editorial28-7.pdf Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 28, Number 7, 2012 ISSN 1449-5554 (online) Contents Editorial 28(7): AJET review process outcomes: 2011 data ......................................................... iii-vi Tertiary sector Designing, developing and implementing a software tool for scenario based learning ............................................................................................................................. 1083-1102 Geoff Norton, Mathew Taylor, Terry Stewart, Greg Blackburn, Audrey Jinks, Bahareh Razdar, Paul Holmes and Enrique Marastoni The role of theory in learning technology evaluation research .......................................... 1103-1118 Rob Phillips, Gregor Kennedy and Carmel McNaught Towards motivation-based adaptation of difficulty in e-learning programs .................. 1119-1135 Anke Endler, Günter Daniel Rey and Martin V. Butz Self-efficacy and ICT integration into initial teacher education in Saudi Arabia: Matching policy with practice ................................................................................................ 1136-1151 Margaret Robertson and Abdulrahman Al-Zahrani Implementing online question generation to foster reading comprehension ................. 1152-1175 Hui-Chin Yeh and Pei-Yi Lai Blended learning and curriculum renewal across three medical schools: The rheumatology module at the University of Otago ....................................................... 1176-1189 Simon Stebbings, Nasser Bagheri, Kellie Perrie, Phil Blyth and Jenny McDonald Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model ....................... 1190-1207 Kung-Teck Wong, Timothy Teo and Sharon Russo Beyond lecture capture: What teaching staff want from web-based lecture technologies .................................................................................................................. 1208-1220 Lisa Germany Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university ............................................................................................................... 1221-1232 Christopher Irwin, Lauren Ball Ben Desbrow and Michael Leveritt Does the use of technology make a difference in the geometric cognitive growth of pre-service mathematics teachers? .................................................................................... 1233-1247 Gerrit Stols Pre-service physical education teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge, technology integration self-efficacy and instructional technology outcome expectations ............................................................................................................... 1248-1265 Kivanc Semiz and Mustafa Levent Ince The Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET) is a refereed research journal published 8 times per year by the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ascilite). AJET retired its printed version (ISSN 1449-3098) at the end of Volume 23, 2007, and from Volume 24, 2008, the journal is open access, online only (ISSN 1449-5554), and does not have paid subscriptions. ii Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2012, 28(7) © 2012 Authors retain copyright in their individual articles, whilst copyright in AJET as a compilation is retained by the publisher. Except for authors reproducing their own articles, no part of this journal may be reprinted or reproduced without permission. For further details, and for details on submission of manuscripts and open access to all issues of AJET published since the journal's foundation in 1985, please see http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ For inquiries concerning year 2011 submissions, and production, website and business matters, contact the Production Editor (retirement pending), Dr Roger Atkinson, 5/202 Coode Street, Como WA 6152, Australia. Email: rjatkinson@bigpond.com, Tel: +61 8 9367 1133. Desktop publishing (PDF versions) and HTML by Roger Atkinson. For inquiries concerning year 2012 submissions, the interim editorial team is Associate Professor Sue Bennett (University of Wollongong; sue_bennett@uow.edu.au), Associate Professor Barney Dalgarno (Charles Sturt University; bdalgarno@csu.edu.au) and Associate Professor Gregor Kennedy (University of Melbourne; gek@unimelb.edu.au), with ascilite Secretariat support from Mr Andre Colbert (colbert.andre@gmail.com). AJET is managed by a Committee comprising ASCILITE Executive nominees, the convenors or nominees from previous ascilite Conferences, and AJET's previous editors and current senior editorial staff (to be reconstituted in 2012-13). The current 2012 Management Committee members are: Dr Caroline Steel, The University of Queensland, ASCILITE President Dr Iain Doherty, The University of Hong Kong, ASCILITE Executive Professor Geoffrey Crisp, RMIT University, ASCILITE 2003 Convenor Dr Rob Phillips, Murdoch University, ASCILITE 2004 Convenor Professor Peter Goodyear, University of Sydney, ASCILITE 2006 Convenor Dr Dale Holt, Deakin University, ASCILITE 2008 Convenor Professor Ron Oliver, Edith Cowan University, AJET Editor 1997-2001 Assoc Prof Catherine McLoughlin (Editor - retirement pending), Australian Catholic Uni Dr Roger Atkinson (Production Editor - retirement pending) AJET's Editorial Board (see http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/about/editorial-board.html) reflects the journal's commitment to academic excellence in educational technology and related areas of research and professional practice, our vision of an international journal with an Australasian regional emphasis, and our origins as a professional and learned society publication. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education http://www.ascilite.org.au/ Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2012, 28(7) iii Editorial 28(7) AJET review process outcomes: 2011 data The last report on AJET's review process, published in AJET Editorial 27(4) [1], included data for 2011 until 31 July 2011. Table 1 below marks the near completion of review and publication processes for 2011 submissions. Table 1: Article review outcomes AJET 2003-2011 Year of receipt No. rec'd No. rejected editorially (c) No. reject ext review No. with- drawn (d) No. pending No. accept(e) No. publ- ished (f) % accep- ted (g) 2003 61 34 14 0 0 13 24 21.3% 2004 97 51 13 2 0 31 21 32.0% 2005 91 47 9 5 0 30 30 33.0% 2006 100 59 9 3 0 29 29 29.0% 2007 119 67 14 4 0 34 30 28.6% 2008 127 71 20 1 0 35 42 27.6% 2009 186 95 27 2 0 62 45 33.3% 2010 236 126 25 6 0 78 71 33.5% 2011(a) 389(b) 188 62 6 12(h) 121 86(i) 31.1% a. Data for 2011 in columns 2-8 is at 26 August 2012. b. Includes numbers received for four Special issues; details given in Table 2 below, including a note about two Special issues published in 2010. c. Some of the rejected articles may appear again as receivals later in the same year or in a subsequent year. The reasons for counting these instances as rejections are to enable a clearer cut off for each year's outcomes, and to align data collection with the editorial advice, used in a significant proportion of cases, 'Reject. Invite resubmission of a revised or expanded work for a new review process'. d. Withdrawn means withdrawn at the request of the authors. e. The number of articles accepted from a particular year's receivals does not correspond to the number published in each year (column 8), owing to time taken for review and revisions, and fluctuations in the speed of these processes. f. The number published in a calendar year. g. % accepted is calculated from column 2 (No. rec'd) and column 7 (No. accepted). In the case of 2011, the acceptance rate may be subject to a minor variation depending upon the outcomes for 12 reviews that are pending. h. Of the 12 pending, 6 were post-24 Dec 2011 submissions which were placed in the OJS submission system for a new editorial team to attend to. i. For 2012, the number of articles published was 73 at 27 August 2012, all being derived from 2011 submissions. The number of articles to be published during the remainder of 2012 from the last of the 2011 submissions and from 2012 submissions has not been determined. http://www.ascilite.org.au/index.php?p=conference iv Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2012, 28(7) Table 2: Article review outcomes AJET 2011 Type (b) No. rec'd No. rejectededitorially (c) No. reject ext review No. with- drawn (d) No. pending No. accept % accep- ted (e) Regular issue 311 170 40 4 12 85 27.3% Special issue 78 18 22 2 0 36 46.2% Total (a) 389(b) 188 62 6 12(h) 121 31.1% a. Data for 2011 in columns 2-7 is at 26 August 2012. b. Four Special issues were included in the 2011 numbers received. The Special issues were 27(5) and 27(8), published in 2011, and 28(3) and 28(6), published in 2012. In 2010 two special issues were published, 26(4) and 26(8). Special issue 26(8) was not included in the 2010 counts because it did not involve any editorial work, being a simple republication. Special issue 26(4) contributed 13 submissions, 3 rejected after external review, and 10 accepted (76.9%), to the 2010 counts, but as the numbers were relatively small, the count data has not been separated. c. See Notes for Table 1. d. See Notes for Table 1. e. All four Special issues reviewed in 2011 commenced the review process with submissions of extended abstracts as detailed in http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/about/special- issues/guidelines.html. Details on the numbers of extended abstracts received and the numbers of invitations have not been included here, and the calculations are based on numbers of full papers received. Thus % acceptance figures are not directly comparable, as a 'preliminary elimination' was conducted for Special issues but not for regular issues. In Editorial 27(4) [1], reference was made to "a 26% increase from 2009 to 2010, and prospectively a 21% increase from 2010 to 2011", in the number of submissions. Tables 1 and 2 show that the actual increase in submissions for regular issues was much larger than expected, being 32% (from 236 in 2010 to 311 in 2011). Thus, the load in conducting the review process was substantially larger than expected. Turning to look at the other main component of editorial work, the increase in copy editing load for 2011 acceptances (including Special issues) was also much larger than expected (78 accepted from 2010 submissions, 121 accepted from 2011 submissions, a 55% increase). Put into a specific time frame, 51 articles were copy edited for AJET publication during January-August 2011, and 73 articles during January-August 2012 - a 43% increase in load. The effort made in the last two years to keep up with the flow of acceptances during 2010-2012 shows up in Figure 1, which displays the number of pages published per year by seven leading educational technology journals. Apart from the 'catch up' changes for AJET, some easing of the growth spurt by Computers & Education, and a recent expansion by Research in Learning Technology, Figure 1 shows relatively little change from the trends displayed in the earlier versions of Figure 1, for 2001-2010 in Editorial 27(1) [2] and for 2001-2007 in Editorial 23(4) [3]. However, the addition of Journal of Computer Assisted Learning shows one leading journal that was not a participant in the 'growth spurt' marking the previous decade. Auckland, 1-4 July 2013. http://conference.herdsa.org.au/2013/ Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2012, 28(7) v 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year Pages AJET BJET C&E ETRD ETS ALT-J JCAL Figure 1: Number of pages per year for seven educational technology journals. Page counts are from each journal's website, excluding Roman numbered pages but including book reviews and other non-Roman page numbered content. Journal URL Australasian Journal of Educational Technology http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ (AJET; Tier B - see [4] for references to 'Tiers') British Journal of Educational Technology http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0007-1013 (BJET; Tier A) Computers & Education http://www.elsevier.com/locate/issn/03601315 (Tier A) Educational Technology, Research and Development http://www.springer.com/east/home/education/learning+%26+inst ruction?SGWID=5-40666-70-50612191-detailsPage=journal|description (ETR&D; Tier A) Educational Technology & Society http://www.ifets.info/others/ (ET&S; Tier B) ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/09687769.asp (new name 2011: Research in Learning Technology) (RLT; Tier A) Journal of Computer Assisted Learning http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2729 (Tier A) Although pages per year data are not showing new trends, there is some scope for interesting new investigations into trends in the topics reported, research context, authors' countries and citation patterns. For example, Hsu, Ho, Tsai, Hwang, Chu, Wang and Chen (2012) [5] conducted content analyses of 2,976 technology-based learning articles that were published in BJET, C&E, ETR&D, ET&S and JCAL [see Notes below Figure 1 for acronyms] from 2000-2009. The articles were characterised into three main categories, research topic (using 12 sub-categories), research sample group (elementary school; junior and senior high school; higher education; etc) and learning domain (science; mathematics; arts and language; etc). This kind of study can be very labour intensive, owing to the large number of articles that have to be read in full by a researcher, but it could be extended readily into research questions that do not require a full reading of each article, such as analyses of country of origin and citation patterns. In particular, research into associations between journal submission patterns occurring for specific groups of authors and journal ranking schemes or bibliometrics could give interesting insights into academic publishing trends [6]. Roger Atkinson AJET Production Editor (retirement pending) vi Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2012, 28(7) Endnotes 1. AJET Editorial 27(4), 2011. AJET review process outcomes: 2010 data. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/editorial27-4.html 2. AJET Editorial 27(1), 2011. Revisiting the 'growth spurt' in educational technology journals. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/editorial27-1.html 3. AJET Editorial 23(4), 2007. Idle Moment No. 24: Growth rates for some leading journals. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/editorial23-4.html 4. AJET Editorial 27(6), 2011. Impact Factor revisited: AJET ranking improved. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/editorial27-6.html 5. Hsu, Y.-C., Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, C.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Chu, H.-C., Wang, C.-Y. & Chen, N.-S. (2012). Research trends in technology-based learning from 2000 to 2009: A content Analysis of publications in selected journals. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (2), 354–370. http://www.ifets.info/journals/15_2/30.pdf 6. Findings from the Production Editor's current investigations into journal submission and reference citation patterns will appear elsewhere, not in AJET. Preprints will appear at http://www.roger-atkinson.id.au/ ACEC 2012 Australian Council for Computers in Education and the Educational Computing Association of Western Australia Perth, 2-5 October 2012 http://acec2012.info/ Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education and Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 26-30 November 2012. http://www.lsl.nie.edu.sg/icce2012/ Sydney, 4-7 February 2013. http://www.odlaasummit.org.au/