EFFECT OF SELECTED INSECTICIDE ON WHITEFLY (Bemisia tabaci) INFESTING BRINJAL PLANTS


© 2016 Asian Economic and Social Society. All rights reserved 

ISSN (P): 2304-1455/ISSN (E):2224-4433 

Volume 6(11), 210-220 

210 

 

 

 

IN VIVO PROPAGATION OF POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.) 

CULTIVARS 
 

Farhat Ali Khan
 
and Shabana Irum 

Department of Botany, Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan 

Shazia Erum and Aish Muhammad  

Plant Genetic Resource Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan 

Faisal Nouroz
 
 

Department of Botany, Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan and Molecular Genetics 

Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Leicester, UK 

Saima Kanwal  

Food Science and Product Development Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, 

Islamabad, Pakistan  

 

Article History: 
 

Received: 15-Nov-2016 

Revised received: 11-Dec-

2016 

Accepted: 20-Dec-2016  

Online available: 5-Jan-

2017 

 

Keywords: 
Solanum tuberosum,  

CIP germplasm, 

in vivo propagation 

Abstract 

In order to evaluate the morphological and qualitative 

characteristics of potato tubers total 35 genotypes were 

selected for propagation and trait screening. Consequential 

differences and diverse characteristics were found in all the 

genotypes after cultivation, wherein, among all the traits zina 

red, CIP 07, CIP 12, CIP 22, gave the highest results regarding 

yield and quality of potato tubers except CIP 03 which has low 

germination percentage and significant quality characters. The 

dendrogram was prepared to show the massive variation 

between potato genotypes. This screening is supportive to the 

permanent efforts to select the best genotype for the 

developing processing industry of Pakistan. 

 

1. INTRODUCTION 
 

Solanum tuberosum L. (Potato) from genus solanum belongs to the family Solanaceae, is an 

annual crop (Khurana et al., 2003). 2n=48 is the number of chromosome of potato. An auto-

tetrapoloid potato is stuffy, perennials and heterozygous plant species (Roodbar et al., 2008). 

Potato is originated from Peru in North America and feast to other parts of the world where in it is 

spread efficaciously plusdevelop essential crop of Europe (Bashir, 1981). Depending on cultivar 

during storage of potatoes start gathering reducing sugars, by which transport sweet flavour in 

their end vintages because of the objectionable brown shade of chips and fries as well as creating 

them unfit for chip treating (Schimmer, 1957). 

 

 
Corresponding author’s  

Name: Saima Kanwal 

Email address: saima.kanwal80@gmail.com 

  

Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 
 

 
 

 

http://aessweb.com/journal-detail.php?id=5005 
DOI: 10.18488/journal.1005/2016.6.11/1005.11.210.220 

 



Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(11)2016: 210-220 

 

211 

 

Potatoes which have rich reducing sugars concentrations are responsible for the browning of 

potato chips during frying and therefore lower applications of reducing sugars result in high 

quality product (Mazza, 1983). Potatoes are disbursed every wherein the biosphere with enormous 

amounts in which potatoes could be a right pedestrian vehicle for hectoring some fitness 

connected complications (Ezekiel et al., 2013). Because of their favourable effects on health, 

frequent of the compounds existing in potatoes are essential therefore they are highly required in 

the human diet (Katan & de Roos, 2004). During the year 2010 to 2011 the total cultivation of 

potatoes  in all over Pakistan were recorded as 3491700 tones with total 159400 hectares, while in 

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa the total production area was 8900 hectares, in Punjab 148100 hectares, in 

Baluchistan 2000 hectares  were recorded (Anonymous, 2005). In all over the world 315 million 

tons of potatoes were produced where in Pakistan total production was 3.49 million tons of 

potatoes with 14 kg/capita/year, while according to the year 2008 potatoes production was 2.5 

million metric tons (FAO, 2008). Most vegetative crop for Pakistan is considered is potato in 

Pakistan which grown 101.5 thousand hectares on an area with a yearly invention of 666.1 

thousand loads (Anonymous, 2005). Andigena is widely grown by native farmers since Mexico, 

from south America the North and Central American cultivars were most familiarized but from 

Colombia to Argentina the cultivars are likely active (Hawkes, 1990). In Europe Plant protection 

policies has been closely linked to potatoes (Ebbels, 2003). Due to the economic position of the 

crop and the wide range of pests that affect them, Phytophthora infestans causes Irish potato 

dearth in the 19th century, an effective example set for the distressing effects and far 

accomplishment implications a plant disorder (Bourke, 1964).The objective of the present study 

was to evaluate and study the effect of seed size (small, medium and large) on potato manufacture 

under field conditions plus also to select potato diverse genotypes for yield traits and processing 

aspects, for growers, food industrialists and the potato product consumers in Pakistan.  

 

2. MATERIALS AND METHOD 
 

Potato genotypes including exotic and local varieties obtained from different sources as collected 

from potato program were planted at National Agriculture Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan, 

during the month of October, 2014 for their evaluation and screening. The potato planting was 

done according to Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The fertilizer was 

applied @ 250-125-125 NPK (Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium) kg per hectare at seed bed 

preparation. The other dose of N (250 kg/ha) was divided in to two equal parts, applied at first and 

second earthening up. Eight varieties per bed were sown in RCBD (R1 small tuber, R2 medium 

tuber, R3 large tuber) Propagating was done by guardianship tuber to tuber space 20 cm and line 

to line space 75 cm. Plant protection measures were applied as when they are compulsory. 

Depended on environmental conditions irrigation practices were done i.e. four to five times in a 

month. For all treatments uniform cultural practices were adopted. At crop maturity, devaluing 
1
was done and tubers were harvested after 15 days of devaluing allowing tuber skin to firm up. In 

a specific temperature for additional cultivation these tubers were stored. 

 

                                                           
1 Note: NPK stands for Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium 



Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(11)2016: 210-220 

 

212 

 

Figure 1: (a) Soil bed preparation, (b) Size of tubers, (c) Tuber measuring tool 

 

2.1. Collection of data/Yield parameters 

The field measurement data of selected potato germplasm were recorded on the basis of 

phenotypic parameters germination percentage and height of plant (cm), No. of eyes per tuber, 

tuber shape, tuber skin type, No. tubers per plant, average tuber weight per plant, average tuber 

size per plant). Small size range was 10 to 20mm, medium size was 20 to 30mm and large size 

was 30 to 40mm (Table 1). 

 

Table 1: Total computable parameters used 

NO Total Parameters Methodology 

1 Plant height/plant 

By using meter rod plant height was measured from the 

bottom to the top maximum level of the plant in 

centimeter (Fig. 2.1). 

2 
Germination 

percentage (%)/plant 

By subtracting the total number of tubers sown from the 

total number of tubers germinated multiplied by hundred 

Germination percentage was calculated and the values 

were expressed in percentage(%). 

Germination % age = No. of tubers sown    × 100 

No. of tubers germinated 

3 Total tubers/plant 
After harvesting the crop plant character was detected by 

calculating total number of tubers per plant manually. 

4 
Average tuber 

size/plant 

With the helping of potato measuring tool plant size 

character was measured. 

5 
Average tuber 

weight/plant (gm) 

By using electronic balance total number of tuber weight 

per plant was measured in weight measuring unit gram. 

6 Quantity of eyes/tuber 
By visual inspection after harvesting entire number of eyes 

per tuber were noted. 

7 Tubers shape/plant Tubers shapes were noted after harvest. 

8 
Skin type of 

Tubers/plant 

By optical observation the tuber skin type were examined 

after harvesting. 

 

2.2. Statistical analysis  

To examine the in vivo data Statistix 8.1 software were used and for the construction of graph 

Microsoft excel were used. ANOVA (Analysis of variance) was applied for the comparison 

among diverse potato specie while for the grouping of recorded qualitative data UPGMA cluster 

was used. 

 

 

c b a 



Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(11)2016: 210-220 

 

213 

 

3. RESULTS 
 

After the cultivation of potato CIP germplasm the data were recorded according to the following 

parameters 

 

3.1. Plant height and germination percentage 

Variation record in plant height is from 37.200
a
 to 1.300

h
. Among all the CIP germplasm Zina red 

gave the maximum height (37.200
a
) followed by Desiree (33.000

ab
) while, Minutes plant height 

was detected in CIP 03 cultivar (1.300
h
). 5% level of LSD at results about germination percentage 

were significant. Supreme sprouting percentage was obtained in CIP germplasms (06, 08, 10, 11, 

12, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 30, 32, 33), desire, HZD2 1499 and Zina red (100.00
a
) monitored by CIP 

02, CIP 05, CIP 19, CIP 28, CIP 29, CIP 31 and Astrix (93.33
ab

) while Lowest germination 

percentage was noted in CIP 03 (20.00
d
) (Figure 2, 3 and Table 2). 

 

 
Figure 2: Plant height 

 

 
Figure 3: Germination percentage 

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45
 PLANT HEIGHT (cm) 

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

GERMINATION PERCENTAGE 



Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(11)2016: 210-220 

 

214 

 

3.2. Number of tubers per plant and Number of eyes per tuber 
CIP 07 (10.133

a
) and CIP 12 (9.267

ab
) showed supreme tubers per plant while, CIP 03 (1.000

k
) 

showed lowest number of tubers per plant. By visual inspection CIP 01, 02, 04, 07, 09, 10, 12, 14, 

16, 17, 20, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29 30, 31, 32, 33, Asterix, Desiree, Zina red, HZD2 1499 presented 

intermediate eyes per tuber although CIP 03, 05, 06, 08, 11, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 34 exhibited few 

eyes per tuber (Figure 4, 5 (a-i) and Table. 2). 

 

 
Figure 4: Number of tubers 

 

3.3. Shape of the tuber and tuber skin type 

For tuber shapes the composed gathered tubers were observed giving to the following Key. 

Ovate: CIP05, CIP28, CIP31. 

Oblong: CIP01, CIP03, CIP06, CIP07, CIP08, CIP09, CIP11, CIP15, CIP20, CIP25, CIP27, 

CIP29, CIP33, Asterix, Desiree, Zina red, HZD2 1499. 

Round: CIP02, CIP04, CIP10, CIP13, CIP16, CIP18, CIP19, CIP24, CIP30, CIP32, CIP34. 

Long oblong: CIP12, CIP14. 

Obovate: CIP17, CIP22. 

According to the following key the tubers skin type were noted 

Rough: CIP07, CIP16, CIP017, CIP19, CIP28, CIP30, CIP34. 

Smooth: CIP02, CIP03, CIP04, CIP05, CIP06, CIP08, CIP09, CIP11, CIP12, CIP13, CIP14, 

CIP15, CIP18, CIP20, CIP22, CIP24, CIP27, CIP29, CIP31, CIP32, CIP33, Asterix, Desiree, Zina 

red, HZD2 1499. 

Partially netted: CIP01, CIP25. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

NUMBER OF TUBERS /PLANT 



Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(11)2016: 210-220 

 

215 

 

a 

l k j i 

h g f e 

d c b 

 Figure 5 a-i: Tuber skin type and shape of different CIP and local germplasms  

 

 

C
IP

 2
2

C
IP

 3
4

C
IP

 1
9

C
IP

 1
8

C
IP

 1
3

C
IP

 0
5

C
IP

 1
5

C
IP

 1
1

C
IP

 0
8

C
IP

 0
6

C
IP

 0
3

C
IP

 1
7

H
ZD

2 
14

99

Z
in
a 
Re

d

D
ES

IR
RE

A
ST

RI
X

C
IP

 3
3

C
IP

 2
9

C
IP

 2
7

C
IP

 2
0

C
IP

 0
9

C
IP

 3
1

C
IP

 2
8

C
IP

 3
0

C
IP

 1
6

C
IP

 1
4

C
IP

 1
2

C
IP

 0
7

C
IP

 3
2

C
IP

 2
4

C
IP

10

C
IP

 0
4

C
IP

 0
2

C
IP

 2
5

C
IP

 0
1

33.33

55.56

77.78

100.00

Observations

S
im
ila
ri
ty

Dendrogram
Single Linkage, Euclidean Distance

Figure 6: On the basis of qualitative characterization UPGMA cluster observed in 35 

genotypes of potato 
 



Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(11)2016: 210-220 

 

216 

 

Analysis was measured by the UPGMA (Un weighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic 

average) between CIP and local Potato cultivars for the qualitative correlation principal and 

cluster component. By UPGMA cluster analysis 35 diverse genotypes of potato paired into two 

main clusters, having extra sub-clusters, clusters I and II, (Fig. 3.5). Within I group showed that, 

genotypes were closely accompanying with each other, though slightly diverse inside the II group. 

In sub groups these subgroups further divided comprehended of genotypes. The ecotypes 

presented by dendrogram that were products of inherently analogous form, assembled unruffled. 

In the existent study, the cluster (band) analysis the altered genotypes were interposed with each 

other, which established no association between the qualitative development arrangements and 

their geographical source beneath examination. 

 

4. DISCUSSION 
 

Maximum plant height among all the genotypes were obtained in Zina Red (37.200
a
) and lesser 

height was produced by CIP 03 (1.300
h
). This modification in plant height (cm) may be due to the 

genetic transformation of verities. Our upshots are also in mark with Luthra et al. (2005) who also 

give description difference in between the unlike genotypes allocated to enough growth. Similar 

results in potato were also testified by other personnel (Schittenhelm et al., 2006; Shaterian et al., 

2008). Present studies showing maximum number of germination percentage contained (100.00
a
) 

at CIP germplasms (06, 08, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, 30, 32, 33), desiree, HZD2 1499 and 

Zina red in that order followed by CIP germplasms (02, 05, 19, 28, 29, 31) and Astrix (93.33
ab

) 

however this difference among the genotypes might be due to genetically disparity and ecological 

conditions. Due to (Patel et al., 2008) large size tubers of high quantity might be due to inattentive 

plant beginning and with plant progression. Analogous effects were renowned by Khan et al. 

(2013) who described 80% to 95% disproportion in development percentage between tested 

cultivars. 

 

Present studies showed the maximum number of tubers per plant in CIP 07, followed by CIP 12 

(9.267
ab

) (10.133
a
). Variation between tubers per plant might be due to genetic growth in all the 

genotypes. Imperative protagonist in stolen and tuberilisation processes showed genetic makeup 

and environmental factor (Subarta & Upadhya, 1997). The results are within agreement with the 

conclusion of Singh and Ahmad (2008) who described variance due to vegetation and tuber 

origination. According to our fallouts average tubers weight per plant was in Zina Red (338.029
a
), 

surveyed by HZD2 1499 (280.68
ab

) while these alteration may be due to the aspects of genotypes, 

suitable progress plus disorder although these outcomes are adjusted to the deduction of Tuku 

(2000). The average tuber size per plant showing the existent work of the altered potato varieties 

were significant (5%) in which resolute number of minor size tubers were obtained in CIP 

10(9.0000
a
) tracked by CIP 12, CIP 13 and CIP 30 (8.3333

ab
). Genotypes with medium size of 

tubers were observed in CIP 22 (3.0000
e
) followed by CIP 28 (4.6667

abcd
) although Medium 

tubers were found in CIP 03 (0.0000
h
)while, great number of large size tubers were found in Zina 

red (4.3333
a
) followed by HZD2 1499 (3.6667

ab
)besides minimum number of huge size tubers 

were establish in CIP 03 (0.0000
d
). Present work was buttressed by Masarirambi et al. (2012) 

which showed that by seed size the last size and number of tubers formed per plant was managed. 

Recent results about the qualitative characteristics showed that numbers of eyes per tuber in all 

the genotypes were intermediate in nature which were found in CIP 01, 02, 04, 07, 09, 10, 12, 14, 

16, 17, 20, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29 30, 31, 32, 33, Asterix, Desiree, Zina red, HZD2 1499 and some of 

them like CIP 03, 05, 06, 08, 11, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 34 showed unsatisfactory eyes per tuber 

while, tubers shape also exhibited variation among all the potato germplasm tubers where in 

CIP05, CIP28, CIP31 presented ovate shape, CIP01, CIP03, CIP06, CIP07, CIP08, CIP09, CIP11, 

CIP15, CIP20, CIP25, CIP27, CIP29, CIP33, Asterix, Desiree, Zina red, HZD2 1499 indicated 

oblong shape, CIP02, CIP04, CIP10, CIP13, CIP16, CIP18, CIP19, CIP24, CIP30, CIP32, CIP34 

revealed round shape, CIP12, CIP14 showed long oblong and CIP17, CIP22 showed obovate 

shape. Tuber skin types were noted in which rough types were CIP07, CIP16, CIP017, CIP19, 



Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(11)2016: 210-220 

 

217 

 

CIP28, CIP30, CIP34, however smooth types were designated by  CIP02, CIP03, CIP04, CIP05, 

CIP06, CIP08, CIP09, CIP11, CIP12, CIP13, CIP14, CIP15, CIP18, CIP20, CIP22, CIP24, 

CIP27, CIP29, CIP31, CIP32, CIP33, Asterix, Desiree, Zina red, HZD2 1499 and partially netted 

were exhibited by CIP01, CIP25. Our results about qualitative characteristics was within contract 

with Khan et al. (2014) as they determined that all the characteristics of potatoes in which tuber 

shape, skin colour, flesh colour, eye depth and their  general presence are the distinguishing 

qualities of potato for money making interest about performs and  innumerable handling whereas, 

in former observations of Ganga et al. (2013). With a little bit similarity with our work most of 

their potato verities contours were unalike from our existing results and numbers of eyes were 

littler in utmost of the cultivars which showed  

 

5. CONCLUSION 
 

Existent studies concluded that such type of trainings is necessary to enhance yield of potato. 

Field experiment or in vivo propagation should be shepherded to cultivate parsimoniously or 

economically attainable diseases-free planting quantifiable. In the altered areas of Pakistan 

researchers need to improve these genotypes to check their production for future research study 

 
Funding: This study received no specific financial support.  

Competing Interests: The author declares that s/he has no conflict of interests.  

Contributors/Acknowledgement: All authors participated equally in designing and estimation of current 

research. 

Views and opinions expressed in this study are the views and opinions of the authors, Asian Journal of 

Agriculture and Rural Development shall not be responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability 

etc. caused in relation to/arising out of the use of the content. 
 

References 
 

Anonymous (2005). Agricultural statistics of Pakistan. Govt. of Pakistan. Ministry of Food, 

Agriculture, and Livestock. Food, Agriculture & Livestock Division (Economic Wing), 

Islamabad. 

Bashir, A. (1981). Screening of exotic germplasm for yield and growth in potato. MSC Thesis 

Department of Horticulture, University of Agriculture Faisalabad. 

Bourke, P. M. (1964). Emergence of potato blight. Nature, 203, 805-808. 

Ebbels, D. L. (2003). Principles of plant health and quarantine. Wallingford, UK: CABI 

Publishing. 

Ezekiel, R., Singh, N., Sharma, S., & Kaur, A. 2013. Beneficial phytochemicals in potato – A 

review. Food Research International, 50, 487–496.  

FAO (2008). Home page on internet. Available on the: http://www.FAO.org. 

http://www.potato2008.org/en/potato/cultivation.html.  

Ganga, H., Uma, N., Kulkarni, N., Yenegi, B., Basavaraj, N., Uppinal, N., & Ramachandra, K. N. 

(2013). Study on physical characteristics of potato genotypes. J. Agric. Sci., 26, 281-284. 

Katan, M. B., De Roos, N. M. (2004). Promises and problems of functional foods. Crit. Rev. 

Food. Sci. Nutr., 44, 369–377.  

Khan, M. A., Hafiz, I., Farooq. A., Abbasi, K. N. A., & Razzaq, A. (2014). Evaluation of potato 

hybrids for yield components in humid subtropical climate during autumn season. JAPS. 

24, 1511-1517. 

Khan, M. F., Najma, T., Anila, L., Abdul, K., & Mansoor, M. (2013). Morphological 

characterization of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) germplasm under rainfed environment. 

J. Nairobi, Kenya, Afri. J. Bio., 22, 3214-3223. 

Khurana, S. M. P., Minhas, J. S., & Pandey, S. K. (2003). The Potato: production and utilization 

in sub-tropics. Mehta Publishers, New Delhi, India. 445. 

http://www.fao.org/
http://www.potato2008.org/en/potato/cultivation.html


Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(11)2016: 210-220 

 

218 

 

Luthra, S. K., Gopal, J., Pandy, S. K., & Singh, B. P. (2005). Genetic parameters and characters 

associated in tubersoum potatoes. Potato J., 32(3-4), 234. 

Masarirambi, M. T., Mandisodza, F. C., Mashingaidze, A. B., & Bhebhe, E. (2012). Influence of 

plant population and seed tuber size on growth and yield components of potato (Solanum 

tuberosum). Int. J. Agric. Biol., 14, 545–549. 

Mazza, G. (1983). Correlations between quality parameters of potatoes during growth and long-

term storage. Am. Potato J., 60, 145-159. 

Patel, C. K., Patel, P. T., & Chaudhari, S. M. (2008). Effect of physiological age and seed size on 

seed production of potato in North Gujarat. India. Potato J., 36 (2-3), 18-23. 

Roodbar, S. T., Sepahvand, N. A., Omidi, M., Samsun, T., Mohammadi, A., & Abdi, H. R. 

(2008). Response of four commercial potato cultivars to different combination of plant 

growth regulators in meristem culture and production of virus free plantlets. Iranian J. 

Crop Sci., 9(4), 332-344. 

Schimmer, S., Hendel, C. E., Harrington, W. O., & Olson, R. L. (1957). Interrelationship among 

measurements of browning of processed potatoes and sugar components. Am. Potato J. 

34, 119-132. 

Schittenhelm, S., Sourell, H., & Lopmeier, F. J. (2006). Drought resistance of potat cultivars with 

contrasting canopy architecture. Europ. J. Agronomy, 24, 193-202. 

Shaterian, J., Waterer, D. R., de Jong H., & Tanino. K. K. (2008). Methodologies and traits for 

evaluating the salt tolerance in diploid potato clones. Am. J. Pot. Res. 85, 93-100. 

Singh, N., & Ahmad, Z.  (2008). Effect of mulching on potato production in high altitude cold 

arid zone of ladakh. Potato J., 35 (3-4), 118-121. 

Subarta, M., & Upadhya, M. O. (1997). Potato production in Western Bengal. Enviromental 

Ecology, 4(15), 646-649. 

Tuku, B. T. (2000). The utilization of true potato seed (TPS) as an alternative method of potato 

production. Indonesian J. Agric. Sci. 1(2), 29-38. 

 



Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(11)2016: 210-220 

 

219 

 

APPENDICES 

 

Table 2: LSD All-pairwise comparisons test for all morphological traits 

Genotypes  
Plant height 

(cm) 
Germination% 

Average weight 

of tubers 

Number of 

tuber/plant 

Average tuber 

small size/plant 

Average tuber 

medium size/plant 

Average tuber 

large size/plant 

CIP-01 7.200
fgh

 66.67
bc

 55.74
jk
 4.800

ghij
 4.6667

cde
 1.6667

fgh
 2.3333

bc
 

CIP-02 10.300
def

 93.33
ab

 102.40
hijk

 7.133
abcdefghi

 8.0000 
ab

 2.3333
defgh

 1.6667
cd

 

CIP-03 1.300
h
 20.00

d
 3.24

k
 1.000k 3.0000

e
 0.0000

h
 0.0000

d
 

CIP-04 3.067
gh

 66.67
bc

 153.25
cdefghij

 5.667
defghij

 3.0000e 3.3333
cdefg

 2.6667
abc

 

CIP-05 6.767f
gh

 93.33a
b
 88.58

ijk
 5.267

efghij
 7.3333

abc
 1.0000

gh
 1.3333

cd
 

CIP-06 10.567
def

 100.00
a
 200.99

bcdefg
 8.700

abcd
 8.0000

ab
 3.6667

bcdef
 1.3333c

d
 

CIP-07 12.933
cdef

 86.00
abc

 168.68
cdefghi

 10.133
a
 6.0000

abcde
 2.0000

efgh
 1.3333

cd
 

CIP-08 12.733
cdef

 100.00
a
 131.34

defghij
 7.267

abcdefgh
 8.0000

ab
 2.3333

defgh
 1.3333

cd
 

CIP-09 9.433
efg

 73.33
abc

 101.39
hijk

 8.133
abcde

 7.3333
abc

 3.0000
defg

 1.3333
cd

 

CIP-10 17.800
c
 100.00

a
 245.85

abc
 9.133

ab
 9.0000

a
 4.0000

abcdef
 1.3333

cd
 

CIP-11 10.200
def

 100.00
a
 103.07

hijk
 5.000

fghij
 6.3333

abcd
 3.0000

defg
 1.3333

cd
 

CIP-12 17.033
cd

 100.00
a
 232.92

abcd
 9.267

ab
 8.3333

ab
 4.3333

abcde
 2.0000

bc
 

CIP-13 11.867
cdef

 100.00
a
 215.00

bcde
fg 9.000

abc
 8.3333

ab
 4.0000

abcdef
 2.0000

bc
 

CIP-14 9.767
efg

 80.00
abc

 110.53
ghijk

 3.967
jk
 5.3333

bcde
 1.6667

fgh
 2.6667

abc
 

CIP-15 10.533
def

 73.33
abc

 142.63
cdefghij

 6.667
bcdefghij

 6.6667
abcd

 1.0000
gh

 1.3333
cd

 

CIP-16 13.533
cdef

 100.00
a
 155.40

cdefghij
 7.067

abcdefghi
 7.0000

abcd
 2.3333

defgh
 1.3333

cd
 

CIP-17 11.033
cdef

 100.00
a
 94.62

hijk
 5.333

efghij
 7.0000

abcd
 2.6667

defg
 2.0000

bc
 

CIP-18 11.067
cdef

 60.00
c
 122.66

efghij
 5.067

efghij
 5.3333

bcde
 3.3333c

defg
 1.3333c

d
 

CIP-19 13.400
cdef

 93.33
ab

 154.84
cdefghij

 4.133
ij
 4.0000

de
 3.0000

defg
 1.6667

cd
 

CIP-20 14.933
cde

 100.00
a
 224.18

bcde
 6.333

bcdefghij
 5.3333

bcde
 4.3333

abcde
 2.3333

bc
 

CIP-22 14.933
cde

 100.00
a
 241.30

abc
 6.733

bcdefghij
 7.0000

abcd
 6.3333

a
 2.0000

bc
 

CIP-24 11.533
cdef

 66.67
bc

 104.76
hijk

 4.500
hij

 5.6667
bcde

 2.6667
defg

 2.0000
bc

 

CIP-25 13.833
cdef

 86.67
abc

 199.26
bcdefgh

 5.067
efghij

 4.0000
de

 3.6667
bcdef

 2.0000
bc

 

CIP-27 13.700
cdef

 66.67
bc

 132.00
dcefghij

 5.933
cdefghij

 4.6667
cde

 2.6667
defg

 1.3333
cd

 

CIP-28 12.267
cdef

 93.33
ab

 175.64
bcdefgh

i 8.067
abcdef

 8.0000
ab

 4.6667
abcd

 2.6667
abc

 

CIP-29 15.267
cde

 93.33
ab

 91.19
ijk

 4.100
ij
 5.6667

bcde
 3.0000

defg
 2.0000

bc
 

CIP-30 16.033
sde

 100.00
a
 220.56

bcdef
 7.867

abcdefg
 8.3333

ab
 4.0000

abcdef
 1.6667

cd
 

CIP-31 14.867
cde

 93.33
ab

 122.76
efghij

 5.233
efghij

 4.6667
cde

 3.3333
cdefg

 2.3333
bc

 



Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(11)2016: 210-220 

 

220 

 

CIP-32 16.400
cde

 100.00
a
 233.55

abcd
 6.533

bcdefghij
 6.0000

abcde
 3.6667

bcdef
 3.0000

abc
 

CIP-33 9.800
efg

 100.00
a
 115.90

fghij
 5.433

efghij
 5.666

7bcde
 2.6667

defg
 2.0000

bc
 

CIP-34 16.067
cde

 86.67
abc

 141.70
cdefghij

 5.033
fghij

 4.0000
de

 3.6667
bcdef

 1.3333
cd

 

Asetrix 28.033
b
 93.33

ab
 237.97

abcd
 6.600

bcdefghij
 5.3333

bcde
 4.0000

abcdef
 2.0000

bc
 

Desirre 33.000
ab

 100.00
a
 233.11

abcd
 5.667

defghij
 7.0000

abcd
 4.6667

abcd
 2.6667

abc
 

HZD2 1499 25.933
b
 100.00

a
 280.68

ab
 6.533

bcdefghij
 5.3333

bcde
 5.6667

abc
 3.6667

ab
 

Zina red 37.200
a
 100.00

a
 338.02

a
 6.267

bcdefghij
 4.3333

cde
 6.0000

ab
 4.3333

a
 

LSD(0.05) 7.1194 33.304 107.97 3.0812 3.0417 2.5789 1.7112