PEER-REVIEW ARTICLE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9785 Influence of Some Biostimulants Combined with Zinc and Boron Oxides on the Performance of Date Palm Walid F. A. Mosa ,a,* Khalid F. Almutairi ,b,* and Lidia Sas-Paszt ,c Although chemical fertilizers increase plant growth and crop yields, their usage over a long period harms soil health, damages the beneficial microorganisms, and reduces soil fertility. Therefore, there is interest in using natural biostimulants in agriculture instead of chemical fertilizers. This study aimed to examine how spraying with zinc (ZnO) and boron (B2O3) oxides, as well as the biostimulants yeast extract (YE) and seaweed extract (SWE), and their combinations affect the yield and fruit quality of Barhi date palm. The trees were sprayed four times starting from mid of February with one month between each two sprays with 50 mg/L ZnO + 50 mg/L B2O3; 100 mg/L ZnO + 100 mg/L B2O3; 0.2% or 0.4% YE; 0.2% or 0.4% SWE; 50 mg/L ZnO + 50 mg/L B2O3 + 0.2 % YE + 0.2 % SWE, (combination 1); 100 mg/L ZnO + 100 mg/L B2O3 + 0.4% YE + 0.4% SWE (combination 2) compared to not-treated trees. The results indicated that applying ZnO and B2O3, YE and SWE either individually or in combination effectively enhanced the productivity and fruit quality of the date palm cv. Barhi compared to the control. The results also showed that the combined application gave a larger improvement in the measured parameters, particularly combination 2, which was the best treatment, followed by combination 1. DOI: 10.15376/biores.20.4.9785-9803 Keywords: Date palm; Productivity; Fruit quality; Seaweed extract; Zinc; Yeast extract Contact information: a: Plant Production Department (Horticulture-Pomology), Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt; b: Department of Plant Production, College of Food Science and Agriculture, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; c: The National Institute of Horticultural Research, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland; *Corresponding authors: walidmosa@alexu.edu.eg; almutairik@ksu.edu.sa INTRODUCTION Although synthetic fertilizers boost crop yields and support development, their extensive application can cause serious issues, such as soil salinity and compaction, which decrease soil fertility, enhance pesticide reliance, and pollute water sources (Shambhavi et al. 2017). The use of traditional mineral fertilizers has surged significantly due to rapid global population growth and rising food demand (Benson et al. 2018). Consequently, there is a pressing need to develop and implement new alternative inputs for crop production, such as biostimulants that improve the nutrition of plants, absorption of nutrients, productivity, and fruit (Al-Saif et al. 2023a). A plant biostimulant is any substance or microorganism that, when applied to plants, enhances nutrient uptake, improves nutritional efficiency, boosts yield, improves fruit quality, and increases tolerance to abiotic stresses. The use of biostimulants is considered an effective alternative to minimize the reliance on chemical fertilizers. These biostimulants provide necessary macro- and micronutrients, as well as plant hormones such https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1954-502X https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0826-4241 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4076-4032 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9786 as gibberellins, auxins, and cytokinins. They are safe for soil and do not negatively impact soil properties (Caradonia et al. 2019; Rouphael and Colla 2020). In addition, they are inexpensive and simple to prepare and apply (Suhail 2013). The date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) has served as a vital food security crop in the Middle East and North Africa for over 5,000 years (Ghnimi et al. 2017). In Egypt, it is one of the most significant fruit crops, covering an area of 72,395 thousand hectares and yielding approximately 1,867 million tons (FAO 2023). The fruit is rich in dietary fibers, carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, minerals, phenolic and tannin compounds, along with antioxidants (Al-Alawi et al. 2017; Bentrad and Hamida-Ferhat 2020). Date fruits are highly nutritious, rich in carbohydrates (mainly fructose and glucose, ~70%), dietary fiber, protein, and vitamin B-complex. They also provide fundamental minerals including Ca, Fe, Mg, K, Zn, and Se, which make them valuable food with potential health benefits (Aljaloud et al. 2020). Seaweed extract (SWE) is a natural and inexpensive source of plant growth regulators; cytokinins, auxins, and gibberellins, which are related to nutrient solubility; thus, much more attention should be given to the usage of SWE to raise the immunity of the plants and improve their growth under environmental stress (Gullón et al. 2020). SWEs are large, multicellular organisms that are rich in lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, and enzymes, and can withstand extreme conditions like heat, salinity, drought, frost, and intense light (Patel et al. 2020), and a shortage of necessary elements (Battacharyya et al. 2015). The application of SWE improved the elongation and division of the plant cell which consequently increased the shoot length and leaf area (Colavita et al. 2011). SWE has been found to promote absorption of nutrients from the soil (El Boukhari et al. 2020). SWE is distinguished by its high content from organic and amino acids, and antioxidants, such that it can be considered a plant growth stimulator (Spinelli et al. 2009). Other macro- and micronutrients present in SWE include phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, carbon, sulfur, calcium, boron, cobalt, iron, silicon, molybdenum, selenium, manganese and zinc (Parthiban et al. 2013). Using biostimulants, such as natural extracts from SWE, offers a sustainable way to increase food production without harming the environment (Hernández- Herrera et al. 2014). SWE is considered a natural and inexpensive biostimulant that is rich in different components such as sterols, nitrogen-containing compounds, micro- and macronutrients, amino acids, vitamins, cytokinin, auxin, and abscisic acid. Therefore, it enhances the growth of roots, root hairs, and secondary roots, which consequently improves the fruit setting, nutrient uptake, facilitates water absorption, increases chlorophyll content, and boosts flowering and fruit formation. Additionally, SWE enhances photosynthetic activity, as well as the quantity and quality of the fruit (Begum et al. 2018; Nikoogoftar-Sedghi et al. 2023). Murtic et al. (2018) reported that SWE contains aspartic acid, isoleucine, proline, valine, amino acids, along with micronutrients and vitamins that enhance crop tolerance to environmental stress. Sarhan and Abdullah (2010) documented that because Yeast Extract (YE) is characterized by a high content of many active compounds such as amino acids, hormones, and vitamins, which improve plant growth, it is considered a biostimulant. Because YE contains a combination of carbohydrates, amino acids, minerals, enzymes, vitamins, sugars, B complex vitamins, and peptides, it could be a biostimulant (Marzauk et al. 2014). YE functions as a microbial plant growth enhancer, promoting development and boosting productivity (El-Serafy 2018), and alleviating biotic and abiotic stresses (Fu et al. 2016). Moreover, YE is rich in different components, such as vitamins, minerals, amino acids, cytokinins, and auxin, so it has a remarkable influence on improving the vegetative growth, PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9787 flower formation, productivity, and carbohydrate accumulation (Dawood et al. 2019). Foliar application of YE enhanced growth, flower development, and final yield, due to its rich content of vitamins, amino acids, minerals, and phytohormones, particularly cytokinins and gibberellins (Hamed et al. 2019). Besides, YE helps in the conversion of insoluble phosphorus to a soluble form (Kalayu 2019). Because it is rich in proteins, B vitamins, amino acids, and cytokinins, YE promotes cell growth, the development of shoots and roots, chloroplast maturation, and the synthesis of nucleic acids, proteins, and chlorophyll (Hassan et al. 2020). YE acts as a cost-effective biofertilizer that enhances plant nourishment and vitality, increasing their resistance to abiotic stress. It is environmentally friendly and can be applied via soil or foliar techniques on diverse crops (Abd-Alrahman and Aboud 2021). Boron is an immobile element that transfers with difficulty from source organs to young buds. The resulting shortage of B results in small flowers, incomplete pistils, floral abortion, reduced pollen viability, and ultimately depression in fruit set percentage (Botelho et al. 2022). These problems are related to the depletion of carbohydrate translocation and lower starch content in them (Rerkasem et al. 2020). It also affects key metabolic processes, resulting in reduced shoot growth, lower fruit set percentages, diminished fruit quality, and altered nutrient composition of the fruits (Davarpanah et al. 2016). Additionally, boric acid enhances root growth by supplying carbohydrates needed for root development (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2018). It is an essential, immobile micronutrient vital for plant growth, particularly in pollen germination, tube elongation, and overall reproductive development (Saini et al. 2019; Sharafi and Raina 2021). The shortage of boron in plants delays pollen germination, reduces the growth of the pollen tube, and disrupts the flowering and fruit set (Brdar-Jokanović 2020). In fruit trees, boron supports key stages such as pollination, fertilization, and fruit set, while also playing a crucial role in carbohydrate metabolism, sugar transport, cell wall formation, and respiration. Additionally, it supports pollen viability, leaf elongation, pollen germination, and pollen tube growth, as well as being essential for flower production and retention, seed and fruit development, and facilitating the transport of water, nutrients, and carbohydrates to actively growing tissues (Hadi and Saleh 2021). Zhao et al. (2012) stated that zinc enhances chlorophyll and carotenoid biosynthesis, improves the rate of photosynthesis, and inhibits interveinal chlorosis. Many authors previously stated that zinc organizes hormones, such as gibberellins, cytokinins, and auxins, which are necessary for growth and differentiation of the plant cells. It induces plant growth as well as the accumulation of fresh and dry weight by preserving the balance between these hormones (Safarzadeh et al. 2013). Additionally, it is fundamental for plant physiology, where it helps the organization of auxin content, reducing the oxidation process, and improving enzymatic reactions, such as carbohydrate transfer and cellulose formation (Bhalerao et al. 2014). Through boosting chlorophyll levels, Zn contributes to higher photosynthetic activity, which ultimately promotes better crop growth and increased yields (Yu et al. 2015). Additionally, zinc is important for aiding in cell division and preserving the integrity of membrane structures (Lacerda et al. 2018) and synthesizing photosynthetic pigments (Liu et al. 2022). Zinc is important in the synthesis of proteins, chlorophyll, and various enzymes (Singh et al. 2018). It supports hormone organization, including the synthesis of tryptophan, and it facilitates signaling through mitogen-activated protein kinases (Kaur and Garg 2021), activates enzymes, and maintains ion balance (Alsafran et al. 2022). PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9788 Therefore, the present study has been performed to investigate the role of some biostimulants alone or combined with zinc and boron oxides to improve the productivity of date palm cv. Barhi and reduce the dependency on mineral fertilizers. EXPERIMENTAL Applied Treatments, Location, and Experimental Design The present study was performed during the 2023 and 2024 seasons on ten-year- old date palm trees cv. Barhi grown in the Wadi El-Natroun region, El-Behera governorate, Egypt, at the age of 12 years in sandy soil at a distance of 7 × 7 m2 under a drip irrigation system. Forty-five palms in the same growth and size were selected carefully to perform this study. The trees were sprayed with 50 mg/L ZnO + 50 mg/L B2O3; 100 mg/L ZnO + 100 mg/L B2O3; 0.2 and 0.4% YE; 0.2 and 0.4% Seaweed Extract (SWE); 50 mg/L ZnO + 50 mg/L B2O3 + 0.2 % YE + 0.2 % SWE, (combination 1); 0.4% YE + 0.4% SWE + 100 mg/L ZnO + 100 mg/L B2O3 (combination 2) as compared to trees that were not sprayed as a control. Yeast Extract (YE): Nutritional Additive Organic Pure Powder Yeast Extract Powder (Hangzhou Natur Foods Co., Ltd., Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China). Seaweed Extract (SWE): Plant Extract Ascophyllum Nodosum Flake/Powder Water Soluble Seaweed Extract Organic Fertilizer (Shenyang Everest Corporation Ltd., Shenyang, Liaoning, China). The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD), where each treatment was applied on five palms (five replicates). The trees were sprayed four times: starting from mid-February with one-month intervals between sprays. The analysis of the experimental soil is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Physical and Chemical Characteristics of the Experimental Soil Textural class O.M (%) pH CaCO3 (%) EC (dS/m) Sandy loam 0.25 8.3 5.8 2.8 Soluble anions (meq/L) Soluble cations (meq/L) Available nutrients (mg/kg) Macro nutrients Micronutrients HCO3 - CL- SO4 -- Ca++ Mg++ Na+ K+ N P K Fe Zn Mn 6.12 5.5 16.91 19.22 4.50 1.66 4.42 75.5 5.2 230 0.9 0.38 0.85 O.M.: Organic matter; EC: Electrical conductance Table 2. Weather Data during the 2023 and 2024 Seasons Year 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 Months Temperature (°C) Temperature (°C) Average Relative Humidity (%) Total Precipitation (mm) Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum January 9.21 20.31 9.26 19.46 70.27 64.46 26.70 26.20 February 7.75 18.91 8.73 20.54 68.94 69.41 29.90 6.70 March 11.14 24.42 10.46 24.04 59.23 62.43 14.20 8.80 April 12.96 27.79 14.01 29.94 54.04 57.87 10.20 2.20 May 16.05 31.75 16.80 32.44 52.39 48.06 0.40 0.00 June 20.11 35.29 20.94 38.67 52.70 50.40 1.90 0.20 July 22.11 38.48 22.98 38.03 54.11 53.71 0.00 0.00 August 22.65 37.37 22.75 37.71 55.20 55.06 0.00 1.50 September 22.28 36.39 22.08 35.17 54.88 56.40 0.20 0.00 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9789 The impact of the aforementioned treatments was evaluated by examining their effects on the subsequent parameters. Palm Yield At harvest, palm yield was measured in kg by weighing the weight of bunches, and the total yield per hectare was calculated by multiplying the number of palms by their average yield. Fruit Quality Forty fruits from each tree (replicate), were picked in September (time of the fruit ripening) of 2023 and 2024 and transferred directly to the lab to measure the fruits’ physical and chemical characteristics. Fruit Physical Characteristics Average fruit weight (g) was determined by calculating the mean weight of 40 individual fruits. Flesh weight (g), and seed weight (g), were measured, and the flesh/fruit ratio was calculated. Fruit length and fruit width (cm) were assessed using a digital vernier caliper (Suzhou Sunrix Precision Tools Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). Fruit firmness (Ib/inch2) was assessed using a Magness–Taylor pressure tester (mod. FT 02 (0 to 2 lb, Alfonsine, Italy). Fruit Chemical Characteristics Total soluble solids percentage in fresh fruits was determined using a hand refractometer (ATAGO Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Fruit acidity was determined as a percentage based on malic acid content and measured in the fruit juice through titration using 0.1 N sodium hydroxide, with phenolphthalein serving as the indicator (AOAC 2005). Total sugar content (%) was measured using the phenol-sulfuric acid method, while reducing sugars were colorimetrically determined following the procedure described by Nelson (2010). The percentage of non-reducing sugars was calculated by subtracting reducing sugars from total sugars. The content of ascorbic acid in the juice (vitamin C) was determined through titration using 2,6-dichloro phenol-indo-phenol (Nielsen 2017). The soluble tannin content was determined using a method as described by Ogawa and Yazaki (2018). Total chlorophyll content was estimated following the method described by Richardson et al. (2002), with absorbance measured spectrophotometrically at 650 nm. Similarly, fruit carotene content was determined using the procedure outlined by Aquino et al. (2018), with absorbance recorded at 440 nm using a spectrophotometer (Zhengzhou Resound Photoelectric Technology Research Institute Company, China). Statistical Analysis The results were statistically analyzed using One-Way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in a randomized complete block design (RCBD), and Least Significant Difference (LSD) at 0.05 was used compare between the means of the treatments (Snedecor and Cochran 1990) using CoHort Software 6.311 (Pacific Grove, CA, USA). https://chhgcltd.en.made-in-china.com/360-Virtual-Tour.html https://chhgcltd.en.made-in-china.com/360-Virtual-Tour.html PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9790 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The external spraying of ZnO + 50 mg/L B2O3, YE, SWE, and their combinations significantly improved the bunch weight, yield in kg per palm, and tons per hectare compared to unsprayed trees (Table 3). Moreover, the best treatment that achieved the most significant increments in the yield was the spraying of combination 2 over the other applied treatments. The highest doses from the sprayed materials were more effective than the lower ones. Additionally, the effect of SWE was higher than the influence of YE. The differences between the influence of 0.4% SWE and combination 1 were insignificant in the two seasons. Table 3. Influence of the Foliar Spraying of ZnO + B2O3, YE, SWE, and their Combinations on the Bunch Weight and Fruit Yield of Date Palm cv. Barhi during 2023 and 2024 Seasons Treatments Bunch Weight (kg) Yield (kg/palm) Yield (ton/h) 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 Control 15.88f 16.12f 158.80f 161.20f 30.97f 31.43f 50 mg/L ZnO + 50 mg/L B2O3 16.42ef 16.96def 164.20ef 169.60def 32.02ef 33.07def 100 mg/L ZnO + 100 mg/L B2O3 18.84bc 19.12c 188.4bc 191.20c 36.74bc 37.28c 0.2% YE 16.00f 16.52ef 160.00f 165.20ef 31.20f 32.21ef 0.4% YE 17.90cd 18.10cd 179.00cd 181.00cd 34.90cd 35.29cd 0.2% SWE 17.26de 17.80de 172.60de 178.00de 33.66de 34.71de 0.4% SWE 19.62b 20.4b 196.2b 204.00b 38.26b 39.78b Combination 1 19.96b 20.68b 199.60b 206.80b 38.92b 40.33b Combination 2 21.76a 22.12a 217.60a 221.20a 42.43a 43.13a LSD0.05 1.08 1.25 10.84 12.55 2.11 2.45 Treatments with the same letter in a column are not significantly different. The spraying of B2O3 + ZnO, YE, SWE, and their combinations had a positive effect on fruit weight, fruit firmness, and flesh weight, in Barhi date palms (Table 4). The results also showed that combination 2 yielded the best result, with the highest increments in the measured parameters. Additionally, the spraying of high concentrations of B2O3 + ZnO, YE, and SWE was more effective than the lowest concentrations in both seasons. The seed weight was markedly increased with combination 2 compared to control. The differences between the effects of combination 1, 0.4% SWE, 0.2 SWE, and 0.4 YE on the seed weight were so slight to be significant. The spraying of ZnO + B2O3, YE, SWE, and their combinations improved the fruit physical characteristics in terms of flesh-fruit weight, fruit length, and diameter compared to the control (Table 5). The highest fruit length was greatly increased by the spraying of combination 2 rather than the sprayed treatments. There were no significant differences detected between combination 2 and combination 1 on the flesh-fruit ratio and fruit diameter. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9791 Table 4. Influence of the Foliar Spraying of ZnO + B2O3, YE, SWE, and their Combinations on the Weights of Fruit, Flesh, and Seed and Fruit Firmness of Date Palm cv. Barhi during 2023 and 2024 Seasons Treatments Fruit Weight (g) Flesh Weight (g) Seed Weight (g) Fruit Firmness (Ib/inch2) 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 Control 15.1e 15.058f 13.80e 13.78e 1.30b 1.32d 18.77e 19.57e 50 mg/L ZnO + 50 mg/L B2O3 16.872d 16.31de 15.48d 14.91de 1.39a 1.388bc 21.30d 21.1d 100 mg/L ZnO + 100 mg/L B2O3 18.666c 18.836c 17.24c 17.494c 1.43a 1.402bc 21.77cd 22.33c 0.2% YE 15.678e 15.73ef 14.37e 14.394e 1.30b 1.35cd 19.23e 20.17e 0.4% YE 18.274c 18.498c 16.85c 17.166c 1.42a 1.402bc 21.23d 22.27c 0.2% SWE 17.078d 17.248d 15.65d 15.842d 1.43a 1.396bc 21.20d 21.23d 0.4% SWE 19.998b 20.392b 18.55b 19.068b 1.45a 1.43ab 22.47bc 22.73c Combination 1 20.862b 21.258b 19.42b 19.848b 1.44a 1.43ab 22.70b 23.87b Combination 2 22.00a 22.47a 20.56a 21.08a 1.44a 1.48a 23.53a 25.53a LSD0.05 1.00 1.17 1.00 1.21 0.07 0.06 0.79 0.92 Treatments with the same letter in a column are not significantly different. Table 5. Influence of the Foliar Spraying of ZnO + B2O3, YE, SWE, and their Combinations on the Flesh-fruit Ratio, Fruit Length, and Diameter of Date Palm cv. Barhi during 2023 and 2024 Seasons Treatments Flesh-fruit Ratio Fruit Length (cm) Fruit Diameter (cm) 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 Control 91.40f 91.21e 3.29f 3.30e 2.46b 2.41b 50 mg/L ZnO + 50 mg/L B2O3 91.73def 91.47e 3.47e 3.41d 2.59ab 2.51b 100 mg/L ZnO + 100 mg/L B2O3 92.32cd 92.54bcd 3.62bc 3.58c 2.46b 2.55b 0.2% YE 91.67ef 91.39e 3.45e 3.39d 2.48b 2.42b 0.4% YE 92.22cde 92.40cd 3.47de 3.46d 2.53b 2.52b 0.2% SWE 91.61ef 91.84de 3.48de 3.44d 2.48b 2.53b 0.4% SWE 92.75bc 92.97abc 3.59cd 3.57c 2.454b 2.54b Combination 1 93.08ab 93.27ab 3.72b 3.80b 2.61ab 2.57b Combination 2 93.44a 93.41a 3.86a 3.91a 2.77a 2.77a LSD0.05 0.56 0.76 0.11 0.08 0.22 0.17 Treatments with the same letter in a column are not significantly different. The fruit content from TSS percentage was improved by the external spraying of ZnO + B2O3, YE, SWE, and their combinations as compared to untreated trees (Table 6). Moreover, the results showed that the highest increments in TSS percentage were obtained with the spraying of combination 2 rather than the sprayed treatments in both seasons. The results also showed that there are no significant differences between the effect of combination 1, and 0.4% SWE in their effect. On the opposite side, the results indicate that the spraying of combination 2 markedly decreased the fruit content of acidity and tannin. Additionally, Combination 1, 0.4% SWE, 0.2% SWE, 0.4% YE, and 100 mg/L ZnO + 100 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9792 mg/L B2O3 positively lowered the fruit content from acidity and tannin percentages compared to untreated trees. Table 6. Influence of the Foliar Spraying of ZnO + B2O3, YE, SWE, and their Combinations on the Fruit Content from TSS, Acidity, and Tannin Percentages of Date Palm cv. Barhi During 2023 and 2024 Seasons Treatments TSS (%) Acidity (%) Tannin (%) 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 Control 25.70f 27.24e 0.34a 0.32a 1.06a 0.954a 50 mg/L ZnO + 50 mg/L B2O3 27.94e 28.50e 0.32ab 0.304ab 0.93b 0.854b 100 mg/L ZnO + 100 mg/L B2O3 32.46c 34.40bc 0.29c 0.258d 0.69d 0.7306c 0.2% YE 26.70ef 27.64e 0.34a 0.318a 0.94b 0.9098a 0.4% YE 32.60c 34.30c 0.29bc 0.27cd 0.72d 0.696cd 0.2% SWE 30.16d 31.40d 0.30bc 0.286bc 0.83c 0.804b 0.4% SWE 33.94bc 34.90bc 0.27c 0.25d 0.68d 0.6744d Combination 1 35.12b 36.00b 0.27c 0.25d 0.66d 0.608e Combination 2 37.38a 37.88a 0.23d 0.22e 0.57e 0.5448f LSD0.05 1.45 1.57 0.03 0.02 0.08 0.05 Treatments with the same letter in a column are not significantly different. The external spraying of ZnO + B2O3, YE, SWE, and their combinations greatly increased the fruit content from total, reduced, and non-reduced sugars compared to untreated trees in the two seasons (Table 7). The spraying of combination 2 remarkably increased the fruit content of total, reduced, and non-reduced sugars, rather than the other sprayed treatments. Moreover, the highest concentrations of ZnO + B2O3, YE, and SWE were more effective than the lowest ones in the two seasons. Table 7. Influence of the Foliar Spraying of ZnO + B2O3, YE, SWE, and their Combinations on the Fruit Content from Total, Reduced, and Non-reduced Sugars Percentages of Date Palm cv. Barhi during the 2023 and 2024 Seasons Treatments Total Sugars (%) Reduced Sugars (%) Non-reduced Sugars (%) 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 Control 21.74f 22.36d 16.56f 17.52f 5.18d 4.84abc 50 mg/L ZnO + 50 mg/L B2O3 23.72e 23.77d 18.30e 19.31e 5.42d 4.46c 100 mg/L ZnO + 100 mg/L B2O3 29.25c 29.21b 23.94b 24.24bc 5.31d 4.97abc 0.2% YE 22.70ef 22.91d 17.36ef 18.18ef 5.35d 4.73bc 0.4% YE 28.70c 29.41b 22.59c 23.97c 6.11bc 5.43a 0.2% SWE 26.15d 26.17c 20.50d 21.12d 5.65bcd 5.05abc 0.4% SWE 30.09bc 30.14b 24.57b 24.74bc 5.52cd 5.40a Combination 1 31.22b 30.78b 24.96b 25.52b 6.26ab 5.25ab Combination 2 33.58a 32.43a 26.78a 26.94a 6.80a 5.48a LSD0.05 1.61 1.54 1.34 1.40 0.58 0.59 Treatments with the same letter in a column are not significantly different. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9793 The spraying of date palm cv. Barhi by ZnO + B2O3, YE, and SWE improved fruit chemical characteristics like carotene, total chlorophyll, and vitamin C compared to untreated trees (Table 8). Moreover, the highest results were obtained by spraying the date palm trees with combination 2, which was the best treatment. Additionally, the differences between the effect of combination 1 and 0.4% SWE were so slight not enough to be significant. The effect of the application of 0.4 % SWE or YE was higher than the spraying of 0.2 % SWE or YE, and the impact of 100 mg/L from ZnO + B2O3 was higher than 50 mg/L. Table 8. Influence of the Foliar Spraying of ZnO + B2O3, YE, SWE, and their Combinations on the Fruit Content of Carotene, Total Chlorophyll, and Vitamin C of Date Palm cv. Barhi during the 2023 and 2024 Seasons Treatments Carotene (mg/100 g) Total Chlorophyll (mg/100 g) Vitamin C (mg/100 mL) 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 Control 3.30f 3.23f 4.83d 5.30f 3.36e 3.35e 50 mg/L ZnO + 50 mg/L B2O3 3.60ef 3.47f 5.30d 5.68ef 3.68d 3.48e 100 mg/L ZnO + 100 mg/L B2O3 4.27cd 4.70cd 6.16c 7.12d 3.98c 4.10c 0.2% YE 3.40ef 3.40f 5.20d 5.48f 3.49de 3.44e 0.4% YE 4.17d 4.50d 6.02c 6.18e 3.73d 3.91d 0.2% SWE 3.63e 4.03e 6.01c 5.79ef 3.65d 3.82d 0.4% SWE 4.53bc 4.83bc 6.63c 7.94c 4.22bc 4.15c Combination 1 4.80b 5.10b 7.64b 8.56b 4.31b 4.36b Combination 2 5.61a 5.63a 9.10a 9.12a 4.89a 5.00a LSD0.05 0.30 0.31 0.59 0.52 0.24 0.13 Treatments with the same letter in a column are not significantly different. Discussion The results showed the positive influence of the application of SWE individually or combined with YE, ZnO + B2O3 on the performance of date palm cv. Barhi. These findings were explained by many authors in their studies. For example, many authors reported that SWE is a natural marine resource and characterized by its high content of variant biologically active substances, such as polysaccharides and hormones, gibberellins, auxins, cytokinins, abscisic acid, sterols, indole acetic acid, and polyamines, which can improve the growth, development of the plants, flowering rate, productivity, the nutritional content and fruit shelf life, and defense abiotic stresses (Górka et al. 2015; Ali et al. 2021). SWE increases the efficiency of water use and nutrient uptake (Raj et al. 2018). SWEs are widely recognized as a nutrient-rich resource of Ca, Mg, K, S, and P, as well as micronutrients, such as iodine, manganese, nickel, selenium, iron, cobalt, zinc, copper, molybdenum, and boron, a valuable source of vitamins A, D, B1, B2, B9, B12, K, C, and E, amino acids, such as aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and alanine, proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, as well as bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols with antioxidants. Therefore, they are utilized in agriculture as liquid fertilizers, promoting higher crop yields (Kumawat and Kumawat 2023; Kumar et al. 2024). The present results agreed with those obtained by many authors who reported that the soil addition of SWE at 3 and 4 g/L improved the vegetative growth, productivity, fruit PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9794 quality, and the nutritional status of guava trees (Mosa et al. 2021). The spraying of SWE ameliorated the vegetative growth parameters, fruit set percentages, fruit productivity, fruit quality characteristics, and the nutritional status of the trees, compared to non-sprayed trees in apple (Mosa et al. 2022), olive, and apricot (Al-Saif et al. 2023a and b) and orange (Almutairi et al. 2024). As YE contains phytohormones and amino acids, its application can induce tolerance to environmental stress, promote plant growth and chlorophyll content in plants, and increase protein and nucleic acid synthesis (Wanas 2006). YE is a natural source of cytokinins that increases cell division and induces the synthesis of proteins and chlorophyll. Besides, YE was used as a growth enhancer due to its rich composition of both micro- and macronutrients, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, magnesium, iron, and sodium, plant growth regulators including gibberellins and auxins, amino acids, proteins, vitamins, and other essential compounds, all of which positively affect carbohydrate metabolism, photo- synthetic pigment levels, and enzyme activity, thereby promoting better plant growth and development (Lonhienne et al. 2014; Mukherjee et al. 2020), improve the biosynthesis of chlorophyll and raise nitrogen content, leading to improved levels of assimilation and the accumulation of organic matter (Saad-Allah et al. 2017). These findings are consistent with those reported by several other authors who reported that spraying YE improved the vegetative growth parameters, productivity, fruit quality, leaf composition from nutrients; meanwhile, it markedly lowered the fruit drop and fruit acidity percentages in mango (Abd El-Motty et al. 2010), orange (El-Shazly and Mustafa 2015), olive (Mahmoud et al. 2015), apricot (Haggag et al. 2016), mandarin (Ahmed et al. 2018), and pear (Hafez et al. 2018). Spraying pomegranate with YE at 0.2%, 0.3% and 0.4% remarkably improved vegetative growth, fruit set percentage, fruit number, weight, size, dimensions, and firmness, productivity, fruit chemical properties from soluble solids, total and reducing sugars, anthocyanin, leaf nutritional composition from macronutrients in the two seasons. Meanwhile, these treatments reduced the percentages of drop, cracking, sunburn, and total acidity of fruits (Harhash et al. 2021). Similarly, in another study performed on Jujube trees, the external spraying of 1% and 2% YE markedly ameliorated the productivity, physical and chemical fruit characteristics and markedly minimized the fruit acidity percentages (Ahmed et al. 2023). The external application of 0.2% YE on date palm remarkably increased productivity, fruit weight, firmness, size, dimensions, as well as fruit content from soluble solids, total, reduced and non-reduced sugars, ascorbic acid, and carotene, while it decreased the fruit acidity (Al-Saif et al. 2023c). The positive effect of boron may be because it enhances rates of pollen germination, pollen tube development, and fruit set percentages. In addition, it influences nucleic acids and plant hormones. Additionally, it promotes enzyme activity, boosts phytohormones and nucleic acid production, enhances nutrient uptake, and helps plants tolerate salinity. Besides, it increases carbohydrate and sugar translocation, stimulates phenol metabolism, and ultimately lowers fruit drop percentages and improves productivity (Marschner 2011; Ahmad et al. 2012). Besides, it is a fundamental nutrient for increasing the percentage of flowers, fruit set and yield, activation of plant hormones, cell wall synthesis, and cell membrane integrity (Davarpanah et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2023). The positive influence of boron is attributed to its vital roles in enhancing the respiration rate, protein metabolism, and the synthesis and metabolism of auxins, such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and phenols (Khalaj et al. 2016). It is also vital for raising the pollen grains’ viability and pollen tube development (Naeem et al. 2020), improving blooming rate, raising the nitrogen absorption PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9795 rate, the amount of water, and carrying phytohormones more easily, leading to improved cell division and elongation (Taiz et al. 2023). The spraying of B2O3 markedly improved the vegetative growth attributes, fruit set percentages, productivity, fruit quality in terms of fruit weight, size, length, and diameter as well as fruit content from soluble solids such as sugars. It was noticed that B2O3 remarkably reduced the fruit acidity and fruit drop percentages in apple (Mosa et al. 2015) and in sweet cherry (Sajid et al. 2024). The external application of strawberries with borax at 0.6% markedly increased the fruit set and fruit retention percentages, fruit weight, pulp weights, total sugar, TSS, and fruit productivity. However, it reduced the fruit drop percentage (Tiwari et al. 2023). Zinc is an essential micronutrient for plants because it is involved in the metabolism of starch and nucleic acids, and the biosynthesis of protein, the transfer of carbohydrate, the activity of various enzymes, such as RNA and DNA polymerases, and it plays a role in maintaining membrane structure and improving the photosynthesis process (Ojeda-Barrios et al. 2014; Valizadeh and Milic 2016). Besides, it is necessary for plant growth and development by participating in numerous physiological and enzymatic activities. It acts as a component, catalyst, or structural cofactor of enzymes involved in energy generation, macromolecule metabolism, and chlorophyll formation, enhancing root growth, regulating water absorption and transport, and protecting plants against abiotic stresses. Zinc is also essential for the synthesis of necessary plant hormones such as auxins, gibberellins and cytokinins (Szöllösi et al. 2020). Besides, zinc application enhances the absorption of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulfur, and magnesium (Islam et al. 2018), stimulates the production of tryptophan and auxins, supports pollen tube development, and promotes higher fruit set (Fei et al. 2016). Zn affects the growth of fruit as it is a precursor of tryptophan, which is required for the biosynthesis of indole acetic acid therefore it helps in division and elongation of cells, which can help to ameliorate productivity (Faizan et al. 2020). Spraying of orange with ZnO at 75 ppm increased shoot length, leaf area, fruit productivity, number, weight and volume of fruit, the fruit content from total chlorophyll, sugars, free amino acids, soluble phenols and tryptophan compared with the control. Additionally, zinc also significantly increased the concentration of GA3, IAA, and ABA, and leaf mineral composition from P, K, N, Mg, Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn (Ahmed et al. 2012). The external application of ZnO on apple at 100, 200, and 300 mg/L improved total chlorophyll, fruit set %, yields, fruit weight, size, dimensions, firmness, and fruit content from soluble solids. Meanwhile, these treatments significantly reduced the fruit drop percentages and fruit acidity (Aly et al. 2022). The combined application of Zn and B enhanced the biosynthesis of chlorophyll a and b, total chlorophyll content, and carotenoids, along with leaf area expansion, resulting in increased nut yield in the ‘Bhaskara’ cashew variety (Lakshmipathi et al. 2018). The external application of 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.4% borax on Kagzi lime trees markedly increased the fruit set %, fruit number, and productivity; meanwhile, this treatment notably reduced the fruit drop percentage compared with untreated trees (Venu and Delvadia 2018). CONCLUSIONS 1. The results indicate that spraying ZnO + B2O3, yeast extract (YE), and seaweed extract (SWE) improved both fruit productivity and quality in Barhi date palms compared to the control. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9796 2. The combined application proved more effective than individual treatments, with the best results in yield and fruit quality achieved using combination 2, rather than other treatments. 3. The application of YE and SWE as biostimulants on date palm demonstrates clear potential for improving plant vigor, growth, and productivity. Generally, integrating yeast and seaweed extracts into date palm management programs can support sustainable agriculture by reducing dependence on synthetic fertilizers, enhancing soil fertility, and promoting healthier, more resilient trees. Future studies should focus on optimizing dosage, application frequency, and the combined use of these biostimulants to maximize yield and fruit quality in date palm cultivation. Funding This research was funded by Ongoing Research Funding program, (ORF-2025- 561), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors extend their appreciation to Ongoing Research Funding program, (ORF-2025-561), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. REFERENCES CITED Abd El-Motty, E. Z. A., Shahin, M. F. M., El-Shiekh, M. H. and El-Abd- Migeed, M. M. M. (2010). “Effect of algae extract and yeast application on growth, nutritional status, yield and fruit quality of Keitte mango trees,” Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 1(3), 421-429. Abd-Alrahman, H. A., and Aboud, F. S. (2021). “Response of sweet pepper plants to foliar application of compost tea and dry yeast under soilless conditions,” Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 45(119), 1-9. DOI: 10.1186/s42269-021-00578-y Ahmad, W., Zia, M. H., Malhi, S. S., Niaz, A., and Ullah, S. (2012). “Boron deficiency in soils and crops: A review,” Crop. Plant. 65-97. Ahmed, A. A. A., Talib, Z. A., bin Hussein, M. Z., and Zakaria, A. (2012). “Improve- ment of the crystallinity and photocatalytic property of zinc oxide as calcination product of Zn–Al layered double hydroxide,” J. Alloys Compounds 539, 154-160. Ahmed, F. F., Abdel aal, A. H., Mohamed, A. A. E., and Shoug, M. A. (2018). “Behaviour of balady mandarin trees to some yeast, amino acid and salicylic acid treatments,” New York J. Sci. 11(3), 9-19. Ahmed, M. A. A., Alebidi, A., Al-Obeed, R., and Omar, A. (2023). “Effect of foliar spray of yeast extract and potassium nitrate on yield and fruit quality on Ziziphus jujuba L. trees,” Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus. 22(1), 3-10. Al-Alawi, R. A., Al-Mashiqri, J. H., Al-Nadabi, J. S., Al-Shihi, B. I., and Baqi, Y. (2017). “Date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.): Natural products and therapeutic options,” Front. Plant Sci. 8, article 845. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00845 Ali, O., Ramsubhag, A., and Jayaraman, J. (2021). “Biostimulant properties of seaweed extracts in plants: Implications towards sustainable crop production,” Plants 10, 531. DOI: 10.3390/plants10030531 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9797 Aljaloud, S., Colleran, H. L., and Ibrahim, S. A. (2020). “Nutritional value of date fruits and potential use in nutritional bars for athletes,” Food Nutr. Sci. 11(06), article 463. DOI: 10.4236/fns.2020.116034 Almutairi, K. F., Sas-Paszt, L., and Mosa, W. F. (2024). “The role of some biostimulants in improving the productivity of orange,” Sustainability 16(16), article 7131. DOI: 10.3390/su16167131 Alsafran, M., Usman, K., Ahmed, B., Rizwan, M., Saleem, M. H., and Al Jabri, H. (2022). “Understanding the phytoremediation mechanisms of potentially toxic elements: A proteomic overview of recent advances,” Front. Plant Sci. 13, article 881242. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.881242 Al-Saif, A. M., Sas-Paszt, L., Awad, R. M., and Mosa, W. F. (2023a). “Apricot (Prunus armeniaca) performance under foliar application of humic acid, brassinosteroids, and seaweed extract,” Horticulturae 9(4), article 519. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae9040519 Al-Saif, A. M., Ali, M. M., Ben Hifaa, A. B., and Mosa, W. F. (2023b). “Influence of spraying some biostimulants on yield, fruit quality, oil fruit content and nutritional status of olive (Olea europaea L.) under salinity,” Horticulturae 9(7), article 825. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae9070825 Al-Saif, A. M., Sas-Paszt, L., Saad, R. M., Abada, H. S., Ayoub, A., and Mosa, W. F. (2023c). “Biostimulants and nano-potassium on the yield and fruit quality of date palm,” Horticulturae 9(10), article 1137. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae9101137 Aly, M.A.M., Muhsin, A.T., Abdelsalam, N. R. and Mosa. W.F. (2022). “Effect of some nano fertilizers on yield and fruit quality of apple,” Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci., H Botany 13(2), 59-64. AOAC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis, 18th Ed., W. Hortwitz, and G. W. Latimer (eds.), Association of Official Analytical Chemists-International AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, pp. 20877-2417. Aquino, C. F., Salomão, L. C. C., Pinheiro-Sant’ana, H. M., Ribeiro, S. M. R., Siqueira, D. L. D., and Cecon, P. R. (2018). “Carotenoids in the pulp and peel of bananas from 15 cultivars in two ripening stages,” Rev. Ceres. 65, 217-226. DOI: 10.1590/0034- 737X201865030001 Battacharyya, D., Babgohari, M. Z., Rathor, P., and Prithiviraj, B. (2015). “Seaweed extracts as biostimulants in horticulture,” Sci. Hortic. 196, 39-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.012 Begum, M., Bordoloi, B. C., Singha, D. D., and Ojha, N. J. (2018). “Role of seaweed extract on growth, yield and quality of some agricultural crops: A review,” Agric. Rev. 39(4), 321-326. DOI: 10.18805/ag.R-1838 Benson, T., Lavelle, F., Bucher, T., McCloat, A., Mooney, E., Egan, B., Collins, C. E., and Dean, M. (2018). “The impact of nutrition and health claims on consumer perceptions and portion size selection: Results from a nationally representative survey,” Nutr. 10(5), article 656. DOI: 10.3390/nu10050656 Bentrad, N., and Hamida-Ferhat, A. (2020). “Date palm fruit (Phoenix dactylifera): Nutritional values and potential benefits on health,” in: The Mediterranean Diet, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 239-255. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0- 12-818649-7.00022-9 Bhalerao, P. P., Patel, B. N., Patil, S. J., and Gaikwad, S. S. (2014). “Effect of foliar application of Ca, Zn, Fe and B on growth, yield and quality of papaya (Carica papaya) cv. Taiwan Red Lady,” Curr. Hortic. 2(2), 35-39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.881242 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.012 http://dx.doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-1838 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9798 Botelho, R. V., Müller, M. M. L., Umburanas, R. C., Laconski, J. M. O., and Terra, M. M. (2022). “Boron in fruit crops: plant physiology, deficiency, toxicity, and sources for fertilization,” in: Boron in Plants and Agriculture, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 29-50. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90857-3.00015-1 Brdar-Jokanović, M. (2020). “Boron toxicity and deficiency in agricultural plants,” Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(4), article 1424. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041424 Caradonia, F., Battaglia, V., Righi, L., Pascali, G., and La Torre, A. (2019). “Plant biostimulant regulatory framework: Prospects in Europe and current situation at international level,” J. Plant Growth Regul. 38, 438-448. DOI: 10.1007/s00344-018- 9853-4 Colavita, G., Spera, N., Blackhall, V., and Sepulveda, G. (2011). “Effect of seaweed extract on pear fruit quality and yield,” Acta Hortic., 601–607. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.909.72 Davarpanah, S., Tehranifar, A., Davarynejad, G., Abadía, J., and Khorasani, R. (2016). “Effects of foliar applications of zinc and boron nano-fertilizers on pomegranate (Punica granatum cv. Ardestani) fruit yield and quality,” Sci. Hortic. 210, 57-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.07.003 Dawood, M. G., Sadak, M. S., Abdallah, M. M. S., Bakry, B. A., and Darwish, O. M. (2019). “Influence of biofertilizers on growth and some biochemical aspects of flax cultivars grown under sandy soil conditions,” Bull. Nat. Res. Cent. 43(1), 1-13. DOI: 10.1186/s42269-019-0122-x El Boukhari, M. E. M., Barakate, M., Bouhia, Y., and Lyamlouli, K. (2020). “Trends in seaweed extract based biostimulants: Manufacturing process and beneficial effect on soil-plant systems,” Plants 9(3), article 359. DOI: 10.3390/plants9030359 El-Serafy, R. S. (2018). “Growth and productivity of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) as affected by yeast and humic acid,” Sci. J. Flowers Ornamen. Plants 5(2), 195-203. DOI: 10.21608/sjfop.2018.18129 EL-Shazly, S.M. and Mustafa, N.S. (2015). “Enhancement yield, fruit quality and nutritional status of Washington navel orange trees by application of some bio stimulants,” Acta Hortic. 1065(165), 1303-1309. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1065.165 Faizan, M., Faraz, A., and Hayat, S. (2020). “Effective use of zinc oxide nanoparticles through root dipping on the performance of growth, quality, photosynthesis and antioxidant system in tomato,” J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 29(3), 553-567. DOI: 10.1007/s13562-019-00525-z FAO. (2023). “FAO Statistical Databases,” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Available online: https: //www.fao.org/faostat/, Accessed 23 Aug 2023. Fei, X., Fu, X.-Z., Wang, N.-Q., Xi, J.-L., Huang, Y., Wei, Z., Ling, L.-L., and Peng, L.- Z. (2016). “Physiological changes and expression characteristics of ZIP family genes under zinc deficiency in navel orange (Citrus sinensis),” J. Integr. Agric. 15(4), 803- 811. DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61276-X Fu, S.-F., Sun, P.-F., Lu, H.-Y., Wei, J.-Y., Xiao, H.-S., Fang, W.-T., Cheng, B.-Y., and Chou, J.-Y. (2016). “Plant growth-promoting traits of yeasts isolated from the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of Drosera spatulata Lab,” Fungal Biol. 120(3), 433- 448. DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2015.12.006 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041424 https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/sjfop.2018.18129 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9799 Ghnimi, S., Umer, S., Karim, A., and Kamal-Eldin, A. (2017). “Date fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L.): An underutilized food seeking industrial valorization,” NFS J. 6, 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.nfs.2016.12.001 Górka, B., Lipok, J., and Wieczorek, P. P. (2015). “Biologically active organic compounds, especially plant promoters, in algae extracts and their potential application in plant cultivation,” in: Marine Algae Extracts: Processes, Products, Application, S.-K. Kim, and K. Chojnacka (eds.), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 659-680. DOI: 10.1002/9783527679577.ch37 Gullón, B., Gagaoua, M., Barba, F. J., Gullón, P., Zhang, W., and Lorenzo, J. M. (2020). “Seaweeds as promising resource of bioactive compounds: Overview of novel extraction strategies and design of tailored meat products,” Trends Food Sci. Technol. 100, 1-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.039 Hadi, A., and Saleh, S. (2021). “Response of apple trees (cv. Ibrahimi) to the time of foliar application with zinc and boron,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 904, article 012048. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/904/1/012048 Hafez, O.M., Hamouda, H., EL-Dahshouri, M. and EL-Saady, A. (2018). “Response of Le Conte pear trees to some nutrients, salicylic acid and yeast foliar application under newly reclaimed soil,” Middle East J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 8(1), 251-258. Haggag, L. F., Fawzi, M., Shahin, M., and EL-Hady, E. S. (2016). “Effect of yeast, humic acid, fulvic acid, citric acid, potassium citrate and some chelated micro-elements on yield, fruit quality and leaf minerals content of ‘Canino’ apricot trees,” Int. J. Chem. Technol. Res. 9(4), 07-15. Hamed, S. A., Zewail, R., Abdalrahman, H., Fekry, G. E.-A., Khaitov, B., and Park, K. W. (2019). “Promotion of growth, yield and fiber quality attributes of Egyptian cotton by bacillus strains in combination with mineral fertilizers,” J. Plant Nutr. 42(18), 2337-2348. DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2019.1655045 Harhash, M. M., Saad, R. M., and Mosa, W. F. A. (2021). “Response of "wonderful" pomegranate cultivar to the foliar application of some biostimulants,” Plant Archives (09725210), 21(2). https://cabidigitallibrary.org by 156.192.152.169, on 09/12/25. Hasanuzzaman, M., Fujita, M., Oku, H., Nahar, K., and Hawrylak-Nowak, B. (2018). Plant Nutrients and Abiotic Stress Tolerance, Springer, Singapore, pp. 269-295. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-9044-8 Hassan, N. M., Marzouk, N. M., Fawzy, Z. F., and Saleh, S. A. (2020). “Effect of bio- stimulants foliar applications on growth, yield, and product quality of two cassava cultivars,” Bull. Nat. Res. Cent. 44, 1-9. DOI: 10.1186/s42269-020-00317-9 Hernández-Herrera, R. M., Virgen-Calleros, G., Ruiz-López, M., Zañudo-Hernández, J., Délano-Frier, J. P., and Sánchez-Hernández, C. (2014). “Extracts from green and brown seaweeds protect tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) against the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria solani,” J. Appl. Phycol. 26, 1607-1614. DOI: 10.1007/s10811- 013-0193-2 Islam, M. M., Karim, M. R., Oliver, M. M. H., Urmi, T. A., Hossain, M. A., and Haque, M. M. (2018). “Impacts of trace element addition on lentil (Lens culinaris L.) agronomy,” Agronomy 8(7), article 100. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy8070100 Kalayu, G. (2019). “Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms: promising approach as biofertilizers,” Int. J. Agron. 253(129), 1-28. article 4917256. DOI: 10.1155/2019/4917256 Kaur, H., and Garg, N. (2021). “Zinc toxicity in plants: A review,” Planta 253(6), article 129. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-021-03642-z https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9044-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9044-8 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9800 Khalaj, K., Ahmadi, N., and Souri, M. K. (2016). “Improvement of postharvest quality of Asian pear fruits by foliar application of boron and calcium,” Horticulturae 3(1), article 15. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae3010015 Kumar, G., Nanda, S., Singh, S. K., Kumar, S., Singh, D., Singh, B. N., and Mukherjee, A. (2024). “Seaweed extracts: Enhancing plant resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses,” Front. Marine Sci. 11, article 1457500. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1457500 Kumawat, P., and Kumawat, V. (2023). “Seaweed marine algae: Nutritional values and plant growth regulators for sustainable agriculture,” Int. J. Environ. Agric. Res. 9(10), 21-26. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10054276 Lacerda, J. S., Martinez, H. E., Pedrosa, A. W., Clemente, J. M., Santos, R. H., Oliveira, G. L., and Jifon, J. L. (2018). “Importance of zinc for arabica coffee and its effects on the chemical composition of raw grain and beverage quality,” Crop Sci. 58(3), 1360- 1370. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2017.06.0373 Lakshmipathi, J., Adiga, D., Kalaivanan, B., Muralidhara, M., and Preethi, P. (2018). “Effect of zinc and boron application on leaf area, photosynthetic pigments, stomatal number and yield of cashew,” Intl. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7(1), 1786-1795. DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.216 Liu, L., Nian, H., and Lian, T. (2022). “Plants and rhizospheric environment: Affected by zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs). A review,” Plant Physiol. Biochem. 185, 91- 100. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.05.032 Lonhienne, T., Mason, M. G., Ragan, M. A., Hugenholtz, P., Schmidt, S., and Paungfoo‐ Lonhienne, C. (2014). “Yeast as a biofertilizer alters plant growth and morphology,” Crop Sci. 54(2), 785-790. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2013.07.0488 Mahmoud, T. S., Kassim, N. E., and Rayya, M. (2015). “Effect of foliar application with dry yeast extract and benzyl adenine on growth and yield of Manzanillo olive trees,” Res. J. Pharm., Biol. Chem. Sci. 6(2), 1573-1583. Marschner, H. (2011). Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. DOI: 10.1016/C2009-0-02402-7 Marzauk, N. M., Shafeek, M. R., Helmy, Y. I., Ahmed, A. A., and Shalaby, M. A. F. (2014). “Effect of vitamin E and yeast extract foliar application on growth, pod yield and both green pod and seed yield of broad bean (Vicia faba L.),” Middle East J. Appl. Sci. 4(1), 61-67. Mosa, W. F. A., Abd EL-Megeed, N. A., and Sas-Paszt L. (2015). “The effect of the foliar application of potassium, calcium, boron and humic acid on vegetative growth, fruit set, leaf mineral, yield and fruit quality of 'Anna' apple trees,” A. J. Exp. Agric. 8(4), 224-234. Mosa, W. F., Sas-Paszt, L., Głuszek, S., Górnik, K., Anjum, M. A., Saleh, A. A., Abada, H. S., and Awad, R. M. (2022). “Effect of some biostimulants on the vegetative growth, yield, fruit quality attributes and nutritional status of apple,” Horticulturae, 9(1), article 32. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae9010032 Mosa, W. F., Sas-Paszt, L., Gornik, K., Ali, H. M., and Salem, M. Z. (2021). “Vegetative growth, yield, and fruit quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. maamoura as affected by some biostimulants,” BioResources 16(4), article 7379. DOI: 10.15376/biores.16.4.7379-7399. Mukherjee, A., Verma, J. P., Gaurav, A. K., Chouhan, G. K., Patel, J. S., and Hesham, A. E.-L. (2020). “Yeast a potential bio-agent: Future for plant growth and postharvest disease management for sustainable agriculture,” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 104, 1497-1510. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-10321-3 https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3010015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.05.032 https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9010032 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9801 Murtic, S., Oljaca, R., Murtic, M. S., Vranac, A., Koleska, I., and Karic, L. (2018). “Effects of seaweed extract on the growth, yield and quality of cherry tomato under different growth conditions,” Acta Agric. Slov. 111(2), 315-325. DOI: 10.14720/aas.2018.111.2.07 Naeem, M., Ansari, A. A., and Gill, S. S. (2020). Contaminants in Agriculture: Sources, Impacts and Management, N. Gauri, A. A. Ansari, and S. S. Gill (eds.), Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-41552-5 Nielsen, S. S. (2010). “Phenol-sulfuric acid method for total carbohydrates,” in: Food Analysis Laboratory Manual, Food Science Texts Series, S. S. Nielsen (ed.), Springer, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 47-53. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1463-7_6 Nielsen, S. S. (2017). “Vitamin C determination by indophenol method,” in: Food Analysis Laboratory Manual, Food Science Texts Series, Springer, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 143-146. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44127-6_15 Nikoogoftar-Sedghi, M., Rabiei, V., Razavi, F., Molaei, S., and Khadivi, A. (2023). “The effect of foliar application of Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. seaweed extract on biochemical traits related to abiotic stresses in pistachio (Pistacia vera L. cv. Kaleh- Ghoochi),” BMC Plant Biol. 23(1), article 635. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-023-04654-5 Ogawa, S., and Yazaki, Y. (2018). “Tannins from Acacia mearnsii De Wild. Bark: Tannin determination and biological activities,” Mol. 23(4), article 837. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23040837 Ojeda-Barrios, D. L., Perea-Portillo, E., Hernández-Rodríguez, O. A., Avila-Quezada, G., Abadía, J., and Lombardini, L. (2014). “Foliar fertilization with zinc in pecan trees,” HortSci. 49(5), 562-566. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.49.5.562 Parthiban, C., Saranya, C., Girija, K., Hemalatha, A., Suresh, M., and Anantharaman, P. (2013). “Biochemical composition of some selected seaweeds from Tuticorin coast,” Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 4(3), 362-366. Patel, J. S., Selvaraj, V., Gunupuru, L. R., Rathor, P. K., and Prithiviraj, B. (2020). “Combined application of Ascophyllum nodosum extract and chitosan synergistically activates host-defense of peas against powdery mildew,” BMC Plant Biol. 20, 1-10. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-2287-8 Raj, T. S., Nishanthi, P., Graff, K. H., and Suji, H. A. (2018). “Seaweed extract as a biostimulant and a pathogen controlling agent in plants,” Int. J. Trop. Agric. 36(3), 563-580. Rerkasem, B., Jamjod, S., and Pusadee, T. (2020). “Productivity limiting impacts of boron deficiency, a review,” Plant Soil 455(1), 23-40. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-020-04676-0 Richardson, A. D., Duigan, S. P., and Berlyn, G. P. (2002). “An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content,” New Phytol. 153(1), 185-194. DOI: 10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00289.x Rouphael, Y. and Colla, G. (2020). “Biostimulants in Agriculture,” Front. Plant Sci. 11, article 40. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00040 Saad-Allah, K. M., Fetouh, M. I., and Elhaak, M. A. (2017). “Induction of milk thistle (Silybum marianum L. Gaertn) growth and phytochemicals production by natural stimulants,” J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants. 6, 101-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2017.02.006 Safarzadeh, S., Ronaghi, A., and Karimian, N. (2013). “Effect of cadmium toxicity on micronutrient concentration, uptake, and partitioning in seven rice cultivars,” Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 59(2), 231-245. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2011.622752 https://doi/ https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1463-7_6 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9802 Saini, H., Vijay, S., and Saini, P. (2019). “Differential responses of Fe, Zn, B, Cu and Mg on growth and quality attributes of fruit crops,” J. Pharmacog. Phytochem. 8(5), 01- 05. Sajid, M., Basit, A., Shah, S.T., Khan, A., Ullah, I., Bilal, M., Khan, M.S., and Khan,W. (2024). “Enhancing the quality and fruit yield of sweet cherry (Prunus Avium) cultivars by foliar application of boron,” Appl. Fruit Sci. 66(2), 485-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-01023-2 Sarhan, T., and Abdullah, O. K. (2010). “Effect of Azotobacter inoculation. Dry bread yeast suspension varying levels of urea on growth of potato cv. Desiree,” in: World Food System — A Contribution from Europe, Tropentag, Zurich, Switzerland. Shambhavi, S., Kumar, R., Sharma, S., Verma, G., Sharma, R., and Sharma, S. K. (2017). “Long-term effect of inorganic fertilizers and amendments on productivity and root dynamics under maize-wheat intensive cropping in an acid Alfisol,” J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 9(4), 2004 -2012. Sharafi, Y., and Raina, M. (2021). “Effect of boron on pollen attributes in different cultivars of Malus domestica L.,” Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 44(3), 189-194. DOI: 10.1007/s40009-020-00986-0 Singh, A., Singh, N. á., Afzal, S., Singh, T., and Hussain, I. (2018). “Zinc oxide nanoparticles: a review of their biological synthesis, antimicrobial activity, uptake, translocation and biotransformation in plants,” J. Mater. Sci. 53(1), 185-201. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-017-1544-1 Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. (1990). Statistical Methods, 6th Ed., Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA. Spinelli, F., Fiori, G., Noferini, M., Sprocatti, M., and Costa, G. (2009). “Perspectives on the use of a seaweed extract to moderate the negative effects of alternate bearing in apple trees,” J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 84, 131-137. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2009.11512610 Suhail, F. M. (2013). “Effect of mycorrhizal fungi inoculation and seaweed extract spray on some growth characters and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.),” J. Genet. Environ. Resour. 1, 209-214. Szöllösi, R., Molnár, Á., Kondak, S., and Kolbert, Z. (2020). “Dual effect of nanomaterials on germination and seedling growth: Stimulation vs. Phytotoxicity,” Plants 9(12), article 1745. DOI: 10.3390/plants9121745 Taiz, L., Møller, I. M., Murphy, A., and Zeiger, E. (2023). Plant Physiology and Development, Seventh Edition, Sinauer Associates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. DOI: 10.1093/hesc/9780197614204.001.0001 Tiwari, S., Gautam, R., Dwivedi, A., Pratap, R., Shukla, J. K., and Shukla, A. (2023). “Effect of foliar application of boron, zinc and gibberellic acid on fruit drop, fruit yield and quality parameter of Aonla cv. NA-7,” Int. J. Stat. Appl. Math. 8, 644-647. Valizadeh, M., and Milic, V. (2016). “The effects of balanced nutrient managements and nano-fertilizers effects on crop production in semi-arid areas,” Cur. Opin. Agric. 5, article 31. Venu, A., and Delvadia, D. V. (2018). “Effect of zinc, boron, and iron application on flowering and yield of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia L) cv. Kagzi Lime,” Int. J. Microbiol. Res. 10(4), 1164-1165. Wanas, A. (2006). “Response of squash plants grown in winter season to some natural extracts and antioxidants,” Ann. Agric. Sci., Moshtohor. 44(4), 1571-1591. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu Mosa et al. (2025). “Biostimulants & date palms,” BioResources 20(4), 9785-9803. 9803 Yu, J., Wang, M., Dong, C., Xie, B., Liu, G., Fu, Y., and Liu, H. (2015). “Analysis and evaluation of strawberry growth, photosynthetic characteristics, biomass yield and quality in an artificial closed ecosystem,” Sci. Hortic. 195, 188-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.009 Zhang, Q., Ackah, M., Wang, M., Amoako, F. K., Shi, Y., Wang, L., Dari, L., Li, J., Jin, X., and Jiang, Z. (2023). “The impact of boron nutrient supply in mulberry (Morus alba) response to metabolomics, enzyme activities, and physiological parameters,” Plant Physiol. Bioch. 200, article 107649. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107649 Zhao, H., Wu, L., Chai, T., Zhang, Y., Tan, J., and Ma, S. (2012). “The effects of copper, manganese, and zinc on plant growth and elemental accumulation in the manganese- hyperaccumulator Phytolacca americana,” J. Plant Physiol. 169(13), 1243-1252. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.04.016 Article submitted: August 6, 2025; Peer review completed: August 23, 2025; Revised version received: September 12, 2025; Accepted: September 15, 2025; Published: September 24, 2025. DOI: 10.15376/biores.20.4.9785-9803 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107649