




































BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH 11(1) (2026), 1-12 

1 

        MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH 
          BJMSR VOL 11 NO 1 (2026) P-ISSN 2687-850X E-ISSN 2687-8518 

         Available online at https://www.cribfb.com 

     Journal homepage: https://www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/BJMSR 

                                                                                                                                                                                                    Published by CRIBFB, USA 
                                                                                                                              

LEGAL REGULATION OF CYBERATTACKS AND CYBERCRIME: 

ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE AND COUNTERACTION 

STRATEGIES               

             
 Volodymyr Warawa  (a)   Vladyslav Honcharuk  (b)1  Oleksandra Kozlovska (c)  Dina Dryzhakova (d) 

  Valentyn Vyshnevskyi (e) 
 

(a)Associate Professor, Chamber of Operative and Searching Activity, Faculty of Preparing Specialists for Divisions of Criminal Police, National Police 

of Ukraine, Dnipro State University of Internal Affairs, Dnipro, Ukraine; E-mail: warawa@ukr.net  
(b)Associate Professor, Chamber of Information and Financial Security, Institute of Security PJSC “Interregional Academy of Personnel Management” 

(IAPM) Kyiv, Ukraine; E-mail: xrixos@gmail.com 
(c)Lecturer, Department of Intellectual Power and Private Law, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, 

Ukraine; E-mail: dasha7770@ukr.net  
(d)Graduate Student, Department of Criminal Legal Policy and Criminal Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine; E-mail: 

d.dryzhakova@gmail.com  
(e)Candidate of Science of Law, Head of the Maritime Law Department, Educational and Scientific Institute of Maritime Law and Management, National 

University “Odessa Maritime Academy”, Odesa, Ukraine; E-mail: bespeka.ua@gmail.com 

 

 
A R T I C L E I N F O 

 
 

Article History: 

 

Received: 20th June 2025 

Reviewed & Revised: 20th June 2025 

to 28th September 2025 
Accepted: 30th September 2025 

Published: 4th October 2025 

 
Keywords: 

 
Court Practice, Cybercrime, Digital Money, 

Digital Security, Fraud, Innovative 

Technologies 

 
JEL Classification Codes: 

 

      K24, L86 

 

      Peer-Review Model:  

 

      External peer review was done through  

      double-blind method.        

 
A B S T R A C T      

 

 

Rapid digitalization processes in public life have led to a sharp increase in the scale of cybercrime, 

posing a threat to economic stability, data privacy, and national security. The problem is becoming 

particularly relevant in Ukraine in the context of hybrid threats associated with Russian aggression and 

the intensification of cyberattacks. The purpose of this study was to analyze the legal regulation of 
cyberattacks and cybercrimes based on Ukraine's judicial practice, identifying characteristic features 

and trends in the development of law enforcement. To achieve the goal, a systematic review of scientific 

sources, national and international regulatory acts, and an analysis of selected court decisions were 

used. The selection of materials was carried out using the PRISMA methodology. The methods of content 

analysis, comparison, and synthesis were used to process the sources. Scientific publications and court 

cases related to cybercrimes from 2019 to 2023, as well as international conventions, were considered. 

The results show that after the Russian invasion, the number of registered cybercrime cases increased. 
Phishing has become especially popular, accounting for over half of all cases. Most of the crimes were 

of a cross-border nature. As judicial practice has shown, cybercrime in Ukraine has characteristic 

features: it is international, and almost all cases involve financial fraud. The main findings indicate that 

the judicial practice of Ukraine demonstrates the predominance of fraudulent cybercrimes, a significant 

share of which is phishing, as well as systemic difficulties with the procedural provision of electronic 

evidence. 

 
 

© 2025 by the authors. Licensee CRIBFB, USA. This open-access article is distributed under the 
terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license 
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).  

            

       

INTRODUCTION 

The active development of innovative information technologies has resulted from the general, global digitalization of social 

life. At the same time, improvements in document management, finance, and the robotization of production and services 

are closely linked to cybersecurity, which is becoming increasingly crucial in the context of total digitalization. Cyberattacks 

and cybercrime have become serious challenges for government agencies, private companies, and individuals (Erikha & 

Saptomo, 2024). The use of cyberattacks has become a powerful weapon that can cause significant damage not only to 

economic life but also to national security agencies, information privacy rules, and public life in general. In today's 

environment, countering such phenomena has become one of the key challenges for the functioning of national legal systems 

in any state and the operation of international law in the globalized context. Hence, the use of cyberattacks is increasingly 

becoming a tool that can cause paralysis of critical infrastructure, result in significant economic losses, and pose a threat to 

                                                      
1Corresponding Author: ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9627-9530 

© 2025 by the authors. Hosting by CRIBFB. Peer review under responsibility of CRIBFB, USA.  

https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v11i1.2651 

 
To cite this article: Warawa, V., Honcharuk, V., Kozlovska, O., Dryzhakova, D., & Vyshnevskyi, V. (2025). LEGAL REGULATION OF 

CYBERATTACKS AND CYBERCRIME: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE AND COUNTERACTION STRATEGIES. Bangladesh Journal of 

Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v11i1.2651 

mailto:warawa@ukr.net
mailto:dasha7770@ukr.net
mailto:d.dryzhakova@gmail.com
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
https://www.openaccess.nl/en
https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v11i1.2651
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7811-5452
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9627-9530
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2245-0139
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7585-5860
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4547-2127


Warawa et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 11(1) (2026), 1-12

 

2 

national security. 

Legal regulation in cybersecurity encompasses a wide range of measures, from introducing specific legal provisions 

on liability for cyberattacks and cybercrime to developing relevant strategies to prevent such actions and mitigate their 

devastating consequences (Kethineni, 2020; Artemchuk et al., 2024). In general practice, both criminal law aspects and 

administrative or civil law approaches are used. First, the key challenges in ensuring effective investigations of existing 

cybercrimes and establishing jurisdiction in international violations are harmonizing national legal systems and legislation 

with international standards. In this context, an essential element is to consider the existing analysis of judicial practices, 

which will allow us to assess the effectiveness of current regulations, identify specific gaps in the legal system, and propose 

possible solutions to improve the current situation (Hummelholm, 2022). In Ukraine, studying case law also provides 

opportunities to track the evolution of approaches to qualifying cyberattacks, identify areas for understanding responsibility, 

and implement specific preventive measures (Batrachenko et al., 2024). However, the key problems remain the 

harmonization of national legislation with international standards and determining jurisdiction in cases with a cross-border 

element. At the same time, in the context of the war against Ukraine, this problem has become particularly relevant, since 

the number of registered cybercrimes has increased significantly, and judicial practice reveals special difficulties in their 

qualification and proof. This approach is essential for analyzing successful practices of preventing digital crimes in the 

context of Russian aggression (including hybrid challenges of digital attacks). This includes the application of legal expertise 

from various countries, the coordination of interactions with international law enforcement institutions (Khalymon et al., 

2019), and the implementation of specific standards developed as part of the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, among 

other initiatives. 

The scientific problem arises in clarifying the effectiveness of legal mechanisms for countering cyberattacks and 

cybercrimes at the national and international levels. The purpose of the study is to analyze the judicial practice of Ukraine 

in the field of cybercrime and the application of a characteristic feature of law enforcement. The realization of this goal 

involves the following tasks: 1. Determination of the general state of countering cybercrime in Ukraine, study of current 

regulations in this area (national and international). 2. Analysing the most common types of fraud and existing judicial 

practice on the punishment of criminals. The work uses the PRISMA methodology for selecting sources and methods of 

content analysis, comparison, and synthesis to generalize the results. The central research hypothesis is that a comprehensive 

approach that combines legislative, technical, and organizational measures has the potential to ensure an adequate level of 

cyber protection in the modern world. 

The article is structured as follows: the first section provides an overview of modern scientific and legal approaches 

to cybercrime; the second section presents the results of an analysis of Ukrainian judicial practice; the third section discusses 

the findings; and the final section presents the conclusions. 

 

LITERATURE REVIEW 

The legal regulation of cybercrime is formed at the intersection of national and international legal systems and is a subject 

of active scientific discussion. At the same time, a significant portion of modern research emphasizes the need to combine 

international and national instruments to ensure effective countermeasures against digital threats. Pettoello-Mantovani 

(2024) pointed out that such issues require in-depth judicial review, suggesting the possibility of using the International 

Criminal Court for violations in digital space. However, not all researchers support the thesis that international justice is 

essential. For example, Spassova (2023) believes that it is sufficient to use the national competence of courts to bring 

criminals to justice. In contrast to global justice systems, she emphasizes the importance of deep cooperation between courts 

and law enforcement agencies of different countries, which will be the basis for further investigative and judicial actions. 

This view is supported by Wessel and Heim (2023), who emphasize the problematic aspects of using an international judicial 

organization due to the challenges of establishing a unified legal framework for such an institution's work. Alexandrou 

(2021) carried out a separate systematic analysis of international laws and standards. National legal systems are more flexible 

and have extensive networks of courts that effectively regulate legal issues throughout the country. Dragojlović (2023) also 

actualized the problem of extending judicial jurisdiction in cases related to digital offenses. He proposed a compromise 

option, considering the norms of national legal systems while utilizing international standards to regulate the issue of 

cybercrime in the international arena. Against the backdrop of such discussions, Ukrainian cases are somewhat 

overshadowed, which can also be attributed to the issue of the effectiveness of the legal framework in Ukraine for punishing 

cybercriminals. 

Separately, the researchers aimed to summarize existing experiences regarding the possibility of forming certain 

generalizations. We refer to the study by Kagita et al. (2021), which conducted an in-depth analysis of cybercrime in the 

Internet of Things, characterized the specific legal concepts used in such a system, and highlighted existing legal protection 

mechanisms based on examples from Asian court decisions. Similarly, Asian legal practice was analysed by Li and Liu 

(2021), who conducted a thorough review of the scientific literature on combating digital crimes at the national and 

international levels (with an emphasis on Chinese legal proceedings). Noor Uddin Milon et al. (2024) highlighted the 

methodological capabilities of the PRISMA scientific method for classifying cybercrime, identified some challenges in 

applying this approach, and outlined prospects for further scientific investigation. The final study by Verma and Shri (2022) 

provides an overview of the possibilities of controlling and counteracting digital offenses. They identified some of the 

challenges law enforcement faces in protecting against cyberattacks. The researchers also characterized the active growth 

of cyber challenges in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era, which is attributed to the introduction of remote services, digital 

documentation, and other factors. At the same time, Mezei and Szentgály-Tóth (2023) highlighted the threat of cyberattacks 

on online platforms, as this area is largely unregulated by law, primarily due to the rapid development of online platforms 



Warawa et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 11(1) (2026), 1-12

 

3 

outpacing legislative regulation. In a legal vacuum, court decisions can serve as specific markers to guide future legislative 

initiatives. Some crucial conclusions are contained in the summarizing papers on the legal experience of countering cyber 

threats in individual countries. The original systems of South Africa and Indonesia, whose governments closely monitor the 

current digital challenges, offer separate legal solutions to define individual and collective criminal acts (Snail Ka Mtuze & 

Musoni, 2023). Although the studies presented here are generalizable, their results are critical for considering international 

experience in regulating digital crimes. Instead, these studies focus on the Asian experience of countering such cases, 

whereas the Ukrainian context requires improved assessments. 

The study by Baranovska (2024), which examines the current challenges to Ukraine's cybersecurity and highlights 

the potential solutions to counter the latest threats (including the hybrid threat posed by the aggressive Kremlin regime), is 

crucial for understanding the Ukrainian law enforcement system. Instead, other studies have identified the crisis of modern 

culture through the lens of philosophical vision, which is also related to relationships in the digital space (Borysenko et al., 

2024). The researchers determined that, in some cases, the inability to behave appropriately in the digital world can lead to 

falling prey to criminals. At the same time, authors emphasized the need to develop digital security through the lens of the 

widespread adoption of digital currency in Ukraine and its increasing use in payment transactions (Tumalavičius, 2022). 

The results obtained by the researchers can be compared with the European experience, as summarized in Danidou's (2020) 

work, which identified the importance of a harmonized legal framework as a key factor in building a strong financial market 

in the international space. Similar conclusions were drawn by other authors, who highlighted the importance of legal 

protection for agricultural operations and related economic sectors (Lavrov et al., 2022). In a globalized digital society, such 

problems are becoming global and beyond the Ukrainian legal framework. However, this issue will require further study, 

as the discussion points proposed by the authors have not yet been adequately evaluated in the scientific literature. In 

Ukrainian realities, however, the importance of using digital attacks as a side effect of Russian military aggression has been 

emphasized (Kozlovskyi et al., 2023). Similarly, scholars emphasize certain court decisions that have theoretical value in 

countering cyberattacks in the short term (Cherniavskyi et al., 2021). This issue remains relevant, as digital offenses are 

evolving in tandem with innovative technologies, necessitating the continuous development of theoretical knowledge to 

combat existing challenges.  

Moreover, modern research has shown that the problem of legal regulation of cybercrime goes far beyond criminal 

law and concerns the functioning of the judicial system as a whole. One of the key topics is the issue of conflict of interest 

in the activities of judges, which directly affects the quality of consideration of cases related to digital offenses. A 

comparative analysis of Ukrainian and European practice has shown that the lack of precise mechanisms for preventing 

conflicts reduces trust in judicial decisions in the field of digital security and requires greater transparency in law 

enforcement (Shevchuk et al., 2023a; Shevchuk et al., 2023b). A separate layer of research focuses on hybrid wars, in which 

cyberattacks have become an important tool. An analysis of international experience has shown that the combination of 

military and cyber operations creates legal dilemmas for states and international organizations, particularly regarding the 

jurisdiction and qualification of the actions of attackers (Simons, Danyk, & Maliarchuk, 2020). Research in African 

countries has shown that developing specialized laws in the field of cybersecurity can be effective even with limited 

resources. The legal system of South Africa has demonstrated an example of an active legislative response to the growth of 

cybercrime, laying the groundwork for a comprehensive counteraction to digital threats (Snail ka Mtuze & Musoni, 2023). 

The legal regulation of attacks on satellite communications has also become an important aspect. Researchers have 

emphasized the blurring of the boundaries between cybercrime and interference with technology. This fact presents new 

challenges for lawyers to develop a unified approach to qualifying such actions (Spassova, 2023). The institutional approach 

to countering digital threats is also evident within administrative law. Ukraine's experience has demonstrated the need to 

establish separate mechanisms that effectively combat corruption in the field of territorial defense, which also has a cyber 

dimension in terms of ensuring digital infrastructure (Sysoiev et al., 2024). Research on digital currencies deserves special 

attention. The challenges associated with blockchain projects and cryptocurrencies underscore the lack of a unified 

international legal framework, which complicates the protection of user rights and creates conditions for digital crimes in 

the realm of financial relations (Tumalavičius, 2022). Generalizing studies at the international level have indicated a wide 

range of digital threats. In particular, reviews of modern crimes in the field of cybersecurity have indicated uneven legal 

responses, the lack of unified protection measures, and the constant evolution of attack methods (Verma & Shri, 2022).  

The theoretical basis for studying cybercrime is also provided by a fundamental monograph, which reveals the 

peculiarities of the interaction between cybercrime and cybersecurity on a global scale. The author emphasizes that the 

dynamism of digital threats significantly exceeds the pace of legal regulation (Watters, 2023).  

A separate area of research concerns the inconsistency in international regulation of cyber threats. The lack of 

consistency between different legal systems leads to the problem of fragmented approaches, which in turn complicates 

effective investigation and the pursuit of justice for perpetrators (Wessel & Heim, 2023). 

Summarizing the above sources, modern research highlights various international and national aspects of the legal 

regulation of cybercrime. They have employed a variety of approaches, ranging from global institutional decisions to local 

judicial practices. At the same time, a common feature is the recognition of the law's lack of adaptability to the rapid 

development of digital technologies, which forms the basis for further research. Moreover, the lack of consensus on 

cybercrime law enforcement and regulation creates a basis for further research. Additionally, there is a lack of analysis of 

judicial practice in cybercrime, despite some studies on cybercrime case law. Therefore, this study aims to help close these 

gaps, analyze judicial practice through the lens of law enforcement effectiveness in cybersecurity, and formulate 

recommendations for enhancing mechanisms for bringing cybercriminals to justice. 

 

 



Warawa et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 11(1) (2026), 1-12

 

4 

MATERIALS AND METHODS 
Research Design 

The type of research is mixed, combining a systematic review of scientific sources with a review of legal cases. The case 

study approach was chosen as it is the most suitable method for examining the realities of judicial practice in a specific 

country. Additionally, this approach was chosen because it enables us to examine specific cases of cybercrime litigation, 

thereby helping to determine the effectiveness of current legislation, court decisions, and law enforcement practices (Ahmad 

et al., 2024). This is especially important in the constant evolution of digital threats. The analysis incorporates court case 

materials, legislative acts, and scholarly literature. This study aims to provide new insights into the most common judicial 

cases related to cybercrime and characterize the typical features of cybercriminal activities. 

 

Materials 
Various sources were selected for inclusion, including accessible court cases, legislative acts, and scholarly literature. The 

sampling of materials was purposive and based on pre-established inclusion criteria. These criteria addressed aspects such 

as the type of case, time frame, availability of materials, relevance, validity, alignment with the research topic, and language 

of publication. Specific considerations included jurisdiction, type of case, duration of proceedings, and the availability of 

court cases for inclusion. Different criteria were developed for including legislative acts, focusing on their relevance, 

validity, and the hierarchical level of the normative legal act. These criteria were formulated to ensure the inclusion of the 

most relevant and up-to-date laws for studying the specific features of cybercrime regulation. Table 1 provides an overview 

of the key inclusion criteria for the materials. 

 

Table 1. Criteria for inclusion of court cases 

 
No. Criterion Description The type of 

materials 

1 Jurisdiction Court cases that were considered in the courts of Ukraine Court cases 

2 Case type Court cases related to cybercrime or international legal assistance in the field of 

cybercrime 

Court cases 

3 The term of 

consideration 

Cases reviewed for 2023-2024. 

Scientific literature from 2019 to 2024 

Court cases 

4 Accessibility Publicly available court decisions or materials that allow for a thorough analysis were 

included. 

Publicly available scientific literature 

Court cases 

Nonfiction 

5 Accessibility Works or legislative acts describing the specifics of the regulation of the issue of 

cybersecurity or the protection of personal data 

Nonfiction 

Legislative acts 

6 Accessibility Documents that are valid at the time of the research Legislative acts 

7 Regulatory and legal 
level 

National laws and government regulations are included Legislative acts 

8 Subject Materials devoted to issues of cyber security, cyberspace protection, legal regulation, or 

the study of judicial practice 

The materials highlight the peculiarities of judicial practice implementation in Ukraine. 

Court cases, 

Legislative acts 

Nonfiction 

9 Source type Monographs, scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals, reviews, and conferences 

General theoretical works, in which it is difficult to identify the type, were not eligible 

for inclusion. 

Nonfiction 

10 Language of writing Ukrainian, English 

For scientific literature, the presence of an English-language annotation is mandatory. 

Court cases 

Nonfiction  

11 Authority Studies written by leading researchers 

Works published in peer-reviewed journals 

Nonfiction 

Source: Authors’ Elaboration 

 

Thus, using these criteria, court cases, legislative acts, and scholarly literature were selected for analysis, with a 

focus on issues related to cybersecurity, cyberspace protection, legal regulation, and judicial practice studies. 

 

Procedure and Tools 
The PRISMA approach was employed for processing and screening scientific materials (Figure 1). This approach is widely 

used in academic research to select and analyse the most relevant scholarly literature and other sources. Initially, Scopus 

and Google Scholar were chosen as the scientometric databases. Search queries included keywords such as cybersecurity, 

digital data protection, judicial practice, courts, penalties, Ukraine, EU, and challenges. A total of 3,367 results were 

obtained.  

First, all duplicates were removed (-1,156), leaving 2,211 items of scholarly literature for screening. The next step 

involved screening all sources based on their abstracts and keywords, excluding 789 items. An additional 510 items were 

excluded because they were deemed irrelevant to the research topic. Subsequently, the main inclusion criteria were applied. 

Several legislative acts, relevant websites, and platforms containing court cases (30 items) were identified through the search 

engines. Court cases were located on the Opendatabot platform using the keyword "cybersecurity." After screening, nine 

court cases and several laws were selected from the platform. 

The principal collected cases focused on the following areas. Cases related to cyberattacks or cybercrimes. 2. Cases 

demonstrating typical challenges in law enforcement. 3. Decisions that established significant precedents in the field of 

cybercrime. Additionally, information from one website providing general statistical data was included. 



Warawa et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 11(1) (2026), 1-12

 

5 

 
Figure 1. The step-by-step screening and selection of materials 

 

Data Analysis 
A systematic organization and classification by specific thematic categories was conducted using the PRISMA 

methodological approach to analyze the collected materials. Qualitative analysis was performed using Google Sheets 

software. Specifically, three spreadsheets were created within the program. 

The first spreadsheet focused on scholarly literature and included the following components: author, year of 

publication, cybersecurity features, definitions of cybercrime, and descriptions of judicial practice. The second spreadsheet 

addressed key legislative acts, consisting of the law number, adoption date, adaptation date, definitions of cybercrime, and 

other primary legislative regulations. The third spreadsheet pertained to court cases, including the case number, the name 

of the court where the case was heard, and the essence of the case, including its main aspects and conclusions. 

Following the classification of the data, a qualitative analysis was conducted for each category. To present the 

findings clearly, graphs and tables were used to illustrate the distribution of cybercrimes by category, the distribution of 

court cases by topic, and the proportion of international versus national decisions in cybercrime cases. Additionally, a 

comparative method was employed to align court case data and legislative acts with insights from scholarly literature. This 

combination of visual representation and comparative analysis enabled a more precise comparison and synthesis of the 

collected data. 

 

RESULTS 

Analyzing current legislation, cybercrime is defined as an unlawful act committed through information and communication 

technologies, aimed at compromising the security of computer systems, networks, data, or information resources. 

Consequently, such crimes can cause harm to individuals, organisations, governments, or society (Mezzetti et al., 2024). 

Without specialised knowledge, detecting, recording, and seizing forensically relevant information about a cybercrime is 

difficult (Gajjar & Taherdoost, 2024). Cybercrime is characterised by an exceptionally high level of latency and rapid growth 

in the number of crimes (Watters, 2023). This is primarily due to the rapid spread of the Internet in various fields. The key 

 

  

    

 

 

 

 

Records identified 

from: 
Databases (n = 

3367) 

 

Records removed 

before screening: 
Duplicate 

records 

removed (n = 

1156) 

 

Records screened 
(n = 2211) 

Records excluded 

by analysis of 

keywords, abstracts  
(n = 789 ) 

Reports sought for 

retrieval 
(n = 1422) 

Reports not retrieved 
(n = 510) 

Reports assessed 

for eligibility 
(n = 912) 

Reports excluded: 
С.4 (n = 143 ) 
С. 5 (n =101 ) 
С. 8 (n = 289 ) 
С.9 (n = 15) 
С. 10 (n = 182 ) 
С.11. (n = 142) 

Records identified 

from: 
Websites (n = 7) 
Organisations (n = 5) 
Laws (5) 
Сourt cases (13) 

  

Assessed for 

eligibility 
(n = 22) 

Excluded 
С.1  
(n = 3) 
С.2  
(n = 1) 
С. 3  
(n = 2) 
С. 4 
(n = 1) 
С. 6 
(n = 0) 
С. 7 
(n = 1) 
С. 8.  
(n = 3) 
С.10. 
(n = 1) 

Materials included  
(n = 56) 

Identification of studies via databases and 

registers 
Identification of other 

materials 

Materials 
sought for 
retrieval 
(n = 30) 

Materials 

not 

retrieved 
(n = 3) 

Id
e

n
ti

fi
c
a
ti

o
n
 

S
c
re

e
n

in
g
 

 
In

c
lu

d
e

d
 



Warawa et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 11(1) (2026), 1-12

 

6 

features of cybercrime are its transnational nature, technical complexity, speed of crime, and harm to large groups of people. 

The figure illustrates the primary characteristics of cybercrime (See Figure 2). 

 

 
Figure 2. Main features of cybercrime 

 

As of 2017-2018, more than half of the reported cyber frauds (42%) were related to the absence of payment or 

delivery (Buçaj & Idrizaj, 2024). This category primarily included purchases made from fraudulent online stores that the 

victim had never used before. Alternatively, it was concerned with promised payments that were never received. 

Approximately 28% of cybercrime involved the leakage of personal data and phishing. At the same time, identity theft, 

credit card fraud, and other cyberattacks were relatively rare (Despotović et al., 2023). Since 2022, phishing has become 

particularly popular, accounting for over half of online criminal activity. Since the emergence of email phishing, hackers 

have improved the system, so that researchers now distinguish several types of this cybercrime: smishing (using messages), 

phishing (using calls), and imitation of resources popular with users, such as websites of public organisations, charity 

websites, email sites, or payment services (see Table 2). 

 

Table 2. Types of Cybercrimes 

 
Type of cybercrime 2017 2022 

Non-payment or lack of delivery 41.6% 9.2% 

Personal data leakage 15.3% 10.4% 

Non-payment or lack of delivery 41.6% 9.2% 

Investment fraud 1.5% 5.4% 

Technical support desk 5.4% 5.8% 

Extortion 7.4% 7% 

Card fraud 7.5% 4.1% 

Personal information theft 8.7% 5% 

Phishing 12.5% 53.2% 

Source: Authors’ Own Elaboration 

 

Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, the activity of cyber fraudsters in Ukraine has increased significantly 

(Kuzior et al., 2024). 11% of people have become victims of fraud since the start of the full-scale invasion. Women fell into 

the hacker trap more often than men. According to statistics, young people predominate among the victims of fraud, with 

18-24 year olds (14%) and those aged 65 and above (11.5%) being the most affected. In 2022, the total amount of losses 

incurred by banks, merchants, and customers due to illegal actions involving payment cards increased by 47%. More than 

half of the losses were caused by social engineering. Thus, in Ukraine, since 2022, people have become victims of fraudsters 

because they have provided their card details, one-time passwords to confirm transactions, or basic data for logging into 

online banking. In general, most fraudulent incidents occur during transactions, such as the purchase or sale of goods online, 

accounting for more than 52%. Fraudulent phishing links were also popular, accounting for almost 19%. The list of common 

fraudulent manipulations includes hacking of social media accounts (12%) and telephone solicitation (10.2%) (see Figure 

3). 

 
Figure 3. Types of cybercrimes in Ukraine 

Source: Fintech Insider (2023) 

Extortion of information over the phone (10.2%) Hacking of social networks (12%)

Using fraudulent links (18.6%) When buying or selling goods online (52.7%)

Other (6.5%)

  

 
Transnational 

Activities 

 

 
Criminals operate 

from anywhere in the 

world. This makes it 

difficult to detect and 

prosecute them. 

 
Use of innovative 

technologies 

 

 
Cybercrimes require 

specialized skills and 

the use of innovative 

technologies. 

 Speed of Crime 

 

 
Crimes can be 

committed in a matter 

of seconds. 

 Large-scale harm 

 

 
A single crime can 

affect thousands of 

people 

simultaneously 



Warawa et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 11(1) (2026), 1-12

 

7 

Ten cases related to cybersecurity regulation were selected for analysis. The analysis of court practice in responding 

to cybercrime in Ukraine reveals that cases related to cybercrime exhibit several characteristic features. Cybercrime is a 

transnational phenomenon, as evidenced by the fact that criminals can often operate online from different parts of the world, 

and victims or affected individuals may be located in another country. Accordingly, this requires developing unique 

cooperation between states to respond effectively to such offences. In this case, based on the analysis of the court case 

documents, No. 1 of the Solomianskyi District Court of Kyiv or No. 2 of the Odesa Court of Appeal, Ukraine, provided 

international legal assistance to Slovenia in investigating a cybercrime that caused damage to a Slovenian citizen. In Ukraine, 

access to documents and things in such cases is granted based on Article 159 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. 

This, in turn, requires temporary access to things and documents in the possession of a person or organisation that is part of 

an international criminal investigation (Kravtsov et al., 2024). The analysis of case No. 3 (Malynovskyi District Court of 

Odesa) outlines the detention of a person at the border on suspicion of committing a cybercrime. The legal basis for this was 

used: §1343 of Title 18 of the US Code (fraud, financial fraud), and the international wanted list was also confirmed by 

Interpol's blanks. Based on the analysis of Case No. 4 (Odesa Court of Appeal), a decision was made to extradite an Uzbek 

citizen to the United States for prosecution for cybercrime. Table 3 provides a detailed analysis of these cases.  

 

Table 3. Analysis of court cases 

 
No., Institution The case Main aspects Other information 

No. 1: Solomianskyi 

District Court of 

Kyiv 

A citizen of Slovenia was a victim of 

cryptocurrency-related fraud. The 

cybercrime was committed through a 

platform that operated without the 
permission of the financial regulator, the 

FCA. 

International component 

Crime: fraud: misrepresentation to gain 

access to cryptocurrencies 

Notification of the victim by a 
representative of the platform 

Forming links between messages, the 

platform, and cryptocurrency transactions. 

Involvement of international cooperation 

mechanisms. 

No. 2: Odesa Court of 

Appeal 

Extradition of a citizen of Uzbekistan 

The US authorities want the person for 

fraud and cybercrime related to the theft 

of cryptocurrencies. 

Risk of avoiding responsibility. 

The crimes correspond to Art. 190 of the 

Criminal Code of Ukraine (fraud) 

Nature of the crime: large-scale and 

international level. 

The focus is on compliance with international 

standards for extradition. Ensuring the 

observance of human rights during the 

extradition process. 

No. 3: Malynovskyi 

District Court of 

Odesa 

Detention at the border on suspicion of 

committing a cybercrime 

Crime: fraud: 

The legal basis is Section 1343 of Title 

18 of the USA Code (fraud, financial 
fraud). International search: 

confirmation by Interpol records. 

Amount of loss: USD 11.8 million (theft 

of cryptocurrencies). 

Prepare a professional extradition check in 

accordance with international standards and 

regulations. Ensure transparency of the 
process. 

No. 4: Odesa Court of 

Appeal 

The Prosecutor General of Ukraine has 

decided to extradite a citizen of 

Uzbekistan to the United States for 

prosecution on criminal charges related 

to cybercrime. 

Crime: fraud: 

Main corpus delicti: financial fraud 

(analogous to Part 5 of Article 190 of the 

Criminal Code of Ukraine). 

Evidence: confirmation of the request by 
the US Department of Justice. 

Extradition: justified by a crime 

punishable by more than 1 year in 

prison. 

It is essential to follow all procedures when 

transferring someone to the United States. 

The risks associated with appealing the 

extradition decision are also taken into 

account. 

No. 5: Prymorskyi 

District Court of 

Odesa 

Temporary arrest of a person wanted by 

the competent authorities of the United 

States of America for cybercrime 

Crime: fraud 

The person is on the international 

wanted list 

The crimes the suspect is suspected of 
include fraud and cybercrime related to 

financial fraud. 

Temporary arrest to ensure extradition. 

Source: Unified Register of Court Decisions (2024) 

 

On the other hand, an essential part of investigating cybercrime is collecting evidence from electronic systems 

(Ghimire, 2023). Cybercrime usually leaves electronic traces. Therefore, it is essential to consider data such as emails, 

correspondence, IP addresses, and transactions in electronic payment systems, among other relevant information. 

Accordingly, modern judicial authorities should have access to this information to collect evidence confirming the fact of 

the crime (Kelly & Montasari, 2023). In the case of Case No. 6, to collect evidence, the prosecutor applied to the court for 

temporary access to items and documents, including making copies of information from mobile terminals and computer 

systems used during the commission of the crime. Table 4 identifies the key aspects and additional information gathered 

from the analysis of other cases.  

 

Table 4. Key aspects and additional information gathered from the analysis of other cases 

 
No., Institution Case Key aspects Other information 

No. 6: Kherson City Court An investigator's application for 

temporary access to bank documents 

related to a cybercrime resulted in the 

unlawful withdrawal of UAH 46,200 

from the victim's account. The victim 

fell victim to a fraudulent scheme on 
the Telegram channel. 

Corpus delicti: Part 3 Article 190 of the 

Criminal Code of Ukraine (fraud) 

Technical aspect of the fraud: phishing 

attack to gain access to bank data.  

Reasoning for the request: access to 

bank documents to verify transactions.  

Paying attention to key technical evidence 

(phishing, changing the phone's 

3DSecure) and ensuring that the 

investigation is supported by digital 

expertise.   



Warawa et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 11(1) (2026), 1-12

 

8 

No. 7: Commercial Court of 

Cassation of the Supreme 

Court 

The plaintiff in the case is an 

agricultural enterprise that filed a 

lawsuit against the bank for 
unauthorized debiting of funds from its 

account. The case discusses 

cybersecurity and the bank's 

responsibility for protecting client 

funds. 

Technical and financial capabilities. 

The bank has significantly greater 

cybersecurity capabilities than the 
claimant. 

The client has the right to protect their 

funds on the account, as provided for by 

the Constitution of Ukraine. 

The Supreme Court recommends that the 

bank be obliged to ensure adequate 

security to prevent unauthorised financial 
transactions. 

No. 8: Zmiivskyi District 

Court of Kharkiv Region 

This case concerns criminal 

proceedings based on a crime under 

Article 185(4) of the Criminal Code of 

Ukraine (theft). 

Extract from the Unified Register of 

Pre-trial Investigations confirming the 

fact of criminal proceedings. 

Report of the officer on duty about the 
cybercrime. 

A statement about the criminal offence. 

Protocol of interrogation of the victim. 

Images of a bank card that may be part 

of the evidence. 

In this case, pursuant to Article 159 of the 

Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, 

temporary access to items and documents 

is granted for inspection, copying, or 
seizure. 

No. 9: Shevchenkivskyi 

District Court of Kyiv 

The case concerns unauthorised access 

to citizens' personal data by an 

employee of the bank's IT support 

department. The person accessed 
confidential information of the bank's 

clients and used it to commit financial 

crimes. 

Temporary access to the bank's 

electronic systems was granted to 

verify log files and evidence of 

unauthorised transactions. 
The court agreed to the temporary 

access to the bank's data, as the 

electronic systems contained 

information about specific transactions 

and abuses. 

The court granted the prosecutor's request 

and allowed temporary access to the 

bank's relevant electronic systems to 

facilitate the collection of evidence.  
Court practice shows the importance of 

controlling the collection of electronic 

evidence in cybercrime. This enables the 

effective investigation of such cases 

without compromising the rights of 

citizens. 

Source: Unified Register of Court Decisions (2024) 

 

Therefore, in counteracting, documenting, and investigating certain cybercrime-related offences, using electronic 

images as evidence in criminal proceedings is becoming a crucial area. In particular, the study of electronic images and 

information in the service options of operating systems enables a clear description of the main facts of criminal offenses, 

identification of individuals, description of methods and ways of committing a crime, and assessment of the damage caused 

(Greiman, 2022). This can also be particularly important for confirming and refuting other versions of events. However, it 

should also be noted that collecting electronic evidence is essential and a complex process that may encounter several 

challenges. This may include regulating specialist participation, providing appropriate technical support for investigators, 

ensuring the reliability of the information received, and verifying the accuracy of data obtained from the Internet. 

 

DISCUSSIONS 

The main research problem, namely a detailed study of the judicial practice of responding to cybercrimes in Ukraine, 

determined that cybercrime is one of the key problems in the law enforcement field, which worries modern developed 

countries, including Ukraine. Such increased interest in cybercrime is not accidental, but instead caused by the prevalence 

of criminal offenses of this type. In particular, the results showed that the number of cybercrime cases registered in Ukraine 

increased during the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In the period from 2022, phishing became especially popular, with more 

than half of all cases of this type of crime being recorded. This finding aligns with other studies that indicate phishing is a 

common trend in cybercrime, necessitating serious legal action (Sarkar & Shukla, 2024). Therefore, the increasing trends 

in the number of cybercrime cases detected have led to an increased interest in the international scientific community in 

studying the problems of cybercrime and its main directions of combating. 

The proposed results also indicate that the activities of cyber fraudsters have undergone significant changes since 

the beginning of the full-scale invasion by Russian troops. If, in 2017, prominent cases involved the extortion of funds 

through online delivery and order tools, then, in 2022, phishing would have become the primary type of digital crime. Such 

results are also confirmed by the findings of other researchers, who have shown that criminals have shifted from direct 

interaction with a potential victim to acquiring her data using digital tools (Chaika et al., 2024). Scientists believe this 

process is also connected to a financial component, as many Ukrainian citizens receive payments from European 

humanitarian aid funds, higher salaries during martial law conditions, and so on. Along with a generally poor digital culture, 

this makes them vulnerable to cyber manipulation (Reva & Demchenko, 2024). At the same time, the legal regulatory 

mechanisms for cybercrime prevention are extremely weak: it is almost impossible for phishing victims to prove their 

innocence in court, as they cannot confirm that the actions taken with their accounts and registries did not occur against 

their will. 

The analysis of the judicial practice of responding to cybercrimes in Ukraine shows that cases related to 

cybercrimes have several characteristic features, in particular: they are of a transnational type, because, as practice shows, 

criminals can often operate on the Internet from different parts of the world, and victims or affected persons may be in 

another country. In Ukrainian reality, access to documents and the belongings of suspects is carried out in accordance with 

Article 159 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (Law of Ukraine No. 912-IX, 2020). Another feature of the criminal 

cases in Ukraine is that almost all are related to financial fraud. Such results are confirmed by the conclusions of other 

scientists, which generally indicate the spread of financial fraud in the digital age. The suspects' guilt was proven in local 

and national courts, after which a warrant was issued. Researchers recognise such a mechanism as quite effective and 

efficient, such that it does not require the introduction of supranational judicial bodies with new powers (Gallant, 2022). At 

the same time, it is also worth considering the views of researchers who suggest that digital crimes of the future may be 

even more complex than financial fraud (Simons et al., 2020). The Ukrainian experience has shown that hacker attacks 



Warawa et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 11(1) (2026), 1-12

 

9 

organised at the state level by the Kremlin regime are a real threat requiring an international legal assessment. Implementing 

this process only within the limits of national legislation is impossible. 

It is also noted in the proposed results that collecting evidence from electronic systems is a highly relevant aspect 

of investigating cybercrimes. Cybercrimes are not traceless and leave specific electronic traces. Modern judicial authorities 

in Ukraine require access to e-mail, correspondence, IP addresses, transactions in electronic payment systems, and other 

relevant information. The analysed court cases demonstrated that law enforcement officers focused on these details while 

collecting the necessary evidence. Thus, case law shows the importance of controlling the collection of electronic evidence 

in cybercrimes. This allows us to effectively investigate such cases without violating the rights of citizens. Such results 

confirm the researchers' conclusions that the collection of evidence in the field of cybercrimes requires excellent care and 

professional involvement of specialists (Muliarevych, 2024; Vitvitskiy et al., 2021). At the same time, technologies are 

constantly improving, so the researchers' view is correct that the legal framework that regulates access to obtaining 

appropriate evidence should also be updated periodically (Pasupuleti, 2024). As scientists point out, such experiences are 

already being actively implemented in other countries (Sysoiev et al., 2024). Therefore, in Ukrainian realities, it is also 

worthwhile to review separate approaches to the legal framework and the mechanisms for its implementation. This makes 

it possible to confirm the hypothesis that only an integrated approach (legislative, technical, and organisational measures) 

can ensure an adequate level of cyber protection in the modern world. In the Ukrainian reality, it is necessary to implement 

numerous measures to achieve lasting positive dynamics. 

At the same time, it is necessary to consider certain limitations of the methodology used in the study, which may 

affect the further interpretation of the obtained results and their scientific significance. First, the selection of necessary 

scientific literature had certain limits. Emphasis on English-language scientific texts published in professional, peer-

reviewed publications has advantages, as such articles have undergone the necessary peer review and preliminary discussion. 

However, there is a possibility that some relevant opinions published in non-English-language articles were not considered 

in the obtained results. This aspect must be considered when applying the results found in the article. 
 

CONCLUSIONS  

The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal regulation of cyberattacks and cybercrimes in Ukraine, drawing on judicial 

practice and international experience. Summarizing the results, in the context of active digitalization and the war in Ukraine, 

the number of cybercrimes has increased significantly, with more than half of them being phishing attacks, and the majority 

being of a financial and fraudulent nature. The analysis of judicial practice showed difficulties in qualifying cybercrimes, 

collecting and evaluating electronic evidence, and also identified the need for more precise procedural regulation. The data 

obtained showed that modern legal mechanisms are not yet fully adapted to the dynamics of digital threats. It was determined 

that collecting evidence from electronic systems is a crucial part of investigating cybercrimes. Judicial authorities will need 

access to email, correspondence, IP addresses, transactions in electronic payment systems, and other relevant information. 

The court cases studied suggest a need to regulate the collection of electronic evidence in cybercrime cases. As innovative 

technologies continue to improve, it is essential to consider this development when refining the legal framework and creating 

new bylaws and guidelines that will shape the principles of countering cybercrimes in the future. Therefore, applying 

complex legislative, technical, and organisational solutions will make it possible to ensure the appropriate level of cyber 

protection. 

The unique contribution of this work lies in the combination of Ukrainian judicial practice analysis with 

international approaches, which enabled us to identify both the general features of cybercrime and the specific problems 

inherent in Ukraine. Additionally, a quantitative analysis of the main types of cybercrimes was conducted, enabling us to 

identify trends in their development more accurately. The theoretical significance of the study lies in the development of a 

systemic vision of the problems of legal regulation of cybercrime in both global and national contexts. The practical 

significance lies in the possibility of using the results obtained to enhance law enforcement activities, improve the 

organization of the judicial process, and strengthen digital security in Ukraine. 

A limitation of the study is its focus on the Ukrainian legal field and the analysis of selected court decisions, which 

do not cover the full range of cybercrimes. Moreover, the selection of necessary scientific literature had certain limits. 

Emphasis on English-language scientific texts published in professional, peer-reviewed publications has advantages, as such 

articles have undergone the necessary peer review and preliminary discussion. The prospects for future research lie in 

expanding the analysis to other countries, comparing the features of national legal systems, as well as in a more detailed 

study of the effectiveness of international cooperation mechanisms in the field of cybersecurity. 

 
 

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, V.W., V.H., O.K., D.D. and V.V.; Methodology, V.W., V.H., O.K., D.D. and V.V.; Software, V.W.; 
Validation, V.W., V.H., O.K., D.D. and V.V.; Formal Analysis, V.W., V.H., O.K., D.D. and V.V.; Investigation, V.W., V.H., O.K., D.D. and V.V.; 

Resources, V.W., V.H., O.K., D.D. and V.V.; Data Curation, V.W., V.H., O.K., D.D. and V.V.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, V.W., V.H., O.K, 

D.D. and V.V.; Writing – Review & Editing, V.W., V.H.,, O.K., D.D. and V.V.; Visualization, V.W.; Supervision, V.W.; Project Administration, V.W.; 
Funding Acquisition, V.W., V.H., O.K., D.D. and V.V. Authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. 

Institutional Review Board Statement: Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to that the research does not deal with vulnerable 

groups or sensitive issues. 
Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research. 

Acknowledgments: The authors have no acknowledgments to declare. 

Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. 
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available 

due to restrictions. 

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   



Warawa et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 11(1) (2026), 1-12

 

10 

REFERENCES 

Ahmad, N., Rahim, F., & Aziz, N. (2024). Can international humanitarian law regulate recent drone strikes?: A case study. 

Journal of East Asia and International Law, 17(1), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.14330/jeail.2024.17.1.09 

Alexandrou, A. (2021). Cybercrime and information technology: Theory and practice: The computer network 

infrastructure and computer security, cybersecurity laws, Internet of Things (IoT), and mobile devices (1st ed.). 

CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429318726 

Artemchuk, M., Marukhlenko, O., Sokrovolska, N., Mazur, H., & Riznyk, D. (2024). The impact of economic recession 

on the financial support of state functions during crisis situations. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic 

Fields, 15(2), 350. https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v15.2(30).15 

Baranovska, T. (2024). The impact of cybercrime on state and institutional security: Analysis of threats and potential 

protection measures. Economic Affairs, 69(1s). https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2024.5 

Batrachenko, T., Lehan, I., Kuchmenko, V., Kovalchuk, V., & Mazurenko, O. (2024). Cybercrime in the context of the 

digital age: Analysis of threats, legal challenges and strategies. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6, 2024ss0212. 

https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0212 

Borysenko, O., Marukhovskа-Kartunova, O., Volkova, V., Baran, A., & Maraieva, U. (2024). The influence of social 

networks on the formation of modern culture and its relationship with philosophy. Futurity Philosophy, 3(3), 80–

94. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2024.09.30.05 

Buçaj, E., & Idrizaj, K. (2024). The need for cybercrime regulation on a global scale by the international law and cyber 

convention. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(1), 2025024. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025024 

Chaika, O., Sharmanova, N., & Makaruk, O. (2024). Revitalising endangered languages: Challenges, successes, and 

cultural implications. Futurity of Social Sciences, 2(2), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2024.06.20.03 

Cherniavskyi, S., Babanina, V., Mykytchyk, O., & Mostepaniuk, L. (2021). Measures to combat cybercrime: Analysis of 

international and Ukrainian experience. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(69), 115–132. 

https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.06 

Danidou, Y. (2020). Trusted computing initiative on the spectrum of EU cyber-security legal framework. In T.-E. 

Synodinou, P. Jougleux, C. Markou, & T. Prastitou (Eds.), EU Internet law in the digital era (pp. 277–296). 

Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25579-4_13 

Despotović, A., Parmaković, A., & Miljković, M. (2023). Cybercrime and cybersecurity in fintech. In S. Benković, A. 

Labus, & M. Milosavljević (Eds.), Digital transformation of the financial industry (pp. 255–272). Springer 

International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23269-5_15 

Dragojlović, J. (2023). Jurisdiction for criminal offenses of cybercrime: International and national standards. Pravo - 

Teorija i Praksa, 40(suppl), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2300063D 

Erikha, A., & Saptomo, A. (2024). Dilemma of legal policy to address cybercrime in the digital era. Asian Journal of Social 

and Humanities, 3(3), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i3.452 

Fintech Insider. (2023, November 7). Cyber fraudsters are becoming more active in Ukraine and the world. What tools do 

they use and how do they protect themselves? Retrieved from https://fintechinsider.com.ua/kibershahrayi-stayut-

aktyvnishymy-v-ukrayini-ta-sviti-yaki-instrumenty-vony-vykorystovuyut-ta-yak-zahystytysya/ 

Gajjar, V. R., & Taherdoost, H. (2024). Cybercrime on a global scale: Trends, policies, and cybersecurity strategies. In 

2024 5th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Sustainable Informatics (ICMCSI) (pp. 668–676). 

IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMCSI61536.2024.00105 

Gallant, K. S. (2022). The national and international law of criminal jurisdiction: Structure and sources. In International 

criminal jurisdiction (pp. 59–138). Oxford University Press. 

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199941476.003.0002 

Ghimire, K. (2023). Cyber-attack issues: Laws & policies and the role of librarians. Access: An International Journal of 

Nepal Library Association, 2(01), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.3126/access.v2i01.59002 

Greiman, V. A. (2022). Cyber law and regulation. In M. Lehto & P. Neittaanmäki (Eds.), Cyber security (pp. 59–78). 

Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91293-2_3 

Hummelholm, A. (2022). Future smart societies’ infrastructures and services in the cyber environments. In M. Lehto & P. 

Neittaanmäki (Eds.), Cyber security (pp. 151–182). Springer International Publishing. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91293-2_7 

Kagita, M. K., Thilakarathne, N., Gadekallu, T. R., Maddikunta, P. K. R., & Singh, S. (2021). A review on cyber crimes 

on the Internet of Things. In A. Makkar & N. Kumar (Eds.), Deep learning for security and privacy preservation 

in IoT (pp. 83–98). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6186-0_4 

Kelly, N., & Montasari, R. (2023). Police and cybercrime: Evaluating law enforcement’s cyber capacity and capability. In 

R. Montasari (Ed.), Applications for artificial intelligence and digital forensics in national security (pp. 91–103). 

Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40118-3_6 

Kethineni, S. (2020). Cybercrime in India: Laws, regulations, and enforcement mechanisms. In T. J. Holt & A. M. Bossler 

(Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of international cybercrime and cyberdeviance (pp. 305–326). Springer 

International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78440-3_7 

Khalymon, S., Puzyrov, M., & Prytula, A. (2019). Problems of implementation of whistleblower institution in Ukraine. 

Juridical Tribune Journal, 9(2), 436–454. Retrieved from 

https://www.tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An9v2/11.%20Khalymon,%20Puzyrov,%20Prytula.pdf 

Kozlovskyi, S., Kulinich, T., Mazur, H., Khadzhynov, I., & Kozlovskyi, V. (2023). Forecasting the competitiveness of the 

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429318726
https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v15.2(30).15


Warawa et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 11(1) (2026), 1-12

 

11 

agrarian sector of Ukraine in the conditions of war and European integration. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural 

Science, 29(5), 774–783. Retrieved from https://www.agrojournal.org/29/05-02.pdf 

Kravtsov, S., Orobets, K., Shyshpanova, N., Vovchenko, O., & Berezovska-Chmil, O. (2024). Progress and Challenges in 

Combating Corruption in Ukraine: Pathways Forward. Journal of Strategic Security, 17(2), 28–43. 

https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.17.2.2223 

Kuzior, A., Tiutiunyk, I., Zielińska, A., & Kelemen, R. (2024). Cybersecurity and cybercrime: Current trends and threats. 

Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2024/17-2/12 

Lavrov, R., Remnova, L., Sadchykova, I., Mazur, H., Tymoshenko, M., Kozlovskyi, V., & Kozlovskyi, S. (2022). 

Investments in the sustainable development of the potato sector in Ukraine based on the optimal balance of 

production and consumption. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 19, 186–196. 

https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2022.19.19 

Law of Ukraine No. 912-IX. (2020). “On the Basic Principles of Cybersecurity in Ukraine”. Retrieved from 

https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2163-19?lang=en#Text 

Li, Y., & Liu, Q. (2021). A comprehensive review study of cyber-attacks and cybersecurity: Emerging trends and recent 

developments. Energy Reports, 7, 8176–8186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.08.126 

Mezei, K., & Szentgáli-Tóth, B. (2023). Some comments on the legal regulation on misinformation and cyber attacks 

conducted through online platforms. LeXonomica, 15(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.18690/lexonomica.15.1.33-

52.2023 

Mezzetti, C., Muthukuda, K., & Yuan, H. (2024). Crime in the digital age: Do cyber attacks lead to identity theft? SSRN 

Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4807037 

Milon, N. U., Ghose, P., Pinky, T. C., Tabassum, N., Hasan, M. N., & Khatun, M. (2024). An in-depth PRISMA-based 

review of cybercrime in a developing economy: Examining sector-wide impacts, legal frameworks, and emerging 

trends in the digital era. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(4), 2072–2093. 

https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1583 

Muliarevych, O. (2024). Mitigating input prompt attack vulnerabilities in systems with a language model interface. In 2024 

14th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. 

https://doi.org/10.1109/dessert65323.2024.11122258 

Pasupuleti, M. K. (2024). Legal and regulatory frameworks for AI in cybersecurity: Strategies against threats and fraud. In 

AI-enabled security: Defending the digital realm against cyber threats and fraud (1st ed., pp. 1–18). National 

Education Services. https://doi.org/10.62311/nesx/97890 

Pettoello-Mantovani, C. (2024). Cybercrimes: An emerging category of offenses within the frame of the International 

Criminal Court jurisdiction. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 6(2), 06–11. 

https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2024.6.2.2 

Reva, M., & Demchenko, Y. (2024). The role of online psychological testing in a learning process: The Ukrainian case. E-

Learning Innovations Journal, 2(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.57125/ELIJ.2024.03.25.02 

Sarkar, G., & Shukla, S. K. (2024). Reconceptualizing online offenses: A framework for distinguishing cybercrime, 

cyberattacks, and cyberterrorism in the Indian legal context. Journal of Economic Criminology, 4, 100063. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100063 

Shevchuk, O., Lysodyed, O., Matyukhina, N., Babaieva, O., & Davydenko, S. (2023а). Conflict of interest in the activities 

of judges in Ukraine and the European Union: A comparative legal study. Juridical Tribune, 13(2). 

https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/2.06 

Shevchuk, O. M., Protsiuk, I. V., Samoshchenko, I. V., Panova, A. V., & Shaposhnyk, A. O. (2023b). The rights to access 

to information and national security in Ukraine in the system of human rights. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 34, 

257–282. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(34)2023.ic-13 

Simons, G., Danyk, Y., & Maliarchuk, T. (2020). Hybrid war and cyber-attacks: Creating legal and operational dilemmas. 

Global Change, Peace & Security, 32(3), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2020.1732899 

Snail ka Mtuze, S., & Musoni, M. (2023). An overview of cybercrime law in South Africa. International Cybersecurity 

Law Review, 4(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-023-00089-8 

Spassova, S. (2023). Disruptions of satellite communication: Comparing cyber attacks and harmful interference for the 

purposes of legal regulation. In Space law in a networked world (pp. 131–142). Brill | Nijhoff. 

https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004527270_006 

Sysoiev, D., Pidbereznykh, I., Mazur, H., Tellis, S., & Vandin, Y. (2024). Administrative law mechanisms for preventing 

and countering corruption in the field of territorial defence. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary 

Studies, 5(4), e24069. https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v5i4.859 

Tumalavičius, V. (2022). Legal challenges for blockchain projects and cryptocurrencies in the context of sustainable 

development: International virtual currency market and technology dynamics. Law, Business and Sustainability 

Herald, 2(3), 27–41. Retrieved from https://lbsherald.org/index.php/journal/article/view/55 

Unified Register of Court Decisions. (2024). Search results in the Unified Register of Court Decisions (EUDRSR). 

Retrieved from https://court.opendatabot.ua/search?text=кіберзлочин&adjudication_date_year=2 

Verma, A., & Shri, C. (2022). Cyber security: A review of cyber crimes, security challenges and measures to control. 

Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective. Advance online publication. 

https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629221074760 

Vitvitskiy, S., Kurakin, O., Pokataev, P., Skriabin, O., & Sanakoiev, D. (2021). Formation of a new paradigm of anti-

money laundering: The experience of Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(1), 354–

https://www.agrojournal.org/29/05-02.pdf
https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.17.2.2223
https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2163-19?lang=en#Text
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4807037
https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1583
https://doi.org/10.1109/dessert65323.2024.11122258
https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/2.06
https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(34)2023.ic-13
https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629221074760


Warawa et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 11(1) (2026), 1-12

 

12 

363. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.30 

Watters, P. A. (2023). Cybercrime and cybersecurity (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003406730 

Wessel, R. A., & Heim, T. N. (2023). The various dimensions of cyberthreats: (In)consistencies in the global regulation of 

cybersecurity. Anales de Derecho, 40, 40–65. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesderecho.546921 

 
Publisher’s Note: CRIBFB stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. 

 

 
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee CRIBFB, USA. This open-access article is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons 

Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). 

Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research (P-ISSN 2687-850X   E-ISSN 2687-8518) by CRIBFB is licensed under a Creative 

Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 

https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.30
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

