Bioscience Journal | 2023 | vol. 39, e39070 | ISSN 1981-3163 1 Danieli Aline Cigolini RUZZA1 , Rosimeire Barboza BISPO2 , Eliane Cristina Moreno de PEDRI1 , Kellen Coutinho MARTINS1 , Kelli Évelin Müller ZORTÉA1 , Sérgio Alessandro Machado SOUZA1 , Telma Nair Santana PEREIRA3 , Ana Aparecida Bandini ROSSI1 1 Faculty of Biological and Agricultural Sciences, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Alta Floresta, Mato Grosso, Brazil. 2 Postgraduate Program in Genetics and Plant Breeding, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 3 Agricultural Science and Technology Center, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Corresponding author: Eliane Cristina Moreno de Pedri elicmbio@gmail.com How to cite: RUZZA, D.A.C., et al. Palynology and meiotic behavior of Genipa americana L., a species native to the Amazon. Bioscience Journal. 2023, 39, e39070. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719 Abstract Genipa americana L., commonly known as genipap, belongs to the Rubiaceae family. This study aimed to describe the pollen morphology of the species, evaluate its meiotic behavior and pollen viability, and provide information to help the maintenance and conservation of the species in its natural habitat. Flower buds were collected from 20 individuals in Alta Floresta and Matupá municipalities, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Pollen morphology was characterized using acetolysis and compared to existing literature. Meiotic and post-meiotic phases were analyzed using 2% acetocarmine stain, and pollen viability was estimated using Sudan IV, Alexander's stain, Lugol's solution (1%), and 2% acetocarmine stain. G. americana has medium- sized, 3-colporate pollen with reticulated exine and few meiotic irregularities. Acetocarmine stain showed the highest mean percentage of pollen viability (97.96%). Stain tests revealed significant differences, indicating high pollen viability and meiotic regularity. However, conservation and recovery of degraded areas are still necessary as there is no guarantee of successful reproduction due to factors associated with fragmentation, genetic drift, reduced gene flow, and inbreeding. Keywords: Colorimetric tests. Genipap tree. Pollen grains. 1. Introduction The genipap tree (Genipa americana L.), a native species of the Rubiaceae family, occurs in all tropical countries of the Americas. In Brazil, it can be found in all biomes and has solid economic potential in the northeastern states because its wood is used in civil construction, crafts, and furniture manufacturing. Its fruit is edible when fresh or in the form of sweets and liqueurs, and all parts of the plant have medicinal properties (Moura et al. 2016; Cardoso et al. 2020; Gomes 2020; Souza and Vieira 2020). The species is functionally dioecious, with pollination made by flies and bees (Andrade Bortoleti et al. 2018). Genipap seeds are dispersed by fish and mammals such as the tapir (Tapirus terrestris L.) and the red brocket deer (Mazama sp.), as reported by interviewed genipap harvesters (Ruzza et al. 2020). The conservation of the genipap tree, along with other native species, is a concern due to the risk of habitat loss resulting from human actions. Costa et al. (2019) emphasize the need to consider the frontier effect in territorial planning. Fragmentation of areas increases carbon emissions (Vijay et al. 2016; Zemp et PALYNOLOGY AND MEIOTIC BEHAVIOR OF Genipa americana L., A SPECIES NATIVE TO THE AMAZON https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6184-1477 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3455-1084 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7044-581X https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3470-3380 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0545-6130 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5582-7329 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9097-7576 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8318-5375 Bioscience Journal | 2023 | vol. 39, e39070 | https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719 2 Palynology and meiotic behavior of Genipa americana L., a species native to the Amazon al. 2017) and restricts the ecological functions of species in general, such as mutualism and interactions between species. In the case of tropical forests, fragmentation has more severe consequences due to the specialized interaction of plants with seed dispersers and pollinators, as well as allogamy reproduction (Matos et al. 2018). Habitat loss can result in genetic loss, altered distribution patterns, and even extinction if species reproduction is compromised. Therefore, it is necessary to conserve species ex situ and in situ (Arruda et al. 2018; Spoladore et al. 2017; Moraes et al. 2018; Garcia et al. 2019). Small populations are particu larly vulnerable to genetic drift, as their reproductive mechanisms are directly affected. The lower pollen grain availability can increase inbreeding, modify gene flow, and limit genetic diversity (Aguilar et al. 2019). Pollen morphology varies among species, making it necessary to conduct palynological studies to characterize pollen grains and identify the corresponding species. These studies contribute to various fields such as botany, paleontology (Zhao et al. 2019), melissopalynology (Souza 2018), and forensic investigations (Laurence and Bryant 2019; Alotaibi et al. 2020), among others. For pollen morphology analysis, the cellular contents must be extracted to facilitate the visualization of the sexine and the pollen apertures. For this purpose, the acetolysis method proposed by Erdtman (1952) is used, which involves the use of acetic anhydride and sulfuric acid. Abnormalities during microspore formation can result in non-viable pollen grains, potentially causing unsuccessful reproduction. Techniques such as pollen tube germination in vitro and in vivo, as well as colorimetric tests, are employed to assess pollen viability. In vitro tests involve preparing a culture medium, while in vivo tests evaluate fertilization of manually deposited pollen on flowers. Colorimetric tests are recommended for analyzing cell constitution and integrity using stains (Einhardt et al. 2006) such as Alexander’s stain, acetocarmine, Lugol’s solution, and Sudan IV. Acetocarmine stain indicates chromosome integrity, Lugol’s solution infers the presence of starch, Sudan IV stain suggests the presence of lipids, and Alexander’s solution reacts with protoplasm and the cellulose of the pollen wall (Dafni 1992; Munhoz et al. 2008). Due to the ecological, economic, and medicinal significance of genipap trees and their susceptibility to human impact, this study aims to describe the pollen morphology of Genipa americana and evaluate its meiotic behavior and pollen viability. This information will help the maintenance and conservation of the species in its natural habitat. 2. Material and Methods The collections were performed in the municipalities of Alta Floresta (09° 52' 32" S, 56° 05' 10 "W) and Matupá (10° 03' 27" S, 54° 55' 58" W), located in the north of the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso (Figure 1), during the flowering period, which occurs between August and October in this region. Flower buds were collected from G. americana individuals located at the edges of forest fragments and in areas of urban and agricultural use. Flower buds were collected from ten individuals in each municipality. Collection of plant material We collected 15 flower buds from each of the 20 functionally male individuals of G. americana, which varied in size and development stage, for observation. Flower buds in the pre-anthesis phase were selected for analysis. The buds were fixed in a solution of ethanol and acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 24 hours and then stored in 70% ethyl alcohol at 4°C until further evaluation of morphology, meiosis, post-meiosis products, and pollen viability. Bioscience Journal | 2023 | vol. 39, e39070 | https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719 3 RUZZA, D.A.C., et al. Figure 1. Geographic location of the collection points of the Genipa americana samples obtained in the municipalities of Alta Floresta e Matupá, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Morphological characterization of pollen The acetolysis method by Erdtman (1952) analyzed pollen morphology. Measurements were taken from photos of pollen taken on the same day of slide preparations to avoid possible issues with intumescence and changes in pollen size over time. Bioscience Journal | 2023 | vol. 39, e39070 | https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719 4 Palynology and meiotic behavior of Genipa americana L., a species native to the Amazon We measured the polar and equatorial diameters of pollen grains in the equatorial view (pollen grain perpendicular to the polar view) and the equatorial diameter in the polar view (pollen grain with the polar area facing the observer), as well as the thickness of exine layers (sexine and nexine). At least five pollen grains per slide were measured, and 25 measurements of each characteristic were taken, resulting in 25 pollen grains in the equatorial view and 25 in the polar view. According to Erdtman (1945), pollen grains were classified per size based on the length of the largest axis into the following categories: very small (<10 μ), small (10-25 μ), medium (25-50 μ), large (50- 100 μ), very large (100-200 μ), and gigantic (>200 μ). To classify pollen grains based on shape, we used the polar and equatorial axis (P/E) relationship in an equatorial view, as proposed by Erdtman (1952). The polynomial descriptions and terminologies used were based on the glossary of Barth (1965) and Punt et al. (2007). Pollen was classified with the polar area index (PAI) proposed by Barth and Melhem (1988, cited by Martins 2010). Pollen grain images were captured using a Leica DMLB photomicroscope and analyzed and measured using the Anati Quanti 2® UFV program (Aguiar et al. 2007). Meiotic behavior Two anthers per flower bud of each previously fixed individual were macerated on a slide with 2% acetocarmine stain. The material was then observed under an optical microscope, and the different phases of meiosis were analyzed and photographed. Normal stages and meiotic irregularities were also captured. Post-meiotic phase For estimating the meiotic index (MI), 1,500 post-meiotic products were counted on six slides, with 250 cells per slide. We considered tetrads with four cells of the same size as normal and any deviation (monad, dyad, triad, and polyad) as abnormal. MI was calculated with the expression proposed by Love (1951), where: • MI = [(total number of normal tetrads / total number of monads + dyads + triads + tetrads + polyads)] x 100. The recombination index was estimated by analyzing 95 cells in the diakinesis phase, according to Darlington (1958), using the formula: • RI = ([∑ total number of chiasmas / number of cells analyzed] + n value) x 100, where n is the haploid number of the species. Descriptive statistics were conducted on the data obtained from the evaluations using the GENES program (Cruz 2016). Pollen viability Colorimetric tests were performed using four different stains: 2% acetocarmine, 1% Lugol's solution, Sudan IV, and Alexander's stain. To prepare the slides, two anthers per flower bud, previously fixed in Carnoy's solution, were macerated on a slide in drops of each stain. A total of 250 cells were counted per slide, and ten slides were prepared for each stain, resulting in 2,500 pollen grains p er stain. The data were analyzed with the GENES program (Cruz 2016), aided by the simple random sampling method and a confidence interval for proportions. 3. Results Morphological characterization of pollen The pollen grains of G. americana are 3-colporate, with an equatorial diameter ranging from 31.32 to 43.55 µm and a polar diameter from 28.28 to 44.49 µm. They are considered medium-sized when Bioscience Journal | 2023 | vol. 39, e39070 | https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719 5 RUZZA, D.A.C., et al. ranging from 25 to 50 µm. Exine has an average measure of 2.94 µm and is cross-linked with sexine (Figure 2). G. americana pollen is classified as oblate-spheroidal, with a small polar area (Table 1). Figure 2. Photomicrographs of the pollen grains of Genipa americana. A) polar view showing the colpi; B) equatorial view; C) surface detail. Bar= 10μm. Table 1. Measurements of the pollen of Genipa americana L. x ± sx CI 95% CV % Polar diameter (EV) 27.44 - 44.35 μm 37.45 μm 6.11 Equatorial diameter (EV) 31.32 - 43.55 μm 38.51 μm 2.74 Equatorial diameter (PV) 28.28 - 44.49 μm 34.88 μm 3.39 Nexine 1.20 - 2.52 μm 1.65 μm 0.31 Sexine 1.23 - 2.02 μm 1.65 μm 0.23 Exine 2.4 - 3.87 μm 2.94 μm 0.33 P/E 0.97μm Oblate-spheroidal P A I 0.36μm Small polar area P/E = ratio of polar axis to equatorial diameter; PAI = polar area index; x: median; sx: standard deviation from mean; CI: confidence interval; CV (%): coefficient of variation; EV: equatorial view; PV: polar view. Meiotic behavior The meiotic analysis showed 11 pairs of chromosomes or bivalents in the cells during diakinesis (Figure 3). There was also one pair of rod chromosomes, which indicates the occurrence of a chiasma, and ten ring pairs, which suggests two chiasmas in most cells. However, we observed some cells with up to three rod and eight ring chromosomes. The recombination index (RI) for G. americana was 19.71% (Table 2). Table 2. Chiasmas observed in G. americana and calculation of the recombination index. Chiasmas Total Ring 648 Rod 179 Total cells 95 IR= (∑ chiasmas∕total cells) + n 19.71% Meiosis in the genipap tree was regular, but it showed some abnormalities. The most common ones consisted of chromosomes with irregular segregation, such as premature chromosomes in metaphase I and II and delayed chromosomes in anaphase I and II. There were also cells with cellular asynchrony in meiosis II, in which 30.48% had one of their chromosome groups in anaphase II and telophase II. G. americana had 76.92% normal cells (Table 3). Post-meiotic phase The analysis of post-meiotic products indicated that the levels of meiotic irregularities in G. americana are low, as the MI was 98.80%. There were no dyads or polyads. Bioscience Journal | 2023 | vol. 39, e39070 | https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719 6 Palynology and meiotic behavior of Genipa americana L., a species native to the Amazon Table 3. Percentage of abnormalities observed in meiosis of G. americana. Abnormality % of abnormality Premature segregation (metaphase I and II) 10.97% Delayed chromosome (anaphase I and II) 58.55% Asynchronous division 30.48% Number of abnormal cells 82 Total cells analyzed 259 % of abnormal cells 31.66% Figure 3. Meiosis in Genipa americana L. A - Diakinesis presenting 11 chromosomal pairs; 10 bivalents in ring-type meiotic configuration and one bivalent in rod form (arrow) were observed. B – Metaphase I showing a premature-separating chromosome. C – Metaphase I evidencing the spindle fibers. D – Anaphase I presenting two delayed chromosomes. E – End of telophase I and beginning of metaphase II, showing a chromosome moving away early. F-G – Anaphase II presented delayed chromosomes and lack of synchrony in the cell. H – Anaphase II with a delayed chromosome. I - Anaphase II showing lack of synchrony in the cell. J – Lack of synchrony in the cell division. K – Lack of uniformity of the metaphase equatorial plate. L – Irregular segregation of chromosomes. M – Monad. N – Triad. O – Normal tetrad. P – Pollen grain: viable (dark = purple) and unviable (light = green). Bar (A-D and F-O) = 20 µm; Bar (E) = 10 µm; Bar (P) = 50 µm. Bioscience Journal | 2023 | vol. 39, e39070 | https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719 7 RUZZA, D.A.C., et al. Pollen viability The Sudan IV stain test showed that 88.04% of the grains were stained, indicating the presence of lipids. The acetocarmine stain revealed intense red staining in 97.96% of the pollen grains, inferring chromatin integrity. The Alexander’s stain test indicated that 81.52% of the grains had an intact protoplasm and cell wall, evidenced by the violet protoplasm coloring and the green cell wall contour. Pollen grains lacking protoplasm and an intact cell wall had a greenish hue. The Lugol’s solution test revealed starch in more than 92.56% of the pollen grains, which turned brown with the stain. According to Table 4, the acetocarmine stain promoted the highest mean viability percentage in G. americana, which did not statistically differ from the means obtained with Lugol's solution and the Sudan IV stain. Table 4. Average percentage of viability of G. americana pollen resulting from colorimetric tests. Stains % of stained grains Acetocarmine 2% 97.96 a Lugol 1% 92.56 ab Sudan IV 88.04 ab Alexander’s stain 81.52 b Means followed by the same letter do not differ from each other by the Tukey test (p ≤0.05). 4. Discussion The genipap tree pollen is similar to that of Leptodermis purdomii, Leptodermis buxifolia, and Ixora venulosa Benth., which all belong to the Rubiaceae family (Dutra et al. 2020; Guo et al. 2020). However, they differ from each other in size and ornamentation. The peculiarities of pollen characteristics allow for the fertilization of the species by the appropriate pollen. According to Moore and Webb (1978), cited by Martins (2010), chemical compounds (released from the disintegration of carpet cells) called "recognition" proteins are stored in the apertures of the pollen ornamentation, and are responsible for pollen germination in the compatible stigma. The genipap tree pollen has a reticulated sexine ornamentation. The nexine and sexine of G. americana have similar measurements, constituting an exine thicker than 2 µm. G. americana pollen is medium-sized, oblate-spheroidal, and tricolporate, with a small polar area correlated with the type of long aperture. The characteristics analyzed in this study presented slightly higher values than those by Dutra et al. (2020). This variation may be due to the regional location of the individuals used in the studies; in this work, individuals from the Amazon biome were analyzed, while the cited authors investigated individuals from the Cerrado biome. The pollen viability of plant species is crucial for successful reproduction, and it depends on meiotic regularity. The observation of 11 pairs of chromosomes in diakinesis confirmed that G. americana is diploid (2n=2x=22). Although G. americana showed premature chromosome separation, delayed chromosomes, and asynchrony in cell division, its meiotic index was stable and exceeded 90%. The 1% Lugol's solution and Sudan IV stain indicated the presence of starch and lipids in over 85% of the genipap tree pollen. However, some studies advise against using these tests to estimate pollen viability because they may overestimate the data, as even non-viable pollen can contain these substances (Einhardt et al. 2006; Munhoz et al. 2008). Several studies recommend colorimetric tests for pollen viability due to the practicality in differentiating between viable and non-viable pollen and the presence of substances that react with the stain, such as Lugol’s solution (starch), Sudan IV (lipids), acetocarmine (chromatin integrity), and Alexander’s solution (nucleus integrity) (Alexander 1969; Dafni 1992; Martins 2010; Jesus et al. 2018; Santos and Añez 2018; Furini et al. 2020). Acetocarmine verifies chromatin integrity, and its use showed intact chromatin in 97.96% of G. americana pollen. Alexander’s stain revealed the lowest viability percentage for G. americana, with 81.52% viable pollen, indicating the high pollen viability of the species. This stain helps evaluate aborted or non - aborted pollen, reflecting the integrity of the nucleus and plasma membrane due to its malachite green Bioscience Journal | 2023 | vol. 39, e39070 | https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719 8 Palynology and meiotic behavior of Genipa americana L., a species native to the Amazon and acid fuchsin composition. Besides estimating pollen without a nucleus (non-viable), this stain can also differentiate viable from non-viable pollen (Hister and Tedesco 2016). Munhoz et al. (2008) also endorse this tool for taxonomists in identifying hybrids, as they may not present a nucleus or have altered nuclei. G. americana demonstrated high pollen viability, exceeding 80% when subjected to colorimetric tests using the four stains, indicating the species' potential for successful reproduction. The presence of meiotic irregularities alongside high pollen viability suggests that the species may have undergone cell repair mechanisms to correct any meiotic failures. Despite the species' regularity in meiosis and high pollen viability, there are still external factors to consider that impact its reproductive success, such as unsynchronized flowering periods between individuals of the same species (Deprá and Gaglianone 2018), fragmentation (Rosa et al. 2019), species distribution, and the lack of pollinators (Caires and Barcelos 2017; Meléndez et al. 2020). The landscape matrix where G. americana individuals are located in this study is highly fragmented, which restricts the movement of both pollen and pollinators. An approach to reducing the effects of fragmentation is the creation of ecological corridors (De Araújo and Bastos 2019), agro-ecological landscaping, and the implementation of agroforestry and forestry systems (Santos et al. 2019; Marsden et al. 2020). These strategies can facilitate the movement of pollinators and seed dispersers between populations, thereby increasing the chances of reproduction and regulating gene flow. G. americana can be included in such strategies alongside other native fruit trees to attract animals that will directly work as pollinators and seed dispersers to contribute to reproductive success. 5. Conclusions The pollen grains of G. americana are medium-sized, oblate-spheroidal, and 3-colporate with a reticulate exine. The colorimetric tests presented a significant difference and showed high pollen viability and meiotic regularity of the species. However, it is necessary to create means for conserving and restoring degraded areas, such as maintaining forest cover, creating ecological corridors, using native species in the landscape, and reducing pesticides and pollutants. Even with a large amount of viable pollen, there is no guarantee of success in the reproduction of the species due to various factors, mainly associated with fragmentation, genetic drift, reduced gene flow, and inbreeding. Authors' Contributions: RUZZA, D.A.C.: conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article, and critical review of important intellectual content; BISPO, R.B.: acquisition of data and analysis and interpretation of data; PEDRI, E.C.M.: analysis and interpretation of data; MARTINS, K.C.: analysis and interpretation of data; ZORTEA, K.E.M.: analysis and interpretation of data; SOUZA, S.A.M.: analysis and interpretation of data; PEREIRA, T.N.S.: analysis and interpretation of data; ROSSI, A.A.B.: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting the article, and critical review of important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethics Approval: Not applicable. Acknowledgments: This work was carried out with the support of the Coordination for Improvement of Higher-Level Personnel - Brazil (CAPES) – funding code 001. References AGUIAR, T.V. et al. Anati quanti: software de análises quantitativas para estudos em anatomia vegetal. Planta Daninha. 2007, 25(4), 649-659. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000400001 AGUILAR, R. et al. Habitat fragmentation reduces plant progeny quality: a global synthesis. Ecology letters. 2019, 22(7), 1163-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13272 ALEXANDER, M.P. Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technology. 1969, 44, 117-122. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520296909063335 ALOTAIBI, S.S. et al. Pollen molecular biology: Applications in the forensic palynology and future prospects: A review. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2020, 27(5), 1185-1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.02.019 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000400001 https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13272 https://doi.org/10.3109/10520296909063335 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.02.019 Bioscience Journal | 2023 | vol. 39, e39070 | https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719 9 RUZZA, D.A.C., et al. ANDRADE BORTOLETI, K.C. et al., 2018 Etnobotanical Retrospective and Features of the Multipurpose Plant Genipa americana L. (Rubiaceae). In: MARTINEZ J. L. et al., 1ed. Ethnobotany: Application of Medicinal Plants, CRC Press, p. 69-89. ARRUDA, S.A. et al. Physiological potential of jenipapo seeds stored in different packages. Bioscience Journal. 2018, 34(2), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v34n2a2018-38452 BARTH, O.M. Catálogo sistemático dos polens das plantas arbóreas do Brasil Meridional – Glossário Palinológico. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 1965, 63, 133-162. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v34n2a2018-38452 CAIRES, S.C. and BARCELOS, D. Colapso das abelhas: Possíveis causas e consequências do seu desaparecimento na natureza. Acta Apicola Brasilica. 2017, 5(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.18378/aab.v5i1.5294 CARDOSO, D.R. et al. Potencial tecnológico e composição de Farinha de Jenipapo (Genipa americana L.) obtida por secagem em convecção. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2020, 6(6), 33448-33467. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n6-050 COSTA, A., GALVÃO, A. and GONÇALVES DA SILVA, L. Mata Atlântica Brasileira: Análise do efeito de borda em fragmentos floresta is remanescentes de um hotspot para conservação da biodiversidade. Revista de Geografia, Meio Ambiente e Ensino. 2019, 10(1), 112-123. Available from: http://www.fecilcam.br/revista/index.php/geomae/article/viewFile/415/pdf_342 CRUZ, C.D. Genes Software: extended and integrated with the R, Matlab and Selegen. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy. 2016, 38(4), 547-552. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i4.32629 DAFNI, A. Pollination ecology: a practical approach. 1ª ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247203153_Pollination_Ecology_A_Practical_Approach DARLINGTON, C.D. Evolution of genetics systems. 2ª. ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1958. DE ARAÚJO, T.M.S. and BASTOS, F.H. Corredores ecológicos e conservação da biodiversidade: aportes teóricos e conceituais . Revista da Casa da Geografia de Sobral (RCGS). 2019, 21(2), 716-729. https://doi.org/10.35701/rcgs.v21n2.575 DEPRÁ, M. S. and GAGLIANONE, M.C. Interações entre plantas e polinizadores sob uma perspectiva temporal. Oecologia Australis. 2018, 22(1), 1-16. Available from: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/oa/article/viewFile/10537/10122 DUTRA, F.V. et al. Pollen morphology of Rubiaceae from Cerrado forest fragments: Pollen unit, polarity and diversity of the t ypes of apertures. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 2020, 282, 104297-104314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2020.104297 EINHARDT, P.M., CORREA, E.R. and RASEIRA, M.C.B. Comparação entre métodos para testar a viabilidade de pólen de pessegueiro. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2006, 28(1), 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452006000100004 ERDTMAN, G. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy Angiosperms. Stockholm: Almqvist e Wiksell, 1952. ERDTMAN, G. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. III. Morina L. With an addition on pollenmorphological terminology. Svensk Botanisk Tidskr. 1945, 39, 279-285. FURINI, T. et al. Estimativa de viabilidade polínica da Chenopodium ambrosioides L. através de métodos colorimétricos. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2020 6(7), 42386-42391. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n7-014 GARCIA, A.S. et al. High rates of pollen and seed flow in Hymenaea stigonocarpa on a highly fragmented savanna landscape in Brazil. New Forests. 2019, 50(6), 991-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09710-3 GOMES, M. Genipa in Flora do Brasil 2020. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. 2020. Available from: http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB14045. GUO, X. et al. Pollen morphology of Leptodermis (Rubiaceae) and its systematic implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2020, 306(2), 1- 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01641-3 HISTER, C.A.L. and TEDESCO, S.B. Estimation of pollen viability of strawberry guava (Psidium cattleianum Sabine) through distinct staining methods. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais. 2016, 18(1), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-084X/15_081 JESUS, L.D.G.A. et al. Eficiência de testes colorimétricos para determinação da viabilidade do pólen em acessos de feijão -fava (Phaseolus lunatus L). Revista Brasileira de Agropecuária Sustentável. 2018, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.21206/rbas.v8i1.430 LAURENCE, A.R. and BRYANT, V.M. Forensic palynology and the search for geolocation: Factors for analysis and the Baby Doe cas e. Forensic science international. 2019, 302, 109903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109903 LOVE, R.M. Varietal differences in meiotic chromosomes behavior of Brazilian wheats. Agronomy Journal. 1951, 43, 72-76. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300020005x MARSDEN, C. et al. How agroforestry systems influence soil fauna and their functions-a review. Plant and Soil. 2020, 453(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04322-4 https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v34n2a2018-38452 https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v34n2a2018-38452 https://doi.org/10.18378/aab.v5i1.5294 https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n6-050 http://www.fecilcam.br/revista/index.php/geomae/article/viewFile/415/pdf_342 https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i4.32629 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247203153_Pollination_Ecology_A_Practical_Approach https://doi.org/10.35701/rcgs.v21n2.575 https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/oa/article/viewFile/10537/10122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2020.104297 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452006000100004 https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n7-014 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09710-3 http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB14045 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01641-3 https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-084X/15_081 https://doi.org/10.21206/rbas.v8i1.430 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109903 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300020005x https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04322-4 Bioscience Journal | 2023 | vol. 39, e39070 | https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719 10 Palynology and meiotic behavior of Genipa americana L., a species native to the Amazon MARTINS, K.C. Morfologia polínica: aplicações, estudos e metodologias. Rio de Janeiro: CBJE, 2010. MATOS, V.P.V.D. et al. Forest fragmentation and impacts on the bird community. Revista Árvore. 2018, 42(3), e420309. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882018000300009 MELÉNDEZ, V. et al. Polinización y polinizadores amenazados en desaparecer. Bioagrociencias. 2020, 13(2), 109-119. Available from: https://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/BAC/article/viewFile/3558/1535 MORAES, M.A. et al. Long‐distance pollen and seed dispersal and inbreeding depression in Hymenaea stigonocarpa (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) in the Brazilian savannah. Ecology and Evolution. 2018, 8(16), 7800-7816. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4253 MOURA, S.M.S., SOUSA, S.R.S. and CONDE JÚNIOR, A.M. Genipa americana L.: prospecção tecnológica. Jornal Interdiscipllinar de Biociências. 2016, 1(2), 31-35. Available from: https://revistas.ufpi.br/index.php/jibi/article/view/5174/3109 MUNHOZ, M. et al. Viabilidade polínica de Carica papaya L.: uma comparação metodológica. Revista Brasileira de Botânica. 2008, 31(2), 209- 214. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbb/v31n2/v31n2a03 PUNT, W. et al. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 2007, 143, 1-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.06.008 ROSA, J.M. et al. Desaparecimento de abelhas polinizadoras nos sistemas naturais e agrícolas: Existe uma explicação?. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias. 2019, 18(1), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711812019154 RUZZA, D.A.C. et al. Etnobotânica do jenipapo (Genipa americana L., Rubiaceae) entre agricultores no município de Carlinda, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2020, 6(8), 61161-61184. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n8-509 SANTOS, P.Z.F. et al. Can agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision in agricultural landscape s? A meta- analysis for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Forest ecology and management. 2019, 433, 140-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.064 SANTOS, R.A. and AÑEZ, R.B.D.S. Aspectos da biologia floral de Curatella americana l.(Dilleniaceae), em um fragmento de cerrado antropizado, Tangará da Serra, MT. FLOVET-Boletim do Grupo de Pesquisa da Flora, Vegetação e Etnobotânica. 2018, 1(10), 22-36. Available from: https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/flovet/article/view/7713 SOUZA, F.P. and VIEIRA, K.P.M. Desenvolvimento e caracterização de farinha obtida a partir da casca do jenipapo ( Genipa americana L.). Revista Brasileira de Tecnologia Agroindustrial. 2020, 14(1), 3022-3045. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3895/rbta.v14n1.9173 SOUZA, R. R. Melissopalynology in Brazil: a map of pollen types and published productions between 2005 and 2017. Palynology. 2018, 43(4), 690-700. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2018.1542355 SPOLADORE, J. et al. Genetic conservation of small populations of the endemic tree Swartzia glazioviana (Taub.) Glaz. (Leguminosae) in the Atlantic Forest. Conservation Genetics. 2017, 18(5), 1105-1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-017-0962-6 VIJAY, V. et al. The Impacts of Oil Palm on Recent Deforestation and Biodiversity Loss. PLoS ONE. 2016, 11(7), e0159668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159668 ZEMP, D.C. et al. Deforestation effects on Amazon forest resilience. Geophysical Research Letters. 2017, 44(12), 6182-6190. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072955 ZHAO, K. et al. Palynological evidence of late Holocene paleo‐monsoon in eastern Pamir. Geophysical Research Letters. 2019, 46(16), 10015- 10023. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082941 Received: 5 August 2021 | Accepted: 30 January 2023 | Published: 5 May 2023 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882018000300009 https://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/BAC/article/viewFile/3558/1535 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4253 https://revistas.ufpi.br/index.php/jibi/article/view/5174/3109 https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbb/v31n2/v31n2a03 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.06.008 https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711812019154 https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n8-509 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.064 https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/flovet/article/view/7713 https://doi.org/10.3895/rbta.v14n1.9173 https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2018.1542355 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-017-0962-6 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159668 https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072955 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082941