BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH 9(4) (2024), 39-48 39 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH BJMSR VOL 9 NO 4 (2024) P-ISSN 2687-850X E-ISSN 2687-8518 Available online at https://www.cribfb.com Journal homepage: https://www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/BJMSR Published by CRIBFB, USA SUSTAINABLE ARCHITECTURE AND THE ROLE OF CYBER- PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS Sujin Butdisuwan (a) Saddam Hossain (b )1 Hanan Zaffar (c) Mohammad Amees (d) Md. Shariful Islam (e) (a) Assistant Professor, Faculty of Education, Shinawatra University, Thailand; E-mail: sujin.b@siu.ac.th (b) Assistant Librarian, J & V Resource Centre, Great Lakes Institute of Management, Chennai, India; E-mail: saddamhossain654@gmail.com (c) Assistant Professor, Jindal Institute of Behavioural Sciences, OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat, India; E-mail: hzaffar@jgu.edu.in (d) Assistant Librarian, Shiv Nadar School of Law, Shiv Nadar University, Chennai, India; E-mail: mohdamees@gmail.com (e) Professor, Department of Information Science and Library Management, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh; E-mail: sharif6islam@ru.ac.bd A R T I C L E I N F O Article History: Received: 6th June 2024 Reviewed & Revised: 6th June to 18th September 2024 Accepted: 20th September 2024 Published: 25th September 2024 Keywords: Cyber-Physical Systems, Architecture, Cyber and Physical Convergence, Robotics, Computer Networking, SDG9 (Innovation) JEL Classification Codes: Q01, Q56, C63 Peer-Review Model: External peer review was done through double-blind method. A B S T R A C T Cyber-Physical Systems are next-generation digital systems that focus on the intricate connections and integration between the physical and digital worlds. These systems have highly integrated physical, communication, control, and computing components. The study's purpose is to carry out a bibliometric analysis to explore the research trends, collaboration network, and thematic evaluation of papers on cyber-physical systems. The most prolific countries, authors, sources, highest citations received by authors, and co-occurrences in this research domain were identified. The bibliometric analysis method was employed to empirically analyze the research on CPS in architecture published between 2007 and 2022 in the Web of Science database. All retrieved records were initially filtered by excluding 364 non– non-peer-reviewed publications and another type of languages except English. After that, we excluded 8 records based on the criteria and scope, and again excluded records for duplicates 12 records. Finally, 1336 records met the eligibility criteria. The VOS viewer and biblioshiny software was used to construct the scientific maps. A total of 1336 publications were analyzed. The study results show that the highly cited papers have been published in 297 journals by 4520 authors from 1483 organizations in 83 countries. The most prolific journal was IEEE Access, with 104 publications, 3823 citations, and an h- index of 24. The number of documents progressively increased from 2010 to 2021. Further, 2009 has no publications, and the largest number of articles was published in 2021 (n=272). Furthermore, China led the way with the most publications, active organizations, prolific authors, and international collaborations. This is the first study to look at the global trends in research on CPS in architecture and provides valuable guidelines and motivations for further research. Future studies may also examine the main hazards connected with using cyber-physical systems to manage operations across various industries and sectors. © 2024 by the authors. Licensee CRIBFB, USA. This open-access article is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). INTRODUCTION Cyber-physical systems (CPS) are computer-aided systems that link physical reality activity to the computing and communication infrastructure (Alam & El Saddik, 2017). These systems follow the trend of having information and services available 24/7 in today’s highly networked world. The ability to communicate with the physical world and expand its capacity through calculation, communication, and control is an important enabler of future technological advances (Jazdi, 2014). Academics, businesses, and governments worldwide are all interested in CPS. The technology employed in these systems is based on the more established technology of embedded systems. Albeit still very new, this technology studies computers and software in objects like vehicles, toys, hospital instruments, and scientific equipment whose primary function is not computation. Through abstractions and modeling, design, and analytic approaches, CPS combines the dynamics of physical processes with those of software and networking. CPS can be used in various fields, such as architecture, intelligent transportation, agriculture, health, water, and aerospace. Therefore, service providers will likely focus on implementing CPS technologies in the future (Bagheri et al., 2015). Communication is required in CPS to transmit sensor monitoring data to regulators. Thus, communication is a crucial requirement for the functionality of architectural design systems. Lee et al. (2015) proposed the CPS 5C architecture to construct CPS. They suggested that a cyber-physical system should consist of five levels: smart connection, data-to-information conversion, cyber, cognition, and configuration. The 1Corresponding author: ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5397-5280 © 2024 by the authors. Hosting by CRIBFB. Peer review is the responsibility of CRIBFB, USA. https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v9i4.2246 To cite this article: Butdisuwan, S., Hossain, S., Zaffar, H., Amees, M., & Islam, M. S. (2024). SUSTAINABLE ARCHITECTURE AND THE ROLE OF CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 9(4), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v9i4.2246 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) https://www.openaccess.nl/en https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v9i4.2246 https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3551-1865 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5397-5280 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9444-8276 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8944-2926 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6170-084X Butdisuwan et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 9(4) (2024), 39-48 40 first step in creating a CPS application is gathering accurate and consistent data from devices and their parts. Sensors can gather data directly or via interfaces with business production systems. Afterwards, converting this data into relevant and predictive information, such as health and remaining usable life values, is critical in machine prognostics and health management (Lee, Ardakani et al., 2015). The cyber layer serves as the main information hub, combining information from equipment that are connected to create a vast network. As we move forward, the cognitive level of CPS implementation yields a deep comprehension of the system under observation, enabling knowledgeable decision-making via knowledgeable user interfaces. Lastly, feedback from cyberspace to physical space provides supervisory authority, allowing devices to self- configure and adjust for optimal efficiency (Yao et al., 2019). Figure 1. CPS architecture A bibliometric analysis is used to identify research gaps in the field of sustainable architecture and CPS. The results provide a number of promising directions for future research. The socioeconomic effects of integrating CPS in sustainable building designs, such as how these technologies might be made accessible and inexpensive for various groups, are the subject of little research. Moreover, there is a dearth of multidisciplinary collaboration among computer scientists, engineers, and architects, indicating the need for more integrated design and implementation methods. Finally, long-term case studies evaluating CPS's environmental effects and effectiveness in sustainable architecture are limited, showing a need for more empirical evidence to validate theoretical models. This study seeks to examine the present state of CPS in architecture research. The following research questions have been addressed in this study:  Which countries have the highest number of publications?  Which sources/journals have the highest number of publications?  Who are the authors who have the highest citations received in the field? The study has the following sections: Section 2 discusses Literature reviews, Section 3 outlines the research methodology, Section 4 provides findings and analysis, Section 5 addresses the importance of CPS in architecture, Section 6 discusses the study, and Section 7 discloses the conclusion. LITERATURE REVIEW CPS models for architecture have given rise to various initiatives to establish CPS projects in a factory setting. The current industrial CPS efforts have been thoroughly reviewed to identify their shortcomings, potential fixes, and recommendations. The 5C Architecture was the first CPS architecture widely used in industrial applications and was developed in 2013 (Ahmadi et al., 2017).In architecture, CPS integrate physical elements with computational algorithms to create smart environments that improve building sustainability, safety, and efficiency (Bonci et al., 2019; Darwish & Hassanien, 2018; Kalluri et al., 2021). Research has demonstrated that CPS can improve occupant satisfaction by modifying environmental conditions according to users' preferences (Stamatescu et al., 2016; Schmidt et al., 2017) and optimize resource allocation based on real-time data (Agostinelli et al., 2021; Ane et al., 2023; Barroso et al., 2023), both of which can result in a large reduction in usage of energy. Implementing CPS in architecture also presents issues that must be addressed, including security and privacy concerns due to the large volume of data collected (Giraldo et al., 2017; Fink et al., 2017; Ane et al., 2020; Chong et al., 2019). Moreover, many obstacles remain to overcome before various systems and standards can function together seamlessly, frequently calling for specialized solutions (Givehchi et al., 2017; Kunold et al., 2019). Notwithstanding these difficulties, CPS in architecture has indisputable advantages, improving building performance and opening the door to new business models like energy-as-a-service and predictive maintenance (Correa, 2018; Banerjee & Nayaka, 2022). The necessity of cross-disciplinary collaboration is emphasized by research that is still focused on creating standardized protocols and frameworks to facilitate the wider use of CPS in architecture (Vogel-Heuser et al., 2020; Mizutani et al., 2021); Horváth, 2023). Butdisuwan et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 9(4) (2024), 39-48 41 Using AI and machine learning to create adaptive educational environments that change based on past data and user behaviour is one of the emerging themes in CPS architecture (Radanliev et al., 2021). Building more effective and individualized management systems that can change the environment without human involvement may result from this strategy. Furthermore, by integrating renewable energy sources and encouraging resource efficiency, CPS can support sustainable urban development (Shih et al., 2016; Kleissl & Agarwal, 2010). The architectural sector is well-positioned to gain from technological breakthroughs as they happen, leading to the creation of built environments that are more intelligent, robust, and sustainable (Bakakeu et al., 2017; Akanmu & Anumba, 2015; Bonci et al., 2019). MATERIALS AND METHODS Database Selection This study conducted a scientometric/bibliometric analysis of the literature on CPS in architecture. Bibliometric/scientometric analysis has been frequently used to refine prominent research and identify trends using quantitative analysis. In this research, various performance indicators were extracted, and the most active countries, prolific sources, highest citations received by authors, and co-occurrences were identified in the relevant literature (Hossain & Batcha, 2021). The Web of Science (WoS) database was used to retrieve raw data related to CPS in architecture. 'Cyber-physical systems' and 'architecture' were the two main keywords selected and used to search in the title, abstract, and keywords for the WoS database documents fields. According to the initial results, 1720 papers published between 2007 and 2022 were identified. These results include information regarding the title, author names and affiliations, citations, abstracts, keywords, and references related to the publications. They were all saved in plain text format. Microsoft Excel was used to create statistics about the evolution of the topics over time, the journals or conference proceedings, citations, keywords, authors, and geographical distribution of the studies in terms of software packages. Documents Eligibility The PRISMA method identifies and evaluates research studies relevant to a particular research question or topic. In the context of CPS in architecture, a bibliometric analysis using the PRISMA method would involve a systematic search of relevant databases, such as WoS, to identify relevant articles once they have been identified, screened, and evaluated for relevance based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria (Hossain et al., 2022). Figure 2. Detail flowchart illustrating the PRISMA on CPS in architecture research As shown in Figure 2, the researchers followed the PRISMA meta-analysis steps on EMRs research, which includes four steps: (a) identification as recording identified through database searching, (b) screening the record documents, (c) eligibility records, and (d) selecting studies, as follows:  Empirical articles published between 2007 and 2022 were included.  We excluded other documents (e.g., conference papers and review papers).  We excluded duplicate records. Software In total, 1720 documents were obtained from the WoS database on April 20, 2022. These retrieved records were initially filtered by excluding 364 non–non-peer-reviewed publications and another type of languages except English. After that, we excluded 8 records based on the criteria and scope and again excluded records for duplicate 12 records. Finally, 1336 records Butdisuwan et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 9(4) (2024), 39-48 42 met the eligibility criteria. Thus, in the "included" phase, the number of records included in the meta-analysis is presented. The VOS viewer (Van Eck & Waltman, 2011) and Bibliometrix tools (Aria & Cuccurullo, 2017) allowed for a more in- depth examination of citations and co-author relationships and were also applied to the data. RESULTS Country Collaboration Table 1 shows that authors from 83 countries contributed to the literature on CPS in architecture from 2007 to 2022 and published 1336 papers. The authors' country of employment during research, which can be different from their country of birth or citizenship, was considered for this analysis. From a geographic standpoint, the highest contributions were from China (826), the USA (538), Germany (186), Spain (175), and the UK (167), as shown in Table 1. Furthermore, only three developing countries, India, Brazil, and Pakistan, were identified as some of the 20 most productive countries. Figure 3 depicts the collaboration between countries based on co-authorships using the VOS viewer tool. For this purpose, the minimum number of publications was set as five documents per country and a minimum number of ten citations. Table 1. Country collaboration on CPS in architecture research Rank Country Frequency Rank Country Frequency 1 China 826 11 France 74 2 USA 538 12 Sweden 73 3 Germany 186 13 Saudi Arabia 56 4 Spain 175 14 Brazil 53 5 UK 167 15 Portugal 51 6 India 150 16 Pakistan 50 7 Italy 132 17 Greece 47 8 South Korea 122 18 Japan 44 9 Australia 82 19 Finland 38 10 Canada 74 20 Netherlands 33 Figure 3. Map of top 20 countries’ collaborations Figure 4. Co-authorship analysis of countries using VOS viewer China 826 UK 167 Spain 175 USA 538 Germany 186 Butdisuwan et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 9(4) (2024), 39-48 43 In Figure 4, the strength of global cooperation is represented by the line thickness between countries (Jeong & Koo, 2016). The size of the circle denotes the scope of global cooperation. Of the 83 countries, 51 met the threshold for the country, as shown in Figure 2. The map has six country clusters, 432 links, and a total link strength of 1141. It also shows that China and the USA had the most paper collaborations in the CPS in architecture research. Institution’s Collaboration in the World As shown in Table 2, the South China University of Technology (China) published the most articles on CPS in architecture, followed by the King Saud University, KSA, and the Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China. It can be seen that in the top 10 worldwide institutions with the most CPS in architecture publications, both private and public institutions are highly represented. However, the public institutions were more prolific than their private counterparts. Furthermore, public institutions like the South China University of Technology and King Saud University produced a substantially higher number of articles than others. Only one private university, Northeastern University, USA, made it to the top 10 universities list by publishing 18 articles. Table 2. The top institution articles contributing to the world Rank Affiliation Articles Nation Ownership Discipline 1 South China University of Technology 28 China Public Engineering 2 King Saud University 25 Saudi Public Multidisciplinary 3 Shanghai Jiao Tong University 25 China Public Multidisciplinary 4 Polytechnic University of Madrid 25 Spain Public Multidisciplinary 5 Huazhong University of Science and Technology 21 China Public Engineering/Medical 6 Technical University of Munich 20 Singapore Public Multidisciplinary 7 Zhejiang University 20 China Public Multidisciplinary 8 South China University of Technology 19 China Public Multidisciplinary 9 Northeastern University 18 USA Private Multidisciplinary 10 Tsinghua University 18 China Public Multidisciplinary Evolution of Scientific Production The evolution of the number of articles related to CPS in architecture between 2007 and 2022 is shown in Figure 5. The first article was published in the Web of Science database in 2007 and was entitled "Hyperion-Next-Generation Battlespace Information Services". It can be seen that from 2007 to 2022, the number of documents progressively increased from 2010 to 2021. Further, 2009 has no publications, and the largest number of articles was published in 2021 (n=272). Figure 5. Quantity of papers by year Author’s Keyword Analysis Co-word analysis identifies the relationships between concepts (words or topics) that appear in the same document title, keywords, or abstract (Liu et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2024). As a result of the co-occurrence of keyword analysis, VOSviewer was used to identify the most frequently used keywords in the 1336 documents in the sample. Figure 6. Density visualization of author keywords using VOS viewer. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 1 2 0 1 8 19 29 27 53 89 109 196 226 242 272 62 A rt ic le s Year Butdisuwan et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 9(4) (2024), 39-48 44 The minimum number of occurrences of an author keyword was 10. A total of 4329 keywords met the threshold and are shown as 5 clusters in the map exported from the VOS viewer. In Figure 6, the font size of the keyword indicates the frequency of use of the keyword. The most frequently used keyword was ‘cyber-physical systems’ with 281 occurrences, followed by ‘internet of t with 116 occurrences, and ‘cyber-physical system’ with 93 occurrences. Most Citations Received by Authors Table 3 presents the list of authors most frequently cited by research articles on CPS in architecture published during the study period. Wan JF, Li D, and Wang SY were the most cited, with 716 citations. These authors have discussed implementing smart factories in the industry. Wan JF, Li D, Wang SY, and Zhang DQ claimed the second-highest number of citations received for their article entitled ‘Towards Smart Factory for Industry 4.0: A Self-Organized Multi-Agent System with Big Data Based Feedback and Coordination’. Table 3. Most citations received things by authors Rank Author Sources DOI Citations 1 Wan JF International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 10.1155/2016/3159805 716 2 Li D International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 10.1155/2016/3159805 716 3 Wang SY International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 10.1155/2016/3159805 716 4 Wan JF Computer Networks 10.1016/j.comnet.2015.12.017 559 5 Li D Computer Networks 10.1016/j.comnet.2015.12.017 559 6 Wang SY Computer Networks 10.1016/j.comnet.2015.12.017 559 7 Zhang DQ Computer Networks 10.1016/j.comnet.2015.12.017 559 8 Wan JF IEEE Sensors Journal 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2565621 365 9 Li D IEEE Sensors Journal 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2565621 365 10 Wang SY IEEE Sensors Journal 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2565621 365 Sources Impact Table 4 shows that the 1336 documents were published in 297 journals. The IEEE Access has been the most productive journal with 104 published papers, followed by the Sensors with 66 papers, and the IEEE Internet of Things Journal with 40 papers published. The impact factor values of the Proceedings of the IEEE and IEEE Internet of Things Journal are among the highest. Table 4 also shows the number of citations the articles published in the most popular journals received. It can be seen that IEEE Access received the most citations. Furthermore, the eight journals were in the first quartile. Table 4. Sources’ impact on CPS in architecture Rank Element Papers Citation h-index Impact Factor Quartile Pub. Year 1 IEEE Access 104 3823 24 4.48 2 2015 2 Sensors 66 922 16 10.2 1 2008 3 IEEE Internet of Things Journal 40 2238 13 12.37 1 2014 4 Future Generation Computer Systems-The International Journal of Science 38 1227 17 9.11 1 2016 5 IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 37 1468 20 11.22 1 2010 6 Journal of Manufacturing Systems 26 1087 15 10.88 1 2015 7 Applied Sciences-Basel 23 100 5 2.679 3 2017 8 Proceedings of the IEEE 20 1127 13 45.17 1 2012 9 International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 19 306 10 3.55 1 2016 10 International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 19 361 14 3.7 1 2017 The Hirsch index (also known as the h-index) is a metric used to assess educational institutions' and researchers' influence and performance. If h papers out of a scientist's total number of papers have at minimum h citations each, and his or her remaining papers have been cited no more than h times every, the scientist has an h-index (Engqvist & Frommen, 2008). The Hirsch index concurrently determines the effectiveness and long-term significance of the research. The journal of IEEE Access had the highest number of citations (n=3823) and had an h-index of 24. As seen in Figure 7, based on the top 10 sources, IEEE Access Sources published the maximum number of articles from 2007 to 2021, followed by Sensors and IEEE Internet of Things Journal. Most documents were published in 2021 from all top 10 sources. Figure 7. Annual output of sources (top 10) from 2007 to 2022 Butdisuwan et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 9(4) (2024), 39-48 45 Importance of CPS in Architecture The importance of CPS in architecture lies in its ability to enhance the performance, efficiency, and sustainability of buildings while improving the safety, comfort, and satisfaction of building occupants. As such, the integration of CPS is becoming increasingly critical in the design, construction, and management of facilities in the 21st century (Monostori et al., 2016; S. Wang et al., 2016). CPS has become increasingly important in the field of architecture due to the numerous benefits they offer, including: Improved Efficiency CPS can help improve buildings' efficiency by optimizing energy usage, reducing waste, and improving the management of building systems. This can lead to lower energy bills, reduced carbon footprints, and increased sustainability. Enhanced Safety and Security CPS can help improve building safety and security by monitoring the health of the building's structure, detecting potential hazards, and providing real-time alerts in emergencies. This can help prevent accidents, reduce damage, and save lives. Improved User Experience CPS can help create more user-friendly buildings by providing personalized experiences, adapting to user preferences, and providing real-time feedback. This can help enhance building occupants' comfort, productivity, and satisfaction (Kang et al., 2016). Better Building Management CPS can help improve the management of buildings by providing real-time data on building performance, enabling predictive maintenance, and facilitating remote monitoring and control. This can reduce costs, increase efficiency, and improve the overall performance of buildings (L. Wang et al., 2015). Future-Proofing CPS can help future-proof buildings by enabling them to adapt to changing user needs, environmental conditions, and technological advancements. This can help ensure that buildings remain relevant, sustainable, and efficient over the long term (Gerostathopoulos et al., 2016). DISCUSSIONS The present study presents the global status and trends in the literature on CPS in architecture. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on data extracted from the Web of Science database to identify the most prolific authors, sources, and countries active in the research area. VOS viewer software was used for graphical analysis and mapping of the clusters of countries and author keywords. The study results have identified China as the country leading in this research domain. Although there was a disparity between China's academic impact, quality, and the number of publications, China has been working hard to become a valuable contributor with outstanding research institutions such as the South China University of Technology and Shanghai Jiao Tong University. This work presents the notion of cyber-physical systems and a model architecture. It argues that this definition and architecture not only satisfy every aspect of the CPS currently recognized but also unite the machine-only and human-only computation models currently in use (Khaitan & McCalley, 2014; Sony, 2020). To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first bibliometric study in the field of CPS in architecture. Our findings provide a foundation for scholars and policymakers to recognize the bibliometric indicators used in this study as indicators of research performance in CPS to inform future policies and funding decisions (Cardin, 2019). Finally, our research has revealed that bibliometric analysis is an effective method for mapping published literature on a specific topic and identifying research gaps in that field. This study provides valuable insights into the literature on CPS in architecture. Cyber physical systems will exist in all industrial sectors, such as telecommunications and within the fourth industrial revolution (Panetto et al., 2019). Innovative production techniques will be made possible by CPSs, which will eventually become the norm in the sector (Wan et al., 2014). Improved agility, mobility, and affordability will result from self-configuring, self-adjusting, and self- optimizing output settings (Babiceanu & Seker, 2016). Every operational component of manufacturing, from design to manufacturing to supply chains to customer service and support, will be impacted (Alam & El Saddik, 2017). CONCLUSIONS The comprehensive systematic examination and analysis of sustainable architecture and the Role of Cyber-Physical Systems exposes a diverse landscape in which incorporating technology into architectural practices has enormous potential for increasing sustainability. The review of current research emphasizes CPS's vital role in addressing environmental issues, resource efficiency, and overall building performance. The review focuses on CPS' revolutionary potential in developing Sustainable Architecture. The convergence of technology and environmental consciousness provides a path for constructing smarter, more resilient, and environmentally friendly constructed environments. Research projects in the future might analyze real-world difficulties in industrial operations and suggest strategies to work with CPS in architecture. Future studies may also examine the main hazards connected with using cyber-physical systems to manage operations across various industries and sectors (Wan et al., 2014). Both scholars and practitioners can benefit from in-depth reporting on real case studies. Butdisuwan et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 9(4) (2024), 39-48 46 Author Contributions: Conceptualization, S.B and S.H.; Methodology, S.H and M.A; Software, H.Z and S.B.; Validation, S.H.; Formal Analysis, S.H., and M.A.; Investigation, M.S.I.; Resources, M.S.I.; Data Curation, H.Z.; Writing –Original Draft Preparation, S.H.; Writing –Review & Editing, M.A. and M.S.I.; Visualization, S.H., Supervision, M.S.I.; and S.H. Authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Institutional Review Board Statement: Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to that the research does not deal with vulnerable groups or sensitive issues. Funding: The authors received no funding for this research. Acknowledgements: It is an acknowledgement that all the authors contributed equally. Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. REFERENCES Agostinelli, S., Cumo, F., Guidi, G., & Tomazzoli, C. (2021). Cyber-physical systems improving building energy management: Digital twin and artificial intelligence. Energies, 14(8), 2338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082338 Ahmadi, A., Cherifi, C., Cheutet, V., & Ouzrout, Y. (2017). A review of CPS 5 components architecture for manufacturing based on standards. 2017 11th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SKIMA.2017.8294091 Ane, T., Nepa, T., & Khan, M. R. (2023). Smart and Intelligent Production Strategy for the Flower Market Using Data Mining Knowledge-Based Decision. Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 7(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v7i1.2110 Akanmu, A., & Anumba, C. J. (2015). Cyber-physical systems integration of building inf ormation models and the physical construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(5), 516–535. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2014-0097 Alam, K. M., & El Saddik, A. (2017). C2PS: A digital twin architecture reference model for the cloud-based cyber-physical systems. IEEE Access, 5, 2050–2062. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2657006 Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 Ane, T., Billah, M., & Nepa, T. (2020). Performance of Internet of Things (IoT) Potential Applications in Education. Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 2(2), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v2i2.653 Ane, T., Nepa, T., & Khan, M. R. (2023). IOT Sensor Technology and Cloud Application on Farming Practice: Plant Live Data Monitor in Agriculture. Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 8(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v8i1.2129 Babiceanu, R. F., & Seker, R. (2016). Big Data and virtualization for manufacturing cyber-physical systems: A survey of the current status and future outlook. Computers in Industry, 81, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.02.004 Bagheri, B., Yang, S., Kao, H. A., & Lee, J. (2015). Cyber-physical systems architecture for self-aware machines in industry 4.0 environment. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 1622–1627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.318 Bakakeu, J., Schäfer, F., Bauer, J., Michl, M., & Franke, J. (2017). Building cyber‐physical systems–a smart building use case. Smart Cities: Foundations, Principles, and Applications, 605–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119226444.ch21 Banerjee, A., & Nayaka, R. R. (2022). A comprehensive overview on BIM-integrated cyber physical system architectures and practices in the architecture, engineering and construction industry. Construction Innovation, 22(4), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-02-2021-0029 Barroso, S., Bustos, P., & Núñez, P. (2023). Towards a cyber-physical system for sustainable and smart building: a use case for optimising water consumption on a smartcampus. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(5), 6379–6399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03656-1 Bonci, A., Carbonari, A., Cucchiarelli, A., Messi, L., Pirani, M., & Vaccarini, M. (2019). A cyber-physical system approach for building efficiency monitoring. Automation in Construction, 102, 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.010 Cardin, O. (2019). Classification of cyber-physical production systems applications: Proposition of an analysis framework. Computers in Industry, 104, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.10.002 Chong, M. S., Sandberg, H., & Teixeira, A. M. H. (2019). A tutorial introduction to security and privacy for cyber-physical systems. 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC), 968–978. https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.2019.8795652 Correa, F. R. (2018). Cyber-physical systems for construction industry. 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS), 392–397. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPHYS.2018.8387690 Darwish, A., & Hassanien, A. E. (2018). Cyber physical systems design, methodology, and integration: the current status and future outlook. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 9(5), 1541–1556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0575-4 Engqvist, L., & Frommen, J. G. (2008). The h-index and self-citations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(5), 250–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.009 Fink, G. A., Edgar, T. W., Rice, T. R., MacDonald, D. G., & Crawford, C. E. (2017). Security and privacy in cyber-physical systems. Cyber-physical systems, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803801-7.00009-2 Gerostathopoulos, I., Bures, T., Hnetynka, P., Keznikl, J., Kit, M., Plasil, F., & Plouzeau, N. (2016). Self-adaptation in software-intensive cyber–physical systems: From system goals to architecture configurations. Journal of Systems Butdisuwan et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 9(4) (2024), 39-48 47 and Software, 122, 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.028 Giraldo, J., Sarkar, E., Cardenas, A. A., Maniatakos, M., & Kantarcioglu, M. (2017). Security and privacy in cyber-physical systems: A survey of surveys. IEEE Design & Test, 34(4), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MDAT.2017.2709310 Givehchi, O., Landsdorf, K., Simoens, P., & Colombo, A. W. (2017). Interoperability for industrial cyber-physical systems: An approach for legacy systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(6), 3370–3378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2740434 Horváth, I. (2023). Framing supradisciplinary research for intellectualized cyber-physical systems: An unfinished story. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 23(6), 60802. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062327 Hossain, S., & Batcha, M. S. (2021). Scientometric analysis of research productivity from Indian dialysis over the last twenty years in Web of Science. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 15(2), 323– 339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.2005455 Hossain, S., Batcha, M. S., Atoum, I., Ahmad, N., & Al-Shehri, A. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Research on Sustainability in the Impact of Social Media on Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(24), 16388. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su142416388 Jazdi, N. (2014). Cyber physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/AQTR.2014.6857843 Jeong, D., & Koo, Y. (2016). Analysis of Trend and Convergence for Science and Technology using the VOSviewer. International Journal of Contents, 12(3), 54–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2016.12.3.054 Kalluri, B., Chronopoulos, C., & Kozine, I. (2021). The concept of smartness in cyber–physical systems and connection to urban environment. Annual Reviews in Control, 51, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.10.009 Kang, H. S., Lee, J. Y., Choi, S., Kim, H., Park, J. H., Son, J. Y., Kim, B. H., & Noh, S. D. (2016). Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 3, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-016-0015-5 Khaitan, S. K., & McCalley, J. D. (2014). Design techniques and applications of cyberphysical systems: A survey. IEEE Systems Journal, 9(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2014.2322503 Kleissl, J., & Agarwal, Y. (2010). Cyber-physical energy systems: Focus on smart buildings. Proceedings of the 47th Design Automation Conference, 749–754. https://doi.org/10.1145/1837274.1837464 Kunold, I., Wöhrle, H., Kuller, M., Karaoglan, N., Kohlmorgen, F., & Bauer, J. (2019). Semantic interoperability in cyber- physical systems. 2019 10th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS), 2, 797–801. https://doi.org/10.1109/IDAACS.2019.8924274 Lee, J., Ardakani, H. D., Yang, S., & Bagheri, B. (2015). Industrial big data analytics and cyber-physical systems for future maintenance & service innovation. Procedia Cirp, 38, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.026 Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 Liu, X., Wider, W., Fauzi, M. A., Jiang, L., Udang, L. N., & Hossain, S. F. A. (2024). The evolution of smart hotels: A bibliometric review of the past, present and future trends. Heliyon, 10(4) e26472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26472 Mizutani, I., Ramanathan, G., & Mayer, S. (2021). Integrating multi-disciplinary offline and online engineering in industrial cyber-physical systems through DevOps. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Internet of Things, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494322.3494328 Monostori, L., Kádár, B., Bauernhansl, T., Kondoh, S., Kumara, S., Reinhart, G., Sauer, O., Schuh, G., Sihn, W., & Ueda, K. (2016). Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Cirp Annals, 65(2), 621–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.005 Panetto, H., Iung, B., Ivanov, D., Weichhart, G., & Wang, X. (2019). Challenges for the cyber-physical manufacturing enterprises of the future. Annual Reviews in Control, 47, 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.02.002 Radanliev, P., De Roure, D., Van Kleek, M., Santos, O., & Ani, U. (2021). Artificial intelligence in cyber physical systems. AI & Society, 36, 783–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01049-0 Schmidt, M., Moreno, M. V., Schülke, A., Macek, K., Mařík, K., & Pastor, A. G. (2017). Optimizing legacy building operation: The evolution into data-driven predictive cyber-physical systems. Energy and Buildings, 148, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.002 Shih, C., Chou, J., Reijers, N., & Kuo, T. (2016). Designing CPS/IoT applications for smart buildings and cities. IET Cyber‐ Physical Systems: Theory & Applications, 1(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cps.2016.0025 Sony, M. (2020). Design of cyber physical system architecture for industry 4.0 through lean six sigma: Conceptual foundations and research issues. Production & Manufacturing Research, 8(1), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2020.1774814 Stamatescu, G., Stamatescu, I., Arghira, N., Calofir, V., & Fagarasan, I. (2016). Building cyber-physical energy systems. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1605.06903. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.06903 Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1109.2058. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1109.2058 Vogel-Heuser, B., Böhm, M., Brodeck, F., Kugler, K., Maasen, S., Pantförder, D., Zou, M., Buchholz, J., Bauer, H., & Brandl, F. (2020). Interdisciplinary engineering of cyber-physical production systems: highlighting the benefits of a combined interdisciplinary modelling approach on the basis of an industrial case. Design Science, 6, e5. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.2 Butdisuwan et al., Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 9(4) (2024), 39-48 48 Wan, J., Zhang, D., Zhao, S., Yang, L. T., & Lloret, J. (2014). Context-aware vehicular cyber-physical systems with cloud support: architecture, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(8), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2014.6871677 Wang, L., Törngren, M., & Onori, M. (2015). Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.04.008 Wang, S., Wan, J., Zhang, D., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016). Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi- agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Computer Networks, 101, 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2015.12.017 Xu, J., Liu, Q., Wider, W., Zhang, S., Fauzi, M. A., Jiang, L., Udang, L. N., & An, Z. (2024). Research landscape of energy transition and green finance: A bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 10(3), e24783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24783innov Yao, X., Zhou, J., Lin, Y., Li, Y., Yu, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Smart manufacturing based on cyber-physical systems and beyond. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30, 2805–2817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1384-5 Publisher’s Note: CRIBFB stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. © 2024 by the authors. Licensee CRIBFB, USA. This open-access article is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research (P-ISSN 2687-850X E-ISSN 2687-8518) by CRIBFB is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/