BECE. Newsletter Vol.20, No.1, 2025, BECE 1977 Teacher Criticism and Behavioral Improvement In- tention of Secondary School Students: The Effect of the Closeness of Teacher-Student Relationships By Cheng, Y., Yan, L., & Zhang, F. Correspondence to: Feng Zhang, Ningbo University, China. E-mail: zhangfeng@nbu.edu.cn HIS article examines the effects of the type of teacher criticism on be- havioral improvement intention in junior and senior secondary students and the teacher-student relationship, as well as the effect of teacher-student closeness on the relationship between teacher criticism and student behavior- al improvement intention.. Research Findings:  Person criticism from the teacher has a negative effect on student perception of the closeness of teacher-student rela- tionships in both junior and senior secondary school stu- dents and weakens their intention to improve their behavior. The closeness of the teacher-student relationship fully me- diates the relation between person criticism and student be- havioral improvement intention. This type of teacher criti- cism represents a negation of the student’s overall worth, conveying the feeling of aversion, which can easily trigger senses of unfairness and often culminates in emotional reac- tion and behavioral resistance from the student. Furthermore, person criticism can lead to the formation of negative self- concept in students. When receiving person criticism, the student tends to attribute their error to their deficits in com- petence, feeling helplessness. Long-term exposure to person criticism reinforces the student’s self-negation, prompting their deliberate avoidance of growth opportunities. This finding suggests that person criticism is an inappropriate approach to correcting student behavior.  Process criticism from the teacher can heighten the percep- tion of teacher-student closeness in senior secondary stu- dents but weaken that in junior secondary students. The closeness of the teacher-student relationship also fully me- diates the relationship between process criticism and student behavioral improvement intention. However, process criti- T mailto:zhangfeng@nbu.edu.cn Vol.20, No.1, 2025, BECE 1978 cism can strengthen senior secondary students’ behavioral improvement intention by increasing their perception of teacher-student closeness, whereas it can undermine junior secondary students’ behavioral improvement intention by diminishing their perception of teacher-student closeness. This may be because senior secondary students, who are in late adolescence, can distinguish between process and per- son criticism and comprehend goodwill behind the teacher’s criticism, thus able to transform criticism into motivation for improvement. Contrarily, junior secondary students, due to their less mature mental development, tend to interpret every type of criticism as absolute negation, and thus devel- op resistance to the teacher’s instruction and alienation from the teacher. This finding implies that junior secondary teachers may face more challenges in correcting student be- havior than their senior secondary counterparts. Source: Psychological Development and Education, 2025; 41(01), 42-51.