PEER-REVIEW ARTICLE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7405 Designing Wooden Lounge Chairs Using ZMET: From Deep Need Discovery to Value Hierarchy Construction Yong Han ,a,b Wumin Ouyang ,a,b Hemin Du ,a,b,* Zebin Qiao,c and Daren Wei ,a Traditional furniture design methods often fall short in revealing users’ deeper psychological and emotional needs. This study innovatively introduced the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (ZMET) as an exploratory tool in the field of furniture design to bridge the cognitive gap between latent user needs and practical design. Through image collection, laddering interviews, and Kelly Repertory Grid Technique (RGT), cognitive modeling was conducted with six high-involvement users. A total of 119 concepts were identified, covering ten design attributes (e.g., “ergonomic fit,” “warm color tones”), seven emotional needs (e.g., “stress relief,” “immersive experience”), and five value hierarchies (e.g., “sense of belonging,” “self-actualization”). The resulting Hierarchical Value Map (HVM) illustrated a three-level structure of “attribute–consequence– value,” clearly mapping the psychological pathway from product features to core user values. The findings revealed that users expect more than basic functionality from wooden lounge chairs, seeking emotional resonance, lifestyle alignment, and identity expression. ZMET was shown to be effective in uncovering non-verbalized user needs and offers a theoretical and methodological framework for value-driven, user-centered furniture design. DOI: 10.15376/biores.20.3.7405-7420 Keywords: Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (ZMET); Deep need discovery; Wooden lounge chair design; Hierarchical value map (HVM); User-centered design Contact information: a: Faculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Macau; b: School of Design and Innovation, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China; c: Department of Design, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, China; * Corresponding author: DUHEMIN@SZTU.EDU.CN INTRODUCTION Understanding users’ true needs and emotional values is critical for innovation in contemporary furniture design (Norman 2007). In recent years, user-centered design has gained prominence, encouraging designers to move beyond superficial functionality toward deeper insights into users’ psychological and subconscious motivations (Li and Hölttä-Otto et al. 2018). According to the Kano model, user satisfaction is positively associated with the degree to which their needs are fulfilled (Kano 1984). Product design, particularly in furniture, plays a key role in influencing purchasing decisions, making user- driven innovation vital for market success (Zhao and Xu 2023). Despite this, users often struggle to articulate their innermost desires, creating a disconnect between product offerings and actual expectations (Chamorro-Koc et al. 2008). This issue is particularly pronounced in wooden furniture design, where the material’s inherent warmth and emotional associations are difficult to express through traditional verbal tools such as surveys or interviews. Wooden lounge chairs, which are commonly associated with PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7406 relaxation and comfort (Zhao and Xu 2023), require design methods that delve into both physical ergonomics and psychological resonance. While prior research has employed physiological indicators such as pressure distribution, eye tracking, EMG, and EEG to evaluate seating comfort objectively (Zhu and Lv 2023; Lim et al. 2020; Kim et al. 2016), these approaches often neglect users’ emotional engagement (Lei et al 2024). Wooden furniture, as a hybrid of functionality and emotional symbolism, necessitates methodologies capable of exploring subconscious perceptions and value-based design intentions (Kaputa et al. 2018). Traditional interview methods are limited by linguistic constraints and often fail to access users’ implicit emotional cognition expressed through imagery or metaphor (Mulvey and Kavalam 2010). ZMET, with its image-metaphor and laddering mechanism, offers a promising alternative for uncovering unspoken user needs. This study is the first to apply ZMET systematically within furniture design, aiming to construct a pathway from user perception to core value realization. In doing so, the study enriches user research theory and supports enterprises in reducing material waste, shortening development cycles, and advancing sustainable and intelligent manufacturing. LITERATURE REVIEW Conventional qualitative methods, such as interviews alone, often lack the depth necessary to reveal the subconscious value perceptions embedded in users’ minds (Mulvey and Kavalam 2010). In response to this limitation, Zaltman and Coulter (1995) developed the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (ZMET) method, which enables researchers to explore user thinking through images, stories, and metaphors. ZMET’s advantages include its capacity to elicit multisensory experiences and implicit thoughts that are difficult to verbalize (Ji and King 2018). As a structured research method, ZMET helps designers understand users’ internal motivations, attitudes, and product-related values, especially in early design stages. It also identifies pain points and new opportunities for innovation. Research by Ganassali and Matysiewicz (2018) indicates that image-based elicitation yields richer emotional granularity and captures the contextual meaning of user experiences more effectively. ZMET is grounded in the premise that 85% of human thinking is image-based, with most perceptions occurring at the subconscious level (Zaltman 1996, 1997). In ZMET interviews, participants select images to represent their perceptions and feelings about a product, and these images serve as surface metaphors for deeper cognitive and emotional structures (Coulter et al. 2001). ZMET has been widely adopted in commercial contexts (e.g., Audi, Coca-Cola, Mercedes-Benz) and in academic fields such as brand association (Hogan et al. 2016; Jain et al. 2018), value construction (Seo and Buchanan-Oliver 2019), consumer decision- making (Christensen and Olson 2002; Micu and Plummer 2010), and graphic design (Hancock and Foster 2020). Olson et al. (2009) also highlighted ZMET’s application in service design, demonstrating how it supported architects in creating emotionally resonant environments in pediatric care. Despite its diverse applications, ZMET remains underutilized in furniture design—particularly for wooden furniture, where emotional perception is key. This study aims to address this gap by systematically applying ZMET to uncover users’ deep-seated emotional and value-based expectations for wooden lounge chairs. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7407 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY Participants A preliminary screening was conducted using the Bauer et al (2006) product involvement scale. From over 20 participants, six high-involvement users were selected (scores≥30; average age 26.5; 3 males and 3 females), all of whom used lounge chairs for 7 to 9 hours daily across diverse scenarios such as home offices, study, and leisure. The sample met the “data saturation” principle (Coulter and Zaltman 1994). Research Phases The first and most crucial step in product design is to uncover and define user needs. Only when a product’s inherent attributes align with user expectations can it occupy a meaningful place in the market. The Means-End Chain (MEC) theory serves as the theoretical foundation of ZMET (Baker et al. 2004). As shown in Fig. 1, MEC provides a hierarchical value model that links product attributes (design features), consequences (psychological needs), and end values (deep-seated user values), forming a conceptual chain from concrete to abstract dimensions (Ha and Jang 2013). Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the MEC structure ZMET operationalizes this framework by guiding participants from discussing tangible features toward revealing the personal meanings and value structures they associate with a product or service. In this study, ZMET was applied to wooden lounge chair design, with the complete research flow illustrated in Fig. 2. Fig. 2. Design process of wooden lounge chairs based on the ZMET method PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7408 ZMET’s original framework consists of ten procedural steps. However, researchers may adapt or omit certain steps depending on the research context (Khoo-Lattimore and Prideaux 2013). For this study, the ZMET process was divided into three main phases: (1) Pre-interview preparation; (2) Mental model elicitation (interviews); and (3) Information analysis and HVM construction (Fig. 3). Fig. 3. Three stages and interview steps of ZMET Pre-interview preparation Approximately one week prior to the interviews, researchers conducted a 15 to 20 minute briefing session with each participant to introduce the research objectives and procedures. Participants were then instructed to collect approximately ten images related to the theme of their “ideal wooden lounge chair”. These images, gathered from diverse sources such as websites, posters, comics, or personal photographs, were expected to reflect their thoughts and feelings when using such a chair. Importantly, participants were explicitly asked to avoid selecting images that directly depicted any type of chair or seating furniture. Mental model elicitation (interviews) In-depth interviews were conducted as the primary method for accessing users’ implicit knowledge and mental representations. This qualitative approach enabled researchers to gather rich, internalized insights that would otherwise be difficult to obtain through surface-level questioning. Throughout the interviews, both verbal responses and participants’ accompanying gestures or behavioral cues were carefully observed and recorded. To illustrate the ZMET process in detail, this paper presents the complete interview and analysis workflow for Participant 01, a 26-year-old individual who scored 36 points on the product involvement scale. The following section outlines the step-by-step procedure used to collect and interpret this participant’s cognitive imagery and conceptual associations. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7409 Step 1. Eliciting mental images (story telling) At this stage, participants were invited to reflect on their thoughts and feelings regarding their “ideal wooden lounge chair.” Using the laddering interview technique, the researchers conducted one-on-one in-depth interviews to extract key concepts based on Means-End Chain (MEC) theory. The MEC method, implemented through face-to-face interviews combined with laddering as a probing strategy, serves as a critical tool to explore user preferences concerning product attributes and services. This approach facilitates the identification of the core elements and linkages among Attributes (A), Consequences (C), and Values (V), guiding participants step by step up the abstraction ladder—from concrete features to psychological needs and ultimately to underlying personal values. During the laddering process, probing questions were used in tandem with the “soft laddering” technique to uncover the three-level associations of “attributes–consequences–values” and to construct their interrelationships. Each A–C–V linkage is referred to as a “ladder.” A summary of participant responses collected in this phase is presented in Appendix S1. Step 2. Description of unavailable image Participants were asked to describe an ideal image of a wooden lounge chair that they searched for but could not find. This step aimed to reveal unmet expectations. Key concepts extracted are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of Participant Interviews (Step 2) Description of the Unfound Image Interview Notes A mother is knitting a very cute hat for her child with fluffy yarn. Q: What elements in this unfound picture relate to the research theme? A: The materials used for children's items are soft and skin friendly. Q: Is softness and being skin-friendly important to you? Why? A: It reminds me of a mother’s hands and hugs, giving a warm feeling. Q: Is the feeling of warmth important? Why? A: Home is a person’s lifelong haven. It can soothe the soul and make people calm down. Concept Extraction Soft material; Skin-friendly; Warm feeling; Soothing the body and mind Step 3. Image categorization task Participants were asked to categorize the selected images and explain their classification criteria and labeling rationale. The summaries of their responses are presented in Table 2. Step 4: Identifying similarities and differences in image classification The RGT, widely used in psychology, originates from personal construct theory developed by American psychologist George Kelly (Siraj-Blatchford 1995). Following the RGT framework, participants were asked to select one image from a set of three that differed from the other two and to explain their reasoning. This selection process was repeated iteratively. It is important to note that interviewers avoided leading participants toward any particular concept. The procedure and results are summarized in Table 3. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7410 Table 2. Summary of Participant Interviews (Step 3) Number Image Description Labels A Lying, sitting, or reclining are all comfortable and relaxing. After a tiring day, we really need to relieve tension, ease fatigue, and enjoy life. It has a warm, home-like feeling. Warm and Comfortable B One is small and delicate, the other can be folded. They save space, are easy to move, and are not labor-intensive. The shape is beautiful. Delicate and Portable C I can accept both modern and traditional styles, as long as the color combination is harmonious and aesthetically pleasing. Harmonious Color Tones D The chair offers a stretching experience and additional functions. In a healthy lifestyle environment, it can protect my waist. Comfortable and Healthy Table 3. Summary of Participant Interviews (Step 4) Similar Different Description The first two primarily focus on psychological feelings, with the chair providing relaxation and pleasure. The right image focuses more on the harmony and brightness of color, which attracts attention and satisfies personal taste. Concept Extraction Comfortable; Harmonious colors; Relaxed and pleasant; Self-worth Step 5. Most representative image Participants were asked to select the image that best represented the research theme and to explain their choice. Step 6. Opposite-meaning image Participants were also asked to identify an image that conveyed a meaning opposite to the research theme. The selected images and participants’ explanations are summarized in Table 4. Table 4. Summary of Selected Images and Explanations (Steps 5-6) Image Reason for Selection The Most Representative Image I can enjoy life alone, without having to rush around for promotion and pay raise. Keep a peaceful mind. The Image with the Opposite Meaning Its color tone is ordinary, and its styling features are too traditional and lack artistic sense. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7411 Step 7. Sensory associations Participants were asked to describe their ideal lounge chair using sensory perceptions, including taste, touch, smell, hearing, vision, and overall feeling. The results are summarized in Table 5. Table 5. Summary of Sensory Associations (Steps 7) Resembles Does Not Resemble Taste Soda water Fried chicken and barbecue flavors Smell Urban forest in spring The smell of cheap strong perfume Sound Faint wooden fish sounds in a temple The sharp sound of fingernails scratching Touch As soft and skin - friendly as pajamas Grease on the table Sight Light warm yellow Black or other dull colors Emotional As calm and relaxed as meditation Restless and annoying Step 8. Construction of the user mind map Following the interviews, researchers promptly constructed mind maps for each participant. This process involved reviewing interview recordings, systematically extracting and organizing the various concepts mentioned by the participants, and subsequently inviting the participants to review and revise the drafted cognitive maps. An example mind map for Participant 01 is shown in Fig. 4. Fig. 4. Mind map of participant 01 Information analysis and HVM construction Users often interpret the same image differently; however, the ZMET method enables the exploration of their deep-seated thoughts and feelings. When users select certain product attributes that satisfy their needs, they are effectively affirming the underlying values associated with those attributes. By ranking these values according to their importance, users identify the values most relevant to themselves. In this study, product concepts extracted from the cognitive data of six participants were summarized, categorized, and coded based on Attributes (design features), Consequences (users’ psychological or emotional needs), and Values (users’ value systems). A total of 119 concepts were generated (Table 6). The Hierarchical Value Map (HVM), also known as the consensus map, includes only concepts mentioned by at least one-third of the participants, and the relationships between concepts must be referenced by at least one-quarter of them (Zaltman and Coulter PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7412 1995). After consultation with the participants, concepts from the initial 119 coded items (attributes–consequences–values) that did not meet these criteria were removed, resulting in the finalized HVM for wooden lounge chairs (Fig. 5). Only the most significant concepts are displayed in the HVM, following further participant validation and the exclusion of less relevant items. Table 6. Classification of 119 Concepts Design Features (Attributes) Psychological Needs (Consequences) User Values (Values) Specific Abstract Functional Psychological Instrumental Ultimate Easy to clean Soft to the touch Stretching support Energetic Sense of independence Optimistic attitude Lint-resistant Rhythmic form Agile Cost-effective Leadership aspiration Being respected Freedom of posture Sense of enclosure Easy to use Stress relief Sense of responsibility Sense of belief Adjustable Ergonomically designed Joint relaxation Appreciation of novelty Sense of pleasure Sense of freedom Light-toned Quiet environment Portability Sense of relaxation Feeling accompanied Sense of self- esteem Metal components Warm-toned Burden reduction Delightful surprise Sense of cleanliness and order Happiness and satisfaction Storage- integrated Personalized operation Muscle relaxation Immersive experience Creativity Sense of achievement Space- efficient size Fluffy Effort-saving Inner peace Sincerity Sense of belonging Integrated massage function Minimalist design Mental clarity Sense of trust Stimulated imagination Sense of security Warm-toned Distinctive form Sleep-aiding Emotional calmness Affordable sense of luxury Social recognition Wooden material Modern lifestyle Physical well-being Usefulness Pursuit of pleasure Self-fulfillment Stainless steel Streamlined Visually pleasing Practical value Eco-values Airbag Smooth strength Being respected Personal space Easy to disassemble Artistic Upright posture Aesthetic appreciation Sandalwood scent Customizable Enhanced efficiency Feeling cared for Smart features Body-conforming Sense of humor Leather Entertainment function Sense of sharing Frosted Breathable Open-minded Innovative material Sturdy Sense of order Elastic cushioning Modern Fashionable Design-sense Unrestrained Plain and elegant Sense of reliability Distinguishable Lightweight design Skin-friendly Durable structure PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7413 Fig. 5. HVM for wooden lounge chairs Analysis of ZMET Results Within the overall application of the ZMET methodology, constructing the HVM represents the core analytical phase. The HVM is not only the final outcome of ZMET analysis, but it also serves as a cognitive tool for visualizing users’ mental models and guiding product design optimization. While ZMET provides the research framework and methodological path, the HVM delivers a quantifiable and applicable representation of the results. The HVM clearly illustrates the core concepts associated with wooden lounge chairs and reveals a typical “Attribute–Consequence–Value” (A–C–V) chain. This structure reflects how users progress from specific product features, to positive psychological perceptions, and ultimately to deeply held personal values. At the attribute level, the HVM identifies ten key product features: body- conforming design, skin-friendly materials, a sense of enclosure, easy to clean, warm color tones, modern and stylish aesthetics, refined simplicity, ergonomic compliance, adjustability, and streamlined form. These attributes, ranked by frequency of mention, can serve as essential references in future design optimization. By comparing existing wooden lounge chairs against these features, designers can identify unmet user needs. At the consequence level (reflecting users’ psychological or emotional responses), seven concepts were identified: stress relief, immersive experience, physical well-being, calmness and relaxation, enhanced productivity, graceful posture, and a sense of order. These express the emotional and experiential dimensions of chair use and reflect users’ perception of the lounge chair as a form of personal space. At the value level, five core values were revealed: comfortable living, sense of belonging, self-actualization, pleasure, and inner peace. These values represent users’ ultimate expectations and aspirations regarding the product. These user needs and value-oriented expectations provide critical guidance for future product optimization. Many of these expectations are not yet fully addressed by existing market offerings. Researchers are encouraged to revisit interview recordings, analyze participant-provided materials, and review both cognitive and hierarchical value maps. This reflective process can yield valuable insights and divergent thinking that are crucial for driving innovative, user-centered design. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7414 DESIGNING WOODEN LOUNGE CHAIRS BASED ON THE HVM The HVM serves not only as the final output of ZMET analysis but also as a cognitive framework for revealing users’ mental models and guiding product optimization. By analyzing the HVM, the “Attribute–Consequence–Value” (A–C–V) chain was identified, which corresponds to the three-tier relationship of design features– psychological needs–user values. Grounded in the insights provided by the HVM, this study takes an existing lounge chair developed by a company as the starting point for a design iteration. Design Concept Based on the HVM’s three-tier structure—Attributes (design features), Consequences (psychological or emotional needs), and Values (user value systems)—the design of the lounge chair aims to fulfill users’ aspirations for comfortable living, a sense of belonging, self-actualization, pleasure, and inner peace. Accordingly, the core value proposition of the design is defined by three guiding principles: comfort, health, and relaxation. In terms of form and materials, the design must embody key product attributes identified in the HVM, including body-conforming ergonomics, ease of cleaning, skin- friendly materials, a sense of enclosure, modern and stylish aesthetics, warm color tones, refined simplicity, ergonomic compliance, adjustability, and streamlined form. To align with these insights, a design optimization was conducted based on the existing product DNA of a company’s current lounge chair. As shown in Fig. 6, the proposed design concept is named “Chair U”. The name “U” refers to the chair’s top-view contour, which resembles the letter “U” (Fig. 7). This U-shaped form addresses users’ expectations for a sense of enclosure, fluid contours, and refined simplicity—features not fully achieved in the original version. By integrating these design features, the optimized lounge chair enhances users’ experiences of pleasure, comfort, and well-being. Fig. 6. Sketch (left) and design rendering (right) Design Description Form and emotional expression As shown in Fig. 7, the armrest structure adopts concentric curves and asymmetrical contouring, resulting in an overall U-shaped form. This not only meets users’ expectations in terms of product attributes but also provides a calming and relaxing visual experience, which helps reduce anxiety and stress. From a side view, the armrest outlines PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7415 appear more streamlined compared to the straight lines of the original product, thereby fulfilling the HVM-defined attribute of body-conforming design. To address issues raised during retrospective interviews—specifically, that smooth armrest surfaces led to slippage when users rested their arms—the redesigned armrests have been slightly widened and extended upward. This improves ergonomic performance and enhances stability. Additionally, the backrest angle is made adjustable, allowing users to modify the reclining position according to personal comfort. This adjustment aligns with the key design features of body-conformity and adjustability, supporting users’ core values of pleasure and comfortable living. Materials, color, and sensory expression Material selection was guided by key user expectations identified in the HVM, including skin-friendly texture, ease of cleaning, warm color tones, and modern aesthetics, all of which correspond to users’ value pursuits of comfortable living and inner peace. The “Chair U” design adopts walnut wood for its main structural frame—a material that conveys a sense of natural warmth, density, and quality. For the contact surfaces, high-quality breathable PU leather was selected for its waterproof, stain-resistant, and lint-repellent properties. The interior cushioning is filled with high-resilience foam, providing an enhanced sense of enclosure. Combined with the overall concentric form language, the lounge chair fully addresses the key attributes outlined in the HVM. The structural fasteners are primarily made of stainless steel, which both meets the product’s performance requirements and ensures mechanical stability. The interplay between the metallic sheen and PU surfaces further emphasizes the design features of modernity and refined simplicity. As shown in Fig. 7, the primary color palette of the lounge chair was derived from the most frequently mentioned color terms and image selections provided by ZMET participants. The combination of walnut brown and cream white, both within the warm color spectrum, enhances the chair’s natural and inviting aesthetic. Visually, it conveys warmth and emotional comfort, while also aligning with the refined aesthetics of modern living. Fig. 7. Design rendering: Armrest detail (left) and top view rendering (right) PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7416 CONCLUSIONS 1. This study represents the first systematic application of the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (ZMET) in the field of furniture design, establishing a comprehensive pathway from image metaphors to user cognition to product transformation. Through in-depth interviews with six high-involvement users, a three-level linkage structure—comprising design attributes, psychological needs, and core values—was extracted. This provides both a theoretical foundation and practical reference for user-centered optimization of wooden furniture. 2. ZMET was able to effectively overcome the limitations of traditional verbal expression by evoking authentic, subconscious user perceptions, offering a novel paradigm for non-verbal user research. By guiding users from image representation to metaphorical association, the method was shown to expand the emotional dimension of design inquiry in the furniture domain. It enhanced the contextual relevance and perceived user value of design outcomes. The resulting HVM was shown in this work not only to help in product optimization and innovation, but also to serve as a tool for identifying value-driven opportunity spaces within the market. 3. It should be noted that this study focused on the psychological mechanisms behind users’ emotional and value-based engagement with wooden furniture, and therefore did not incorporate objective measurements such as ergonomic parameters or human posture simulations. Future research could broaden the participant base— for example, including elderly users or workplace scenarios—and integrate multimodal data sources such as EEG and eye-tracking. These efforts would offer technical validation of visual metaphor-driven design strategies and contribute to the development of a more robust methodology for emotion-centered furniture design. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Program of the Ministry of Education of China. The authors would also like to express their sincere gratitude to Huaqiao University and Xiamen Yirui Intelligent Manufacturing Co., Ltd. for their generous support in providing experimental facilities and assistance with product testing. Additionally, gratitude is extended to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article, as well as to the editor for their guidance and support throughout the review process. REFERENCES CITED Baker, S., Thompson, K. E., Engelken, J., and Huntley, K. (2004). “Mapping the values driving organic food choice: Germany vs the UK,” European Journal of Marketing 38(8), 995-1012. DOI: 10.1108/03090560410539131 Bauer, H. H., Sauer, N. E., and Becker, C. (2006). “Investigating the relationship between product involvement and consumer decision‐making styles,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 5(4), 342-354. DOI: 10.1002/cb.185 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7417 Chamorro-Koc, M., Popovic, V., and Emmison, M. (2008). “Using visual representation of concepts to explore users and designers' concepts of everyday products,” Design Studies 29(2), 142-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.005 Christensen, G. L., and Olson, J. C. (2002). “Mapping consumers’ mental models with ZMET,” Psychology & Marketing 19(6), 477-501. DOI: 10.1002/mar.10021 Coulter, R. A., Zaltman, G., and Coulter, K. S. (2001). “Interpreting consumer perceptions of advertising: An application of the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique,” Journal of Advertising 30(4), 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2001.10673648 Coulter, R. H., and Zaltman, G. (1994). “Using the Zaltman metaphor elicitation technique to understand brand images,” Advances in Consumer Research 21(1). Ganassali, S., and Matysiewicz, J. (2018). “Assessing visual survey protocols to capture brand-related emotional insights,” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 21(1), 2-17. DOI: 10.1108/QMR-09-2016-0080 Ha, J., and Jang, S. (2013). “Attributes, consequences, and consumer values: A means- end chain approach across restaurant segments,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 25(3), 383-409. Hancock, C., and Foster, C. (2020). “Exploring the ZMET methodology in services marketing,” Journal of Services Marketing 34(1), 48-58. DOI: 10.1108/JSM-11-2018- 0344 Hogan, S., Romaniuk, J., and Faulkner, M. (2016). “Comparing approaches to elicit brand attributes both face-to-face and online,” International Journal of Market Research 58(1), 57-78. DOI: 10.2501/IJMR-2015-011 Hölttä-Otto, K., Otto, K., Song, C., Luo, J., Li, T., Seepersad, C. C., and Seering, W. (2018). “The characteristics of innovative, mechanical products—10 years later,” Journal of Mechanical Design 140(8), article 084501. DOI: 10.1115/1.4039851 Jain, N. K., Kamboj, S., Kumar, V., and Rahman, Z. (2018). “Examining consumer-brand relationships on social media platforms,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning 36(1), 63-78. DOI: 10.1108/MIP-05-2017-0088 Ji, M., and King, B. (2018). “Explaining the embodied hospitality experience with ZMET,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 30(11), 3442-3461. DOI:10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0709 Kano, N. (1984). “Attractive quality and must-be quality,” Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control 31(4), 147-156. DOI: 10.20684/quality.14.2_147 Kaputa, V., Barčić, A. P., Maťová, H., and Motik, D. (2018). “Consumer preferences for wooden furniture in Croatia and Slovakia,” BioResources 13(3), 6280-6299. DOI: 10.15376/biores.13.3.6280-6299 Kim, D. W., Lee, D. W., Schreiber, J., Im, C. H., and Kim, H. (2016). “Integrative evaluation of automated massage combined with thermotherapy: Physical, physiological, and psychological viewpoints,” BioMed Research International 2016(1), article 2826905. DOI: 10.1155/2016/2826905 Lei, Y., Fu, L., Zhu, L., and Lv, J. (2024). “Wooden furniture design based on physiological-psychological measurement technology and Kansei engineering: Taking Ming-style chair as an example,” BioResources 19(3), 6304-6324. Li, J., and Hölttä-Otto, K. (2020). “The influence of designers’ cultural differences on the empathic accuracy of user understanding,” The Design Journal 23(5), 779-796. DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2020.1810414 Lim, J. Z., Mountstephens, J., and Teo, J. (2020). “Emotion recognition using eye- PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7418 tracking: Taxonomy, review and current challenges,” Sensors 20(8), article 2384. DOI: 10.3390/s20082384 Micu, A. C., and Plummer, J. T. (2010). “Measurable emotions: How television ads really work: Patterns of reactions to commercials can demonstrate advertising effectiveness,” Journal of Advertising Research 50(2), 137-153. DOI: 10.2501/S0021849910091300 Mulvey, M. S., and Kavalam, B. E. (2010). “Mining deeper meaning in consumer decision maps,” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 13(4), 372- 388. DOI: 10.1108/13522751011078809 Norman, D. (2007). Emotional design: ‘Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things,’ Basic Books, New York. Olson, J., Waltersdorff, K., Forr, J., and Zaltman, O. (2009). “Incorporating deep customer insights in the innovation process,” in: H. H. Hinterhuber, K. Matzler (eds), Kundenorientierte Unternehmensführung: Kundenorientierung— Kundenzufriedenheit—Kundenbindung 507-527. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-8349-8051- 9_22 Seo, Y., and Buchanan-Oliver, M. (2019). “Constructing a typology of luxury brand consumption practices,” Journal of Business Research 99, 414-421. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.019 Siraj-Blatchford, J. (1995). “Kelly's repertory grid: a technique for developing evaluation in design and technology,” Loughborough University. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/1526 Zaltman, G. (1997). “Rethinking market research: Putting people back in,” Journal of Marketing Research 34(4), 424-437. DOI: 10.1177/002224379703400402 Zaltman, G. (2003). “How customers think: Essential insights into the mind of the market,” Harvard Business Press. Zaltman, G. (1996). “Metaphorically speaking,” Marketing Research, 8(2), 13–20. Zaltman, G., and Coulter, R. H. (1995). “Seeing the voice of the customer: Metaphor- based advertising research,” Journal of Advertising Research 35(4), 35-51. Zhao, Y., and Xu, Y. (2023). “Evaluation model for modular children's wooden storage cabinet design,” BioResources 18(4), 7818-7838. DOI: 10.15376/biores.18.4.7818- 7838 Zhu, L., and Lv, J. (2023). “Review of studies on user research based on EEG and eye tracking,” Applied Sciences-Basel 13(11), article 6502. DOI: 10.3390/app13116502 Article submitted: March 17, 2025; Peer review completed: April 6, 2025; Revised version received and accepted: July 10, 2025; Published: July 21, 2025. DOI: 10.15376/biores.20.3.7405-7420 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7419 APPENDIX Table S1. Summary of Participant Interviews (Step 1) Number Image Interview Notes 01 Q: What elements in this image relate to your ideal lounge chair? A: The thin rope handle suggests it's easy to carry and doesn't take up much space. Q: Is portability important to you? Why? A: Yes, it’s convenient for moving or traveling. Q: What does convenience mean to you? A: (Example) When I move apartments, I won’t waste energy or hesitate about discarding it. Q: What does saving time and effort mean to you? A: It brings ease and freedom. Concept Lightweight; Portable; Saving time and effort; Ease and freedom 02 Q: What elements in this image relate to a good lounge chair? A: Sitting on it feels like floating on a soft cloud. Q: Is the softness of the material important? Why? A: It’s skin-friendly and feels very comfortable. Q: What does skin-friendliness mean to you? A: It means comfort, which makes me use it often. Q: Frequent use indicates what? A: It shows I like or rely on the product. Q: Is reliance and enjoyment important? Why? A: A reassuring product helps me enjoy life. Concept Soft surface; Skin-friendly; Comfortable; Sense of reliance; Enjoying life 03 Q: What elements relate to your ideal chair? A: Foldable, portable, space-saving. Q: Why is space-saving important? A: My apartment is small. Q: Would you choose a larger chair if you had more space? A: Probably not. I prefer compact, refined items. Q: What does compactness mean to you? A: It's a lifestyle—simple and elegant. Q: How do you define this attitude? A: It reflects minimalism and taste: “less is more.” Concept Compact form; Space-saving; Lifestyle; Simple and comfortable; Tastefulness 04 Q: What in this image relates to the ideal chair? A: It provides a private space for undisturbed personal time. Q: Why is this space important? A: It allows quiet reflection and meditation. Q: Do you value privacy? Why? A: Yes. At home I want to mentally unwind. Q: How does that relate to chairs? A: Being enveloped by the chair helps me relax and feel secure. Concept Privacy; Undisturbed; Enveloped feeling; Mental release; Relaxation and security 05 Q: What stands out in this image? A: It has a cyberpunk vibe; trendy color scheme. Q: What do the colors mean to you? A: They’re stylish. Chairs shouldn't be dull. Q: What does being trendy mean? A: Individuality! Q: Why do you value uniqueness? A: It shows personal taste and character. Concept Fashionable color; Trendy; Individuality; Tasteful; Self-expression PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Han et al. (2025). “Designing Lounge Chairs Using ZMET,” BioResources 20(3), 7405-7420. 7420 Table S1. (Continued) Summary of Participant Interviews (Step 1) Number Picture Interview Notes 06 Q: What element relates to the theme? A: The chair should be more than just a seat. Q: What do you mean? A: I plan to get a pet. If my pet likes the chair, I’ll like it more. Q: Is “shared use with pets” important? A: Yes, it becomes a medium for bonding. Q: What does bonding with pets mean to you? A: It gives me a sense of companionship, like home. Concept Multifunctionality; Shared with pets; Companionship; Sense of home; Warmth 07 Q: What element relates to the chair theme? A: Sitting too long hurts my back, but I’m lazy to exercise. Q: What does health mean to you? A: A good chair keeps me healthy so I can enjoy life. Q: What would you do with good health? A: Go out on weekends to relieve fatigue. Q: How does that impact your lifestyle? A: It improves mood and keeps me optimistic. Concept Health; Relieving fatigue; Good mood; Optimism 08 Q: What in this image relates to your ideal chair? A: Like slouching comfortably (“Ge You” style) — very relaxing. Q: What does that comfort mean to you? A: True relaxation — physical and emotional relief. Concept Unrestricted posture; Comfort; Stress relief; Freedom 09 Q: What stands out in this image? A: Like a seed sprouting — when I sit, I feel stretched. A light green tone would be perfect. Q: What does body stretching mean? A: Helps avoid hunching, makes me look tall. Q: Why care about posture? A: Makes people like me. I feel attractive. Q: Can you describe the feeling? A: It boosts my mood and enhances creativity. Concept Stretchability; Upright posture; Pleasant feeling; Good mood; Creativity & productivity 10 Q: What elements relate to your ideal chair? A: It has Chinese aesthetics — elegant colors and a modern mix of tradition and metal. Q: What do traditional elements mean to you? A: Balance between old and new — inclusiveness. Q: What do you mean by inclusiveness? A: Openness without being showy or outdated — harmony. Q: What does harmony mean? A: Beauty and peace of mind. Concept Chinese aesthetics; Harmonious color; Inclusive; Balanced; Peace of mind