Microsoft Word - 2629-10240-1-RV-writer2-new M f Receive doi:10.5 Abstra Nowada Design improvi should be appl has bee systems studyin evaluati checkin Golesta question was app were p informa index an Keywo Measurin from Us Depar PO Bo T De ed: Nov. 4, 5296/ajfa.v5 ct ays Informa and deploy ing organiz be evaluate icable and a en suggeste s in the fie g Task/Syst ing achieve ng informat an province nnaire with plication an erformed u ation system nd Research rds: Inform ng the S sers’ Po P rtment of M ox: 49417-9 Tel: 98-371- epartment o Islam 2012 A 5i1.2629 ation system yment of in zational an ed. For effe acceptable b ed by Goo eld of quan tem fit (TSF ement of th tion system e, Iran du changes in nd the execu using regres ms in Khat h hypothese mation, Syste Success oint of arviz Saeidi Management 93451, Islam -0735 E- Azin of Public Ad mic Azad Un ccepted: De URL: h ms play a d nformation nd individu ective functi by employe dhue as an ntitative inf F), individu he system. m achievem uring 1389 n environme utive metho ssion and E tamol-Anbi es were con em, Informa 21 s of Inf View U di (Correspon t and Accou mic Azad Un -mail: Dr.pa n Malek Ma dministratio niversity, Al ecember 27 http://dx.doi decisive role systems an ual perform ion of the o ees. Users’ a n indicator formation in ual abilities This resea ments in K 9.The meth ental conditi od was desc Eviews6 an ia hospital nfirmed. ation system Asian formati Using G nding autho unting, Aliab niversity, A arvizsaeedi@ rzban on, Aliabad iabad katou , 2012 P i.org/10.529 e in success nd costly te mance. The organization assessment to measur n manageri and system arch assess Khatamol-A hod of da ions. The ai criptive – c nd Excel s were succ m, Work/sys n Journal of F on Sys Goodhu or) bad katoul B liabad katou @yahoo.com katoul Bran ul, Iran Published: J 96/ajfa.v5i1 s or failure echnology i success of n, informati model abou e the succe ial decision m characteris sed the use Anbia hospi ata collecti im of this fi orrelation. T oftware. Re essful acco stem propor Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2013, Vol. www.macrothi stems (I ue Inde Branch ul, Iran m nch June 1, 2013 .2629 of an organ investments f such inve ion systems ut Task / Sy ess of info ns. The pur stics and po ers’ evaluat ital in Gon ing was G field- study r The statisti esults show ording to G rtion ccounting 946-052X 5, No. 1 ink.org/ajfa IS) x 3 nization. s aim at estments s should ystem fit ormation rpose of olicies is tion and nbad in Goodhue research ical tests wed that Goodhue 1. Intro Accord kinds of (IS) is m useful i importa Hospita network admissi requests scientif Khatam From a collectin making informa procedu informa transmi studies assess t points o network The ma spendin 1986). Many re operatio & Torkz Task/Sy people a Chara Sy U oduction ing to the in f informatio manifested. information ance. al managem k of works ion till disc s of medica fic- researc mol-Anbia‘s a technical ng, process g and contr ation system ures, data, s ation (Jorda itting, retrie on manage the mention of view, inf king trends, ain objectiv ng program esearchers h on and perfo zadeh, 1991 Figure 1 ystem fit is accomplish acteristics: ystems User Task ncreasing ro on in order t . Evaluating n system th ment inform stations an charge. This al and clinic ch activiti informatio perspective sing, storing rol. Any ac m. Each info oftware, ha an & Mach eving, stori ment inform ned system. formation s , value and u ves of info ms and crea have expres formance in 1). 1. shown an an extent their tasks Us ole of inform to continue g the role o hat can lead ation system d covers a s automated cal affairs a ies.(Arash,1 n system ha e, informati g and distri ctivity whi ormation sys ardware. Pro esky, 1990, ing, proces mation syste Member as atisfaction, utility for u ormation sy ating value ssed the rela a linear des n example o to which a Or is the pro ser‘s evaluati the system 22 mation in o their activit of this infor d to organi m has been all related d system is as well as pe 1388,p233). as been eval ion system ibuting info ich is done stem is com ocedures dic , p3). Infor ssing and d ems literatu ssessments a valuing th users, etc( G ystems (IS) by improv ationship be sign which of a link betw an informat oportion tha ion of m Asian rganization ties, the imp rmation in zations’ pro n activated o operational s capable o erforming a .in this r luated from is a contin ormation to e by the c mposed of fiv ctate to peo rmation syst display of ure (MIS) w are discusse e managem Goodhue,199 ) are polic ving perfor etween featu is shown in ween system ion system at exists wit Sy app n Journal of F s and their n portance of organization ogress and over night a l process s f respondin all administr research th m users ‘poin nuous syste assist orga computer is ve elements ple how to tems are m information want users as ed under va ment informa 92,p311). ies, organiz rmance (Cr ures / polici n figure 1(D ms and perfo or system thin the wor ystem lication Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2013, Vol. www.macrothi needs to ha information ons and ach developme and day in since the p ng to all ne rative-finan he prospe nt of view. em that de anization’s s called sy s that includ transform d means for re n. Many em s a success arious titles, mation system zational str rowston & ies, evaluati Davis, 1989 formance m environm rk requisites Per i ccounting 946-052X 5, No. 1 ink.org/ajfa ave these n system ieving a ent is of massive patient’s eeds and ncial and erity of als with decision ystem or e people, data into eceiving, mpirical index to , such as ms, data ructures, Treacy, ion, user , & Doll ent help s and the formance impact role of ( Goodhu requirem He belie fit wou evaluati Criteria 1-Featu on syste 2. Liter Fichbei believed the basi as his su Baily & this resu informa Rogers his rese five fea Compat Daivis i two fac percept technol Goodhu thirty-fi these st usefuln system Goodhu and task and tim 3. Mate Aim of consiste someho able to c (MIS) envir ue believes ments and in eved that th uld make a ion the syst a used in 35 ures / System ems 5-Pe rature Revi in & Ajzen d that how t is of his atti ubjective no & Pearson in ult that user ation. in 1995 dir earch he fou atures were: tibility. in 1989 don tors play a ion of use ogy. ue in 1992 s ive research tudies emph ess the syst features, wh ue & Thomp ks. Facilitie meliness hav erials and M f this resea ed of all em ow associate cooperate in ronment (G that most ndividual ne he success o closer relat tem by the u 5 studies fo m Policies 2 rformance e iew in 1975 Co to deal with itude and al orm. n 1983 cond r job satisfa rected a rese und five inno Comparati ne a research key role in fulness of tudied user h in the field hasized on tems, and o hile many o pson in 199 es in using ve impact on Methods arch is app mployees, de ed with info n collecting oodhue, 19 of user as eeds unclea of the system tionship wit user should ocused on t 2-Task/Syste effects onducted re h technology lso suggests ducted a stu action is an earch on acc ovative char ve advantag h on user ac the accepta the techno evaluation d of informa sufficient i opinions of of them exis 95 and 1998 software an n the approp plication an epartment o ormation sys data related 23 88). ssessments ar. That resu m according th task perf focus on th the five foll em fit 3-E esearch on y is a kind o s that person udy under th important f ceptance and racteristics t ge, Comple cceptance of ance of info ology and t of informat ation system information the users. M st in users’ m 8 conducted nd hardwar priateness o nd it is a c officials and stems in Kh d to hospita Asian have made lts in more u g to user eva formance an he Task/Syst lowing stru Expected co the theory of behavior n behavior d he user's ove factor whic d innovation that influen exity, observ f informatio rmation tec the second tion systems ms managem n, understan Many of the minds. Studies as A re, Compati f technolog correlated s d hospital ad hatamol-Anb l informatio n Journal of F e the distin uncertainty aluation bas nd the resea temfit. ucture (Good onsequences of rational . Person beh depends on erall satisfac h is in relat n of informa nce the selec vable, Possib on technolog hnology. one is fac s. Classifica ment were re nding of in em are obje Appropriate bility, Acce y and tasks survey. The dministrator bia Social se on systems. Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2013, Vol. www.macrothi nction betw with perfor sed on Task archers' cri dhue, 1992 s of use 4 performanc havior is fo n his attitude ction. They tion with th ation techno ction proces ibility of tes gy. He decla First is indi acility in us ation criteria eviewed by nformation s ective and r eness of tec essibility, A . e study po rs whose jo ecurity hosp Number of ccounting 946-052X 5, No. 1 ink.org/ajfa ween job rmances. k/System teria for 2, p308). 4-Impact ce. They rmed on e as well came to he use of ology. In ss. These sting and ared that ividual’s sing the a used in him. All systems, real, like chnology Accuracy pulation obs were pital and f persons, accordin question was don respond answer used in was use system question coeffici Task/Sy respecti 4. Conc One of model suggest field of Task/Sy (1995), systems objectiv informa have a c ng to the nnaire. Nee ne. Given th dents inform the main qu this study ed. Experts stats were u nnaire, Cro ient for the q ystem fit, in ively. ceptual Mo f the assessm was presen ted this mod f quantitativ ystem point as a conce s in the fiel ve was to m ation system close relatio preliminar eded inform hat this rese mation on th uestions of to measure and users o used. To de onbach's alp questionnai ndividual ab odel ment metho nted by Go del as a cri ve informatio of view wa eptual basis ld of using measure user ms (MIS) me onship with S ry investig ation collec earch study heir educatio the question the success of the system etermine the pha coeffic res was 0.7 ilities and F ods to asse oodhue (Go terion for m on in manag as provided which aim recorded in s' opinions a eet users' bu job perform Figure 2. Work Individu ystem po 24 gation is o cted by this is based on on, occupat nnaire Like s of inform ms, includin e coefficient cient was c 8. Cronbach Features of t ss Task/Sys oodhue1992 measuring t gerial decis by Goodhu ms at evaluat nformation and comme usiness need mance. He p . presented h k ual licy Asian one hundre questionna n Goodhue tion, age, se ert continuum ation system ng a comput t of reliabili alculated. T h's alpha co the system p stem fit is 2). He wa the success ion. ue (1992, 19 ting user in for manage ents. He wan ds. He believ presented hi his model n Journal of F ed. Data co ire and then index, the q ex, years of m is used. G ms, So Goo ter supervis ity and valid The overall efficients fo policy were users’ evalu s an Amer of informat 998) and Go order to m ers and dec nted to know ved that the is model as Task / Sy Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2013, Vol. www.macrothi ollection to n statistical questionnair f service. In Goodhue in odhue quest sor and an e dity of ques l Cronbach or subscales 0.76, 0.73 a uation mod rican scien ation system oodhue - Th measure info cision maki w how mana Task/system follows: ystem fit ccounting 946-052X 5, No. 1 ink.org/ajfa ool is a analysis re asked order to ndex was tionnaire expert of stions in h's alpha s such as and 0.84 del. This ntist that ms in the hompson ormation ing. His agement m fit can In this m task th multidim 4.1 Met In order coeffici of class estimate beta we question Feature step by 5. Resu 5.1 Test H0: hos H1: hos Table 1 Dependen Method: L Included o Variable C SER04 SER05 SER07 SER08 SER09 SER10 R-squared Adjusted R F-statistic Prob (F-st Substitut (SER01+S *SER10 model Task hat would mensional e thods of ana r to analyze ients and F sical linear r ed optimal ere estimate ns were en es of the sy step and an ults t the first hy spital inform spital inform . Results of nt Variable: (SE Least Square observation: 88 d R-square tatistic) ted Coefficients SER02+SER03 k / System f be adjust evaluation o alysis e data, infer -statistic fo regression m conditions. ed. The firs ntered into stem policy n appropriat ypothesis mation syste mation syste f Task/Syste R01+SER02+S Coeffici 2.01152 0.197445 -0.10915 0.19796 0.14802 0.12002 0.15701 0.422923 0.380177 9.893773 0.000000 s: )=2.0115+0.19 fit (TSF) ca ted with i of the system rential test l r significan model, Ord . In this me t step in ex regression y. After vie te model wa ems (IS) bas ems (IS) bas em fit SER03) ient 4 5 54 62 29 24 13 3 74*SER04-0.10 25 an be sough individual’s m or system like correlat nt regression dinary least ethod by mi xamining th based on ewing the re as created. sed on Task sed on Task Std.Error 0.413231 0.082345 0.059647 0.08496 0.07110 0.08575 0.06231 Mea S.D.depen Dur 091*SER05+0. Asian ht in the cha s abilities. m environme tion was use n was used. squares (OL inimizing th he issue, var Task/System esults, regre k/System fit k/System fit 5 7 66 5 5 4 an dependent va ndent var rbin-Watson sta .1979*SER07-0 n Journal of F aracteristics In fact, ent can be p ed. T-test fo According LS) regress he square e riables in in m fit, indiv ession impr are success are not suc t-Statisti 4.86779 2.3977 -1.8299 2.329 2.081 1.3996 2.5197 ar 0 at 0.1480*SER08+ Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2013, Vol. www.macrothi s of the sys with this possible. or partial re g to the assu sion method error, the al nformation vidual abili rovement w sful. ccessful. tic 92 0 787 994 0 9893 822 606 0 721 3.746212 0.643256 1.987347 +0.1200*SER0 ccounting 946-052X 5, No. 1 ink.org/ajfa tem and model, gression umptions d has the lpha and systems ties and was done Prob. 0.0000 0.0188 0.0709 0.0223 0.0405 0.1654 0.0137 09+0.1570 Accord prob. (F regressi Because approve with 99 of hosp 5.2 Test H0: hos H1: hos Table 2 Dependen Method: L Included o Variable C SER16 SER18 SER19 SER21 SER33 EDUCAT R-squared Adjusted R S.E. of reg Sum squar Log likelih F-statistic Prob (F-st (SER11+S 0.8962+0. Accord validity closer v confide ing to Tabl F-statistic) a ion. e the Prob. ed through t 9% confiden ital informa t the second spital inform spital inform . Results of nt Variable: (SE Least Square observation: 81 C d R-square gression red resid hood tatistic) SER12) .0979*SER16-. ing to the re y of the mo value to ze ence level t e (1) the ov and the gre . (F-statistic the Watson- nce level tha ation system d hypothesis mation syste mation syste f individual R11+SER12) / after adjustmen Coefficient 0.896296 0.097939 -0.112064 0.391757 0.186670 0.23367 0.258180 0.346704 0.293734 0.623823 28.79744 -73.05044 6.5453 0.000014 1120*SER18+0 egression te del is appro ero, the mor that H0 is verall result eater tenden c) is equal -Durbin stat at H0 is reje m is approve s ems (IS) bas ems (IS) bas capabilities 2 nts Std.Err 77 4 301 0.3917*SER19 st and signi oved by pro re reliable rejected a 26 ts and the v ncy toward to zero an tistic test wh ected and H ed. sed on indiv sed on indiv s ror 0.677047 0.103750 0.052013 0.099699 0.085258 0.144732 0.190182 Mea S.D.depen Akaike inf Schwarz cr Hannan-Q Durb 9+0.18667*SER ificant coeff ob. (F-statis the model and H1 is Asian validity of th zero the m nd the Lack hich was equ H1 is accepte vidual capab vidual capab t-Statistic an dependent va ndent var fo criterion riterion Quinn criter. in-Watson stat R21+0.2336774 ficients in ta stic) = 0.00 will be. So accepted. T n Journal of F he model a ore signific k of correla ual to 1.98, ed. In other bilities are n bilities are s Prob. 1.323831 0.943990 -2.154522 3.929413 2.189467 1.614548 1.357540 ar 0 1.97 2.1 2.0 2034*SER33+0 able (2), Ov 0014, it me o we can c Thus succe Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2013, Vol. www.macrothi are characte cantly appro ation probl so we can c r words, the not successf successful. 0.18 0 0. 0.03 3 0. 7 0. 0. 0.1 3.672840 0.742296 76554 183482 059576 2.267119 +0.2581*EDUC verall results eans that th conclude w ess of the ccounting 946-052X 5, No. 1 ink.org/ajfa rized by oved the lem was conclude e success ful. 896 3482 345 0002 0317 1107 787 2= AT s and the he more ith 99% hospital informa 5.3 Test H0: ho success H1: ho success Table 3 Dependen Method: L Date: 09/0 Sample (a Included o Convergen Variable C SER26 SER28 SER29 SER31 SER32 AR (1) R-squared Adjusted R S.E. of reg Sum squar Log likelih F-statistic Prob (F-st Inverted (SER22+S = 0.1960] Accord the mod level th system ation system t the third hy spital infor sful. ospital info sful. . Shows Re nt Variable: (SE Least Square 07/00 Time: 03: adjusted): 2 88 observations: 87 nce achieved af d R-square gression red resid hood tatistic) d AR Roots SER23+SER24 ing to the re del is appro at H0 is reje is approved ms (IS) hypo ypothesis rmation sys ormation sy esults of sys R22+SER23+S :14 7 after adjustme fter 9 iterations Coefficie 0.124913 0.135291 0.315044 0.240088 0.227228 0.095486 0.202454 0.533417 0.498423 0.587017 27.56716 -73.45384 15.24319 0.000000 .20 4) = 0.1483*SER egression te oved by prob ected and H d.Thus succ othesis base stems (IS) b ystems (IS) tem feature SER24) / 3 ents ent 3 4 7 R26 + 0.3131*S est and signi b. (F-statisti H1 is accepte ess of the h 27 ed on indivi based on s ) based on es Std.Error 0.483755 0.089745 0.091018 0.105844 0.085010 0.063596 0.119195 Mean d S.D.depen Akaike inf Schwarz cr Hannan-Q Durbin-Wa SER28 + 0.249 ificant coeff ic) = 0.00, S ed. In other hospital info Asian dual ability ystem char n system c 5 dependent var dent var fo criterion riterion Quinn criter. Watson stat 6*SER29 + 0.2 fficients, Ov So we can c words, the s ormation sys n Journal of F is approved racteristics haracteristic t-Statistic 0.258215 1.507509 3.461336 2.268318 2.672970 1.501452 1.69850 1 2343*SER31 + verall results conclude wi success of h stems (IS) h Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2013, Vol. www.macrothi d. and policy cs and po c P 0 8 0 2 09 3.835249 0.828862 1.849514 2.047920 1.929406 1.972967 0.0990*SER32 s and the va ith 99% con hospital info hypothesis b ccounting 946-052X 5, No. 1 ink.org/ajfa are not licy are Prob. .7969 0.0356 0.0009 0.0260 0.0091 0.0372 0.0933 2 + [AR (1) alidity of nfidence ormation based on system The suc abilities hypothe 6. Conc The res success Goodhu showed success Ajzen c Informa This fin Doll & Finally, Goodhu directio Thomps Referen Arash, hospital Bailey, satisfac Chirs, E Doll, W Quarter Fichbei theory a Gallivan innovat informa Goodhu instrum http://dx Goodhu Proceed characterist ccess of inf s and System eses were co clusion sults showe sful. This fi ue (1988) & d that hospit s. This resul confirm the ation system nding is in o Torkzadeh , the existin ue index ha on with the son (1985). nces Rahman. ( ls in Iran. F j.E. Pearso ction. Manag Ed wards. (1 W. j., & Tork rly, 12(2), 2 in, M., & Aj and research n, M. J. (20 tions develo ation system ue, D. L. ( ment for use x.doi.org/10 ue, D. L. ( dings of th tics and pol formation s m character onfirmed. ed that hos finding is in & (1995), B tal informati lt is in line above. ms based on one directio (1988), Goo ng informati ave the nec e results of (1388). Ana First Nationa on. (1983). D gement Scie 1991). The e kzadeh. (19 259,276. jzen, I. (197 h. Bost on: A 001). Organ opment and ms, 32(3), 51 (1988). Dev er evaluatio 0.2307/2496 (1992). Us he Hawaii licy is appro ystems with ristics and p pital inform n one direc Billy & Pe ion systems e with many n system cha n with the r odhue & Th ion systems cessary suc f other rese alysis and al Conferen Developme ence, 29, 53 essence of i 988). The m 70). Belief, Addison-W nizational a d application 1-85. velopment a ons of infor 689 er evaluati internation 28 oved h the three policy was e mation syst ction with t arson (198 s (IS) based y researcher aracteristics results of ot hompson (1 s in hospita ccess. And earchers’ su evaluation nce on Softw ent of a tool 30-584. information measurement Attitude, In Wesley. adoption, an n of a new and measur rmation sys ions of MI nal conferen Asian component examined b tems (IS) b the results 3), Davis a on individu rs’ findings s and polici ther researc 995). ls from the the finding uch as Goo of manage ware Engine l measuring n system, 26 t of end use ntentions an nd assimilat framework rement vali stems. Deci IS success: nce and inf n Journal of F ts; Task/Sys y Goodhue based on Ta of other re and et.al. (1 ual abilities, . Studies do es have the hers’ such a perspective gs of this r odhue (1992 ement infor eering, Iran, g and analyz 6-27. Londo er computin nd Behavior tion of com k. The data idity of a t ision scienc what are nformation Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2013, Vol. www.macrothi stem fit, in e index and Task/System esearchers’ 1989). Also , have the ne done by Fich e necessary as Goodhue e of users b research are 2 and Goo rmation sys , (223-236) zing compu on prentice H ng satisfacti r: an introdu mplex techn base for a task techno ce, 29(1), 1 really mea system scie ccounting 946-052X 5, No. 1 ink.org/ajfa ndividual all three m fit, are such as o results ecessary hbein & success. e (1988), based on e in one odhue & stems in uter user Hall. ion. MIS uction to nological advances ology fit 105-138. asuring? ence, 4, 303-314 Goodhu science, Goodhu MIS Qu Rogers, Zaltman new yor 4. ue, D. L. (19 , 41(12), 18 ue, D. L., & uarterly, 19( , E. M. (199 n, G. Dunca rk, N.4. 995). Under 82-184. & Thompson (2), 213-236 95). Diffusio an,R., & Ho rstanding u n,R. L. (199 6. on of innova olbeck, J. ( 29 ser evaluati 95). Tark-te ations. 4Th E 1973). Inno Asian ions of infor echnology f Edition, the ovations and n Journal of F rmation sys fit and indiv free press, d organizati Finance & Ac ISSN 19 2013, Vol. www.macrothi stems. Mana vidual perfo Newyork, N tions. Wiley ccounting 946-052X 5, No. 1 ink.org/ajfa agement ormance. NY. y & sons