Microsoft Word - 2096-8225-1-RV-writer2-new Ac Receive doi:10.5 Abstra The pur percept irrespec the data and com account lecturer most im regardin study. Keywo countin ed: July 12, 5296/ajfa.v4 ct rpose of thi ions of goo ctive of the a which wer mpare them ting and en rs’ commen mportant in ng the impo rds: Accou ng and Good 2012 A 4i2.2096 s study is to od teaching area of stu re used to e m with tho ngineering u nts on their dicators of ortance of in unting, Engi Engine d Teach Dr. Murdoc Mur Accepted: A URL: htt o investigate and consid udy. A good examine per ose of engi undergradua work, and f good teach ndicators of ineering, Stu 332 eering S hing in Terri Trirek ch Business rdoch Unive August 21, 2 tp://dx.doi.o e accountin der whether d teaching q rceptions of ineering st ate students feedback fr hing. Overa f good teach udents, Goo Asian Student Univer ksani s School ersity 2012 P org/10.5296 ng and engin indicators questionnair f accounting tudents. Th s agree that rom the lect all, the stud hing irrespe od Teaching n Journal of F ts' Perc rsities Published: D /ajfa.v4i2.2 neering und of good tea re was impl g students a e findings t the design turers on the dents have ctive of the g, Universiti Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi ceptions December 1 2096 dergraduate aching are c lemented to about good t suggest th n of the cou eir progress similar per eir gender or ties ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa s of , 2012 students’ common o collect teaching hat both urse, the s are the ceptions r year of 1. Intro The use teaching essentia promoti instrum the lect capture Kramer Surely define s existing good te cultural Fuhrma and Pap Tootoon This stu perceiv investig there ar the ma undergr attribute undergr percept investig students 2. Stud Feldma percept few lec enthusia related students fairness findings undergr account respons facilitat oduction e of student g has been al source o ion decisio ments that w turers’ abili d the aspec r and Tian, 2 there woul some gener g literature eaching may l values, g an, Fuhrman pageorgiou nchi, Lyons udy is inte e to be go gate this iss re perceptiv ain interest raduate stud es of good raduate stu ions of ac gates wheth s based on t dent percep an‘s (1976) ions of goo cturers’ attri astic approa students ha s, such as s and feedba s are in ag raduate acc ting teachin sible and co te independ ratings util commonly of informa ons. There were used to ity to prom cts of good 2003; Vieir d not be a rally accept in this area y be influe gender, age n and De L , 2009; Ke s and Hagen erested in o ood indicat ue in gener ve differenc is the per dents. Henc d teaching dents, and ccounting s her there ar their gender tions of goo paper whi od teaching ibutes, such ach as good ave suggest communica ack (e.g. Ho greement w counting s ng, such as onscientiou ent thinking ising studen y used as a ation in pe have bee o collect the mote learning teaching th ra, 2002). H clearly def ted indicato a. Prior stud nced by va and level Lay, 2010; G ember, Jenk n, 2002; Xia obtaining th tors of go ral, but ther ces between ceptions of ce, the mai are consi to examin students an re any diff r and year o od teaching ich examin suggested h as clear s d indicators ed a few go ation skills, olmes and P with Xiao tudents wh s being kn us, making g. 333 nt perceptio major com erformance en some c e data from g or wheth hat the stude Hence, the m finitive ans ors of good dies have a arious facto of educat Goodwin a kins and N ao and Dyso he views o od teachin re has been n students w f good teac in purposes idered imp ne whether nd those of ferences be of study. g ned more t that engine speech and s of good te ood indicat , knowledg Papageorgio and Dyson hich sugge nowledgeabl teaching in Asian ons of lectur mponent in t manageme omments a the student er the indic ents want ( main questio swer to this teaching b also suggest ors, such as tion (e.g. B nd Stevens g, 2003, 20 on, 1999). of undergra g. There h a lack of st who study i ching from s of this st portant by there are f engineeri etween the han 70 stu eering under explanation eaching. Pr ors of good e of the su ou, 2009; T n’s (1999) ested a few le, effective nteresting, n Journal of F rers’ perform teaching ev ent in gen and criticis ts, whether cators in th e.g. Blackm on is “What s question, ased on var ted that stud among oth Botas, 2008 , 1993; Hat 004; Mitsis aduate stude have been tudies that i n different m accountin tudy are to accounting any differe ng student perceptions udies that e rgraduate st n, well prep rior studies d teaching a ubject matte Tootoonchi e study on t w good in e teaching and ability Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi mance in un valuation an neral, inclu sms regard they could he instrumen more, 2009; t is good tea although w rious studie dent percep hers, area o 8; Feldman tiva, 1984; s and Foley dents on wh some stud investigate area. In thi ng and eng o investigate g and eng ences betw ts. The stu s of underg evaluated s tudents perc pared lectu involving b as perceived er, overall et al., 2002 the percep ndicators o approaches y to encour ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa niversity nd as an uding in ding the d capture nts have Emery, aching?” we could es in the ptions of of study, n, 1976; Holmes y, 2009; hat they dies that whether is study, gineering e which gineering ween the udy also graduate students’ ceived a ures, and business d by the attitude, ). These tions of of good s, being age and Conside account literatur P1 Acc teaching Existing findings undergr percept that cou adopts namely P2 Fem scales c Some p undergr Kratchm Howeve undergr there ar to inves P3 Und irrespec 3. Rese 3.1 The This stu (see ww a course such as The que six GT question seven it 2 = of Subsequ respond ering that ting and eng re, this stud counting un g scales com g literature s on wheth raduate stu ions of cult uld explain this sugges : male underg compared w prior studie raduate, ma man, 2001; er, there ha raduate stud re no prior s stigate this s dergraduate ctive of thei earch metho e survey inst udy utilises ww.graduate e and uses s comments, estionnaire i TS items wi nnaire asked tems using a f little impo uently, sev dents’ area o it is diffic gineering un dy develops ndergradua mpared with in this are her percepti udents. One turally dive variation in stion from M graduate stu with their ma es in perce aster and Fuhrman e as been a lac dents about studies that subject by t e students w ir year of stu od trument the Good T ecareers.com six items to feedback, m in this study ith one add d the respon a five-point ortance; 3 = veral questi of study, gen cult to indi ndergraduat a tentative ate students h engineerin a has not p ions of goo e notable s erse busines n students’ p Mitsis and udents will ale counterp eptions of doctoral st et al., 2010 ck of studie t good teac could prov esting the fo will have re udy. Teaching Sc m.au). GTS measure stu motivation, y was design ditional que ndents’ perc scale. The f = moderate ons were a nder, and y 334 icate the d ate students proposition s will have ing undergr provided a od teaching study by M ss students perceptions Foley (200 have relati parts. good teach tudents (e.g 0; Tootoonc es that exam ching at dif vide some in following pr elatively sim cales (GTS) focuses on udent perce ability to ex ned as an an estion abou ceptions abo five points r ely importa added to th year of stud Asian differences regarding g n, namely: e relatively raduate stud clear sugge g are differe Mitsis and suggested t of good tea 09), and dev ively simila hing have g. Botas, 2 chi et al., 2 mine the diff fferent leve n indication roposition: milar score developed the nature o eptions of te xplain, effo nonymous q ut the abili out the level represented ant; 4 = im he question dy (i.e. first, n Journal of F between th good teachin y similar sc dents. estion or co ent between Foley (200 that gender aching. Acc velops a ten ar scores in examined t 2008; Crum 002; Xiao ferences of els of study ns on this is es in the go by Graduat of teaching aching. The rts, and emp questionnair ty to desig l of importan the followin mportant; 5 nnaire to c second or t Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi he perspec ng from the cores in th onclusive em n female an 09) examin was not a cordingly, th ntative prop n the good t the percep mbley, Hen and Dyson perceptions y. Consider sue, this stu ood teaching te Careers A experience e items cove pathy (see T re and adopt gn the cour ance of each ng: 1 = unim = very im collect data third year o ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa tives of e current he good mpirical nd male ning the variable his study position, teaching tions of nry and n, 1999). s among ring that udy tries g scales Australia d during er issues Table 1). ted these rse. The of these mportant; mportant. a on the f study). Table 1 Label GTS01 GTS03 GTS10 GTS15 GTS16 GTS27 Source: G 3.2 Par Indones forms o show th public h account Indones enginee from st signific Data w survey. few pub asked th interest regardin made on second complet describe easily. F eight re hundred respond enginee 3.3 Des Descrip . Good Tea The teach The teach The teach My lectur The teach The teach my work Graduate Care rticipants sian Nation of universit hat there a higher educ ting and eng sia. The en ering, indus tudents ma cant and hen ere collecte The data c blic places w hem wheth ed in parti ng good tea nce. A than request w te a simple ed previous Five hundre esponses w d and fou dents were ering studen scriptive sta ptive statisti aching Scale hing staff pu hing staff no hing staff of rers were ex hing staff w hing staff m . eers Australia nal Educatio ties, institut are nearly 3 cation institu gineering u ngineering strial engine ajoring in nce excluded ed only from collection pr where they her they we icipating in aching. To nk you was was made. e anonymou sly). The p ed and eigh were usable. urty eight accountin nts. atistics ics for the se es ut a lot of ti ormally gav f this course xtremely go worked hard made a real e (2011) on Systems tes, college 3,000 highe utions (see w undergradua students in eering, and other engin d from the f m responden rocess starte usually han re accounti n an anony avoid any i immediatel Those who us (Indones rocess work hty three res Two hund respondent ng students even-item s 335 Ite ime into com ve me helpfu e motivated ood at expla to make the effort to und allow high es, academi er education www.dikti. ate students ncluded in t chemical e neering rel final data. nts who we ed by rando ng out (such ing or engin ymous surv inconvenien ly given to o voluntaril sian translat ked well an sponses we dred and ei s were m s, and two scales are pr Asian m mmenting o ful feedback d me to do m aining thing eir subjects derstand diff her educatio ies, and po n institutio go.id). The attending u this study engineering lated areas, ere happy to omly approa h as shoppi neering stu vey and an nce, the req students wh ly agreed ted) questio nd response re received ighty respo male. Three o hundred resented in T n Journal of F on my work. k on how I w my best work s. interesting. ficulties I m on institutio olytechnics. ns in Indon participants universities were those g. There we , but the n o voluntaril aching univ ing malls an dents, and nswered ten quest to eac ho rejected to participa onnaire with es were rec , and five h ndents wer hundred and five Table 2. Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi . was going. rk. . might be hav ons to be ru The latest nesia inclu ts in this stu in two big e majoring ere some re numbers w ly participat versity stude nd food cou whether th n simple q ch student w the request ate were a h ten quest corded quic hundred and re female, a and twent responden ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa ving with un in the t figures uding 82 udy were cities in in civil esponses were not te in the ents at a urts) and hey were questions was only t, and no asked to tions (as ckly and d twenty and two ty three ts were Table 2 Mea Std dev Minimu Maximu 4. Anal 4.1 Ove It can b all seve received how stu 5), 4.07 mean sc with me indicato “Make mean sc some co Tootoon 4.2 Stud The me compar The init that rec students and “De 2. Good teac Comme on studen work an 4.05 0.84 um 3 um 5 lyses and fi erall studen be seen from en of the g d very high udents are g 7 (out of 5), cores: “Exp ean scores ors received a real effor cores of 3.4 onsistencies nchi et al. (2 dents’ perce eans of the red to those tial indicati ceived simi s: “Commen esign the co ching descri ent ts’ k Giv helpf feedba on ho stude are go 4.07 4 1.00 1 5 indings t perception m the descr good teachi h mean sco going”, and and 4.05 (o plain things of 3.85 (ou d moderate rt to underst 48 (out of 5 s with the f 2002), and eptions of g scores on of engineer ions from th ilar scores nt on studen ourse very w iptive statist G ve ful ack ow nts oing Motiv stude to do best w 7 3.4 0 1.2 1 5 ns of the lev riptive analy ing indicato res: “Comm “Design the out of 5) re very well” ut of 5) and mean scor tand difficu ) and 3.35 ( findings by Xiao and D good teachin good teach ring underg he descripti from both nts’ work”, well”. The re 336 tics (n = 52 Good Teachi vate ents their work Expl thin ver we 48 3.8 25 0.9 1 2 5 5 vel of impor ysis (Table ors as imp ment on stu e course ve spectively. and “Work d 3.70 (out res: “Motiv ulties studen (out of 5) re Feldman ( Dyson’s (199 ng by area o hing scales graduate stud ive statistic the accoun “Give helpf esults of the Asian 8) ing Indicato lain ngs ry ll Work to m the subj intere 85 3.7 97 1.0 1 5 rtance of go 2) that und ortant. The udents’ work ry well”, wi Two of the k hard to ma of 5) resp vate student nts might be espectively. 1976), Holm 99). of study of accounti dents are sh s showed th nting and th pful feedbac e compariso n Journal of F ors hard make eir ects esting Ma e un di stud be h th 70 04 1 5 od teaching dergraduate ere were th k”, “Give h ith mean sc indicators ake their su ectively. T ts to do the e having wit . These ove mes and Pap ing undergr hown in Tab hat there we he engineer ck on how st on of the me Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi ake a real effort to nderstand ifficulties dents might having with heir work 3.35 1.31 1 5 g indicators students pe hree indicat helpful feed cores of 4.05 received qu ubjects inter The remain eir best wo th their wor erall results apageorgiou raduate stu ble 3. ere three in ring underg tudents are ean scores f ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa Design the course very well 4.05 0.90 1 5 s erceived tors that dback on 5 (out of uite high resting”, ning two ork” and rk”, with indicate u (2009), dents as ndicators graduate e going”, for these three in by the a students similar mean sc good te students students very we The an account indicato four ind were si which t students students The com differen 3.62 fro “Work h with a s enginee The com showed students best wo their wo Conseq is quite design o on the undergr of good importa On the the sub undergr differen motivat students ndicators con accounting s. These in perceptions cores also sh eaching ind s of 4.02 an s’ work”, G ell” indicato alysis of th ting and the ors were qu dicators co ignificantly the level o s were com s. mparison of nce, with a om the eng hard to mak score of 3.9 ering underg mparison o d quite large s of 3.89 an ork” and “M ork” indicat quently, thes e clear that of the cours ir progress raduate stud d teaching, ant but to a other side, bjects inter raduate stud nces obtaine te students a s. While acc nfirmed tha undergradu ndicate that s regarding how that th dicators, w nd 4.09, 4.0 Give helpful ors. he descripti e engineerin uite differen nfirmed tha different th f importanc mparatively f mean scor score of 3. gineering un ke their subj 97 from the graduate stu of mean sco e difference nd 2.83, and Make a real tors. se findings t both acco se, the lectu s, as the dents also co while engi slightly less accounting resting as dents consid ed from this and the lect counting un at there were uate student both accou the import ese three in with scores 08 and 4.05 l feedback o ive data sho ng undergra nt. The resu at the score han those g ce of these higher to res for the “ 99 from th ndergraduat bjects intere accounting udents. ores for the es, with sco d 3.82 and l effort to u can only pr ounting and urers’ comm most imp onsider the ineering un ser extent. g undergrad an import der this ind s study are turers’ effor ndergraduat 337 e no signifi ts and those unting and ance of the ndicators rec from acco 5, and 4.01 on how stud owed an in aduate stude ults of the c es given by given by th e indicators those perc “Explain th he accountin te students. esting” indic undergradu e two remai ores from ac 2.60, respe understand d rovide some d engineeri ments on the portant ind lecturers’ a ndergraduate duate studen tant indicat dicator only in the stude rts to under te students c Asian icant differe e given by t engineering ese three ind ceived the h ounting an and 4.11, r dents are go nitial indica ents for the comparison y the accou he engineeri perceived ceived by th hings very w ng undergra The comp cator showe uate student ining good ccounting a ctively for difficulties s e partial of ing undergr eir work, an icators of ability to exp e students a nts consider tor of goo as moderat ent percepti stand the di consider the n Journal of F ences betwe the enginee g undergrad dicators of g highest score nd engineer respectively oing”, and “ ation that th remaining n of the mea unting unde ing undergr by accoun he engineer well” indicat aduate stude arison of m ed a quite m ts and a sco teaching in and enginee “Motivate s students mi support for raduate stu nd feedback good teac plain as an also conside r the lecture od teaching tely importa ons on the ifficulties th ese two as im Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi een the scor ering underg duate studen good teachi es among th ring underg y for “Com “Design the he scores f four good t an scores f ergraduate raduate stud nting underg ring underg ator showed ents and a mean scores moderate dif ore of 3.28 f ndicators, h ering underg students to ight be hav P1. On one udents cons k from the l ching. Acc important i der this indi ers’ efforts g, but eng ant. The no lecturers’ e hat are face mportant in ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa es given graduate nts have ing. The he seven graduate ment on e course from the teaching for these students dents, in graduate graduate d a slight score of s for the fference, from the however, graduate do their ing with e side, it ider the lecturers counting ndicator icator as to make gineering oticeable efforts to d by the ndicators of good importa students apparen The ch enginee althoug matters subjects and hen seeming Table 3 Account (n =323) Mea Std d Minimu Maxim Enginee (n =205) Mea Std d Minimu Maxim T Sig Notes: * S d teaching, e ant. Appare s and to em ntly they do haracteristics ering discipl gh sharing s as the engi s and area w nce for acc gly are mor . Students’ Comm on stude wor ting ) an 4.0 dev 0.8 um 3 mum 5 ering ) an 4.0 dev 0.8 um 3 mum 5 -0.9 0.3 Significant at p engineering ently the en mpathize w o not contrib s of the di line is more some levels ineering dis which requi counting un re valuable a perceptions ment n ents’ rk Gi help feed on h stud are g 02 4. 85 0. 3 1 5 5 09 4. 84 1. 3 1 5 5 921 0.3 57 0.7 < 0.01 g undergradu ngineering s with the stud bute to the t isciplines m e technical a s of techni scipline. Ad ire discussio dergraduate and appreci s of good te ive pful back how dents going Mot stud to their wo 08 3 99 0 1 5 05 2 03 1 1 5 319 9.7 750 0.0 338 uate student students do dents’ situa transfer and may also c and precise ical feature dditionally, on and anal e students, iated. eaching by a Good Teach tivate dents o do r best ork Exp thi ve w .89 3. .99 0. 1 2 5 5 .83 3. .35 1. 1 2 5 5 719 4.0 000* 0.0 Asian ts consider not regard ation as imp d communic ontribute to in nature w s and preci parts of the ysis which motivationa area of study hing Indicato plain ngs ery ell Work to m th sub inter 99 3. 87 0. 2 5 62 3. 08 1. 2 5 083 7.5 00* 0.0 n Journal of F these two in d lecturers’ portant to t cation of ski o these res while the acc ision, is no e accounting are more qu al supports y ors k hard make heir jects esting M un d stud be h th .97 .92 2 5 .28 .07 1 5 598 000* Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi ndicators as efforts to m their learnin ills and kno sults, in wh counting di ot as firm i g discipline ualitative in from the l Make a real effort to nderstand difficulties dents might having with heir work 3.82 1.02 1 5 2.60 1.38 1 5 10.867 0.000* ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa s not too motivate ng since owledge. hich the scipline, in those involve n nature, lecturers Design the course very well 4.01 0.92 1 5 4.11 0.88 1 5 -1.239 0.216 4.3 Stud The me compar from th in all g “Give h of the m only in students students difficult suggest some ra women tendenc expect m In gene overall provide female indicato dents’ perce eans of the red to their he descriptiv good teachin helpful feed mean scores ndicator tha s, in which s was com t to make tions regard ationalizatio are suppos cy that ma more feedba eral, we cou good teach e a reasona and male un ors of good eptions of g e scores on male coun ve statistics ng scales w dback on ho s confirmed at was sign the level o mparatively a presumpt ding the dif on about thi sed to be mo ale undergra ack provide uld make a hing scores able level o ndergraduat teaching. good teachin n good tea nterparts’ sc showed tha were similar w students that “Give nificantly d f importanc higher to t tion on wh fferences b s. It is said ore modest aduate stud ed by their l conclusion of the fema of support f te students h 339 ng by gende aching scale cores are sh at the score r to those o are going” helpful feed different be ce of this in that perceiv hat factors a etween ma that men ar and tender. dents, comp lecturers. n that there ale and mal for P2, and have simila Asian er es of fema hown in Ta es made by of their mal ” indicator. dback on ho etween fem ndicator per ved by thei affect this sculine and re supposed . Hence, as paratively were no si le undergrad d hence can ar perception n Journal of F ale undergr able 4. The female unde le counterpa The results ow students male and m rceived by m r female co difference. d feminine d to be asser a conseque to their fe ignificant d duate stude n provide s ns regarding Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi raduate stud e initial ind dergraduate arts, except s of the com are going” male underg male underg ounterparts Hofstede’s traits may rtive and tou ence there m emale coun differences b ents. These some eviden g the impor ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa dents as dications students t for the mparison was the graduate graduate . It was s (2001) provide ugh, and may be a nterparts, between findings nce that rtance of Table 4 Females (n =280) Mean Std de Minimu Maximu Males (n =248) Mean Std de Minimu Maximu t Sig Notes: * S 4.4 Stud The me year of The init undergr undergr The res their be second perceiv by the s The des year un 4. Students’ Comme on student work s ) n 4.10 ev 0.85 um 3 um 5 ) n 4.00 ev 0.83 um 3 um 5 1.320 0.187 Significant at p dents’ perce eans of the study are sh tial indicatio raduate stud raduate stud sults of the est work” w year unde ed by the fi second year scriptive sta ndergraduate perceptions ent ts’ k Giv helpf feedba on ho stude are go 3.88 1.08 1 5 4.23 0.90 1 5 0 -3.95 7 0.000 < 0.01 eptions of g scores on hown in Tab ons from th dents in al dents, excep compariso was the only ergraduate s irst year und r undergradu atistics and e students s s of good te G e ful ack ow nts oing Motiv stude to do t best w 8 3.5 8 1.2 1 5 3 3.4 0 1.2 1 5 53 0.85 0* 0.39 good teachin good teach bles 5a to 5 he descriptiv l good teac pt for the “ n of the m indicator th students, in dergraduate uate student d the compa showed that 340 eaching by g Good Teachi vate ents their work Expl thin ver wel 53 3.8 23 1.0 2 5 5 44 3.8 27 0.9 2 5 5 51 -0.7 95 0.45 ng by year o hing scales o 5c. ve statistics ching scale “Motivate s mean scores hat was sign n which th e students w ts (see Tabl arison of th t there were Asian gender ing Indicato ain ngs ry ll Work to m the subj intere 81 3.6 00 0.9 1 5 88 3.7 95 1.0 1 5 54 -1.0 51 0.3 of study of undergra showed tha es were sim students to confirmed nificantly d he level of was compara le 5a). he mean sco e no signific n Journal of F rs hard make eir ects esting Ma e un di stud be h th 65 99 5 74 07 5 037 00 aduate stude at the scores milar to tho do their be that “Motiv different bet importance atively high ores for sec cant differe Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi ake a real effort to nderstand ifficulties dents might having with heir work 3.28 1.33 1 5 3.40 1.29 1 5 -1.063 0.288 ents based s made by f ose of seco est work” in vate studen tween first y e of this i her to that pe cond year a ences betwe ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa Design the course very well 4.00 0.96 1 5 4.09 0.85 2 5 -1.128 0.260 on their first year ond year ndicator. nts to do year and ndicator erceived and third een good teaching Howeve undergr undergr indicato students students (see Tab A poss relative some ch consequ results perceiv study. In gene overall students some ev of indic g scores of er, the ana raduate stu raduate stud or that was s. The level s was comp ble 5c). ible explan ely younger hallenges in uently they indicated t ed as less eral, we cou good teach s. These fin vidence that cators of goo f the secon alysis and c udents show dents, in w s significan l of importa paratively h nation of th students w n dealing w may need that this “M important o uld make a hing scores ndings prov t undergrad od teaching nd year and comparison wed similar which “Moti ntly differen ance of this igher to tha his differenc who most ha with a new more assu Motivate stu once the stu conclusion s of the fir ide a reason duate studen g irrespectiv 341 d third year s of the sc r results to ivate studen nt between s indicator p at perceived ce was tha ad just com environme urance and udents to d udents reac n that there rst year, se nable level nts have sim ve of their y Asian r undergrad cores made o those of nts to do th first year perceived b d by the thir t first year mpleted their ent and a n encouragem do their be ch the secon were no si cond year of support milar percept ear of study n Journal of F duate stude by first y f first year heir best w and third y by the first y rd year unde undergradu r high scho new univers ment from t est work” i nd or third ignificant d and third y for P3, and tions regard y. Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi ents (see ta year and th r and seco work” was t year underg year underg dergraduate duate studen ools and mi sity culture. their lecture indicator w year level differences b year underg d hence can ding the imp ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa able 5b). ird year nd year the only graduate graduate students nts were ght face . Hence, ers. The would be in their between graduate provide portance Table 5 and sec First yea (n =247) Mean Std de Minimu Maximu Second year (n =166) Mean Std de Minimu Maximu t sig Notes: * S 5a. Students ond year stu Comme on studen work ar ) n 4.05 ev 0.84 um 3 um 5 ) n 4.11 ev 0.81 um 3 um 5 -0.72 0.472 Significant at p ’ perception udents) ent ts’ k Giv helpf feedba on ho stude are go 4.10 0.98 1 5 4.06 1.00 1 5 1 0.41 2 0.67 < 0.01 ns of good t G ve ful ack ow nts oing Motiv stude to do best w 0 3.7 8 1.1 1 5 6 3.3 0 1.2 1 5 15 2.82 78 0.00 342 teaching by Good Teachi ivate ents their work Expl thin ver we 71 3.8 15 0.9 1 2 5 5 37 3.8 26 0.9 1 2 5 5 21 -0.1 05* 0.89 Asian y year of stu ing Indicato lain ngs ry ll Work to m the subj intere 5 3.7 7 0.9 2 5 7 3.6 8 1.0 1 5 36 1.2 92 0.1 n Journal of F udy (compar ors hard make eir ects esting Ma e un di stud be h th 74 98 2 5 61 09 1 5 97 96 Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi risons betw ake a real effort to nderstand ifficulties dents might having with heir work 3.39 1.29 1 5 3.37 1.31 1 5 0.147 0.883 ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa ween first Design the course very well 4.05 0.92 1 5 4.05 0.83 2 5 -0.063 0.950 Table 5 second Second year (n =166) Mean Std de Minimum Maximu Third year (n =115) Mean Std de Minimu Maximu t sig Notes: * S 5b. Students and third ye Comme on student work ) n 4.11 ev 0.81 m 3 um 5 ) n 3.95 ev 0.89 um 3 um 5 1.546 0.123 Significant at p s’ perception ear students ent ts’ k Giv helpf feedba on ho stude are go 4.06 1.00 1 5 4.00 9 1.08 1 5 6 0.48 3 0.63 < 0.01 ns of good t s) G ve ful ack ow nts oing Motiv studen do th best w 6 3.3 0 1.2 1 5 0 3.1 8 1.3 1 5 81 1.4 31 0.1 343 teaching by Good Teachi ivate nts to heir work Exp thi very 37 3. 26 0. 1 2 5 15 3. 35 0. 1 2 5 31 0.4 54 0.6 Asian y year of stu ing Indicato plain ings y well W ha mak sub inte .87 3 .98 1 2 5 .81 3 .99 1 2 5 493 -0 622 0 n Journal of F dy (compar rs Work ard to ke their bjects resting M rea und dif st m h wi 3.61 1.09 1 5 3.73 1.07 2 5 0.927 .355 0 Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi risons betwe Make a al effort to derstand fficulties tudents might be having ith their work D v 3.37 1.31 1 5 3.21 1.34 1 5 1.025 0.306 ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa een Design the course very well 4.05 0.83 2 5 4.05 0.96 1 5 0.018 0.985 Table 5 and thir First yea (n =247) Mean Std de Minimu Maximu Third year (n =115) Mean Std de Minimum Maximu t sig Notes: * S 5c. Students rd year stud Comme on student work ar ) n 4.05 ev 0.84 um 3 um 5 ) n 3.95 ev 0.89 m 3 um 5 1.044 0.297 Significant at p ’ perception dents) ent ts’ k Giv helpf feedba on ho stude are go 4.10 0.98 1 5 4.00 9 1.08 1 5 4 0.88 7 0.37 < 0.01 ns of good t G ve ful ack ow nts oing Motiv studen do th best w 0 3.7 8 1.1 1 5 0 3.1 8 1.3 1 5 86 3.8 76 0.00 344 teaching by Good Teachi ivate nts to heir work Exp thi very 71 3. 15 0. 1 2 5 15 3. 35 0. 1 2 5 71 0.4 00* 0.6 Asian year of stud ing Indicato plain ings y well W ha mak sub inte .85 3 .97 0 2 5 .81 3 .99 1 2 5 414 0 679 0 n Journal of F dy (compar rs Work ard to ke their bjects resting M rea und dif st m h wi 3.74 0.98 2 5 3.73 1.07 2 5 .123 .902 0 Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi risons betwe Make a al effort to derstand fficulties tudents might be having ith their work D v 3.39 1.29 1 5 3.21 1.34 1 5 1.246 0.213 ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa een first Design the course very well 4.05 0.92 1 5 4.05 0.96 1 5 -0.034 0.973 5. Conc The ove seven o undergr commen importa students teaching undergr lecturer difficult three at Finally, indicato The res wishing noted t opportu with the learned evidenc the stud indicato students Referen Botas, educatio Blackm evaluati http://dx Crumbl of co http://dx Emery, student http://dx Feldma Higher clusions erall results of the goo raduate stu nts on thei ant indicato s also feel g, but its i raduate stu rs’ efforts to ties that are ttributes as i , overall, un ors of good sults of this g to improv that as mu unity for the e unique ch and appli ce that the g dents, and h ors for stud s. nces P.C.P. (20 on case. Hig more, J. (20 ing teachin x.doi.org/10 ley, L., Hen ollege te x.doi.org/10 C.R., Kram evaluations x.doi.org/10 an, K.A. (19 Education, s of this stu od teaching udents are ir work, an ors of good that the le importance udents. The o make the e faced by t important, b ndergraduat teaching irr s study hav ve the qualit ch as we e lecturers to haracteristic ied from th good teachin hence prov dent evaluat 08). Studen gher Educa 009). Acade ng and what 0.1080/0307 nry, B.K. & eaching. 0.1108/EUM mer, T.R., an s of teachin 0.1108/0968 976). The s 5, 243-288 udy suggest g indicators in agreeme d feedback d teaching. ecturers’ ab is emphas obvious d subjects int the students but not so in te students h respective o ve some im ty of teachin know that o foster the cs of certain he students ng scales us ides some l tion could nts’ percep ation Review emic pedag t students w 7507090289 Kratchman Quality M00000000 nd Tian, R.G ng effective 8488031046 superior co 8. http://dx.d 345 that in gen s as impor ent that th k from the . Both acc bility to ex ized to a s differences nteresting, to s. Accounti n the eyes o have simila of their gend mplications f ng and lear what stud creation of n subjects, t s’ perspecti sed in this s level of ass offer mutu ptions of qu w, 40(3), 50 ogies, qual want. Studie 98664 n, S.H. (2001 Assurance 006158 G. (2003). R eness. Quali 62074 ollege teach doi.org/10.1 Asian neral underg rtant. Both he design o lecturers on counting an xplain is an slightly big are in the o motivate s ng undergr of the engin r perception der or year o for account rning for the ents want f learning an there are alw ives. Secon study are ov surance tha ual benefits uality teach -68. lity logics a es in Highe 1). Students in Ed Return to ac ity Assuranc her from the 1007/BF009 n Journal of F graduate stu accounting of the cou n their pro nd engineer n important gger extent e student p students and aduate stud eering unde ns regarding of study. ting and en eir students does not a nd does not ways good nd, this stu verall consi at the imple to both the hing in the and perform er Educatio s’ perception ducation, ademic stan ce in Educa e students’ 991967 Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi udents perce g and eng urse, the le ogress are t ring underg t indicator by the acc perceptions d to unders dents consid ergraduate s g the impor ngineering l s. First, it sh always cap t always cor lessons tha udy provide idered impo ementation e lecturers e UK: The mative univ on, 34(8), 8 ns of the ev 9(4), 1 ndards: a cr ation, 11(1) view. Rese ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa eived all gineering ecturers’ he most graduate of good counting on the stand the der these students. rtance of lecturers hould be ture the rrespond at can be es some ortant by of these and the MA in versities: 857-872. valuation 197-207. itique of ), 37-46. earch in Fuhrma graduat Faculty Goodw percept http://dx Graduat Careers Hativa, Interna http://dx Holmes percept Educati Hofsted organiz Kember a funct self-det http://dx Kember a funct teaching http://dx Mitsis, experien http://dx Surrat, process http://dx Tootoon teaching and Ma Vieira, in High Xiao, Z Accoun an, N.E., Fu te level: are y Developme in, L.D. & S ions of “ x.doi.org/10 te Careers A s Australia L N. (1984). tional Journ x.doi.org/10 s, K. & Pap ions and u ion, 8(1), 85 de, G. (2001 zations acro r, D., Jenkin tion of the termination. x.doi.org/10 r, D., Jenkin tion of thei g. Stu x.doi.org/10 A. & Fo nce percept x.doi.org/10 C.K. & Des s. Americ x.doi.org/10 nchi, A., L g methodol anagement, F. (2002). P her Educatio Z. & Dyson nting Educat uhrman, R. we meetin ent, 24(2), 1 Stevens, E.A “good” te 0.2307/2960 Australia (2 Ltd. . Good teac nal of Math 0.1080/0020 pageorgiou, uses of fe 5-96. http:// 1). Culture’ oss nations. ns, W., & N eir concept . Studie 0.1080/0158 ns, W. & N ir conceptio udies 0.1080/1580 oley, P. (2 tion. Intern 0.1108/095 sselle, S.P. can Jou 0.5688/aj71 Lyons, P., & logies and 12(1), 79-9 Pedagogic q on, 8(3), 25 n, J.R. (1999 tion, 8(4), 3 .G. & DeL g the instru 19-24. A. (1993). T aching. Jo 0028 2011). Grad ching of m hematical Ed 0739840150 G. (2009). edback. Jo /dx.doi.org/ ’s consequen Thousand O Ng, K.C. (20 ions of lea es in 8037032000 Ng, K.C. (20 ons of lear in Co 037042000 2009). Cult national Jou 1354091098 (2007). Pha urnal of 0106 & Hagen, A instructor c 3. http://dx quality at un 5-272. http: 9). Chinese 341-361. htt 346 Lay, A.M. ( uctional exp The influenc ournal of duate Cours mathematics ducation in 0508 . Good, bad ournal of H /10.3794/joh nces: Comp Oaks, Califo 003). Adult arning – p Continuin 0131556 004). Adult rning – par ontinuing 199461 turally-anch urnal of Ed 81023 armacy stud Pharma A. (2002). characterist .doi.org/10. niversities: ://dx.doi.org e students’ p tp://dx.doi.o Asian (2010). Def pectations of ce of gender Higher E se Experienc as perceive Science an d and insuff Hospitality, hlste.81.183 paring value fornia: Sage students’ p part 1. Infl ng Educ students’ p rt 2. Impli Educa hored valu ducational M dents’ percep aceutical MBA stud tics. Interna .1108/eb047 what teache g/10.1080/1 perceptions org/10.1080 n Journal of F fining “goo f doctoral st on universi Education, ce 2010. M ed by unde d Technolo ficient: stud , Leisure, 3 es, behavior Publication erceptions o luencing th cation, 2 erceptions o cations for tion, es and un Managemen ptions of a t Education ents’ perce ational Jou 7438 ers and stud 1353832022 of good ac 0/096392899 Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2012, Vol. www.macrothi od teaching tudents? Jo ity faculty m 64(2), 1 Melbourne: G ergraduate s ogy, 15(5), 6 dents’ expec Sport & rs, institutio ns, Inc. of good tea he developm 25(2), 2 of good tea r the evalu 26(1), niversity ed nt, 23(6), 4 teaching ev n, 71(1), eptions of e urnal of Co dents think. 2000031647 ccounting te 9330838 ccounting 946-052X 4, No. 2 ink.org/ajfa g” at the ournal of members’ 166-185. Graduate students. 605-615. ctations, Tourism ons, and ching as ment of 239-251. ching as ation of 81-97. ducation 484-504. valuation 1-7. effective ommerce Quality 7 eaching.