Oral Sciences n3 Original Article Braz J Oral Sci. 8(4):197-200 DNA damage in viscose factory workers occupationally exposed to carbon di-sulfide using buccal cell comet assay Pappuswamy Manikantan1, Vellingiri Balachandar2; Keshavarao Sasikala3; Subramanium Mohanadevi4 1M.Sc, M.Phil, Ph.D, PGDMBT, Junior Research fellow (UGC), Division of Human Genetics, School of Life sciences, Department of Zoology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India 2M.Sc, M.Phil, Ph.D, Senior research fellow (CSIR), Division of Human Genetics, School of Life sciences, Department of Zoology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India 3M.Sc, Ph.D, FAZ, MAFRC, Professor and Head, Division of Human Genetics, School of Life sciences, Department of Zoology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India 4M.Sc, M.Phil, B.Ed, Ph.D, Senior research fellow (CSIR), Division of Human Genetics, School of Life sciences, Department of Zoology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India Correspondence to: Pappuswamy Manikantan Division of Human Molecular Genetics Department of Zoology, School of Life Sciences Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India-641046 E-mail: humangentistmani@gmail.com Abstract Aim: The most important industrial use of carbon disulfide (CS 2 ) has been in the fabrication of regenerated cellulose rayon by the viscose process and cellophane. CS 2 leads to increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations in workers with occupational exposure to CS 2 . Methods: In the present study, the DNA damage was analyzed by using buccal cell comet assay for 30 viscose plant workers who are occupationally exposed to CS 2 and 30 healthy individuals. Both groups were classified as smokers and non-smokers and only the experimental subjects were classified based on the exposure period. The data were analyzed statistically by the Student’s t-test. Results: The results of this study showed increased levels of DNA damage among viscose plant workers. Conclusion: The habit of cigarette smoking among the viscose workers had a synergistic effect on inducing DNA damage. Keywords: carbon di-sulphide, DNA damage, smoking, buccal cell comet assay. Introduction Carbon disulfide (CS 2 ) is an important industrial liquid organic solvent, which is mainly used to treat alkali cellulose in the viscose process (a source of rayon and cellophane). CS 2 may react with chlorine in the presence of a catalyst to form carbon tetrachloride also toxicants. In past years, studies have shown different potential cytotoxic effects of CS 2 on mammals1-2. Acute and subacute poisoning appear due to exposure to CS 2 concentrations of 500-3000 mg/m3 and are predominantly characterized by neurological and psychiatric symptoms, gastrointestinal disturbances and genderual disorders3-10, whereas exposure to CS 2 concentrations above 5000 mg/m3 may induce coma or even death11. The toxic effects of CS 2 on experimental animals12-15 have been extensively demonstrated and epidemiological studies on CS 2 exposure among workers in viscose rayon plants have been also reviewed, including studies of ischemic heart disease �IHD) mortality for workers in the viscose rayon industry16-18. Comprehensive testing of the mutagenic potential of CS 2 has been performed on several types of bacteria (Ames test) and Drosophila, with no positive results19. Further studies on Salmonella typhimurium, Drosophila, human fibroblasts cultures, human blood leucocytes and rats have been inconclusive20. Numerous studies have shown elevated standard mortality ratios (SMRs) for workers occupationally exposed to CS 2 . Nonetheless, there are no reports available for CS 2 that provide strong evidence of genotoxic effects on DNA. Since the buccal epithelium provides an alternative source of tissue for monitoring human exposure to occupational and environmental genotoxins21. The present study was carried out to assess, using buccal cell comet assay, the genotoxicity among viscose plant workers who are occupationally exposed to CS 2 . Braz J Oral Sci. October/December 2009 - Volume 8, Number 4 Received for publication: August 19, 2009 Accepted: November 11, 2009 198 Braz J Oral Sci. 8(4):197-200 Materials and methods Subject recruitment The study subjects were 30 viscose plant workers and 30 healthy individuals as controls who were selected from various cities of southern India between August 2008 and January 2009. Prior to enrollment in the the study, all subjects gave written informed consent. A questionnaire was used to collect information on gender, age, duration of exposure, use of protective masks, general health status, smoking habits and exposure to drugs for each experimental and control subject. There were 12 smokers and 18 non-smokers in each group. The average cigarette consumption of smokers in both groups was nearly 13.4 ± 3.0 (mean±standard deviation) cigarettes/day. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of Bharathiar University. Sample collection Buccal cells were collected from subjects by oral brushing. Prior to brushing, subjects washed their mouth with normal saline to avoid the interference of mucus. Collected samples were taken in cold phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and cells were allowed to pellet down. The cells were then resuspended in 300 ìL PBS and 50 ìL of cell suspension were taken for comet assay. Comet assay Comet assay was performed under alkaline conditions by using a standard protocol22 with some modifications23. Cells were embedded in low melting point agarose on glass slide precoated with 1% normal agarose. After solidification of gel, the slide was submerged into cool lysis solution [2.5M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris (pH 10.0), 1% LSS lauryl sarcosine sodium salt to which 10% DMSO, 1% Triton X- 100 were freshly added] and kept overnight at 4°C. The slides were then placed on the horizontal electrophoresis unit filled with freshly prepared alkaline electrophoresis buffer (300 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA, pH 13) for 30 min and then subjected to electrophoresis at 25V/ 300mA for 40 min. After electrophoresis the slides were neutralized for ~60 min in 0.4 M Tris/HCl, pH 7.5 on ice, followed by staining in ethidium bromide (stock concentration 25 ìg/mL in distilled water) and mounting on glycerol. All steps were performed on ice to prevent the removal of thin agarose gel layer from the slide. The stained slides were examined under Nikon fluorescent microscope with a 580nm emission filter. Statistical analysis Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Student’s t-test was performed to compare the DNA damage levels between the experimental and controls. Statistically significant levels were considered at p < 0.05. Results The subjects were selected from viscose plant workers who are occupationally exposed to CS2. The tail movement of comets observed in the buccal cells of experimental and controls are given in Table 1. In the control group, the percentage of DNA damage observed among smokers was higher than that observed among non-smokers, though without statistically significant data was observed except for the 3 subjects aged 26-35 years. An age-related increase in DNA damage was observed in both control and experimental subjects. Experimental subjects over 46 years of age showed maximum DNA damage (25.3±0.3%). Significant increase (p < 0.05) of DNA damage percentage was identified in most individuals of the experimental groups when compared to the control subjects. An increased level of DNA damage was observed in the viscose plant workers with smoking habits when compared to smoking controls and nonsmoking viscose plant workers. To determine the effect of duration of exposure to CS 2 on DNA damage, the workers were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they had less than 10 years of exposure or more than 10 years of exposure (Table 2). No statistically significant difference in DNA damage was observed with increased duration of exposure to CS 2 (Table 2). Discussion Mutagenesis is involved in the pathogenesis of many neoplasias. Occupational exposure may contribute to the development of pernicious illnesses, many times through mechanisms that involve genotoxic changes. Continuous efforts have been made to identify genotoxic agents, to determine conditions of harmful exposure and to monitor populations that are excessively exposed24-25. Groups Number of subjects Percentage of DNA damage <25 5 6.3 ± 0.1 26-35 years 3 8.1 ± 0.3* 36-45 years 2 14.0 ± 0.3* 46-55 years 2 16.6 ± 0.2 <25 7 7.2 ± 0.4 26-35 years 4 8.6 ± 0.2 36-45 years 3 11.8 ± 1.2 46-55 years 4 14.1 ± 0.4 <25 5 14.1 ± 0.6 26-35 years 3 16.1 ± 0.5** 36-45 years 2 21.2 ± 0.1 46-55 years 2 25.3 ± 0.3** <25 7 11.4 ± 0.7* 26-35 years 4 14.4 ± 0.4* 36-45 years 3 18.5 ± 1.4* 46-55 years 4 20.2 ± 0.3 Subjects Control smokers Control non-smokers Experimental smokers Experimental non smokers * p < 0.05 compared with non-smoking control subjects; ** p < 0.05 compared with smoking control subjects. Table 1 - Classes of comets and percentage of DNA damage among the control and experimental subjects DNA damage in viscose factory workers occupationally exposed to carbon di-sulfide using buccal cell comet assay 199 Braz J Oral Sci. 8(4):197-200 Exposure period Number of subjects Percentage of DNA damage <10 years 12 12.9 ± 3.1 > 20 years 18 13.27 ± 4.7 Table 2 - Percentage of DNA damage according to duration of exposure in experimental subjects The present study was designed to assess the DNA damage among viscose plant workers who are occupationally exposed to CS 2 . Comet assay is a valuable method for detection of occupational and environmental exposures to genotoxicants, and it can be used as a tool in risk assessment for hazard characterization26-27, air pollution28, cigarette smoking29 and various in vitro and in vivo studies30. In the present investigation, a notable DNA damage was observed among the healthy controls. It is due to the assay being widely used in studying DNA damage in healthy individuals31 and day to day variation in buccal epithelial cell strand breaks32. There was significant difference between experimental and control subjects who are occupationally exposed to CS 2 . In past years, CS 2 concentrations in viscose rayon plants averaged about 250 mg/m3; they were subsequently reduced to 50-150 mg/m3 and more recently exposure levels of CS 2 are mostly below 31 mg/m3,33. A report on hypospermia, asthenospermia and teratospermia in young workers exposed to 40-80 mg/m3 of CS 2 confirmed gonadal injury34. Le and Fu (1996)35 showed that the CS 2 induce chromosome aberration in human sperm. Numerous epidemiological reports concluded that the CS 2 is toxicant to viscose industry workers36-38. In this study, experimental subjects with smoking habits showed maximum levels of DNA damage when compared to respective controls, which shows that the CS 2 exposure with cigarette smoking has synergistic effect on inducing DNA damage. Chromosomal aberrations were shown to be good indicators of future risk of cancer39. Likewise, DNA damages are the ultimate causes of cancer because DNA base changes can be mutagenic40. The present findings highlight the importance of investigating the genotoxicity of CS 2 on viscose plant workers occupationally exposed to this organic solvent when the smoking habit is associated, since this information provides an increased degree of identification for the positive response. Acknowledgements The authors express their sincere thanks to workers from various viscose industry in south India and authorities of Bharathiar University for their kind technical support and providing facilities and encouragement during the study. References 1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Criteria for a recommended standard occupational exposure to carbon disulfide. Washington, DC: US Department of Health Education and Welfare; 1977. 2. Carbon disulfide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1979. (Environmental Health Criteria, No. 10). 3. Izmerov NF, editor. Carbon disulfide. Moscow: Centre of International Projects (GKNT ); 1983. (Scientific reviews of Soviet literature on toxicity and hazards of chemicals, No.41). 4. Jun-Yi L, Xaio-Min F. Human sperm chromosome analysis study on human sperm chromosome mutagenesis induced by carbon disulfide. Biomed Environ Sci. 1996; 9: 37-40. 5. Reinhardt F, Drexler H, Bickel A, Claus D, Ulm K, Angerer J, et al. Electrophysiological investigation of central, peripheral and autonomic nerve function in workers with long-term low-level exposure to carbon disulphide in the viscose industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1997; 70: 249-56. 6. Chu CC, Huang CC, Chu NS, Wu TN. Carbon disulfide induced polyneuropathy: sural nerve pathology, electrophysiology and clinical correlation. Acta Neurol Scand. 1999; 94: 258-63. 7. Wronska-Nofer T, Chojnowska-Jezierska J, Nofer JR, Halatek T, Wisniewska-Knypl J. Increased oxidative stress in subjects exposed to carbon disulphide (CS2) e an occupational coronary risk factor. Arch Toxicol. 2002; 76: 152e7. 8. Wang C, Tan X, Bi Y. Su Y, Yan J, Ma S et al. Cross-sectional study of the ophthalmological effects of carbon disulfide in chinese viscose workers. Int J Environ Health. 2002; 205: 367-72. 9. Krstev S, Perunicic B, Farkic B, Banicevic R. Neuropsychiatric effects in workers with occupational exposure to carbon disulfide. J Occup Health. 2003; 45: 81-7. 10. Nishiwaki Y, Takebayashi T, O’Uchi T., Nomiyama T, Uemura T, Sakurai H et al. Six-year observational cohort study of the effect of carbon disulphide on brain MRI in rayon manufacturing workers. Occup Environ Med. 2004; 61: 225-32. 11. Benowitz N. Cardiovascular toxicology. In: LaDou J, editor. Occupational medicine, Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1990. p. 237-46. 12. Hoffman P, Klapperstuck M. Effects of carbon disulfide on cardiovascular function after acute and subacute exposure of rats. Biomed Biochim Acta. 1990; 49: 121-8. 13. Hoffman P, Muller S. Subacute carbon disulfide exposure modifies adrenergic cardiovascular actions in rats. Biomed Biochim Acta. 1990;49: 115-20. 14. Mooreman MP, Sills RC, Collins BJ, Morgan DL. Carbon disulfide neurotoxicity in rats: II. Toxicokinetics. Neurotoxicology 1998; 19: 88-98. 15. Sills RC, Harry GJ, Valentine WM, Morgan DL. Interdisciplinary neurotoxicity inhalation studies: carbon disulfide and carbonyl sulfide research in F344 rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005; 207 (2 suppl): 245-50. 16. Swaen GM, Braun C, Slangen JJ. Mortality of Dutch workers exposed to carbon disulfide. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1994; 66:103-10. 17. Liss G, Finkelstein M. Mortality among workers ex- posed to carbon disulfide. Arch Environ Health. 1996; 51: 193-200. 18. Sulsky SI, Hooven FH, Burch MT, Mundt KA. Critical review of the epidemiological literature on the potential cardiovascular effects of occupational carbon disulfide exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002; 75: 365-80. 19. Beauchamp RO, Jr A. critical review of the literature on carbon disulfide toxicity. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1983; 11: 169-278. 20. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). Solvents in Common Use. 1988 21. Stone JG, Jones NJ, McGregor AD, Waters R. Development of a human biomonitoring assay using buccal mucosa: comparison of smoking-related DNA adducts in mucosa versus biopsies. Cancer Res. 1995; 55: 1267-70. 22. Maluf SM, Erdtmann B. Evaluation of occupational genotoxic risk in a Brazilian hospital. Gen Mol Biol. 2000; 23: 485-8. 23. Maluf SM, Erdtmann B. Follow-up study of genetic damage in lymphocytes of pharmacists and nurses handling antineoplastics drugs evaluated by cytokinesis-block micronuclei analysis and single cell gel electrophoresis assay. Mutat Res. 2000; 471: 21-7. 24. Collins A, Dusinska M, Franklin M, Somorovská M, Petrovská H, Duthie S, et al. Comet assay in human biomonitoring studies reliability, validation and applications. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1997; 30: 139-46. 25. Valverde M, del Carmen López M, López I, Sanchez I, Fortoul TI, Ostrosky- Wegman P et al. DNA damage in leukocytes and buccal and nasal epithelial cells of individuals exposed to air pollution in Mexico City. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1998; 30: 147-52. 26. Moller P. The alkaline Comet assay: towards validation in biomonitoring of DNA damaging exposures. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006; 98: 336-45. 27. Dusinska M, Collins AR. The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene– environment interactions. Mutagenesis. 2008; 23: 191-205. 28. Valverde M, del Carmen López M, López I, Sanchez I, Fortoul TI, Ostrosky- Wegman P et al. DNA damage in leukocytes and buccal and nasal epithelial cells of individuals exposed to air pollution in Mexico City. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1998; 30: 147-52. 29. Rojas E, Valverde M, Sordo M, Ostrosky-Wegman P. DNA damage in exfoliated buccal cells of smokers assessed by the single cell gel electrophoresis assay. Mutat Res. 1996; 370: 115-20. 30. Fairbairn DW, Olive PL, O’Neill KL. The comet assay: a comprehensive review. Mutat Res. 1995; 33: 37-59. 31. Bajpayee M, Pandey AK, Parmar D, Mathur N, Seth PK, Dhawan A. Comet assay responses in human lymphocytes are not influenced by the menstrual cycle: a study in healthy Indian females. Mutat Res. 2005; 565: 163-72. 32. Szeto YT, Benzie IFF, Collins AR, Choi SW, Cheng CY, Yow CM et al. A buccal cell model comet assay: development and evaluation for human biomonitoring and nutritional studies. Mutat Res. 2005; 578: 371-81. 33. Daemen E, van Risseghem M, De Bacquer D, Bulat P, Braeckman L, Vanhoorne M. Preliminary external quality assessment for the biological monitoring of carbon disulfide with urinary 2- thiothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid. Ann Occup Hyg. 1999; 43: 125-30. 34. Lancranjan I, Popescu HI, Klepsch I. Changes of the gonadic function in chronic carbon disulfide poisoning. Med Lav. 1969; 60: 556-71. DNA damage in viscose factory workers occupationally exposed to carbon di-sulfide using buccal cell comet assay 200 Braz J Oral Sci. 8(4):197-200 35. Le JY, Fu XM. Human sperm chromosome analysis – study on human sperm chromosome mutagens induced by carbon disulfide. Biomed Environ Sci.1996; 9: 37-40. 36. Guidotti TL, Hoffman H. Indicators of cardiovascular risk among workers exposed to high intermittent levels of carbon disulphide. Occup Med (Lond). 1999; 49: 507-15. 37. Wang Q, Fu K, Wu Q. Effects on fertility and menstrual cycle of female workers exposed to carbon disulfide. Chin Publ Health. 1999; 15: 215-7 [in Chinese]. 38. Wang YF, Shiu YF. Investigation on eye injury of workers exposed to CS2. J Lab Med. 2000; 17: 89 [in Chinese]. 39. Hagmar L, Brøgger A, Hansteen IL, Heim S, Hogstedt B, Knudsen L et al. Cancer risk in humans predicted by increased levels of chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes: Nordic study group on the health risk of chromosome damage. Cancer Res. 1994; 54: 2919-22. 40. Poirier MC. DNA adducts as exposure biomarkers and indicators of cancer risk. Environ Health Perspect. 1997; 105 (Suppl. 4): 907-12. DNA damage in viscose factory workers occupationally exposed to carbon di-sulfide using buccal cell comet assay