Microsoft Word - 16-Bio_33292_resumo.doc 1572 Original Article Biosci. J., Uberlândia, v. 32, n. 6, p. 1572-1577, Nov./Dec. 2016 EFFICIENCY OF BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT FOR THE REMOVAL OF TOTAL AND THERMOTOLERANT COLIFORM BACTERIA FROM DOMESTIC SEWAGE EFICIÊNCIA DO TRATAMENTO BIOLÓGICO NA REMOÇÃO DE COLIFORMES TOTAIS E TERMOTOLERANTES EM ESGOTO HUMANO Paula Maria Pilotto BRANCO1; Ricardo Galbiatti Sandoval NOGUEIRA2; Lívia Maria Soares FERREIRA3; Luiz Augusto do AMARAL4; Jorge de LUCAS JÚNIOR5 1. Médica Veterinária, Doutoranda em Medicina Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias – FCAV, Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil. paulapilotto@hotmail.com; 2. Zootecnista, Doutorando em Zootecnia, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos – FZEA, Universidade de São Paulo - USP Pirassununga, SP, Brasil; 3. Zootecnista, Mestre em Zootecnia – FCAV – UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil; 4. Professor Adjunto, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Reprodução Animal – FCAV – UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil; 5. Professor Titular, Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola – FCAV - UNESP Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil. ABSTRACT: Researchers around the world have focused their efforts on devising combinations of technologies that are not only economically feasible but also effective in mitigating the impacts caused by wastes containing pathogens that pose potential risks to human and animal health. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a biological treatment system for removing total and thermotolerant coliform bacteria with a view to the possible organic recycling of domestic sewage. To this end, a tubular continuous flow anaerobic digester, with hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 25 days and an optional stabilization pond, were used to treat the sewage produced by 150 people in the municipality of Sertãozinho, SP, Brazil. The samples were collected weekly, always on the same day, at three different sampling points (inlet of the treatment system, the outlet of tubular digester, and the optional stabilization pond), totaling 108 samples. The MPN method was employed to determine the total coliform and thermotolerant coliform populations, using multiple series of three tubes (APHA, 2005). The system proved efficient in reducing the number of indicator bacteria of fecal contamination, showing a removal efficiency of 98.76% for total coliforms and of 99.29% for thermotolerant coliforms. However, a third treatment step involving polishing should be included to render the effluent suitable for use in fertigation or discharge into water bodies. KEYWORDS: Continuous flow anaerobic digester. Environmental sustainability. Indicator bacteria. Sewage. Stabilization pond. INTRODUCTION The inconvenience caused by waste from domestic sewage systems and the pathogenic potential of some microorganisms to human and animal health (MARIN et al., 2015) pose a serious problem in today’s context. To ensure environmental sustainability, many researchers have sought to devise combinations of efficient systems that can ensure human development while preserving the environment. The improper disposal of such effluents (whether human or animal) without any type of prior treatment may lead to the contamination of water, soil and air. The careless use of natural resources and the discharge of untreated sewage in open ditches and water bodies is still a reality in many parts of Brazil today. According to Colon et al. (2015), the transmission of pathogens by the fecal-oral route is the main factor responsible for the deaths of more than 50% of children in developing countries. Thus, in most cases, the pollution of freshwater sources is the main cause of waterborne diseases. Food and water contamination by fecal matter causes up to 2.5 billion cases of diarrhea in children every year, and kills 600,000 of them (BMGF, 2011). This paper proposes the use of a continuous flow anaerobic digestion system as a way to mitigate the environmental impacts resulting from the ineffective treatment or often the complete absence of proper treatment of human waste. This system has proved to be an attractive technology to treat animal wastes in developing countries (KINYUA et al., 2016), since it enables nutrients to be recycled, producing as byproducts biofertilizer, which can be used to replace mineral fertilizers, and biogas, a composition of gases, particularly CH4 and CO2, which can replace fossil fuels. In this study, a biological system consisting of a tubular continuous flow anaerobic digester and an optional stabilization pond for sewage treatment were tested to evaluate the system’s efficiency in reducing indicator bacteria of fecal contamination (total and thermotolerant coliforms) and the Received: 22/02/16 Accepted: 05/10/16 1573 Efficiency of biological treatment… BRANCO, P. M. P. et al. Biosci. J., Uberlândia, v. 32, n. 6, p. 1572-1577, Nov./Dec. 2016 feasibility of discarding the effluent into the ground or discharging it into water bodies. MATERIAL AND METHODS The experiment was conducted in the municipality of Sertãozinho, SP, Brazil, using a continuous flow anaerobic digester with a volume of 152 m3 and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 25 days, as well as an optional stabilization pond, to treat the domestic sewage produced by 150 people. Samples were collected weekly, always on the same day, at three different sampling points: at the inlet of the treatment system, the outlet of the digester, and in the stabilization pond, totaling 108 samples. The samples were collected in duplicate, as follows: Influent – raw sewage; Effluent – outlet of the digester; stabilization pond, and immediately sent to the Biomass Lab I of the São Paulo State University at Jaboticabal for microbiological testing within no more than 24 hours. Total and thermotolerant coliform populations were determined by the MPN (most probable number) method, using multiple series of three tubes (APHA, 2005). This involved a presumptive test in a culture of lauryl sulfate tryptose broth, and incubation at 35ºC for 24 to 48 h. The confirmatory test involved cultures in brilliant green bile broth, and incubation at 35ºC for 24 to 48 h for total coliforms, and in E.C. broth with incubation at 44.5ºC for 24 h for thermotolerant coliforms. A statistical analysis was performed by means of the Tukey test at a 5% level of significance. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION During the 18-week sampling period, the average bacterial population found in the influent was 1.82x108 MPN 100 mL-1 of total coliforms and 2.60x107 MPN 100 mL-1 of thermotolerant coliforms (Table 1). Souza et al. (2015) observed similar values for total and thermotolerant coliforms, i.e., 3.22x108 and 2.62x107 MPN 100 mL-1, respectively, during a one-year monitoring period of a domestic sewage treatment system. Table 1. Most probable number (MPN 100 mL-1) of total and thermotolerant coliforms in the influent and effluent of the digester, and removal rate (%) in the 18-week period. Week Total coliforms (MPN 100 mL-1) Thermotolerant coliforms (MPN 100 mL-1) Sampling point Removal rate (%) Sampling point Removal rate (%) Influent Effluent Influent Effluent 0 2.05x106 1.06x106 48.20 1.05x106 5.62x105 46.48 1 5.65x105 2.25x105 60.18 4.95x105 1.55x105 68.69 2 2.40x108 9.70x104 99.96 1.16x108 9.70x104 99.92 3 1.21x108 1.60x105 99.87 7.07x107 6.50x104 99.91 4 1.20x108 1.40x104 99.99 1.10x108 6.15x103 99.99 5 7.12x106 2.40x104 99.66 6.12x106 2.40x104 99.61 6 1.26x109 1.11x106 99.91 1.50x106 1.05x104 99.30 7 6.10x106 4.67x105 92.34 9.70x105 3.46x105 64.33 8 2.10x105 1.55x104 92.62 9.70x104 1.10x104 88.66 9 9.70x105 2.05x104 97.89 6.70x105 1.25x104 98.13 10 1.90x106 1.60x104 99.16 1.65x106 1.20x104 99.27 11 1.26x109 2.05x106 99.84 1.11x106 2.00x104 98.19 12 2.05x106 5.25x105 74.39 1.70x106 1.05x104 99.38 13 2.26x107 3.00x105 98.67 1.01x107 1.90x105 98.12 14 1.09x107 1.16x105 98.93 6.55x105 2.05x104 96.87 15 7.55x107 7.23x105 99.04 5.05x107 2.34x105 99.54 16 1.39x108 4.75x105 99.66 9.40x107 2.04x105 99.78 17 1.70x106 6.55x104 96.15 8.00x105 1.55x104 98.06 Average 1.82x108 4.15x105 92.02 2.60x107 1.11x105 91.90 The continuous flow anaerobic digestion process attained average removal rates of 93.63% and 88.48% of the total and thermotolerant coliform population, respectively. However, in their study of 1574 Efficiency of biological treatment… BRANCO, P. M. P. et al. Biosci. J., Uberlândia, v. 32, n. 6, p. 1572-1577, Nov./Dec. 2016 a biological treatment system composed of several stages, Souza et al. (2015) found lower total and thermotolerant coliform removal rates of 86.76% and 80.99%, respectively, upon comparing the influent and effluent only in the first portion of the system, which consisted of a septic tank. In Table 2, note that, upon entering the stabilization pond, the effluent from the digester presented a bacterial population of total and thermotolerant coliforms of 4.15x105 and 1.11x105 MPN 100 mL-1, respectively. After its 18-week dwell time in the stabilization pond, the effluent showed parameters of 2.13x104 and 1.23x104 MPN 100 mL-1. Therefore, the stabilization pond served as a complement in the biodigestion treatment and contributed to reduce the total and thermotolerant coliform population by 78.00 and 75.02%, respectively. Table 2. Most probable number (MPN 100 mL-1) of total and thermotolerant coliforms in the effluent of the digester and the stabilization pond, and removal rate (%) in the 18-week period. Week Total coliforms (MPN 100 mL-1) Thermotolerant coliforms (MPN 100 mL-1) Sampling point Removal rate (%) Sampling point Removal rate (%) Effluent Pond Effluent Pond 0 1.06x106 2.10x104 98.02 5.62x105 1.06x104 98.11 1 2.25x105 9.10x104 59.56 1.55x105 1.45x104 90.65 2 9.70x104 7.70x104 20.62 9.70x104 7.70x104 20.62 3 1.60x105 5.55x104 65.31 6.50x104 2.90x104 55.38 4 1.40x104 4.25x103 69.64 6.15x103 3.00x103 51.22 5 2.40x104 1.40x104 41.67 2.40x104 1.17x104 51.46 6 1.11x106 7.75x103 99.30 1.05x104 1.85x103 82.38 7 4.67x105 7.75x103 98.34 3.46x105 7.65x103 97.79 8 1.55x104 6.15x103 60.32 1.10x104 4.90x103 55.45 9 2.05x104 1.25x104 39.02 1.25x104 9.25x103 26.00 10 1.60x104 3.80x103 76.25 1.20x104 1.20x103 90.00 11 2.05x106 7.75x103 99.62 2.00x104 2.05x103 89.75 12 5.25x105 1.60x103 99.70 1.05x104 1.40x103 86.67 13 3.00x105 2.10x104 93.00 1.90x105 1.75x104 90.79 14 1.16x105 6.60x103 94.31 2.05x104 3.00x103 85.37 15 7.23x105 3.25x104 95.50 2.34x105 1.80x104 92.31 16 4.75x105 1.09x104 97.71 2.04x105 7.30x103 96.42 17 6.55x104 2.60x103 96.03 1.55x104 1.55x103 90.00 Average 4.15x105 2.13x104 78.00 1.11x105 1.23x104 75.02 An analysis of the overall performance of the continuous flow anaerobic digester and stabilization pond system (Table 3) revealed a 98.76% reduction of total coliforms and a 99.29% reduction of thermotolerant coliforms. Moura et al. (2011) reported the same performance after analyzing the treatment of domestic sewage in rural areas using a mini-treatment plant. The removal potential after all the stages of the treatment station evaluated by Souza et al. (2015) also achieved good efficiency rates of 98.6% and 99.3% for total and thermotolerant coliforms, respectively. Calijuri et al. (2009) achieved removal rates of 99.20% to 99.79% for total coliforms and of 99.72 to 99.99% for fecal coliforms in their treatment of domestic sewage in anaerobic and aerobic reactor systems, respectively. In Table 4, note that the average populations of total and thermotolerant coliforms in the influent, in the effluent from the digester and in the optional stabilization pond differed statistically by the Tukey test at a probability of 5%, indicating the efficiency of the two stages of the treatment. When combined with the continuous flow tubular digester, the stabilization pond contributed significantly to the biological treatment to reduce the microorganisms under study. 1575 Efficiency of biological treatment… BRANCO, P. M. P. et al. Biosci. J., Uberlândia, v. 32, n. 6, p. 1572-1577, Nov./Dec. 2016 Table 3. Most probable number (MPN 100 mL-1) of total and thermotolerant coliforms in the entire system, and removal rate (%) in the 18-week period. Week Total coliforms (MPN 100 mL-1) Thermotolerant coliforms (MPN 100 mL-1) Sampling point Removal rate (%) Sampling point Removal rate (%) Influent Pond Influent Pond 0 2.05x106 2.10x104 98.98 1.05x106 1.06x104 98.99 1 5.65x105 9.10x104 83.89 4.95x105 1.45x104 97.07 2 2.40x108 7.70x104 99.97 1.16x108 7.70x104 99.93 3 1.21x108 5.55x104 99.95 7.07x107 2.90x104 99.96 4 1.20x108 4.25x103 99.99 1.10x108 3.00x103 99.99 5 7.12x106 1.40x104 99.80 6.12x106 1.17x104 99.81 6 1.26x109 7.75x103 99.99 1.50x106 1.85x103 99.88 7 6.10x106 7.75x103 99.87 9.70x105 7.65x103 99.21 8 2.10x105 6.15x103 97.07 9.70x104 4.90x103 94.95 9 9.70x105 1.25x104 98.71 6.70x105 9.25x103 98.62 10 1.90x106 3.80x103 99.80 1.65x106 1.20x103 99.93 11 1.26x109 7.75x103 99.99 1.11x106 2.05x103 99.81 12 2.05x106 1.60x103 99.92 1.70x106 1.40x103 99.92 13 2.26x107 2.10x104 99.91 1.01x107 1.75x104 99.83 14 1.09x107 6.60x103 99.94 6.55x105 3.00x103 99.54 15 7.55x107 3.25x104 99.96 5.05x107 1.80x104 99.96 16 1.39x108 1.09x104 99.99 9.40x107 7.30x103 99.99 17 1.70x106 2.60x103 99.85 8.00x105 1.55x103 99.81 Average 1.82x108 2.13x104 98.76 2.60x107 1.23x104 99.29 Table 4. Most probable number (MPN 100 mL-1) of total and thermotolerant coliforms in the influent, effluent from the digester and in the stabilization pond, and removal rate (%) in the 18-week period *Different letters in the same column differ statistically at a probability of 5% However, despite the good removal rates of indicator bacteria by the biological treatment used in this study, the removal rate of thermotolerant coliforms (1.49x104) did not attain the standard of 4000 MPN 100 mL-1 established by CONAMA Resolution 357 (BRASIL, 2005) for discharge into class 3 freshwater bodies, nor can it be used to irrigate tree, cereal and forage crops. Although Souza et al. (2015) achieved a significant reduction in the number of coliforms, the bacterial populations in the effluent were still too high to allow for its reuse. Thus, the inclusion of a tertiary treatment of effluents from stabilization ponds should be considered with a view to improving their microbiological quality so as to reach lower counts than those established by current legislation, allowing these effluents to be used at least for the fertigation of tree, cereal and forage crops. Even though Souza et al. (2015) employed more processing steps in their biological system than those used in this study, they pointed out the need for tertiary treatment, such as disinfection by sodium hypochlorite or ultraviolet radiation, in Sampling point Total coliforms MPN 100 mL-1 Thermotolerant coliforms MPN 100 mL-1 Influent 1.82x108 a* 2.60x107 a Effluent from biodigester 4.15x105 b 1.11x105 b Effluent in stabiliz. pond 2.13x104 c 1.23x104 c 1576 Efficiency of biological treatment… BRANCO, P. M. P. et al. Biosci. J., Uberlândia, v. 32, n. 6, p. 1572-1577, Nov./Dec. 2016 order to ensure the removal of a pathogens from the effluent. Araújo et al. (2015), who used soil as a tertiary treatment after treatment in a system comprising a septic tank and anaerobic filter, found that contaminants were carried through the vertical and horizontal soil profiles, reaching surface water and groundwater. This finding therefore confirms the need for another stage in the system under study in order to minimize the microbiological load of thermotolerant coliforms prior to fertilization, in order to comply with Brazil’s legal standards for the reuse or disposal of treated wastewater. Several studies have reported the influence of HRT on the removal efficiency of total and thermotolerant coliforms in wastewater. Betancur et al. (2016) evaluated continuous flow digesters with HRT ranging from 2 to 7 days and reported that total and thermotolerant coliforms persisted after the treatment. Chen et al. (2012), who evaluated various HRTs of 11, 16 and 25 days, observed that the highest E. coli removal rate was achieved with HRT of 25 days. In this study, although the same HRT of 25 days was used, the reduction of the microbial load did not reach satisfactory parameters for reuse. Therefore, in addition to considering another step in the treatment, the need for a longer HRT should be evaluated as a means to improve the quality of the effluent. CONCLUSIONS The use of the biological system comprising a continuous flow anaerobic digester and an optional stabilization pond for the treatment of domestic sewage proved to be a good alternative in terms of the reduction of total and thermotolerant coliform bacteria. The system was efficient in reducing the number of indicator bacteria of fecal contamination, with the complete system reaching overall removal rates of 98.76% for total coliforms and of 99.29% for thermotolerant coliforms. However, a tertiary treatment involving polishing should be included to render the effluent suitable for use in fertigation or for discharge into water bodies. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors acknowledge CNPq, Brazil’s National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, for its financial support of this project. RESUMO: Aliar tecnologias que sejam viáveis e ainda eficientes em mitigar o impacto gerado pelos resíduos, que possuem potencial patogênico à saúde humana e animal, tem sido o propósito das ações de pesquisadores em todo o mundo. Dessa forma, objetivou-se avaliar um sistema de tratamento biológico, quanto a redução de coliformes totais e coliformes termotolerantes, visando a possibilidade de reciclagem orgânica do esgoto doméstico. Para tanto foi utilizado um biodigestor tubular de fluxo contínuo com tempo de retenção hidráulica (TRH) de 25 dias e uma lagoa de estabilização facultativa, responsável pelo tratamento de esgoto produzido por 150 pessoas, no município de Sertãozinho/SP. As amostras foram colhidas, semanalmente e sempre no mesmo dia, em três pontos distintos de colheita (entrada do sistema de tratamento, saída do biodigestor tubular e na lagoa de estabilização facultativa), totalizando 108 amostras. Para as determinações das populações de coliformes totais e termotolerantes foi utilizada a técnica do NMP em tubos múltiplos série de três tubos (APHA, 2005). O sistema foi eficiente quanto a redução no número de micro-organismos indicadores de poluição fecal atingindo 98,75% para coliformes totais e 99,26% para os termotolerantes. Entretanto, deve ser prevista mais uma etapa para polimento do efluente dando condições para sua utilização na fertirrigação ou lançamento em corpos de água. PALAVRAS CHAVE: Biodigestor anaeróbio fluxo contínuo. Esgoto sanitário. Lagoa de estabilização. Micro- organismos indicadores. Sustentabilidade ambiental. REFERENCES APHA; AWWA; WEF. Multiple tube fermentation technique for members of the coliform group. In: _____. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st ed. Washington DC: APHA, 2005. Section 9221. 1577 Efficiency of biological treatment… BRANCO, P. M. P. et al. Biosci. J., Uberlândia, v. 32, n. 6, p. 1572-1577, Nov./Dec. 2016 ARAÚJO, R. K.; WOLFF, D. B.; CRUZ, J. C.; BAGGIOTTO, C.; FRIEDRICH, M. Dinâmica das contaminações do solo e água subterrânea por efluente sanitário em área de preservação permanente com macrófitas e gramíneas. Ciência & Engenharia, v. 24, n. 1, p. 115 – 123, Jan – Jun 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/19834071.2015.28847 BETANCUR, O. J.; BETANCOURT, J. A.; ESTRADA, J; HENAO, F. J. Persistence of pathogens in liquid pig manure processed in manure tanks and biodigesters. Revista MVZ Córdoba, v. 21, n. 1, p. 5237-5249, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.33 BMGF (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation), 2011. Water, sanitation & hygiene. Strategy overview (2011) BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. CONAMA. Resolução nº 357, de 17 de março de 2005. Dispõe sobre a classificação dos corpos de águas e diretrizes ambientais para o seu enquadramento, bem como estabelece as condições e padrões de lançamento de efluentes, e dá outras providências. Brasília, 2005. CALIJURI, M. L.; BASTOS, R. K. X.; MAGALHÃES, T. B.; CAPELETE, B. C.; DIAS, E. H. O. Tratamento de esgotos sanitários em sistemas reatores UASB/wetlands construídas de fluxo horizontal: eficiência e estabilidade de remoção de matéria orgânica, sólidos, nutrientes e coliformes. Revista Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, v. 14, n. 13, 2009. CHEN Y, FU B, WANG Y, JIANG Q, LIU H. Reactor performance and bacterial pathogen removal in response to sludge retention time in a mesophilic anaerobic digester treating sewage sludge. Bioresource Technology, v. 106, p. 20-26, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.093 COLÓN , J.; FORBIS-STOKES, A. A.; DESHUSSES, M. A. Anaerobic digestion of undiluted simulant human excreta for sanitation and energy recovery in less-developed countries. Energy for Sustainable Development. v. 29, p. 57-64, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2015.09.005 KINYUA, M. N.; ROWSE, L. E.; ERGAS, S. J. Review of small-scale tubular anaerobic digesters treating livestock waste in the developing world. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 58, p. 896-910, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.324 MARÍN, I.; GOÑI, P.; LASHERAS, A. M.; ORMAD, M. P. Efficiency of a Spanish wastewater treatment plant for removal potentially pathogens: Characterization of bacteria and protozoa along water and sludge treatment lines. Ecological Engineering, v. 74, p. 28-32, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.027 MOURA, F. N.; BATISTA, R. O.; SILVA, J. B. A.; FEITOSA, A. P.; COSTA, M. S. Desempenho de Sistema para Tratamento e Aproveitamento de Esgoto Doméstico em Áreas Rurais do Semiárido Brasileiro. Engenharia Ambiental – Espírito Santo do Pinhal, v. 8, n. 1, p. 264-276, 2011. SOUZA, C. F.; BASTOS, R. G.; GOMES, M. P. M.; PULSCHEN, A. A. Eficiência de estação de tratamento de esgoto doméstico visando reuso agrícola. Revista Ambiente & Água, v. 10, n. 3, 2015.