







































 
 

1 
© 2024 by the authors; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

Asian Business Research Journal 
Vol. 9, 1-6, 2024 

ISSN: 2576-6759 
DOI: 10.55220/25766759.148 
© 2024 by the authors; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 
 

 

 
Corporate governance and financial performance of oil and gas firms: The Nigerian 
experience 

 
Lucky Onmonya1   

Kolawole Ebire2   

Kehinde Lawal3   
 

 
 

1,3Department of Accounting, Nile University of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.  
1Email: lucky.onmonya@nileuniversity.edu.ng  
3Email: twinsworld80@gmail.com  
2Department of Banking and Finance, Nile University of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria. 
2Email: Kolawole.ebire@nileuniversity.edu.ng  
( Corresponding Author) 

 
 

 
Abstract 

As a result of corporate scandals, governments and corporations around the world enacted a slew 
of laws and recommendations known as best practices codes. As a result, this study examines the 
effect of corporate governance on the financial performance of listed Nigerian oil and gas firms 
from 2012 to 2022. The sample size for the study was set at nine firms. Corporate governance was 
measured by board size, composition, independence, and audit committee size, while financial 
performance was measured by Return on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE). The 
hypotheses were tested using fixed effect panel regression, which was informed by the Hausman 
test. Findings revealed that board size has a significant positive effect on ROA while board size 
have an insignificant effect on ROE. In addition, board composition has an insignificant effect on 
both the ROA and ROE. Furthermore, board independence has a significant negative effect on the 
ROA and ROE. Similarly, the size of the audit committee has a significant negative effect on ROA, 
while the effect on ROE was negative but insignificant. The study concludes that corporate 
governance significantly affect financial performance of listed oil and gas firms in Nigeria. The 
Security and Exchange Commission should ensure that listed oil and gas firms adhere strictly  to 
the required board size since a larger board does not influence financial performance. 

 
Keywords: Audit committee size, Board composition, Board size, Return on asset, Return on equity. 

JEL Classification: M4; M41; M42; O16. 

 
1. Introduction 

The failure of some multinational companies in developed and developing countries have awakened investors to 
take necessary steps to ensure their investment's safety. For this reason, there has been an increase in good 
corporate governance among companies in various nations, especially in quoted companies. Corporate governance 
is referred to as set of rules, regulations, and processes that regulate the control and management of a corporation. 
These rules are intended to protect the firm's internal and external stakeholders. Aligning the interests of 
shareholders, directors, management, and staff is are key aspects of corporate governance. 

The outcome of corporate scandals made countries and corporate agencies worldwide enact a set of rules and 
regulations to serve as standards for conduct. These guidelines are laid down rules that regulate and guide the 
corporate board's policies, procedures and structure in implementing their monitoring roles. In Nigeria, the 
Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance (NCCG) 2020 applies to all economic sectors. 

The firm's primary objective is shareholders' wealth maximisation, which is reflected in how well its strategies 
are translated into monetary terms. Corporate governance has been linked with firms’ financial performance. This 
study financial performance is proxy as Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Asset (ROA). It has been said that 
Nigeria's oil and gas business is fraught with volatility. The common practise of commercial activities that are 
unethical but widely accepted. Kehinde, Segun, Ibidunni and Kehinde (2021) argued that corporate firms are 
expected to follow all applicable rules and regulations set forth by government agencies to ensure the efficient 
operation of a business. The firm's compliance level has gradually increased since introducing the governance 
codes. However, they have been records of corporate failures. 

A review of past studies showed that the focus was centered on other sectors such as manufacturing (Okeke, 
2021; Owolabi, Bamisaye, Efuntade & Efuntade, 2021) conglomerates (Okolie & Uwejeyan, 2022) banks (Wobo & 
Ibanichuka, 2021; Oyedekun, 2019; Olayinka, 2019) service industry (Esoeghene & Oghenevwogaga, 2021). This 
leaves a gap in Nigeria's oil and gas sector. A review of previous studies findings showed no consensus corporate 
governance and financial performance nexus. For example, Oyedekun (2019) study established an insignificant 
negative effect of corporate governance on financial performance. In contrast, Iheyen (2021) and Balagobei and 

mailto:lucky.onmonya@nileuniversity.edu.ng
mailto:twinsworld80@gmail.com
mailto:Kolawole.ebire@nileuniversity.edu.ng
https://www.doi.org/10.55220/25766759.148
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1081-270X
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7000-2552
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6953-5831


Asian Business Research Journal, 2024, 9: 1-6 

2 
© 2024 by the authors; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

 

Velnampy (2018) found that board size was negatively linked with firm performance. These mixed findings call for 
further research. 

This study also observed that previous studies mostly explored ROA as a financial performance measure. For 
example, Habtoor (2022); Aigbovorhiuwa, Adediran and Achimugu (2022); Sobhan (2021) Oyedekun (2019) and 
Borlea, Achim and Mare (2017). The current study adopts both ROA and ROE. In addition, Shehu (2017) study 
focused on listed oil and gas companies in Nigeria from 2010 to 2015. The current study extends the scope to 2021. 

Given this context, this study seeks to fill the identified gaps that previous studies concentrated on in other 
sectors that do not capture the oil and gas sector. Secondly, the inconsistencies in the findings of previous studies. 
Thirdly, this study examines the effect of corporate governance if different financial performance proxies are 
employed (ROA and ROE). Furthermore, this study broadens the scope of past research on corporate governance 
on financial performance nexus. This study investigates the impact of corporate governance on the fina ncial 
performance of listed Nigerian oil and gas firms. 

The remainder of this study is structured as follows: section 2 highlights the literature reviews which discusses 
the past empirical studies and hypotheses formulation. Section 3 presents the materials and methods used in the 
study followed by the results of the analysis which is presented in section 4. Section 5 highlights the discussion of 
findings and section 6 concludes. 
 

2. Literature Review 
The agency theory postulated by Jensen and Meckling (1976) which explains the principal-agent relationship 

that exists within a corporation is used to underpin this study. In this context, the principal refers to the 
shareholders of the firm, while the agent refers to the management or executives who represents the shareholders. 
The principal-agent relationship creates a possible conflict of interest because the agent may pursue their own 
objectives, which may not align with the principal's. Corporate governance mechanisms are implemented to 
mitigate this agency problem and align Shareholders' and management's interests. These mechanisms include the 
board of directors' size, composition, and committees’ compositions. The theory explains the effectiveness of 
corporate governance in addressing agency problems which directly affect the firm's financial performance. In this 
study, corporate governance is proxied as board size, composition, independence and audit committee size, while 
performance is measured as ROA and ROE. This study introduces firm size as a control variable.  

The effectiveness of member discussion and the board's capacity to make the best financial decisions are both 
impacted by the board size. There has been an ongoing debate about the ideal board size in corporate governance 
studies. Several disagreements exist regarding the link between corporate board size and financial performance. 
According to Sani (2021) larger boards will likely offer more diversity and expertise while enhancing their 
oversight capacity. Moreover, boards of bigger size are more likely to consist of independent directors who possess 
substantial expertise. Larger boards have the ability to provide additional responsibilities to board committees, 
which serves as a deterrent to opportunistic managerial conduct. On the other hand, smaller boards are predicted 
to be more successful at overseeing and regulating firm governance (Biase & Onorato, 2021). Based on this 
argument, the hypothesis is stated as follows: 

H01: Board size has no significant effect on the financial performance of listed Nigeria’s oil and gas firms. 
The board's composition into executive and non-executive directors is another important feature. According to 

Fuzi, Halim, and Julizaerma (2016) the board's non-executive directors won't be able to perform their 
responsibilities well unless they are separate from management and make sure to offer objective business 
judgement. Non-executive directors are the individuals whose shareholders have chosen to represent them, and 
their presence will lessen agency issues. The 2018 Code of Corporate Governance also points out that non-
executive directors provide the board with their knowledge, expertise, and unbiased Evaluation of strategic 
decisions and operational effectiveness. 

Nevertheless, following the recommendations won't be enough if the non-executive directors don't carry out 
their duties (Kanakriyah, 2021). Prior empirical studies (Habtoor, 2022; Benvolio and Ironkwe, 2022) have shown 
that financial performance is affected by board composition. On the contrary, studies such as Ukemenam, Ezike and 
Chijioke (2019); Kiptoo, Kariuki and Ocharo (2021) found that firms’ do not perform optimally when they are 
composed with higher ratio of non-executive directors. Therefore, the hypothesis is stated as: 

H02: Board composition has no significant effect on the financial performance of listed Nigerian’s oil and gas firms.  
Another distinguishing feature of the board of directors is how it is organised. According to Hamada and 

Jwailes (2021) the board's independence allows them to take an autonomous view of the company's financial 
reporting process. It ensures that executive directors do not dominate the board. According to Ahmad-Zaluki and 
Wan-Hussin (2010) a board with more members and a higher proportion of independent directors have higher 
forecast accuracy. Furthermore, Ali and Meah (2021) believe that an independent board strengthens it and reduces 
the agency problem and the possibility of insider exploitation. Due to its independence, the committee can monitor 
financial reporting transparency with greater objectivity. Agency issues between executives and other shareholders 
are diminished by an impartial board towards the executive. An essential factor in ensuring board effectiveness is 
that the committee members be chosen to be free of the influence and pressures of top management (Hamada & 
Jwailes, 2021). Okolie and Uwejeyan (2022); Biase and Onorato (2021); Owolabi et al. (2021)  study showed that 
board independence is significant governance factor which exerts a positive effect on performance. Gatehi and 
Nasieku (2022), Aigbovorhiuwa et al. (2022); Atty, Moustafasoliman and youssef (2018) establish that Board 
independence has no significant effect on financial performance. From the preceding discourse, the hypothesis is 
stated thus: 

H03. Board independence has no significant effect on the financial performance of listed Nigeria’s oil and gas firms.  
The audit committee is a sub-committee of  the firm’s board responsible for overseeing financial reporting and 

disclosures reliably and accurately. Different schools of  thought have differed on the optimal amount that should 
make up the audit committee. According to Appah and Tebepah (2020) as the audit committee grows in size, 
certain directors may not participate as well, which will impact the committee's cohesion when making decisions 
and weaken the committee's job of  keeping an eye on things and making sure they are done right. In turn, this 
could have an effect on how well the business does financially. According to Hamada and Jwailes (2021)  a suitably 



Asian Business Research Journal, 2024, 9: 1-6 

3 
© 2024 by the authors; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

 

sized audit committee would give members the opportunity to put their knowledge and experience to use for the 
benefit of  all parties involved. They also claimed that firms with smaller audit committees with more financial 
expertise to perform better. According to the dependency resource theory, larger audit committees are more 
efficient since they have more manpower to devote to solving the company's problems. The audit committee 
comprises directors who are expected to have a maximum of six members under CAMA requirements. Empirical 
studies (Wobo & Ibanichuka, 2021; Iheyen, 2021; Olayinka, 2019) have shown that the size of audit committee does 
not significantly affect performance. In contrast, empirical evidence (Esoeghene & Oghenevwogaga, 2021; Okeke, 
2021; Daniel Eguasa & Excellence, 2021) showed that audit committee size has significant positive effects on 
financial performance. Hence, the hypothesis is stated as follows:  

H04. Audit committee size has no significant effect on the return on asset of listed Nigeria’s oil and gas firms. 
 

3. Materials and Methods 
An ex-post facto research method is adopted in this study. This study looks at oil and gas firms that were 

traded on the Nigerian Exchange Group (NGX) between 2012 and 2022. The study uses a sample of seven firms 
based on data availability. The panel data were sourced from the annual reports of the selected firms. 
 

Table 1. Description of variables. 

Variable Description 

Return on asset (ROA) Ratio of net income to total asset 
Return on equity (ROE) Ratio of net income to total equity 
Board size (Bsize) Total number of board directors 

Board composition (Bcom) Ratio of non-executive directors to total number of directors  
Board independence (Bind) Ratio of independent directors to the total number of directors  

Audit committee characteristics (ACS) Total number of audit committee size 
Firm size (Fsize) Measured as the log of total asset 

 
3.1. Empirical Model  

Panel regression models capture corporate governance's effect on the performance of listed Nigeria oil and gas 
firms. The models were subjected to the Hausman (1978) test to examine whether the regression coefficients in the 
Fixed Effect (FE) and Random Effects (RE) models differ statistically. If the null hypothesis of the Hausman test is 
significant, then the FE is preferable; otherwise, the RE is used. The significance of the p-value of the Hausman test 
statistic supports the choice of the fixed effects estimator over the random effect estimator. The Hausman test 
statistics suggests the use of fixed effect (17.12 and 10.75), which were significant at 1% and 5% significant levels, 
respectively. The models are specified as follows: 

𝑅𝑂𝐴𝑖𝑡  =  𝛽0  +  𝛽1𝐵𝑆𝐼𝑍𝐸𝑖𝑡  +  𝛽2𝐵𝐶𝑂𝑀𝑖𝑡  +  𝛽3𝐵𝐼𝑁𝐷𝑖𝑡  +  𝛽4𝐴𝑈𝐷𝐶𝑂𝑀𝑖𝑡  + 𝛽5𝐹𝑆𝐼𝑍𝐸 +  𝜇𝑖𝑡        (1) 
𝑅𝑂𝐸𝑖𝑡  =  𝛽0  + 𝛽1 𝐵𝑆𝐼𝑍𝐸𝑖𝑡  +  𝛽2𝐵𝐶𝑂𝑀𝑖𝑡  +  𝛽3𝐵𝐼𝑁𝐷𝑖𝑡  + 𝛽4𝐴𝑈𝐷𝐶𝑂𝑀𝑖𝑡  +  𝛽5𝐹𝑆𝐼𝑍𝐸 +  𝜇𝑖𝑡       (2) 

Where t and i are time and the number of firms, respectively, while β0 is the constant term, β1 to β5 are the 

parameters estimated, and ε is the error term. 
 

4. Results 
4.1. Correlation Matrix and Summary Statistics  

Table 2 show that the mean of ROA is 1%, which implies that on average, the oil and gas firms' management in 
Nigeria are inefficient in generating profits from their total assets. The dispersion, measured as the standard 
deviation around the mean, stood at 20.5%. The minimum and maximum values of ROA are -5.8% and 1.51%, 
respectively. This finding implies that some oil and gas firms utilise larger assets to generate profits while others 
use fewer assets to generate their profits.  

The average value of ROE is 23.4% with a deviation of 1.05%. The minimum and maximum values of ROE for 
oil and gas firms are -3.62% and 4.84%, respectively. These findings imply that there is a huge disparity between 
Nigeria oil and gas firms. It shows that some firms do not effectively manage shareholders' wealth while others 
make as much as 4.84% of the stakeholders' investment.  

The average board size for oil and gas firms in Nigeria is approximately 10, while the minimum and maximum 
are 4 and 16, respectively. The deviation from the average is approximately 3 board members. The findings imply 
that the board size of oil and gas firms is not strictly adhering to the corporate governance codes, which require 
quoted firms to have a minimum of 5 board members.  

The average of board composition of oil and gas firms in Nigeria is 42% with a deviation of 23%. However, the 
minimum and maximum number of non-executive members to the total board size is 0% and 100%. This implies 
that the board's composition in Nigeria's oil and gas sector does not adhere to the corporate governance code, 
which stipulates that the board should be composed of a majority of the board as non-executive directors.  

The table also shows that the average of board independence is 15%. The deviation from the mean is 19%, 
while the minimum and maximum number of independent directors are 0% and 56%. Impliedly, the findings of this 
result show that the board's composition contradicts the corporate governance code, which recommends at least 1  
independent director on the board.  

The board's average number of audit committees is 6 members, with a deviation of 1. Also, the minim um and 
maximum number of audit committee size is 3 and 12, respectively. The finding implies a wide disparity among oil 
and gas firms in constituting their audit committees.  

A descriptive analysis of firm size shows that the average size of oil and gas firms is N 6.69 billion with a 
deviation of N 7.05 billion, while the minimum and maximum size of oil and gas firms are N 3278.2 million and N 
2.90 billion, respectively. This implies that oil and gas firms are large. 
 
 
 



Asian Business Research Journal, 2024, 9: 1-6 

4 
© 2024 by the authors; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

 

Table 2. Correlation analysis and descriptive statistics. 
 ROA ROE Bsize Bcom Bind ACS Fsize 

ROA 1.0000 
 

     
ROE 0.5646 1.0000      
BSIZE -0.0397 -0.0066 1     
BCOM -0.0358 -0.0922  1    
BIND 0.0839 0.1085   1   
ACS -0.0224 -0.0754    1  
FSIZE -0.2351 -0.2572     1 
Mean 0.0104651 0.2339286 9.532468 0.4238182 0.1519481 5.942029 6.69 
Std. dev. 0.2049385 1.05243 2.746215 0.2278017 0.1859827 1.327138 7.05 

Min -0.58 -3.62 4 0 0 3 3278.2 
Max 1.51 4.84 16 1 0.56 12 2.90 

 
The result shows that the link between ROA and BSIZE is negative. This implies that an increase in BSIZE 

results to a decrease in ROA. Similarly, the relationship between BSIZE and ROE is negative. The link between 
ROA, BCOM, ACS, and total asset is negative. This implies an increase in BCOM, ACS and FSIZE decrease ROA. 
The result is similar when carried out using ROE. In contrast, the association between BIND and ROA is 
positively correlated. In other words, increasing the sum of independent directors on the board increases the ROA 
and ROE of Nigeria oil and gas firms.  
 

4.2. Empirical Results 
 

Table 3. Regression results. 

Variables  ROA ROE 

Bsize 

0.0217176 
(2.39)** 

0.24764 
(1.50) 

Bcom 

-0.015213 
(-1.16) 

-2.4738 
(-1.4) 

Bind 

-0.028859 
(-2.11)** 

-0.53564 
(-2.08)** 

ACS 

-0.034660 
(-2.88)*** 

-0.41904 
(-2.05)** 

Fsize 

-8.71 
(-0.98) 

-1.32 
(-1.01) 

F-test (Model) 2.78** 1.81 

R2 0.4738 0.1963 

Hausman test 17.12*** 10.75** 

Hettest 13.74*** 6.01*** 

Mean VIF 1.70  

Note:  The standard errors are in parenthesis, while **, *** represent significant 
levels at 5% and 1%, respectively. 

 

5. Discussions 
The result from the first model using ROA shows that the R2 is 47.38% which explains that 47.38% of the 

variations in the financial performance of listed oil and gas firms can be explained by corporate governance (proxy 
as BSIZE, BCOM, BIND, ACS and FSIZE). However, the second model, which proxy financial performa nce as 
ROE, shows that the R2 is 19.6%, implying that the variations in the financial performance of listed oil and gas 
firms can be explained by corporate governance by only 19.6%. The F statistics test was used to show the fitness of 
the models. The findings indicate that the F-statistic of the ROA model is significant at 5%. 

The findings on BSIZE and ROA, was positive and significant. It can be inferred that an increase in the size of 
the board size increases ROA. The finding supports the agency theory, which infers the association between 
owners and management. Hence, increasing shareholder size positively influences agents (managers), which 
increases financial performance. This finding aligns with the study of Sani (2021) and Owolabi et al. (2021) who 
argued that larger boards would likely offer more diversity and expertise while enhancing their oversight capacity, 
resulting in higher performance. On the contrary, Kiptoo et al. (2021) and Olabisi et al. (2018) found that a large 
board has a significant negative effect on ROA. This suggested that companies with larger boards did not 
outperform those with smaller boards. In contrast, when financial performance is proxy by ROE, the result found a 
positive but insignificant effect. This finding aligns with the study of Gatehi and Nasieku (2022)  who found that 
BSIZE had statistically insignificant effects on financial performance. 

The effect of BCOM on the ROA listed oil and gas firms was found to be negative and insignificant. This 
finding corroborates the finding of Sobhan (2021) and Prabowo (2018) who found that the BCOM does not 
significantly impact firm performance. The objective, which assessed the effect of BCOM on the ROE listed oil and 
gas firms, found a significant negative effect. However, Noja et al. (2021) showed that BCOM improves 
performance. Fuzi et al. (2016) argued that the board's non-executive directors cannot perform effectively except 
they are separate from management and make sure to offer objective business judgement. 

The study ascertained the effect of the BIND on the ROA of listed oil and firms’ and found a significant 
negative effect. This finding implies that increasing the independent directors has a negative effect on ROA. This 
finding is similar when using ROE. These findings contradict the claim by Ali and Meah (2021) who argued that an 
independent board strengthens it and reduces the agency problem and the possibility of insider exploitation. The 
board’s independence makes it more dispassionate in their pursuit of auditing financial disclosures. If the board is 
not partial to the executive, the agency conflict between them and the shareholders is mitigated. Also, Hamada and 
Jwailes (2021) argued that the board's independence allows them to take an independent view of the company's 



Asian Business Research Journal, 2024, 9: 1-6 

5 
© 2024 by the authors; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

 

financial reporting process and ensures that executive directors do not dominate the board. According to Ahmad-
Zaluki and Wan-Hussin (2010) board with more members and a higher proportion of independent directors have 
higher forecast accuracy. 

The findings regarding audit committee size and ROA of listed oil and firms’ found a significant negative effect. 
This is similar to the findings using ROE. These findings align with Shehu (2017) and Fariha, Hossain and Ghosh 
(2021) studies that found a significant negative effect. According to Appah and Tebepah (2020), some directors may 
not take part in the audit committee meetings because of  its size, which makes it harder for the committee to make 
decisions together and hurts its ability to perform its duties and consequently affecting financial performance. 
Hamada and Jwailes (2021) argued that a suitable-sized audit committee would enable participants to contribute 
their skills for the benefit of  all parties. They also claimed that firms with smaller audit committees that have more 
financial expertise and experience perform better. In contrast, Onmonya and Ebire (2023) found that ACS do not 
affect financial performance. Additionally, it has been argued that the size of the firm has a significant effect on the 
financial performance of firms’. From the analysis, it is found that firms’ size in both models were insignificant.  

In addition, the residual of the panel regression was subjected to a heteroscedasticity test. Using the Breus ch-
Pagan/Cook-Weisberg test, the null hypothesis which states that there is no heteroscedasticity, was rejected at 1% 
significant level (see Table 3).  

The regression analysis was subjected to a multicollinearity test to detect the presence of collinearity  among 
the variables. The mean Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) is 1.70, which is a lot less than the minimum of 10. The 
VIF for each variable on its own was also quite low. This means that the variables used to explain things in the 
model were not linked to each other. This means that there was no multicollinearity between the variables. 
 

6. Conclusion 
This study examines corporate governance effect on the financial performance of listed Nigeria oil and gas firms 

from 2012 to 2022. The panel data from the sampled firms were analysed using fixed effect estimation. The study 
concludes that the effect of corporate governance on different financial performance measures (ROA and ROE) 
yields different results. Specifically, Board size significantly increases ROA but does not affect the ROE of listed 
Nigeria oil and gas firms. Board composition does not significantly affect the ROA and ROE of listed Nigeria oil 
and gas firms. Increasing independent directors on the board decreases both the ROA and ROE of listed Nigeria oil 
and gas firms at different significant level. A larger audit committee size decreases the ROA and ROE. 

The study recommends that the Security and Exchange Commission should ensure that listed oil and gas firms 
adhere strictly to the required board size since larger board does not influence financial performance. The Security 
and Exchange Commission should ensure that listed oil and gas firms comply with its corporate governance codes 
in the board's composition to influence financial performance. The management of listed oil and gas firms should 
maintain the required atleast one independent director on the board since increasing the number of independent 
directors does not increase financial performance. The management of listed oil and gas firms should limit the audit 
committee size since larger audit committees do not increase financial performance. 

This study focused on corporate governance on financial performance of listed Nigeria oil and gas firms. The 
study provided insight into the novelty of the significance effect of corporate governance on different performance 
indexes. The findings of this study is limited corporate governance (board size, composition, independence, audit 
committee size) on financial performance (ROA and ROE) in oil and gas firms. Future studies can explore other 
sectors, and other corporate governance measures such as board meetings, and gender diversity. 
 
Authors’ Contributions:  
Lucky Onmonya - contributed to framing the topic, drafting the introductory part of the article and reviewing the 
manuscript. Kolawole Ebire - designed the methodology and carried out the analysis of the data as well as writing 
the manuscript. Kehinde Lawal - contributed to framing the topic and drafting the conclusion of the manuscript. 

 
References 
Ahmad-Zaluki, N.A. & Wan-Hussin, W.N. (2010). Corporate governance and earnings forecasts accuracy, Asian Review of Accounting, 18(1), 

50-67. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217341011046006 

Aigbovorhiuwa, T. Adediran, S. A. & Achimugu, A. (2022). Board characteristics and firm performance of quoted insurance companies in 

Nigeria, International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research, 7(5), 1-22. Retrieved from 

http://journals.rcmss.com/index.php/ijpamr/article/view/629  

Ali, M. H. & Meah, M. R. (2021) Factors of audit committee independence: An empirical study from an emerging economy, Cogent Business & 

Management, 8(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1888678 

Appah E, & Tebepah S. F, Audit committee attributes and reporting lag of listed consumer goods firms in Nigeria, International Journal of 

Economic and Financial Management, 5(2) (2020) 2695-1932. https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V9I3P104 

Atty, A.M.A., Moustafasoliman, M. & Youssef, A.E. (2018). The effect of board of directors characteristics on firm’s financia l performance: 

An empirical study on the most active firms in the egyptian stock exchange. Open Access Library Journal, 5, 1-20. 
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104993  

Balagobei, S. & Velnampy, T. (2018). Impact of audit committee on organisational performance of listed hotels and travels in Sri Lanka, 

International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 8(4), 352-369. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v8i4.13467 

Benvolio, J & Ironkwe, U. I. (2022). Board composition and firm performance of quoted commercial banks in Nigeria, International Journal of 

Business Management, 5(1), 19-40. Retrieved from https://gphjournal.org/index.php/bm/article/view/537  

Biase, P. & Onorato, G. (2021). Board characteristics and financial performance in the insurance industry: An international empirical survey, 

Corporate Ownership & Control, 18(3), 8-18. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i3art1  

Borlea, S. N., Achim, M. V. & Mare, C. (2017). Board characteristics and firm performances in emerging economies. Lessons from Romania, 

Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30:1, 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1291359 

Companies and Allied Matters Act (2020). Retrieved from http://www.placng.org/lawsofnigeria/laws/C20.pdf on 24th September 2022 

Daniel, N., Eguasa, B. E. & Excellence, B. (2021). Audit committee and financial performance of listed firms in Nigeria, International Journal 

of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(12), 307-313. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v5y2021i12p307-

313.html  

http://journals.rcmss.com/index.php/ijpamr/article/view/629
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104993
https://gphjournal.org/index.php/bm/article/view/537
http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i3art1
http://www.placng.org/lawsofnigeria/laws/C20.pdf%20on%2024th%20September%202022
https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v5y2021i12p307-313.html
https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v5y2021i12p307-313.html


Asian Business Research Journal, 2024, 9: 1-6 

6 
© 2024 by the authors; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

 

Eseoghene, O. & Oghenevwogaga, O. (2021). Does audit committee characteristics drive financial performance? A case of Nigerian service 

Firms, Gusau International Journal of Management and Social Sciences , 4(1), 1-13. Retrieved from 

https://gijmss.com.ng/index.php/gijmss/article/view/30  

Fuzi, S. F. S., Halim, S. A. A., & Julizaerma, M. K. (2016). Board independence and corporate performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 

460–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S22125671(16)30152-6 

Gatehi, G. T. & Nasieku, T. (2022). Effect of board characteristics on financial performance of non-financial firms listed at the Nairobi 

Securities Exchange, Advanced Journal of Social Science, 11(1), 1-12.https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.11.1.1-12 

Habtoor, O. S. (2022). Board attributes and bank performance in light of Saudi corporate governance regulations, Journal of Risk and 

Financial Management, 15, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15100441 

Hamada, R. & Jwailes, A. R. (2021). The effect of audit committee characteristics (committee size, committee independence, committee 

gender diversity, committee frequency of meetings on Jordanian firm performance TQ, Journal of Business Management, 7(10), 14-32. 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/bm.v7i10.4659 

Iheyen, C. (2021). Audit committee attributes and the value of firm: Evidence from listed insurance companies in Nigeria, Journal of 

Contemporary Issues in Accounting, 2(1), 21-35. Available at https://journals.unizik.edu.ng/jocia     

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm, managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of 

Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X 

Kanakriyah, R. (2021). The impact of board of directors’ characteristics on firm performance: A case study in Jordan, Journal of Asian Finance, 

Economics and Business, 8(3), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0341 
Kehinde, O., Segun, K., Ibidunni, & Kehinde, B. (2021). Corporate governance implementation in Nigeria's oil and gas sector: investigating 

the influence of regulatory compliance on environmental sustainability, Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 25(1), 
1-10. Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Corporate-Governance-Implementation-In-Nigerias-Oil-And-Gas-

Sector-1528-2635-25-SI-1-662.pdf  

Kiptoo, I. K., Kariuki, S. N. & Ocharo, K. N. (2021) Corporate governance and financial performance of insurance firms in Kenya, Cogent 

Business & Management, 8(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1938350 

Noja, G. G., Thalassinos, E., Cristea, M. & Grecu, I. M. (2021). The interplay between board characteristics, financial performance, and risk 

management disclosure in the financial services sector: new empirical evidence from Europe. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 

14(79). https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jrfm14020079 

Okeke, P. C. (2021). Audit committee attributes and corporate performance: evidence from selected manufacturing firms in Nigeria, European 

Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 9(9), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.37745/ejaafr.2013 
Okolie, A. O. & Ogbaragu, J. S. (2022). Audit committee effectiveness and corporate financial performance of quoted deposit money banks in 

Nigeria, International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 9(3), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-

V9I3P104 

Olabisi, J., Kajola, S. O., Oladejo, D. A., Ojeaga, P.I., & Abass, T. F. (2018). Board characteristics and performance of quoted consumer goods 

firms: Evidence from Nigeria, Journal of Economics and Business Research, 2, 7-26. Retrieved from 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345217849_Board_Characteristics_and_Performance_of_Quoted_Consumer_Goods_Fir

ms_Evidence_from_Nigeria  

Olayinka, O. M. (2019). Audit committee and firms’ performance in Nigeria: case study o f selected Nigerian banks. International Journal of 

Scientific and Research Publications, 9 (9). 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.9.09.2019.p9315 
Onmonya, L. O. & Ebire, K. (2023). Audit committee characteristics and corporate performance: Evidence from listed conglomerates in 

Nigeria, Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 23(17), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEBA/2023/v23i171047 

Owolabi, T. J., Bamisaye, T. O., Efuntade, A. O., & Efuntade, I. O. (2021). Board diversity and financial performance of quoted firms in 

Nigeria. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research , 5(10), 46-62. Retrieved from 

https://scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3568430  

Oyedekun, G. O. (2019). Board characteristics and financial performance of commercial banks in Nigeria. Accounting and Taxation Review, 

3(2), 31-48. https://hdl.handle.net/11159/4427 

Prabowo, M. A. (2018). Board characteristics and accounting performance in the banking industry: The Indonesian experience. Jurnal 

Keuangan dan Perbankan, 22(1): 114-126. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v22i1.1742 

Sani, A. (2021). Board diversity and financial performance of the Nigerian listed firms: A dynamic panel analysis. Journal of Accounting and 

Business Education, 6(1),1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.26675/jabe.v6i1.18817 

Shehu, Z. (2017). Effect of audit committee characteristics and ownership structure on financial performance of listed oil and gas firms in 

Nigeria. Master of Science Dissertation, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. Retrieved from 

https://kubanni.abu.edu.ng/items/e85289cc-bf64-4b48-9e62-6847b9a126a1/full  

Sobhan, R. (2021). Board characteristics and firm performance: evidence from the listed non-banking financial institutions of Bangladesh, 

International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 8(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4589504 

Ukemenam, A. I., Ezike, I. B. & Chijioke, I. F. (2019). Board composition and firm performance: Evidence from Nigeria, Journal of 

Management and Economic Studies, 1(5):  33-40. https://doi.org/10.26677/TR1010.2019.134 

Wobo, H. O. & Ibanichuka, E. A. (2021). Effect of audit committee on the performance of deposit money banks in Nigeria, International 

Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 9(1), 669-675. Retrieved from https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/effect-of-
audit-committee-on-the-performance-of-deposit-money-banks-in-nigeria 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Eastern Centre of Science and Education is not responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability, etc. caused in relation to/arising out of the  u se  
of the content. Any queries should be directed to the corresponding author of the article. 

 

https://gijmss.com.ng/index.php/gijmss/article/view/30
https://doi.org/10.1016/S22125671(16)30152-6
https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.11.1.1-12
https://doi.org/10.53555/bm.v7i10.4659
https://journals.unizik.edu.ng/jocia
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Corporate-Governance-Implementation-In-Nigerias-Oil-And-Gas-Sector-1528-2635-25-SI-1-662.pdf
https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Corporate-Governance-Implementation-In-Nigerias-Oil-And-Gas-Sector-1528-2635-25-SI-1-662.pdf
https://doi.org/10.37745/ejaafr.2013
https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V9I3P104
https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V9I3P104
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345217849_Board_Characteristics_and_Performance_of_Quoted_Consumer_Goods_Firms_Evidence_from_Nigeria
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345217849_Board_Characteristics_and_Performance_of_Quoted_Consumer_Goods_Firms_Evidence_from_Nigeria
http://dx.doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.9.09.2019.p9315
https://scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3568430
https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v22i1.1742
https://kubanni.abu.edu.ng/items/e85289cc-bf64-4b48-9e62-6847b9a126a1/full

