EFFECT OF SELECTED INSECTICIDE ON WHITEFLY (Bemisia tabaci) INFESTING BRINJAL PLANTS 212 Impact of Gomal Zam Dam irrigation project on agriculture and welfare of farming community in southern districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa-Pakistan Saad Ali Khana, Syed Attaullah Shaha*, Irfan Ullaha, Muhammad Ibrahimb, Salman Khana a Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan b University of Agriculture AMK Campus Mardan, Pakistan * Email address: syedshah313@gmail.com (Corresponding Author) ARTICLE HISTORY: Received: 21-Apr-2018 Accepted: 25-May-2018 Online available: 18-Jun- 2018 Keywords: Gomal Zam Dam (GZD), Canal water irrigation, Spate irrigation, Southern districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan ABSTRACT This study investigated impact of Gomal Zam Dam (GZD) irrigation project on agriculture and welfare of farm households in Southern districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The study found immense effect of the project on increase in cultivated area and yield of wheat and gram crops, and diversification of traditional cropping pattern to commercialized farming with the addition of sugarcane and vegetables. The availability of irrigation water also induced cultivation of fodder crops which enabled farmers to add large ruminants to their livestock herds. All these changes resulted improvement in farmers’ welfare and development in project area. There are various post project needs which are equally important for long term success. The most important of these needs are training of farmers on water use efficiency; provision of technical assistance on using high yielding seed varieties, chemical fertilizers and pesticides; and provision of credit and subsidies for dairy farming. Contribution/ Originality This research study was designed to evaluate the impact of Gomal Zam Dam (GZD) Irrigation project on farm level agriculture in D. I. Khan and Tank districts in Southern KP province. Findings from this study support government investment in hydropower and irrigation infrastructure development in the Southern districts of KP province. Such investment will be more effective in improving farming community’s welfare and growth in the agricultural sector of the province. DOI: 10.18488/journal.1005/2017.7.10/1005.10.212.218 ISSN (P): 2304-1455/ISSN (E):2224-4433 Citation: Saad Ali Khan, Syed Attaullah Shah, Irfan Ullah, Muhammad Ibrahim and Salman Khan (2017). Impact of Gomal Zam Dam irrigation project on agriculture and welfare of farming community in southern districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa-Pakistan. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 7(10), 212-218. © 2017 Asian Economic and Social Society. All rights reserved. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Volume 7, Issue 10(2017): 212-218 http://aessweb.com/journal-detail.php?id=5005 mailto:syedshah313@gmail.com http://aessweb.com/journal-detail.php?id=5005 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.18488/journal.1005/2017.7.10/1005.10.212.218 Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 7(10)2017: 212-218 213 1. INTRODUCTION Agriculture, which is the back bone of the Pakistan’s economy, has a declining share in the Gross Domestic Production for the past years. This decline in agricultural share is a result of growth in the industrial and services sectors of the economy. However, agricultural production for major crops are showing upward trends. Increase in production of major crops, such as Rice, Cotton, Wheat and Sugarcane, are key for growth in agro-based industries. Also, agriculture is a main source of employment, and it feeds the whole rural and urban population of the country (GoP, 2017). That’s why government policy makers are always committed to work for growth in this sector and to solve its major problems. Increase in production of major crops can be achieved through intensive and extensive practices. Intensive agriculture is the use of high yielding seed varieties and recommended fertilizers doses of fertilizers and chemicals for increasing crops yield. Extensive agriculture means expansion in cultivated area under major crops, and this can be achieved through provision of irrigation facility in rain-fed areas. Construction of small, medium and large dams and water canals for irrigation can help in utilizing uncultivated land for crops production (Khan and Shah, 2012; Khan et al., 2011; Majeed et al., 2010; Sarwar and Bastiaanssen, 2001). The Southern districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have potential for extensive crops production; however, due to unavailability of irrigation water, agricultural productivity is low and most of the area is barren. After the construction of Chashma Right Bank Canal, water requirement has been fulfilled on substantial agricultural land of D. I. Khan. The availability of water has resulted diversification in cropping pattern and increase in yield of major crops. The government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is now executing another water resources development project- the Gomal Zam Dam (GZD) project. The gross command area of the project is 271,038 acres comprising of 192166.46 acres in Tank, 110,957 acres in Kulachi and 27,929 acres in D. I. Khan. Figure 1: Ariel view of Gomal Zam dam The GZD command area is well known for spate irrigation, locally named as Rod Kohi, and is practiced for centuries in this area (Asif et al., 2016; Nawaz and Han, 2006). During monsoon period, water is stored and is used for irrigating crops in winter season (Ahmad and Choudhry, 2005). The climate of the project area is hot in summer and moderately cold in winter, and mean annual Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 7(10)2017: 212-218 214 precipitation is around 250-270 mm. Current cropping pattern include Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Gram (Ciccer aeritinum) as major crops. Huge potential exists for production of cereals and cash crops if provided with irrigation water. This study investigated the impact of the GZD irrigation system on agricultural productivity, area allocation to major crops, dairy farming and farmers’ welfare. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1. Sampling and data collection A two stage stratified sampling technique was used to select a sample of beneficiaries and non- beneficiaries from the study area. In the first stage, four villages were purposively selected from GZD command area-two located in D.I. Khan District (beneficiaries) and two in Tank district (non- beneficiaries). In the second stage, 25 farmers were selected randomly from each village. Thus a sample of 100 farmers was selected having equal number of beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of GZD irrigation project. Data were collected from the selected farm households and for this purpose a well-designed and pre- tested questionnaire was used. Other required information were collected from different secondary sources, such as published reports of different government departments. 2.2. Analytical framework To evaluate the impact of GZD irrigation project on on-farm area allocation to major crops (wheat and gram) and their yields per acre, independent sample t-tests were conducted. 𝑡 = (�̅�1 − �̅�2) √ 𝑆1 2 𝑛1 + 𝑆2 2 𝑛2 … … … … … … … . . (1) Where; (1, 2) represent beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of GZD irrigation project t is the ‘t-statistic’ 𝑛1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛2 are the number of beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries, respectively; �̅�1𝑎𝑛𝑑 �̅�2 are the corresponding mean value for their respective cultivated area or yield 𝑆1 2 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑆2 2 are the respective unbiased estimator of the variances for beneficiaries and non- beneficiaries. The associations of cultivation of cash crops, such as sugarcane and vegetables, and rearing of cows and buffaloes with availability for irrigation water from GZD project were checked through Pearson χ2 test. 𝑥2 = ∑ (𝑂𝑖− 𝐸𝑖)2 𝐸𝑖 … … … … … … … . . (2) Where: χ2 represents Chi-Square Distribution O is the observed value E represents expected value Household’s aggregate monthly expenditure (food and non-food) was used as a welfare indicator in the following dummy variable regression model to estimate the effect of GZD-irrigation project on their wellbeing. 𝐶𝐸 𝑗 = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1𝐷𝑗 … … … … … … … . . (3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unbiased_estimator https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 7(10)2017: 212-218 215 Where: CEj is total monthly expenditure of the jth farm household. D is a dummy variable, 1 if jth farm household is beneficiary of GZD-irrigation project, otherwise 0. β0 is the intercept or the jth farm household’s average monthly expenditure. β1 is coefficient of dummy variable D, representing change in farm household’s monthly expenditure because of GZD irrigation project. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION This section is divided into two parts. The first part present characteristics of the interviewed farm households and the second part report results on the impacts of the GZD irrigation project on area allocation to major crops, yields, cropping pattern, dairy farming and monthly expenditure of the farm households in the command area. 3.1. Characteristics of the farm households The GZD command area comprises an approximate population of about 355,000 (252,000 in D.I.Khan and 103,000 in Tank). The clans residing in the area are Unnara, Kannera, Baloch, Gandapure, Manjhikhel, Khokhar and Masud. The languages spoken widely are Saraiki and Pashto. Data collected from interviewed farm households show that male and female proportion in the command area was 51% and 49%, respectively; average household size was 11 individuals; and most of them were headed by male member. Literacy rate was low because of non-functional schools and unqualified staff. Around 75% of the community members were illiterate and were unable to read and write, while only 25% were literate. Female members were more illiterate (83.5%) as compared to male members (68% illiterate), this was due to the unavailability of middle and higher schools for female in the area. Agriculture was the main source of their income, and their average farm size was 50 acres. Around 50% of the interviewed farm households were owner of their farm land, 40% were tenant and 10% were owner-cum-tenants. 3.2. Impacts of GZD irrigation project on 3.2.1 Cultivated land The availability of perennial source of water for irrigation has increased the area under crops and is a game changer for the people using traditional flood management system for the production of crops. Descriptive statistics for farm size and on-farm cultivated land are given in Table 1. Average farm size of the non-beneficiaries was 60.7 acres and average cultivated land was 19.0 acres. The cultivated land was around 30.9% of their total farm size. The beneficiaries’ farm size was 40.1 acres, out of which cultivated land was 28.1acres (66.7%). It clearly shows that beneficiary farmers were practicing extensive agriculture on their farm. GZD irrigation project helped them in utilizing barren land for cultivation of crops. Table 1: Average farm size and cultivated land Farmers Average Farm Size (Acres) Cultivated Land (Acres) Non-Beneficiary 60.7 19.0 (30.9%) Beneficiary 40.1 28.1 (66.7%) Total 50.4 24.1 (48.3%) Source: Survey data (2016) Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 7(10)2017: 212-218 216 3.2.2. Major crops cultivation Wheat is the staple food cultivated for the last 5 decades in the area through traditional Rod Kohi farming practice and its by-products is utilized as fodder for livestock. Wheat cultivated area were 10.5 acres and 16.8 acres on non-beneficiary and beneficiary farms, respectively (Table 2). This high cultivated area for wheat crop on a beneficiary’s farm was apparently because of the water availability from GZD-irrigation system. Gram, the second most important food crop after wheat, was cultivated on 4.0 acres and 7.4 acres of a non-beneficiary and a beneficiary farm, respectively (Table 2). Again, this significant difference of 3.4 acres on a beneficiary farm was resulted because of the GZD-irrigation project. Table 2: Land allocation for major crops Crops Land Allocation T-test statistic (P- value) Non-Beneficiaries Beneficiaries Wheat 10.5 acres 16.8 acres 4.84 (<0.001) Gram 4.0 acres 7.4 acres 5.40 (<0.001) Source: Survey data (2016) 3.2.3. Major crops’ yields Before, GZD Project, the timely availability of water for irrigation was a major problem. Now, the availability of perennial flow of water for irrigation has enhanced the agricultural productivity for major crops. Table 3 shows that average yield of wheat on non-beneficiary and a beneficiary farms were 700 Kgs and 1230 Kgs per acre, respectively. This high yield on beneficiary farm was because of water availability from GZD - Irrigation project and this increase in yield (by 530Kgs) is statistically significant, as indicated by t-statistic value of 5.01 and associated P-value of <0.001. The same table shows that average yield of gram on a non-beneficiary and a beneficiary farms were on average 334 Kgs and 713 Kgs per acre. The estimated t-statistic value of 6.40 is statistically significant for increased yield on beneficiary farm due to water availability from GZD - Irrigation system. Table 3: Yields for major crops Crops Yield per Acre T-test statistic (P- value) Non-Beneficiaries Beneficiaries Wheat 700 Kgs 1230 Kgs 5.01 (<0.001) Gram 334 Kgs 713 Kgs 6.40 (<0.001) Source: Survey data (2016) 3.2.4. Cultivation of cash crops Farmers having irrigation facility are likely to diversify their cropping pattern. The beneficiaries of GZD-irrigation system have started cultivating cash crops (sugarcane and vegetables). The given table 4 presents that 56% of the beneficiaries had started cultivating sugarcane, while the non- beneficiaries were unable to cultivate it. Similarly 74% of the beneficiary farmers were cultivating vegetables, while only 28% of the non-beneficiary farmers were able to cultivate them. The estimated Pearson chi-square statistics and associated p-values reveal significant association of cultivation of sugarcane and vegetables with water availability from GZD–irrigation system. Increase in cultivation of sugarcane and vegetables could significantly increase farmers’ income from agriculture. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 7(10)2017: 212-218 217 Table 4: Sugarcane and vegetables cultivation in the GZD command area Farmers Sugarcane Vegetables No Yes No Yes Non-Beneficiaries 50 (100%) 0 (0%) 36 (72%) 14 (28%) Beneficiaries 22 (44%) 28 (56%) 13 (26%) 37 (74%) All 62 (62%) 28 (28%) 49 (41%) 51(51%) Pearson chi2 (P-value) 45.488 (0.000) 18.082 (0.000) Source: Survey data (2016) 3.2.5. Livestock farming Irrigation facility in different ways can have a positive effect on livestock farming. Irrigated farming increase potential for green fodders production and motivate farmers to increase the number of large ruminants, such as cows and buffaloes, in their livestock herd. Increase in the number of these animals increase milk production and enhances farm household’s income. Table 5 shows that 73% of the interviewed beneficiaries were rearing buffaloes and cows for milk production. On the non- beneficiaries side only 27% of the interviewed farmers were rearing cows and buffaloes for milk production. The estimated Pearson chi-square value reveals significant association between irrigation facility and rearing of milk producing animals. Table 5: Impact of GZD irrigation project on adoption of milking animals Pearson chi2 (1) = 10.482 Pr = 0.001 3.2.6. Household’s welfare The GZD-irrigation system, through ensuring timely availability of water for production of crops, has sustained agricultural returns and has improved farm household’s returns. Welfare economists use household’s expenditures on food and non-food items as an indicator of their welfare status. That is why this study used farm household’s expenditure as a proxy for measuring improvement in their welfare. The estimated results for the dummy variable regression reveals that farm household’s monthly expenditure was on average 25918 rupees, and the expenditure for a beneficiary farm household was greater than the non-beneficiary’s by 18706 rupees. As indicated by T-statistics value of 3.52 and P-value of 0.001, this increase in the expenditures is statistically significant. CE = α0 + α1(D) = 25918 + 18706(D) T-value (3.35) (3.52) P >│t│ (0.001) (0.001) 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The GZD-irrigation system has resulted increase in land allocation and yield for wheat and gram crops. The farm households have started growing high value crops, such as sugarcane and Farmer Cows and Buffaloes No Yes Non-Beneficiaries 36 (73%) 14 (27%) Beneficiaries 15 (28%) 35 (72%) Total 41 (100%) 59 (59%) Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 7(10)2017: 212-218 218 vegetables, and rearing of cows and buffaloes. This crops-livestock mixed agricultural strategy has increased and secured income. All these changes reveal that GZD–irrigation system has an immense effect on farm households’ welfare in the area. Findings of this study favor government investment in hydropower and irrigation infrastructure development in the Southern districts of KP. Such investment will be more effective in improving farming community’s welfare and growth in the agriculture sector of the province. There are various post project needs which are equally important for the success of the GZD- irrigation project and achieving its long term goals. The most important of these needs are training of farmers on modern agricultural farming for water use efficiency; provision of technical assistance on use of high yielding seed varieties, chemical fertilizers and pesticides; and provision of credit and subsidies for dairy farming. Funding: This study received no specific financial support. Competing Interests: The authors declared that they have no conflict of interests. Contributors/Acknowledgement: Among authors, Saad Ali Khan provided the main theme of the study from his MS thesis, Syed Attaullah Shah supervised and proof read whole the research, while rest of the authors completed the empirical portion of the study. Views and opinions expressed in this study are the views and opinions of the authors, Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development shall not be responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability etc. caused in relation to/arising out of the use of the content. References Ahmad, M., & Choudhry, M. R. (2005). Farmers’ irrigation practices under Rod Kohi irrigation system. Pakistan Journal of Water Resources, 9(1), 25-33. view at Google scholar Asif, M., Akbar, G., Ahmad, M. M., & Khattak, M. S. (2016). Impact of Rod Kohis improvement on water conveyance losses and wheat yield. Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences Volume, 49(1), 110-116. view at Google scholar GoP (2017). Pakistan economic survey. Pakistan Buru of Statistics, Islamabad. view at Google scholar Khan, H., & Shah, M. (2012). Irrigation, farm productivity and poverty reduction in kpk: understanding direct and indirect impacts and linkages. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2, 292-298. view at Google scholar / view at publisher Khan, M. T., Islam, M., Chattha, T. H., & Hayat, R. (2011). Impacts of mini dams on socioeconomic development of farmers of rainfed region. J. Agric. Soc. Sci, 7(4), 124-130. view at Google scholar Majeed, S., Ali, I., Zaman, S. M., & Ahmad, S. (2010). Productivity of mini dams in pothwar plateau: a diagnostic analysis. Research briefings. Natural Resource Division, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, 2(13), 1-19. view at Google scholar Nawaz, M., & Han, M. (2006). Hill torrents management for increasing agricultural activity in Pakistan. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University Korea. E-mail: daring511@hotmail.com. view at Google scholar / view at publisher Sarwar, A., & Bastiaanssen, W. G. (2001). Long-term effects of irrigation water conservation on crop production and environment in semiarid areas. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 127(6), 331-338. view at Google scholar / view at publisher https://scholar.google.com.pk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Farmers%E2%80%99+irrigation+practices+under+Rod+Kohi+irrigation+system&btnG= https://scholar.google.com.pk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Impact+of+Rod+Kohis+improvement+on+water+conveyance+losses+and+wheat+yield&btnG= https://scholar.google.com.pk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=GoP+%282017%29.+Pakistan+economic+survey.+Pakistan+Buru+of+Statistics%2C+Islamabad&btnG= https://scholar.google.com.pk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=GoP+%282017%29.+Pakistan+economic+survey.+Pakistan+Buru+of+Statistics%2C+Islamabad&btnG= https://scholar.google.com.pk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Irrigation%2C+farm+productivity+and+poverty+reduction+in+kpk%3A+understanding+direct+and+indirect+impacts+and+linkages&btnG= https://doi.org/10.1037/e582902013-005 https://scholar.google.com.pk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Impacts+of+mini+dams+on+socioeconomic+development+of+farmers+of+rainfed+region&btnG= https://scholar.google.com.pk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Impacts+of+mini+dams+on+socioeconomic+development+of+farmers+of+rainfed+region&btnG= https://scholar.google.com.pk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Productivity+of+mini+dams+in+pothwar+plateau%3A+a+diagnostic+analysis.+Research+briefings.&btnG= mailto:daring511@hotmail.com https://scholar.google.com.pk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Hill+torrents+management+for+increasing+agricultural+activity+in+Pakistan.&btnG= https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20140206.20 https://scholar.google.com.pk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Long-term+effects+of+irrigation+water+conservation+on+crop+production+and+environment+in+semiarid+areas.&btnG= https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2001)127:6(331)