PEER-REVIEW ARTICLE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6621 Prediction of Raw-Wood Consumption Based on Potential Wood Usage in Public Buildings: A Quantitative Approach Using Building Construction Statistics Min-Ji Kim, Sangjin Chun, and Yeonjung Han * The use of wood in the construction sector to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is garnering global interest. In South Korea, the wood usage in public buildings is limited, being influenced by factors such as the high price of wood products and their limited use in large structures. In this work the future wood consumption in South Korea is predicted based on its potential use in current public buildings. The structural wood products required for the buildings were quantified based on the available statistical data. Items investigated were the (1) number of buildings started, (2) ratio of public buildings, (3) ratio of wooden structures, (4) average floor area of wooden buildings, (5) material cost per floor, and (6) wood prices. Assuming that the buildings contain reinforced-concrete and wooden structures, the wood consumption was estimated based on the replacement ratio. The results indicated that the prices of wood products were relatively higher than those of raw timber. The number of buildings is expected to decrease in line with the expected population decline, resulting in the decrease of wood amount required for public buildings. To achieve long-term GHG-reduction goals, it is important to replace the existing public buildings in Korea with wooden structures. DOI: 10.15376/biores.19.3.6621-6637 Keywords: Wood consumption; Construction sector; Statistical data; Greenhouse-gas emissions reduction; Predictive approach; Public buildings; South Korea Contact information: Forest Products and Industry Department, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455, Republic of Korea; *Corresponding author: yeonjungh@korea.kr INTRODUCTION The 2015 Paris Agreement (United Nations 2015) highlighted the need to focus on carbon cycling and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction. The construction sector, known for its significant energy consumption (European Commission 2014), is showing a growing interest in the use of wood as a material to reduce GHG emissions (Gosselin et al. 2017). Owing to its high strength, cyclical use of resources, and low carbon emissions during production, wood presents favorable environment-friendly characteristics compared to modern construction materials (Milaj et al. 2017; Pierobon et al. 2019; Ruschi Mendes Saade et al. 2020). The awareness that it is important for architects to consider not only the requirements of building owners and occupants but also the environmental impact of construction-material selection is increasing (Buchanan and Honey 1994). An increasing number of studies in the literature on the topic suggest that using wood in the construction sector can be an effective way to address the on-going climate crisis, urging decision- makers to prefer wood over modern materials. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6622 Furthermore, the increase in wood usage in the construction sector can be attributed to the environmental and technological improvements in wood products, national initiatives that encourage wood usage, and the fact that wood can complement/be used for diverse architectural structures. In North America, the continuous promotion of wood in the construction sector has been linked to a consistent supply of wood products in the market (Cordier et al. 2020). In 2020, South Korea utilized 27,300,000 m3 of wood and wood products. Among them, raw logs accounted for 6,340,000 m3 (23.2%), while branches and other raw materials, excluding raw logs, accounted for 543,000 m3 (2.0%). Notably, imported wood products constitute a significant portion of wood usage, accounting for 20,400,000 m3 (74.8%) of the total consumption. In terms of raw log sourcing, domestically produced raw logs amount to 3,740,000 m3, whereas the volume of imported raw logs is 2,600,000 m3. The data highlight a notable reliance on imported wood over domestically sourced wood, with the utilization rate of domestically sourced wood at 15.7%. In addition, whereas the volumes of sawn timber available for use as construction material produced from imported raw logs and used as sawn timber products are 2,350,000 m3 and 2,390,000 m3, respectively, domestically sourced sawn timber amounts to 544,000 m3, which is comparatively lower. Furthermore, excluding sawn timber (543,000 m3), fiberboard (1,270,000 m3), and preservative-treated lumber (10,700 m3), the majority of domestically produced timber is primarily utilized as fuelwood (Korea Forest Service 2021a). In 2020, the forest area of the South Korea was 6,290,000 ha, constituting 62.6% of the total land area. The growing stock volume per hectare has exhibited a significant increase from 5.7 m3/ha in 1953 to 165.2 m3/ha in 2020. However, despite a steady increase in growing stock volume, there is a notable trend of forest aging, which is particularly evident since 2009, with a sharp rise in the volume of IV–V age classes growing stock, alongside a gradual decline in II–III age classes growing stock (Han and Lee 2021). Consequently, there are concerns over the downward trends in the greenhouse gas absorption rate of the forested areas in South Korea, which declined from 12.4% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2010, and further to 6.4% in 2017. Considering the carbon storage and substitution effects of wood and wood products, utilizing domestically produced wood and wood products for buildings that are expected to have longer lifespans (such as public buildings) can have long-term benefits (Amiri et al. 2020). In South Korea, policies are being developed to encourage the use of domestic wood and wood products in public buildings, while recognizing the potential market changes and product management system transformations initiated by the government. This study predicts the volume of future domestic sawn timber usage in South Korea based on the potential wood usage in public buildings. To predict the volume of domestic sawn timber usage, a model based on Cordier et al. (2020) was employed to quantify the consumption of wood products based on the building permits in the country; the model was adjusted to fit the available statistical data for South Korea. There was a collation of data on the (1) total number of buildings started, (2) ratio of public buildings in total buildings, (3) ratio of wooden structures in public buildings, (4) average floor area of wooden buildings, (5) material costs per floor area, and (6) wood price. In addition, assuming the replacement of steel-concrete structures in public buildings with wooden structures, the volume of sawn timber usage was predicted based on the replacement ratio. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6623 EXPERIMENTAL Methods The literature on quantifying the consumption of materials used in the construction sector is limited to residential buildings because of the scarcity of available data for public and commercial buildings (Augiseau and Barles 2017; Cordier et al. 2020). To quantify the wood consumption in commercial buildings, while using limited data, Geskin Conseil (2008) considered the price of wood and the permit ratio for wooden structures. This methodology was used to quantify the structural wood products required for newly constructed commercial buildings (Cordier et al. 2020). In the present study, the volume of wood to construct public buildings in South Korea was estimated by employing four variables, namely, BP [building permits of new (NR) buildings], SCs (structural cost share), WBs (wood building share), and WSp (wood structure price), as shown in Eq. 1, BP SCs WBs Estimated volume of structural wood = WSp   (1) where BP is construction cost for newly permitted building (USD), and WSp is unit cost of structural wood per volume (USD/m3). The method for quantifying the wood-product usage in commercial buildings presented in Eq. 1 was modified to estimate the volume of wood used in public buildings in educational and social sectors, as shown in Eq. 2, ( ) ( )a b c d e R f     = (2) where a is the total number of building starts, b is the share of public buildings in the education and society sector in total buildings (%), c is the share of wood structures in public buildings (%), d is the average floor area of the wooden buildings (m2), e is the material cost per floor-area [South Korean Won (KRW)/m2], f is the unit cost of wood materials per volume (KRW/m3), and R is the raw-wood consumption (m3). Assuming that the steel-concrete structures in public buildings would be replaced by wooden structures, the volume of sawn timber usage was predicted based on the replacement ratio (x), as shown in Eq. 3. { (1 ) } ( )a b c x d e R f   −    = (3) where x is the replacement ratio of wooden structures in public buildings of education and society sector (%). Statistics of Building Start The Statistical Yearbook of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT 2022), provided by the South Korean Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, presents the building start status in South Korea for 2010–2021 (see Table 1). Since 2010, the number of buildings under construction in South Korea has been increasing steadily, peaking at 255,941 units in 2015 before declining gradually. Similarly, the number of wooden buildings exhibits a trend comparable to the overall building count, peaking at 14,945 units in 2016 and decreasing subsequently to 10,897 units, as of 2021. However, the proportion of wooden buildings out of the total buildings has remained relatively stable, ranging from a minimum of 5.05% to a maximum of 6.67%. The annual average proportion stands at 5.66%. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6624 Table 1. Status of Building Start and the Proportion of Wooden Structures by Year (for 2010–2021) Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total number of building starts 188,470 198,863 190,589 187,545 199,390 255,941 Number of wooden-building starts 9,585 10,037 10,369 10,339 11,493 13,595 Proportion of wooden buildings (%) 5.09 5.05 5.44 5.51 5.76 6.02 Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total number of building starts 231,972 208,935 216,102 194,947 185,640 185,841 Number of wooden-building starts 14,945 13,938 11,828 10,011 10,102 10,897 Proportion of wooden structures (%) 6.44 6.67 5.47 5.14 5.44 5.84 Table 2 presents the start status of buildings in the education and social sectors (classified as public buildings) for 2010–2020. The buildings in the education and social sectors in South Korea include school dormitories and cultural, assembly, religious, medical, educational, research, infant and toddler, training, sports, broadcasting and communication, and power facilities. The number of buildings in the education and social sectors has been decreasing steadily since 2010, with a decrease of 33.4% in 2020, compared with the number of buildings in 2010. The average floor area of the buildings in the education and social sectors was 1,095 m2, whereas that of wooden buildings was 66.6 m2. The annual average number of building-starts in the education and social sectors was 6836, with wooden buildings accounting for a relatively small proportion of 6.84%. Table 2. Building Start Status and the Proportion of Wooden Structure in the Education and Social Sectors by Year Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total number of building starts in the education and social sectors 8,853 7,455 7,938 7,268 6,551 7,223 Total number of wooden-building starts in the education and social sectors 760 419 576 468 350 431 Proportion of wooden buildings (%) 8.58 5.62 7.26 6.44 5.34 5.97 Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total number of building starts in the education and social sectors 6,489 5,554 6,085 5,885 5,892 Total number of wooden-building starts in the education and social sectors 421 348 550 339 204 Proportion of wooden structures (%) 6.49 6.27 9.04 5.76 3.46 Predicting the Number of Building Starts Based on the Population Model To predict the building-start status in South Korea up to 2050, a correlation analysis was carried out between the population and the number of buildings whose construction began in 2001–2020. Figure 1 illustrates the linear regression model used in the present study, expressing the correlation between population (x) and number of building starts (y). The linear regression model can be expressed as follows: 0.0198 807,844y x= − (3) where x is the population of South Korea, and y is the number of building starts. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6625 Fig. 1. Graph portraying the correlation between number of building starts in South Korea and population of the country; coefficient of determination (R2) Table 3. Population Estimates for 2021–2050 According to the Three Groups (Middle, High, and Low), based on the Population Projection Model Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Average (in thousand) 51,745 51,628 51,558 51,500 51,448 51,397 51,348 51,300 51,251 51,199 Maximum (in thousand) 51,746 51,681 51,724 51,805 51,908 52,012 52,119 52,226 52,332 52,436 Minimum (in thousand) 51,743 51,582 51,421 51,268 51,102 50,921 50,735 50,545 50,349 50,147 Year 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 Average (in thousand) 51,143 51,083 51,019 50,948 50,869 50,775 50,660 50,525 50,369 50,193 Maximum (in thousand) 52,535 52,629 52,716 52,794 52,864 52,920 52,954 52,967 52,958 52,928 Minimal (in thousand) 49,937 49,720 49,496 49,267 49,027 48,772 48,495 48,198 47,884 47,553 Year 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 Average (in thousand) 49,998 49,784 49,551 49,300 49,030 48,739 48,427 48,093 47,737 47,359 Maximal (in thousand) 52,880 52,812 52,723 52,614 52,485 52,334 52,160 51,963 51,742 51,497 Minimal (in thousand) 47,204 46,839 46,457 46,062 45,650 45,221 44,774 44,310 43,831 43,333 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6626 To predict the building-start status until 2050 based on future population projections, the population estimates were placed into three groups: average (middle), maximum (high), and minimum (low) population, as shown in Table 3 (Statistics Korea 2022). The population projection model considers factors such as the birth rate and life expectancy in South Korea and the rate of international migration outside the country. The linear regression models described in Eq. 3 were employed to predict the changes in the number of buildings based on the future population estimates until 2050 (Fig. 2). The estimations for the middle and low ranges, based on the population prediction model, portrayed a decreasing trend in the number of buildings starting in 2021, as the population is declining. By contrast, the high range estimated from the population prediction model indicated that the number of buildings would begin reaching its peak in 2039, with a gradual increase in population; this would be followed by a decreasing trend. Fig. 2. Prediction of total building-starts based on the future population projections for South Korea Estimating the Amount of Wood Products and Cost of Material Required for Building Wooden Structures To estimate the material costs of wood products used in the construction of wooden structures, two public buildings were considered (National Institute of Forest Science 2019, 2020). Both the buildings were designed using hybrid wood and reinforced-concrete structures. The first building considered in this work was a public building in Suwon, a four-story building, with the construction and total areas being 1,395.55 and 4,552.55 m2, respectively; the building structure consisted of engineered wood products. In total, 498.86 m3 of wood products (including interior and exterior materials) were used in the building. Based on the completion statement, the material costs of wood products for carpentry, wood-structure construction, and interior work were 148,300,000 KRW, 811,900,000 KRW, and 60,500,000 KRW, respectively, accounting for 14.8% of the total construction cost. The material cost of wood products was 224,000 KRW/m2, and the cost of wood products per cubic meter was 2,046,000 KRW/m3. The second was a public building in Yeongju, with a construction area of 425.00 m2 and a total floor area of 1,233 m2. The PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6627 building was a five-story building constructed using cross-laminated timber (CLT). A total of 190.96 m3 of wood products (including interior and exterior materials) were used in the building. The material cost of wood products for carpentry and wood-structure construction was 239,100,000 KRW, accounting for 8.9% of the total construction cost. The material cost of wood products per square meter of floor area was 193,900 KRW/m2, and the cost per cubic meter was 1,252,000 KRW/m3. Table 4 presents the quantities of wood products used in the two public buildings. The building in Suwon had a higher usage of wood for interior work, whereas the building in Yeongju utilized CLT extensively and did not require separate interior work; thus, there were differences in the material costs per square meter of floor area for both the buildings. Table 4. Amount of Wood Products used in the Public Buildings in Suwon (General Research Building of Forest Bioresources Department) and Yeongju (HAN-Green wooden building) Suwon (General Research Building of Forest Bioresources Department) Yeongju (HAN-Green wooden building) Country of origin Purpose of use Usage (m3) Country of origin Purpose of use Usage (m3) Domestically grown wood Structural member 210.35 Domestically grown wood Structural member 109.30 Interior material 36.33 Interior material - Exterior building material - Exterior building material - Imported wood Structural member 105.55 Imported wood Structural member 73.43 Interior material 127.76 Interior material 5.30 Exterior building material 18.87 Exterior building material 2.93 Total 498.86 Total 190.96 Market Price Trends and Predictions for Domestic Solid Wood Table 5 presents the annual trends in the market prices for the major domestic wood species grown in South Korea, while focusing on the fourth quarter of 2021 (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute 2022). In South Korea, wood is categorized into grades, e.g., 1st, 2nd, and 3rd grades. Table 5 presents the annual average prices of 1st-grade wood. Generally, structural lumber is produced from wood of grade higher than 1st grade. The wood market prices in South Korea have increased since 2020; this could be attributed to global logistics issues arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. The annual price change rates for the different wood species, as shown in Table 5, were −6.21% for Korean red pine, 0.94% for Japanese larch, and 0.33% for Korean pine. Notably, the exchange rate considered for our study was 1 USD = 1331 KRW, even though the exchange rate varied every year. Table 6 illustrates the import-price trends for coniferous and deciduous timber (Korea Environmental Corporation, 2022). The price trends for imported timber in South Korea portrayed a similar pattern to that of the domestic timber prices presented in Table 5, indicating a significant increase from 2020 to 2021. The import prices of coniferous and broadleaf tree wood in South Korea increased by 4.15 and 3.19%, respectively, portraying PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6628 a cumulative average increase of 3.67% between 2002 and 2021. As shown in Table 5, the market prices for coniferous timber are presented as price per cubic meter (m3), whereas for oak timber, the prices are presented as price per ton. However, in Table 6, the market prices for both coniferous and broadleaf timber are shown in terms of price per ton, resulting in differences in the measurement units between the two tables. Table 5. Solid-Wood Market Price Trends for the Major Tree Species in South Korea Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Korean red pine wood (KRW/m3; USD/m3) 260,000; 195 236,600; 178 229,200; 172 229,100; 172 229,100; 172 224,300; 169 201,400; 151 214,700; 161 Japanese larch wood (KRW/m3; USD/m3) 150,600; 113 145,600; 109 144,800; 109 148,000; 111 151,900; 114 152,200; 114 149,900; 113 164,100; 123 Korean pine wood (KRW/m3; USD/m3) 145,400; 109 141,400; 106 139,400; 105 141,200; 106 144,600; 109 144,600; 109 143,400; 108 147,400; 111 Oak wood (KRW/ton; USD/ton) 145,900; 110 132,000; 99 125,100; 94 124,700; 94 124,700; 94 124,700; 94 125,000; 94 125,000; 94 Table 6. Import Prices of Raw-Wood Material for Coniferous and Broadleaf Tree Wood Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Coniferous tree wood (USD/ton) 445 482.9 578.3 540.8 627.6 764.8 769.8 519.2 788.8 853.3 Broadleaf tree wood (USD/ton) 435 462.5 490.8 539.2 583.3 649.6 743.3 534.2 742 675.3 Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Coniferous tree wood (USD/ton) 710.7 716.6 753.2 788.4 612.5 642.8 842.8 695.3 590.3 800.6 Broadleaf tree wood (USD/ton) 593.6 622.1 585.4 613.5 517.7 589.7 767.6 615.8 458.8 617.8 The annual growth rates of market prices for domestically sourced major timber species were calculated by considering the market prices of domestic timber and the trends in raw-material imports. A growth rate of 0.94% was noted for Japanese larch, the most commonly used species for structural purposes in South Korea; this rate was used as the average. The growth rate of 3.67% (for raw-material import) was considered the maximum, and the growth rate of Korean pine (0.33%) was considered the minimum. By applying the average, greatest, and least increase rates, we predicted the market price changes for Korean red pine, Japanese larch, and Korean pine by 2050 (Fig. 3). PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6629 Fig. 3. Prediction of future raw-wood prices for Korean red pine, Japanese larch, and Korean pine, based on the annual increase in the prices during the previous years RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Estimation of Raw-Wood Consumption Based on Methodology Using Building Starts To calculate the raw-wood consumption for public buildings in the education and social sectors in 2020, the following values were substituted into Eq. (2): a = 185,640, b = 5,892/185,640 (= 0.032), c = 204/5,892 (= 0.035), d = 74 m2, e = 209,050 KRW/m2, f1 = 214,175 KRW/m3 (Korean red pine), f2 = 164,100 KRW/m3 (Japanese larch), and f3 = 147,355 KRW/m3 (Korean pine). Applying these prices to Korean red pine, Japanese larch, and Korean pine, the estimated wood consumption (R) was 14,707, 19,195, and 21,373 m3, respectively. Applying the methodology to the public building in Suwon [a = 1, b = 1, c = 1, d = 4,553 m2, e = 224,224 KRW/m2, f1 = 214,175 KRW/m3 (Korean red pine), f2 = 164,100 KRW/m3 (Japanese larch), f3 = 147,355 KRW/m3 (Korean pine)], the wood consumption was calculated to be 4,766, 6,221, and 6,926 m3 for Korean red pine, Japanese larch, and Korean pine, respectively. The estimation for the processing yield from round wood to lumber products was 48.7% and that from lumber to CLT was 26.7% (Han et al. 2016). Based on these findings, it was assumed that the processing yield of the final wood products used in the construction was 20%. Assuming this value, the required amounts were estimated to be 953, 1,244, and 1,385 m3 for Korean red pine, Japanese larch, and Korean pine, respectively. These values were significantly higher than the actual amount of wood products used in the public building in Suwon (499 m3). This discrepancy may be attributed to the hybrid structure of the building (with wooden and reinforced-concrete elements), resulting in a relatively low material cost per floor area (e). PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6630 Applying the same method to the public building in Yeongju [a = 1, b = 1, c = 1, d = 1,233 m2, e = 193,876 KRW/m2, f1 = 214,175 KRW/m3 (Korean red pine), f2 = 164,100 KRW/m3 (Japanese larch), f3 = 147,355 KRW/m3 (Korean pine)], the wood consumption was calculated to be 1,116, 1,457, and 1,622 m3 for Korean red pine, Japanese larch, and Korean pine, respectively. Applying a processing yield of 20%, the final wood product consumptions were estimated to be 223, 291, and 324 m3 for Korean red pine, Japanese larch, and Korean pine, respectively. When the price of Korean red pine wood was applied, the calculated final wood product requirement of 223 m3 was compared with the actual application of wood products in the public building, which was 191 m3. The margin of error was approximately 16.8%. Even though the public building in Yeongju (similar to that in Suwon) consisted of a hybrid structure (with wood and reinforced concrete), excluding the elevator section, it was mostly constructed with a CLT structure. This led to more accurate estimations in the material cost per floor area (National Institute of Forest Science 2019), compared to the estimations conducted for the building in Suwon. Furthermore, the public building in Yeongju utilized CLT (instead of engineered wood products) as the structural material, resulting in a reduced margin of error, compared to the building in Suwon. Through the analysis of the two cases, it was concluded that in South Korea, the prices of wood products produced through processing are relatively higher than those of raw timber. Additionally, because there are few instances of wood application in large public buildings in the country, further studies are required to evaluate the applicability of the proposed methodology. Prediction of Future Raw-Wood Consumption for Replacing Modern Construction Materials in Public Buildings with Wood With respect to the public buildings in the education and social sectors from 2010 to 2020, the average floor area for wooden buildings (66.6 m2) was significantly lower than the overall average (1,095 m2). This indicated a lower utilization of wooden structures in large buildings. By applying the substitution ratio (x) to Eq. 3, it was possible to estimate the amount of wood required to replace the modern materials in public buildings with wooden structures. The following values were substituted into Eq. 3: a = 185,640, b = 5,892/185,841 (= 0.032), c = 1 − 204/5,892 (= 0.965), d = 1,222 m2, e = 209,050 KRW/m2, f1 = 214,175 KRW/m3 (Korean red pine); the wood consumptions for various substitution ratios (x) of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.10 were calculated as 67,800, 338,800, and 677,600 m3, respectively. Prediction of Future Raw-Wood Consumption for Public Buildings Using the Current Wooden Building Ratio Using the building statistics data for 2010–2020, the annual averages were calculated to predict the changes in the raw-wood consumption for public buildings for 2021–2050. By using the variables in Eq. (2), values were estimated for a (building starts; based on the middle range population model), b (annual ratio of public buildings in the education and social sectors; 3.35%), c (annual ratio of wooden structure; 6.38%), d (average floor area; 66.6 m2), e (material cost per floor area; based on the medium price increase of 0.94%), and f (wood price; based on the medium price increase of 0.94%). PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6631 Table 7. Estimation of Future Raw-Wood Consumption for Public Buildings using Current Wooden Building Ratio Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Wood Consumption (m3) 31,457 31,121 30,920 30,753 30,602 30,458 30,317 30,178 30,037 29,888 Year 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 Wood Consumption (m3) 29,726 29,554 29,369 29,166 28,938 28,668 28,339 27,950 27,501 26,997 Year 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 Wood Consumption (m3) 26,437 25,821 25,152 24,430 23,653 22,817 21,920 20,961 19,938 18,850 As shown in Table 7, from 2021 (31,457 m3) to 2050 (18,850 m3), the wood consumption is predicted to decrease by 40.0% due to the continuous decline in the building numbers (corresponding to the expected decrease in population). This trend was even more evident when a lower-population model was used to predict the start of a building. Figure 4 depicts the changes in future raw-wood consumption for public buildings based on the variations in the building starts. Fig. 4. Changes in the future raw-wood consumption for public buildings based on the changes in building starts and lumber prices, while applying the (a) high, middle, and low population models and considering the changes in Korean red pine wood prices and (f) greatest, medium, and least price-escalation rates Prediction of Future Raw-Wood Consumption for Replacing Materials in Public Buildings with Wood From 2010 to 2020, the average floor area of public buildings in the education and social sectors was 1,095 m2, whereas that of wooden structures was only 66.6 m2. Based PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6632 on the statistics for the two large public buildings in Suwon and Yeongju, an estimate was made of the future wood consumption for replacing a building with an area of 1,095 m2. The variables in Eq. (3) were calculated using the average values from the statistical data of 2010–2020; the results were consistent with the future wood consumption estimated using the current proportion of wooden structures (shown in Table 7): a = middle population model, b = 0.0335, c = 0.0638, d = 1,095 m2, e = applying the medium price escalation rate based on 209,050 KRW/m2, f = applying the medium price escalation rate based on 214,175 KRW/m3 (Korean red pine). Assuming that 1% of the public buildings in the education and social sectors, with a floor area of 1,095 m2, are to be replaced with wooden structures, the substitution ratio (x) was set as 0.01. Table 8 presents the future wood consumption estimated using Eq. (3). Table 8. Changes in Future Raw-Wood Consumption for Replacing Non-Wooden Buildings with Wooden Buildings Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 x = 0.01 (m3) 75,893 75,083 74,597 74,195 73,831 73,483 73,143 72,809 72,467 72,108 Year 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 x = 0.01 (m3) 71,718 71,303 70,857 70,366 69,817 69,166 68,371 67,432 66,350 65,134 Year 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 x = 0.01 (m3) 63,783 62,297 60,682 58,941 57,067 55,049 52,885 50,571 48,103 45,477 Fig. 5. Changes in the future raw-wood consumption for replacing non-wooden building materials with wooden building products, based on the changes in the building starts and lumber prices, while (a) applying high, middle, and low population models and considering the changes in Korean red pine wood prices and (f) applying greatest, medium, and least price-escalation rates PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6633 The wood-consumption estimation for 2050, resulting from 1-% substitution with wooden structures (Table 8), indicated a 40-% decrease compared with the wood consumption in 2021. This outcome aligns with the results shown in Table 7, highlighting the continuous decline in the population of South Korea, leading to an overall decrease in construction initiatives for all buildings. Figure 5 illustrates the estimated changes in the future wood consumption resulting from a 1-% substitution of modern building materials with wooden structures, while considering the variations in the building starts. Analyzing the Contribution of Harvested Wood Products (HWPs) to the Net Uptake of Carbon Dioxide in South Korea’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) through Wood-Substitution in Public Buildings South Korea’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) have set targets for the net carbon uptake by harvested wood products (HWPs) by 2030 and 2050 (150,000 and 220,000 tCO2-eq, respectively) (Korea Forest Service, 2021b). Various suggestions have been proposed for achieving this goal. Based on the 2021 HWP carbon uptake of 669,115 tCO2-eq, meeting the targets requires an annual increase of 250,000 m3 in the raw-wood production from 2021 to 2030 and a subsequent annual increase of 150,000 m3 from 2031 to 2050, resulting in a total wood production of approximately 9,000,000 m3. Additionally, to maintain a 30-% input ratio of lumber into construction structural components that have a relatively long half-life, it is important to achieve a lumber production and carbon uptake of 1,818,300 m3 and 2,039,144 tCO2-eq by 2030 and 2,718,300 m3 and 2,164,842 tCO2 eq. by 2050, respectively (National Institute of Forest Science, 2024). Assuming a processing yield of 48.7% from log to lumber (Han et al. 2016), the calculated raw wood production for 2030 and 2050 was estimated to be 3,733,676 and 5,581,725 m3, respectively. As shown in Table 7, by maintaining the current ratio of wooden structures in the public buildings of the educational and social sectors, the minimal contribution to the HWP carbon-uptake target for 2030 and 2050 would be 0.80% and 0.34%, respectively; however, if 10% of large public buildings (by floor area) are replaced by wooden structures, the contribution will increase significantly to 19.3% and 8.15%, respectively. The current situation calls for novel strategies that can promote larger-scale wooden public buildings and replace the existing reinforced-concrete structures with wooden alternatives. Sensitivity Analysis To predict the wood usage in public buildings, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to compensate for the lack of important data (e.g., the material cost per floor area). In scenarios where actual averages are used, the results can be underestimated or overestimated, depending on the ranges covered by the factors (Cordier 2020). A sensitivity analysis was performed for predicting the wood-consumption in the future, based on the wood ratio of the two public buildings in 2020, as presented in Eq. (2). The predictions of wood consumption for the public buildings based on the future changes in building starts, wood prices, and substitution ratios are outlined in Eq. 3. In Eq. 2, if any numerator value changes by ±x%, the result changes by ±x%. In contrast, if the denominator value changes by ±x%, the result changes according to the respective percentages of change. The impacts of these factors on the predicted results are depicted in Table 9, calculated using the methodology proposed by Cordier (2020). PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6634 Table 9. Effects of Changes in Parameters on the Results (Cordier 2020) If one numerator is changed by + x% then, the result changes by + x% − x% − x% one denominator + x% − y% (|y|<|x|) − x% + z% (|x|<|z|) The results of the sensitivity analysis for wood consumption, predicted by applying the wood structural ratio of public buildings (as of 2020) shown in Eq. (2), are listed in Table 10. As only the wood price factor (f) is present in the denominator (and assuming that all factors are independent of each other), f can be considered the most influential factor for the increase and decrease in the results. In Table 10, the cases that yield the maximum and minimum predicted values are highlighted in blue and red, respectively. Except for the predicted a values, calculated using the unique population model, the same factors were used for the numerator. The sensitivity-analysis results for a and f are presented in Fig. 6. Table 10. Results of Sensitivity Analysis of Raw-Wood Consumption Calculated by Applying the Wood Structural Ratios of the two Public Buildings as of 2020 Numerator a, b, c, d, e is changed by −4.84~−0.07%** ± 0% ± 0.94% then, the result changes by −4.84~−0.07% ± 0% ± 0.94% Denominator f* + 0.33% −0.33% + 0.94% −0.60% + 3.67 −2.63% * Wood-price reduction model and species-specific price differences were not applied ** Annual average of statistics of building start Fig. 6. Maximum and minimum predicted values of raw-wood consumption for the public buildings in 2050, using the current wooden building ratio PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6635 The results obtained by applying Eq. 2, to predict the maximum and minimum wood consumption of public buildings by 2050, are presented in Fig. 6. In the predictions, the middle-range model (a = −1.74%, f = +0.94%) portrayed an increase of 150.2%, compared to the result of 18,042 m3. The high-range model (a = −0.07%, f = +0.33%) portrayed an increase of 78.1%, while the low-range model (a = −4.84%, f = +3.67%) portrayed a decrease of 78.1%. CONCLUSIONS 1. Estimation and Application of Wood Consumption for Public Buildings: A methodology was proposed to calculate the raw-wood consumption for public buildings in the education and social sectors in 2020. When applied to two public buildings in South Korea (one each in Suwon and Yeongju), the estimated wood consumption was higher than the actual usage, emphasizing the need to consider wood structure ratios and pricing for estimations. 2. Predicting Future Wood Consumption: The future wood consumption in South Korea in the construction sector was predicted by altering the ratio of wooden structures. For the current ratio, the analysis indicated a 40% decrease in the wood consumption by 2050; however, increasing the wooden structure ratio in large buildings increased the wood consumption. 3. Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) Goals and Wood Carbon Sequestration: An increase in wood production is necessary to achieve the NDC goals. Maintaining the current wooden structure ratio contributes a small percentage; thus, it is important to increase the wooden structure ratio in large buildings. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by the National Institute of Forest Science (NIFoS) grant funded by the Korean Government. REFERENCES CITED Amiri, A., Ottelin, J., Sorvari, J., and Junnila, S. (2020). “Cities as carbon sinks— classification of wooden buildings,” Environ. Res. Lett. 15, article 094076. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aba134 Augiseau, V., and Barles, S. (2017). “Studying construction materials flows and stock: A review,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 123, 153-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.002 Buchanan, A., and Honey, B. (1994). “Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction,” Energy Build. 20(3), 205-217. DOI: 10.1016/0378- 7788(94)90024-8 Cordier, S., Robichaud, F., Blanchet, P., and Amor, B. (2020). “Exploring the regional- scale potential of the use of wood products in Non-residential buildings: A Building permits-based quantitative approach,” BioResources 15(1), 787-813. DOI: PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6636 10.15376/biores.15.1.787-813 European Commission (2014). “Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee on the regions,” COM_2014_497. COM_2014_0445_FIN, European Commission, (http://ec.europa.eu/atwork/pdf/cwp_2017_en.pdf). Geskin Conseil (2008). Etude de Marché sur l’Utilisation Potentielle du Bois dans la Construction Non-résidentielle au Québec [Market Study on the Potential Use of Wood in Non-Residential Construction in Quebec] (Internal Report), Geskin Conseil Inc., Quebec, Canada. Gosselin, A., Blanchet, P., Lehoux, N., and Cimon, Y. (2017). “Main motivations and barriers for using wood in multi-storey and non-residential construction projects,” BioResources 12(1), 546-570. DOI: 10.15376/biores.12.1.546–570 Han, Y., Park, J.-H., Chang, Y.-S., Park, Y., Oh, J.-K., Hong, J.-P., Lee, J.-J., and Yeo, H. (2016). “The effect of controlling the drying distortion of laminas on the production yield of cross-laminated timber (CLT) using Larix kaempferi wood,” Eur. J. Wood Prod. 74(4), 519–526. DOI: 10.1007/s00107-016-1008-3 Han, Y., and Lee, S.-M. (2021). “Investigation on the awareness and preference for wood culture to promote the value of wood: I. Awareness of wood and cultural experience,” J. Korean. Wood Sci. Technol. 49(6), 616-642. DOI: 10.5658/WOOD.2021.49.6.616 Korea Environmental Corporation (2022). Price Survey for Recyclable Resources, Korea Environmental Corporation, Incheon, Republic of Korea. DOI: kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=392&tblId=DT_AA12&conn_path=I3 Korea Forest Service (2021a). Market Survey of Timber Productions 2021.11., Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. Korea Forest Service (2021b). Strategic for Achieving Carbon Neutrality by 2050 in the Forestry Sector (Internal Report), Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. Korea Forestry Promotion Institute (2022). Market Price Trends of Domestic Timber in the 4th Quarter of 2021, Korea Forestry Promotion Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Milaj, K., Sinha, A., Mliiler, T. H., and Tokarczyk, J. A. (2017). “Environmental utility of wood substitution in commercial buildings using life-cycle analysis,” Wood Fiber Sci. 49(3), article 21. DOI: wfs.swst.org/index.php/wfs/article/view/2600/2361 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2022). 2021 Statistical Yearbook of MOLIT, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea. National Institute of Forest Science (2019). White Paper on Design and Construction of Multi-storey Timber Building at the National Institute of Forest Science: HAN-Green wooden building, Seoul, Republic of Korea. National Institute of Forest Science (2020). White Paper on Design and Construction of Multi-storey Timber Building at the National Institute of Forest Science: General Research Building of Forest Bioresources Department, Seoul, Republic of Korea. National Institute of Forest Science (2024). Outlook of Forest and Forestry in 2014: A Better Korea through Forest and Scientific Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Pierobon, F., Huang, M., Simonen, K., and Ganguly, I. (2019). “Environmental benefits of using hybrid CLT structure in midrise non-residential construction,” J. Build. Eng. 26, article 100862. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100862 Ruschi Mendes Saade, M., Guest, G., and Amor, B. (2020). “Comparative whole building LCAs: How far are our expectations from the documented evidence?” Build. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Kim et al. (2024). “Wood use in public buildings,” BioResources 19(3), 6621-6637. 6637 Environ. 167, article 106449. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106449 Statistics Korea (2022). Population Projections for Korea: 2020–2070 (Based on the 2020 Population Census), Daejeon, Republic of Korea. United Nations (2015). Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, December 12, 2015. United Nations, Paris. Article submitted: March 16, 2024; Peer review completed: April 12, 2024; Revised version received: April 13, 2024; Accepted: May 26, 2024; Published: July 27, 2024. DOI: 10.15376/biores.19.3.6621-6637