1http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8664034 Volume 20 2021 e214034 Original Article 1 Federal University of Patos, Patos, PB, Brazil. 2 Cruzeiro do Sul University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 3 Santa Cecilia University, Santos, SP, Brazil. 4 Camilo Castelo Branco University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 5 Dentistry Department at University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 6 Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. Corresponding author: Ângela Toshie Araki Av Robert Kennedy 2126/sala 4, ZIP CODE 09861-080 - São Bernardo do Campo, SP Brazil Tel.: +55-11-992534078 Fax: +55-11 -43921575 a_araki@me.com Editor: Dr Altair A. Del Bel Cury Received: January 20, 2021 Accepted: May 25, 2021 Comparative in vitro study of intracanal Enterococcus faecalis reduction using photosensitizers in aPDT Maria Cleide Azevedo Braz1 , André Hayato Saguchi2 , Eduardo Akisue3 , Adriana de Oliveira Lira2 , Sidnea Aparecida Freitas Paiva2 , Aldo Brugnera Junior4 , Mary Caroline Skelton Macedo5 , André Luiz da Costa Michelotto6 , Ângela Toshie Araki2,* Aim: To compare Enterococcus faecalis reduction after antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) used with methylene blue, toluidine blue, tannin, and curcumin as photosensitizers, an adjunct to endodontic chemomechanical preparation (CMP) in root canals of human teeth. Methods: A total of 120 single-rooted teeth were divided into 6 groups (n  =  20): G1- CMP and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); G2- CMP and saline solution; G3- CMP, 2.5% NaOCl, and aPDT with 0.005% methylene blue; G4- CMP, 2.5% NaOCl, and aPDT with 0.005% toluidine blue; G5- CMP, 2.5% NaOCl, and aPDT with 0.005% tannin; and G6- CMP, 2.5% NaOCl, and aPDT with 0.005% curcumin. A portable semiconductor laser was used (660  nm, 100  mW, 1.8  J, 180s) in groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and a blue LED light-curing (420-480  nm, 1200 mV/cm2) in G6. For all groups, a 5 min pre-irradiation time was applied. Samples were collected before (initial collection), immediately after (intermediate collection) and 7 days after CMP (final collection) for colony-forming unit (CFU) counting. The Kruskal-Wallis test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed (p < 0.05; 95% confidence interval). Results: In between-group comparisons, there was no significant difference observed in the number of CFUs at the initial (p < 0.001) and final collections (p < 0.001) for G2 and G3. In within-group comparisons, the number of CFUs showed a decreasing trend in G4 (p = 0.007) and G5 (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Photosensitizers promoted E. faecalis reduction, with better results for tannin and curcumin. Alternative photosensitizers should be the focus of further studies. Keywords: Photodynamic. Endodontics. Photosensitizing agents. Curcumin. Tannins. mailto:a_araki@me.com https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0290-6987 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1903-4986 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7934-7255 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7295-803X https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5882-8802 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0023-191X https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4189-5088 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7855-4407 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4402-7531 2 Braz et al. Introduction The main goal of endodontic treatment is to eliminate or reduce the intraradicu- lar microbial load to a level that allows for the prevention or cure of apical peri- odontitis1. The development and/or persistence of apical periodontitis is closely related to the presence of microorganisms within the root canal, and insufficient root canal disinfection has been suggested as one of the main reasons for treat- ment failure2. In addition to auxiliary chemicals, intracanal medicaments, passive ultrasonic irri- gation, magnification, and ultrasound, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has also been used as an adjunct to conventional endodontic treatment3-5. aPDT requires a photosensitizer and a light source emitting at a wavelength close to its absorption peak that will absorb energy from light photons6. The photosensitizing agent binds to the microorganism membrane or cell wall or accumulates selectively in them, becoming target to the light irradiated. In the presence of oxygen, photosen- sitizers generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) – singlet oxygen and free radicals – that, by oxidative reactions, can lead to death of various organisms- fungi, viruses, protozoa and bacteria7. Photosensitizers initially act on the cell membrane to increase cell permeability, and then penetrate the cell acting on other intracellular organelles8. Methylene blue and toluidine blue, at low concentrations, have been widely used as photosensitizers for not exerting cytotoxic effects on keratinocytes and fibroblasts9. Tannins and cur- cumin are also used in aPDT. Tannins are astringent, hemostatic, polyphenolic com- pounds that have been used as natural dyes and are major active constituents of plants, which justifies the traditional use of plants as anti-inflammatory and healing agents10. They have a strong absorption band at 672 nm and rapid skin clearance. Tannins are non-toxic and have favorable photophysical properties, with high trip- let-state yields. Curcumin, a polyphenolic compound extracted from Curcuma Longa rhizomes, has been widely used in traditional Chinese medicine and food industry, with anti-inflammatory, antitumor, antifungal, antibacterial, and anticarcinogenic properties11. In aPDT, curcumin has high light absorption capacity at wavelengths in the blue spectral region, between 455 nm and 492 nm12 which is commonly used in dental offices for the light curing of resin-based composites by using a LED or halogen light device. Reduction of intracanal microorganisms promoted by aPDT ranges from 65 to 99.6% depending on the photosensitizer used, and some studies have been conducted to compare the reducing ability of photosensitizers12,13. This way, in this study had com- pared methylene blue, toluidine blue, tannin, and curcumin for their ability to reduce intracanal Enterococcus faecalis. The purpose of this study was to compare microbial reduction after aPDT (660nm) used with methylene blue, toluidine blue, tannin, and curcumin as photosensitizers as an adjunct to chemomechanical preparation (CMP) in root canals of human teeth contaminated with E. faecalis. 3 Braz et al. Materials and Methods Study design and setting This in vitro study was conducted after approval by the institutional research eth- ics committee (approval number 2.332.759). The sample size was calculated using G*Power, version 3.1, based on a pilot data set to obtain a medium to large effect size, with a significance level of 5%, 95% confidence interval (CI), statistical power of 80% (β = 0.20), and a 1:1 allocation ratio. A sample size of 20 specimens per group was required. Specimen preparation A total 120 extracted single-rooted mandibular incisors with fully formed apices were selected for this study. All teeth had been donated to the human tooth bank of our institution, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to tooth donation. After periodontal tissue removal and rubber cup and pumice prophylaxis, the crowns were removed with a diamond disc. The remaining 12-mm roots were autoclaved at 120ºC, 1 atm, for 20 min, and the apical third were sealed with Araldite epoxy resin (Brascola, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) to prevent leakage of bacterial cultures after contamination. Microorganisms and culture medium The root canals were contaminated with a pure culture of E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (BHI00- Oxoid; Basinkstoke, UK). Isolated colonies were suspended in screw-cap tubes containing 5  mL of BHI broth. The suspension was mechanically shaken and adjusted in a spectrophotometer with absorbance at 800 nm to match a 1.0 McFarland standard (3.0 x 108 bacteria/mL). The specimens were transferred to flasks containing sterile BHI broth and remained incubated at 37°C for 24 h to confirm sterility. Contamination with E. faecalis In a laminar flow hood, 5.0 mL of BHI broth were removed and replaced with 4.0 mL of E. faecalis suspension. The flasks containing the specimens were sealed and incu- bated at 37°C in a 10% CO2 atmosphere for 7 days, with 2.0 mL of contaminated BHI broth being replaced with 2.0 mL of sterile BHI broth every 2 days to avoid medium saturation. Bacterial growth during incubation was determined by turbidity of the cul- ture medium. Experimental groups The 120 specimens were divided into 6 groups (n = 20) according to the disinfection protocol used during CMP, as shown in Table 1. 4 Braz et al. Chemomechanical preparation and photodynamic therapy The teeth were arranged in a table-top lathe machine and prepared with a size 35.06 WaveOne Gold file (Dentsply). All root canals were prepared and irrigated with 10 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), followed by irrigation with 10 mL of saline solution, except group 2 that irrigation was realized with saline solution. In groups sub- mitted to aPDT after instrumentation, the canals were irrigated with photosensitizers solution (3 mL) of 0.005% with a 5-min pre-irradiation period. Portable semiconductor laser (Laser DUO®, AlGaAs, InGaAlP, λ880 nm and λ660 nm, MM OPTICS LTDA, São Carlos, SP, Brazil) was used at a wavelength of 660 nm, 100 mW output power, and laser beam area of 3 mm2, for a total energy of 1.8 J per spot area over an irradiation time of 180s. In final, the canals were irrigated with 10 mL of saline solution to remove the dyes according to the protocol of Gomes et al.14 In group 6, aPDT irradiation was performed with a blue LED light-curing unit (Gnatus), at a wavelength of 420-480 nm, with an intensity of 1200 mV/cm2. Microbiologic collection Samples were collected at 3 time points: before CMP (initial collection), immediately after CMP (intermediate collection), and 7 days after CMP (final collection). All proce- dures were performed in a laminar flow hood. Initial collection Before CMP, the specimens were irrigated with 10 mL of saline solution, dried with 15-mm diameter sterile paper points for 1 min (Figure 1), and stored in Eppendorf tubes (Figure 2). Table 1. Groups distribution N DISINFECTION PROTOCOL G1(Control) 20 CMP + 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite G2(Control) 20 CMP + Saline solution G3 20 CMP + Methylene blue + aPDT G4 20 CMP + Toluidine blue + aPDT G5 20 CMP + Tannin + aPDT G6 20 CMP + Curcumin + aPDT Figure 1. Microbiologic collection with a sterile paper point. 5 Braz et al. Intermediate collection CMP was performed after the initial collection, and the canals were dried with sterile paper points and stored individually in Eppendorf tubes, following the same protocol used for the initial collection. The specimens were filled with BHI broth and sealed with a gutta-percha stick to prevent contamination. The specimens were placed in individual Eppendorf tubes containing 60 µL of sterile BHI broth to maintain hydration, so that the BHI broth did not reach the middle third of the canal to prevent infiltration into the gutta-percha sealing. The tubes were incubated at 37°C in a 10% CO2 atmosphere for 7 days. Final collection After 7 days, the root canals were again irrigated with 10 mL of saline solution, dried with 35-mm diameter sterile paper points, and placed in individual Eppendorf tubes containing 1 mL of sterile BHI broth. After collection, the Eppendorf tubes were vor- texed (Biomixer-QL-901) for 60 s to homogenize the solution. Dilution and plating After mechanical agitation, the collected samples were diluted 1:10 and 1:100 in ster- ile BHI broth. A 50-µL aliquot of the 10-2 dilution was seeded on plates containing BHI agar, in triplicate, and the plates were incubated at 37°C in a 10% CO2 atmosphere. After 48 h, colonies on plates were counted to determine the colony-forming units (CFUs). The number of CFUs was multiplied by 2000 to account for dilutions during sample preparation (100 times) and 50-µL plating (20 times less than 1  mL), thus yielding the number of CFUs per mL of sample (CFU/mL). The average of the 3 plates of each collection was taken as the final count (Figure 3). Figure 2. Eppendorf tube with the paper point after collection 6 Braz et al. Statistical analysis Data were analyzed using BioStat 4.0. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normality of data distribution. The Kruskal-Wallis test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for nonparametric data, at a significance level of p  <  0.05 and 95% CI. Results Table 2 shows the results of the comparative analysis of bacterial load (CFU/mL) in each group at the 3 assessment time points. In between-group comparisons, a signif- icant difference was observed in the number of CFUs at the initial (p < 0.001) and final collections (p < 0.001). In within-group comparisons, the number of CFUs showed a decreasing trend in groups 4 (p = 0.007) and 5 (p = 0.001). When comparing initial and final values, percentage reductions in relation to mean CFUs were 68.2% for group 4 and 69.9% for group 5. Figure 3. Schematic representation of microbiologic collection in the initial, intermediate, and final stages 100 µL 10-1 1,000 µL 9,000 µL 9,000 µL 30 µL 50 µL 50 µL Sum of 3 plates 3 2,000 100 µL 10-2 10-2 Table 2. Comparison of bacterial load at 3 assessment time points Time point Group G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 p-value(1) Initial Collection Mean 116,36A,Ba 8,37Aa 225,12Ba 269,66Ba 272,30Ba 267,39Ba < 0,001* SD 207,46 9,46 215,97 283,75 259,81 286,61 Intermediate Collection Mean 31,73Aa 85,00Aa 74,26Ab 192,92Aa,b 54,67Ab 292,07Aa < 0,078 SD 35,23 200,93 66,68 209,94 88,20 408,84 Final Collection Mean 74,34A,Ba 1856719,65Bb 272,40Ca,b 85,77A,Bb 81,83A,Bb 12,23Aa < 0,001* SD 159,94 8303252,97 280,49 91,62 164,47 18,38 p-valor(2) 0,630 < 0,001* 0,007* 0,007* 0,001* 0,089 % inhibition (initial-final) 36,1% - - 68,2% 69,9% 95,4% SD = standard deviation; values with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); (1) uppercase letters compare values in the same row (between-group comparisons); (2) lowercase letters compare values in the same column (within-group comparisons). 7 Braz et al. The control group 2 (with saline) and group 3 (with methylene blue) showed no reduc- tion in CFUs. All other groups showed bacterial reduction between the initial and final collections, but group 6 (with curcumin) had a marked standard deviation, and the result was not statistically significant. Discussion E. faecalis is a valuable microbiologic marker for in vitro studies because of its ability to colonize the root canal in a biofilm-like style2. In addition, E. faecalis does not require strict culture conditions: it grows in culture media supplemented with blood or serum15, justi- fying the use of BHI agar as a culture medium, as previously done by Silva Garcez et al.16 (2006). The incubation period was 7 days, according to Dametto et al.17 (2005). The procedures for microbiologic collection vary between studies. Bonsor et al.18 (2006) used an endodontic file to remove dentin debris from the root canal and this instrument together with the swarf sample (dentin debris) was analyzed, while Sou- kos et al.19 (2006) and Fimple et al.9 (2008) analyzed the solution leaking from the api- cal foramen. In the present study, microbiologic samples were collected from within the root canal by using sterile paper points, according to previous studies14,16,20,21. In all groups, the auxiliary chemical used was 2.5% NaOCl, because its bactericidal effect and ability to dissolve necrotic and living tissues22,23. In control group 1 (CMP with 2.5% NaOCl), there was only a 36.1% reduction in bacterial growth, which was not statistically significant (p  =  0.63). Higher concentration of NaOCl would improve its properties24-26 but increase the risk of accidents27 because substances are less biocom- patible with peri radicular tissues24,28. Increasing the volume of the solution to compen- sate for the effects of concentration22,29-32 would improve its bactericidal properties. The present study compared the efficacy in reducing E. faecalis of 4 dyes used as photosensitizers in aPDT: methylene blue, toluidine blue, tannin, and curcumin. Methylene blue is the most commonly used dye in endodontics9,19, followed by tolu- idine blue14,18,20,21. They are known to be more effective against gram-positive than gram-negative species33. Methylene blue is used at various concentrations, ranging from 1 μg/mL to 25 μg/mL, as is toluidine blue, ranging from 12.5 μg/mL to 100 μg/ mL. In accordance with the study by Gomes et al.14 (2008) the 4 photosensitizers tested in this study were used at a concentration of 5 μg/mL (0.005%). An unexpected statistically significant (p<0.001) bacterial growth was observed between the initial and final collections using methylene blue. However, when a higher concentration was used there was a reduction of 80%9 and 97%19. Besides to the concentration, better results could also be achieved using more energy density of light (J/cm²)9 and com- bining it with passive ultrasonic irrigation34,35. In contrast to methylene blue, toluidine blue at a concentration of 0.005% promoted a statistically significant reduction of 68.2%, in accordance with other studies12,18,36. Extracted from guava leaves (Psidium guajava L. Myrtaceae), ‘espinheira-santa’ leaves (Maytenus sp., Celastraceae), and Brazilian peppertree leaves (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi), tannins are astringent, hemostatic substances37 commonly used in the leather tanning industry and paint industry. The hydrolyzable tannins have aroused the inter- est of researchers to be tested against microorganisms that infect the root canal sys- 8 Braz et al. tem because they are non-toxic and have favorable photophysical properties with high triplet-state yields9. The use of tannin in Group 5 promoted a statistically significant bacterial reduction of 69.9% (p = 0.001), better than groups 3 and 4 (methylene blue and toluidine blue, respectively) and group 1 (NaOCl alone). According to Verza et al.38 (2012) hydrolyzable tannins have a stable binding to central glycose residues and con- sequently increased solubility and binding of its molecules to low-density lipoproteins, facilitating entry into the target cell. Given the 69.9% bacterial load reduction and results superior to those of methylene blue and toluidine blue, the present authors hypothesize that tannin may be indi- cated in cases of persistent E. faecalis infection. Tannins are easily extracted from plants such as guava tree, ‘espinheira-santa’ (Maytenus sp., Celastraceae), and Bra- zilian peppertree at a low cost. So, they have become a highly promising dye for use in aPDT. Curcumin is a pigment extracted from Curcuma Longa, a plant used as a spice in cuisine that also has anti-inflammatory, antitumor, antifungal, antibacterial, and anticarcinogenic properties, in addition to antiviral effects against hepatitis B and H1N1 viruses. It has an antimicrobial effect against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria when used in aPDT and can be purchased at a compounding pharmacy. Cur- cumin has the advantage of being activated by a blue spectral range between 455 nm and 492 nm, which allows for the use of LED or halogen light devices12. In this study, the curcumin group (Group 6) showed a marked standard deviation and the 95,4% bacteria reduction was not statistically significant. Da Frota et al.12 (2015) evaluated the efficacy of aPDT using curcumin in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from root canals, varying the time of LED irradiation (5 or 10 min) after 5 min of pre-irradia- tion time. They observed that 5min reduced more bacterial viability than 10 min LED irradiation. Mahdi et al.39 (2015) investigated the effect of aPDT using a combination of curcumin (60 μM), H2O2 (0.3 mM), and erythrosine (22 μM) in planktonic cultures of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum and observed a 100% bacterial reduction after 5 min of blue light activation (450 nm). In sum, the control group 2 (CMP with saline) and group 3 (CMP + aPDT with meth- ylene blue) showed no reduction in CFUs. All other groups showed bacterial reduc- tion between the initial and final collections, but group 6 (CMP + aPDT with cur- cumin) had a marked standard deviation and a not statistically significant reduction. Group 5 (CMP + aPDT with tannin) showed the best results, introducing tannin as an alternative dye with less toxicity and good antibacterial activity. Despite the fact of all advances in rotary and reciprocating instruments, microbiology should always be the focus of endodontic treatment. It is well- known these instruments become instrumentation of radicular canal faster, reducing clinical time. In addition, stud- ies have shown effectiveness of these instruments systems on microbial reduction40. However, the present authors have a concern if clinicians and specialists are, in fact, irri- gating successfully in such reduced clinical time. aPDT emerges in this scenario improv- ing and ensuring microbial load reducton inside radicular system canal. This study pres- ents tannin and curcumin as alternatives to methylene blue and toluidine blue, showing promising results. However, randomized controlled trials are warranted to further test them in aPDT given their scientific relevance. Alternative photosensitizers and other con- centrations in aPDT should be the focus of further in vitro and in vivo studies. 9 Braz et al. In conclusion, aPDT using a wavelength of 660  nm, 100  mW as light source during 180s in association with toluidine blue or tannin at a 0.005% concentration used as an adjunct to CMP with 2.5% NaOCl reduced E. faecalis significantly. Methylene blue at a 0.005% concentration and curcumin did not promote microbial reduction. Author Disclosure Statement Financial disclosure: The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this arti- cle to disclose Conflict of Interest: No competing financial interests exist. References 1. Orstavik D. Time-course and risk analyses of the development and healing of chronic apical periodontitis in man. Int Endod J. 1996 May;29(3):150-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01361.x. 2. Asnaashari M, Ashraf H, Rahmati A, Amini N. A comparison between effect of photodynamic therapy by LED and calcium hydroxide therapy for root canal disinfection against Enterococcus faecalis: a randomized controlled trial. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2017 Mar;17:226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.12.009. 3. Pinheiro SL, Silva CCD, Silva LAD, Cicotti MP, Bueno CEDS, Fontana CE, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine, and ozonated water as irrigants in mesiobuccal root canals with severe curvature of mandibular molars. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):94-9. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_324_17. 4. Kim S, Baek S. The microscope and endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 2004 Jan;48(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.001. 5. Pourhajibagher M, Bahador A. Adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy to conventional chemo-mechanical debridement of infected root canal systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Jun;26:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.02.009. 6. Bouillaguet S, Wataha JC, Zapata O, Campo M, Lange N, Schrenzel J. Production of reactive oxygen species from photosensitizers activated with visible light sources available in dental offices. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Aug;28(4):519-25. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2505. 7. Ricci Donato HA, Pratavieira S, Grecco C, Brugnera-Júnior A, Bagnato VS, Kurachi C. Clinical Comparison of Two Photosensitizers for Oral Cavity Decontamination. Photomed Laser Surg. 2017 Feb;35(2):105-10. doi: 10.1089/pho.2016.4114. 8. Lambrechts SA, Aalders MC, Van Marle J. Mechanistic study of the photodynamic inactivation of Candida albicans by a cationic porphyrin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 May;49(5):2026-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.2026-2034.2005. 9. Fimple JL, Fontana CR, Foschi F, Ruggiero K, Song X, Pagonis TC, Tanner AC, Kent R, Doukas AG, Stashenko PP, Soukos NS. Photodynamic treatment of endodontic polymicrobial infection in vitro. J Endod. 2008 Jun;34(6):728-34. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.011. 10. Asongalem EA, Foyet HS, Ngogang J, Folefoc GN, Dimo T, Kamtchouing P. Analgesic and antiinflammatory activities of Erigeron floribundus. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004 Apr;91(2-3):301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.01.010. 11. Moghadamtousi SZ, Kadir HA, Hassandarvish P, Tajik H, Abubakar S, Zandi K. A review on antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal activity of curcumin. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:186864. doi: 10.1155/2014/186864. 10 Braz et al. 12. da Frota MF, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M, Bagnato VS, Espir CG, Berbert FL. Photodynamic therapy in root canals contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis using curcumin as photosensitizer. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Sep;30(7):1867-72. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1696-z. 13. Pourhajibagher M, Kazemian H, Chiniforush N, Hosseini N, Pourakbari B, Azizollahi A, et al. Exploring different photosensitizers to optimize elimination of planktonic and biofilm forms of Enterococcus faecalis from infected root canal during antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2018 Dec;24:206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.09.014. 14. Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Jacinto RC, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Souza-Filho FJ. Microbial analysis of canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions using polymerase chain reaction. J Endod. 2008 May;34(5):537-40. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.016. 15. Simonsen GS, Småbrekke L, Monnet DL, Sørensen TL, Møller JK, Kristinsson KG, et al. Prevalence of resistance to ampicillin, gentamicin and vancomycin in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates from clinical specimens and use of antimicrobials in five Nordic hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Feb;51(2):323-31. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg052. 16. Silva Garcez A, Núñez SC, Lage-Marques JL, Jorge AO, Ribeiro MS. Efficiency of NaOCl and laser-assisted photosensitization on the reduction of Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Oct;102(4):e93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.02.015. 17. Dametto FR, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, de Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro assessment of the immediate and prolonged antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Jun;99(6):768-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.08.026. 18. Bonsor SJ, Nichol R, Reid TM, Pearson GJ. An alternative regimen for root canal disinfection. Br Dent J. 2006 Jul 22;201(2):101-5; discussion 98; quiz 120. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813819. Erratum in: Br Dent J. 2005 Oct 21;201(8):512. 19. Soukos NS, Chen PS, Morris JT, Ruggiero K, Abernethy AD, Som S, et al. Photodynamic therapy for endodontic disinfection. J Endod. 2006 Oct;32(10):979-84. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.007. 20. Seal GJ, Ng YL, Spratt D, Bhatti M, Gulabivala K. An in vitro comparison of the bactericidal efficacy of lethal photosensitization or sodium hyphochlorite irrigation on Streptococcus intermedius biofilms in root canals. Int Endod J. 2002 Mar;35(3):268-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00477.x. 21. Fonseca MB, Tessare Júnior PO, Pallota RC, Ferreira Filho H, Denardin OV, Rapoport A, et al. Photodynamic therapy for root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Photomed Laser Surg. 2008 Jun;26(3):209-13. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2124. 22. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Santos SR, Lima KC, Magalhães FA, de Uzeda M. Efficacy of instrumentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod. 2002 Mar;28(3):181-4. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00009. 23. Berber VB, Gomes BP, Sena NT, Vianna ME, Ferraz CC, Zaia AA, et al. Efficacy of various concentrations of NaOCl and instrumentation techniques in reducing Enterococcus faecalis within root canals and dentinal tubules. Int Endod J. 2006 Jan;39(1):10-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01038.x. 24. Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):424-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00410.x. 25. Peters LB, van Winkelhoff AJ, Buijs JF, Wesselink PR. Effects of instrumentation, irrigation and dressing with calcium hydroxide on infection in pulpless teeth with periapical bone lesions. Int Endod J. 2002 Jan;35(1):13-21. doi: 10.1046/j.0143-2885.2001.00447.x. 26. Sassone LM, Fidel RA, Fidel SR, Dias M, Hirata RJ. Antimicrobial activity of different concentrations of NaOCl and chlorhexidine using a contact test. Braz Dent J. 2003;14(2):99-102. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402003000200005. 11 Braz et al. 27. Guivarc’h M, Ordioni U, Ahmed HM, Cohen S, Catherine JH, Bukiet F. Sodium hypochlorite accident: a systematic review. J Endod. 2017 Jan;43(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.023. 28. Vianna ME, Gomes BP, Berber VB, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, de Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Jan;97(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(03)00360-3. 29. Menezes MM, Valera MC, Jorge AO, Koga-Ito CY, Camargo CH, Mancini MN. In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of irrigants and intracanal medicaments on microorganisms within root canals. Int Endod J. 2004 May;37(5):311-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00799.x. 30. Vianna ME, Horz HP, Gomes BP, Conrads G. In vivo evaluation of microbial reduction after chemo-mechanical preparation of human root canals containing necrotic pulp tissue. Int Endod J. 2006 Jun;39(6):484-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01121.x. 31. Garcez AS, Nuñez SC, Hamblin MR, Ribeiro MS. Antimicrobial effects of photodynamic therapy on patients with necrotic pulps and periapical lesion. J Endod. 2008 Feb;34(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j. joen.2007.10.020. 32. Siqueira JF Jr, Paiva SS, Rôças IN. Reduction in the cultivable bacterial populations in infected root canals by a chlorhexidine-based antimicrobial protocol. J Endod. 2007 May;33(5):541-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.008. 33. Wainwright M. Photodynamic therapy: the development of new photosensitisers. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2008 Apr;8(3):280-91. doi: 10.2174/187152008783961888. 34. Ghinzelli GC, Souza MA, Cecchin D, Farina AP, de Figueiredo JA. Influence of ultrasonic activation on photodynamic therapy over root canal system infected with Enterococcus faecalis--an in vitro study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2014 Dec;11(4):472-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.07.004. 35. Wang Y, Huang X. Comparative antibacterial efficacy of photodynamic therapy and ultrasonic irrigation against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Photochem Photobiol. 2014 Sep-Oct;90(5):1084-8. doi: 10.1111/php.12293. 36. Rödig T, Endres S, Konietschke F, Zimmermann O, Sydow HG, Wiegand A. Effect of fiber insertion depth on antibacterial efficacy of photodynamic therapy against Enterococcus faecalis in rootcanals. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1753-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1948-3. 37. Lam M, Jou PC, Lattif AA, Lee Y, Malbasa CL, Mukherjee PK, et al. Photodynamic therapy with Pc 4 induces apoptosis of Candida albicans. Photochem Photobiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;87(4):904-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00938.x. 38. Verza SG, Silveira F, Cibulski S, Kaiser S, Ferreira F, Gosmann G, et al. Immunoadjuvant activity, toxicity assays, and determination by UPLC/Q-TOF-MS of triterpenic saponins from Chenopodium quinoa seeds. J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Mar;60(12):3113-8. doi: 10.1021/jf205010c. 39. Mahdi Z, Habiboallh G, Mahbobeh NN, Mina ZJ, Majid Z, Nooshin A. Lethal effect of blue light-activated hydrogen peroxide, curcumin and erythrosine as potential oral photosensitizers on the viability of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Laser Ther. 2015 Mar 31;24(2):103-11. doi: 10.5978/islsm.15-OR-0. 40. Siddique R, Nivedhitha MS. Effectiveness of rotary and reciprocating systems on microbial reduction: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Mar-Apr;22(2):114-22. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_523_18.