success 
of start-ups within the arts and cultural sector, arts education needs to integrate management, 
leadership, and business skills rather than trying to integrate arts education within business 
programs.  
 At the time, some business faculty expressed opinions that arts students were incapable of 
understanding business concepts, gaining business knowledge, and skills. Based on my 
experience of teaching numerous arts students over the years I can say with confidence that this 
is absolutely not true. The perception that arts students will not be successful in their business 
endeavor to become a business owner is misplaced. Arts students make a choice. They choose 
not to pursue a career as an accountant or a lawyer, for example. As one student said to me, “It is 
not that I cannot learn how to develop a balance sheet, but I choose not to. I would rather hire an 
accountant or a CPA and monitor them and supervise them for outcomes that I define and expect 
from my enterprise as an arts entrepreneur, so please teach me to do that effectively,” (personal 
conversations, 2000 - 2010). The challenge then is to help arts students develop business skills 
allowing them to be successful. Artists should be able to, as an example, review financial 
statements, understand them, and ask the correct questions. To advance arts entrepreneurship, the 
latter approach is better. Starting with accounting students and asking them to learn to draw or 
play music or some other art form will not better serve arts entrepreneurship. Over the years I 
have heard several arguments and suggestions around how to teach non-artists arts appreciation 
and thus enable them to become arts entrepreneurs. But I have come to realize that doing so is ill 
conceived. Instead, we have to focus on pedagogy that infuses entrepreneurship in to the arts 
curriculum. My efforts to integrate these two different areas of pedagogy were augmented with 
the formation of The USASBE arts special interest group in 2001.  
 

Trends In Integrating Arts and Entrepreneurship 
Since 1999, when this journey started for me, arts entrepreneurship has achieved national 

and international recognition as a serious topic of research and education in higher learning. 
There is still work ahead, but we seem to agree that there exists content and substance that 
defines arts entrepreneurship.  According to the Acton Foundation for Entrepreneurial 
Excellence based in Austin Texas, entrepreneurs are heroes.1  I view artists who become 
entrepreneurs similarly. The Julliard School of Music and several Ivy League institutions have 
embraced entrepreneurship in the arts as a suitable topic to be included in the curriculum.  

Groups such as Association of Arts Administration Educators (AAAE) and USASBE 
have embraced arts entrepreneurship as a segment of larger disciplines. Based on USASBEi 
membership over the years since its inception, 2001, there are hundreds of arts entrepreneurship 
courses.  According to members of the USASBE Arts Entrepreneurship Special Interest Group, 
estimates are as high as 450 arts entrepreneurship courses.  
 As educators, we need to take a closer look at these courses and also address some of the 
academic/structural barriers that may prevent arts entrepreneurship from becoming a 
concentration, emphasis, or major at graduate and undergraduate levels. When I proposed a 

	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
1	
  See	
  actonhero.org	
  
2	
  See http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/business/standards/	
  



Artivate:	
  A	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  in	
  the	
  Arts	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   Volume	
  1,	
  Issue	
  2	
  

http://artivate.org	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  pp.	
  53-­‐63	
  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  
Artivate	
  1	
  (2)	
  	
  	
   	
   	
   	
  
	
   57	
  

major in Arts Entrepreneurship at several institutions there was significant opposition from 
various quarters. After several contentious discussions, my efforts succeeded and the proposal 
was approved as a major at both graduate and undergraduate levels. I found that primary 
opposition came from arts faculty who taught music, visual arts, photography; I received less 
opposition from graphic designers and digital media faculty. The performing arts faculty as a 
group was perhaps the most willing to embrace these efforts. It was remarkable that business 
faculty were also less enthusiastic and obstructionist at various levels. One specific criticism 
was, “Is there really a difference between teaching business skills and teaching entrepreneurship 
skills? Entrepreneurship is nothing more than a subset of strategic management mixed with some 
marketing content, opportunity recognition, and market expansion methods. Also, since business 
plans seem to be the final product graduate and undergraduate programs produce, is there a 
difference between graduate and undergraduate coursework?” (Rich, Roberts, et al., 2002). 
These kinds of questions were used to block arts entrepreneurship course approvals and their 
permanent addition to curriculum and programs. The best answer to address the questions about 
grad/undergrad levels is the following quote; “This is no different than in accounting – graduates 
and undergraduates are taught at different levels of rigor and intensity and depth,” (personal 
conversations, 2000 - 2010).  
 In addition, it was always a struggle to get the business faculty not to dumb down the 
content for artists. Misguided and false perceptions were responsible for this mistake on their 
part. Musicians, dancers and visual artists are as capable of learning accounting as business 
students.  Theater and arts administration programs seem to have made it past these criticisms. 
Though it is reasonable to expect some resistance, what surprised me were its sources. Primarily 
arts education faculty and administrators were more reluctant to accept and embrace a change in 
thinking and attitude. The one positive in all of this is that students do not care about these 
conflicts; they are demanding arts entrepreneurship education now. They realize that it is simply 
not enough to just learn to play an instrument, take wonderful pictures, sing, direct, and so on. 
Arts students simply accept the fact that they need to learn business skills and competencies.  
  
Entrepreneurs vs. Administrators 

Arts entrepreneurs differ from arts managers in their perspectives on the business of arts. 
There are key differences between these two groups. Administrators are usually concerned with 
maintaining resources rather than risking resources on innovative ideas that may or may not 
succeed. Entrepreneurs pursue new opportunities with a willingness to risk failure. Arts 
entrepreneurship programs designed by arts administrators run the risk, therefore, of being more 
focused on rationality, predictive management processes, and pedagogy. This difference is 
reflected in the struggles some faculty trying to integrate entrepreneurship and the arts face 
across the landscape of academia, as well as within professional organizations such as the 
Association of Arts Administration Educators (AAAE). It is not clear if some of this resistance is 
due to “turf and fiefdom battles,” or simply administrator vs. entrepreneur attitudes. Regardless 
of this situation, educators must push on to infuse entrepreneurship within the arts curriculum. 

 
Infusing Entrepreneurship in to the Arts Curriculum 
 Entrepreneurial knowledge and skills are still being developed and refined by business 
school programs. The field is very young and is just beginning to grow its body of knowledge. 
As of now, accrediting agencies such as Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business 



Artivate:	
  A	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  in	
  the	
  Arts	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   Volume	
  1,	
  Issue	
  2	
  

http://artivate.org	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  pp.	
  53-­‐63	
  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  
Artivate	
  1	
  (2)	
  	
  	
   	
   	
   	
  
	
   58	
  

do not recognize entrepreneurship as a body of knowledge2. John Hughes, Chairman at Emeritus, 
and Michael Hennessy, President of the Coleman Foundation, both state that the best thing to 
happen to entrepreneurship is that it has escaped business school (personal conversation, 2008). 
This is based on their collective experience of distributing close to $40,000,000 dollars in grants 
to support entrepreneurship education programs over several decades. It is against this backdrop 
that I have been engaged in the development and modification of arts entrepreneurship 
curriculum over the past several years. 
 Collective experiences from coordinating the Coleman Foundation Faculty Fellows 
Program, the experiences gained with self-employment in the arts, and (SEA) Conference3, an 
annual student artist conference, have instilled within me an understanding of how to best 
prepare artists for arts entrepreneurship careers. 
 First is the realization that teaching entrepreneurship to artists is a messy proposition. 
Students from other areas such as engineering, sciences, and health also seem to have 
perceptions about entrepreneurship similar to art majors. However, as evidenced by a recent 
article by Caitlin Dewey (2012), it is safe to say that educators have a moral obligation to 
provide the best education and training to help artists become successful arts entrepreneurs.  
Artists also seem to be stuck with the “selling out” and “commercial artist” syndrome. “Selling 
Out,” as faculty and students explained to me, is the act of pursuing commercial success without 
regard to the purity of the art form and compromising aesthetics for money (Iannone, 2011).  
“Commercial artist” are those who think of producing art in terms of an assembly line, akin to 
the manufacturing of paper cups with designs painted on them by a machine. Though this 
attitude is surely not as prevalent today as it was in the early 2000s, it is important to create a 
balance between purity of art and how well audiences accept and financially support them.  
 Arts educators are also sometimes known to perpetuate the myth of the starving artists. 
Individuals like Lisa Canning4 and Genevieve Thiers5, among others, demonstrate that artists 
could become entrepreneurs. Arts educators need to embrace the idea that artists can become arts 
entrepreneurs.  I have concluded that it is not critical to develop definitions of whom or what an 
arts entrepreneur is. Students and parents of students who pay for their education do not care 
about definitions. Parents only care about how their sons and daughters will survive as artists. 
They are often satisfied when we explain the linkage of entrepreneurship to arts education. 
 

Infusing Entrepreneurship Modules 
 Seeking to find the best solution, informed with qualitative data from the Coleman 
Fellows, faculty who have engaged in teaching entrepreneurship to artists, and by collective 
experiences over the years, I started using the term “infusing entrepreneurship” to describe my 
approach. “Infusing” is achieved by the modification of learning objectives in disciplinary 
courses supported by lesson plans that adopt entrepreneurship knowledge, skills, and abilities. 
Furthermore, the lesson plans translate the knowledge, skills and abilities into discipline specific 
language and semantics. Infusing entrepreneurship into arts curricula seems best accomplished 
by developing modules of information, knowledge, skills, and abilities. A review of papers 

	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
2	
  See http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/business/standards/	
  
3	
  www.selfemploymentinthearts.org	
  
	
  
4	
  Lisa	
  Canning	
  –	
  EntrepreneurtheArts.com	
  
5	
  Opera	
  singer	
  &	
  Founder	
  Sittercity.com	
  



Artivate:	
  A	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  in	
  the	
  Arts	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   Volume	
  1,	
  Issue	
  2	
  

http://artivate.org	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  pp.	
  53-­‐63	
  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  
Artivate	
  1	
  (2)	
  	
  	
   	
   	
   	
  
	
   59	
  

presented at the International Association of Arts and Cultural Management, (AIMAC) between 
1991 and 2009 reveal that arts research papers focused on marketing, management, and 
consumer behavior (Pérez-Cabañero & Cuadrado-García, 2011), which suggests that infusing 
these entrepreneurship topics is not such a far-fetched idea for the arts education community.  
 A module is a collection of thoughts, knowledge, and skills that can be delivered in two 
or three class sessions. Such modules are ideal to get students thinking about entrepreneurship as 
a process rather than an event. There are several key elements to module building that have been 
tested and re-tested since the 1980s by the author. This follows a cry for curriculum reform in 
engineering, mathematics, and chemistry (US Department of Education Report, 1983). Educators 
have been championing these approaches to obtain the same end result, to prepare students for 
successful career paths. Combining module learning with entrepreneurship education and 
training seems to be taking root. Although modules would be primarily based on direct 
experience from working with Fellows, there is plenty of room to expand the modules approach 
across the entire academic landscape.  

Based on various conversations with Coleman Fellows and faculty over the years, it 
seems pedagogically there is a challenge because entrepreneurship knowledge, skills, and 
abilities seem best taught in an experiential setting. Successful entrepreneurs seem to agree that 
“doing” is the best teacher for entrepreneurship. In my experience, “doing” entrepreneurship can 
best be achieved with the modules approach. Students are taught basic entrepreneurial concepts 
and knowledge. They are then engaged in an exercise in which they perform several tasks and 
record data. One such task could be establishing an E-bay account and finding items to sell. The 
item, if sold, should be shipped, money collected, and net profit calculated. This is easily 
achieved with a modular approach. A module that captures this activity is easily adaptable into 
any arts entrepreneurship course. Thus, I have come to believe that the modules approach is the 
best option we have, as educators. 

 
Sample Dance Entrepreneurship Module 

Several educators who teach dance have infused entrepreneurship in their coursework. 
One required her students to create a portfolio. With most dance students seeking to become self-
employed or freelance, they seek a “gig” or a job with a dance company nationally or 
internationally. The other path centers on the creation of dance studios or dance competitions. 
Based on several observations in this realm, a typical module for infusing entrepreneurship is: 

• Session 1  
o Passion as skill – Benefits of entrepreneurship – Thinking like an entrepreneur – 
o Building your entrepreneurship portfolio 

• Session 2  
o Your passion for dance -Your Genre – Aesthetics – Reaching your audience – 

The business of Dance – Your action plan 
• Session 3  

o Elevator Pitch – How will you create value – New Genres? 
o Innovation in Dance forms 

  
There are several dance instructors who adopt aspects of this module. Some created 

lesson plans and compressed this content into one, or in some cases, part of a class session. The 
effectiveness of doing so is not clear at this time and needs further research. 
 



Artivate:	
  A	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  in	
  the	
  Arts	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   Volume	
  1,	
  Issue	
  2	
  

http://artivate.org	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  pp.	
  53-­‐63	
  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  
Artivate	
  1	
  (2)	
  	
  	
   	
   	
   	
  
	
   60	
  

Sample Visual Arts Entrepreneurship Module: 
 As a Batik artist, I engaged the challenge of infusing entrepreneurship in visual arts 
courses differently than other art forms. Mixing genres or converging genres with an 
entrepreneurial attitude should guide the infusion of entrepreneurship in visual arts. Opportunity 
recognition within visual communications is not just developing an audience and reaching them, 
but changing the way we communicate.  
A typical entrepreneurship model for visual arts: 

• Session 1  
o Visual Arts as a converging art form – Photography – Paintings – Sculptures – 

Water Colors – Functional Arts 
o Introduce opportunity recognition concepts – Market Innovation Techniques –  
o Developing a feasibility analysis  

• Session 2  
o Develop an entrepreneurial action plan – define your aesthetic – Develop an 

understanding of the multiple genres that can be converged – develop a method to 
blend Performing and Visual arts Genres 

• Session 3 
o Finalize a portfolio ready for galleries – juried shows and events – financial plan 

to assess viability and pricing model options  
 
Learning Outcomes Modification as Best Practice 
 The following are sampled from syllabi posted to the Coleman Fellows website 
(www.colemanfellows.com). These learning objectives were added to arts course syllabi: 

• Identify your passion and potential for success as a business owner 
• Identify skills necessary to execute a new business idea 
• Identify resources necessary to launch a new business 
• Demonstrate how opportunities can become businesses 
• Synthesize and demonstrate effective collaborative and communication skills 
• Develop concepts and understanding of financial restraints to start a business 
• Identify the role leadership plays in entrepreneurship in the arts 
• Identify and synthesize a process for recognizing new business opportunities 
• Explore and develop new market entry strategies 
• Research and craft an elevator pitch and business plan for an arts related business 

enterprise. 
 

There are several other examples of business and entrepreneurship related learning 
objectives that are now guiding dance, music, fashion, and graphic design faculty in infusing 
entrepreneurship and small business concepts in their course work. More examples can be found 
on the Coleman Fellows website listed above. This is a best practice because the results point to 
a palpable student enthusiasm in entrepreneurship. Based on personal knowledge, reports from 
Fellows, and talking to arts students, it is clear that students exposed to entrepreneurship content 
are starting businesses or becoming self-employed. It also seems that more arts students are 
starting businesses than business majors at several Coleman Fellows Program Schools. This 
approach seems to be working and deemed best practice. 

  



Artivate:	
  A	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  in	
  the	
  Arts	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   Volume	
  1,	
  Issue	
  2	
  

http://artivate.org	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  pp.	
  53-­‐63	
  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  
Artivate	
  1	
  (2)	
  	
  	
   	
   	
   	
  
	
   61	
  

Assessing the Impact of Arts Entrepreneurship Education 
 As these efforts were under way, one question concerned testing, “How do we know that 
this is working?” One of my tasks as Coleman Fellows Program Coordinator was to help design 
assessment tools. As entrepreneurship modules, learning objectives, and lesson plans were 
implemented, it became obvious these efforts required measuring. A pretest-posttest approach 
was chosen to address this need. The following is a summary of this effort.  

Assessing modules and modified learning objectives to infuse entrepreneurship 
knowledge, skills, and competencies has yet to be defined. Although there are several examples 
and studies on how to assess modules in non-arts disciplines, there is no proven method to test 
entrepreneurship (personal conversation USASBE annual meeting 2011). An experiment with 
pre- and posttesting was attempted. Thus far, the results have been mixed due to the problem of 
testing bias.   

To reduce bias we had to implement a new approach to the test design. We designed a 
test given to half the students in the class when the course began.  We then taught the course as 
usual only to follow the conclusion of the course with a posttest administered to the other half of 
the class. This is not a silver bullet to cure all the issues of pre- and posttest method, but it seems 
to reduce the test bias. Moreover, when this approach was used, the results seem to point to a 
better understanding of the views students hold about entrepreneurship. However, the answer to 
the question whether arts entrepreneurship education is producing or helping more artists become 
arts entrepreneurs, or self-employed as artists is not clear from an empirical and scientific 
perspective. (www.Colemanfellows.com) 
 

Conclusion and Future Research Topics 
 In conclusion, it appears safe to say that entrepreneurship in the arts is a developing field 
that proves a viable career option for artists. Over the years, students have demonstrated their 
acquired abilities to become self-employed as photographers, writers, actors, designers, 
musicians, and painters. Still, the educator’s job to effectively blend entrepreneurship and arts is 
far from complete. As future artists seek to debunk the myth of the starving artist, the process of 
artists becoming entrepreneurs is becoming clearer. In addition to the undeniable and 
demonstrable key advances in the field, it is also clear there are several serious questions about 
entrepreneurship in the arts.  

1. What are the administrative and curricular barriers that prevent arts students from 
enrolling in entrepreneurship courses? 

2. What are the pedagogical constructs that define arts entrepreneurship? 
3. What differences exist between entrepreneurship in the arts and Arts Administration 

pedagogy? 
4. What are the best module designs to infuse entrepreneurship in the arts? Who is teaching 

them and where are they being taught? 
5. Assessing impact of entrepreneurship in the arts education as a two-pronged initiative, 

namely, pedagogy effectiveness and conversion ratio of arts students to arts 
entrepreneurs. Is arts entrepreneurship education producing arts businesses or self-
employment in the arts? 

There are probably several more avenues of inquiry available, but these questions are ones that 
interest several of the Coleman Fellows.  
 It is my belief that convergence of disciplines such as communications, graphic design, 
and game design, among others is trending, as are integrative skills and the blending of aesthetic 



Artivate:	
  A	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  in	
  the	
  Arts	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   Volume	
  1,	
  Issue	
  2	
  

http://artivate.org	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  pp.	
  53-­‐63	
  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  
Artivate	
  1	
  (2)	
  	
  	
   	
   	
   	
  
	
   62	
  

reasoning. Entrepreneurship in the arts goes beyond helping artists acquire business start-up 
skills and its pedagogy could include innovation through genre blending. For example, musicians 
can start blending genres that were thought of as impossible to blend, a bluegrass banjo player 
DJ who can rap. The future is looking bright and full of opportunity for artists, arts entrepreneurs 
and arts entrepreneurship educators. 
	
  

References:	
  
	
  	
  
Beckman,	
  D.	
  (2007).	
  "Adventuring"	
  arts	
  entrepreneurship	
  curriculum	
  in	
  higher	
  education:	
  

An	
  examination	
  of	
  present	
  efforts,	
  obstacles,	
  and	
  best	
  practices.	
  Journal	
  of	
  Arts	
  
Management,	
  Law	
  &	
  Society,	
  37	
  (2),	
  87.	
  

	
  
Blank,	
  S.	
  &	
  Dorf,	
  B.	
  (2012)	
  The	
  start-­‐up	
  owner’s	
  manual:	
  The	
  step	
  by	
  step	
  guide	
  for	
  building	
  a	
  

great	
  company.	
  	
  Pescadaro,	
  CA:	
  K&S	
  Ranch	
  
	
  
Christian	
  (2012)	
  Brain	
  myths.	
  Psychology	
  Today	
  online.	
  Retrieved	
  December	
  12.	
  2012,	
  from	
  

www.Psychologytoday.Com	
  
	
  
Dewey,	
  C.	
  (2012)	
  Worst	
  college	
  majors	
  for	
  your	
  career.	
  Kiplinger.	
  Retrieved	
  December	
  12,	
  

2012	
  from	
  http://finance.yahoo.com	
  
	
  
Hausmann,	
  A.	
  (2010).	
  German	
  artists	
  between	
  bohemian	
  ideals	
  and	
  entrepreneurial	
  

dynamics:	
  Reflections	
  on	
  cultural	
  entrepreneurship	
  and	
  the	
  need	
  for	
  start-­‐up	
  
management.	
  International	
  Journal	
  of	
  Arts	
  Management,	
  12	
  (2),	
  17.	
  	
  

	
  
Iannone,	
  (2011).	
  5	
  Artistic	
  Geniuses	
  Who	
  Became	
  Great	
  Only	
  After	
  Selling	
  Out.	
  Retrieved	
  

November	
  12,	
  2012	
  from	
  http://www.cracked.com	
  
	
  
Mandel,	
  S.	
  W.,	
  &	
  Virgil,	
  S.	
  (2011).	
  Creativity	
  and	
  feasibility:	
  Applying	
  the	
  IDEO	
  innovation	
  

processes	
  to	
  current	
  societal	
  challenges.	
  International	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  
and	
  Small	
  Business,	
  13(1),	
  32-­‐37.	
  

	
  
Meyer,	
  Dale.	
  (2011)	
  The	
  reinvention	
  of	
  academic	
  entrepreneurship.	
  Journal	
  	
  of	
  
Small	
  Business	
  Management,	
  2011	
  	
  49(1),	
  1–8.	
  
	
  
McMullen,	
  J.	
  (2011).	
  Delineating	
  the	
  domain	
  of	
  development	
  entrepreneurship:	
  A	
  market-­‐

based	
  approach	
  to	
  facilitating	
  inclusive	
  economic	
  growth.	
  Entrepreneurship	
  Theory	
  
and	
  Practice,	
  35(1),	
  185–193.	
  

	
  
Patzelt,	
  H.	
  &	
  Sheperd,	
  D.	
  (2011).	
  Recognizing	
  opportunities	
  for	
  sustainable	
  development.	
  

Entrepreneurship	
  Theory	
  and	
  Practice,	
  35	
  (4),	
  pp.	
  631-­‐652.	
  	
  
	
  
Pérez-Cabañero & Cuadrado-García, (2011). Evolution of arts and cultural management 

research over the first ten AIMAC Conferences (1991 – 2009), International 
Journal of Arts Management, 13 (3), 55. 	
  



Artivate:	
  A	
  Journal	
  of	
  Entrepreneurship	
  in	
  the	
  Arts	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   Volume	
  1,	
  Issue	
  2	
  

http://artivate.org	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  pp.	
  53-­‐63	
  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________	
  
Artivate	
  1	
  (2)	
  	
  	
   	
   	
   	
  
	
   63	
  

	
  
Pink,	
  D.	
  (2006)	
  A	
  whole	
   new	
  mind.	
  	
  New	
  York,	
  NY:	
  	
  Riverhead	
  Books.	
  
	
  
Rich,	
  Roberts,	
  J.	
  et	
  al.	
  (2002)	
  Arts	
  entrepreneurship:	
  The	
  next	
  generation.	
  Coleman	
  

Foundation	
  White	
  Paper.	
  	
  	
  United	
  States	
  Association	
  of	
  Small	
  Business	
  and	
  
Entrepreneurship.	
  Reno,	
  NV.	
  

	
  
Sarasvathy,	
  S.	
  &	
  Venkataraman,	
  S.	
  (2011).	
  Entrepreneurship	
  as	
  method:	
  Open	
  questions	
  for	
  

an	
  entrepreneurial	
  future.	
  Entrepreneurship	
  Theory	
  and	
  Practice,	
  35(1),	
  113–135.	
  
	
  
United	
  States	
  Department	
  of	
  Education.	
  A	
  Nation	
  At	
  Risk:	
  The	
  Imperative	
  for	
  Education	
  

Reform.	
  National	
  Commission	
  on	
  Excellence	
  in	
  Education.	
  Washington	
  D.C.	
  1983.	
  
	
  
	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
 
 


