id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
biht-440	Hinkel, Jennifer M; Cali, PhD, Umit	Introducing BHTY’s AI Policy for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors	2025	3	.pdf	application/pdf	1642	60	22	: University of Oxford Catalog of Bias.2 3. Data Privacy and Security Compliance The following actions are high risk for privacy and se- curity compliance: • Uploading protected health information (PHI) to any AI system • Sharing proprietary blockchain implementations or sensitive code with AI systems • Using AI tools hosted outside permitted jurisdictions without explicit data agreements • Processing patient data through public or commercial AI platforms • Sharing institutional or collaborative partner confiden- tial information • Sharing BHTY journal confidential information using public AI systems and sending to systems hosted out- side permitted jurisdictions, including uploading confi- dential submissions to commercially available AI tools without privacy protections Required Safeguards: • Use only AI tools with appropriate data handling certifi- cations that you have evaluated and verified as a researcher • Implement local AI solutions (i.e. on your own server or computer) when processing sensitive data • Introducing BHTY’s AI Policy for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors • Submitting AI-generated or AI-derived content that is not verified, e.g. references that do not exist, or refer- ences that do not reflect the cited material • Submitting AI-generated content as original work without human oversight/verification • Using AI for peer review activities or editorial decisions in lieu of careful human expert review and feedback • Generating fake data, references, or experimental results, including the generation of synthetic data for analysis without clear indication of AI use • Creating fabricated case studies or patient scenarios • Bypassing human oversight in critical analysis or conclusions • Plagiarism through undisclosed AI assistance • Fabrication of research findings using AI • Falsification of methodology descriptions • Misrepresentation of AI capabilities or limitations • Failure to disclose AI use when required Editorial Review Process The editorial team acknowledges that no “AI Detection” tools have been demonstrated to have a high level of valid- ity.	cache/biht-440.pdf	txt/biht-440.txt