Microsoft Word - 19


BIOTROPIA  NO. 21, 2003 : 19 - 31 

ANTAGONISTIC EFFECT OF THREE FUNGAL ISOLATES TO          
AFLATOXIN-PRODUCING^spergiY/HS/JavHS 

                                                                  OKKY SETYAWATI DHARMAPUTRA 

SEAMED BIOTROP, P.O. BOX 116, Bogor, Indonesia and Faculty of Mathematics and                      
Natural Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia 

ASMARINA S.R. PUTRI, INA RETNOWATI and SANTIAMBARWATI                               
SEAMEO BIOTROP, P.O. BOX 116, Bogor, Indonesia 

ABSTRACT 

Aflatoxin contamination in preharvest peanuts can be controlled among others by using antagonistic fimgi 
to aflatoxin-producing fungi. Aspergillus flavus is one of the fungal species where certain strains can produce 
aflatoxin. Informations regarding the type of interactions between antagonistic fungi and toxigenic A. flavus, and the 
effects of culture filtrates of the test fungi on the growth and aflatoxin production of toxigenic A. flavus are 
necessary, before antagonistic fungi could be used as biocontrol agent. Three fungal isolates (nontoxigenic A. 
flavus BIO 2127, A. niger BIO 2129 and Trichoderma harzianum BIO 19130) were tested for their antagonistic 
properties against toxigenic A. flavus BIO 2132 using direct and indirect confrontation methods. 

On direct confrontation method, four kinds of agar media were used, i.e PDA (Potato Dextrose Agar), MEA 
1% (Malt Extract Agar 1%), SMKYA (Sucrose 200 g, MgSO47H2O 0.5 g, KNO3 3 g, yeast extract 7 g, and block agar 
AA 20 g), and the mixture of MEA 1 % + SMKYA (1:1). The results indicated that the type of interactions between 
toxigenic A. flavus either with nontoxigenic A. flavus or with T. harzianum was B type. In this type of interaction, 
the growth of both toxigenic A. flavus and the test fungi inhibited each other (mutual inhibition) with the zone of 
inhibition < 2 mm. Type of interaction between toxigenic A. flavus and A. niger depended on the kind of media. On 
SMKYA and MEA 1% + SMKYA media, the interaction was B type, while on PDA and MEA 1% media it was 
D type. In this D type of interaction, toxigenic A. flavus and A. niger inhibited each other (mutual inhibition) at a 
distance > 2 mm. 

Culture filtrates derived from nontoxigenic A. flavus and A. niger grown on ME 1%, SMKY and ME 1% + 
SMKY inhibited the growth (based on dry weight) of toxigenic A. flavus, except culture filtrates derived from T. 
harzianum grown on SMKY and ME 1% + SMKY media stimulated the growth of toxigenic A. flavus. 

Culture filtrates of nontoxigenic A. flavus, A. niger and T. harzianum inhibited aflatoxin B\ production 
of toxigenic A. flavus. Culture filtrates of A. niger and T. harzianum with conidial concentrations of IxlO6, 
2xl06 and 3xl06 per ml inhibited aflatoxin B, production up to 100%. The percentage of inhibition of aflatoxin Bi 
production increased with the increase of conidial concentrations of nontoxigenic A. flavus. The highest percentage 
of inhibition of aflatoxin BI production (62.5%) was obtained from conidial concentration of 3xl06 per ml. 

Aspergillus niger was the most potential fungus in inhibiting the growth of toxigenic A. flavus, either on 
agar media or on culture filtrates of test fungi. Culture filtrate of A. niger was also the most potential filtrate in 
inhibiting aflatoxin BI production of toxigenic A. flavus. 

Keywords:    Antagonistic effect / Aspergillus flavus I Aspergillus niger I Trichoderma harzianum I aflatoxin 

19 



BIOTROPIA NO. 21,2003 

INTRODUCTION 

Aflatoxin contamination in peanuts occurs when kernels become infected by Aspergillus 
flavus, A. parasiticus and A. nomius, under drought stress before harvest, during the drying phase in 
the field, or under unsuitable storage conditions. Pitt et al. (1991) reported that A. flavus (and A. 
parasiticus) are able to grow as commensals in developing peanut plants, and from there the fungi can 
invade developing peanuts. 

Levels of 1000 ppb of aflatoxin could cause acute liver damage in man and animals. Lower 
levels of aflatoxin in peanut products if consumed could cause liver cancer and premature death in 
humans, as well as reducing productivity of livestock (Pitt and Hocking 1996). 

According to Pitt and Hocking (1996), 45% of 215 peanut samples collected from retailers 
in Bogor and Yogyakarta contained more than 50 ppb of aflatoxin, 33% more than 300 ppb, and 
22% exceeding 1000 ppb. In foodstuff, the limit of aflatoxin content determined by U.S. Food 
and Drug Administration was 20 ppb (Park 1993). Codex Alimentarius Commision adopted the 
maximum level of total aflatoxin content in peanuts intended for further processing at 50 ppb 
(FAO and WHO 1999). 

During the past 20 years, a number of approaches have been advocated and tested for 
reduction of aflatoxins in peanuts: resistant cultivars, thickened shells, waxy testa, improved 
farm management techniques and postharvest procedures involving drying and storage. Some of 
these approaches have merit, but despite the expenditure of large sums of research funding aflatoxin 
in peanuts remains a serious commercial problem. Other approaches such as using antagonistic fungi 
to aflatoxin-producing fungi are still needed (Pitt 1999). 

One of the more promising method is the concept of biocontrol by competitive exclusion (Pitt 
1999). This involves the use of competitive fungi to reduce the possibility of toxigenic fungi 
present in the soil entering developing peanuts and then producing aflatoxins in them. According 
to Dorner et al. (1992), nontoxigenic A. parasiticus can be used as biocompetitive agent to control 
aflatoxin contamination in peanuts before harvest. Dharmaputra et al. (2001) reported that among 
fungi isolated from the soil of peanut farms at Wonogiri regency (Central Java), nontoxigenic 
A. flavus BIO 2127, A. niger BIO 2129 and Trichoderma harzianum BIO 19130 were antagonistic 
to toxigenic A. flavus BIO 2128. 

The objectives of this study were to get information on the type of interactions between each 
of the three fungal isolates (nontoxigenic A. flavus, A. niger and T. harzianum) and toxigenic A. 
flavus; and to investigate the effects of culture filtrates of the test fungi on the growth and aflatoxin 
production of toxigenic A. flavus. 

MATERIALS AND METHODS                                                               

Fungal isolates 

Fungal isolates used were toxigenic A. flavus BIO 2132, isolated from peanut farms in Pati 
regency, Central Java, in January 2002; nontoxigenic A. flavus BIO 

20 



Antagonistic effect of three fungal isolates - Okky S. Dharmaputra  et  al. 

2127, A. niger BIO 2129 and T. harzianum BIO 19130, isolated from soils of peanut farms at 
Wonogiri regency, Central Java, in May 2000 (Dharmaputra et al 2001). The four fungal isolates 
belong to the Plant Pathology Laboratory Culture Collection, SEAMEO BIOTROP. Each fungal 
isolate was subcultured on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium and incubated at room temperature 
(28 ± 2°C) for 7 days. 

Test of antagonism between three fungal isolates and toxigenic A. flavus 

1.  Direct confrontation between fungal colonies 

Nontoxigenic A. flavus, A. niger and T. harzianum isolates were tested for their antagonistic 
property against toxigenic A. flavus using direct opposition method (Dennis and Webster 1971) on 
four agar media, i.e. PDA, ME A 1% (Malt Extract Agar 1%), SMKYA (Sucrose 200 g, MgSO4.7H 
O 0.5 g, KNO3 3 g, yeast extract 7 g, block agar AA 20g) and the mixture of MEA 1% + SMKYA 
(1:1). Toxigenic A. flavus (4 mm in diam) was placed on the four media in a Petri dish (diam 9 
cm). At the same time at a distance of 3 cm from toxigenic A. flavus inoculum, each test fungus 
was inoculated on the same dish. The plates were incubated at room temperature. Three 
replications were used for each treatment. Observations were carried out seven days after 
incubation on the inhibition of mycelial growth of toxigenic A. flavus by the test fungi using the 
formula of Fokkema (1973): 

r i - r 2
1=                                x l O O %   
                                            R1 

where I = percentage of inhibition 
f] = radius of toxigenic A. flavus away from the test fungi 
r2 = radius of toxigenic A. flavus towards the test fungi 

The type of interactions between toxigenic A. flavus and each of the test fungus was 
determined based on Wheeler and Hocking (1993), adapted from Magan and Lacey (1984), as 
presented in Table 1. 

2.  Indirect confrontation 

2.1.     Preparation of cultural filtrates of three test fungal isolates 

Isolates of nontoxigenic A. flavus, A. niger and 7". harzianum were grown respectively on 
PDA medium in Petri dishes (9 cm in diam) and incubated at room temperature for 7 days. 
Fungal conidia were suspended in sterile distilled water. Two ml of each test fungal isolate 
suspension with three conidial concentrations (IxlO6, 2xl06 and 3xl06 conidia/ml) were'grown 
on 100 ml ME 1%, 100 ml SMKY, and 100 ml of the mixture of ME 1% + SMKY (1:1) liquid 
media in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask, respectively, and then incubated at room 

21 



                                                  BIOTROPIA  NO .21,2003 



Antagonistic effect of three fungal isolates - Okky S. Dharmaputra   et  al. 

temperature for 14 days. The concentrations of conidia were determined by microscopically 
counting the number of conidia using a haemacytometer. After incubation, the culture filtrates of 
the fungi were separated from their colonies using sterile filter paper No. 1, followed by 
sterilization of the culture filtrates using Millipore (0.45 jam pore size). 

2.2.   Effect of culture filtrates of test fungi on the growth and aflatoxin production of 
toxigenic A. flavus 

One ml of conidial suspension of toxigenic A. flavus ( I x l O 6  conidia/ml) was inoculated into 50 
ml of sterilized culture filtrates derived from each treatment combination in a glass bottle volume 
100 ml. They were then incubated at room temperature for 10 days. As control, toxigenic A. flavus 
was grown on ME 1%, SMKY and in the mixture of ME 1% + SMKY liquid media. Three 
replications were used for each treatment (including the control). Observations were made on the dry 
weight of mycelia of toxigenic A. flavus and aflatoxin production. The dry weight of mycelia was 
determined by drying the fungal colonies in an oven at 95°C until a constant weight was attained 
(Gourama and Bullerman 1995). Aflatoxins were analyzed using a Thin Layer Chromatography 
method (Bainton et al. 1980). In this case, aflatoxin in culture filtrates was extracted using 
chloroform and identified by two dimensional TLC using standard comparison. Aflatoxin content 
produced by the most potential test fungal isolate was confirmed using a High Performance Liquid 
Chromatography method (Rodriguez and Mahoney 1994). 

Statistical analysis 

The data were analyzed using a completely randomized factorial design with 2 factors. The first 
and the second factors were the isolates of test fungi (nontoxigenic A. flavus, A. niger, and T. 
harzianum) and conidial concentration of test fungi (1x106, 2x106 and 3xl06 conidia/ml), respectively. 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

Type of interaction and percentage of growth inhibition between toxigenic A. flavus and test 
fungi on various agar media 

Two types of interactions (B and D types) were found between each of the three test fungi and 
toxigenic A. flavus after 7 days of incubation (Table 2). On the type of interaction B, the test fungi 
and the toxigenic A. flavus inhibited each other's growth with a zone of inhibition < 2mm. This type 
of interaction was found on the interaction between the toxigenic and the nontoxigenic A.flavus on 
PDA, MEA 1%, SMKY A, and MEA 1% + SMKYA media; between the toxigenic A. flavus and 

23 



BIOTROPIA  NO. 21,2003 

A.niger on SMKYA and MEA 1% + SMKYA media; between the toxigenic A. flavus and T. 
harzianum on PDA, MEA 1%, SMKYA, and MEA 1% + SMKYA media. On the D type of 
interaction, the test fungi and the toxigenic A. flavus inhibited each other's growth with a zone of 
inhibition > 2 mm. This type of interaction was found on the interaction between the toxigenic A. 
flavus and A. niger on PDA and MEA 1% media. On the two media a zone of inhibition was 
found between the colony of A. niger and toxigenic A. flavus. It was assumed that A. niger produced 
antibiotic. According to Jeffries and Young (1994), production of extracellular metabolites (such 
as antibiotics and lytic enzymes) was one of the mechanisms of antagonism between two fungal 
isolates. Dharmaputra et al. (2001) reported that the type of interaction between toxigenic A. flavus 
isolate 557 and T. harzianum, and between A. flavus isolate 102 and T. harzianum were A and B 
types, respectively; between toxigenic A. flavus isolate 23j and nontoxigenic A. flavus isolate 
18t was B type; between toxigenic A. flavus isolate 102 and A. niger was D type. 

The kind of media did not give significant differences on the percentage of growth 
inhibition (based on mycelial growth) of toxigenic A. flavus by the three test fungal isolates. 
Nevertheless, the highest percentage of growth inhibition was found on SMKYA medium (43.77%) 
(Table 3). 

The test fungal isolates gave very significant differences on the percentage of growth 
inhibition of toxigenic A. flavus on SMKYA medium. Trichoderma harzianum caused the highest 
growth inhibition (49.09%) compared to toxigenic A. flavus on SMKYA medium (Table 4). 

24 



Antagonistic effect of three fungal isolates - Okky S. Dharmaputra  et  al 

The  effect  of culture  filtrate  of test fungi  on  the  growth  and  aflatoxin production of 
toxigenic A. flavus 

The effect of culture filtrates of nontoxigenic A. flavus and A. niger on the percentage of 
growth inhibition of toxigenic A. flavus (based on the dry weight of mycelia) was not significantly 
different. Nevertheless, the highest percentage of growth inhibition (69.44%) of toxigenic A. 
flavus caused by the culture filtrate of nontoxigenic A. flavus was on ME 1%, while that of the 
culture filtrate of A. niger (72.51%) was on SMKY (Table 5). It indicated that nontoxigenic A. flavus 
was more competitive to toxigenic A. flavus on ME 1% medium compared with those of SMKY 
and ME 1% + SMKY media, while A. niger was more competitive on SMKY medium compared 
with those on ME 1% and ME 1% + SMKY media. 

Culture filtrate derived from T. harzianum grown only on ME 1% medium inhibited the 
growth of toxigenic A. flavus (63.64%), while on SMKY and ME 1% + SMKY media the filtrate 
stimulated the growth of toxigenic A. flavus (38.0 and 31.58%, respectively) (Table 6). It indicated 
that culture filtrate of T. harzianum was only effective in inhibiting the growth of toxigenic A. flavus 
on ME 1% medium. 

Using TLC method, only aflatoxin B, was detected by toxigenic A. flavus. As aflatoxin was 
not produced on ME 1 % medium, consequently only SMKY and ME 

25 



BIOTROPIA NO. 21, 2003 
 

 
 
1% + SMKY media were used to study their effects on the growth (based on dry weight of 
mycelia) and aflatoxin production of toxigenic A. flavus. 

The kind of culture filtrates of test fungi on the growth of toxigenic A. flavus on SMKY 
media was significantly different. Conidial concentration of test fungi and the interaction between the 
kind of the culture filtrates and conidial concentrations were not significantly different. The 
percentage of growth inhibition of toxigenic A. flavus caused by culture filtrate of A. niger 
(72.51%) was higher than that of nontoxigenic A. flavus (45.62%). On ME 1% + SMKY medium, 
culture filtrates and conidial concentration of test fungi, and their interaction were not 
significantly different. Nevertheless, the percentage of growth inhibition of toxigenic A. flavus 
caused by culture filtrate of A. niger (68.68%) was higher than that of nontoxigenic A. flavus 
(64.0%). 



Antagonistic effect of three fungal isolates - Okky S. Dharmaputra  et al. 

The inhibition percentage of aflatoxin B, production caused by culture filtrate derived from 
nontoxigenic A, flavus grown on SMKY medium (41.67%) was not significantly different with that 
of ME 1% + SMKY medium (58.33%). 

Culture filtrate derived from A. niger either grown on SMKY or ME 1% + SMKY media 
completely inhibited aflatoxin production effectively (100%) (Table 7). Culture filtrate of T. 
harzianum grown on the two media also completely inhibited aflatoxin BI production up to 100% 
(Table 7), but also stimulated the growth of toxigenic A. flavus (Table 6). 

The kind of culture filtrates derived from test fungi and conidial concentration of test fungi and 
their interaction gave significantly different effects on the percent inhibition of aflatoxin 
production using SMKY medium. On ME 1% + SMKY medium, the kind of culture filtrates of 
the test fungi gave very significantly different effect on aflatoxin B) production, while conidial 
concentrations and the interaction between kind of culture filtrates and conidial concentrations 
were not significantly different. 

Culture filtrates derived from A. niger with the concentrations of 1x106, 2xl06 and 3xl06 
conidia/ml grown on SMKY medium inibited aflatoxin Bt production up to 100% (Table 8). The 
percent inhibition of aflatoxin B, production increased with the increase of conidial concentrations 
of nontoxigenic A. flavus. The culture filtrate of nontoxigenic A. flavus with the concentration of 
1x106 conidia/ml was not significantly different with that of 2x106 conidia/ml against the inhibition 
percentage of aflatoxin Bj production, while that of 3xl06 conidia/ml was significantly different. 

The culture filtrate derived from A niger grown on ME 1% + SMKY medium inhibited 
aflatoxin B] production higher (100.00%) than that of nontoxigenic A. flavus (56.25%). 

Aflatoxins produced by the most potential test fungal isolate were confirmed by using High 
Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Two kinds of aflatoxins (Bi and G|) were found 
using this method. 

27 



BIOTROPIA NO. 21,2003 

 

 

 

 

 

The results of test of antagonism using direct confrontation showed that SMKYA 
medium was the best medium for antagonism study between toxigenic A. flavus either with 
nontoxigenic A. flavus, A. niger or T. harzianum. This is because the highest percentage of growth 
inhibition of toxigenic 'A. flavus caused by the three test fungal isolates occurred on SMKYA 
medium (Table 3). On SMKYA medium the highest percentage of growth inhibition of toxigenic 
A. flavus was caused by T. harzianum followed by A. niger, while the lowest was caused by 
nontoxigenic A. flavus (Table 4). However, the results of test of antagonism study using 
indirect confrontation showed that the culture filtrate derived from T. harzianum grown on SMKY 
medium stimulated the growth of toxigenic A. flavus (Table 6). Therefore, A. niger was the most 
potential test fungus in inhibiting the growth and aflatoxin B, production of toxigenic A. flavus, 
either on agar media or on culture filtrates of the test fungi. 

Confirmation of aflatoxin contents produced by toxigenic A. flavus grown on culture filtrate 
of A. niger cultivated on SMKY and ME 1% + SMKY is presented in Table 9. The results showed 
that there were differences in aflatoxin BI contents analyzed using TLC and HPLC methods, 
because different methods could have different results. Nevertheless, based on the two 
methods used, culture filtrates derived from A. niger cultivated either on SMKY or ME 1% + 
SMKY liquid media with different conidial concentrations completely inhibited aflatoxin B] 
production of toxigenic A. flavus. 

28 



Antagonistic effect of three fungal isolates - Okky S. Dharmaputra  et  al. 

Table  9.  Aflatoxin Bj contents produced by toxigenic A. flavus grown on culture filtrate derived from A. niger cultivated on                        
SMKY and ME 1% + SMKY liquid media with various conidial concentrations. 

 
Aflatoxin Bl 

       
content (ppb) 

   
Conidial concen 
tration of A. niger  
   (conidia/ml) 

             
                    
                 Media 
 TLC method HPLC method 

1 x 106

 
Culture filtrate (using SMKY) 0 0

Control (SMKY) 160 97.57 
 Culture filtrate (using ME 1% + SMKY)

 
0 
 

0 
 

 Control (ME 1% + SMKY) 120 60.79
2x10" Culture filtrate (using SMKY) 0 0

Control (SMKY) 160 98.89 
 Culture filtrate (using ME 1% + SMKY)

 
0 
 

0 
 

 Control (ME 1% + SMKY) 120 69.37
3x 10' Culture filtrate (using SMKY) 0 0

Control (SMKY) 160 103.58 
 Culture filtrate (using ME 1 % + SMKY)

 
0 
 

0 
 

 Control (ME 1% + SMKY) 120 73.68

TLC = Thin Layer Chromatography; HPLC = High Performance Liquid Chromatography 

CONCLUSIONS 

The type of interactions between toxigenic A. flavus either with nontoxigenic A. flavus or 
with T. harzianum was B type, respectively. In this type of interaction, mutual inhibition on 
contact or space between the test fungi and toxigenic A. flavus was small (< 2 mm). The type of 
interactions between toxigenic A. flavus and A. niger depended on the kind of media. On SMKYA 
and MEA 1% + SMKYA media, the interactions were B type, while on PDA and MEA 1% media, 
it was D type. In this D type of interaction, toxigenic A. flavus and A. niger inhibited each other 
(mutual inhibition) at a distance > 2mm. 

Culture filtrates derived from nontoxigenic A. flavus and A. niger grown on ME 1%, SMKY 
and ME 1% + SMKY inhibited mycelial growth (based on dry weight) of toxigenic A. flavus, 
except those derived from T. harzianum grown on SMKY and ME 1% + SMKY media which 
stimulated the growth of toxigenic A. flavus. 

29 



BIOTROPIA NO. 21,2003 

The culture filtrates of nontoxigenic A. flavus, A. niger and T. harzianum inhibited aflatoxin 
BI production of toxigenic A. flavus. The culture filtrates of A. niger and T. harzianum with the 
conidial concentrations of 1x106, 2xl06 and 3xl06 per ml could inhibit aflatoxin B] production up to 
100%. The percent inhibition of aflatoxin B, production increased with an increase of conidial 
concentrations of nontoxigenic A. flavus. The highest percent inhibition of aflatoxin B\ production 
(62.5%) was obtained from the conidial concentration of 3x106 per ml. 

Aspergillus niger was the most potential fungus in inhibiting the growth of toxigenic A. 
flavus, either on agar media or on culture filtrates of the test fungi. The culture filtrate of A. niger 
was also the most potential filtrate in inhibiting aflatoxin BI production of toxigenic A. flavus. 

The results of this study gave important informations on antagonistic effect of three fungal 
isolates (nontoxigenic A. flavus, A. niger and T. harzianum) before they could be used to control 
aflatoxin-producing A. flavus in peanuts grown under green-house and field conditions. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Indonesia. We 
also thank the technicians of the Plant Pathology Laboratory, SEAMEO BIOTROP, who have in 
one way or another contributed to this research. 

REFERENCES 

Bainton, S.J., R.D. Coker, B.D. Jones, E.M. Morley, M.J. Nagler, R.L. Turner. 1980. Mycotoxin Training Manual. Tropical 
Products Institut (TPI), London. 

Dennis, C and J. Webster. 1971. Antagonistic properties of species groups of Trichoderma. III. Hyphal interaction. Trans. 
Brit. Mucol. Soc. 57: 363 - 369. 

Dharmaputra, O.S., A.S.R. Putri, I. Retnowati and S. Ambarwati. 2001. Soil mycobiota of peanut fields at Wonogiri regency, 
Central Java: their effect on the growth and aflatoxin production of Aspergillus flavus in vitro. BIOTROPIA No. 17: 
30 - 59. 

Dorner, J.W., R.J. Cole and P.D. Blankenship. 1992. Use of a biocompetitive agent to control preharvest aflatoxin in drought 
stressed peanuts. Journal of Food Protection 55 (11): 888 - 892. 

FAO and WHO. 1999. Codex Aliraentarius Commision. Food Standard Programme. Report of the 23'd Session, Rome, 28 
June - 3 July 1999. Food Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization, Rome, Italy. 

Fokkema, N.J. 1973. The role of saprophytic fungi in antagonism against Dreschslera sorokiniana (Helminthosporium 
sativum) on agar plates and on rye leaves with pollen. Physiological Plant Pathology 3: 195-205. 

Gourama, H. and L.B. Bullerman. 1995. Inhibiton of growth and aflatoxin production of Aspergillus flavus by 
Lactobacillus sp. J. Food Protection 58 (11) 1249 - 1256. 

30 



Antagonistic effect of three fungal isolates - Okky S. Dharmaputra  et  al. 

Jeffries, P. and T.W.K. Young. 1994. Interfungal Parasitic Relationship. CAB International, Wallingford. 

Magan, N. and J. Lacey. 1984. The effect of water activity, temperature and substrate on interaction between 
field and storage fungi. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 92: 83 - 93. 

Park, D.L. 1993. Controlling aflatoxin in food and feed. Food Technology 47 (10): 92 - 96. 

Pitt, J.I. 1999. Controlling aflatoxins in peanuts by competitive exclusion of toxigenic fungi. In: Dietzgen, R.G. (ed). 
Elimination of Aflatoxin Contamination in Peanut, pp. 21 -22. ACIAR Proceedings No. 89, Canberra. 

Pitt, J.I. and A.D. Hocking. 1996. Current knowledge of fungi and mycotoxins associated with food 
commodities in Southeast Asia. In: Highley, E. and G.I. Johnson (eds). Mycotoxin Contamination in Grains, 
pp. 5 -10. ACIAR Technical Reports 37, Canberra. 

Pitt, J.I., S.K. Dyer and S. McCammon. 1991. Systemic invasion of developing peanut plants by 
Aspergillusflavus. Letters in Applied Microbiology 13: 16 - 20. 

Rodriguez, S.B and N.E. Mahoney. 1994. Inhibition of aflatoxin production by surfactants. Applied and 
Environmental Microbiology 60 (1): 106 - 110. 

Wheeler, K.A. and A.D. Hocking. 1993. Interactions among xerophilic fungi associated with dried salted fish. J. Appl. 
Bacteriology 74: 164 - 169. 

31 


	19.pdf
	20.pdf
	21.pdf
	22.pdf
	23.pdf
	24.pdf
	25.pdf
	26.pdf
	27.pdf
	28.pdf
	29.pdf
	30.pdf
	31.pdf