Microsoft Word - 18985-Article-writer2-new In Receive doi:10.5 Abstra Univers as an a strategi Machin artificia nsights T T ed: Oct. 20, 5296/ajfa.v ct sity ranking artifact of t c insights ne learning al intelligen into Un Expla A.E Departm Pompea Co Tel: 203-93 Departm Pompea Co Tel: 203-93 Pompea Tel: 203-9 2024 A 16i2.18985 gs exert con their constr to universi tools such nce (XAI), niversit ainable E. Rodrigue ment of Eco ollege of Bu West Hav 32-7372 E Geo ment of Acc ollege of Bu West Hav 2-7000 E B a College o West Hav 932-7115 ccepted: No URL: ht nsiderable i ruction, ran ity adminis h as interp taking aim 1 ty Com AI Cou ez (Corresp onomics & usiness, Un ven, CT 065 E-mail: arod orge Heudo counting, M usiness, Un ven, CT 065 E-mail: gheu Brian Kench of Business, ven, CT 065 E-mail: bk ov. 24, 2024 https://doi.or influence in nkings are l strators’ int pretable ma m at pierci Asian mposite unterfa onding auth Business A iversity of N 514, USA driguez@ne orfer Marketing & iversity of N 514, USA udorfer@ne h Office of th 514, USA kench@new 4 Publ rg/10.5296/ n higher-edu largely unh tent on im achine lear ing obscure n Journal of F Rankin actuals hor) Analytics New Haven ewhaven.edu Finance New Haven ewhaven.edu he Dean whaven.edu lished: Dece ajfa.v16i2.1 ucation dec helpful in c mproving th rning (IML e, black-bo Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro ngs fro n u n du ember 1, 20 18985 cision-maki conveying p heir college L) and exp ox algorithm ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ om 024 ng. Yet, practical ’s rank. plainable ms have gained appraisi of USA by educ great op ranking Keywo counter a lot of inte ing Univers A MBA pro cational stak pportunities gs. rds: colleg rfactual erest recentl sity ranking grams, we keholders to s for interve ge rankings, ly. Howeve gs. In this w show how o rankings o ention and , local outl 2 er, there app work, using a counterfact outcomes. strategizing lier factors; Asian pear to be fe as represent tual XAI ca Explainin g. The meth unsupervis n Journal of F ew deploym tative datase an support p g individua hod is appli sed classifi Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro ments of the et the QS R proactive re al prediction icable to an ication; IM ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ ir use in Rankings esponses ns opens ny extant L, XAI, 1. Intro Most in value o peddle may no evaluate 2006).” taken on Choosin univers features unobser to an in confide human establis they att This in credenc markets bluster features The po third-pa ranking consum to prosp The tas part, u inscruta Kuncl, concept The sco ranking oduction ndividuals h of education a product w ot be entire e the produc ” In creden n faith in th ng a colleg ities and c s. But the rvable one. ndividual’s ence, before capital and sh how muc tended (Carn formational ce goods m s such as th and puffery s, its promis ossibility of arty evaluat gs platform mers of univ pective cust sk of aggreg useful to p able and un 2014) (Ryb tualizing an ores ascribe g of ranks. P have difficu nal institutio whose value ely clear. T ct’s utility i nce goods m he producer. ge is a diffi olleges in e most imp It is difficu human cap e attending, d earnings ch of a per nevale, Che l asymmetr arkets can c he higher e y, and may ses (Li, Hor f unchecked tors such as ms. Univers versity servi tomers. gating dispa prospective nhelpful to binski & W nd construct ed to colleg Put different ulty accurat ons. Like a e is difficult This asymm is what char markets the . ficult task p quality, am ortant crite ult to ascert pital. A stu , how much capacity. In rson’s lifetim eah, & Van y between create exter education m y even tread rta, & Jung, d marketing s the US N sity ranking ices. Rankin arate inform students a the college Wodecki, 20 tion of comp ges, and list tly, attribute 3 tely apprais auto mechan t to determ metry of in racterizes “c e promise of partly becau menities, pr eria for pic tain the incr udent will b h a particu ndeed, it is me accomp Der Werf, 2 universities rnalities – u market, selle d the fraudu 2022) (Lee g hyperbole News & Wo gs exist as ngs can imp mation into and consum es and unive 022). The posite ranki ted in a ran es are selec Asian “Who com is rea sing the ind nics, and g ine before c nformation credence go f delivering use of the ograms, ex cking where remental va be unable t ular college s very diffi plishments 2019) (Pont s and prosp unintended ers may be ulent in pub e, 2009) (Th e and crede orld Report s a supple part indepen an individu mers. Ho ersities them issue lies ings. nkings platfo cted, measur n Journal of F es out on top lly about who Ma dividual qua astroenterol consuming and a per oods (Dullec g on what is considerabl xpense, loca e to go to alue of a col to know wi will contri icult even a are attribut ton, 2024). pective stud costs. In a less than c blicizing its haddeus, 20 ence goods s College R ement in a ndent, trustw ualized met owever, ran mselves (G with their form are an red, ranked, Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro p in any rankin o is doing the alcolm Gladwe alities and logists, univ it and even rsistent inab ck & Kersc s promised le variation ation, amon school ma llege’s cont ith any me ribute to his after gradu table to the dents charac highly com candid, be p s achieveme 022). s invites a Rankings an aid of pro worthy info tric is, for t nkings are Gnolek, Falc “secret sau arbitrary w , and the ran ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ ng system ranking.” ell (2011) ultimate versities n then, it bility to chbamer, must be n among ng other y be an tribution aningful s or her uation to college cterizing mpetitive prone to ents and role for nd other spective ormation the most largely ciano, & uce:” the weighted nks then combin ranking may als also tha is that closely- masks a In sum, this han Ozkul, Ranking publish provide ranking be done beyond makers. is that u model covariat If we c academ univers want to revealin underst Some r solution intellige Molont nature c (Guidot Counter the outc why a differen such as (Nagy & de Oliv Miikku Vandier ned (often w gs. Ordinari so be arbitra at the rankin all this di -held inform any number , drawing ac ndicap with & Marks, 2 gs’ opacity ers provide ed on how g, and what e differently the constit . Intentiona universities structure, p tes with the consider, fo mic minor l ity’s specif o review th ng only the and how to elief and as ns and appli ence (XAI) ay, 2024). characterizi tti, 2024). rfactual exp come of a b specific ran nt outcome s leasing re & Molontay veira, Goet lainen, 20 rendonck, 2 with weigh ily the weig ary; the wei ngs disguise izzying alg mation - ma r of data ar ctionable in many mach 2019). renders the e little to no each variab each unive y. Rankings tuent score ally or not, t and colleg predictor im e outcomes. or example leagues by fic position e soundnes constituen change the ssistance ha ications in i (Gnolek, F These too ng the more planations s lack-box ra nk and mor (Molnar 20 equests, coll y, 2024), he thals, Brug 014), credi 2022), etc. hting) to pr ghting is ar ightings of t e the size o gebraic kne akes the fina rtifacts, incl nsights from hine learnin em unhelpfu o explanatio ble impact rsity is doin s’ inability variables c the implicit es should re mportance, , the case an extant are of inter ss of the ou t variable m outcome. as reached a interpretabl Falciano, & ls were rece e complex a suggest wha anking syste re importan 020). Counte lege dropou ealth-care tr hmans, & it scoring 4 roduce a fi rbitrary; the the subordi of the value eading – th al rankings luding the r m college ran ng models th ul in convey on as to wh an individu ng – or not to offer co can be esp t assumption epair all the underlying of a partic t rankings rest to the u utcome, the metrics for academic st le machine Kuncl, 201 ently introd algorithms. at should be em (Wachte ntly, what erfactual ar ut predictio riage (Salim Martens, 2 (McGrath Asian inal ranking e weighting inate rankin differences he exact m arbitrary. T relationship nkings is di hat mask th ying practic hat drives th ual universi doing – rig olleges any ecially frus n set forth b e attributes g relationsh cular univer purveyor, university. e validity o the rank ac trategists at learning ( I 4) (Rybinsk duced to ass Among the e different i er et al. 2017 changes in re used acro on (Zhang, miparsa, 202 2023), univ h, et al., n Journal of F g. There m gs of the su ngs may also s between th method som This entangl s between i ifficult. Coll he process a cal strategic he rankings. ity’s positio ght or wrong finer guida strating for by college r set forth. R hips, predic rsity unfairl the reasons The aggrie f the proce chieved, can t the heels o IML) and ex ki & Wodec ist with pier em are coun in the input 7). Counterf the feature oss a range Dong, Lv, 23), job app versity adm 2018) (D Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro may be sub ubordinate r o be differe he ranks. T metimes gua lement undo individual f llege rankin adopted (Ro c insights. R . No explan on in the p g, and how ance or exp academic rankings pu Rankings pr ctor comple ly relegated s for the eved colleg ess. An exp n be insuffi of the expl xplainable a cki, 2022) ( rcing the bl nterfactual m instance to factuals can es would le of real appl Lin, & Ba plications ( mission (W Dastile, Ce ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ ordinate rankings ent. Note he point arded as oubtedly features. ngs share odriguez, Rankings nation is proffered could it planation decision ublishers roffer no exity, or d to the afflicted ge would planation ficient to osion of artificial (Nagy & lack-box methods o change n answer ead to a lications ai, 2022) (Barbosa Waters & elik, & In this intellige Ranking counterf values o (Brughm We illu program platform We do counter topic is we set f using th last and discusse 2. Bac The ratc market univers ameniti these p approac 2021). advance Interpre outcom and an counter reported instituti By con Shapley how mu Singh, generat the feat Counter conside study, we ence metho gs outcom rfactuals; th of the colle mans, Leym ustrate the a ms. Our wo m beyond th so as follow rfactuals as sizable – a forth our m he lowest-ra d fifth secti ed here. ckground a cheting-up o has foster ities, count ies, and foc platforms h ch for univ Aiding re ed tools, suc etable mach me of black-b n excellent rfactual exp d feature v ion’s rank. ntrast, metho y Values ex uch each fe & Guestrin e data poin tures. rfactual me ered model- e show how odologies ca mes. Specifi he algorithm ege of intere man, & Mar argument, m ork stands a hose focused ws: in the a particular and we cann ethodology anked colle ion provide and Related of the alrea red a proli tries, conti cus, inter al have follow ersity comp searchers in ch as explai hine learnin box machin one for planations. C values of an ods such as xplain an in eature contr n). Counterf nts with a di ethods can agnostic if i w counterf an support ically, we m searches est with the tens, 2021) method, and as a proof-o d on US MB next sectio rly useful p not presume . A fourth s ege in the Q es concludin d Work dy intense c iferation of nents, size lia. Scholar wed closely petitiveness n this probe inable and i ng methods ne learning the task o Counterfactu n institution s Local Inte nstitution’s p ributed to th factual expl ifferent, des n be either it applies to 5 factual met proactive r use the a for counte e correspond . d its use w of-concept; BA program on we provi piece from t e to be exha section cont QS survey a ng commen competitive f ranking p , regions, rs seeking t y (Estrada- s: the QS w e have been interpretable s were intr models. An of explainin uals work b n that woul erpretable M position in he proffered lanations d sired predic model-agn o any algori Asian thods draw responses b algorithm erfactuals by ding value ith data the its applica ms. ide a succin the XAI too austive in o tains our res as a hypoth nts includin e pressures i platforms. programs, to understan -Real & C world, 2022 convention e AI approa roduced to n especially ng single by determin ld change t Model-agno the ranking d rank (Lun iffer from f ction instead nostic or m thm. In turn n Journal of F wn from ex by education NICE from y iteratively of its most e 2024 QS ability exten nct review o olbox; the v our review. sults. The m hetical, fictit ng limitation impacting th These plat emphasis, nd, grade, p Cantu-Ortiz, 2) (Gadd, H nal tools as w aches (Guid explain the useful met predictions ning the sma he model’s stic Explan gs leaderboa ndberg & L feature attri d of attribut model-speci n, model-ag Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro xplainable a nal stakeho m the R y replacing similar ins Rankings o nds to any of existing w volume of t In the third method is ill tious examp ns of the a he higher ed tforms vary public or predict, and A data a Holmes, & well as mor dotti, 2024). e performa thod in this s of a mo allest chang s prediction nations (LIM ard by dete Lee, 2017) ( ributions sin uting a predi ific. A me gnostic meth ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ artificial olders to package g feature titutions of MBA ranking work on he latter d section lustrated ple. The approach ducation y across private, d qualify analytics Shearer, re recent, nce and toolbox odel are ge to the n of that ME) and ermining (Ribeiro, nce they iction to ethod is hods can be glob local on interest focus to 2018). 3. Meth Univers scales aggrega organiz and ran controll 3.1 Loc The Lo identify comput around than the variable The LO nuisanc nearest a direct probabi indicate for iden detectio college approac where, p Local O (often c bal or specif nes are mo is in expla o model-sp hodology sity ranking are based ating a we zation that p nking metho ling the con cal Outlier P ocal Outlie ying outlier ting the loc other data p eir neighbor es, numeric OF algorithm ce paramete neighbors. t measure ility the mo es that a da ntifying po on or identi selection ch set forth p is the poi Outlier Facto called “exten fic. Global ore concerne aining a par pecific appr gs are an in on the ide ighted seri publishes co odology. Th nstruction of Probabilitie er Factor ( rs in a data cal density s points. It co rs. One of and catego m requires er. It then c In turn, the of the like ore likely th ta point is m oints that a ifying finan process als in Alghushh m int being ev or of point p nt”). The PL explanation ed with ind rticular out roaches as nstance of ea that an es of indiv ollege ranki here is no a f the variou es (LOF) algo aset (Breun surrounding onsiders out f the appeal rical colum the specifi alculates th e local outli elihood of e data point more likely re significa ncial frailty. so constitut hairy, et. al 𝐿 max 0, 𝑒𝑟 𝑓 valuated, er p and 𝜆 is a LOF is calc 6 ns reflect th dividual pre tcome in un in Wachter what are k underlying vidual quan ings relies o priori appl us published orithm is a nig, Kriegel g a given d tliers sampl ling propert mns. fication of k he distance ier probabil the point b nt is to be an y to be non- antly differ . The hetero tes a good . (Alghushh 𝐿𝑜𝑂𝑃 𝑝 𝑓 𝑃𝐿𝑂𝐹 𝑝 𝜆 ∗ √2 r f is the err a parameter culated as in Asian he average b edictions (M niversity ran r et al (Wa known as c g or latent ntitative an on its own licable meth d rankings. an unsuper l, Ng, & S data point a les that hav ties of LOF k-nearest n between th lity, which r being an ou n outlier. By -outlier data rent from t ogeneity of example. hairy, Alsin 𝑝 2 ror function controlling n Equation ( n Journal of F behavior of Molnar, 202 nkings platf achter, Mitt omposite ra measure c nd qualitativ set of guide hodology an rvised dete ander, 2000 and compare e a substant is that it ca eighbors of he data poin ranges from utlier. The y contrast, a point. The heir neighb f the attribu In our wor i, Soule, & n, PLOF(p) g the sensitiv (2): Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro the model 22). Given forms we l telstadt, & ating scales can be gau ve features delines, pref nd thus no s ection appr 0). It does es it to the tially lower an work wit f a data po nt and each m 0 to 1, con higher the a low outlie e algorithm bors such a utes involve rk we rely Ma, 2021). 1 is the Prob vity of the m ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ whereas that our imit our Russell, s. These uged by s. Every ferences, standard roach to this by e density r density th mixed oint as a of its k nstitutes e outlier er factor m is ideal as fraud ed in the y on the babilistic methods Where LRD of 3.2 Dat We use (Estrada QS wor Global Entrepr and (5) value b highest the QS Table 1 Institution Stanford Grad Penn (Wharto Harvard Busi MIT (Sloan) University of University o Business William & M Worcester Po Note. Top an The QS instance ranked 𝐿𝑅𝐷 𝑝 is f the k-neare ta and Data e the 2024 Q a-Real & C rld, 2022) ( MBA Rank reneurship & ) Diversity. etween 1 an score occu Rankings a . 2025 QS G duate School of on) iness School f South Florida of Tennessee, Mary (Mason) olytechnic Instit nd Bottom 4. S Rankings e, Babson 51-60 in 20 𝐿 the Local R est neighbo a Treatment QS Global Cantu-Ortiz, (Note 1). Q king: US ve & Alumni O Each featu nd100. The upying the fi as well as th Global MBA f Business (Muma) Knoxville – tute (Foisie) do not avo College an 024. 𝐿𝑅𝐷 𝑝 𝐿𝑅𝐷 𝑁 𝑝 Reachability rs of p. MBA rank , A data an S makes its ersion, cons Outcomes, ure is subse institutions first position he Bottom fo A Rankings Haslam Colle id ties and nd Texas A 7 𝑃𝐿𝑂𝐹 𝑝 1 y Density o kings for the nalytics appr s data publi sist of five f (3) Return equently w s are then li n in the rank our. s: US Empl 97.6 98.6 96.4 98.6 ... 26.2 ege of 27 39.3 34.3 often assig A&M are ra Asian of point p an e United St roach for u icly availab features. Th on Investm weighted to sted in desc king. Table loy Entrep Alumni Outcome 6 100 6 83.9 4 96.9 6 88.4 ... 2 34.5 27.2 3 42.8 3 29.1 n a range r anked 27 in n Journal of F nd 𝐿𝑅𝐷 𝑁 tates to illus university co ble. QS’s r hese are (1) ment, (4) Th yield an ov cending ord 1 lists the t es Return on Invest T 90.9 95 90.4 90.5 ... 26.6 60.5 29.2 35.5 ather than a n 2024; Le Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro 2 𝑝 is the strate our a ompetitiven rankings fo ) Employab hought Lea verall score der, the one top four col Thought Leader D 95.2 95.9 96.5 99.1 ... 48.7 30 43.9 37.9 a specific ra ehigh Univ ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ average approach ness: the or the 25 ility, (2) adership, e with a with the lleges in Diversity 68.9 78.3 72.9 70.5 ... 57.3 38.8 49.8 48.9 ank. For ersity is Accord necessa the Loc detectio In turn, measure The Lo accordin variable dataset Table 2 Instituti Emory UC San Tampa Michig Univers Brigham Univers Howard Note. T To illus and find SVM r reconsti ingly, to re ary refineme cal Outlier on approach , the local o e of the like oF algorithm ngly. The m e. Table 2 listed accor 2. 2025 QS G ion (Goizueta) n Diego (Rady) (Sykes) gan (Ross) sity of Massach m Young (Marr sity at Albany d University Top and bottom strate via a d the three regression ituted rank emove both ents, we re- Factor. Th h to identify outlier prob elihood of th m is ideal fo measure of 2 contains th rding to the Global MBA husetts (Dartmo riott) 4. fictitious ca “counterfa of the re from the alg the arbitrar ranked the he Local O ying outliers bability (Lo he point bei or identifyin LoOP is m he data set reconstitute A Reconstit Employ 60.2 35.1 35.5 83.6 ... outh) 26.3 29.5 26.8 38.9 ase study, w actual institu econstituted gorithm for 8 riness of th data using u Outlier Fact s in a datase oOP), which ing dissimil ng similarit multiplied by displaying ed rankings tuted Ranki y Entrep Alumni Outcomes 43.7 45.7 46.4 70.3 ... 27.5 48 27.5 34.3 we select th utions” mos rankings r the univers Asian he weighting unsupervise tor (LOF) et (Breunig, h ranges fro lar from eac ties among y 100; it is the first an s, labelled L ings: US Return on Investment 93.4 59.8 72 98 ... 51 78.5 27.1 86.5 e lowest ran st like it. Th on the Q sity is 94.2. n Journal of F gs and the i ed cluster an algorithm i Kriegel, N om 0 to 1, ch other. institutions then used nd last three LoOP Ranks Thought Leadership 55.1 53 39.2 79.8 ... 21.1 48.3 38.2 31.4 nked institu he predictor QS attribute Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro inability to nalysis; spe is an unsup Ng, & Sande constitutes s and rankin to create a e institution s. Diversi 52.6 48.6 62.9 67.3 ... 44.5 28.8 27.3 34.3 ution in our or obtained es. The p ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ provide cifically, pervised er, 2000). a direct ng them ranking ns of the ity ranking from an predicted Table 3 Institu 122 We cho 4. Resu The fea order o element The gap reflects the thre shows t instituti . Attribute V ution 2 oose to exam ults ature analys of importan ts associate Figure p analysis the positio ee identified the differen ion used her Values for S Employabil Score 38.9 mine counte is in Figure nce. These d with the u e 1. Most Im from the c on of the un d counterfa ntials, or gap re as a proto Sampled In lity E erfactuals in e 1 displays attributes university ch mportant At counterfactu niversity and actuals. To ps, that need otypical exa 9 nstitution Entrep 34.3 n the desired the attribut identify the hosen for th ttributes. 20 ual exercise d indicates t improve fr d to be clos ample, and t Asian ROI 86.5 d outcome in tes responsi e relative c he case stud 024 QS MB e is visible the differen rom its cur sed or reduc the counterf n Journal of F Though Leadersh 31.4 nterval of 8 ble for the u contribution dy. A Rankings in Figure nce between rrent last-pl ced between factuals. Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro ht hip D 80 to 85. university’s ns of the r s USA 2. The dar n the univer lace rank, F n the lowes ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ iversity 34.3 s rank in rankings rker line rsity and Figure 2 t ranked These r of the improve attentio 5. Conc Advanc way w especia their co We des informa ranking end, we identifie adminis results shoul institution. ement. The on. cluding Co ces in mach we analyze lly compos onstruction, scribe and a ation. To ill gs of US MB e selected t ed actionab strators inte ld inform an Note that e university mments ine learning complex p ite rankings which cont articulate th lustrate its i BA program the lowest r ble attribute ent on impro ny actionab the univer y’s employ Figure g have led t problems, s rely on ela tribute to the he use of XA insights, we ms and appl ranked insti es in the s oving their Q 10 ble strategy rsity’s dive yability effo e 2. Gap An to the creati such as sc aborate, com eir inherent AI counterf e explained lied the me itution in th ense that i QS ranking Asian intended to ersity score orts could nalysis ion of powe crutinizing mplex, and t opacity. factuals to e the approac ethod to a h he data set t allows a s position. n Journal of F improve th e leaves sig similarly b erful tools th college ra often close extract insig ch using the ypothetical as the stand clear roadm Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro he rankings gnificant ro benefit from hat have alt ankings. Ra ely held me ghts and ac e well-regar institution. d-in. The a map for un ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ position oom for m some tered the ankings, ethods in ctionable rded QS . To this approach niversity It shoul by the e ranking Thus, th shortcom Howeve suggest approac method an actio from th Second both, ra and pro measure the exte here wo of rank develop Notes Note 1 Septem https://w visited O Referen Alghush Algorith doi:http Barbosa Unveili https://a Breunig Local O Manage Brughm Nearest doi:http ld be clear t extent and n g platform u he method h mings of an er, these tw ts a particul ch need not d here return on plan resu he analysis o , in their co ankings hav ofessional es were abs ent the rank ould natural kings. This p long-term : Source: mber 19, www.kaggl October 4, 2 nces hhairy, O., hms for ps://doi.org/ a de Olive ing the P arxiv.org/pd g, M., Krieg Outliers. P ement of da mans, D., L t Instan ps://doi.org/ that any an nature of the used here is here is limi ny of the ran wo limitation lar approach t base their ns different ulting from a of two or mo onstruction, ve changed preferences sent from th kings platfo lly return di information strategies. https://www 2024; 20 e.com/datas 2024. Alsini, R., Outlier /10.3390/bd ira, R. M., Potential o df/2305.100 gel, H.-P., N Proceedings ata, 93-104. Leyman, P., nce Cou /10.48550/a alysis, insig e features co s limited to ted in its ab nking platfo ns of the pro h to harvest analysis on t salient var a bespoke c ore ranking , whether in and adapte s. For exa he earlier ve orm adapted ifferent reco n could pro w.topuniver 025 data sets/darryllj Soule, T., & . Big dcc5010001 , Goethals, of Counte 069 Ng, R. T., & s of the 2 doi:https:// , & Marten unterfactual arXiv.2104.0 11 ghts or any onstituting t o five QS-s bility to circ orms used. oposed meth ting actiona n only one riables from cost-benefit gs platforms n the variab ed over the ample, toda ersions of th d their meth ommendatio ovide deepe rsities.com/ is also jk/worlds-b & Ma, X. ( Data a S., Brughm erfactuals. & Sander, J. 000 ACM /doi.org/10. ns, D. (202 l Explan 07411 Asian derived str the scrutiniz specified fea cumvent an hodology su able informa ranking. T m different r analysis of . bles chosen, years to ac ay’s appea he most esta hodology ov ons when ap er insights /mba-rankin available est-universi 2021). A R and Cogn mans, D., arXiv:2305 . (2000). LO SIGMOD 1145/34200 21, April 1 nations. n Journal of F ategic impli zed ranking atures of U y built-in b uggest the f ation. Prosp o the exten rankings, a f the various , their assig ccommodate l for diver ablished col ver time, th pplied to pri for admini ngs/united-s e as a ities-qs-rank Review of L nitive Co & Martens 5.10069v1. OF: Identify internation 09.335388 5). NICE: arxiv.org/ Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro lications are gs. For exam US MBA pr biases or con following. pective user nt that apply college cou s variables o gned weight e changes i rsity and in llege rankin he method p rior, earlier v istrators loo states/2024, Kaggle kings-2025/ Local Outlie Computing, s, D. (2023 Retrieved ying Densit nal confere An Algori /abs/2104.0 ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ e limited mple, the rograms. nceptual First, it rs of this ying the uld craft obtained tings, or in social nclusion ngs. To proposed versions oking to visited dataset; /data, er Factor 1-24. 3, May). d from ty-Based ence on ithm for 07411v2. Carneva College Retriev https://r sequenc Dastile, Explana Dulleck Special 5-42. do Estrada univers Manufa Estrada compet Manufa Gadd, E Univers doi:http Gnolek Variatio the doi:http Guidott benchm doi:http Lee, https://w Li, X., Conseq Handbo doi:DO Lundbe In I. G Garnett http://pa ale, A. P., C es. Washing ed repository.li ce=1&isAll , X., Celik ations. IEEE k, U., & K ists: The E oi:DOI: 10. a-Real, A. C ity competi acturing, 87 a-Real, A. C itiveness: acturing, 16 E., Holmes sity Ra ps://doi.org/ , S. L., Fa on in U.S. N Top ps://doi.org/ ti, R. (2024 marking. ps://doi.org/ S. (2009 www.inside Horta, H., quences. In ook on Ed OI: https://do erg, S. M., & Guyon, U. V t. M apers.nips.c Cheah, B., & gton, DC: G ibrary.georg lowed=y k, T., & V E Access, 1 Kerschbamer Economics o 1257/00220 C., & Cant itiveness: th 71-891. doi:h C., & Cantu the QS w 6, 871-891. d s, R., & Sh ankings. /10.29024/s alciano, V. News & Wo 20? /10.1007/s1 ). Counterfa Data Mi /10.1007/s1 9, August ehighered.co & Jung, J. W. O. L ducaton De oi.org/10.10 & Lee, S.-I. V. Luxburg Montreal: cc/paper/706 & Van Der Georgetown getown.edu Vandierend 0. doi:DOI r, R. (2006 of Credenc 0510677616 tu-Ortiz, F. he QS wor https://doi.o u-Ortiz, F. world. Inte doi:https://d hearer, J. (2 Scholarly ar.31 T., & Kun orld Report Research 1162-014-9 factual expla ining an 0618-022-0 t 18). R om/news/20 (2022). Un ee, P. Bro evelopment 007/978-981 (2017). A U g, S. Bengio Curran 62-a-unified 12 Werf, M. (2 University u/bitstream/h donck, H. 10.1109/AC 6, March). ce Goods,". 62717 . J. (2022, rld. nternati org/10.1007 J. (2022). ternational doi.org/10.1 2021). Deve y Asses ncl, R. W. College Ra in 9336-9 anations an d Knowl 00831-6 Reputation 009/08/19/r niversity Ra own, A. L. in Asia-P 1-16-2327-1 Unified Ap o, H. Wall an A d-approach- Asian 2019). A Fi Center on handle/1082 (2022). M CCESS.202 On Doctor Journal of July 9). A ional Journ 7/s12008-02 A data ana Journal 1007/s12008 eloping a M ssment (2014, May ankings: Wh Higher d how to fi ledge Di Without eputation-w anking Gam . Goodwin Pacific. Sin 1_91-1 pproach to In lach, R. Fe Associates. -to-interpret n Journal of F irst Try at R Education a 22/1060569 odel-Agnos 22.3177783 rs, Mechan f Economic A data anal nal on Inter 22-00966-2 alytics appro on Interac 8-022-0096 Method for Reports, y 18). Mod hat would it Educat nd them: lit iscovery, Rigor. without-rigo mes in East , & A. Gr gapore: Sp nterpreting rgus, S. Vi Retr ting-model- Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro ROI: Rankin and the Wo 9/College_R stic Counte nics, and C c Literature lytics appro ractive Des oach for un ctive Desig 66-2 Evaluating 3(1), deling Chan t really take tion, 7 terature rev 38, 277 Retrieved or Asia: Trigg reen, Inter pringer, Sin Model Pred ishwanathan rieved -predictions ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ ng 4,500 orkforce. from ROI.pdf? erfactual omputer e, 44(1), oach for sign and niversity gn and g Global 1-19. nge and e to be in 761-769. view and 70-2824. d from gers and national ngapore. dictions. n, & R. from s.pdf McGrat Interpre http://a Molnar Nagy, M Persona 274-300 Ponton, Private doi:http Ribeiro Predicti Confere Associa Rodrigu in Ran doi:http Rybinsk An ana doi:http Salimip Canadi https://p Thadde Ranking https://w Wachte Openin Techno Waters, Admiss Zhang, potentia Journal th, R., Cos etable Cre rxiv.org/abs , C. (2022). M., & Mol alized Interv 0. doi:https: , M. K. (2 Universiti ps://doi.org/ o, M. T., Sin ions of An ence on Kn ation for Co uez, A. E., nkings: an ps://doi.org/ ki, K., & W alysis of 5 ps://doi.org/ parsa, M. ( an Con pdfs.semant eus, M. (202 g. www.math. er, S., Mitt g the Black logy, 31, 84 , A., & Mii sions. AI Ma H., Dong, al dropout b l of Visualiz stabello, L. edit Appl s/1811.0524 . Interpretab lontay, R. ( vention. Int ://doi.org/10 024). Finan ies in the /10.5296/jse ngh, S., & ny Classifi nowledge D omputing M Ozkul, A. S Illustrative /10.1080/25 Wodecki, A. 00 univers /10.1080/08 (2023). Co nference ticscholar.o 22, February columbia.ed elstadt, B., k Box: Aut 41-854. ikkulainen, agazine, 35( J., Lv, C., behavior pa zation, 26, 7 ., Sweeney lication P 45. Retrieve ble Machine (2024). Inte ternational 0.1007/s405 ncial Return United S e.v14i1.215 Guestrin, C ier. Procee Discovery a Machinery. S., & Mark e Case of 573234X.20 (2022, Mar sities in Go 8841241.202 unterfactua on A rg/3c3c/2b7 y). An Inves du/~thaddeu & Russell tomated De R. (2014). (1), 64-75. , Lin, Y., & atterns in o 723-741. do 13 y, P., Kami Predictions ed from http e Learning. erpretable D Journal of 593-023-00 n on Inves States. Jou 67 C. (n.d.). W edings of t and Data M ks, B. A. (20 State Ran 019.1605312 rch 13). Are oogle Tren 22.2049952 al Explanat Artificial 75ea9b6b04 estigation of Retrieve us/ranking/ l, C. (2018 ecisions and . GRADE: & Bai, J. ( online learn oi:https://do Asian iab, F., Sh With C p://arxiv.org Dropout Pre f Artificial I 331-8 stment: An urnal of S Why Should the 22nd A Mining, Kdd 019). Expla nkings. Jou 2 e university nds and the 2 ions for R Intellige 4127e56d2f f the Facts B ed investigatio 8). Counter d the GDPR Machine L (2022, Nove ning based o i.org/10.100 n Journal of F hen, Z., & Counterfactu g/abs/1811.0 ediction: To Intelligence Analysis o Studies in I Trust Yo ACM SIGK d San Fran aining the Im urnal of B ranking and e QS ranki Rankings. P ence. R fd80a7e191 Behind Col on.html rfactual Exp R. Harvard Learning Su ember 5). V on counterf 07/s12650-0 Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2024, Vol. 1 ajfa.macro Lecue, F. ual Expla 05245 owards XA e in Educat of the Top- Education, ou?: Explain KDD Inter ncisco. New mpact of Pr Business An d popularity king in 201 Proceedings Retrieved 175104.pdf lumbia’s U. planations Journal of upport for G Visual anal factual expl 022-00899- ccounting 946-052X 16, No. 2 think.org/ (2018). anations. AI-Based tion, 34, -Ranked , 14(1). ning the national w York: redictors nalytics. y related? 12-2020. s of the from f S. News from Without f Law & Graduate lytics of lanation. -8