PEER-REVIEW ARTICLE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6411 Reuse of Cornus officinalis Nutlet for Bioenergy Xiaochen Yue,a,# Zhaolin Li,a,# Su Shiung Lam,b Wan-Xi Peng,a,* and Yifeng He a,* As a traditional nourishing Chinese herbal medicine, Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc. has a long history of application. At present, only the flesh of the fruit of Cornus officinalis is used as a medicine, which wastes a large quantity of ingredients in the nutlet. To improve the comprehensive utilization efficiency of the fruit’s nutlet, which could be used when there is a shortage of the plant’s fruit in the market, this study used Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (PY-GC-MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques to analyze the Cornus officinalis nutlet. The results showed that the active ingredients of Cornus officinalis nutlet have great medicinal value and could become a substitute for the fruit. After extracting the active ingredients, the residue can be used as a good biomass liquid fuel, providing reference for the future to replace fossil fuels. This study provides the scientific basis for the comprehensive utilization of high-quality resources for Cornus officinalis. DOI: 10.15376/biores.17.4.6411-6444 Keywords: Cornus officinalis nutlet; NMR analysis; Py-GC-MS; TGA-DTG; Biofuel Contact information: a: School of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China; b: Pyrolysis Technology Research Group, Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries (AKUATROP), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia;*Corresponding authors: heyifeng310@163.com; pengwanxi@163.com; #These authors equally contributed to this work as co-first authors. INTRODUCTION Wood is an organic substance formed by natural growth. In addition to cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, it contains other minor components. Wood extract can be obtained with the use of ethanol, benzene, ethyl ether, acetone, dichloromethane, and other organic solvents. Wood extract contains more than 700 types of compounds, some of which can be used directly in dyes, preservatives, spices, activators, pesticides, and pharmaceuticals. However, few studies have researched the composition, content, and nature of wood extracts as biomass, which has not been given sufficient attention in the wood processing industry. As a clean energy in the 21st century, there has been great interest in biomass energy because fossil resources are being depleted. Analyzing the composition of wood extracts increases the comprehensive understanding of the role and benefits that bioenergy can play. Tannins from bark can strengthen phenolic resin or urea-formaldehyde resin (Zhang et al. 2015). Wani et al. (1963) found that paclitaxel from mushroom extracts has an anti-cancer effect on leukemia, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and colon cancer (Peng et al. 2017a; Ge et al. 2018). However, few studies have been conducted on the composition of the nutlet of Cornus officinalis using a variety of extraction methods. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6412 Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc. is a deciduous shrub or small tree of Cornaceae that produces clusters of fruits known as Asiatic cornelian cherries (Corni Fructus or Shu Zhu Yu). It is used as a food plant, and its mature fruit is also used in traditional Chinese medicine. The fruit is sour, astringent, tepid, and is used as a liver and kidney tonic. The active ingredient has antibacterial and diuretic properties, lowers blood pressure, decreases postprandial hyperglycemia, and stimulates the immune system and other physiological activity resin (Zhang et al. 2013; He et al. 2019). Immuno-pharmacological activity analysis of the various components isolated from the seed or nutlet of Cornus officinalis revealed some differences in their immunocompetence. Among them, both polysaccharides and glycosides have immunosuppressive effects. The effect of the monoterpenoid iridoid on the content of sICAM-1 and TNF-α in the model of vascular complications in diabetic rats may be related to its inhibitory effect on non-enzymatic glycation reaction (Gang et al. 2013). The nutlet extract of Cornus officinalis increases superoxide dismutase (SOD) blood activity in rats, inhibits free radical generation, and reduces malondialdehyde (MDA) levels (Tan et al. 2006). The annual output of Cornus officinalis fruit (COF) in China is more than 6000 tons every year, and in recent years, the inventory of COF is 3000 tons every year (Chen et al. 2012). The situation that the output of COF exceeds the sales is becoming increasingly obvious. In addition, the increase of manual picking costs has led to no one willing to manage the COF after it has become mature and abandoned, resulting in waste of C. officinalis resources. However, in view of the solution to this situation, the current research focuses on the use of Cornus officinalis nutlet as medicine instead of flesh to increase the application of COF. Little research on the application of Cornus officinalis nutlet as biofuel has been conducted. Therefore, it is more urgent to find ways to expand the application of C. officinalis and realize the maximum resource utilization of C. officinalis. In this study, the components of C. officinalis nutlet (CON) from COF and its extracts were analyzed by Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques, providing reference for the medical and industrial use of C. officinalis as a bioenergy source. EXPERIMENTAL Experimental Materials The nutlets of Cornus officinalis were obtained from Xixia County Forest Farm, Nanyang City, Henan Province, China. The nutlets were dried, and it was confirmed that the pulp residues in the nutlets had been removed. The nutlets were extracted using four solvents (ethanol, methanol, ethanol/benzene (1:1), and ethanol/methanol (1:1)) and were named B1, B2, B3, and B4, as shown in Table 1. Then 20 g of CON powder was weighed for each, and organic solvent extraction was used to obtain the extracts. The amount of organic solvent was 300 mL, the extraction time was 4 hours, and the extraction temperature was 78 ℃ (B1), 64 ℃ (B2), 80 ℃ (B3), and 70 ℃ (B4). Finally, a rotary evaporator was used to concentrate the solution to 30 mL to obtain the extracts. The experimental process is shown in Fig. 1. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6413 Table 1. Optimization of Experimental Program No. Solvent M (g) B1 C2H5OH 20.08 B2 CH3OH 20.23 B3 C6H6/C2H5OH (1:1) 20.57 B4 CH3OH/ C2H5OH (1:1) 20.31 Fig. 1. Experimental flow chart FT-IR The samples were analyzed with a Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) using KBr discs containing 1.00% finely ground sample (Jiang et al. 2017; Peng et al. 2017a). TGA-DTG The CON powder was examined with a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA Q50 V20.8 Build 34; TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The nitrogen release rate was 60 mL/min. The TG temperature program began at 30 ℃ temperature and increased to 300 ℃ at a rate of 5 ℃/min. PY-GC-MS The powder of CON was analyzed by thermal cracking-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (CDS5000-Agilent7890B-5977A; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The carrier gas used high purity helium, the pyrolysis temperature was 500 ℃, the heating rate was 20 ℃/ms, and the pyrolysis time was 15 s. The pyrolysis product transfer line and the injection valve temperature were set to 300 ℃. A capillary column HP-5MS was used (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm), and shunt mode was used with a split ratio of 1:60 and shunt rate of 50 mL/min. The temperature of the GC program began at 40 ℃ for 2 min, increased to 120 ℃ at a rate of 5 ℃/min, and then increased to 200 ℃ at a rate of 10 ℃/min for 15 min. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6414 GC-MS The components of CON were analyzed by a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) instrument (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A quartz capillary column was used (30 mm×0.25 mm×0.25 μm) with the starting temperature at 50 ℃, and then the temperature was increased at a rate of 8 ℃/min up to 250 ℃ without retention, with a subsequent rate of 5 ℃/min to 300 ℃ without retention. The temperature of the inlet was 250 ℃, the column flow was 1.0 mL/min, the split ratio was 20:1, and the carrier gas used was high purity helium. For MS, the ionization mode was EI, the electron energy was 70 eV, the temperature of the ion source was 230 ℃, the temperature of the quadrupole was 150 ℃, and the starting point of the scan was 30 to 600 amu. NMR A Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Polarimeter (Agilent-400 MR; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used, and the solvent was Methanol-d4. One NMR probe was used to determine 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and 2D-NMR. The conditions were as follows: 1H-NMR: duration 1.000 s, pulse 45 degrees, sample-and-hold time 2.556 s, pulse width 6410.3 Hz, and 1H-NMR frequency 399.79 MHz. 13C-NMR: duration 1.000 s, pulse 45 degrees, sample and hold time 1.311 s, pulse width 25000.0 Hz, 13C-NMR frequency 100.53 MHz, hydrogen decoupling frequency 399.79 MHz, and power 38 dB. 2D-HSQC: duration 1.000 s, sample and hold time 0.150 s, two pulse widths 4807.7 Hz and 20105.6 Hz, frequency of 2D-HSQC 399.79 MHz, frequency of carbon decoupling 100.54 MHz, and power 38 dB (Lu et al. 2011; Albrecht-Schmitt 2012; Chow et al. 2014; Zabow et al. 2015; Wu et al. 2017). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Chemical Composition of CON extracts FT-IR analysis Figure 2 shows the infrared contrast spectra of CON from the four extracts (Shenderova et al. 2011; Kaznowska et al. 2017; Koo et al. 2018). The absorption peaks in the infrared spectrum of 3400 cm-1 or more may be stretching vibrations or anti- telescopic vibrations of free hydroxyl groups in liquid water. The absorption peak is due to the intermolecular association near the broad peak at 3420 to 3300 cm-1. Absorption peaks at 3030 cm-1 are formed by the stretching vibration of saturated C-H bonds. The absorption peak at 2925 cm-1 may be formed by antisymmetric stretching of the CH2 group. The absorption peak at 2380 to 2300 cm-1 is formed by the antisymmetric expansion of CO2. The absorption peak at 1750 to 1650 cm-1 is due to the C=O double bond stretching vibration. The absorption peak at 1450 cm-1 is due to the CH3 asymmetric corner vibration formation. The absorption peak at 1200 cm-1 is the C-O-C antiscathetic stretching of the ester species. The absorption peak at 1100 cm-1 is due to the symmetric and antisymmetric C-O-C stretching of esters and ethers, respectively. The absorption peak at 940 cm -1 may be formed by out-of-plane bending of COH. The absorption peaks of cellulose (at 2950 cm-1), hemicellulose (1730 cm-1), and lignin (1739 cm-1, 1630 cm-1, and 878 cm-1) were slightly decreased in the chemical composition tested, indicating that hydrolysis occurred in part of it (Xu et al. 2013, Hu et al. 2014; Ge et al. 2018). The absorption peaks of the extracts are mainly concentrated in the bands of 3700 to 3000 cm-1, 3000 to 2850 cm-1, and PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6415 1690 to 870 cm-1. The main chemical components were esters, aldehydes, ethers, fatty acids, hydrocarbons, and aromatics. In addition, the characteristic absorption peaks decreased, indicating partial extraction of esters, alcohols, ethers, fatty acids, hydrocarbons, and aromatics (Bassilakis et al. 2001; Peng et al. 2017b; Jiang et al. 2018). Fig. 2. FT-IR spectra of samples B1, B2, B3, and B4 GC-MS analysis The total ion chromatograms of four types of extractives analyzed by GC-MS are shown in Figs. 3 through 6. The spectrum of each peak was retrieved using a computer and the wiley7n.1 standard spectrum. The peak area normalization method was used to calculate the content of each component, and specific results are shown in Tables S1 through S4. Fig. 3. Total ion chromatograms of ethanol extract from CON PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6416 Fig. 4. Total ion chromatograms of a methanol extract of CON Fig. 5. Total ion chromatograms of ethanol/benzene extract from CON Fig. 6. Total ion chromatograms of ethanol/methanol extract from CON PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6417 Fig. 7. Distribution of samples B1, B2, B3, and B4 after GC-MS analysis According to the results of GC-MS analysis, 93 peaks were detected in B1, and 93 chemical constituents were identified. The results show that the content of more substances were as follows: 3-Furaldehyde (9.21%), Maleic anhydride (4.44%), 4H-Pyran-4-one,2,3- dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl- (1.46%), 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (16.48%), Malic acid (7.08%), 4-Ethylbiphenyl (2.93%), 1,2,3-Benzenetriol (16.61%), Vanillin (1.82%), Spiro[4.5]decan-7-one, 1,8-dimethyl-8,9-epoxy-4-isopropyl- (2.58%), 9,12- Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- (2.30 %), Ethylamine, N,N-diheptyl-2-(2-thiophenyl)- (1.88 %), octamethyl-Cyclotetrasiloxane, (1.37 %), and 4-butoxy-1,1'-Biphenyl (1.53 %). According to the results of the GC-MS analysis, 65 peaks were detected in B2, and 65 chemical constituents were identified. The results show that the content of more substances were as follows: 3-Furaldehyde(7.29%), Maleic anhydride(5.25%), 4H-Pyran- 4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-(1.95%), 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural(17.34%), Malic acid(4.29%), 4-Ethylbiphenyl(5.25%), 1,2,3-Benzenetriol(23.46%), Vanillin (1.25%),Spiro[4.5]decan-7-one, 1,8-dimethyl-8,9-epoxy-4-isopropyl- (1.58%), 1H- Benzo[d,E]phthalazine, 6-methoxy-1,3-dimethyl- (2.48%), 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- (2.21%), 6H-Dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one, 7,9-dihydroxy-3-methoxy-1-methyl- (1.16%), 4-Methyl-2,4-bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene, 2TMS derivative (1.77%), 4- Methyl-2,4-bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene and 2TMS derivative(1.54%). According to the results of GC-MS analysis, 66 peaks were detected in B3, and 59 chemical constituents were identified. The results show that the content of more substances were as follows: Furfural (6.88%), 1H-Imidazole, 1,2-dimethyl- (2.37%), Levoglucosenone (2%), 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (18%), Malic acid (3.92%), 1,2- Cyclobutanedicarboxylic acid, trans- (2.16%), 1,2,3-Benzenetriol (10.13%), Benzaldehyde, 3-hydroxy-4-methoxy- (3.31%), 2-(4'-Methoxymethylbiphenyl-4- yl)propan-2-ol (1.97%), 2-Acetoxy-3,3-dimethyl-2-(3-oxo-but-1-enyl)- cyclobutanecarboxylic acid, methyl ester (5.34%), N-2,4-Dnp-L-arginine (2.30%), 9,12- PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6418 Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-(11.92%) and Heptasiloxane, 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11,13,13- tetradecamethyl- (3.76%). According to the results of GC-MS analysis, 43 peaks were detected in B4, and 39 chemical constituents were identified. The results show that the content of more substances were as follows:3-Furaldehyde (6.16%), Maleic anhydride (7.45%), 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3- dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl- (1.44%), 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (18.87%), Thiophene, 2-propyl-(1.66%),1,2,3-Benzenetriol (32.63%), 2-Acetoxy-3,3-dimethyl-2- (3-oxo-but-1-enyl)-cyclobutanecarboxylic acid, methyl ester (2.39%),2,5-dimethoxy-4- ethylthio-benzaldehyde (6.42%), 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- (3.06%) and Octasiloxane, 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11,13,13,15,15-hexadecamethyl- (1.54%). Figure 7 shows that there were different distributions of the retention time of different components from the hawthorn kernel. For B1 sample, 18%, 55%, 19%, and 8% sample retention times were less than 10, 20, and 30 min, and greater than 30 min, respectively. For B2 sample, 18%, 60%, 10%, and 12% of the sample components had retention times less than 10, 20, and 30 min, and retention times greater than 30 min, respectively. For B3 sample, 16%, 51%, 26%, and 7% sample components retained retention times of less than 10, 20, and 30 min and greater than 30 min, respectively. For B4 sample, the 20%, 63%, 12%, and 5% sample retention times were less than 10, 20, and 30 min, and greater than 30 min, respectively (de Jong et al. 2018; Wan-Ibrahim et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2018). Analysis of NMR spectra The 1H-NMR spectrum is the most widely used nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum. As the hydrogen core has a large magnetic spin ratio γ, its magnetic properties are strong, the detection sensitivity is high, and the signal is easy to observe (Lanza et al. 2010). There are a large number of hydrogen atoms in different chemical environments of organic compounds, and therefore, the 1H-NMR spectrum can provide important structural information for many organic compounds (Fig. 8) (Feigenson and Meers 1980; Martin et al. 2008; Maulidiani et al. 2018; Pinto et al. 2018). The chemical shifts of protons are mainly distributed in the alkane compounds saturated at δ 0.6 to δ 1.6. At other locations, the peak of δ 3.34 should be the CD3OD solvent peak. The first proton occurs at a δ value of approximately 1.15 pm, and the chemical shift value at this position should be the alkane proton(-C-C-H). The first proton moves slightly to the right and appears at a delta value of approximately 1.3 ppm. Near the delta value of 3.3 to 3.6 ppm, the solvent peak of CH3OH is predominant. Proton chemical shifts on carbon atoms directly attached to the halogen also occur at this position. The chemical shifts of the protons on α-C in the vicinity of the carbonyl or cyanide groups are 2 to 3 μm with an anisotropic effect on C=C and the sp2 hybridization of olefinic carbons. The chemical shift of olefinic compounds is within 4.5- 6 μm. When change occurs, coupled with aryl, the value of δ will increase; the peak is most obvious at δ5.3 and δ7.0. The chemical shift of α-H in the hydrogen atom of the ether molecule is approximately 3.5 ppm. The δ value of the hydroxyl proton is approximately 4 to 8 ppm. The chemical shift of the aromatic compound is in the range of 6.3 to 8.5, and the value of the heterocyclic aromatic proton is within the range of 6.0 to 9.0. Based on the peaks of the specific chemical shifts shown by the 1H-NMR spectrum, additional compounds from CON can be roughly determined. Carbon makes up the skeleton of organic molecules. The importance of 13C NMR analysis to chemical research is clearly recognized. The chemical shift of 1H NMR is usually in the range of 0 to 15 ppm, while the usual range of 13C NMR is 0 to 300 ppm, PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6419 which is approximately 20 times that of 1H (De Feyter et al. 2018; Lusk and Gullion 2018; Tang et al. 2018). In the 1H NMR, it is not directly observed that the absorption signal of hydrogen groups such as C=O, C=C, and C=N can be clear, given their characteristic absorption peak by 13C NMR. Figure 9 is a study of the structural change of a sample using 13C-NMR spectroscopy. Between 10 and 50 ppm, mainly chemical bond shifts of saturated alkanes occur. As can be seen from the figure, the first proton appears at a δ value of approximately 18 ppm. The chemical shift value at this position should be the alkane proton-(CH2)-CH3. The second proton shifts back, showing a δ value of 40 ppm. Where possible, the chemical bond at this location should be an alkane containing the N element. For carbohydrate polymer carbon, all important signals are generally distributed in the 50- 110 ppm region (Xue et al. 2014). The chemical shift value of the alkyne alkynyl carbon should be near 69 ppm and 78 ppm, and the chemical bonds present are predominantly - C=C-bonds. The chemical shift value of the olefinic carbon is between 100 and 120 ppm. The chemical bonds at the peaks of 98 ppm and 110 ppm are -HC-CH-. The chemical shift values of the aromatic ring carbons and heteroaromatic ring carbons are generally in the range of 120 to 160 ppm, and peaks tend to appear in lower fields. A peak appeared at 145 ppm, which may be the chemical shift values of benzene and its derivatives. Among the hydroxy compounds, because the electron density of the π-bonds in C=O is small, the chemical shift value tends to be lower in the field, and the δ value generally appears between 160 and 220 ppm. The peak appears at 172 ppm and 176 ppm and is probably a hydroxycarbon compound (Sharma and Rajarathnam 2000; Cimino et al. 2004; Xie et al. 2017; Gurjar and Kaur 2018). 2D-HSQC is one of the most common two-dimensional NMR spectra. It provides information on 1H nucleus and 13C nucleus single bonds and is of great significance for structural analysis (Moniz et al. 2018; Xiao et al. 2018; Yao et al. 2018). It is also available in 1H and 13C-NMR spectra. The resolution of overlapping signals reveals the link between these two aromatic units (Shupe et al. 2012; Fu et al. 2017; Fakeeha et al. 2018; Khan et al. 2018). To obtain further information on the structural characterization of methanol/ethanol samples, 2D-HSQC NMR analysis was performed. The aliphatic region (δC/δH 10–40/0.5–2.5), side chain (δC/δH 50–95/2.5–6.0), and the aromatic (δC/δH 95– 150/5.5–8.0) region of the HSQC spectra of the sample are shown in Figure 10. Additionally, δC/δH 110/6.97, δC/δH 120/6.8, δC /δH 114/6.7, δC/δH 104/6.68, δC/δH 72/4.82, and δC/δH 86/4.19 illustrate the interconnected hydrogen and carbon. As shown by 2D-HSQC NMR, δC/δH 15-45/0.2–1.5 are a hydrocarbon-saturated hydrocarbon connection. δC/δH 55-75/4.5–6.5,1.7-3.5 are mainly the carbon spectra of some alkynes and some of the olefins. δC/δH 110-140/6.3–8.3, 4.5–6.5 are predominantly aromatic and olefinic carbons. δC/δH 60-80/3.1–4 are alcohols, ethers, phenols, and other oxygen- containing compounds. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6420 Fig. 8. 1H-NMR spectra of the sample Fig. 9. 13C-NMRspectra of the sample PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6421 Fig. 10. 2D-HSQC NMR spectra of CON Medicinal properties The compounds identified in Tables S2 to S5 in the Appendix are also classified as esters, acids, phenols, tannins, iridoids, soaps, ketones, and glycosides. Among them, CON exhibits immunostimulant activity, and glycosides exhibit immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory effects. The iridoid glycosidesin from CON can reduce the serum levels of ICAM-1 and TNF-α in the vascular complication model of diabetic rats, thus resulting in the hypoglycemic effect of total terpenes in CON (Hong et al. 2003; Han et al. 2006; Hu et al. 2009). In addition, iridoid glycosides may inhibit thrombosis by changing the state of hypercoagulability of the blood and provide a good experimental basis for the prevention and treatment of thrombotic diseases. CON contains polyphenolic compounds, one of which is an ortho-phenolic hydroxyl that can be easily oxidized, and the active oxygen and other free radicals have a strong ability to be captured, making it a strong antioxidant and scavenger of free radicals. Maleic anhydride is an important basic raw material for unsaturated organic acid anhydride. It is used in pesticide production to synthesize organic phosphorus pesticides. Maleic anhydride is also used to produce unsaturated polyester resin, papermaking auxiliary, coatings, and pharmaceutical industry (Popadyuk et al. 2013). 5-Hydroxymethylfural (5-HMF) is an important furan compound. Because of its excellent chemical properties, it is widely used in medicine, chemistry, energy and other fields. Its derivatives have significant application prospects in fine chemicals, medicine, degradable plastics and other fields (Atanda et al. 2016). These active ingredients from CON are the same or similar to those reported in the COF (Gang et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2013; He et al. 2019). Behavior during Combustion of CONs TGA and DTG analysis The thermal stability of CON is largely responsible for its excellent flame-retardant properties, but it also determines the broad application prospects (Salasinska et al. 2020). PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6422 Thermal stability analysis is an effective method to evaluate the flame retardancy and industrial applications of CON (Xie et al. 2011; Renneckar et al. 2004). Figure 11 shows the TGA curve and DTG curves of CON. According to Fig. 11, T5wt.% and T10wt.% are at 157 ℃ and 234 ℃, respectively. There are three stages in the process of weight loss. The first stage is 20 to 106 ℃, when small molecules with low moisture content and boiling point undergo evaporation. The weight loss during this stage is 4.6%. The second stage is 106 to 200 ℃. As long as the material component is slightly cracked, the weight loss is only 3%. The third stage is 200 to 300 ℃. At this decomposition stage, the organic matter of the components has undergone severe cracking with increasing temperature and the burning of other components. The content of the material has been reduced from 93.5% to 73.9%. The DTG curve at this stage is constantly increasing, indicating that the rate of material weight loss is also increasing (Dochia et al. 2018; Guo et al. 2019). The three phases showed different properties and phenomena, with different kinetic parameters and reaction mechanisms, with a final residual mass of 73.9% (Rukthong et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2018; Lou et al. 2018). Between 20 and 250 ℃, CON showed a thermal weight of approximately 13 wt.%, and the weight loss was low, especially before 200 ℃. The weight loss was only 6.5%, indicating that CON had good thermal stability. Throughout the TG experimental tests, CON demonstrated good thermal stability within 200 ℃, indicating that it has excellent processing properties, and good prospects for research and industrial use. Fig. 11. TGA and DTG thermal curves for CON Py-GC-MS analysis The total ion chromatograms of CON by Py-GC-MS are shown in Fig. 12 and the relative content of each component has been counted by area normalization (Lan and Peng 2012; Peng et al. 2012). The MS data was analyzed using the NIST standard MS map and publicly published books and articles, and then identifying each component. The analytical results are listed in Table S5. According to the results of the Py-GC-MS analysis, 241 peaks were detected in Table 6, and 241 chemical constituents were identified. The results show that the content PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6423 of more substances are as follows: 4-methyl-2-Hexanamine (2.82%), Glycidol (1.33%), Formic acid (1.13%), Acetic acid (8.72%), Furfural (2.78%), 1,2-Cyclopentanedione (1.06%), 2,2-diethyl-3-methyl-Oxazolidine (1.02%), 2-Methyliminoperhydro-1,3-oxazine (1.07%), 2-methoxy-Phenol (2.21%), Creosol (1.95%), Catechol (1.67%), 5- Hydroxymethylfurfural (2.07%), 2-Methoxy-4-vinylphenol (2.55%), 2,6-dimethoxy- Phenol (1.87%), 1,2,3-Benzenetriol (1.29%), Vanillin (1.81%), 3,5-Dimethoxy-4- hydroxytoluene (1.55%), trans-Isoeugenol (1.52%), 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2- Propanone (1.11%), (E)-Stilbene (3.27%), D-Allose (1.95%), 1,6-anhydro-.beta.-D- Glucopyranose (1.67%), (E)-2,6-Dimethoxy-4-(prop-1-en-1-yl)phenol (1.12%), and n- Hexadecanoic acid (1.31%). As shown in Fig. 13, there was a different distribution of retention times for the different components of CON. The retention times of 22%, 18%, 48%, and 12% for the sample component content were less than 10, 20, and 30 min and greater than 30 min, respectively. The molecular weight increases occurred in sample retention times greater than 30 min, 10-20 min, less than 10 min, and 20-30 min, with a higher molecular weight content than the other retention times in the 20-30 min retention period (Toraman et al. 2017; Dziwiński et al. 2018; Fang et al. 2018; Yu et al. 2018). Glycidol obtained by pyrolysis contains epoxy group and hydroxyl group. It has active chemical properties and can carry out many ring opening reactions. Glycidol is hydrolyzed to generate glycerol, and propylene glycol is generated through catalytic hydrogenation, which is condensed with alcohols to generate glycerol ether (Bakhiya et al. 2011). It is often used in surface coatings, chemical synthesis, production of fungicides and so on. Another pyrolysis product, Vanillin, is the first essence synthesized by human beings. As an important edible flavor, Vanillin is used in almost all flavor types and is widely used in the food industry. In addition, the application of Vanillin in the medical field has been continuously expanded in recent years and has become the most potential field for Vanillin application (Abraham et al. 1991; Fitzgerald et al. 2004). The content of organic and inorganic substances in biomass combustion process determines whether it can be used as a good biofuel. The higher the inorganic content in the combustion process, the more unfavorable the element occurrence mode (chloride, sulfate, carbonate, oxalate, nitrate and some hydroxide, phosphate) (Vassilev and Vassileva 2016). The application and processing of these biofuels will lead to environmentally challenging thermochemical conversion. However, the main components of the detected from CON were esters, acids, phenols, anthraquinones and ketones, and the content of inorganic salts was relatively low (Table S5). By analyzing the main functions and functions of different compounds, CON can be more effectively and fully utilized. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6424 Fig. 12. Total ion chromatograms of CON by Py-GC-MS Fig. 13. Distribution characteristic of CON by Py-GC-MS CONCLUSIONS 1. The absorbance peaks of the extract of Cornus officinalis nutshells (CONs) were concentrated in the 3700 to 3000 cm-1, 3000 to 2850 cm-1, and 1690 to 870 cm-1 bands. The decrease in the characteristic absorption peak indicates that the esters, alcohols, ethers, fatty acids, hydrocarbons, and aromatic compounds had been partially extracted. By the identification using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) tests, PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6425 more than 60 kinds of chemical active ingredients were detected, which can play a certain role in immune regulation, hypoglycemia, inhibition of thrombosis formation, and anti-oxidation. 2. Through the research and analysis of the extract of CON, it was determined that the seed also has the same important medical value as the pulp, and has great application prospects in medicine and food. 3. In addition, in the CON extracts, many organic substances were the same or homologous to biomass oil, and the residue after the active ingredient is extracted can be used as a biomass liquid fuel. It may be possible to use it in place of fossil energy sources. After the above analysis, we want to provide the scientific basis for CON to become a high-quality resource. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was supported by the Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Henan Province (No. 21IRTSTHN020), and Central Plain Scholar Funding Project of Henan Province (No. 212101510005). Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships. REFERENCES CITED Abraham, D. J., Mehanna, A. S., Wireko, F. C., Whitney, J., and Orringer, E. P. (1991). “Vanillin, a potential agent for the treatment of sickle cell anemia,” Blood 77(6), 1334-1341. DOI: 10.1182/blood.V77.6.1334.1334 Albrecht-Schmitt, T. E. (2012). “NMR tools for determining the structure of plutonium materials,” Science 336(6083), 811-812. DOI: 10.1126/science.1222927 Atanda, L., Konarova, M., Ma, Q., Mukundan, S., Shrotri, A., and Beltramini, J. (2016). “High yield conversion of cellulosic biomass into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and a study of the reaction kinetics of cellulose to HMF conversion in a biphasic system,” Catalysis Science & Technology 6(16), 6257-6266. DOI: 10.1039/c6cy00820h Bakhiya, N., Abraham, K., Gürtler, R., Appel, K. E., and Lampen, A., (2011). “Toxicological assessment of 3‐chloropropane‐1,2‐diol and glycidol fatty acid esters in food,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 55(4), 509-521. DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201000550 Bassilakis, R., Carangelo, R. M., and Wójtowicz, M. A. (2001). “TG-FTIR analysis of biomass pyrolysis,” Fuel 80(12), 1765-1786. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00061-8 Chen, Y. H., Feng, J. C., Zheng, X. B., Li, J. D., Wu, Y. X., Bi, H. T. (2012). “Development and prospects of researches on Cornus officinalis,” Nonwood Forest Research 30(1), 143-150. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8981.2012.01.029 Chow, W. Y., Rajan, R Muller, K. H., Reid, D. G., Skepper, J. N., Wong, W. C., Brooks, R. A., Green, M., Bihan, D., Farndale, R. W., Slatter, D. A., Shanahan, C. M., and Duer, M. J. (2014). “NMR spectroscopy of native and in vitro tissues implicates PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6426 polyADP ribose in biomineralization,” Science 344(6185), 742-746. DOI: 10.1126/science.1248167 Cimino, P., Gomez-Paloma, L., Duca, D., Riccio, R., and Bifulco, G. (2004). “Comparison of different theory models and basis sets in the calculation of 13C NMR chemical shifts of natural products,” Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry 42, S26-S33. DOI: 10.1002/mrc.1410 De Feyter, H. M., Herzog, R. I., Steensma, B. R., Klomp, D. W. J., Brown, P. B., Mason, G. F., Rothman, D. L., and de Graaf, R. A. (2018). “Selective proton-observed, carbon-edited (selPOCE) MRS method for measurement of glutamate and glutamine, C-13-labeling in the human frontal cortex,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 80(1), 11-20. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27003 de Jong, W. H. A., Buitenwerf, E., Pranger, A. T., Riphagen, I. J., Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R., Kerstens, M. N., and Kema, I. P. (2018). “Determination of reference intervals for urinary steroid profiling using a newly validated GC-MS/MS method,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 56(1), 103-112. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2016-1072 Dochia, M., Chambre, D., Gavrilas, S., and Moisa, C. (2018). “Characterization of the complexing agents’ influence on bioscouring cotton fabrics by FT-IR and TG/DTG/DTA analysis,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 132(3), 1489- 1498. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-018-7089-y Dziwiński, E. J., Ilowska, J., and Gniady, J. (2018). “Py-GC/MS analyses of poly(ethylene terephthalate) film without and with the presence of tetramethyl- ammonium acetate reagent. Comparative study,” Polymer Testing 65, 111-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.11.009 Fakeeha, A. H., Ibrahim, A. A., Khan, W. U., Seshan, K., Al Otaibi, R. L., Al-Fatesh, A. S. (2018). “Hydrogen production via catalytic methane decomposition over alumina supported iron catalyst,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry 11(3), 405-414. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.06.012 Fang, S. W., Yu, Z. S., Ma, X. Q., Lin, Y., Chen, L., and Liao, Y. F. (2018). “Analysis of catalytic pyrolysis of municipal solid waste and paper sludge using TG-FTIR, Py- GC/MS and DAEM (distributed activation energy model),” Energy 143, 517-532. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.038 Feigenson, G. W., and Meers, P. R. (1980). “1H NMR study of valinomycin conformation in a phospholipid bilayer,” Nature 283(5744), 313-314. DOI: 10.1038/283313a0 Fitzgerald, D. J., Stratford, M, Gasson, M. J., Ueckert, J., and Narbad, A. (2004). “Mode of antimicrobial action of vanillin against Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Listeria innocua,” Journal of Applied Microbiology 97(1), 104-113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02275.x Fu, H. L., and Liu, X. J. (2017). “Research on the phenomenon of Chinese residents' spiritual contagion for the reuse of recycled water based on SC-IAT,” Water 9(11), DOI: 10.3390/w9110846 Gang, C., Hao, C., Cai, B., and Tu, S. (2013). “Effect of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural derived from processed Cornus officinalis on the prevention of high glucose-induced oxidative stress in human umbilical vein endothelial cells and its mechanism,” Food Chemistry 140(1-2), 273-279. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.143 Ge, S. B., Gu, H. P., Ma, J. J., Yang, H. Q., Jiang, S. C., Liu, Z. L., and Peng, W. X. (2018). “Potential use of different kinds of carbon in production of decayed wood PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6427 plastic composite,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry 11(6), 838-843. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.12.026 Gurjar, D. S., and Kaur, R. (2018). “Impact of wastewater irrigations and planting methods on leaf firing, colour, quality and traffic tolerance of turfgrass,” Journal of Environmental Biology 39(1), 117-121. DOI: 10.22438/jeb/39/1/MRN-662 Guo, H. Q., Wu, H., Yang, N. N., Fu, Q., Liu, F. R., Zhang, H., Hu, R. S., and Hu, Y. F. (2019). “XAS combined with TG–DTG study on synergic effect on sulfur transformation during co-pyrolysis of sawdust and lignite,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 135(4), 2475-2480. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-018-7259-y Han, Z. H., Cao, W. H., Xin-Bao, L. I., and Liu, G. J. (2006). “Analysis of chemical composition of essential oil in Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc by GC-MS,” Fine Chemicals 23(2), 130-129. DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(06)60051-9 He, J., Xu, J. K., Pan, X. G., Ye, X. S., Gao, P. Y., Yan, Y., Xu, C. Y., Qiang, G. F., Du, G. H., and Cheng, Y. C. (2019). “Unusual cadinane-type sesquiterpene glycosides with α-glucosidase inhibitory activities from the fruit of Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc,” Bioorganic Chemistry 82, 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.09.026 Hong, W. U., Liang H., and Liu Y. H. (2003). “Extraction and determination of total saponins from Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc,” Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University 24(5), 430-432. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022080713267 Hu, J. G., Liu Y. L., Song J. Q., and Zhang, L. (2009). “Analysis of aroma components in fruit of Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc by GC-MS,” Journal of Northwest A and F University 194-198. Hu, S. W., Shima, T., and Hou, Z. M. (2014). “Carbon-carbon bond cleavage and rearrangement of benzene by a trinuclear titanium hydride,” Nature 512(7515), DOI: 10.1038/nature13624 Jiang, S. C., Ge, S. B., Wu, X., Yang, Y. M., Chen, J. T., and Peng, W. X. (2017). “Treating n-butane by activated carbon and metal oxides,” Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry 99(5-6), 753-759. DOI: 10.1080/02772248.2017.1279432 Jiang, S. C., Ge, S. B., and Peng, W. X. (2018). “Molecules and functions of rosewood: Dalbergia stevenson,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry 11(6), 782-792. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.12.032. Kaznowska, E., Depciuch, J., Szmuc, K., and Cebulski, J. (2017). “Use of FTIR spectroscopy and PCA-LDC analysis to identify cancerous lesions within the human colon,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 134, 259-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.11.047 Khan, A. M., Yusoff, I., Abu Bakar, N. K., Abu Bakar, A. F., Alias, Y., and Mispan, M. S. (2018). “Accumulation, uptake and bioavailability of rare earth elements (Rees) in soil grown plants from ex-mining area in Perak, Malaysia,” Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 15(3), 117-133. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1503_117133 Koo, B. M., Dalla Corte, D. A., Chazalviel, J. N., Maroun, F., Rosso, M., and Ozanam, F. (2018). “Lithiation mechanism of methylated amorphous silicon unveiled by Operando ATR‐FTIR spectroscopy,” Advanced Energy Materials 8(13), DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201702568 Lan, S. W., and Peng, W.X. (2012). “Py-GC-MS analysis on biomass energy components from wood extractives of Eucalyptus urophydis under high temperature,” Applied Mechanics and Materials 164, 30-32. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.164.30 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6428 Lanza, I. R., Zhang, S. C., Ward, L. E., Karakelides, H., Raftery, D., and Nair, K. S. (2010). “Quantitative metabolomics by H-NMR and LC-MS/MS confirms altered metabolic pathways in diabetes,” Plos One 5(5), DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010538 Liu, L. L., Cheng, X. X., Zhao, W. W., Wang, Y. H., Dong, X., Chen, L. L., Zhang, D. Q., and Peng, W. X. (2018). “Systematic characterization of volatile organic components and pyrolyzates from Camellia oleifera seed cake for developing high value-added products,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry 11(6), 802-814. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.12.031 Lou, J. W., Chen, J. T., Ni, C. Y., and Peng, W. X. (2018). “Molecules and functions of rosewood: Pterocarpus cambodianus,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry 11(6), 763-770. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.12.030 Lu, K., Heng, X., Garyu, L., Monti, S., Garcia, E. L., Kharytonchyk, S., Dorjsuren, B., Kulandaivel, G., Jones, S., Hiremath, A., Divakaruni, S. S., LaCotti, C., Barton, S., Tummillo, D., Hosic, A., Edme, K., Albrecht, S., Telesnitsky, A., and Summers, M. F. (2011). “NMR detection of structures in the HIV-1 5'-leader RNA that regulate genome packaging,” Science 334(6053), 242-245. DOI: 10.1126/science.1210460 Lusk, G., and Gullion, T. (2018). “Description of an RF field-strength controller for solid-state NMR experiments,” Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance 91, 9-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2018.01.002 Martin, M., Legat, B., Leenders, J., Vanwinsberghe, J., Rousseau, R., Boulanger, B., Eilers, P. H. C., De Tullio, P., Govaerts, B. (2018). “PepsNMR for 1H NMR metabolomic data pre-processing,” Analytica Chimica Acta 1019, 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.02.067 Maulidiani, M., Mediani, A., Abas, F., Park, Y. S., Park, Y. K., Kim, Y. M., and Gorinstein, S. (2018). “1H NMR and antioxidant profiles of polar and non-polar extracts of persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.) - Metabolomics study based on cultivars and origins,” Talanta 184, 277-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.02.084 Moniz, P., Serralheiro, C., Matos C. T., Boeriu, C. G., Frissen, A. E., Duarte, L. C., Roseiro, L. B., Pereira, H., and Carvalheiro, F. (2018). “Membrane separation and characterisation of lignin-derived products obtained by a mild ethanol organosolv treatment of rice straw,” Process Biochemistry 65, 136-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2017.11.012 Peng, W. X., Wang, L. S., Lin, Z., and Zheng, Z. Z. (2012). “Py-GC-MS analysis on benzene-alcohol extractives of Eucalyptus urophydis wood for fine indoor environment,” Applied Mechanics and Materials 178-181, 288-291. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.178-181.288 Peng, W. X., Xue, Q., and Ohkoshi, M. (2017a). “Immune effects of extractives on bamboo biomass self-plasticization,” Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 27(4), 991-999. DOI: 10.4314/tjpr.v13i7.24 Peng, W. X., Li, D. L., Zhang, M. L., Ge, S. B., Mo, B., Li, S. S., and Ohkoshi, M. (2017b). “Characteristics of antibacterial molecular activities in poplar wood extractives,” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 24(2), 399-404. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.10.026 Pinto, J., Oliveira, A. S., Azevedo, J., De Freitas, V., Lopes, P., Roseira, I., Cabral, M., and de Pinho, P. G. (2018). “Assessment of oxidation compounds in oaked Chardonnay wines: A GC-MS and 1H NMR metabolomics approach,” Food Chemistry 257, 120-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.156 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6429 Renneckar, S., Zink-Sharp, A. G., Ward, T. C., and Glasser, W. G. (2004). “Compositional analysis of thermoplastic wood composites by TGA,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science 93(3), 1484-1492. DOI: 10.1002/app.20599 Popadyuk, A., Tarnavchyk, I., Popadyuk, N., Kohut, A., Samaryk, V., Voronov, S., and Voronov, A. (2013). “A novel copolymer of n-[(tert-butylperoxy)methyl]acrylamide and maleic anhydride for use as a reactive surfactant in emulsion polymerization,” Reactive & Functional Polymers 73(9), 1290-1298. DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.07.002. Rukthong, W., Thanatawee, P., Sunphorka, S., Piumsomboon, P., and Piumsomboon, P. (2015). “Computation of biomass combustion characteristic and kinetic parameters by using thermogravimetric analysis,” Engineering Journal-Thailand 19(2), 41-57. DOI: 10.4186/ej.2015.19.2.41 Salasinska, K., Gajek, A., M Celiński, Mizera, K., and Duszak, K. (2020). “Thermal stability of epoxy resin modified with developed flame retardant system based on renewable raw materials,” Materials Science Forum 995, 43-48. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.995.43 Sharma, D., and Rajarathnam, K. (2000). “13C NMR chemical shifts can predict disulfide bond formation,” Journal of Biomolecular NMR 18(2), 165-171. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008398416292 Shenderova, O., Panich, A. M., Moseenkov, S., Hens, S. C., Kuznetsov, V., and Vieth, H. M. (2011). “Hydroxylated detonation nanodiamond: FTIR, XPS, and NMR studies,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 115(39), 19005-19011. DOI: 10.1021/jp205389m Shupe, A. M., Kiemle, D. J., and Liu, S. (2012). “Quantitative 2D HSQC NMR analysis of mixed wood sugars in hemicellulosic hydrolysate fermentation broth,” Journal of Bioprocess Engineering and Biorefinery 1(1), 93-100. DOI: 10.1166/jbeb.2012.1007 Tan, F., Liu, Q. L., Zhang, Y. J., Yang, L. Z. and Hu, M. (2006). “Effects of Huanshaodan on the activity of GSH - Px and the content of MDA in rat,” Guiding Journal of TCM 12(7), 12-15. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-951X.2006.07.001 Tang, R. G., Ding, C. F., Dang, F., Ma, Y. B., Wang, J. S., Zhang, T. L., and Wang, X. X. (2018). “NMR-based metabolic toxicity of low-level Hg exposure to earthworms,” Environmental Pollution 239, 428-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.027 Toraman, H. E., Abrahamsson, V., Vanholme, R., Van Acker, R., Ronsse, F., Pilate, G., Boerjan, W., Van Geem, and K. M., Marin, G. B. (2017). “Application of Py-GC/MS coupled with PARAFAC2 and PLS-DA to study fast pyrolysis of genetically engineered poplars,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 129, 101-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2017.11.022 Vassilev, S. V., and Vassileva, C. G. (2016). “Composition, properties and challenges of algae biomass for biofuel application: An overview,” Fuel 181, 1-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.106 Wan-Ibrahim, W. S., Ismail, T. N. N. T., Mohd-Salleh, S. F., and Ismail, N. (2018). “GC- MS analysis of phytochemical compounds in aqueous leaf extract of Abrus precatorius,” Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science 41(1), 241-250. Wang, Y. G., Li, X. R., Jiang, Q. J., Sun, H. N., Jiang, J. F., Chen, S. M., Guan, Z. Y., Fang, W. M., and Chen, F. D. (2018). “GC-MS analysis of the volatile constituents in the leaves of 14 Compositae plants,” Molecules 23(1). DOI: 10.3390/molecules23010166 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6430 Wu, J. J., Lorenzo, P., Zhong, S. Y., Ali, M., Butts, C. P., Myers, E. L., and Aggarwal, V. K. (2017). “Synergy of synthesis, computation and NMR reveals correct baulamycin structures,” Nature 547(7664), 436-440. DOI: 10.1038/nature23265 Xiao, X., Wen, J. Y., Wang, Y. Y., Bian, J., Li, M. F., Peng, F., and Sun, R. C. (2018). “NMR and ESI-MS spectrometry characterization of autohydrolysis xylo- oligosaccharides separated by gel permeation chromatography,” Carbohydrate Polymers 195, 303-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.088 Xie, C. P., Li, K. F., Li, Y., Lin, J. L., and Xu, K. M. (2011). “Study on volatile substances of different provenances teak (Tectona grandis l.f) wood by TGA,” Advanced Materials Research 295-297, 88-92. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.295-297.88 Xie, Y. Z., Ge, S. B., Jiang, S. C., Liu, Z. L., Chen, L., Wang, L. S., Chen, J. T., Qin, L. C., and Peng, W. X. (2017). “Study on biomolecules in extractives of Camellia oleifera fruit shell by GC-MS,” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 25(2), 234-236. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.08.006 Xu, G. Q., Wang, L. H., Liu, J. L., and Wu, J. Z. (2013). “FTIR and XPS analysis of the changes in bamboo chemical structure decayed by white-rot and brown-rot fungi,” Applied Surface Science 280, 799-805. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.05.065 Xue, B. L., Wen, J. L., and Sun R. C. (2014). “Lignin-based rigid polyurethane foam reinforced with pulp fiber: Synthesis and characterization,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2(6), 1474-1480. DOI: 10.1021/sc5001226 Yao, L., Yang, H. T., Yoo, C. G., Meng, X. Z., Pu, Y. Q., Hao, N. J., and Ragauskas, A. J. (2018). “Characteristics of lignin fractions from dilute acid pretreated switchgrass and their effect on cellobiohydrolase from Trichoderma longibrachiatum,” Frontiers in Energy Research 6, DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2018.00001 Yu, Z. S., Dai, M. Q., Huang, M. M., Fang, S. W., Xu, J. C., Lin, Y., and Ma, X. Q. (2018). “Catalytic characteristics of the fast pyrolysis of microalgae over oil shale: Analytical Py-GC/MS study,” Renewable Energy 125, 465-471. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.136 Zabow, G., Dodd, S. J., and Koretsky, A. P. (2015). “Shape-changing magnetic assemblies as high-sensitivity NMR-readable nanoprobes,” Nature 520(7545), 73- U157. DOI: 10.1038/nature14294 Zhang, J. Z., Kang, H. J., Gao, Q., Li, J. Z., Pizzi, A., Delmotte, L. (2015). “Performances of larch (Larix gmelinii) tannin modified urea-formaldehyde (TUF) resin and plywood bonded by TUF resin,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science 131(22), 41064. DOI: 10.1002/app.41064 Zhang, Q. C., Zhao, Y., Bian, H. M. (2013). “Antiplatelet activity of a novel formula composed of malic acid, succinic acid and citric acid from Cornus officinalis fruit,” Phytotherapy Research 27(12), 1894-1896. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.4934 Article submitted: June 9, 2022; Peer review completed: July 30, 2022; Revisions accepted: September 23, 2022; Published: September 29, 2022. DOI: 10.15376/biores.17.4.6411-6444 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6431 APPENDIX (Supplementary Information) Table S1. GC-MS Analysis of Sample B1 No. Retention Time (min) Peak Area (%) Component 1 5.251 9.21 3-Furaldehyde 2 5.466 4.44 Maleic anhydride 3 6.902 0.19 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-methyl- 4 7.11 0.18 2,4-Dihydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furan-3-one 5 8.757 0.19 Thymine 6 8.85 0.91 3-Furancarboxylic acid, methyl ester 7 9.378 0.93 Levoglucosenone 8 9.923 1.46 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl- 9 10.276 0.23 Dehydromevalonic lactone 10 10.389 0.30 2-Butenedioic acid, monoethyl ester 11 11.056 0.19 Benzaldehyde, 4-methyl- 12 11.216 0.52 3-Methyl-2-oxo-2H-pyrane-6-carboxylic acid 13 11.475 16.48 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural 14 11.873 0.19 Butanedioic acid, hydroxy-, diethyl ester, (.+/-.)- 15 12.284 2.73 Malic Acid 16 12.488 0.23 Acetic acid, TBDMS derivative 17 12.58 4.35 Malic Acid 18 12.768 0.36 Ethanone, 1-(2-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)- 19 13.107 0.85 l-Alanine, N-isobutoxycarbonyl-, butyl ester 20 13.611 0.37 Propanoic acid, 3-chloro-, 4-formylphenyl ester 21 13.926 2.93 4-Ethylbiphenyl 22 13.951 0.46 4-Fluorobenzyl alcohol, TBDMS derivative 23 14.01 16.61 1,2,3-Benzenetriol 24 14.257 1.82 Vanillin 25 14.345 0.56 3,5-Dimethyl-1-dimethylphenylsilyloxybenzene 26 15.157 0.25 Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-propyl- 27 15.982 0.18 Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy- 28 16.145 0.53 Carbamic acid, monoammonium salt 29 16.277 0.17 2-Propanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)- 30 16.315 0.22 Tricyclo[3.3.1.1(3,7)]decane-2-ol-1-carboxylic acid, methyl ester 31 16.391 0.21 Homovanillic acid 32 16.836 0.29 3-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzoic acid 33 17.089 0.31 Butyrovanillone PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6432 34 18.025 0.43 Homovanillic acid 35 18.449 0.19 Dodecanoic acid, 1,1-dimethylpropyl ester 36 18.61 2.58 Spiro[4.5]decan-7-one, 1,8-dimethyl-8,9-epoxy-4- isopropyl- 37 18.776 0.25 2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)- 38 19.16 0.31 2-Propanone, 1-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxy-3- methoxyphenyl)- 39 21.893 0.66 n-Hexadecanoic acid 40 22.818 0.17 Imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine, 1-benzyl-2-(2-pyridyl)- 41 22.842 0.47 2-(Methylthio)phenazine 42 22.948 0.31 [1,2,3]Triazolo[4,5-e][1,4]diazepine-5,8-dione, 1,4,6,7- tetrahydro- 43 23.47 0.56 12,13-Epoxy-11-hydroxyoctadec-9-enoic acid, methyl ester, trimethylsilyl ether 44 23.575 0.71 6-Thiopyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4,6(5H,7H)-dione-3- carboxamide 45 23.652 1.88 Ethylamine, N,N-diheptyl-2-(2-thiophenyl)- 46 23.663 0.55 3-Cyclopentylpropionic acid, 4-biphenyl ester 47 23.806 0.69 Bismuthine, triphenyl- 48 23.846 1.53 1,1'-Biphenyl, 4-butoxy- 49 24.089 2.30 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- 50 24.125 0.87 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-tetradecyl- 51 24.371 0.47 Linoleic acid ethyl ester 52 24.564 0.62 2,8-Disilatricyclo[7.3.0.0(3,7)]dodeca-4,6,10,12-tetraene, 2,2,8,8-tetramethyl- 53 25.205 0.19 Ethanol 54 25.367 0.26 1,1'-Biphenyl, 4-butoxy- 55 25.611 0.22 Tributyl acetylcitrate 56 25.919 0.23 Ethanol 57 26.057 0.23 Thiazolo[4,5-c]pyridin-2-amine, N-phenyl- 58 26.602 0.28 Ethanol 59 27.165 0.47 1-Hexadecanesulfonamide, N-(3-acetylphenyl)- 60 27.182 0.37 13-Docosenoic acid, (Z)-, TBDMS derivative 61 27.271 0.35 Ethanol 62 27.521 0.29 Ethylamine, N,N-diheptyl-2-phenylthio 63 27.812 0.24 2-Chloroaniline-5-sulfonic acid 64 27.921 0.38 Ethanol 65 28.309 0.25 Ethylamine, N,N-diheptyl-2-(2-thiophenyl)- 66 28.433 0.17 Fenoterol, N-trifluoroacetyl-O,O,O,O- tetrakis(trimethylsilyl)deriv. 67 28.549 0.41 Ethanol 68 28.939 0.19 Ethylamine, N,N-diheptyl-2-phenylthio 69 29.119 0.32 2-Chloroaniline-5-sulfonic acid PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6433 70 29.142 0.42 Ethanol 71 29.304 0.86 Vitamin E 72 29.539 0.19 L-Alanine, N-[N-[N-[(2-hydroxy-1- naphthalenyl)methylene]-L-valyl]-L-isoleucyl]-, ethyl ester 73 29.726 0.45 1-[2,4-Bis(trimethylsiloxy)phenyl]-2-[(4- trimethylsiloxy)phenyl]propan-1-one 74 29.741 0.42 Ethanol 75 30.301 0.48 Phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-[(4-hydroxy-3,5- dimethylphenyl)methyl]- 76 30.323 0.41 Ethanol 77 30.826 0.32 1-Heptene, 1,3-diphenyl-1-(trimethylsilyloxy)- 78 30.894 0.38 Ethanol 79 31.448 0.35 Ethanol 80 31.968 0.47 4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 6,7-dimethoxy-3-phenyl- 81 31.988 0.30 Ethanol 82 32.376 0.17 Carbonic acid, 4-[[(4- methoxyphenyl)methylene]amino]phenyl pentyl ester 83 32.492 1.01 4-Methyl-2,4-bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene, 2TMS derivative 84 32.514 0.27 Ethanol 85 32.863 0.37 4-Benzoyl-N-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-benzamide 86 32.905 0.20 Phthalic acid, 3,5-dimethylphenyl 4-formylphenyl ester 87 32.993 1.37 Cyclotetrasiloxane, octamethyl- 88 33.035 0.23 Ethanol 89 33.419 0.22 4-Acetylphenyl 5-acetyl-2-methoxyphenyl ether 90 33.506 0.42 4-Benzoyl-N-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-benzamide 91 33.572 1.04 5-Hydroxy-7-methoxy-2-methyl-3-phenyl-4-chromenone 92 33.598 0.22 Ethanol 93 33.686 0.22 4-Methyl-2,4-bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene, 2TMS derivative Table S2. GC-MS Analysis of Sample B2 No. Retention Time (min) Peak Area (%) Component 1 5.218 7.29 3-Furaldehyde 2 5.461 5.25 Maleic anhydride 3 6.879 0.33 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-methyl- 4 7.081 0.33 2,4-Dihydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furan-3-one 5 8.845 1.03 3-Furancarboxylic acid, methyl ester 6 9.156 0.34 Acetic acid, 1-(2-methyltetrazol-5-yl)ethenyl ester 7 9.188 0.38 2-Butenedioic acid (E)-, monomethyl ester 8 9.363 0.52 Levoglucosenone PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6434 9 9.931 1.95 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl- 10 11.05 0.25 Benzaldehyde, 4-methyl- 11 11.3 0.66 Malic Acid 12 11.537 17.34 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural 13 11.8 0.76 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural 14 11.917 4.29 Malic Acid 15 12.074 0.62 2-Propoxy-succinic acid, dimethyl ester 16 13.233 0.54 Ethyldiethanolamine, O,O'-diacetyl 17 13.444 0.33 .beta.-Naphthyl myristate 18 13.624 0.27 Propanoic acid, 3-chloro-, 4-formylphenyl ester 19 13.657 0.28 Benzoic acid, 4-formyl-, methyl ester 20 13.919 5.25 4-Ethylbiphenyl 21 14.058 23.46 1,2,3-Benzenetriol 22 14.274 1.25 Vanillin 23 14.353 0.84 3,5-Dimethyl-1-dimethylphenylsilyloxybenzene 24 16.802 0.74 .beta.-D-Glucopyranose, 1,6-anhydro- 25 16.84 0.26 3-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzoic acid 26 17.104 0.31 Butyrovanillone 27 18.04 0.38 Benzenepropanol, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- 28 18.23 0.41 n-Butyric acid 2-ethylhexyl ester 29 18.596 1.58 Spiro[4.5]decan-7-one, 1,8-dimethyl-8,9-epoxy-4- isopropyl- 30 18.772 0.28 2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)- 31 19.179 0.29 2-Propanone, 1-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxy-3- methoxyphenyl)- 32 21.163 0.34 Benzo[b]-1,8-naphthyridin-5(10H)-one, 10-methyl- 33 21.898 0.54 n-Hexadecanoic acid 34 22.757 0.53 2-(p-Phenoxyphenyl)indolizine 35 22.885 1.03 1H-Benzo[d,E]phthalazine, 6-methoxy-1,3-dimethyl- 36 23.264 1.45 1H-Benzo[d,E]phthalazine, 6-methoxy-1,3-dimethyl- 37 24.09 2.21 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- 38 24.127 0.81 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-tetradecyl- 39 27.247 0.38 1,3-Benzenediol, o-(4-methylbenzoyl)-o'-(2- methoxybenzoyl)- 40 27.261 0.79 13-Docosenoic acid, (Z)-, TBDMS derivative 41 27.486 0.26 Hydrazinecarboxamide 42 28.121 0.29 Hydrazinecarboxamide 43 28.748 0.30 Hydrazinecarboxamide 44 29.361 0.32 Hydrazinecarboxamide 45 29.928 0.39 4-Methyl-2,4-bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene, 2TMS derivative 46 29.959 0.31 Hydrazinecarboxamide PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6435 47 30.541 0.31 Hydrazinecarboxamide 48 30.916 1.16 6H-Dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one, 7,9-dihydroxy-3-methoxy- 1-methyl- 49 31.051 0.37 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylglycol, 4TMS derivative 50 31.1 0.26 Hydrazinecarboxamide 51 31.57 0.37 1,3,3-Trimethyl-1-(4'-methoxyphenyl)-6-methoxyindane 52 31.614 1.02 Cyclotrisiloxane, hexamethyl- 53 31.627 0.58 4-Methyl-2,4-bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene, 2TMS derivative 54 31.647 0.26 Hydrazinecarboxamide 55 32.107 0.41 1-Adamantylamine, N-tert-butyldimethylsilyl- 56 32.16 0.56 Hexestrol, O,O'-di(pentafluoropropionyl)- 57 32.663 0.38 Silane, methylvinyl(pent-2-yloxy)tetradecyloxy- 58 32.687 1.77 4-Methyl-2,4-bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene, 2TMS derivative 59 33.148 0.30 Methane, tribromofluoro- 60 33.186 1.15 tert-Butyldimethylsilyl 3-methyl-4-((2,2,3,3,3- pentafluoropropanoyl)oxy)benzoate 61 33.236 1.54 4-Methyl-2,4-bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene, 2TMS derivative 62 33.732 0.29 Methane, tribromofluoro- 63 33.788 0.75 1-Adamantylamine, N-tert-butyldimethylsilyl- 64 33.804 0.53 tert-Butyldimethylsilyl 3-methyl-4-((2,2,3,3,3- pentafluoropropanoyl)oxy)benzoate 65 33.954 0.24 1-Adamantylamine, N-tert-butyldimethylsilyl- Table S3. GC-MS Analysis of Sample B3 No. Retention Time (min) Peak Area (%) Component 1 5.203 6.88 Furfural 2 5.397 2.37 1H-Imidazole, 1,2-dimethyl- 3 5.908 0.25 Phenethylamine, p,.alpha.-dimethyl- 4 7.034 0.63 Phenethylamine, p,.alpha.-dimethyl- 5 8.159 0.26 (S)-(+)-1-Cyclohexylethylamine 6 8.709 0.33 Cyclohexanamine, N-3-butenyl-N-methyl- 7 8.819 1.05 1H-Imidazole-4-carboxylic acid, methyl ester 8 8.987 0.28 1H-Imidazole-4-carboxylic acid, methyl ester 9 9.175 0.70 (S)-(+)-1-Cyclohexylethylamine 10 9.35 2.00 Levoglucosenone 11 9.874 1.13 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl- 12 10.275 0.26 Meso-1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid 13 11.032 0.60 N-Chloroacetyl-3,6,9,12-tetraoxapentadec-14-yn-1- amine 14 11.329 18.00 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6436 15 12.164 3.92 Malic Acid 16 12.384 1.46 1,2-Cyclobutanedicarboxylic acid, trans- 17 12.552 0.70 1,2-Cyclobutanedicarboxylic acid, trans- 18 12.772 0.70 Melezitose 19 13.561 0.29 5-tert-Butylpyrogallol 20 13.917 10.13 1,2,3-Benzenetriol 21 14.208 3.31 Benzaldehyde, 3-hydroxy-4-methoxy- 22 14.324 1.97 2-(4'-Methoxymethylbiphenyl-4-yl)propan-2-ol 23 15.023 0.20 1-Cyclohexen-3-one, 2-acetyl-1-hydroxy-5,5-dimethyl- 24 15.12 0.32 2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,3-dimethoxy-5- methyl- 25 15.883 0.31 5-tert-Butylpyrogallol 26 16.122 0.27 1-Cyclohexen-3-one, 2-acetyl-1-hydroxy-5,5-dimethyl- 27 16.239 0.27 4-Aminobutyramide, N-methyl-N-[4-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-2- butynyl]-N',N'-bis(trifluoroacetyl)- 28 16.284 0.22 4-Aminobutyramide, N-methyl-N-[4-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-2- butynyl]-N',N'-bis(trifluoroacetyl)- 29 17.073 0.50 3-Isopropoxy-4-methoxybenzamide 30 17.972 0.91 N-2,4-Dnp-L-arginine 31 18.141 0.37 2,4,6-Trimethoxyamphetamine 32 18.587 5.34 2-Acetoxy-3,3-dimethyl-2-(3-oxo-but-1-enyl)- cyclobutanecarboxylic acid, methyl ester 33 19.117 0.56 (E)-4-Hexenoic acid, 2-acetyl-2-(1-buten-3-yl)-, ethyl ester 34 20.224 0.25 N-2,4-Dnp-L-arginine 35 20.359 0.25 1b,4a-Epoxy-2H- cyclopenta[3,4]cyclopropa[8,9]cycloundec[1,2-b]oxiren- 5(6H)-one, 7-(acetyloxy)decahydro-2,9,10-trihydroxy- 3,6,8,8,10a-pentamethyl- 36 21.873 2.30 N-2,4-Dnp-L-arginine 37 22.054 1.34 Di-sec-butyl phthalate 38 22.436 0.26 Androst-4-en-11-ol-3,17-dione, 9-thiocyanato- 39 23.244 0.22 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylthio-benzaldehyde 40 23.652 1.87 3,4-Dimethoxyphenol, TMS derivative 41 24.021 2.34 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- 42 24.085 9.58 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- 43 24.331 0.42 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylthio-benzaldehyde 44 24.364 0.60 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylthio-benzaldehyde 45 24.609 0.43 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylthio-benzaldehyde 46 25.082 0.20 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylthio-benzaldehyde 47 26.518 0.81 Androst-4-en-11-ol-3,17-dione, 9-thiocyanato- 48 26.873 0.24 1,2-Cinnolinedicarboxylic acid, 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a- octahydro-4-trimethylsilyloxy-, diethyl ester PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6437 49 27.275 0.18 Ethanol 50 27.514 0.37 1,2-Cinnolinedicarboxylic acid, 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a- octahydro-4-trimethylsilyloxy-, diethyl ester 51 28.141 0.55 1,2-Cinnolinedicarboxylic acid, 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a- octahydro-4-trimethylsilyloxy-, diethyl ester 52 28.413 0.19 Ethanol 53 28.769 0.87 Ethanol 54 29.247 1.55 Vitamin E 55 29.357 0.58 Ethanol 56 29.933 0.75 1,2-Cinnolinedicarboxylic acid, 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a- octahydro-4-trimethylsilyloxy-, diethyl ester 57 30.211 6.55 Heptasiloxane, 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11,13,13- tetradecamethyl- 58 31.052 0.50 Octasiloxane, 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11,13,13,15,15- hexadecamethyl- 59 31.13 0.31 Heptasiloxane, 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11,13,13- tetradecamethyl- Table S4. GC-MS Analysis of Sample B4 No. Retention Time (min) Peak Area (%) Component 1 5.242 6.16 Furfural 2 5.449 7.45 Maleic anhydride 3 6.924 0.33 Pyrazole-4-carboxaldehyde, 1-methyl- 4 8.224 0.36 Imidazole, 2-amino-5-[(2-carboxy)vinyl]- 5 8.761 0.42 Cyclohexanamine, N-3-butenyl-N-methyl- 6 8.858 1.26 1H-Imidazole-4-carboxylic acid, methyl ester 7 9.162 0.69 2,3-Dimethylfumaric acid 8 9.382 1.31 Levoglucosenone 9 9.919 1.44 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl- 10 11.058 0.34 Benzene, 1-ethynyl-4-fluoro- 11 11.142 0.55 3-Hydroxydecanoic acid 12 11.439 18.87 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural 13 11.62 1.66 Thiophene, 2-propyl- 14 12.08 0.38 Melezitose 15 12.422 1.07 3-Hydroxydecanoic acid 16 13.024 0.77 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-(thioacetyl)- 17 13.593 0.35 5-tert-Butylpyrogallol 18 13.989 26.16 1,2,3-Benzenetriol 19 14.253 2.98 1,2,3-Benzenetriol 20 14.35 3.49 1,2,3-Benzenetriol 21 14.596 0.33 Phenol, 2-[(1-methylpropyl)thio]- 22 15.159 0.29 2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,3-dimethoxy-5- methyl- PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6438 23 16.802 1.02 6-Thioguanosine 24 17.099 0.43 4-Mercaptobenzoic acid, S-methyl-, methyl ester 25 18.011 0.83 Acetamide, N-Methyl-N-[4-(3-hydroxypyrrolidinyl)-2- butynyl]- 26 18.173 0.87 2-Myristynoyl pantetheine 27 18.613 2.39 2-Acetoxy-3,3-dimethyl-2-(3-oxo-but-1-enyl)- cyclobutanecarboxylic acid, methyl ester 28 19.156 0.40 1-Propyl-3,6-diazahomoadamantan-9-ol 29 21.899 0.87 .alpha.-D-Glucopyranoside, methyl 2-(acetylamino)- 2-deoxy-3-O-(trimethylsilyl)-, cyclic methylboronate 30 22.08 0.30 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl octyl ester 31 22.514 0.42 Androst-4-en-11-ol-3,17-dione, 9-thiocyanato- 32 22.759 0.86 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylthio-benzaldehyde 33 23.568 4.97 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylthio-benzaldehyde 34 23.646 0.59 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylthio-benzaldehyde 35 24.092 3.06 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- 36 27.035 0.43 4H-Cyclopropa[5',6']benz[1',2':7,8]azuleno[5,6- b]oxiren-4-one, 8-(acetyloxy)- 1,1a,1b,1c,2a,3,3a,6a,6b,7,8,8a-dodecahydro- 3a,6b,8a-trihydroxy-2a-(hydroxymethyl)-1,1,5,7- tetramethyl-, (1a.alpha.,1b.beta.,1c.beta.,2a.beta.,3a.beta.,6a.alph a.,6b.alpha.,7.alpha.,8.beta.,8a.alpha.)- 37 29.377 0.48 4H-Cyclopropa[5',6']benz[1',2':7,8]azuleno[5,6- b]oxiren-4-one, 8-(acetyloxy)- 1,1a,1b,1c,2a,3,3a,6a,6b,7,8,8a-dodecahydro- 3a,6b,8a-trihydroxy-2a-(hydroxymethyl)-1,1,5,7- tetramethyl-, (1a.alpha.,1b.beta.,1c.beta.,2a.beta.,3a.beta.,6a.alph a.,6b.alpha.,7.alpha.,8.beta.,8a.alpha.)- 38 30.929 0.86 Acetic acid, 2,3-dihydro-7-methyl-2-oxo-6- (phenylmethyl)thiazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-5-yl ester 39 31.382 4.54 Octasiloxane, 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11,13,13,15,15- hexadecamethyl- Table S5. Py-GC-MS Analysis of CON No. Retention Time (min) Peak Area (%) Component 1 3.70 0.01 Actinobolin 2 4.10 2.82 4-methyl-2-Hexanamine 3 4.26 1.33 Glycidol 4 4.38 0.83 N,N-difluoro-Ethanamine 5 4.74 0.92 Furan 6 4.93 0.03 Ethanethiol 7 4.99 0.15 Methyl glyoxal 8 5.06 1.13 Formic acid PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6439 9 5.49 0.26 2,3-Butanedione 10 5.56 0.30 1-Propanol 11 5.70 0.84 3-methyl-Furan 12 5.85 0.21 Acetic acid 13 6.68 8.72 Acetic acid 14 6.87 0.12 3-methyl-3-Buten-2-one 15 6.95 0.61 1-hydroxy-2-Propanone 16 7.15 0.21 Methyl formate 17 7.25 0.12 N-(4-amino-3-furazanyl)-Acetamide 18 7.36 0.07 O-(3-methylbutyl)-Hydroxylamine 19 7.39 0.08 2-methylpropyl ester Formic acid 20 7.55 0.37 2,5-dimethyl-Furan 21 7.68 0.05 Formic acid, 2-methylpropyl ester 22 7.75 0.08 Ethyl formate 23 7.95 0.20 2-Vinylfuran 24 8.10 0.20 Propanoic acid 25 8.23 0.11 2-Propenoic acid 26 8.39 0.13 1H-Pyrrole, 1-methyl- 27 8.65 0.09 Ethanone, 1-(methylenecyclopropyl)- 28 8.80 0.27 2-propenyl ester 2-Propenoic acid 29 8.90 0.03 1,5-Pentanediol 30 8.99 0.03 Propanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-, hydrazide 31 9.13 0.19 Toluene 32 9.24 0.71 Acetic acid, methyl ester 33 9.41 0.07 Acetic acid, hydrazide 34 9.48 0.04 Propanoic acid, 2-methyl- 35 9.58 0.29 Propanal 36 9.83 0.62 Propanoic acid, 2-oxo-, methyl ester 37 10.03 0.22 Glycidol 38 10.13 0.50 3-Amino-s-triazole 39 10.30 0.06 Butanoic acid 40 10.43 0.13 Furfural 41 10.60 0.03 1,6:2,3-Dianhydro-4-O-acetyl-.beta.-d-allopyranose 42 10.64 0.04 2(5H)-Furanone, 3-methyl- 43 10.75 0.04 3-Cyclohepten-1-one 44 10.90 0.15 2-Amino-2-methyl-1,3-propanediol 45 11.16 2.78 Furfural 46 11.21 0.12 2-Cyclopenten-1-one 47 11.33 0.03 Pentane, 1-nitro- 48 11.39 0.04 Propanoic acid, 2-methyl- PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6440 49 11.50 0.03 Ethanol, 2-(2-propenyloxy)- 50 11.68 0.11 Maleic anhydride 51 11.83 0.16 Maleic anhydride 52 11.89 0.74 2-Furanmethanol 53 12.00 0.06 Ethylbenzene 54 12.07 0.07 Formaldehyde, methyl(2-propynyl)hydrazone 55 12.21 0.22 1,2-Ethanediol, diacetate 56 12.28 0.05 1,2-Cyclopentanedione 57 12.41 0.01 1-Methyl pyrrolidin-3-amine 58 12.56 0.02 4-Cyclopentene-1,3-dione 59 12.64 0.01 1,4-Cyclohexanediol, trans- 60 12.68 0.00 Acetic acid, 1,4-pentadien-3-yl ester 61 12.74 0.06 2-Pentene, (E)- 62 12.79 0.14 3-Butene-1,2-diol 63 12.96 0.05 Bicyclo[4.2.0]octa-1,3,5-triene 64 13.08 0.12 s-Triazole, 3-acetamido- 65 13.37 0.12 2H-Pyran-2-one, 5,6-dihydro- 66 13.40 0.09 Methacrylic anhydride 67 13.51 0.08 2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-methyl- 68 13.64 0.10 Ethanone, 1-(2-furanyl)- 69 13.88 0.40 2(5H)-Furanone 70 14.01 0.14 Methyl propionate 71 14.31 1.06 1,2-Cyclopentanedione 72 14.40 0.04 Butanoic acid, 4-hydroxy-2-methylene- 73 14.55 0.02 Dihydroxyacetone 74 14.62 0.04 2(5H)-Furanone, 5-methyl- 75 14.69 0.11 2,5-Furandione, dihydro-3-methylene- 76 14.87 0.04 Selenium(IV) oxide 77 14.95 0.01 6-Isopropoxytetrazolo[1,5-b]pyridazine 78 15.04 0.06 Benzene, propyl- 79 15.25 0.19 2,3-Pentanedione 80 15.39 0.74 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-methyl- 81 15.50 0.19 Pentanoic acid, 1-cyclopentylethyl ester 82 15.75 0.05 Ethyl acetoacetate 83 15.91 0.49 Phenol 84 16.14 0.03 3-Hexenoic acid, (E)- 85 16.28 0.02 2-Furanmethanol, acetate 86 16.41 0.05 Heptanoic acid 87 16.70 1.02 Oxazolidine, 2,2-diethyl-3-methyl- 88 16.80 1.07 2-Methyliminoperhydro-1,3-oxazine PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6441 89 16.88 0.06 3-Cyclobutene-1,2-dione, 3,4-dihydroxy- 90 17.07 0.03 1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde 91 17.17 0.04 1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde 92 17.29 0.08 4(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 6-hydroxy- 93 17.35 0.08 6-Azacytosine 94 17.51 0.02 Limonene 95 17.72 0.40 1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-methyl- 96 17.78 0.04 2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3,5,5-trimethyl- 97 17.86 0.06 2,5-Furandione, 3,4-dimethyl- 98 17.93 0.05 2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2,3-dimethyl- 99 18.04 0.18 Benzene, (methoxymethyl)- 100 18.19 0.14 4-Methyl-5H-furan-2-one 101 18.32 0.11 Phenol, 2-methyl- 102 18.39 0.13 Benzene, n-butyl- 103 18.54 0.12 2-Hexanone, 4-methyl- 104 18.60 0.15 Oxalic acid, diisohexyl ester 105 18.77 0.39 (S)-(+)-2',3'-Dideoxyribonolactone 106 18.95 0.41 p-Cresol 107 19.11 0.23 2,5-Furandicarboxaldehyde 108 19.24 0.15 Pyrazine, 2-methoxy-3-methyl- 109 19.50 2.21 Phenol, 2-methoxy- 110 19.59 0.06 Cyclopentanecarboxaldehyde, 2-methyl-3- methylene- 111 19.66 0.03 Cyclopentaneacetaldehyde, 2-formyl-3-methyl- .alpha.-methylene- 112 19.73 0.08 Piperazine, 2-methyl- 113 19.79 0.11 Tert.-butylaminoacrylonitryl 114 19.84 0.27 Pyrimidine-4,6-diol, 5-methyl- 115 19.99 0.09 Benzofuran, 2-methyl- 116 20.12 0.32 2,3-Pentadiene 117 20.27 0.24 Maltol 118 20.34 0.11 2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-2-hydroxy- 119 20.45 0.11 Isobutyl 2-methylpentyl carbonate 120 20.53 0.11 2H-Pyran-3(4H)-one, dihydro-6-methyl- 121 20.76 0.14 2(1H)-Pyridinone 122 20.85 0.12 3-Pyridinol 123 20.90 0.15 2,3-dimethyl-Phenol 124 21.16 0.47 pentyl-Benzene, 125 21.26 0.05 2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,5-dimethyl- 126 21.35 0.07 3-ethyl-Phenol 127 21.40 0.13 2,3-dimethyl-Phenol PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6442 128 21.47 0.12 2,3-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde 129 21.64 0.15 Hydrazine, 1-methyl-1-phenyl- 130 21.70 0.19 2-Methoxy-6-methylphenol 131 21.89 0.15 Methanesulfonamide, N,N-dimethyl- 132 22.08 1.95 Creosol 133 22.28 1.67 Catechol 134 22.52 0.34 2,3-dihydro-Benzofuran 135 22.73 0.44 6,8-Dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane, 7-ethyl-5-methyl-, (1R- exo)- 136 22.92 0.37 1-(1H-Imidazol-2-yl)-2,2-dimethyl-propan-1-one 137 23.15 2.07 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural 138 23.39 0.32 E-8-Methyl-7-dodecen-1-ol acetate 139 23.51 1.05 Oxalic acid, monoamide, n-propyl, nonyl ester 140 23.66 0.76 1,2-Benzenediol, 3-methoxy- 141 23.83 0.90 Phenol, 4-ethyl-2-methoxy- 142 23.87 0.13 Ethanone, 1-(2,5-dihydroxyphenyl)- 143 24.00 0.24 2-Hydroxy-5-imidazolic acid, ethyl ester 144 24.15 0.77 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-methyl- 145 24.35 1.03 Ethanone, 1-(5-ethyl-1,3-dioxan-5-yl)- 146 24.52 2.55 2-Methoxy-4-vinylphenol 147 24.60 0.43 1-Butoxypropan-2-yl 2-methylbutanoate 148 24.71 0.33 Thiophene, 2-formyl-2,3-dihydro- 149 24.79 0.16 2H-Imidazole-2-thione, 1,3-dihydro-1-methyl- 150 24.83 0.13 Heptyl S-2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl isopropylphosphonothiolate 151 24.89 0.46 2-Imidazolidinone, 1,3-dimethyl- 152 24.98 0.18 1H-1,2,4-Triazole-3-methanol, 5-amino- 153 25.14 1.87 Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy- 154 25.21 0.64 Phenol, 2-methoxy-3-(2-propenyl)- 155 25.36 0.64 Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-propyl- 156 25.46 0.10 Butanedioic acid, methyl- 157 25.54 0.24 Methyl 4,6-decadienyl ether 158 25.67 0.50 4-Ethylthiophenol 159 25.90 1.29 1,2,3-Benzenetriol 160 26.02 1.81 Vanillin 161 26.22 0.62 2H-Pyran-2-one, 4-hydroxy-6-(2-oxopropyl)- 162 26.37 0.19 Pyrazole-5-carboxylic acid, 3-methyl- 163 26.41 0.13 Pyrazole-5-carboxylic acid, 3-methyl- 164 26.45 0.29 1,2,3-Benzenetriol 165 26.64 1.55 3,5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxytoluene 166 26.70 1.52 trans-Isoeugenol PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6443 167 26.91 0.68 Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-propyl- 168 27.01 0.11 4(1H)-Isobenzofuranone, hexahydro-3a,7a-dimethyl-, cis-(.+/-.)- 169 27.07 0.21 4-Hydroxyimino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzofurazan 170 27.18 0.20 Pentadecane 171 27.22 0.18 Benzene, hexamethyl- 172 27.38 0.59 Apocynin 173 27.48 0.25 3-Amino-4-methoxybenzamide 174 27.59 0.08 Formamide, N-(3-methyl-5-isoxazolyl)- 175 27.66 0.24 3-Ethoxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde 176 27.77 0.18 Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-, methyl ester 177 27.85 0.59 Hydroquinone, TMS derivative 178 27.93 0.18 3,4-Altrosan 179 28.08 1.11 2-Propanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)- 180 28.23 0.86 .beta.-D-Glucopyranose, 1,6-anhydro- 181 28.55 3.27 (E)-Stilbene 182 28.63 0.91 .beta.-D-Glucopyranose, 1,6-anhydro- 183 28.81 1.95 D-Allose 184 28.94 1.54 .beta.-D-Glucopyranose, 1,6-anhydro- 185 29.01 1.14 D-Allose 186 29.09 0.50 D-Allose 187 29.17 1.67 .beta.-D-Glucopyranose, 1,6-anhydro- 188 29.28 0.24 4-Propyl-1,1'-diphenyl 189 29.43 0.63 2-Dodecenoic acid 190 29.70 0.17 Octadecanoic acid 191 29.82 0.18 Eicosanoic acid 192 29.85 0.20 Tricyclo[3.3.1.1(3,7)]decane-2,6-dione, 4-hydroxy- 193 30.02 0.16 dl-Serine, N-acetyl-, methyl ester, acetate (ester) 194 30.11 0.27 (E)-2,6-Dimethoxy-4-(prop-1-en-1-yl)phenol 195 30.24 0.74 Benzenepropanol, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- 196 30.36 0.29 3-Heptadecene, (Z)- 197 30.44 0.54 Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy- 198 30.61 0.10 1,5,9-Decatriene, 2,3,5,8-tetramethyl- 199 30.70 0.20 2-Naphthalenol, 3-methoxy- 200 30.75 0.16 Tetradecane, 4-methyl- 201 30.79 0.20 1-Oxa-4-thiaspiro[4.4]nonane 202 30.90 0.24 4-Methoxymethyl-6-methyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridin- 3-ylamine 203 31.06 0.22 4,7-Dimethoxyindan-1-one 204 31.21 1.12 (E)-2,6-Dimethoxy-4-(prop-1-en-1-yl)phenol 205 31.33 0.25 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Yue et al. (2022). “Cornus officinalis nutshell usage,” BioResources 17(4), 6411-6444. 6444 206 31.49 0.18 Phenazine, 5,10-dihydro-1,3-dinitro- 207 31.76 0.29 4(3H)-Pteridinone, 3-hydroxy-7-methyl- 208 32.09 0.51 Ethanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)- 209 32.19 0.21 Tetradecanoic acid 210 32.28 0.21 Phenol, 4-(ethoxymethyl)-2-methoxy- 211 32.43 0.15 4-Sec-butyl-5-methyl-2-phenyl-4,5-dihydrooxazole-4- carboxylic acid, methyl ester 212 32.74 0.35 7-Pentadecyne 213 33.02 0.65 2-Pentanone, 1-(2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl) 214 33.38 0.59 1,4-Benzenedimethanol, .alpha.,.alpha.'- bis(azidomethyl)- 215 33.76 0.16 Citronellol 216 34.24 0.11 (1S,15S)-Bicyclo[13.1.0]hexadecan-2-one 217 34.35 0.08 13-Oxabicyclo[9.3.1]pentadecane 218 34.54 0.24 2-Azafluorenone 219 34.62 0.13 Benzoic acid, 2-fluoro-4,5-dimethoxy- 220 34.75 0.13 Benzenemethanol, 3,4,5-trimethoxy- 221 34.94 0.14 8-Phenyloctanoic acid 222 35.44 0.35 Octadecanoic acid 223 35.59 0.30 Octadecanoic acid 224 35.76 0.18 2H-1,3-Oxazine, 2-[(2,6- dimethylphenyl)imino]tetrahydro- 225 36.37 0.12 Neric acid 226 36.45 0.04 Oleic Acid 227 36.98 0.45 5-(3-Hydroxypropyl)-2,3-dimethoxyphenol 228 37.58 0.04 Methyl 18-fluoro-octadecanoate 229 37.79 0.03 (E)-15,16-Dinorlabda-8(17),12-dien-14-al 230 37.88 0.02 (E)-15,16-Dinorlabda-8(17),12-dien-14-al 231 37.99 0.03 3a,9-Dimethyldodecahydrocyclohepta[d]inden-3-one 232 38.21 0.03 9-Hexadecenoic acid 233 38.36 0.05 6-Amino-2,4-dimethyl-8-methoxyquinoline 234 38.47 0.04 Oleic Acid 235 38.95 0.04 Palmitoleic acid 236 39.39 1.31 n-Hexadecanoic acid 237 39.67 0.04 Diazene, 1-(4-methylphenyl)-2-(trimethylsilyl)- 238 39.71 0.01 Octadecanoic acid 239 39.75 0.05 Tridecanoic acid 240 40.17 0.03 Pyrene, hexadecahydro- 241 40.71 0.02 1-Eicosene