BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience 
ISSN: 2068-0473  |  e-ISSN: 2067-3957 
Covered in: Web of Science (WOS); PubMed.gov; IndexCopernicus; The Linguist List; Google Academic; Ulrichs; getCITED; 

Genamics JournalSeek; J-Gate; SHERPA/RoMEO; Dayang Journal System; Public Knowledge Project; BIUM; NewJour;  

ArticleReach Direct; Link+; CSB; CiteSeerX; Socolar; KVK; WorldCat; CrossRef; Ideas RePeC; Econpapers; Socionet. 
 

2021, Volume 12, Issue 4, pages: 80-93 | https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/239  

 
 

Cognitive and 
Emotional 
Components of the 
Inner Picture of an 
Individual Experience 
in Terms of a 
Pandemic 
Yuliia RYBINSKA¹,  
Oleksandra LOSHENKO2,  
Nataliia POHORILSKA3,  
Maryna ANTONIVSKA4,  
Nataliia SARNOVSKA5,  
Olha SHUM6 
 

1 Doctor of Science (Dr. Hab) in Education, 
Professor, Head of Foreign Philology Department, 
Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, 
Kyiv, Ukraine, julialeo1619@gmail.com, 
orcid.org/0000-0003-2185-7890   
2 PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, 
Department of Experimental and Applied 
Psychology, Taras Shevchenko National University 
of Kyiv, Ukraine, psiholog3003@gmail.com, 
orcid.org/0000-0002-3303-3162  
3 PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, 
Department of General Psychology, Taras 
Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine, 
pogorilska_n@ukr.net, orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-
1624   
4 Lecturer, Department of Foreign Philology, Kyiv 
National University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv, 
Ukraine, antonivska_maryna@ukr.net, 
orcid.org/0000-0002-4451-3735   
5 Lecturer, Department of Foreign Philology, Kyiv 
National University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv, 
Ukraine, nat_sarnovskaya@ukr.net,  
orcid.org/0000-0001-7278-5183 
6 PhD in Philological Science, Associate Professor, 
Department of Foreign Philology, Kyiv National 
University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv, Ukraine, 
oshym@ukr.net, orcid.org/0000-0002-4638-843X

 

Abstract: The epidemic threat of COVID-19 has changed the socio-
psychological situation in general and has become a serious test for both 
Ukrainian society and the whole of humanity. The purpose of this 
research was to study the psychological characteristics of emotional 
experiences and behavioral strategies in pandemic conditions. The study 
involved 85 people aged 22 to 60, residents of Ukraine. In the research, 
the participants of the study used Diener et al. Satisfaction with Life 
Scale (SWSL) (1985), adapted by D. Leontiev & Osin (2020), the 
method of SPANA (equivalent to the method of PANAS (Positive 
and Negative Affect Schedule), adapted by E. Osin, Attitude to a 
significant life situation, a method by E. Korzhova and A. Berdnikova. 
The study identified both negative and positive changes caused by the 
threat of a pandemic. Among the negative consequences, the respondents 
most often indicated anxiety and fears, among the positive ones – 
personal growth, strengthening family relationships, and others. The 
research also provides data on the life satisfaction level and outlines the 
behavioral strategies, which Ukrainians choose in a rapidly changing 
environment. Thus, the majority of Ukrainians, namely 27% of the 
sample, take a passive position on the prevailing conditions, feeling 
powerless and helpless. 

 
Keywords: COVID-19; emotional experiences; life satisfaction; 
anxiety; fear; behavioral strategy. 
 

How to cite: Rybinska, Y., Loshenko, O., Pohorilska, N., 
Antonivska, M., Sarnovska, N., & Shum, O. (2021). Cognitive 
and Emotional Components of the Inner Picture of an 

Individual Experience in Terms of a Pandemic. BRAIN. Broad 
Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(4), 80-93. 
https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/239  

https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/239
mailto:julialeo1619@gmail.com
mailto:psiholog3003@gmail.com
mailto:pogorilska_n@ukr.net
mailto:antonivska_maryna@ukr.net
mailto:nat_sarnovskaya@ukr.net
mailto:oshym@ukr.net
https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/239


BRAIN. Broad Research in                                                             December, 2021 
Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience                                      Volume 12, Issue 4 

 

81 

Introduction 

The 21st century has brought to the lives of people worldwide not 
only rapid scientific and technological progress but also several negative 
events. Among them are the challenges of a global pandemic. Present-day 
living conditions in the context of COVID-19 pandemic, accompanied by 
changes in the socio-economic situation, and increase in the information 
load lead to the formation of intrapersonal and interpersonal contradictions 
among members of society, an increase in anxiety, insecurity, a sense of 
uncertainty in the future, and a loss of the activity prospect. People around 
the world have no idea what awaits them and what to hope for. Three main 
questions hang in the air: “How to live now?”, “When will it all end?”, “Will 
everything be as it was before?”. These, at first glance, concise questions make 
our heart beat faster, feel anxiety, devastation, fatigue, and the like. Most do 
not tolerate the uncertainty caused by pandemic conditions. The real threat 
to the whole planet population is an increase in the number of suicidal 
disorders. This was the reason for our study, the purpose of which was to 
study the psychological characteristics of personality experiences and 
behavioral strategies in a pandemic threat. 

In 2020, several studies were conducted that examined the 
psychological aspects of the pandemic consequences. Notably, it is noted 
that the uncertainty situation has led to an increase in the number of 
depressive disorders (Wang et al., 2020), as well as such negative reactions as 
anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder (Kumar & Somani, 2020). Studies 
have also noted the impact of quarantine restrictions, which mainly lead to 
post-traumatic stress and sleep disorders (Liu et al., 2020). In particular, the 
study reveals that the rate of post-traumatic stress was four times higher in 
children who were in quarantine than in those who were not. Also 
informative is research conducted by Roy and colleagues in India (Roy et al. 
2020) to examine the anxiety level and sleep problems in pandemic 
conditions. It was found that 12% of people had sleep disorders of diverse 
nature, and the anxiety level indicator was elevated. Thanks to these studies, 
we already have an array of data that allows us to assume that the conditions 
of a pandemic threat adversely affect the mental state of the person.  

Methods and materials 

The research team of the Faculty of Psychology of the Taras 
Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, together with the scientific 
team of the Department of Foreign Philology of Kyiv National 



Cognitive and Emotional Components of the Inner Picture of an Individual … 
Yuliia RYBINSKA, et al. 

 

82 

University of Culture and Arts, conducted an online survey of the 
population of Ukraine in connection with COVID-19. The study involved 
85 people aged 22 to 60, residents of Ukraine. In the research, we used E. 
Diener et al. (1985) Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWSL), adapted by Osin 
& Leontiev (2020). The method includes five questions, which involve the 
choice of the answer on a seven-point scale. The scale measures the 
cognitive assessment of the life circumstances compliance with the 
individual expectations and reflects a general measure of internal harmony 
and psychological satisfaction. The emotional component of life satisfaction 
was studied through the frequency of the level of positive emotions and 
negative affects using the technique of SPANA/ШПАНА (equivalent to 
the method of PANAS (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule) (Osin, 
2012). The subjects are asked to note the severity of 20 adjectives revealing 
various psycho-emotional states. The result of this technique is two poles: 
positive emotional feelings and negative emotional affects. The study also 
used the “Attitude to a significant life situation”, a method by E. 
Korzhova and A. Berdnikova which is designed to identify the specifics of 
human interaction with the life situation (Korzhova & Berdnikova, 2016). 
Several statements were brought to the attention of the people under the 
research. In the first part, it was necessary to provide a detailed answer to 
the question. The second part reveals the degree of agreement with the 
proposed statements. The study situation is the quarantine situation 
(currently adaptive) in the conditions of the COVID 19 pandemic. Such an 
instruction allowed the experimenters, in no way, to direct attention to a 
specific aspect, to get an actual picture of the respondents' experiences and 
thoughts regarding the current situation. 

Results 

According to the results presented in Table 1, most often describing 
the importance of the situation, the respondents indicated fear, anxiety for 
their health (14% of the answers), and the health of their loved ones (8%). 
Slightly fewer – 18% of answers told about the positive changes in their 
lives, which became possible both through the pandemic and the 
introduction of quarantine restrictions to limit the incidence. For example, 
these are the answers: “For me, this is a time when I can save money on travel and 
finally buy a car and make repairs in the apartment”, “Because I spend more time with 
my husband, as he has to work from home, and, thanks to staying at home for a long 
time, we had the opportunity to take a puppy”, “My husband and I became even closer, as 
well as the whole family”, “Made me slow down and look around”, etc. The answers 
often include the idea that life used to seem different and people often 



BRAIN. Broad Research in                                                             December, 2021 
Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience                                      Volume 12, Issue 4 

 

83 

wanted something different, but now it is important to maintain health, life. 
“This situation made me stop (in terms of life functionality) and think about what I have 
and how I want to live my life. This is when you have everything and nothing at the same 
time. You live, do what you want, go where you want, and at one moment, everything is 
taken away, and nothing is allowed, and at that moment came the realization that you 
need to stop and start living a real present, not the phantom future”. 

Table 1 - Frequency analysis of a situation description 

№ Category Frequency of 
occurrence, % 

1 Negative experiences, fears 
for loved ones 

14 
8 (total 22) 

2 Values reassessment 18 

3 Experiencing restrictions 13 

4 Discovering other options and opportunities 13 

5 Important for everyone 12 

6 Global changes 11 

7 Business and economy destruction 7 

8 Nothing has changed in my life 4 

 
13% of respondents noted the restrictions as the most important 

aspect of the pandemic situation. These restrictions concern both the 
possibilities of travel, shopping, social activities, and answers such as “my 
freedom is limited”. 

13% of responses reveal the pleasure of new opportunities that 
began to open up both in the macro world and in internal priorities and 
values. “The pandemic forced me to reconsider priorities, adapt to the 
new, and I opened up loads of opportunities for myself,” “Gave 
direction for new development,” “I realized that you could have a job 
that does not depend on the location” and the like. 

12% of the respondents agreed with the importance of the situation 
that arose but did not specify why exactly the situation was serious. 

11% of those studied indicated in their responses the globality of the 
changes caused by the COVID 19 pandemic. For example, “For me, this is 
a period of great change. We all learn to live in a new way and 
according to new rules”, “New realities that dictate new rules,” etc. 
7% of respondents complained about the economic destruction, the 
complexity of small and medium-sized businesses, whose activities ceased or 
suspended due to quarantine restrictions. And only 4% of the respondents 
indicated in their answers that the pandemic situation, quarantine restrictions 
are not significant to them. 



Cognitive and Emotional Components of the Inner Picture of an Individual … 
Yuliia RYBINSKA, et al. 

 

84 

In total, only 2% of the sample refused to answer the question on 
the pandemic situation, namely, why the pandemic situation arises. 
Accordingly, 98% tried to determine the causes. Thus, the respondents most 
often (26% of the sample) claimed that the pandemic and quarantine 
situation is essential to someone: “because someone needs it,” “political 
games,” “because it is a business” and so on. The same percentage of 
the sample (26%) revealed the cause of quarantine restrictions, as the fear of 
multiple deaths, the desire to protect humanity from the intensive spread of 
the virus. 11% of the sample noted that pandemics appear periodically and 
are pretty logical. 9% of the sample saw in the ferocity of coronavirus 
infection the wrong actions of humanity, as a whole, these are incorrect 
values, disrespect for nature, and, accordingly, global warming, as a result of 
people's wrong actions. 8% of the sample as the cause of the pandemic 
indicated the virus novelty and the doctors' inability to repel the disease 
quickly. And 1% of the researchers indicated that we would never know the 
truthful cause of the pandemic.  

 (See Fig. 1) 
 

 

Evaluating their actions, some of the subjects felt the complexity. 
4% of the sample indicated that they “find it difficult to answer this question.” 8% 
in response to the question “What part did you take in the situation under study” 
indicated that “did not take,” and 6.5% indicated that took “none” 
participation. 10% of the sample indicated their “passive” role without 
specifying. 

Irresponsibility 
of people17% 

Someone's 
benefit27% 

Rapid spread 
of the 

disease26% 

Epidemics are 
periodical 11% 

The fault of 
mankind 9% 

Refusal to 
respond 2% 

No one would 
ever know 1% 



BRAIN. Broad Research in                                                             December, 2021 
Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience                                      Volume 12, Issue 4 

 

85 

9% of the sample indicated active participation: “helped the company to 
switch to remote work format,” “provided antiseptics and personal protective equipment to 
vulnerable groups,” etc. 1.5% of the sample indicated that they “just were doing 
their business.”  And the largest percentage of the sample (61%) presented the 
answers typical for isolation and self-isolation due to the pandemic: “I 
follow all the recommendations and stay at home,” “I adhere to all the 
rules and requirements” and the like.  

Revealing the consequences of the pandemic, 46.5% of respondents 
indicated negative consequences, 42.5% saw positive ones, and 11% of 
respondents indicated neutral changes in their lives. Qualitative analysis of 
negative impacts showed that most often (53% of negative consequences) 
changes were manifested in the appearance of anxiety, fears, and a sense of 
hopelessness. One subject pointed out that he felt acute fear of getting out 
when quarantine was relieved. 23.5% of respondents complained about 
losses due to the pandemic and the closure of borders: job loss in another 
country, obstacles to change the country of residence, abandonment of 
important events, etc. 17.5% of the sample faced financial constraints and 
losses. And 6% of respondents complained about the shrinking time 
perspective and difficulties in building long-term plans. 

Among the positive results, the respondents indicated positive life 
changes (31% of all answers with positive consequences), personal growth, 
awareness of their resources (22%), time-release for themselves and their 
needs (18%), strengthening family relations (16%) and familiarity with online 
opportunities (13% of answers). 

19% of the study sample believe that after the end of the pandemic 
(one subject hopes for a vaccine), life will return to “pre-COVID” life, and 
people will quickly forget about this disease. 81% of respondents believe 
that life has already changed, and these changes will remain with them either 
for a long time or forever. Most often, it was simply stated that changes 
would be made, but some responses were detailed. Consequently, 16% of 
answers about changes note their personal changes, which the subjects no 
longer want to get rid of, also 16% of responses indicate adaptability to such 
situations in the future, 10% of responses note fear of social contacts, 8% 
are afraid of a global economic crisis, 6.5% complain about boundary 
restrictions, and another 6.5% indicate that now, online forms of work 
would be preferred where possible. 

 
 
 
 



Cognitive and Emotional Components of the Inner Picture of an Individual … 
Yuliia RYBINSKA, et al. 

 

86 

Statement Average Standard 
Deviation 

Everything in my power 1.60 .89 

Not so much depends on me 1.44 1.00 

It is good that everything happened that way. For 
me, this is a valuable experience 

1.25 1.04 

That should not have happened to me .87 .91 

There is nothing difficult for me in the situation 1,52 .94 

The situation seems very complicated to me 1.79         .98 

I believe that everything will be great 2.41 .81 

I doubt that this will lead to anything good 1.09 .87 

I take an active part 1.23 .86 

I do not play an important role 1.60 .97 

 
The evaluation was performed using a four-point scale from 0 to 3, 

where 0 is the indicator of absolute disagreement with the statement, and 3 
is the maximum degree of agreement. According to the results obtained, the 
highest rating (with a low standard deviation) had the statement “I believe that 
everything will be great,” which indicates the positive attitude of our subjects, 
optimism. A more positive view of the situation is confirmed by the 
agreement degree with the statements included in the parameter “optimism-
pessimism,” in particular: “I believe that everything will be great” (m = 2.41; σ = 
0.81) and “I doubt that this will lead to anything good” (m = 1.09; σ = 0.87). 

The statement “that should not have happened to me” received the lowest 
score, which may indicate our subjects' acceptance of a pandemic situation 
caused by COVID 19. This assumption confirms the general assessment of 
the statements, the methodology authors attributed to the “acceptance-
rejection” pole, namely: “It is good that everything happened that way. For 
me, this is a valuable experience” (m = 1.25; σ = 1.04) and “it should not have 
happened to me” (m = 0.87; σ = 0.91). Low levels of agreement with these 
statements indicate a generally faster positive emotional attitude to the 
situation. 

Degrees of agreement with the parameter statements “ease – 
complexity” “There is nothing difficult for me in the situation” (m = 1.52; σ = 0.94) 
and “The situation does not seem very simple" (m = 1.79; σ = 0.98) reveal the 
difficulty in unambiguous assessment. Most likely, the situation seems 
difficult for the subjects, but the above-described optimism helps to reduce 
this complexity. 

The same ambiguity appeared when answering the statement to the 
parameter “internality-externality”: “The situation depends on me. Everything in my 
power” (m = 1.6; σ = 0.89) and “Not so much depends on me. This is how the 



BRAIN. Broad Research in                                                             December, 2021 
Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience                                      Volume 12, Issue 4 

 

87 

circumstances turned out” (m = 1.44; σ = 1). It is likely that already at this stage, 
the respondents perceive the situation of the pandemic as one that can be 
controlled by them. 

And the parameter “activity – passivity” covered the statement “I take an 
active part” (m = 1.23; σ = 0.86) and “I do not play an important role” (m = 1.6; σ = 
0,97). According to the answers, there is a slight predominance of the pole of 
passivity. It is likely that quarantine situations, which continue to apply to 
many spheres of life, are perceived by the subjects as limiting their activity. 

Factor analysis of the above statements revealed their semantic 
combination for the studied sample. The expediency of factor analysis is 
indicated by the values of the KMO index (0.719) and Bartlett’s Test of 
Sphericity (0.000). Due to factor analysis, four factors were identified, which 
together covered 64% of the variance. To obtain more or less uniform filling 
factors, we used the rotation of Quartimax. 

 
Statement Components 

1 2 3 

Not so much depends on me .833   

Everything in my power -.811   

That should not have happened to me .588   

The situation seems very complicated to me .582   

It is good that everything happened that way. For 
me, this is a valuable experience 

-.562   

I doubt that this will lead to anything good  -.771  

There is nothing difficult for me in the situation  .767  

I believe that everything will be great  .672  

I take an active part   .846 

I do not play an important role   -.756 

 
Three factors were obtained. The first factor, which explained 27% 

of the variance, combined five statements: “Not so much depends on me” 
(0.833), “Everything in my power” (-0.811), “It should not have happened to me” 
(0.588), “The situation seems very complicated to me” (0.582) and “It is good that 
everything happened that way. For me, this is a valuable experience” (-0.562). These 
statements reveal feelings of helplessness, powerlessness, rejection of the 
pandemic situation. 

The second factor, which explained 21% of the total variance, 
included statements that studied “I doubt that this will lead to anything good”  
(-0.771), “there is nothing difficult for me in the situation” (0.767), and “I believe that 



Cognitive and Emotional Components of the Inner Picture of an Individual … 
Yuliia RYBINSKA, et al. 

 

88 

everything will be great” (0.672). This factor included positive emotional 
experiences of the subjects. 

The third factor (16% of the total variance) combined the statements 
“I take an active part” (0.846) and “I do not play an important role” (-0.756), which 
indicates a behavioral strategy to overcome feelings about the COVID-19 
pandemic. 

Next, we consider the results of the life satisfaction study of the 
sample under research. We identified three levels of life satisfaction: low, 
medium, and high. According to the obtained results, the most among the 
studied people with a high degree of life satisfaction - 49.3 samples. In the 
studied sample, the lowest number of people is with a low level of life 
satisfaction - 9.3%. And, accordingly, individuals with an average satisfaction 
level is 41, 3% of the subjects' sample. 
 

Statement question Sample 
covariance 

Standard 
Deviation 

In many ways, my life corresponds to my 
ideal 

4.24 1.14 

The conditions of my life are wonderful 5.17 1.06 

I am satisfied with my life 5.06 1.04 

I achieved almost everything I wanted in 
my life 

3.9 1.19 

If I had the opportunity to live my life 
again, I would not change almost anything 
in it. 

4.31 1.36 

 

Analysis of the answers sample covariance showed that most of our 
subjects are satisfied with living conditions and their lives in general. But the 
least they are satisfied with their achievements and need more 
accomplishments. Accordingly, according to these results, we can say that 
for people with a high level of life satisfaction, the subjective perception of 
the current life situation as prosperous is more important than the 
correspondence of the life of the subjective ideal. 

Thus, it is possible to claim that the subjects of our sample are 
generally satisfied with their lives, live in psychologically comfortable 
conditions, have a strong interest in life as the opposite of apathy, show 
determination, commitment, consistency in achieving life goals; coherence 
between set and actually achieved goals; positive assessment of one's 
qualities and actions and the general positive mood background. 

It was determined that life-satisfied subjects, often revealing their 
degree of agreement with the statements described above, chose the average 



BRAIN. Broad Research in                                                             December, 2021 
Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience                                      Volume 12, Issue 4 

 

89 

estimates of consent with the statement “do not play an important 
role,” and those with low levels of life satisfaction most often agreed as 
much as possible that they do not play an important role in the current 
situation (score Phi = 0.418, Cramera V 0.296 at p = 0.041). There is likely a 
clarification of the life satisfaction concept: a person with a low level of 
satisfaction reacts more sharply to time constraints. 

The next stage of the study was the analysis of the dominant 
emotional experiences of the sample under study. As noted above, PANAS 
(in Russian adaptation of SPANA/ШПАНА) has been used for this purpose. 
We analyzed the results according to the principle provided in the 
methodology. That is, we determined the indicators of positive and negative 
effects. Also, factor analysis was used to clarify the emotional experiences of 
the respondents, which helped to understand the internal picture of the 
experiences. 

Adjectives were grouped into four factors that generally explained 
the 67.52% of the variance. The feasibility indicators of the factor are 0.821 
KMO, respectively, and Bartlett’s statistical significance is 0.000. 

 
Adjectives Components 

1 2 3 4 

anxious .856    

restless .854    

angry .825    

nervous .824    

irritated .814    

scared .684    

depressed .666    

upset .594    

inspired  .839   

enthusiastic  .836   

interested  .727   

confident  .675   

active  .604   

full  .530   

joyful  .527   

attentive   .848  

focused   .745  

decisive   .539  

guilty    .900 

embarrassed    .789 



Cognitive and Emotional Components of the Inner Picture of an Individual … 
Yuliia RYBINSKA, et al. 

 

90 

The first factor includes adjectives that fill the negative factor of 
feelings: anxious (0.856), restless (0.854), angry (0.825), nervous (0.824), 
irritated (0.814), scared (0.684), depressed (0.666), upset (0.594)). Thus, the 
first factor can be called the “negative pole,” where the dominant is 
anxious, restless, and angry. 

The second factor includes adjectives that belong to the positive pole 
of emotional experiences: inspired (0.839), enthusiastic (0.836), interested 
(0.727), confident (0.675), active (0.604), full (0.530) and joyful (0.527). You 
can call the factor “positive emotions” with a predominance of inspiration and 
admiration. 

The third factor includes such adjectives as attentive (0.848), focused 
(0.745), and decisive (0.539). This factor can be called the factor of attention. 

Finally, the fourth factor combines two adjectives: guilty (0.900) and 
embarrassed (0.789). This factor is called the guilt factor. 

Analysis of the arithmetic mean sample revealed the dominance of 
the positive pole of experiences (m = 33.12; σ = 6.9) over negative affects 
(m = 20.23; σ = 7.46). Analysis of the arithmetic mean of the samples 
according to the estimates of the expression degree of each adjective 
emotion revealed leaders: decisive (m = 3.48), enthusiastic (m = 3.41), active 
and focused (both received an average score of 3.37), focused (m = 3.36) 
and attentive (m = 3.28). According to the subjects' assessments, emotions-
experiences were the least expressed: embarrassed (1.24), guilty (1.33), angry 
(1.81), and scared (1.85). 

Discussions 

Recent events, namely the pandemic threat and quarantine 
restrictions, have significantly changed the socio-psychological situation of 
Ukrainians and caused numerous changes that have had both negative and 
positive effects (Pohorilska, 2021). This study is aimed at studying the 
subjective experiences of Ukrainian, namely their qualitative component in 
pandemic conditions. Attention is paid to the study of the behavioral aspect 
in complex life realities. The empirical study obtained results on the life 
satisfaction level and revealed its content. 

The pandemic and quarantine restrictions have highlighted the 
experiences that characterize a situation of uncertainty (Skotnikova et al., 
2020). Conducted empirical study shows that during the period of adaptive 
quarantine in a pandemic threat, most Ukrainian people worry about their 
health (14%). The second place is occupied by fears for the health of 
relatives, 8% of the sample. In general, health anxiety covers 22% of 
respondents. However, in the course of our research, it turned out that 



BRAIN. Broad Research in                                                             December, 2021 
Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience                                      Volume 12, Issue 4 

 

91 

Ukrainians observed not only the negative consequences of being in a 
situation of long-term danger to health and life in general. 18% of 
respondents felt pleasure through positive changes in their lives thanks to a 
value reassessment. Researchers noted that the pandemic threat situation 
opened up new opportunities for respondents and gave direction for further 
development. A significant proportion of those investigated complained and 
felt dissatisfied because of the restrictions that were imposed during adaptive 
quarantine. In total, 13% of respondents were dissatisfied with the 
restriction of social activity and perceived this as an attack on their freedom. 
Only 4% of the sample considered the situation due to the pandemic, and 
the restrictions that were imposed are not important. Qualitative analysis of 
the pandemic threat consequences showed that respondents' responses to 
the positive and negative consequences were divided almost equally. Thus, 
46.5% of respondents noted negative changes, while 42.5% of respondents 
indicated positive changes. Among the negative consequences were mostly 
the appearance of anxiety, fears, feelings of hopelessness. Among the 
positive changes, 22% of the sample indicated the possibility of personal 
growth and awareness of own potential. A significant part of the sample 
(18%) noted the free time as a positive factor that contributed to meeting 
their needs. For 16% of the sample, experiencing a situation of uncertainty 
led to family strengthening. Enrichment of experience as a positive change 
was reflected in 13% of responses through acquaintance and mastery of 
online opportunities. 

As part of the pandemic threat situation, data were obtained on the 
degree of satisfaction with the life of Ukrainians. Three degrees with high, 
medium, and low levels of satisfaction were identified, respectively. It should 
be noted that in a difficult situation, the majority of respondents (49.3%) 
showed a high level of satisfaction from life. Among them, the respondents 
are most satisfied with life in general and their living conditions. The average 
assessment of life satisfaction was found in 41.3% of the sample. The lowest 
percentage was given to the low level. Namely, 9.3% of respondents were 
dissatisfied with their lives. 

As a result of factor analysis, we obtained three behavioral strategies 
that were characteristic of respondents in adaptive quarantine. For most 
responses, which is 27% of the variance, the behavioral strategy of the 
passive type prevails, which is expressed in experiences of helplessness, 
powerlessness, and anticipation of a change in the current situation. The 
behavioral strategy of the active type, which is 16% of the variance of all 
responses, manifests itself in overcoming the adverse consequences of a 
pandemic threat situation. 21% of the total variance were responses, 



Cognitive and Emotional Components of the Inner Picture of an Individual … 
Yuliia RYBINSKA, et al. 

 

92 

generally characterizing an optimistic behavioral strategy. Respondents of 
this type generally experience positive emotions, rationally assess the current 
situation, and are positive towards the future. 

Conclusions 

Analyzing the results of the study, it can be noted that in the context 
of the COVID-19 pandemic, namely adaptive quarantine, the respondents often 
felt fear, especially fear for their health and their loved ones. It should be noted that a 
significant number of respondents mentioned crucial positive changes in their lives. 
Qualitative analysis of the pandemic consequences showed that most often 
among the pandemic negative impacts, the respondents indicated anxiety, fears, and 
feelings of hopelessness. The positive consequences of the pandemic were - 
personal growth, resource awareness, freeing time for themselves and their needs, 
strengthening family relationships, as well as familiarity with online opportunities. We 
also found a positive attitude of our subjects, the belief that everything will 
be fine, and, in general, a positive emotional attitude to the situation. The 
respondents feel that the situation is difficult but controlled. Their optimism 
helps to cope with difficult circumstances. The study found the highest 
number of people with a high level of life satisfaction and, accordingly, the 
lowest, with low. Respondents are satisfied with their living conditions and their lives in 
general. But they are least satisfied with their achievements and need further 
accomplishments. Thus, this study demonstrates that an unexpected, 
uncertain, and at the same time dangerous situation such as the COVID-19 
pandemic can cause not only negative effects but also positive changes in the lives of 
Ukrainians. 

References 

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with 
Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. 
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13  

Korzhova, E.  Y., & Berdnikova, A. V. (2016). Metodika «Otnoshenie k znachimoj 
zhiznennoj situacii» [Methodology "Attitude to a significant life situation"]. 
In Praktikum po psikhologii zhiznennykh situatcii [Manual on Life Psychology] 
(pp. 59-72). Russian State Pedagogical University named after A. I. Herzen. 
https://docplayer.com/28662716-Praktikum-po-psihologii-zhiznennyh-
situaciy.html 

Kumar, A., & Somani, A. (2020). Dealing with Corona virus anxiety and OCD. 
Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32302962/  

https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32302962/


BRAIN. Broad Research in                                                             December, 2021 
Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience                                      Volume 12, Issue 4 

 

93 

Osin E. N., & Leontiev D. A. (2020). Kratkie russkoyazychnye shkaly diagnostiki 
sub"ektivnogo bla-gopoluchiya: psihometricheskie harakteristiki i sravnitel'nyj analiz 
[Brief Russian-Language Instruments to Measure Subjective Well-Being: 
Psychometric Properties and Comparative Analysis]. Monitoring of Public 
Opinion Economic and Social Changes, 1, 117-142. 
https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06 

Liu, N., Zhang, F., Wei, C., Jia, Y., Shang, Z., Sun, L., Wu, L., Sun, Z., Zhou, Y., & 
Liu, W. (2020). Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 
outbreak in China hardest-hit areas: Gender differences matter. Psychiatry 
Research, 287, 112921. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32240896/   

Osin, E.  (2012). Izmerenie pozitivnykh i negativnykh emotcii: razrabotka 
russkoiazychnogo analoga metodiki PANAS [Measuring positive and 
negative emotions: developing a Russian-language analogue of the PANAS 
method]. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 9(4), 91-110. 
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/izmerenie-pozitivnyh-i-negativnyh-
emotsiy-razrabotka-russkoyazychnogo-analoga-metodiki-panas/viewer  

Pohorilska, N. І. (2021). Stavlennia do znachym sytuatsii pandemii cherez COVID 
19 [Attitude towards the significant situation of the pandemic because of 
COVID-19]. Materialy mizhnarodnoho naukovo-praktychnoho seminaru 
“Psykholohichni vyklyky pandemii COVID-19: ukraino-kanadiiskyi dosvid” 
[Materials of the international scientific and practical seminar 
"Psychological challenges of the pandemic COVID-19: Ukraine-Canada 
experience] (pp. 83-86). Laboratory of Methodology and Theory of 
Psychology of the GS Institute of Psychology Kostyuk NAPS of Ukraine.  
https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/725040/1/26_04_2021.pdf 

Roy, D., Tripathy, S., Kar, S. K., Sharma, N., Verma, S. K., & Kaushal, V. (2020). 
Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need 
in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of 
Psychiatry, 51, 102083. 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139237/  

Skotnikova, I., Egorova, P., Ogarkova (Dubinskaya), Y., & Zhiganov, L. (2020). 
Psikhologicheskie osobennosti perezhivaniia neopredelennosti pri epidemii 
COVID-19 [Psychological features of experiencing uncertainty during the 
COVID-19 epidemic]. Sotcialnaia i ekonomicheskaia psikhologiia, 5(2), 245-268. 
http://soc-econom-psychology.ru/engine/documents/document792.pdf  

Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020). 
Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial 
stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the 
general in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public 
Health, 17(5), 1729. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32155789/  

https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32240896/
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/izmerenie-pozitivnyh-i-negativnyh-emotsiy-razrabotka-russkoyazychnogo-analoga-metodiki-panas/viewer
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/izmerenie-pozitivnyh-i-negativnyh-emotsiy-razrabotka-russkoyazychnogo-analoga-metodiki-panas/viewer
https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/725040/1/26_04_2021.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139237/
http://soc-econom-psychology.ru/engine/documents/document792.pdf
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32155789/