BECE. Newsletter Vol.6, No.1, 2020 801 The Effect of Teachers’ Support on School Adaptation of Chinese Migrant Children By Yang, K.C., Jia, A.B., Guo, X. Correspondence to: Yang, K.C. Email: yangkuichen2007@163.com SING data from China Education Panel Survey (2014-2015), the cur- rent study focused on the role and the internal mechanisms of teachers’ support on school adaptation of Chinese migrant children. The research car- ried out data analysis by building relationship models among three dimen- sions of teacher support (academic support, emotional support, and relation- ship support), self-education expectations of migrant children, mental health status, and school adaptation. The research findings are as follows:  The school adaptation level of migrant children was significantly lower than that of the urban local children.  Teachers’ support and its three sub-dimensions had positive effects on self-educational expectations, mental health and school adapta- tion.  Self-educational expectations and mental health played an interme- diate role between teachers’ support and school adaptation of mi- grant children.  The three dimensions of teachers’ support had different influence mechanisms on school adaptation of migrant children; teachers’ ac- ademic support influenced school adaptation through self-edu- cational expectations, teachers’ emotional support influenced school adaptation through mental health, and teachers’ relationship support influenced school adaptation through self-educational expectations and mental health. Therefore, in the design of the migrant children’s social integration poli- cies, we should pay more attention to the problem occurs when facing school adaptation, fully play the protective role of teachers’ support for children’s school adaptation, establish and improve the mental health service system for the mobile children, and as a result, improve the external social and ecologi- cal environment for the living and learning of the migrant children with the intervention of comprehensive social integration policies. Source: Education & Economy, 2020; 36(1):77-86. U