







































 
 

39 
© 2023 by the author; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

Asian Business Research Journal 
Vol. 9, 39-44, 2024 
ISSN: 2576-6759 
DOI: 10.55220/25766759.174 
© 2024 by the author; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 
 

 

 
Examining the intersection of national health policy and the delivery of emergency 
healthcare services in the Gambia 

 
OGBETA, Kingsley Oghenekevwe 
 

 
 

Department of Management Sciences, School of Business and Public Administration, University of the Gambia, Gambia. 
Email: kogbeta@utg.edu.gm  

 

 
Abstract 

This study examined the intersection of National Health Policy and the delivery of emergency 
healthcare services in The Gambia (EHCS). It evaluated the influence of The Gambia National 
Health Policies (2015 and 2020) on EHCS, probed the relationship between the NHP and EHCS, 
and identified challenges in emergency healthcare provision. A survey research design was 
adopted, gathering data through questionnaires. Out of a population of 1,955, (321) were chosen 
as the sample size based on Krejcie and Morgan's (1970) formula. Stage sampling was adopted, 
and proportionate to size determined respondents in each stratum while questionnaires were 
randomly distributed. On the challenges, findings revealed a predominantly negative perception of 
equipment adequacy (mean score: 2.6) and a discernible concern regarding the number of trained 
professionals (mean score: 2.2). Patient satisfaction was ambivalent (mean score: 2.4), while service 
quality improvement post-policy implementation received mixed reviews (mean score: 2.9). 

Hypothesis one revealed that Policy Framework and Objectives significantly improve EHCS (β = 

0.832, p < 0.001), with Resource Allocation also having a positive impact (β = 0.093, p = 0.003). 
However, Policy Implementation and Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisms were not 
significant. Hypothesis two showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.858, p = 0.000) between 
NHP and EHCS. Recommendations include improving equipment adequacy, increasing training 
for healthcare professionals, and developing patient-centered approaches. The study concludes 
that National Health Policies impact emergency healthcare services in The Gambia. 

 
Keywords: Emergency care, Health policy, Primary health care, Public Service delivery, Sustainable Development Goals. 

 
1. Introduction 

Primary health care, a cornerstone for combating high mortality rates, ensures essential medical services are 
accessible to all. Rooted in international mandates such as the Constitution of the World Health Organization 
(1946) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), every individual's right to health care is globally 
recognised. An integral component is emergency care, which addresses acute illnesses and injuries and is 
emphasised in frameworks like the Sustainable Development Goals (United Nations, 2015). 

Despite The Gambia's commitment to these principles, as reflected in Chapter 10, Article 216(4) of the 1997 
Constitution and other health policies, including The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (2015) and Ministry of 
Health and Social Welfare. (2020), challenges persist. 

Preliminary observations suggest significant gaps in emergency healthcare delivery, with many citizens either 
unaware of or unable to access quality services. Vulnerable groups are particularly affected, including women, 
children, and the differently-abled. Moreover, the country grapples with systemic challenges in its health delivery 
system, from infrastructure to human resources (Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, 2020). 

This research aims to critically examine emergency healthcare services through the lens of the Gambia 
national health policies. The central inquiry revolves around evaluating the degree to which The Gambia National 
Health Policies (2015 and 2020) have enhanced emergency healthcare services in the country, to examine the 
relationship between national health policy and emergency healthcare provision in The Gambia, and to investigate 
the challenges militating against the provision of emergency healthcare services in The Gambia.  The research 
hypotheses are H1: The Gambia National Health Policies (2015 and 2020) has significant effect on the provision of 
emergency healthcare services, H0: National Health Policy has no significant relationship with the provision of 
emergency healthcare services in The Gambia. The scope of the study includes public works, law enforcement, 
health, safety, and disaster management. This research narrows its lens to "National Health Policy and Delivery of 
Emergency Healthcare Services in The Gambia." It specifically examines the Ministry of Health and Social 
Welfare (MoHSW) and the Directorate of Health Services in the West Coast Region (WCR) 1 Regional Health 
Department (RHD). The WCR1 RHD includes The Gambia's capital, Banjul, and surrounding areas within the 
Kanifing Municipal Council, often called Kombo St. Mary Division. The investigation spans October 2022 to 
December 2023, based on the accessibility of patient records. 

mailto:kogbeta@utg.edu.gm
https://www.doi.org/10.55220/25766759.174


Asian Business Research Journal, 2024, 9: 39-44 

40 
© 2023 by the author; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

 

1.1. Literature Review on the Intersection of Primary Health Care, Emergency Care, Health Policy, Public Service 
Delivery, And Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) In the Gambia 

The healthcare system in The Gambia, like in many developing nations, encounters numerous challenges that 
affect its effectiveness, accessibility, and sustainability. This literature review examines the intersection of primary 
health care (PHC), emergency care, health policy, public service delivery, and the Sustainable Development Goals 
(SDGs) in the context of The Gambia, drawing on a scope of scholarly and policy sources. Primary health care 
(PHC) is a holistic and affordable approach to health services that aims to present comprehensive, community-
based care concentrated on prevention, wellness, and the treatment of common illnesses and conditions. Rooted in 
principles of equity, participation, and intersectoral cooperation, PHC addresses the more expansive determinants 
of health and underscores the importance of health promotion and disease prevention. It is designed to be the first 
point of contact within the healthcare system, providing that individuals receive essential health services close to 
where they live and work. PHC includes a wide range of services, including immunisations, maternal and child 
health care, management of chronic diseases, mental health services, and health education. By concentrating on 
primary prevention and early intervention, PHC aims to decrease the demand for more complex and costly 
secondary and tertiary care, ultimately contributing to better health outcomes and greater health equity. 
Therefore, primary health care (PHC) is foundational to any healthcare system, underlining accessibility, 
affordability, and comprehensive care. The Gambia’s PHC system aims to provide essential health services at the 
community level. According to the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (2015, 2020), national health policies 
have concentrated on strengthening PHC to enhance health outcomes and prevent diseases. This approach aligns 
with Bertalanffy's (1969) system theory, which underscores the importance of interconnected components in a 
system working harmoniously to achieve optimal outcomes. However, emergency care in The Gambia encounters 
substantial resource constraints, affecting its ability to deliver timely and adequate services (Ministry of Health and 
Social Welfare, 2020). Burkholder, Bergquist, and Wallis (2020) underscore the governance challenges in accessing 
emergency care in Africa, noting that limited infrastructure and trained personnel are common barriers. Harveen 
and Bergquist (2020) further highlight the necessity for efficient service delivery mechanisms in low-resource 
settings. Kannan et al. (2020) concentrate on the quality of emergency care systems in Africa, advocating for 
comprehensive strategies to enhance care delivery. Consequently, health policies in The Gambia are integral in 
shaping the healthcare landscape, particularly concerning PHC and emergency care. Easton’s (1953) political 
system theory provides a framework for understanding how health policies are formulated and implemented. The 
Gambia’s health policies, as documented by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (2015, 2020), aim to enhance 
healthcare delivery through strategic planning, resource allocation, and stakeholder engagement. Nevertheless, 
there are gaps in policy implementation that require to be addressed to achieve desired health outcomes. Moreover, 
effective public service delivery is essential for guaranteeing that health services reach all segments of the 
population, especially in pastoral and underserved areas. Emerson (2020) examines the significance of public 
service in achieving the UN SDGs, underscoring that efficient service delivery mechanisms are necessary for 
meeting health targets. Ouma (2018) identifies physical access barriers to emergency care in sub-Saharan Africa, 
stressing the demand for enhanced infrastructure and transportation systems. Additionally, the SDGs present a 
global framework for improving health and well-being, with Goal 3 specifically targeting health outcomes. The 
Gambia’s commitment to the SDGs involves integrating these goals into national health policies and programs 
(United Nations, 2015). Aligning health initiatives with SDG targets guarantees that actions contribute to 
sustainable development, fostering long-term health advancements. 
 

1.2. Empirical Evidence 
Firstly, Kannan et al. (2020) considered emergency care quality in Africa using mixed methods, identifying 

disparities such as inadequate infrastructure and training. They recommended standardised training, infrastructure 
investment, and regional collaborations to improve care. Similarly, Burkholder, Bergquist, and Wallis (2020) 
examined governance issues in accessing emergency care through qualitative interviews and policy reviews, finding 
challenges like fragmented policy implementation and insufficient funding. They called for stronger governance, 
better funding mechanisms, and stakeholder coordination. Additionally, Taylor and Burkholder (2019) investigated 
emergency care systems from a human rights perspective using a rights-based framework and case studies, 
advocating for human rights principles in national health policies to enhance care access. In another study, Taylor 
and Burkholder (2021) reviewed national constitutions globally to evaluate emergency care provisions, finding few 
clear guarantees for emergency care. They recommended constitutional amendments to include the right to 
emergency care and clearer legal definitions. 

Furthermore, Ouma (2018) investigated physical barriers to emergency care in Sub-Saharan Africa using 
spatial analysis and field surveys, revealing considerable access gaps due to inadequate infrastructure. Ouma 
recommended strategically locating additional facilities and improving transportation infrastructure. Finally, 
Harveen and Bergquist (2020) investigated emergency treatment in low-resource settings using a systematic 
review and case studies, revealing issues such as insufficient resources and inadequate training. They suggested 
scaling up successful innovations, investing in training and infrastructure, and increasing international 
collaboration. 

In summary, these studies collectively underscore the demand for comprehensive policy reforms, increased 
investment, and innovative approaches to address pressing problems in emergency care systems across Africa, 
including governance, quality, access, and human rights. 
 

1.3. Theoretical Base 
This study is anchored in System Theory, initially proposed and popularised by Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1969) 

and redefined in the context of public administration by Easton, David in 1953. System Theory examines how an 
entity interacts with and responds to its environment, with policy decisions being dynamically shaped by inputs 
and yielding specific outputs, thus forming a feedback loop (Bunge, 2004). Consequently, this theory provides a 



Asian Business Research Journal, 2024, 9: 39-44 

41 
© 2023 by the author; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

 

framework for understanding how various components of a healthcare system, such as primary health care (PHC), 
emergency care, and health policy, interact and impact one another. 

In the context of The Gambia, the healthcare system is managed by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare 
under the motto "Health for Wealth." This system is structured into three directorates with the Department of 
State for Health and Social Welfare overseeing this domain, the Policy Analysis Unit plays a critical role in shaping 
policies based on expert insights and local studies. Moreover, the Directorate of Planning and Information 
coordinates these policy efforts, thus guaranteeing that they are effectively integrated. 

Therefore, System Theory is relevant to this study as it offers a holistic view of how different healthcare 
components interact within The Gambia’s healthcare system. It helps in analysing how changes in one area, such 
as emergency care, influence other components, including PHC and overall service delivery. Additionally, the 
theory aids in evaluating the effectiveness of health policies and their alignment with the Sustainable Development 
Goals (SDGs). However, System Theory also faces certain criticisms. For instance, it may oversimplify complex 
systems by focusing broadly on interactions rather than specific details. Moreover, measuring these interactions 
and overall effectiveness can be challenging, as the theory often relies on qualitative assessments. Furthermore, 
System Theory may not fully account for external factors such as socioeconomic conditions and political influences, 
and applying it practically can be complex due to the intricacy of systems. 

Overall, despite these criticisms, System Theory remains a valuable tool for examining The Gambia’s 
healthcare system, providing an understanding of the integration and interaction of various components and their 
alignment with more expansive health goals. 
 

2. Methodology 
This study adopted exploratory and survey techniques. Data is sourced directly via questionnaires and 

indirectly from established records and publications. The questionnaires are curated to capture respondent views 
on the policy's impact to enrich the overall understanding. Based on Krejcie and Morgan's (1970) formula, the 
study samples of 321 participants was drawn from a population of 1,955, encompassing 87 management staff from 
the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MoHSW), 1,096 frontline healthcare workers from West Coast Region 
(WCR) 1 Regional Health Department (RHD), and 772 patients under the review period (October 2022 to 
December 2023). The study used staged sampling and the management staff members from the MoHSW, frontline 
healthcare workers, and patients under the review period was identified as individual strata. Proportionate to size 
sampling was used to determine the number of respondents in each strata while random sampling was use in the 
administration of questionnaires. The research identifies two pivotal variables: the national health policy 
(independent) and the emergency healthcare services (dependent), aiming to elucidate their interrelationship. 
Indicators of National Health Policy (Independent Variable) include policy framework and objectives, resource 
allocation, policy implementation, and monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, while the indicators of Emergency 
Healthcare Services (dependent variable) are service availability and accessibility, quality of care, and workforce 
and training. The control variables of this study are socioeconomic factors, geographic and demographic factors, 
and healthcare infrastructure. Finally, the gathered data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics 
(multiple regression and correlation analysis to test the hypotheses one and two respectively) to draw conclusions 
in alignment with the study's objectives. The administration of questionnaires lasted for two months. 
 

2.1. The Intersection of National Health Policy and the Delivery of Emergency Healthcare Services in The Gambia: 
A Quantitative Analysis.  

Of the 321 questionnaires disseminated, 287 were received back, constituting 89% of the total. The outstanding 
34 questionnaires, which make up 11%, were not returned. 
 

2.2. The Challenges Militating Against the Provision of Emergency Healthcare Services in The Gambia. 
In assessing the challenges and perceptions of emergency healthcare services in The Gambia, 287 respondents 

weighed in on several critical items as displayed in Table 1 below. On the adequacy of equipment in emergency 
healthcare facilities, twenty-one (21) respondents (7.32%) strongly agreed that the facilities are suitably equipped 
with modern medical tools, while 45 respondents (15.68%) agreed with this sentiment. A minority of 15 
respondents (5.23%) remained undecided. Seventy-nine (79) individuals (27.53%) disagreed with the statement, 
while alarmingly, the majority, with 127 respondents (44.24%), strongly disagreed. The average perception score 
for this item stood at 2.6, revealing a predominant negative sentiment about the equipment's adequacy. 

Regarding the sufficiency of trained emergency healthcare professionals, 84 respondents (29.27%) expressed 
strong agreement, while 47 individuals (16.38%) agreed. Only nine respondents (3.14%) were undecided on the 
matter. A comparable number of respondents disagreed (78 or 27.18%) and strongly disagreed (69 or 24.03%). 
With a mean score of 2.2, there is a discernible concern about the number of proficient professionals in emergency 
healthcare. 

On the general satisfaction of patients with emergency healthcare services, 67 respondents (23.34%) strongly 
felt that patients are generally content, while a slightly higher number, 83 respondents (28.92%), agreed. A 
minuscule seven individuals (2.44%) remained neutral. Eighty-six respondents (29.97%) disagreed, while 44 
(15.33%) strongly disagreed. The mean score for this item was 2.4, indicating ambivalent feelings regarding patient 
satisfaction. 

Considering the improvement in service quality since the policy implementations, 90 respondents (31.36%) 
strongly believed there had been a significant quality boost, while 60 individuals (20.91%) agreed. Eighteen 
respondents (6.27%) were on the fence. 57 (19.86%) disagreed, and 62 (21.60%) strongly disagreed. This item's 
average score of 2.9 suggests a mildly positive but divided perception of service quality improvement post-policy 
implementation. 

On the effectiveness of the 2015 and 2020 health policy implementations in emergency healthcare centers, 92 
respondents (32.06%) voiced strong agreement, while 68 (23.69%) agreed. Only six individuals (2.09%) remained 



Asian Business Research Journal, 2024, 9: 39-44 

42 
© 2023 by the author; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

 

undecided. Eighty-one respondents (28.22%) expressed disagreement, while 40 (13.94%) strongly disagreed. This 
item's mean score was 2.3, painting a somewhat positive yet mixed picture of the policy's effectiveness. 
In wrapping up the survey's findings, the grand mean of 2.48 indicates a lukewarm, leaning slightly negative, 
perception of emergency healthcare services in The Gambia when aggregating all the items. 
 

Table 1. Respondents' views on the challenges militating against the provision of emergency healthcare services in The Gambia. 

Challenges SA A U D SD Total Mean 

The emergency healthcare facilities in The Gambia 
are adequately equipped with modern medical 
instruments. 

21 
-7.32 

45 
-15.68 

15 
-5.23 

79 
-27.53 

127 
-44.24 

287 
-100 

2.6 

There is a sufficient number of trained emergency 
healthcare professionals in The Gambia. 

84 
-29.27 

47 
-16.38 

9 
-3.14 

78 
-27.18 

69 
-24.03 

287 
-100 

2.2 

Patients are generally satisfied with the emergency 
healthcare services they receive in The Gambia. 

67 
-23.34 

83 
-28.92 

7 
-2.44 

86 
-29.97 

44 
-15.33 

287 
-100 

2.4 

There has been a noticeable increase in the quality 
of emergency healthcare services since the 
implementation of the Gambia National Health 
Policies. 

90 
-31.36 

60 
-20.91 

18 
-6.27 

57 
-19.86 

62 
-21.6 

287 
-100 

2.9 

The Gambia National Health Policies (2015 and 
2020) are effectively implemented in emergency 
healthcare centres. 

92 
-32.06 

68 
-23.69 

6 
-2.09 

81 
-28.22 

40 
-13.94 

287 
100 

2.3 

Grand mean  2.48 
Source:  Fieldwork, (July, 2024).  

 
2.3. Test of Hypothesis One 

H1: The Gambia National Health Policies (2015 and 2020) has significant effect on the provision of emergency healthcare 
services. 

In the analysis of Table 2 Policy Framework and Objectives emerge as a strong predictor of Emergency 

Healthcare Services, with a significant positive impact (β = 0.832, p < 0.001). This analysis indicates that a well-
defined health policy framework significantly improves emergency care services. Resource Allocation, while 

positively impacting Emergency Healthcare Services (β = 0.093, p = 0.003), shows a more moderate effect 
compared to Policy Framework and Objectives. Therefore, increasing resource allocation contributes to enhanced 
emergency care, though not as strongly as policy clarity. In contrast, Policy Implementation and Monitoring and 
Evaluation Mechanisms did not show a significant effect on Emergency Healthcare Services, with both variables 
showing non-significant results (p = 1.000). Thus, despite their significance in theory, these factors do not 
independently affect emergency care outcomes in The Gambia. 
 

Table 2. Coefficientsa 

Model 

Unstandardized 
coefficients 

Standardized 
coefficients 

t Sig. B Std. error Beta 

1 (Constant) -3.236E-16 0.074  0.000 1.000 
Policy framework and objectives 0.768 0.038 0.832 20.145 0.000 
Resource allocation 0.232 0.078 0.093 2.974 0.003 
Policy implementation 1.625E-15 0.038 0.000 0.000 1.000 
Monitoring and evaluation mechanisms -1.748E-15 0.043 0.000 0.000 1.000 

Note: a. Dependent Variable: Emergency Healthcare Services 

 
The ANOVA results in Table 3 revealed that the multiple regression model significantly describes the 

variability in Emergency Healthcare Services, with the regression sum of squares at 35.745 highlighting the 
model's explanatory power. In comparison, the residual sum of squares is 12.290, reflecting the portion of 
variability not accounted for by the model. The total variability, measured by the total sum of squares, is 48.035. 
The mean square for regression is 8.936, indicating the model's fit relative to the residual variability, with a mean 
square of 0.044. Consequently, the high F-statistic of 205.049 underlines the model’s effectiveness, while the 
significance value of 0.000 affirms that the predictors significantly impact Emergency Healthcare Services. Thus, 
the model, incorporating Policy Framework and Objectives, Resource Allocation, Policy Implementation, and 
Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisms, is statistically significant and effectively accounts for variations in 
emergency care services. 

 
Table 3. ANOVAa 

Model Sum of squares Df Mean square F Sig. 

1 Regression 35.745 4 8.936 205.049 .000b 
Residual 12.290 282 .044   
Total 48.035 286    

Note:  
 

a. Dependent Variable: Emergency Healthcare Services 
b. Predictors: (Constant), Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisms, Resource Allocation, Policy Framework and Objectives, Policy 
Implementation. 

 
2.4. Test of Hypothesis Two 

H0: National Health Policy has no significant relationship with the provision of emergency healthcare services in The 
Gambia. 

Table 4 correlation analysis shows a strong positive relationship between National Health Policy and 
Emergency Healthcare Services. Specifically, the Pearson correlation coefficient of .858 demonstrates that as the 
effectiveness and implementation of the National Health Policy improve, there is a corresponding significant 



Asian Business Research Journal, 2024, 9: 39-44 

43 
© 2023 by the author; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

 

improvement in the delivery of Emergency Healthcare Services. This correlation is statistically significant, as 
evidenced by the significance level (Sig. (2-tailed)) of .000, well below the 0.01 threshold, affirming that the 
observed relationship is not due to chance. The sample size (N) for both variables is 287, guaranteeing a robust and 
reliable analysis. Therefore, the data suggests that improvements in the National Health Policy are closely 
associated with better emergency healthcare services in The Gambia. 
 

Table 4. Correlations. 

 National 
health policy 

Emergency healthcare 
services 

National health policy Pearson correlation 1 0.858** 
Sig. (2-tailed)  0.000 
N 287 287 

Emergency healthcare services Pearson correlation 0.858** 1 
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000  
N 287 287 

Note:  **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 

 

3. Discussion of Findings 
This study examined the intersection of National Health Policy and Emergency Healthcare Services in The 

Gambia, focusing on the impact of the 2015 and 2020 health policies. Considering the challenges and perceptions of 
emergency healthcare services, 287 respondents provided crucial insights. Concerning the adequacy of equipment 
in emergency healthcare facilities, only 7.32% strongly agreed that the facilities are well-equipped, whereas 44.24% 
strongly disagreed, implying a prevailing negative sentiment with a mean score of 2.6. This finding resonates with 
the findings of Kannan et al. (2020). Regarding the sufficiency of trained emergency healthcare professionals, only 
29.27% strongly agreed there are enough trained professionals, whereas 24.03% strongly disagreed, resulting in a 
mean score of 2.2. This finding aligns with Burkholder, Bergquist, and Wallis (2020), who underscored the critical 
inadequacy of skilled healthcare workers as a significant obstacle in similar contexts. 

Moreover, on the general satisfaction of patients with emergency healthcare services, about 23.34% strongly 
felt patients were satisfied, while 29.97% disagreed, leading to a mean score of 2.4, reflecting ambivalence. Taylor 
and Burkholder (2019) stress that patient satisfaction is important for evaluating healthcare service quality, further 
underlining the mixed feelings observed in this study. 

Considering the improvement in service quality since the policy implementations, approximately 31.36% 
strongly believed in service quality improvement post-policy implementation, with an average score of 2.9, 
demonstrating a mildly positive but divided perception. Taylor and Burkholder (2021) note that effective policy 
implementation can significantly improve service quality, corroborating the positive but varied responses observed. 
Regarding the effectiveness of the 2015 and 2020 health policy implementations, around 32.06% strongly agreed 
on policy effectiveness, but 28.22% disagreed, yielding a mean score of 2.3, suggesting mixed views. Ouma (2018) 
stressed similar findings in another context, where policy implementation effectiveness was perceived differently 
across various stakeholders. The overall grand mean of 2.48 shows a slightly negative perception of emergency 
healthcare services. Harveen and Bergquist (2020) also found that stakeholder perceptions can significantly affect 
the perceived effectiveness of healthcare services, supporting the slightly negative sentiment observed. 

On hypothesis one, the analysis in Table 2 shows that Policy Framework and Objectives significantly improve 

emergency services (β = 0.832, p < 0.001). Resource Allocation also positively impacts services (β = 0.093, p = 
0.003), though to a lesser extent. However, Policy Implementation and Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisms 
were not significant (p = 1.000). These results are in line with Taylor and Burkholder (2021), who found that well-
defined policy frameworks are essential for enhancing healthcare services. The ANOVA model significantly 
explains variability in emergency services (F = 205.049, p = 0.000), affirming the predictors' significant impact. 
This is consistent with findings by Burkholder, Bergquist, and Wallis (2020),  

who underlined the importance of policy frameworks and resource allocation in healthcare. 
Concerning hypothesis two, Table 4 revealed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.858, p = 0.000) between 

National Health Policy and Emergency Healthcare Services, implying that improvements in health policy are 
closely connected to better emergency services in The Gambia. This finding aligns with Kannan et al. (2020) and 
Ouma (2018), who underscored the essential role of effective health policies in improving healthcare service 
delivery. 
 

4. Recommendations/Policy Implications 
Based on the Findings of This Study, The Following Recommendations and Policy Implications Emerge to Improve the 

Delivery of Emergency Healthcare Services in the Gambia. 
Strengthen Policy Framework and Objectives: 

• Regularly review and update health policies with clear, actionable goals. 

• Align policies with current healthcare conditions and global best practices. 
Increase Resource Allocation: 

• Prioritise and increase funding for emergency healthcare infrastructure and supplies. 

• Invest in modern medical equipment to address current inadequacies. 
Enhance Training and Capacity Building: 

• Invest in training programs and continuous professional development for healthcare workers. 

• Partner with international organisations for additional training resources. 
Improve Policy Implementation and Monitoring: 

• Establish clear procedures and timelines for policy implementation. 

• Develop an integrated monitoring system to track policy effectiveness. 
Enhance Patient Satisfaction and Engagement: 



Asian Business Research Journal, 2024, 9: 39-44 

44 
© 2023 by the author; licensee Eastern Centre of Science and Education, USA 

 

 

• Concentrate on delivering patient-centered care with better communication and responsiveness. 

• Involve patients and the community in health policy discussions. 
Leverage Data and Technology: 

• Use health information systems for data-driven decision-making. 

• Implement telemedicine and mobile health solutions to improve service delivery. 
These recommendations need collective action from the government, healthcare providers, and stakeholders to 

enhance emergency healthcare services in The Gambia, leading to better health effects. 
 

5. Conclusion 
This study examined the intersection of National Health Policy and the delivery of emergency healthcare 

services in The Gambia through a quantitative analysis. The findings revealed a significant understanding of the 
influence of health policy on emergency services, underlining key areas for improvement. The study demonstrated 
that a well-defined policy framework and increased resource allocation positively influence the quality and 
availability of emergency healthcare services. However, challenges remain, particularly in the adequacy of medical 
equipment and the number of trained professionals.  

The analysis also underscored the importance of effective policy implementation and robust monitoring 
mechanisms, even though these factors did not independently show significant effects in the current context. The 
correlation between national health policy and emergency healthcare services was strong, affirming that 
advancements in policy can lead to better service delivery. 

To improve emergency healthcare services in The Gambia, the government and stakeholders must focus on 
strengthening the policy framework, increasing resource allocation, improving training and capacity building, and 
improving policy implementation and monitoring. By addressing these areas, The Gambia can enhance its 
emergency healthcare infrastructure and outcomes, ultimately leading to better health for its population. 
 

References 
Bertalanffy, L. V. (1969) The system theory: Foundation, development, application. New York: George Braziller. 
Bunge, M. (2004) Matérialisme et humanisme: Pour surmonter la crise de la pensée. Montreal: Liber. 
Burkholder, T. W., Bergquist, H. B. and Wallis, L. A. (2020) ‘Governing access to emergency care in Africa’,  African Journal of Emergency 

Medicine, 10(2), pp. 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2020.07.003 
Easton, D. (1953) The political system: An inquiry into the state of political science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 
Emerson, A. J. (2020) ‘Importance of the public service in achieving the UN SDGs’, Decent Work and Economic Growth, 3(6), pp. 6-22. 
Government of The Gambia. (1997) Constitution of The Gambia. Banjul: Government of The Gambia. 
Government of The Gambia. (2018) Gambia national development plan 2018-2021. Banjul: Government of The Gambia. 
Harveen, B. and Bergquist, T. B. (2020) ‘Considerations for service delivery for emergency care in low resource settings’, African Journal of 

Emergency Medicine, 2(6), pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2020.07.002 
Junaid, A. and Razzak, A. L. (2002) ‘Emergency medical care in developing countries: Is it worthwhile?’, Bulletin of the World Health 

Organization, 80(11) pp. 900-905. 
Kannan, V. C. et al. (2020) ‘Emergency care systems in Africa: A focus on quality’, African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 10(2), pp. 65-72. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2020.04.010 
Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. (1970) ‘Determining sample size for research activities’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, pp. 

607-610. 
Migdal, J. S. (2001) State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. (2015) Gambia national health policy 2011-2015. Banjul: Government of The Gambia. 
Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. (2020) Gambia national health policy 2012-2020. Banjul: Government of The Gambia. 
Ouma, P. (2018) ‘Gaps in physical access to emergency care in sub-Saharan Africa’, The Lancet Global Health, pp. e240-e241. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30026-3 
Taylor, W. and Burkholder, K. H. (2019) ‘Developing emergency care systems: A human rights-based approach’, Bulletin of the World Health 

Organization, pp. 612-619. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.18.226605 
Taylor, W. and Burkholder, M. R. (2021) ‘A global review of provisions on emergency care in national constitutions’, Health and Human 

Rights Journal, 23(2) pp. 1-2. 
United Nations. (1948) Universal declaration of human rights. San Jose: Inter-American Institute for Human Rights. 
United Nations. (2015) United Nations. Available at: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/ (Accessed: 14 July 2024). 
World Health Organization and United States. (1946) Constitution of the world health organization basic documents, forty-fifth edition, supplement. 

Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of State. 
World Health Organization. (2017) World health organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-

rights-and-health (Accessed: 14 July 2024). 
World Health Organization. (2019) Seventy-second world health assembly. Resolutions and decisions WHA72/2019/REC/1. Geneva: World 

Health Organization. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-rights-and-health
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-rights-and-health

