The Therapeutic Potential of Synthetic and Natural Cannabinoids in Treating Alzheimer’s Disease - Front Page Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine Correspondence nidhirkan@gmail.com Keywords Alzheimer's disease Amyloid-beta Cannabinoids Tau Protein Hyperphosphorylation ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol Submitted June 28, 2021 Accepted July 6, 2021 Published December 17, 2021 Full Open Access Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 Abstract Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most prevalent and debilitating neurodegenerative diseases in the world, highlighting the need for research on novel treatments and therapies. Previous studies have found that the body’s endocannabinoid system (ECS) interacts closely with its neural system, making it a potential avenue for the treatment of neurological disorders. One hallmark of AD is the accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) in the brain and its potentially detrimental effects on cognitive function. Cannabis-based drugs have been observed to regulate Aβ modifications and inhibit AD progression. Furthermore, cannabinoids have been noted to reduce inflammation and neurotoxicity. Synthetic cannabinoids were able to rescue memory deficits and neurodegeneration, and reduce immunoreactivity. Similarly, natural cannabinoids like ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) demonstrate therapeutic potential by interacting with the cholinergic system, and reversing the symptoms of AD. Although further research and testing are needed, it is evident that the use of cannabinoids shows promise for future treatment in AD patients. The Therapeutic Potential of Synthetic and Natural Cannabinoids in Treating Alzheimer’s Disease By: Nidhi Kanchumarthi, Avigail Rockland, Thejaswini Vembar, Elaine Liu, Rithvik Kanaad, Erick Torres Hinojosa, Kira Tiv, Benjamin Chen, Shira Hao, Sri Guttikonda, and Ramiro Garza I. Introduction Previous studies have concluded that the endocannabinoid system (ECS) is disrupted by many neurodegenerative disorders (Di Marzo et al., 2015; Fagan, 2014; Paloczi et al., 2018). The goal of this paper is to comprehensively review and outline the most recent data around the pathophysiology of the ECS as it relates to Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), as well as to investigate the e�cacy of natural and synthetic cannabinoids as a therapeutic option. Even as medicine advances and life expectancy increases, AD is still a prevalent issue. With increased prevalence comes the need for new and e�ective therapies. The endocannabinoid system shows promise, serving as both a neuromodulator and immunomodulator. Cannabis sativa has been studied for its potential neuroprotective qualities and its role in attenuating nociception in several medical contexts, including cancer, psychiatric disorders, and epilepsy. Its primary active components, ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), interact with the endocannabinoid signaling system through the endocannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. Stimulation of these receptors by various agonists has also successfully reduced the chronic neuroin�ammation associated with AD by interfering with the di�erent neural pathways. Our goal has been to identify the mechanisms by which the reduction in neuroin�ammation is accomplished. Accumulation of Aβ peptide and hyperphosphorylated tau protein in the brain play an important role in the onset and progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Farkhondeh et al., 2020). However, recent research has suggested that Aβ is no longer considered the primary cause, which was the accepted belief for many years (Cubinkova et al., 2018). Nevertheless, the ECS o�ers many therapeutic possibilities for targeting these Aβ deposits. Many studies support the �nding that elevated levels of the endocannabinoid 2AG, coupled with the modulation of the common cannabinoid receptor CB2, could reduce Aβ plaque accumulation (Paloczi, 2018). While Aβ may not be the primary cause of AD, studies have shown that these deposits are detrimental to healthy synapses (Shankar et al., 2008), decreasing long-term potentiation and increasing long-term depression. Sometimes, this neural damage is permanent, but the use of cannabinoids to stimulate the ECS has shown some success in preventing this kind of damage. Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 2 Pathology of the cholinergic system is also associated with AD and thus has been further investigated as a therapeutic target. Many cholinergic pathways function in conscious awareness, attention, and working memory, which are areas commonly found to be damaged or dysfunctional in those who su�er from AD. Research by K.J. Thompson suggests that interacting signals between the endocannabinoid and cholinergic systems may be a way to improve cholinergic signaling and repair synaptic plasticity that is damaged as a result of AD (Thompson et al., 2020). We then investigate the inhibitory activity of various receptor agonists of the ECS, both natural and synthetic. This section looks at CBD and THC as receptor agonists and concludes that CBD plays a role in the inhibition of neural apoptosis while THC is active in the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), which serves to improve the reduced cholinergic signalling associated with AD. Both agonists seem to play a part in the reduction of Aβ build-up, but the exact pathways still need to be elucidated. Some of the most e�ective and well-researched synthetic agonists of the ECS include Dronabinol, Nabilone, WIN55,212-2, and JWH-015. Dronabinol and Nabilone were found to be particularly e�ective in treating the neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) associated with AD, while the others primarily function in reducing Aβ plaques and neuroin�ammation. Our review presents published research that supports the e�cacy of both natural and synthetic cannabinoids as a potential treatment for AD. This introduces a potential bias, as studies which conclude positive results and relationships are more likely to be published than those with negative results. Nevertheless, this research highlights the potential bene�ts that cannabinoid therapy could provide and recommends that it be studied further. II. Neural Pathway A. Amyloidogenic Pathway Accumulation of Aβ peptide and hyperphosphorylated tau protein in the brain are the leading sources of the onset and progression of AD (Farkhondeh et al., 2020). When amyloid precursor protein (APP) is activated, it is cleaved by other proteins, which leads to the production of small Aβ fragments. This induces an increased production and aggregation of Aβ peptide in limbic and association cortices. As a result, the altered neuronal homeostasis and oxidative injury provoke neuro�brillary tangle formation. These tangles are a characteristic trait of AD brains and lead to Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 3 neuronal loss and cognitive impairment (Hall et al., 2001; Nelson et al., 2012). Fig. 1: The process of neuro�brillary tangle formation induced by amyloid plaque buildup. As the amyloid precursor protein (APP) is activated, amounts of Aβ are produced. This excess Aβ leads the neuro�brillary tangle formation, as seen in AD a�ected patients. CBD, a Cannabis derivative devoid of psychotropic e�ects, has been shown to interfere with several Aβ-triggered neurodegenerative pathways (Scuderi et al., 2014). Studies found that CBD led to the downregulation of genes linked to AD, including genes coding for the kinases responsible for tau phosphorylation and for the secretases involved in Aβ generation. Pre-treatment with CBD prevented the expression of proteins potentially involved in tau phosphorylation and Aβ production in gingiva-derived Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 4 mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) (Libroet al., 2016). In one study, the role of CBD was investigated as a modulating compound of APP processing in SHSY5Y(APP+) neurons. In addition, the putative involvement of PPARγ was explored as a candidate molecular site responsible for CBD actions. The results indicated that CBD is capable of inducing the ubiquitination —the degradation —of APP protein, leading to a decrease in APP full length protein levels in SHSY5Y(APP+) and a consequent decrease in Aβ production. CBD also promoted an increased survival of SHSY5Y(APP+) neurons by reducing their long-term apoptotic rate (Scuderi et al., 2014). In conclusion, research indicates that cannabis-based drugs inhibited the progression of AD by regulating Aβ modi�cations (Farkhondeh et al., 2020). While the aggregation of Aβ plaques has been the leading hypothesis in the onset ofAD for several years, recent research has suggested alternative hypotheses. A number of drugs targeting Aβ, such as Aducanumab — an antibody drug that binds to insoluble and soluble Aβ plaques to reduce its levels in the brain — were successful in slowing the rate of cognitive function decline in patients with mild AD, but not in treating the root cause. One hypothesis suggests that AD is a synaptic disease. It has been argued that synaptic impairment is an early event in neurodegenerative processes during AD and that synaptic loss and failure corresponds with cognitive decline in AD as well (Cubinkova et al., 2018). Recently, it was shown that impaired synapses in AD brains released tau protein in response to potassium chloride (KCl) stimulation, suggesting that it may be involved in the progression of tau in the brain (Cubinkovaet al., 2018). In addition to the synaptic hypothesis, some researchers believe that alpha-synuclein acts as a pathogenic modulator in AD. Alpha-synuclein is a protein that localizes to the nerve terminal and regulates neurotransmitter release in the presynaptic neuron. It was found that levels of soluble alpha-synuclein are about two-fold higher in the brains of AD patients than in control brains and correlate better with cognitive impairment (Cubinkova et al.,2018), suggesting that overexpression of the alpha-synuclein protein may play a role in the onset of AD. Even in light of these alternative hypotheses, most research focuses on the e�ects that cannabinoids have on the production of Aβ plaques as a measure of treating AD. Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 5 B. Endocannabinoid Signaling The endocannabinoid system regulates brain function as well as immune system activity, thus allowing it to serve as a therapeutic strategy for AD. Its dual ability as a neuromodulator and immunomodulator is due to the speci�c locations in which cannabinoid receptors type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2) gather (Bonnet & Marchant, 2015). The components of the endocannabinoid system primarily include two endocannabinoid signaling molecules, 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2AG) and anandamide (AEA), and their G-protein coupled receptors, cannabinoid receptor type 1 and cannabinoid receptor type 2 (Fagan & Campbell, 2014). The endocannabinoid system works speci�cally in both the regulation of neuroin�ammation as well as neurogenesis.Studies show that the endocannabinoid system is able to reduce chronic neuroin�ammation, a major mediator in neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients. PPAR𝛾 is a key component involved in the cannabinoid anti-in�ammatory e�ect. This protein consists of a group of hormone receptors involved in gene expression and in�ammation. The use of cannabinoids increases PPAR𝛾transcriptional activity in adult rats, thus decreasing neuroin�ammation (Fagan & Campbell, 2014). Fig. 2: Illustration and description of CB1 & CB2 receptors, and the endocannabinoid signaling molecules, anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2AG). An elevation of the 2AG endocannabinoid signaling molecule, coupled with a modulation of the CB2 speci�c cannabinoid receptor, could combat aggregated Aβ neuritic plaques (Palocziet al., 2018). The cannabinoid receptors play a vital role in allowing the formation of new neurons and neuronal connections to sustain neuronal function. The proliferation of neural precursor cells, both neural stem cells and neural progenitor cells, has been proven to activate CB1 receptors; the proliferation of neural Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 6 progenitor cells has been seen to activate both CB1 and CB2 receptors, allowing the production and survival of new neurons (Fagan & Campbell, 2014). This activation of neurogenesis o�ers promising potential within the endocannabinoid system in reducing brain atrophy in Alzheimer patients (Fagan & Campbell, 2014). A potential therapeutic component of the endocannabinoid system involves the cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2. CB1 receptors, the most abundant cannabinoid receptors,are mainly located in the neurons of the central nervous system and work to regulate cognition and memory, motor control, feeding, and pain perception — allowing the endocannabinoid system to serve as a neuromodulator. Studies on CB1 receptors have yielded inconsistent results,preventing a correlation between CB1 presence in AD patients and in control patients from being observed (Ahmad et al., 2014). A more recent study has indicated a reduction in the number of CB1 receptors in the frontal cortex while no change was observed in the hippocampus. CB2 receptors, on the other hand, are expressed mostly in immune cells and to some extent, in the peripheral system of the brain — allowing the endocannabinoid system to serve as an immunomodulator. As such, CB2 is highly involved in the research regarding the neuroin�ammatory response associated with AD (Atakan, 2012). Within the endocannabinoid system in an Alzheimer’s patient’s brain, studies found an increase in CB2 receptor expression in microglia, phagocytic cells in the brain and spinal cord. This increase correlates with Aβ levels and plaque accumulation, suggesting that the activation of CB2 receptors plays a role in stimulating Aβ removal (Talarico et al., 2019). The use of CB2 receptors has shown to be a promising medium for both a therapeutic treatment and as a marker for the advancement of Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, CB2 receptors have continuously been co-localized with Aβ plaque buildup (Ahmad et al., 2016). Despite this, there have been �ndings that demonstrated CB2 receptor concentration is highly expressed within microglia cells surrounding senile plaques — extracellular deposits of Aβ — within post-mortem brainsdiagnosed with AD (Aso & Ferrer, 2016). Conversely, studies demonstrated that CB2 receptors may not be the most accurate biomarker for tracking AD advancement, as they are also found on neuronal cells. However, this does not necessarily eliminate them as targets for treatment as they remain largely expressed within immune cells (Ahmad et al., 2016). As such, the signi�cant presence of CB2 receptors in microglia cells in brains of AD patients allows for selective activation(stimulating certain CB2 receptors to decrease in�ammatory cell generation) in a�ected Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 7 tissues,therefore decreasing the risk of harmful e�ects (Ramírez et al., 2005). Fig. 3: Illustration of the interaction between endocannabinoids and the cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2. Endocannabinoids from the postsynaptic neuron travel through the synaptic cleft to the presynaptic neuron, thus attaching to the Cannabinoid Type 1 receptor. The binding of these two molecules results in a suppression of neurotransmitters altering the neuronal �ring in the postsynaptic cell, thus allowing it to work as a regulator. One avenue of therapeutic treatment is the usage of CB2 activity against in�ammation. Within microglia cells, CB2 receptors inhibit neurotoxicity caused by microglia by substantially reducing the production of pro-in�ammatory molecules and by manipulating macrophage migration(Aso& Ferrer, 2016). "This was supported by experiments utilizing receptor agonists within in vitro experiments containing di�erent species of toxic Aβs, such as JWH-015, JWH-133, HU-308, WIN55,212-2, and HU-210, which observed a reduction of in�ammatory molecules” (Aso & Ferrer, 2016). It has been postulated that these CB2 receptor agonists aid in inhibiting microglial activation through decreasing intracellular calcium concentration (Martín-Moreno et al., 2011). In essence, the utilization and subsequent exploitation of the endocannabinoid system provides an essential medium for the therapeutic treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 8 The endocannabinoid system has shown to reduce in�ammatory response through thePPARγ protein as well as facilitate neurogenesis through the activation of both the cannabinoid receptors, when neural stem cells and neural progenitor cells are proliferated. The self-renewal capability and multipotency of stem cells is supported through the complex microenvironment provided through the action of the endocannabinoid system, speci�cally cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 (Rodrigues et al., 2019). The prospect of neural stem cells as regenerative therapies is very promising, leading to a possible personalized and e�ective approach (Rodrigueset al., 2019). Moreover, the various cannabinoid actions on neural stem cells open paths of research to uncover the mechanisms responsible behind cannabinoid e�ects. New avenues of research could provide new knowledge, leading to the development of re�ned therapeutic strategies to alleviate Alzheimer’s e�ects. C. Synaptic Plasticity Among the neural pathways negatively impacted by AD are those involved in synaptic plasticity. The brain’s circuitry is heavily a�ected by numerous daily activities ranging from learning new information to engaging in social interactions. These exposures to the environment have the potential to modify the brain’s neural organization and in�uence its activity. Synaptic plasticity is the phenomenon that describes these changes in the neural circuits’ structure and function, which result from modi�cations to synaptic transmission. Although synaptic plasticity may allow a damaged brain to restrengthen synaptic connections and reverse damage, AD is known to impair this plasticity and leave permanent damage. Research has demonstrated that Aβdeposition, a widely recognized hallmark of AD pathophysiology, is detrimental to healthy synapses (Shankar et al., 2008). Soluble dimeric Aβ assemblies were found to be strong inhibitors of long-term potentiation —the strengthening of synaptic communication by repeated stimulation (Shankar et al., 2008). The soluble Aβ assemblies were also found to augment long-term depression causing a decrease in dendritic spine density. Dendritic spine density has been found to strongly correlate to the degree of dementia for patients with AD. Speci�cally,the research showed that AD brain samples had a 47% decrease in spine density when compared to a control (Shankar et al., 2008). The researchers localized various receptors, includingN-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR), metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR), and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors(nAChR) as among those impacted by Aβ and negatively a�ecting Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 9 synaptic plasticity in diseased brains. Studies con�rmed that the introduction of soluble Aβ dimers into rats interrupted their ability to recall learned behaviors, further implicating Aβ as the primary culprit responsible for impaired synapse remodeling and plasticity (Shankar et al., 2008). Fig. 4: In a research study conducted by Hughes and Herron, e�ects of long-term potentiation (LTP) of CBD was investigated in the hippocampus. Treatment of slices with CBD attenuated the Aβ-mediated de�cit in LTP. LTP was signi�cantly attenuated in the presence of Aβ1–42 (500nM) (112.6±2.9%;n=23) compared to control (148.6±2.4%; n=59; AandC). B Application of CBD to slices 30 minutes prior to addition of Aβ attenuated theAβ-mediated de�cit in LTP (136.9±5.9%; n=15, p≤0.001) compared to Aβ alone. LTP in the presence of CBD and Aβ was similar to control (p>0.05). Citation: Cannabidiol reverses de�cits in hippocampal LTP in a model of Alzheimer’s disease. (n.d.). NeurochemicalResearch. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11064-018-2513-z Synaptic plasticity can be modulated through the interaction between CBD and the endocannabinoid system. While the exact mechanism must still be elucidated, it is clear that CBD in�uences and interacts with endocannabinoid receptors. Various studies have arrived at di�erent conclusions on the actions of CBD, some stating that there is no a�nity between CBD and the CB1/CB2 receptors (McPartland, 2007). Others state CBD binds as a weak antagonist (Thomas, 2007), and yet more that claim CBD functions as a negative allosteric modulator for the endocannabinoids 2-AG and delta-9-THC (Hughes et al., 2019). CBD enhances neuroprotection by di�erent signal transduction pathways that are controlled indirectly by cannabinoid receptors (Li et al., 2020). Similarly, CBD treatment enhanced synaptic transmission in mouse models, most likely acting in conjunction with CB1 and CB2 receptors to decrease neurotoxicity and cell death that was the result of Aβ deposits. CBD has shown its capability in reversing and preventing cognitive damage due to AD (Watt et al., 2017) and precluding the suppression of long-term Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 10 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11064-018-2513-z potentiation (Hughes et al., 2019). Therefore,modulation of the agonists and antagonists which bind to CB1 and CB2 receptors, such as CBD, has an e�ect on synaptic plasticity in the brain. AD-induced dysfunction of the endocannabinoid receptors negatively in�uences synaptic plasticity. Fig. 5: Illustration of synaptic plasticity and long-term potentiation. After repeated simulation and long-term potentiation, there is an increase in the number of neurotransmitters in the presynaptic neuron and an increase in the number of receptors in the postsynaptic neuron. This results in a stronger response. Pathology of the cholinergic system is also associated with AD. Many cholinergic pathways are commonly found to be damaged or dysfunctional in those who su�er from AD, impairing synaptic plasticity. AD has been correlated with decreased cholinergic transmission, especially in the hippocampus where new memories are formed. Studies have found ‘crosstalk’ — signals within one system that produce changes in another system — between the cholinergic signaling and the endocannabinoid signaling systems (Thompson et al., 2020). Past studies speci�cally investigated this communication between the systems in AD. This research found that α-7 nAChR are of particular concern because they are highly expressed in the hippocampus and play a signi�cant role in the development of memory and learning abilities (Thompson et al., 2020). Elevated levels of α-7 nAChR have been found to disrupt normal signaling and negatively impact synaptic plasticity (Thompson et al., 2020). Interestingly, Aβ deposition also seems to increase in α-7 nAChR rich regions (Thompson et al., 2020). While their research did not corroborate a de�nite ‘cross-talk’ between the ECS and α-7 nAChR speci�cally, they did �nd that α-5 nAChR and α-6 nAChR correlated to THC addiction and withdrawal (Thompson et al., 2020), which are known to involve the pathways of the Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 11 ECS. The researchers concluded that the ECS seemingly plays a role in cholinergic signaling, although not speci�c to the α-7 nAChR.This research suggests that indirect crosstalk between the endocannabinoid and cholinergic systems and its modulation may be a way to improve cholinergic signaling and repair synaptic plasticity that is damaged as a result of AD (Thompson et al., 2020). III. Receptor Agonists A. Inhibitory Activity by Receptor Agonists Many studies have investigated the variety of proposed therapeutic treatments mediated by endocannabinoid receptor agonists, speci�cally the inhibitory activity of receptor agonists in Alzheimer’s disease. One of the primary focuses of cannabinoid receptor agonists is their ability to inhibit neuroin�ammation, a speci�c characteristic signaled by the dysfunction of microglia. Cannabinoid agonists increase endocannabinoid availability, which allows activation of receptor agonists to prevent Aβ-induced cognitive de�cits (Martín-Moreno et al., 2011). The synthetic cannabinoid, WIN 5512-2, inhibits neuroin�ammation induced by Aβ through the CB1 and CB2 receptors. In primary cultures, a laboratory procedure in which cell extracts are grown under controlled conditions, WIN5512-2’s in�ammatory response speci�cally prevented cell death in astrocytes — specialized glial cells that aid in a variety of neurological functions such as water homeostasis and oxidative stress defense (Sofroniew, 2010). Mice studies have e�ectively demonstrated this by reducing the levels of the proin�ammatory molecules interleukin-1 beta (IL-1beta), TNF-alpha, COX-2, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (Aguirre-Rueda, 2015) within their system. Additionally, two proin�ammatory cytokines, TNF-alpha and IL-6, were measured in the cerebral cortex of mice treated with CBD and WIN5512-2 (Martín-Moreno et al., 2011). The initial 6-fold increase of IL-6 from the Aβ was decreased by both cannabinoid agonists, and WIN5512-2 partially reduced TNF-alpha gene expression (Martín-Moreno et al., 2011). In a similar experiment, Aβ injected mice subject to subchronic administration of WIN5512-2 or CBD showed better performance in the Morris water maze task, an experiment in which a mouse is placed within a circular pool of water and must escape from the water onto a hidden platform whose location is discerned through the use of spatial memory (Martín-Moreno et al., 2011). Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 12 CBD is a CB2 receptor agonist that also prevents Aβ neurodegeneration by reducing microglial activation responsible for the release of toxic molecules like nitric oxide (NO) and proin�ammatory cytokines (Martín-Moreno et al., 2011). By inhibiting calcium responses in glial cells, cannabinoid agonists are similarly able to prevent microglial activation. Fig. 6: Illustration of inhibitory activity by receptor agonists. Additionally, CB1 receptor activation causes migration of the N13 (nitrogen-13) microglial cells and primary microglial cells (Martín-Morenoetal., 2011). Migration is a cellular mechanism that ultimately allows for the removal of deposit Aβ protein. In a study conducted in Aβ injected mice, those that did not receive the CBD treatment of WIN5512-2 showed signi�cant reduction in their ability to reach a hidden platform (Martín-Moreno et al., 2011). Another strength Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 13 pertaining to the inhibitory activity of receptor agonists is the suppression of Aβ plaque buildup. Aspreviously mentioned, AD has been largely characterized by its substantial aggregation of beta amyloid peptide clusters; thus, focusing further investigation towards the wingless-related integration site (Wnt) pathway as it becomes largely impacted due to aforementioned clusters (Esposito, 2006). Normally, Wnt activation triggers the “...inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta (GSK-3β), a multifunctional phosphorylating serine/threonine kinase and relative accumulation of [unphosphorylated] β-catenin in the cytoplasm” (Esposito, 2006). This Aggregation allows for the expression of genes that code for homeostasis and neuronal survival (Esposito, 2006). Within neurons exposed to Aβ peptides, however, GSK-3ß is activated through phosphorylation; therefore, Wnt signaling experienced signi�cant reduction (Esposito, 2006). Furthermore, these phosphorylated GSK-3ß lead to the neuro�brillary tangles and signi�cant tau protein hyperphosphorylation witnessed in the brains of patients with AD (Esposito, 2006). CBD serves as a rescue of the Wnt signaling pathway as it promptly reduces the accumulation of phosphorylated GSK-3ß, consequently inhibiting the rise of neuro�brillary tangles and tau protein hyperphosphorylation (Esposito, 2006). Furthermore, CBD indirectly inhibits neural apoptosis due to its rescue of the Wnt signaling pathway (Esposito, 2006). ∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is another viable receptor agonist in combating the advancement of Alzheimer’s disease via competitive inhibition. THC, the active component of marijuana, competitively inhibits acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in addition to preventing acetylcholinesterase-induced Aβ plaque buildup (Eubanks, 2006). One study, conducted by Eubanks et al., demonstrated through computational modeling of THC-AChE interaction that THC binds to AChE in a critical region involved in amyloid synthesis, ultimately serving an inhibitory function (Eubanks, 2006). THC and analogous compounds were found to augment acetylcholine levels by inhibiting Aβ aggregation and reducing neurotransmitter degradation(Eubanks, 2006).This study proposes a possible mechanism by which THC molecules directly impact the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (Eubanks, 2006). Through focusing on the cholinergic system, THC was found to be a promising receptor agonist as its potential AChE inhibition might be implicated in AD treatment (Campbell et al., 2007). Multiple drugs — donepezil, edrophonium, galantamine, etc. — inhibit AChE for the purpose of increasing acetylcholine (ACh) levels in the synapse and increasing cholinergic Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 14 transmission. In an investigation of cannabinoids as potential inhibitors of AChE, Δ-9-THC was found to be a competitive inhibitor for AChE, which has the added e�ect of inhibiting Aβaggregation (AChE has been found to accelerate the aggregation of Aβpeptides into complexes, increasing their neurotoxicity) (Campbell et al., 2007). Nonetheless, more research is needed in order to understand the e�cacies of CBD and THC in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. As therapeutic treatments for Alzheimer’s disease continue to be explored, CBD is a promising candidate. A handful of studies show that THC is a more e�ective inhibitor than CBD in regards to amyloid plaque buildup. While the general consensus of the present community is built upon the e�ects of cannabidiol, the e�cacy of ∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol should also be considered as a viable method of treatment for Alzheimer’s. It is nearly impossible to ignore the therapeutic potential of receptor agonists within the endocannabinoid system against the advancement of Alzheimer's Disease. B. Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists target the degenerative e�ects of Alzheimer’s through the CB1 and CB2 receptors of the ECS. These receptor agonists can reduce the density of neuritic plaques by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase activity, or increasing expression of neprilysin, an enzyme in the Aβ degradation cascade (Fernández-Ruiz et al., 2015). The syntheticcannabinoids also function as a treatment that blocks the activation of the microglial clustercaused by the deposition of Aβ at the senile plaque. This deposition is typically responsible for the prolonged damaging e�ects of the disease, and the presence of cannabinoids alleviates neurodegeneration (Ramírez et al., 2005). Since these potential neuroprotective e�ects have been discovered, extensive research is being dedicated towards studying the endocannabinoid system. Researchers have already found That dysfunction of CB1 and CB2 receptors and in endocannabinoid signaling plays a speci�c role in the pathophysiology of AD (Liu et al., 2015). One study investigated the speci�c bene�ts that synthetic cannabinoids could have on neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) associated with AD. The researchers studied two synthetic analogs of Δ-9-THC, Dronabinol and Nabilone, and their interactions with receptors in the ECS. Nabilone and Dronabinol were Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 15 found to be more potent analogs to THC that act on both CB1 and CB2 receptors and reduced overall agitation in AD patients (Liu et al., 2015). Participants receiving Nabilone experienced no adverse side e�ects. In the Dronabinol study, the researchers measured disturbed behavior in study participants using the Cohen-Mans�eld Agitation Inventory (CMAI), a scale which systematically assesses patient agitation. They found that with administration of the synthetic cannabinoid, disturbed behavior dropped among the participants over the course of the 6-week test period (Liu et al., 2015). Stimulation of the CB2 receptor by these synthetic cannabinoids increases the removal of Aβ deposits by enhancing macrophage activity, thus explaining the improvements in NPS seen in study participants. Another studyinvestigating the e�cacy of Nabilone as a potential treatment for the NPS of AD similarly found an overall decrease in agitation, and sometimes aggression as well (Ruthirakuhan et al., 2019). The synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists WIN55,212-2 and arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide were also found to decrease aggressive behavior associated with AD and reduce tau hyperphosphorylation and the neuro�brillary tangles (Liu et al., 2015). WIN55,212-2 along with JWH-133 were also found to assist in the removal of Aβ deposits, one of the most common pathophysiology associated with Alzheimer’s. WIN55,212-2’s ability to stimulate neurogenesis makes it a great contender as a therapeutic agent. Although there are positive outcomes of such drugs on reversing AD-related amnesia, they must be used with caution as there is a risk of exacerbating the neurodegeneration associated with AD (Liu et al., 2015). Agonists that speci�cally target CB2 activate responses that reduce both in�ammatory and Aβ plaque buildup. The CB2 agonist JWH-015 was used to further investigate the function of CB2 with tests done on AD human tissue. These tests demonstrated that JWH-015 was able to reduce plaque buildup dramatically in THP-1 macrophage cells (Tolón et al., 2009). However, the U373 astrocytoma cells, which are from the astrocytoma cancer cell line in the human brain, were immune to the e�ects (Tolónet al., 2009). Thus, the CB2 agonist induced plaque removal was only e�ective in certain cells (the human macrophages). This �nding shows some limits of CB2 agonist use in alleviating symptoms, while narrowing down a line of cells to focus on. CB2 receptors' primary role in plaque removal, with in vitro injection of the antagonist SR144528, showed partial reversal of the JWH-015 Aβ removal (Tolón et al., 2009), which highlights other factors at play in plaque reduction. These results indicate that JWH-015 can be used Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 16 as a speci�c target treatment for AD, however it is not the only option. CB2 receptor agonists have a preventative function in suppressing neuroin�ammation (Ehrhart et al., 2005). Irregularly stimulated CD40 receptor expression by the signaling pathway IFN-γ is prominent in patients with AD and is known to increase in�ammation (Ehrhart et al., 2005). CD40 induction produces in�ammatory cytokines and is correlated with the in�ammation and Aβ peptide increase in AD. Using the JWH-015 agonists, stimulation of CB2 diminishes IFN-γ-induced CD40 expression in microglial cells (Ehrhart et al., 2005). This occurs by the intervention of the JAK/STAT1pathway (Ehrhart et al., 2005), which is a pathway that is involved with immune system response and ultimately decreases IFN-γ-induced CD40 expression. There is further evidence to show thatCB2 agonists have the potential to inhibit in�ammation. JWH-133, a CB2 agonist, was found to rescue spatial memory de�cits in rats injected with Okadaic acid (OKA), which induces spatial memory impairment and neurodegeneration (Çakır et al., 2019). Rats injected with OKA were found to have higher numbers of degenerative neurons in the cortex and hippocampus, but the addition of JWH-133 ameliorated this damage (Çakır et al., 2019). JWH-133 application was found to reduce the level of immunoreactivity caused by OKA. Caspase-3, Aβ, and IL-1β immunoreactivity were reduced in both the hippocampus and the cortex, while TNF-αimmunoreactivity was reduced in only the hippocampus (Çakır et al., 2019). 1-((3-benzyl-3-methyl-2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran-6-yl) carbonyl) piperidine (MDA7), a highly-selective CB2 agonist, was found to have a neuroprotective e�ect in in vivo and in vitro models (Wu et al., 2012). MDA7 administration in Aβ1–4-induced mice was found to lower immunoreactivity in the hippocampus (Wu et al., 2012). The Morris water maze test (Wu et al., 2012) showed MDA7 rescued amyloid �bril-impaired performance. While progress has been made in the development of drugs targeting these receptors, the ones currently available to patients come with many unwanted side e�ects such as nausea, vomiting, and weight loss (Wattet al., 2017). While there are bound to be side e�ects to most drugs, synthetic cannabinoids o�er the added bene�t of producing e�ects similar to that which natural Cannabis derivatives cause but without the psychoactive side e�ects (Campbell et al., 2007). Due to the complexity of AD and the pathology of many di�erent pathways involved, it is unlikely that just one drug will su�ce to treat the progression of the disease. Rather, Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 17 it is more likely that multiple drugs will be needed to treat the multifaceted symptoms of Alzheimer’s. IV. Potential and E�ective Therapies A. Natural Therapies Cannabinoids possess great potential as e�ective natural therapies for AD. Previous studies indicate that Cannabis use diminishes symptoms associated with AD (Suryadevara et al., 2017). When administered in patients with similar neurodegenerative conditions, Cannabis use is shown to decrease pain and spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis, decrease tremor, rigidity, and pain in people with Parkinson’s disease, and improve the quality of life of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients by improving appetite and decreasing pain and spasticity (Suryadevara et al., 2017). Interestingly, a large portion of the negative side e�ects from Cannabis administration in these diseases is absent in Alzheimer’s patients (Suryadevara et al., 2017). Cannabis has been used to alleviate pain and muscular contractions to target the in�amed pathways of the brain in Alzheimer’s patients. The perception of pain is atypical in that Alzheimer’s patients are more prone to oxidative stress, which is an imbalance between free radicals and the body’s ability to detoxify them. However, studies demonstrate a positive relationship between stress reduction in dementia and medical Cannabisuse (Aso et al., 2014). The anti-in�ammatory and anti-neurotoxicity properties of cannabinoids help mediate the neuroin�ammation caused by microglia activation, which is characteristic of chronic pain in Alzheimer's patients. In addition, further studies have shown that with the use of cannabinoids, Alzheimer’s patients have experienced a decrease in altered cognitive ability (Aso et al., 2014). Research indicates that a "coadministration of CBD and Δ9-THC” is necessary in order to deliver the bene�cial elements of Cannabiswhile attempting to reduce certain side e�ects of Δ9-THC in Alzheimer’spatients (Giacoppo et al., 2014). CBD and THC, natural components in cannabinoids, provide encouraging results for possible use in Alzheimer’s patients. The phytocannabinoid component of Cannabis, a naturally occurring component found in the trichomes of this plant, is seen to be particularly bene�cial in the treatment of Alzheimer's Disease as it lacks psychoactive properties and does not risk further cognitive impairment damage in Alzheimer’s patients (Karlet al., 2017). In fact, Cannabis can can actually help restore cognitive dysfunctions characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease (Uddin et al., 2020). Cannabis is a promising agent with numerous Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 18 therapeutic properties that hinder the progression of AD, leading to the investigation of cannabidiol (CBD) therapies. Current CBD therapies are seen to bring “very modest symptomatic relief” (Karl et al., 2017). CBD treatment is described as being a preventative, multimodal drug strategy targeting the wide variety of symptoms, making it a viable candidate for AD therapy (Karl et al., 2017). V. Conclusion The features of AD, which consist of in�ammation (Atakan, 2012), amyloid-beta plaque buildup (Farkhondehet al., 2020), and neuro�brillary tangles (Hall et al., 2001; Nelson et al.,2012), lead to life-altering cognitive de�cits and other extensive e�ects that impact a signi�cant population of individuals. It is one of the most heavily researched diseases, yet there is still no method to stop its progression. Therefore, the injection of cannabinoids provides one promising revenue for scientists to counter the damage. The connection between AD and cannabinoids has been made apparent through many recent studies. Investigations into the e�cacy of the ECS as well as natural and synthetic cannabinoids have developed in regards to the treatment and management of AD and its varying pathologies. Cannabinoid agonists have presented researchers with neuroprotective qualities as well as the ability to manage the chronic psychiatric pathology associated with AD. This is due to the inherent physiology of the endocannabinoid system. ECS receptors exist both in the brain and parts of the immune system pathways, as a result, controlling its function through cannabinoid agonists and ECS ligands can serve both as a neuromodulator and an immunomodulator. Therapeutic use of the ECS and cannabinoids in relation to AD include elevated activation of endocannabinoid receptors to bolster neurogenesis and thus reduce the neurodegenerative e�ects of AD (Fagan & Campbell, 2014). This process occurs through the stimulation of CB1 receptors by the endocannabinoid signaling molecules and external agonists. CB2 receptors are mainly targeted for their anti-in�ammation properties (Tolón et al., 2009); their modulation using receptor agonists — such as JWH-015 (Tolón et al., 2009) and JWH-133 (Çakır et al., 2019) — indicates a reduction of proin�ammatory molecules,which block proper neurofunction, that are normally present in AD. Endocannabinoid-speci�c agonists also inhibit the e�ects of AD by blocking harmful processes in the brain; these processes are microglia activation (Martín-Moreno et al., 2011), neuro�brillary tangles, and tau protein phosphorylation (Esposito, 2006). Experimentation with the Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 19 synthetic agonist has been seen to further suppress symptoms due to their structural similarity to the natural cannabinoids and have even stronger receptor activation. Mice study results identify the synthetic agonists according to what they prevent in the AD injured brain: WIN55,212-2 is correlated to nerve development (Liu et al., 2015), JWH-133 binds to CB2 to reduce rapid in�ammation (Çakır et al., 2019), and Dronabinol and Nabilone treat mostly neuropsychiatric symptoms (Liu et al.,2015). In dealing with the synapse, long term potentiation was regained in tests with mice who had amyloid-beta plaque buildup in combination with CBD dosages (Hughes et al., 2019). As The major �nding is the revival of neuron activity, restoration of the cholinergic signaling system alleviates AND e�ects (Thompson et al., 2020). While commonly used as a relief drug, natural cannabinoids THC and CBD derived from the Cannabis Plant are used in tandem to manage cognitive de�cits (Giacoppo et al., 2014). CBD acts as a modulator to THC intoxication and together e�ectively reduces oxidative stress and in�ammation associated with AD (Giacoppo etal., 2014). While more studies and clinical trials are required before making any de�nitive statements,the associations discovered thus far indicate necessary future research and possible implementations of this form of therapy. Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 20 References 1. Aguirre-Rueda, D., Guerra-Ojeda, S., Aldasoro, M., Iradi, A., Obrador, E., Mauricio, M.D., Vila, J. M., Marchio, P., & Valles, S. L. (2015). WIN 55,212-2, agonist of cannabinoid receptors, prevents amyloid β1-42 e�ects on astrocytes in primary culture. PloS one, 10(4), e0122843. 2. Ahmad, R., Go�n, K., Van den Stock, J., De Winter, F. L., Cleeren, E., Bormans, G., Tournoy, J., Persoons, P., Van Laere, K., & Vandenbulcke, M. (2014). In vivo type 1 cannabinoid receptor availability in Alzheimer's disease. European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 24(2), 242–250.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro. 2013.10.002 3. Ahmad, R., Postnov, A., Bormans, G., Versijpt, J., Vandenbulcke, M., & Van Laere, K. (2016).Decreased in vivo availability of the cannabinoid type 2 receptor in Alzheimer's disease. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 43(12), 2219–2227.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016 -3457-7 4. Aso, E., & Ferrer, I. (2016). CB2 cannabinoid receptor as potential target against Alzheimer's Disease. Frontiers in neuroscience, 10, 243. 5. Atakan Z. (2012). Cannabis, a complex plant: di�erent compounds and di�erent e�ects on individuals. Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2(6), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/2045125312457586 6. Bonnet, A. E., & Marchalant, Y. (2015). Potential Therapeutical Contributions of the Endocannabinoid System towards Aging and Alzheimer's Disease. Aging and disease, 6(5), 400–405. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2015.0617 7. Basavarajappa, B. S., Nagre, N. N., Xie, S., & Subbanna, S. (2014). Elevation of endogenous anandamide impairs LTP, learning, and memory through CB1 receptor signaling in mice. Hippocampus, 24(7), 808–818. 8. Bonini, S. A., Premoli, M., Tambaro, S., Kumar, A., Maccarinelli, G., Memo, M., & Mastinu, A. (2018). Cannabis sativa: A comprehensive ethnopharmacological review of a medicinal plant with a long history. Journal of ethnopharmacology, 227, 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2018.09.004 9. Çakır, M., Tekin, S., Doğanyiğit, Z., Erden, Y., Soytürk, M., Çiğremiş, Y., & Sandal, S. (2019). Cannabinoid type 2 receptor agonist JWH-133, attenuates Okadaic acid induced spatial memory impairment and neurodegeneration in rats. Life sciences, 217, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.11.058 10. Campbell, V. A., & Gowran, A. (2007). Alzheimer’s disease; taking the edge o� with cannabinoids? British Journal of Pharmacology, 152(5), 655–662. 11. Cubinkova, V., Valachova, B., Uhrinova, I., Brezovakova, V., Smolek, T., Jadhav, S., & Zilka,N. (2018). Alternative hypotheses related to Alzheimer's disease. Bratislavske lekarske listy, 119(4), 210–216. 12. Defrancesco, M., & Hofer, A. (2020). Cannabinoid as Bene�cial Replacement Therapy for Psychotropics to Treat Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 21 Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Severe Alzheimer's Dementia: A Clinical Case Report. Frontiers in psychiatry, 11, 413. 13. Di Marzo, V., Stella, N., & Zimmer, A. (2015). Endocannabinoid signalling and the deteriorating brain. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 16(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3876 14. Ehrhart, J., Obregon, D., Mori, T. et al. Stimulation of cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) suppresses microglial activation. J Neuroinflammation 2,29 (2005). 15. Esposito, G., De Filippis, D., Carnuccio, R., Izzo, A. A., & Iuvone, T. (2006). The marijuana component cannabidiol inhibits beta-amyloid-induced tau protein hyperphosphorylation through Wnt/beta-catenin pathway rescue in PC12 cells. Journal of Molecular Medicine (Berlin, Germany), 84(3), 253–258. 16. Aso, E., & Ferrer, I. (2014). Cannabinoids for treatment of Alzheimer's disease: moving toward the clinic. Frontiers in pharmacology, 5, 37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2014.00037 17. Eubanks, L. M., Rogers, C. J., Beuscher, Koob, G. F., Olson, A. J., Dickerson, T. J., & Janda, K.D. (2006). A Molecular Link between the Active Component of Marijuana and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology. Molecular Pharmaceutics, 3(6), 773–777. 18. Fagan, S. G., & Campbell, V. A. (2014). The in�uence of cannabinoids on generic traits of neurodegeneration. British Journal of Pharmacology, 171(6), 1347–1360. 19. Farkhondeh, T., Khan, H., Aschner, M., Samini, F., Pourbagher-Shahri, A. M., Aramjoo, H., Roshanravan, B., Hoyte, C., Mehrpour, O., & Samarghandian, S. (2020). Impact of Cannabis-Based Medicine on Alzheimer's Disease by Focusing on the Amyloid β-Modi�cations: A Systematic Study. CNS & neurological disorders drug targets, 19(5), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.2174/18715273196662007081 30745 20. Fernández-Ruiz, J., Moro, M. A., & Martínez-Orgado, J. (2015). Cannabinoids in Neurodegenerative Disorders and Stroke/Brain Trauma: From Preclinical Models to Clinical Applications. Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 12(4), 793–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-015-0381-7 21. Giacoppo, S., Mandolino, G., Galuppo, M., Bramanti, P., & Mazzon, E. (2014). Cannabinoids:new promising agents in the treatment of neurological diseases. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 19(11), 18781–18816. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules191118781. 22. Hall, G. F., Lee, V. M., Lee, G., & Yao, J. (2001). Staging of neuro�brillary degeneration caused by human tau overexpression in a unique cellular model of human tauopathy. The Americanjournal of pathology, 158(1), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63962-4 23. Hughes, B., & Herron, C. E. (2019). Cannabidiol Reverses De�cits in Hippocampal LTP in aModel of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurochemical Research, 44(3), 703–713. 24. Karl, T., Garner, B., & Cheng, D. (2017). The therapeutic potential of the phytocannabinoid cannabidiol for Alzheimer’s disease. Behavioural Pharmacology, 28, Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 22 142–160.https://doi.org/10.1097/fbp.0000000 000000247 25. Li, H., Liu, Y., Tian, D., Tian, L., Ju, X., Qi, L., Wang, Y., & Liang, C. (2020). Overview of cannabidiol (CBD) and its analogues: Structures, biological activities, and neuroprotective mechanisms in epilepsy and Alzheimer's disease. European journal of medicinal chemistry, 192, 112163. 26. Libro, R., Diomede, F., Scionti, D., Piattelli, A., Grassi, G., Pollastro, F., Bramanti, P., Mazzon, E., & Trubiani, O. (2016). Cannabidiol Modulates the Expression of Alzheimer's Disease-Related Genes in Mesenchymal Stem Cells. International journal of molecular sciences, 18(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18010026 27. Eubanks, L. M., Rogers, C. J., Beuscher, A. E., 4th, Koob, G. F., Olson, A. J., Dickerson, T. J., & Janda, K. D. (2006). A molecular link between the active component of marijuana and Alzheimer's disease pathology. Molecular pharmaceutics, 3(6), 773–777. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp060066m 28. Liu, C. S., Chau, S. A., Ruthirakuhan, M., Lanctôt, K. L., & Herrmann, N. (2015). Cannabinoids for the Treatment of Agitation and Aggression in Alzheimer’s Disease. CNS Drugs, 29(8), 615–623. 29. Martín-Moreno, A. M., Reigada, D., Ramírez, B. G., Mechoulam, R., Innamorato, N., Cuadrado,A., & de Ceballos, M. L. (2011). Cannabidiol and other cannabinoids reduce microglial activation in vitro and in vivo: relevance to Alzheimer's disease. Molecular pharmacology, 79(6), 964–973. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.111.071290 30. McPartland, J. M., Glass, M., & Pertwee, R. G. (2007). Meta-analysis of cannabinoid ligand binding a�nity and receptor distribution: interspecies di�erences. British journal of pharmacology, 152(5), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0707399 31. Nelson, P. T., Alafuzo�, I., Bigio, E. H., Bouras, C., Braak, H., Cairns, N. J., Castellani, R. J.,Crain, B. J., Davies, P., Del Tredici, K., Duyckaerts, C., Frosch, M. P., Haroutunian, V., Hof, P.R., Hulette, C. M., Hyman, B. T., Iwatsubo, T., Jellinger, K. A., Jicha, G. A., Kövari, E., ...Beach, T. G. (2012). Correlation of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive status: a review of the literature. Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 71(5), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e318250 18f7. 32. Nuñez-Borque, E., González-Naranjo, P., Bartolomé, F., Alquézar, C., Reinares-Sebastián, A.,Pérez, C., Ceballos, M. L., Páez, J. A., Campillo, N. E., & Martín-Requero, Á. (2020). Targeting Cannabinoid Receptor Activation and BACE-1 Activity Counteracts TgAPP Mice Memory Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease Lymphoblast Alterations. Molecular neurobiology, 57(4), 1938–1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-018-2513-z 33. Paloczi, J., Varga, Z. V., Hasko, G., & Pacher, P. (2018). Neuroprotection in Oxidative Stress-Related Neurodegenerative Diseases: Role of Endocannabinoid System Modulation. Antioxidants & redox signaling, 29(1), 75–108. 34. Plotnikov, A., Zehorai, E., Procaccia, S., & Seger, R. (2011). The MAPK cascades: signaling components, nuclear roles and mechanisms of nuclear translocation. Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 23 Biochimica et biophysica acta, 1813(9), 1619–1633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.12.012 35. Ramírez, B. G., Blázquez, C., Pulgar, T. G. del, Guzmán, M., & Ceballos, M. L. de. (2005).Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology by Cannabinoids: Neuroprotection Mediated byBlockade of Microglial Activation. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(8), 1904–1913. 36. Rodrigues, R. S., Lourenço, D. M., Paulo, S. L., Mateus, J. M., Ferreira, M. F., Mouro, F. M.,Moreira, J. B., Ribeiro, F. F., Sebastião, A. M., & Xapelli, S. (2019). Cannabinoid Actions onNeural Stem Cells: Implications for Pathophysiology. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 24(7),1350. 37. Ruthirakuhan, M., Lanctôt, K. L., Vieira, D., & Herrmann, N. (2019). Natural and Synthetic Cannabinoids for Agitation and Aggression in Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 80(2), 18r12617. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.18r12617 38. Schubert, D., Kepchia, D., Liang, Z., Dargusch, R., Goldberg, J., & Maher, P. (2019). E�cacyof Cannabinoids in a Pre-Clinical Drug-Screening Platform for Alzheimer’s Disease. Molecular Neurobiology, 56(11), 7719–7730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-019-1637-8. 39. Scuderi, C., Steardo, L., & Esposito, G. (2014). Cannabidiol promotes amyloid precursor protein ubiquitination and reduction of beta amyloid expression in SHSY5YAPP+ cells through PPARγ involvement. Phytotherapy research : PTR, 28(7), 1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5095. 40. Shankar, G. M., Li, S., Mehta, T. H., Garcia-Munoz, A., Shepardson, N. E., Smith, I., Brett, F. M., Farrell, M. A., Rowan, M. J., Lemere, C. A., Regan, C. M., Walsh, D. M., Sabatini, B. L., & Selkoe, D. J. (2008). Amyloid-beta protein dimers isolated directly from Alzheimer's brains impair synaptic plasticity and memory. Nature medicine, 14(8), 837–842. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1782 41. Sofroniew, M. V., & Vinters, H. V. (2010). Astrocytes: Biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathologica, 119(1), 7–35.Suryadevara, U., Bruijnzeel, D. M., Nuthi, M., Jagnarine, D. A., Tandon, R., & Bruijnzeel, A.W. (2017). Pros and Cons of Medical Cannabis use by People with Chronic Brain Disorders. Current Neuropharmacology, 15(6), 800–814.https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X1 4666161101095325. 42. Suryadevara, U., Bruijnzeel, D. M., Nuthi, M., Jagnarine, D. A., Tandon, R., & Bruijnzeel, A.W. (2017). Pros and Cons of Medical Cannabis use by People with Chronic Brain Disorders. Current neuropharmacology, 15(6), 800–814.https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X1 4666161101095325. 43. Talarico, G., Trebbastoni, A., Bruno, G., & de Lena, C. (2019). Modulation of the CannabinoidSystem: A New Perspective for the Treatment of the Alzheimer’s Disease. Current Neuropharmacology, 17(2), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159x166661807021 44644. 44. Karl, T., Cheng, D., Garner, B., & Arnold, J. C. (2012). The therapeutic potential of the endocannabinoid system for Alzheimer's disease. Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 24 Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 16(4), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1517/14728222.2012.671812 45. Thomas, A., Baillie, G. L., Phillips, A. M., Razdan, R. K., Ross, R. A., & Pertwee, R. G. (2007). Cannabidiol displays unexpectedly high potency as an antagonist of CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists in vitro. British journal of pharmacology, 150(5), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0707133 46. Thompson, K. J., & Tobin, A. B. (2020). Crosstalk between the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor and the endocannabinoid system: A relevance for Alzheimer’s disease? Cellular Signalling, 70, 109545. 47. Tolón, R. M., Núñez, E., Pazos, M. R., Benito, C., Castillo, A. I., Martínez-Orgado, J. A., & Romero, J. (2009). The activation of cannabinoid CB2 receptors stimulates in situ and in vitrobeta-amyloid removal by human macrophages. Brain research, 1283, 148–154. 48. Uddin, M. S., Mamun, A. A., Sumsuzzman, D. M., Ashraf, G. M., Perveen, A., Bungau, S. G.,Mousa, S. A., El-Seedi, H. R., Bin-Jumah, M. N., & Abdel-Daim, M. M. (2020). EmergingPromise of Cannabinoids for the Management of Pain and Associated NeuropathologicalAlterations in Alzheimer's Disease. Frontiers in pharmacology, 11, 1097.https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01097 49. Vallée, A., Lecarpentier, Y., Guillevin, R., & Vallée, J. N. (2017). E�ects of cannabidiol interactions with Wnt/β-catenin pathway and PPARγ on oxidative stress and neuroin�ammation in Alzheimer's disease. Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica, 49(10), 853–866. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmx073 50. Velikova, M., Doncheva, D., & Tashev, R. (2020). Subchronic e�ects of ligands of cannabinoid receptors on learning and memory processes of olfactory bulbectomized rats. Acta Neurobiologiae experimentalis, 80(3), 286–296. 51. Watt, G., & Karl, T. (2017). In vivo Evidence for Therapeutic Properties of Cannabidiol (CBD)for Alzheimer’s Disease. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 8. 52. Wu, J., Bie, B., Yang, H., Xu, J. J., Brown, D. L., & Naguib, M. (2013). Suppression of central chemokine fractalkine receptor signaling alleviates amyloid-induced memory de�ciency. Neurobiology of aging, 34(12), 2843–2852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.0 6.003 Berkeley Pharma Tech Journal of Medicine | 25 Article 1_The Therapeutic Potential of Synthetic and Natural Cannabinoids in Treating Alzheimer’s Disease_Publish.pdf 2. FRONT PAGE - The Therapeutic Potential of Synthetic and Natural Cannabinoids in Treating Alzheimer’s Disease (1).pdf 3. BODY DOCUMENT - The Therapeutic Potential of Synthetic and Natural - Cannabinoids in Treating Alzheimer’s Disease.pdf Cannabinoids Paper Reference Page (3).pdf