BIOTROPLA Vol. 28 No. 3,2021: 221 - 230 DOI: 10.1 1598/btb.2021.28.3.1339 

DIVERSITY OF ENDOPHYTIC FUNGI ASSOCIATED WITH 
FRUITS A N D  LEAVES OF TAMARIND (Tamarindus indica L.) 

BASED O N  ITS RIBOSOMAL D N A  SEQUENCES 

NURUL ASYIQIN MOHD ZAINI', NURUL HUWAIDAH MD NIZAM, 
DAYANG FATIN ZAFIRA AWG ZAINAL ABIDIN, NOR IZANIS AZNI MOHD NAZRI AND 

NUR AIN IZZATI MOHD ZAINUDIN* 

Department $Biology, Factllo $Science, Universiti Putra Mala_ysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malysia 

Received 18 February 2020 /Accepted 2 May 2020 

ABSTRACT 

Plant-associated microbes are among essential natural resources that abundantly exist in a natural 
environment, such as endophyuc fungi. Studies o n  endophytic fungi in medicinal plants have allowed the 
discovery of numerous fungi species and their hidden potentials. Therefore, this study focused o n  the isolation 
and identification of endophyuc fungi from several plant parts of tamarind (T. indica), such as leaves and fruits. A 
total of 69 fungal cultures were successfully isolated and identified into 31 distinct species from 15 genera based 
on morphological characteristics and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence analysis using a Maximum 
Likelihood method. A high diversity of endophytic fungi associated with T .  indica were observed by Shannon- 
Wiener index H' (3.083). There were six different species obtained from the genus Colletotrichzlm (C. aenigma, 
C. brevisporum, C. cobbittiense, C. fmcticola, C. gloeosporiaides and C. siamense), and Diaporthe (D. arecae, D. ceratoxamiae, 
D. phaseolorzrm, D. pseudomangzjirae, D. pseudooctlii and D. pseudophoenicicala), four species of Aspergilzlzls (A. aczlleatzrs, 
A. carbonarizls, A.flautls and A. tzlbingensis), two species of Czlrvzrlank/Cochliobolzrs (C. geniculatzrs and C. lunata) and 
lV&rospora (N. lacticolonia and N. oryxae), two species of Lasiod$lodia (L. psetldotheobromae and L theobmmae) and 
Penicillm (P. m@ii and P. verruczllos~m). Other fungal species that were also identified are Botyosphaeria mamane, 
Fusaritlm solani, Tmncospora tephropora, Ph_yllostictafallopiae, Sarcostroma bisettllatnm, Tiichodema asperelhm and Xylarid 
j2ejeensi.r. 

Keywords: Endophyuc fungi, internal transcribed spacer (ITS), phylogenetic tree, tamarind 

INTRODUCTION 

Endophytic fungi are microorganisms 
inhabiting plant tissues in a part of their life 
without showing any harm toward the host 
plants. The species of endophytic fungi are 
expected in over a million species, which arisen 
from the natural surroundings W s h r a  e t  al. 
2018). They are widely dstributed, which have 
been found in many plant species that can grow 
in natural environments such as terrestrial plant 
communities (Nisa e t  al. 2015). Endophytic 
fungi such as Aspel.gllus, Colletotm'cbum, Fusam'um, 
Penicillm and Tm'cbodema may colonize several 
parts of plants, includmg fruits and leaves 

*Corresponding author, email: ainizzati@upm.edu.my 

(Hanada e t  al. 2010). There are many research 
studes reported the abundance of fungi 
associated with plants, however, there is a lack 
of study in the endophytic fungi associated with 
T. indica. 

Bourou e t  al (2010) reported, three genera 
of arbuscular mycorrhzal fungi (Acaulospora, 
Glomzls and Scutellospora) were associated with 
T. indim. Tamarind tree has been reported to be 
infected by some wood decay fungi such as 
Daldinid concentm'ca, Scbixopbylh commune, 
Flavodon jlavus, @ex bydnoides, and Pbellinus 
fastuosus (Nnagadesi & Arya 2015). In previous 
reports, Aspep!lIus n&eq Rhixopus stolonifeq 
Ulocladium cban'drum, Penicillium cb ysogenum, 
P. citm'num and Pbomopsis liquidambaris were 
associated with infected-tamarind fruit 



BIOTROPIA Vol. 28 No. 3,2021 

(Danggomen e t  al. 2013; Peter & Patrick 2017). Isolation, Purification and Preservation of 
Penin'Ilium cblysgenum and P. n'tm'nam are Microfungi 
confirmed pathogens and caused spoilage in 

All plant samples were washed in running tap 
fruits (Peter & Patrick 2017). Recently, 

water for 30 rnin to remove any debris or soil 
A.pergiIIus nniger has been proven as a pathogen 

before being processed. The leaves were cut into 
that causes black pod of tamarind (Meena e t  al. 

segments of 5 x 5 mm. Then, the surface of the 
2018). leaves and fruits was surface sterilized by 

Due to the regarbg e n d O ~ h ~ c  following the described by Ravindran 
fungal diversity associated with L indica is et al (2012) by immersing in 700,0 ethanol 
lacking, this study will provide important (5 sec), 4% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCI) 
information regarding the diversity of fungal (90 set., with sterile distilled water 
e n d o p h ~ e s  associated with L ifldica. This study (30 sec) and blotted dry with sterile filter paper. 
was aimed to determine the ~ulturable All of the segments were placed (3 segments 
endophytic fungal diversity associated with each plate) on potato dextrose agar (PDA) 
L indicd using molecular phylogenetic analysis of supplemented with streptomycin (0.05 g/rnl) 
ITS rDNA sequences. and neomycin (0.01 g/L) using sterilized 

forceps. The culture plate was incubated at 
room temperature (27 f 2OC) for 5 to 7 days or 

MATERIALS AND METHODS until there was an appearance of mycelium or 
colony from the sample fragments. 

Plant Samples The fungal mycelia grown from the parts of 
the sample were streaked on 4% water agar 

Collection of leaves and fruits samples of F A )  for purification. The WA plate was 
T. was cOm~leted in 2018 and 2019 at incubated for another 24 hours. Then, the single 
Jalan Asam Jaws, Universiti tip of hyphae was cut and transferred onto a 
Serdang Selangor located at 3"00709.0"N n, pDA plate and incubated at 2 7 & 2 0 ~  for 
101"42'34.gnE (Fig. 1). The fruits and leaves seven days. The pure isolated fungi were 
samples were collected using fruit picker from preliminarily identified by examining their 
20 L indicd trees with 2 m apart. All samples morphological characteristics. All isolates were 
were further placed in paper bags, properly maintained and preserved at -20 "C using a 
labeled, and brought to the Mycology modified filter paper method for working and 
Laboratory, Department of Biology for fungal stock cultures with slight modifications (Fang e t  
isolation. al. 2000). 

Figure 1 Samples of fruits (A) and leaves (B) of T. indica were collected in 
Persiaran Asam Jawa, Universiti Putra Malaysia 



Endophytic fungi from tamarinds - Mohd Zaini eta/ 

DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and 
Sequencing 

All isolates were cultured on PDA and 
incubated for 5 days. DNA of the isolates was 
extracted using UltraCleanB Microbial DNA 
Isolation IGt (MO BIO, Carlsbad, CA, USA) 
according to manufacturer's instruction. 
Amplification of the ITS regions was conducted 
using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) 
machine (Hercuvan Lab Systems, California, 
USA) involved primers ITS1 (5'- 
TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3') and ITS4 
(5'-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3') (Xkte 
e t  al. 1990). The PCR master mix was prepared 
from 4 pL of 5xPCR buffer, 2 pL of 2 mM 
dNTP, 2 pL of 25 mM MgClz, 1 pL of 10 mM 
for each primer, 0.1 pL of Taq DNA polymerase 
with concentration 5 U pL, 6.9 pL of nuclease- 
free water and 3 pL of DNA in a total volume 
of 20 pL. The PCR protocol with initial 
denaturation step was done for 30 sec at 95 OC, 
followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (95 OC for 
10 sec), annealing (59 OC for 15 sec) and 
extension (72 OC for 30 sec), and was completed 
by final extension step at 72 OC for 5 min. Then, 
the PCR product was prepared for gel 
electrophoresis or stored at -20 OC. 

The PCR products were gel-electrophoresed 
using 1.5% agarose gel. The mixture of 2.5 yL 
of 6x loading dye (blue/orange) and 2.5 yL of 
100 bp DNA marker were used as a ladder. The 
DNA and ladder were pipetted with 5 yl in 
volume into the holes using a micropipette and 
electrophoresed. The amplicon size was 
visualized under a UV trans-illuminator. The 
PCR products were purified using a QIAquick 
gel extraction kit (QIAGEN, USA), following 
the manufacturer's instructions. The purified 
PCR products were sequenced by using an 
Applied Biosystem 3730x1 DNA Analyzer 
(MyTACG Bioscience Company, MY). 

Phylogenetic Analysis 

Evolutionary analyses of ITS sequences were 
conducted in Molecular Evolutionary Genetics 
Analysis @EGA) 6.0 software to obtain 
alignment sequences (Tamura e t  al. 2013). 

Homologous sequences were obtained from 
The GenBank database NCBI (http://blast. 
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) using BLASTN search 
(https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blas t.cgi? 
PAGE-TYPE=BlastSearch) of the ITS 
sequences. The phylogenetic analysis was 
conducted using the Maximum Likelihood 
method based on the Tamura-Nei model 
with 1000 bootstrap test (Tamura & Nei 1993) 
in MEGA version 6.0. Saccharomyces cerevisde CBS 
1171 (AB018043) was used as an outgroup 
(Fig. 3). The GenBank accession number of new 
sequences were listed in Table 1. 

Species Diversity 

The species diversity was calculated by using 
the Shannon-Weiner Index (Spellerberg 2008) as 
formula below: 

where: 
H' = Value of Shannon Wiener's diversity index 
pi = Proportion of species 
s = Number of species in community 
1 = Number of indviduals in species 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

A total of 69 isolates of fungi were obtained 
from 20 fruit and leaf samples of T. indica, and 
were identified based on their morphological 
characteristics (Fig. 2) and ITS sequence analysis 
(Table 1 and Fig. 2). Thirty-two species belong 
to 15 genera were found in the present study 
including Aspergillas (4 species), Botyospbaerid 
(a single species), Colletotm'chmn (6 species), 
Cochliobolzls/ Czawalarid (2 species), Diaporthe 
(6 species), Fzuam'am (a single species), 
Lasiod$lodia (2 species), Nigrospoa (2 species), 
Penin'IIium (2 species), Tmncospora (a single 
species), Pbyllostictd (a single species), Sarcostroma 
(a single species), Tm'cboderma (a single species), 
and Xylarid (a single species) (Table 1). 



BIOTROPIA Vol. 28 No. 3,2021 

E L I  

1;igut-e 2 1:ungal morphological retrieved in the culture media isolation procedure. F,ndoph\-tic fungi were isolated From 
fruits and leaves o f  T ilzdi~u. I u n g i  a-ere cultivated i n  PDA m e d i u m  a t  27 O C  foi- 7 da1.s 

Based o n  phylogenetic analysis of ITS Basidiomycota). Clade A was divided into 2 sub- 
sequences of the 69 endophytic fungi isolated clades; Clade A1 represents isolates of 
from tamarind fruits and leaves, two major A.pe?gi/h.r, Bot!yoshaerid, Co//etot~icbzm, I>iapof-t/3e, 
clades ( A  and B) were generated (Fig. 3). The Fi~samUm, Nigrospa, ,.I'arcostroma, Tncboderma, 
first clade (Clade A) comprises isolates of fungi P~e/?ici//iunz, Ph~~lhsticta, and X y l a t a ,  whereas Clade 
under Phylum Ascomycota and Clade B A2 represents isolates of Lasiod$lodia and 
contains Tru~zcospora tephropora B3 148 (Phylum Cu~-~j~t/aria/ Cocbliobolus. 



Endophyuc fungi from tamarinds - M o h d  Zaini e t  al. 

Table 1 ITS sequences GenBank accession number o f  deposited fungal isolates from fruits and leaves of T. indicd 

No. Isolates S~ecies Plant oart GenBank accession number 

Aspeqi/lus aculeatus 
A .  carbonarizls 
A .  Javus 
A. tubingensis 
A. tubingensis 
Boflyosphaeria mamane 
Colletotrichnm aenigma 
C. brevispom 
C. cobbittiense 
C.ficticola 
C. gloeosporioides 
C. gloeosporioides 
C. gloeosporioides 
C. gloeosporioides 
C. gloeosporioides 
C. gloeosporioides 
C. gloeosporioides 
C. gloeosporioides 
C. gloeosporioides 
C. gheosporioides 
C. siamense 
C. siamense 
C. siamense 
C. siamense 
C. sidmense 
C. siamense 
C. siamense 
C. siamense 
Cumlaria lunata 

C. lnnata 
Cochliobolus geniculatns 
C. lunata 
Diqorfhe arecae 
D. ceratozamiae 
D. phaseolorzlm 
D. phaseolom 
D. phaseolom 
D. phaseolomm 
D. phaseolomm 
D. phaseolorcrm 
D. psendomang$rae 
D. pseudooculi 
D. psendoocnli 
D. psendophoenicicola 
D. psendophoenicicala 
Fusarium solani 
k o d i p l o d i a  psendo fheobmae 
L theobromae 
L theobromae 
Nigrospora lacticolonia 
N. lacticolonia 
N .  lactiolonia 
N .  olyzae 
N. olyzae 
N .  oryxae 
N. ovyxae 
Penicillinm roIfsii 
P. ro&ii 
P. rofsii 
P. rofsii 
P. ro&si; 
P. uemculosum 
Ph_yllostictaf.ll@iae 
Sarcostmma bisetnlatum 
Trichodemza asperellurn 
T .  asperellurn 
T .  asperellurn 

Fruit 
Fmit 
Fmit 
Fruit 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Fruit 
Fruit 
Fruit 
Fruit 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Fruit 
Leaf 
Fruit 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Fruit 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Fruit 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Fmit 
Fruit 
Fruit 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Fruit 
Leaf 
Leaf 
Fruit 
Fmit 
Fmit 
Leaf 
Leaf 



BIOTROPIA Vol. 28 No. 3,2021 

Figure 3 Phylogenetic tree generated from the Maximum Likelihood method based on the ITS sequences of 69 fungal 
endophytes sequences associated with T. indim. The tree generated using Tamura-Nei model with 1000 
Bootstrap replications. All Bootstrap scores with less than 50% are not shown in the tree 

Mt043776 C gloeosporrodes 83154 

MT043780 C glaeosponades 83158 

MT043796 C glaeosponades 83186 

MT043799 C gloeosporiodes 83169 

The Shannon index (H' = 3.083) indicated most diverse fungal genera isolated from 
that the tamarind fungal community possesses a tamarind leaves was Colletot?ichzlm and Diaporthe 
vast diversity of endophyuc fungi (Table 2). The (Fig. 3, Table 1). 

58 

- 
MT043784 C glaeosponardedes 83162 

MT043786 C cobbiffiense 83170 

MT043776 C glaeosponardedes 83154 

MT043781 C glaeosporiardes 83154 

- MT043792 C glaeosporiaides 83182 
MK204297 C. siamense 82885 

MK204295 C siamense 82892 

MT043774 C g1aeospo"oides 83152 

MT043801 C glaeosporioides 83191 

MK204289 C froct,cola 82961 

MK204314 C. aengma 82881 

93 - 
MK204292 C. siamense 82907 

MK204294 C. siamense 82921 

~ l i a x  

69 

MT043769 C. brev,sparum 83145 

MK204285 F salani82964 

MK204288 T asperellum 82963 

MT043803 N aryrae 83193 

MT043779 N lact,calonra 83157 

MT043782 N lact,calonra 83160 

MK204313 N a w e  82889 

MT043788 S biswfulatum 83172 

MT043785 X feejeensis 83163 

5 3  MT043765 D phaseolomm 83141 

A l i  

A 1  76 

-1g 
MT043763 D phaseolomm 83161 

MT043777 D phaseolomm 83155 

MT043770 D phaseolomm 83147 

MT043800 D. phaseolomm 83190 

MK204303 D. phaseolomm 82940 

MK204305 D pseudomangtferae 82928 

MT043798 D pseudooculr 83168 

MT043772 D ceatozamiae 83150 

MT043773 D pseodophoenicicola 83151 

MT043790 D pseudoculr 83180 

MT043793 D pseodophoenicicola 83183 

71 MK204301 D. arecae 82952 

MK204300 P venuculasum 82958 

89 - 

A l i b  99 

MK204304 A aculeatus 82931 

- 
52 

MK204306 P mlfw, 82925 

MK204308 P mlfsir 82919 

MK204310 P mlfw, 82899 

MK204309 P mlfw, 82894 

MT043804 P falloprae 83194 

A l i i  9 3  MT043767 B mamane 83143 

MT043789 L theobmmae 83179 

MT043794 L pseudotheobmmae 83184 

MK204311 A tubrngensrs 82916 

MK204302 A carbonanus 82948 

- 

- 

A 2  

MK204299 A Lvus 82959 

B 

MK204312 C lunsta 82902 

MT043766 C lunata 83144 

MT043771 T tephmpora 83148 

NR 111007 Sacchammyces cerevrsrae 



Endophyuc fungi from tamarinds - Mohd Zaini e t  al. 

Table 2 Endophyuc fungal percentage and Shannon-Wiener Index obtained from culture media isolation using fruits 
and leaves of T. indicd 

No. Species Number of isolate 

C. breuisporm 
C. cobbittiease 
C. fmcticola 
C. &eosporioides 
C. siamense 
C. lunata 
Cochliobolm geniculatu~ 
Diaporthe arecae 

Fusarium solani 
Lasiodiplodia theobromae 
L pseudotheobromae 
Nigrospora lactz'colonia 
N .  olyxae 
Penicillum ro@ii 

Tmncospora tephropora 
Ph_yllostictafallqbiae 
Sarcostroma bisetulatum 
Tiicboderma asperelhi 
Xylaria feejeensis 

Percentage (O/O) 

1.45 
1.45 
1.45 
2.90 
1.45 
1.45 
1.45 
1.45 
1.45 
14.49 
11.59 
4.35 
1.45 
1.45 
1.45 
8.70 
1.45 
2.90 
2.90 
1.45 
2.90 
1.45 
4.34 
5.79 
7.25 
1.45 
1.45 
1.45 
1.45 
4.34 
1.45 

Shannon-Wiener Index (H') 

Total 69 100 3.083 

In this study, the most abundant fungal 
(26 isolates) species obtained from T. indicd 
leaves was from genus Colletotm'chum where 10 
isolates were identified as C. gloeosporioides with 
14.49% (H' = 0.280). Endophyuc C. fructicola 
and C. siamense have been recovered from 
healthy Cymbopogon citratgs (Manamgoda e t  al. 
201 3). Weir et al. (2012) stated that C. siamense is 
geographically diverse with a varied host range 
and is a common saprobe or endophyte. 
Colletotm'chum species can be found abundantly 
forming its association with temperate plants 
and they are widely distributed in the tropical 
and subtropical areas (Cannon e t  al. 2012), but 
no report on associations with T. indim. A study 
by Boddy (2016) also reported that Colletotm'chum 
species could be existed w i h n  plant tissues 
without causing any harm while it is in an 
inactive state. These studies showed that 

members of Colletotm'chum exhibit a multiple life 
styles. 

Six isolates of endophytic Diaporthe 
phaseolomm have been isolates from healthy fruits 
and leaves of T. indica. Diapon'he spp. are 
known to be existed symbiotically alongside 
plants as saprobic, endophytic or 
phytopathogenic (Udayanga e t  aL 201 1; Tan e t  al. 
201 3; Gomzhina & Gannibal 201 8). According 
to Gonzalez and Tello (2011), endophytic 
Diapon'he species are commonly isolated from 
several hosts in the temperate and tropical 
region. Research on Diapon'he species by Gomes 
e t  al. (2013) collected several species of Diaporthe 
from Vaccinium growing regions in Europe 
i n c l u h g  D. phaseolomm and D .  arecae. Diaporthe 
pseudomangiferae has been reported cause 
inflorescence rot, rachis, canker, and flower 
abortion of mango (Serrato-Diaz e t  al. 2014). 



BIOTROPIA Vol. 28 No. 3,2021 

Endophytic C. lanata and Cochliobolas Pbyllostica species have been known to form 
genicalata; (telemorph of C. genicalata) have been 
isolated from leaves of T. indim. Two distinct 
species from genus Lasidioplodid that were 
isolated from the leaves of tamarind were 
Lasidioplodia theobromae and Lsidioplodia 
pseadotheobromae with a simdarity percentage of 
99% and 97% respectively. Similar to 
Colletotn'cham species, Carvalaria/Cochliobolas and 
Ldsiodiplodia are well-known plant pathogens and 
can also be endophytes. 

In t h s  study, Aspe@ills tabengensis was found 
associated with the T. indicd leaves. This species 
was found to form an association with many 
plant species such as the mangrove plant, 
Sonora desert plant (Nadumane et al. 201 6), and 
strawberry (Palmer et al. 2019). Previously, other 
species of Aspe@llas which is Aspe~illas niger was 
isolated from diseased-fruits of T. indica and 
caused black pod (Meena et al. 2018). Two 
species of Penicillm, P. ro@ii and P. vemcdosam 
have been isolated from healthy fruits and leaves 
of T. indim. Penicillizlm spp. are common 
pathogens and caused spoilage in fruits (Peter & 
Patrick 2017). The assemblage of endophytic 
fungi in healthy tissue of T. indica may indicate 
that some of the fun@ are possible latent 
pathogens and some may saprophytic. 

The other genus dominated the T. indica 
leaves was Nigrospora sp. Wang et al. (2017) 
claimed that Nigrospora sp. is a common in 
forming symbiosis with plants as pathogens, 
endophytes or saprophytes. Nigroqora sphaevica 
(synonym of N. oy~ae) was found inhabiting 
numerous hosts such as the Zea, Andropogon and 
Cymbopogon as reported by Wang et al. (2017). 
Supaphon and Preedanon (2019) also claimed, 
the species was isolated from Hehntbas annas as 
an endophyte. Botyo~haerid mamane was only 
one isolate obtained from this genus. According 
to Phdlips et al. (2013), this species that belonged 
to the Botryosphaeriaceae is existed diversely in 
nature as pathogenic, endophytic or saprobic 
with more preferable to woody plants. A study 
by Li et al. (201 8), also recorded the discovery of 
species of Botryosphaeriaceae from plantation 
trees including Canninghamina lanceolata, 
Dimocaqas longan, Melastoma sanguineam and 
Phoenix hanceana, whch were growing adjacent to 
Eaca4pta-r. 

their association with plants widely and can be 
either pathogens or endophytes. In this study, 
one isolate of Phyllostictd fallopide with a 100% 
percentage of similarity with the established 
sequence in the GenBank database. The 
morphology of the isolate characterized as 
P. fallpiae also fit the description of this species 
by Zhang et al. (2013). One isolate was identified 
as Xylarid feejeensis which was isolated from 
healthy leaves samples with 98.90% similarity to 
the GenBank sequences. According to Chen et 
al. (201 3) xylariaceous fungi are dominantly 
associated with the Dendrobiam species of class 
Orchdaceae. This f i n h g  had supported the 
existence of Xyb& sp. as an endophyte. 
Trancospora tephropora (synonym of Perenniporid 
tephropora) was the only basidiomycete found 
associated with healthy T. indicd leaves with 
similarity percentage of 99.84% from the 
sequence from GenBank database. 

CONCLUSION 

' I h s  study revealed that various endophytic 
fungi were isolated from the fruits and leaves of 
tamarind. The 31 species that have been 
successfully identified were A. acaleatas, 
A .  carbonakas, A .  flavas, A .  tabingensis, B. mamane, 
C. aenigma, C. brevispomm, C. cobbittiense, 
C. fmcticola, C. gloeo~;pokoides, C. sidmense, 
C. genicalatas, C. lanata, D. arecae, D. ceratoxamiae, 
D. phaseoloram, D. pseadomangiferae, D. pseadoocali, 
D. pseadophoenicicoh, F. solani, L. psezldotheobromae, 
L. theobromae, N. lacticolonia, N. ogqae, P. ro@ii, 
P. vemcalosam, T. tephropora , P. fallopiae, 
S. bisetalatzlm, T. asperelltlm and X.feejeensis. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The authors thank all staff of the 
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, 
Universiti Putra Malaysia for their fachties 
during the study. This work was partially 
supported by the Fundamental Research Grant 
Scheme (FRGS/1/2018/STG03/UPM/02/12/ 
5540129). 



Endophyuc fungi from tamarinds - Mohd Zaini et al. 

REFERENCES 

Boddy L. 2016. Fungi, ecosystems, and global change. 
In The fungi (pp. 361-400). Oxford, London: 
Academic Press. 

Bourou S, Ndiaye F, Diouf M, Diop T, Damme PV. 2010. 
Tamarind (Tamarindus indicd L.) parkland 
mycorrhizal potential within three ago-ecological 
zones of Senegal. Fruits 65(6):377-385. 

Cannon PF, Damm U, Johnston PR, Weir BS. 2012. 
Colletotricbm-current status and future 
directions. Stud Mycol73: 181-213. 

Chen J, Zhang LC, Xing YM, Wang YQ, Xing XK, Zhang 
DW, Liang HQ, Guo SX. 2013. Diversity and 
taxonomy of endophyuc Xylariaceous fungi from 
medicinal plants of Dendrobium (Orchidaceae). 
PLoS One 8(3):e58268. 

Danggomen A, Visarathanonth N, Manoch L, Piasai 0. 
2013. Morphological studies of endophytic and 
plant pathogenic Pbomopsis liquidambaris and 
Diapon'he pbaseolorm (P. pbaseoli anamorph) from 
healthy plants and diseased fruits. Thai J Agri Sci 
46(3):157-64. 

Fong YK, Anuar S, Lim HP, Tham FY, Sanderson FR. 
2000. A modified filter paper technique for long- 
term preservation of some fungal cultures. 
Mycologist 14:121-30. 

Gomes RR, Glienke C, Videira SIR, Lombard L, 
Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. 2013. Diaporthe: a 
genus of endophytic, saprobic and plant 
pathogenic fungi. Persoonia 31 (1):l-41. 

Gomzhina MM, Gannibal PB. 2018. First report of the 
fungus Diaporthe pbaseolom on sunflower in 
Russia. Microbiol Independent Res J 5(1), 65-70. 

Gonzilez V, Tello ML. 2011. The endophytic mycota 
associated with Vitir uinifera in central Spain. 
Fungal Divers 47:29-42. 

Hanada RE, Pomella AWV, Costa HS, Bezerra JL, 
Loguercio LL, Pereira JO. 2010. Endophyuc 
fungal diversity in Tbebroma cacao (cacao) and 
Tbeobroma grandzj'lormm (cupuacu) trees and their 
potential for growth promotion and biocontrol of 
black-pod disease. Fungal Biol114:901-10. 

Li GQ, Liu FF, Li JQ, Liu QL, Chen SF. 2018. 
Botryosphaeriaceae from Eucabptus plantations 
and adjacent plants in China. Persoonia 40:63-95. 

Manamgoda DS, Udayanga D, Cai L, Chukeatirote E, 
Hyde I D .  201 3. Endophytic Colletotricbm from 
tropical grasses with a new species C. endophtica. 
Fungal Divers 61 (1):107-15. 

Meena C, Bhatnagar P, Meena RR, Prahlad VC, I<umar A. 
2018. First report of black pod in tamarind due to 
Aspe~iIlus niger from India. Int J Curr Microbiol 
Appl Sci 7(4):1127-30. 

Mishra Y, Singh A, Batra A, Sharma MM. 2014. 
Understanding the biodiversity and biological 
applications of endophytic fungi: A Review. J 
Microb Biochem Techno1 S8: 004. 
doi:10.4172/1948-5948.S8-004 

Nadumane VI(, Venkatachalam P, Gajaraj B. 2016. 
A.pergiIlus applications in cancer research. In: New 
and Future Developments in Microbial Biotecbnology and 
Bioengineering (pp. 243-55). Elsevier. 

Nisa H, ICamili AN, Nawchoo LA, Shafi S, Shameem N, 
Bandh SA. 2015. Fungal endophytes as prolific 
source of phytochemicals and other bioactive 
natural products: A review. Microb Pathog 82: 
50-9. 

Nnagadesi PI<, Arya A. 2015. Wood decay fungi 
associated with tamarind tree in Gujarat, India. Int 
Lett Nat Sci 46:84-91. 

Palmer MG, Mansouripour SM, Blauer I<A, Holmes GJ. 
2019. First report of A.pe@ills tubingensis causing 
strawberry fruit rot in California. Plant 
Dis 103(11):2948. 

Peter WS, Patrick, OH. 2017. Identification of fungal 
species associated with contaminants and 
pathogenicity on Tamarindus indica fruits from 
Maiduguri Monday Market, Borneo State Nigeria. 
Plant 5(2):36-41. 

Phillips AJL, Alves A, Abdollahzadeh J, Slippers B, 
Wingfield MJ, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW 2013. 
The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species 
known from culture. Stud Mycol 76:51-167. 

Ravindran C, Naveenan T, Varatharajan GR, 
Rajasabapathy R, Meena RM. 2012. Antioxidants 
in mangrove plants and endophytic fungal 
associations. Bot Mar 55:269-79. 

Sabra M, Aboulnasr A, Franken P, Perreca E, Wright LP, 
Camehl I. 2018. Beneficial root endophytic fungi 
increase growth and quality parameters of sweet 
basil in heavy metal contaminated soil. Front Plant 
Sci 8:1726. 

Serrato-Diaz LM, Rivera-Vargas LI, French-Monar RD. 
2014. First report of Diaporthe pseudomangiferae 
causing inflorescence rot, rachis, canker, and 
flower abortion of mango. Plant Dis 98(7):1004-5. 

Spellerberg IF. 2008. Encyclopedia of Ecology. Lincoln 
(NZ): Lincoln University. p.3249-52. 

Supaphon P, Preedanon S. 2019. Evaluation of in vitro 
alpha-glucosidase inhibitory, antimicrobial, and 
cytotoxic activities of secondary metabolites from 
the endophytic fungus, Nigmspora spbaerica, isolated 
from Heliantbw annuus. Ann Microbiol 69:1397- 
406. 

Tamura I<, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of 
nucleotide substitutions in the control region of 
mitochondria1 DNA in humans and chimpanzees. 
Mol Biol Evol 10:512-26. 



BIOTROPIA Vol. 28 No. 3,2023 

Tarnura I<, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, I<umar S. 
2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics 
Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol30:2725-9. 

Tan YP, Edwards J, Grice I-, Shivas RG. 2013. 
Molecular phylogenetic analysis reveals six new 
species of Diaporthe from Australia.Funga1 
Divers 61(1):251-60. 

Udayanga D, Xingzhong L, McICenzie EHC, Chukeatirote 
E, Bahkali AHA, Hyde I(D. 2011. The genus 
Pbomopsir: biology, applications, species concepts 
and names of common pathogens. Fungal 
Divers 50:189-225. 

Wang M, Liu F, Crous PW, Cai L. 2017. Phylogenetic 
reassessment of Nigrospora: ubiquitous endophytes, 
plant and human pathogens. Persoonia 39:118. 

Weir B, Johnston PR, Damm U. 2012. The Colletotricbm 
gloeosporioidees species complex. Stud Mycol73:115-80. 

White TJ, Burns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification 
and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA 
genes for phylogenetics. In M A Innis, D H 
Gelfand, J J Sninsky and T J White (eds.). PCR 
protocols: A guide methods and applications. San 
Diego: Academic Press, 315-22. 

Xia Y Sahib MR, Amna A, Opiyo SO, Zhao Z, Gao YG. 
2019. Culturable endophytic fungal communities 
associated with plants in organic and conventional 
farming systems and their effects on plant growth. 
Sci Rep 9:1669. 

Zhang I<, Su W, Cai L. 2013. Morphological and 
phylogenetic characterisation of two new species 
of Phyllosticta from China. Mycol Prog 12:547-56.