1

Volume 21
2022
e228274

Original Article

Braz J Oral Sci. 2022;21:e228274http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8668274

1 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, 
School of dentistry, Ahvaz 
Jundishapur University of Medical 
Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. 

2 Department of Orthodontics, 
School of dentistry, Ahvaz 
Jundishapur University of Medical 
Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. 

3 Infectious and Tropical Diseases 
Research Center, Health Research 
Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur 
University of Medical Sciences, 
Ahvaz, Iran. 

Corresponding author:  
Samaneh Khanehmasjedi  
Address: Infectious and Tropical 
Diseases Research Center, 
Health Research Institute, Ahvaz 
Jundishapur University of Medical 
Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran 
Phone number: 00989169225100 
E-mail: masjedi.samaneh@yahoo.com;  
khanehmasjedi.s@ajums.ac.ir

Editor: Dr. Altair A. Del Bel Cury

Received: January 31, 2022

Accepted: April 13, 2022

Knowledge, attitudes, and 
practices regarding the 
oral health of children: 
a cross-sectional study 
among iranian parents
Leila Basir1 , Mashallah Khanehmasjedi2 , 
Samaneh Khanehmasjedi3,*

Parents are responsible for their children’s health care, and their 
oral health-related knowledge, attitude, and habits can affect 
their children’s oral health. Aim: The objective of this study 
was to evaluate parents’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices 
regarding their children’s oral health. Methods: In this study, a 
sample of 398 parents of 4- to 6-year-old children completed 
a self-designed questionnaire. The parents’ oral health-related 
knowledge, attitudes, and practices were assessed. Children’s 
oral health was evaluated using decayed, missing, and filled 
tooth index (dmft). Data were analyzed using the SPSS version 
23.0 with a p < 0.05 as statistically significant. Categorical data 
were reported as frequency (%), and continuous data were 
reported as mean ± SD. Moreover, Spearman’s correlation, 
multiple regression, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal Wallis test, 
and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test were used. Results: Most 
of the parents had a satisfactory level of knowledge and 
positive attitudes regarding their children’s oral health. The 
knowledge and attitude scores were higher among parents 
with higher education (p<0.001), and the knowledge score 
was higher among mothers (p=0.004). Also, the attitude score 
was correlated with the number of decayed, missed, and filled 
teeth of children (p=0.01, p=0.04, and p=0.007, respectively). 
However, there was no significant relationship between dmft 
and the parents’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices using 
multiple regression. The mean dmft of children was 6.86 ± 3.56, 
and most of the parents had poor oral health-related practices. 
Conclusion: The parents’ level of knowledge and attitudes were 
satisfactory, but they had poor oral health practices. Moreover, 
there was no significant relationship between children’s oral 
health and their parents’ level of knowledge, attitudes, and 
practices. Educating programs and strategies are needed to 
enhance parents’ oral health-related attitudes and knowledge 
and, more importantly, change their oral health practices.

Keywords: Knowledge. Habits. Health behavior. Dental caries. 
Tooth, deciduous. 

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57190230828
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1684-1774
https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=55753667000
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9537-5339
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-7773
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-7773


2

Basir et al.

Braz J Oral Sci. 2022;21:e228274

Introduction

Oral health as an essential part of overall health1 has been the center of atten-
tion of researchers for many years. However, compared to general health, little 
significance is given to it2. In young children, dental caries is an essential facet of 
oral health3, related to many risk factors such as poor oral hygiene and a highly  
cariogenic diet4.

Regardless of numerous strategies and interventions to promote oral health and pre-
vent dental caries, evidence shows that the prevalence of dental caries has increased 
among children in Middle Eastern countries5. According to a recent meta-analysis, 
the mean dmft of children in Iran was 3.866.

Parents play a crucial part in maintaining good oral health in preschool children. Due 
to manual incompetency, preschoolers cannot clean their teeth, and due to mental 
immaturity, they are ignorant of the importance of preserving their teeth7. Moreover, 
children under six spend most of their time with their parents, and through a period 
that is called “primary socialization,” they acquire their parents’ everyday routines 
(including health behaviors)8.9. 

It has been reported that parents’ oral health-related knowledge, attitudes, and prac-
tices can affect their children’s oral health3,10,11. Therefore, parents must have favor-
able oral health behaviors and satisfactory knowledge and attitude to inculcate nec-
essary oral health habits in their children12.

Since the prevalence of dental caries in children has increased over the last 15 years 
in Iran5, it is important to assess parents’ knowledge and attitudes to discover which 
aspects need improvement to enhance children’s oral health11. Therefore, in this 
study, we intended to evaluate parents’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding 
their 4- to 6-year-old children’s oral health. Our null hypothesis was that Iranian par-
ents had low-to-moderate levels of knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Methods
This study was conducted under the STROBE guidelines13.

Ethical approval

The Ethic Committee of the Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences 
approved this study (IR.AJUMS.REC.1397.559). Additionally, after explaining the pur-
pose of the study, written informed consent was obtained from the parents.

Study sample and design  

This was an analytical, cross-sectional study conducted on an initial sample of 414 
subjects (using Cochran formula, α=0.05, β=0.2, pilot sampling variance=0.52, and 
minimum effect size=0.1) selected using the convenience sampling method. The 
inclusion criteria were parents of 4- to 6-year-old healthy children presenting to the 
department of pediatric dentistry, school of dentistry, the Ahvaz Jundishapur Uni-
versity of Medical Sciences. The exclusion criteria were the presence of any disease 



3

Basir et al.

Braz J Oral Sci. 2022;21:e228274

and the usage of orthodontic appliances. The sample was recruited in the fall of 
2019, from October 9th to December 15th. 

Data collection

Parents’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding their children’s oral health 
were assessed using a self-designed questionnaire based on previous studies14. 
Before the study, ten pediatric dentists and health education specialists vali-
dated the questionnaire, and based on their review, modifications were made. The 
test-retest method was used to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaire. For 
this purpose, the questions were given to the parents (not included in the main 
study) in two terms with a two-week interval. Cronbach’s α (0.81) confirmed the  
questionnaire’s reliability15,16.

The questionnaire consisted of four sections: 1) demographic data of parents and 
their children (age and gender of the accompanying parent, their level of education, 
their occupation, their source of acquiring oral health-related information, and age 
and gender of the child), 2) knowledge section (10 questions), 3) attitude section (ten 
statements), and 4) oral health-related practices (three statements). The knowledge 
section included ten multiple-choice questions regarding the etiology of dental caries, 
the importance of primary teeth, fluoride, oral health, oral health-related practices, 
and the time of the permanent teeth eruption. Each correct answer scored a point. 
The maximum score for this section was 10 points. It was further categorized as 
unsatisfactory, less than 6 points (the median), and satisfactory, 6 points and above. 
The attitude section was a five-point Likert scale that included ten statements from 
“strongly agree” to “strongly disagree” regarding primary teeth eruption and caries, 
oral health-related practices, and nutrition of children under six. The response of 
each statement was given a value from 1 to 5, with the response anchors having 1 
or 5 points. The maximum score of the attitude section was 50, and the minimum 
was 10 points. This score was also categorized as negative, less than 36 points (the 
median), and positive, 36 points and above. The practices section included four bina-
ry-option questions on the frequency of children’s tooth brushing, flossing, dental 
visits, and whether they ever had a fluoride varnish. The questions were rated using 
“yes,” “no,” and “don’t know” on a modified Likert scale. Approximately 10 min was 
required to fill out the questionnaire.

A calibrated pediatric dentist examined the children’s oral health status to evaluate 
the children’s oral health status. According to the WHO standard diagnostic criteria, 
the dmft index was obtained by calculating the number of decayed, missing, and filled 
primary teeth17.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical software (version 23.0, IBM Corpo-
ration, Armonk, NY, USA) with a p < 0.05 as statistically significant. Categorical data 
were reported as frequency (%), and continuous data were reported as mean ± SD. 
Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic tested the normal distribution of variables. Spear-
man’s correlation coefficient was used to discover possible correlations between 
variables. Mann-Whitney U (two-category variables) and Kruskal Wallis (more than 



4

Basir et al.

Braz J Oral Sci. 2022;21:e228274

two-category variables) evaluated the mean differences in knowledge, attitude, and 
dmft scores between different groups. Multiple regression was used to indicate 
whether there was a relationship between dmft and parents’ knowledge, attitudes, 
and practices.

Results
Questionnaires with unanswered questions were excluded to secure authentic results, 
and the final sample size included 398 completed questionnaires (the response rate 
was 96.13%). In total, 207 mothers (52.0%) and 191 fathers (48.0%) participated in 
the study. Of the children, 200 (50.3%) were girls and 198 (49.7%) were boys, and their 
mean age was 5.16 ± 0.77. Of the mothers, 83 (40%) were unemployed. Other demo-
graphic data are presented in Table 1.

The mean knowledge score of the parents was 5.81 ± 1.62 (females: 6.009 ± 1.59, 
males: 5.602 ± 1.63), and 57% of them had a satisfactory level of knowledge. The 
mothers had a significantly higher knowledge score (Mann-Whitney U; p = 0.004). 
There was a statistically significant difference between the mean knowledge scores 

Table 1. Frequency distribution of the demographic data of the participating parents

Demographic data n (%)

Age (years)

20-29 65 (16.3)

30-39 259 (65.1)

40-49 74 (18.6)

Occupation

employed 197 (49.5)

self-employed 83 (20.9)

Laborer 29 (7.3)

unemployed 89 (22.4)

Education

Higher education 254 (63.8)

High school diploma or less 144 (36.2)

Source of oral health-related information*

Dentist 222 (55.7)

Magazines 1 (0.2)

Personal experience 40 (10.0)

TV 50 (12.5)

Family & friends 57 (14.3)

Internet 84 (21.1)

* 46 participants chose more than one source of oral health-related knowledge



5

Basir et al.

Braz J Oral Sci. 2022;21:e228274

of parents from different age groups. It was higher among parents aged 30-39 years 
(Kruskal Wallis; p= 0.007). The mean knowledge score was also higher among par-
ents with higher education (Mann-Whitney U; p< 0.001) and correlated with the mean 
attitude score (Spearman’s correlation; p< 0.001). However, there was no significant 
relationship between dmft and the parents’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices using 
multiple regression (p>0.05) and (Table 2). Table 3 shows the knowledge questions 
and the frequency of the parents’ true or false answers.

The mean attitude score of the parents was 35.60 ± 4.97 (females: 35.97 ± 4.86, 
males: 35.21 ± 5.07), and 54.3% of them had positive attitudes regarding their chil-
dren’s oral health. This score was significantly higher among parents with higher edu-
cation (Mann-Whitney U; p< 0.001). In addition, it was correlated with the number of 
decayed, missing, and filled teeth of the children (Spearman’s correlation; p= 0.01, 
p= 0.04, and p= 0.007, respectively). Table 4 shows the questionnaire’s statements 
regarding the parents’ attitudes and the frequency of their answers. 

Table 5 shows Spearman’s correlation between the parents’ knowledge and attitude 
scores and the children’s dmft score, and the parents’ practices regarding their chil-
dren’s oral health are presented in Table 6.

Table 2. Multiple regression between the dmft index and the parents’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices

Variable Coefficient (β) p-value

constant 8.230 <0.001

knowledge 0.002 0.984

attitude -0.037 0.331

practice -0.061 0.743

Table 3. Frequency distribution of the parents’ knowledge regarding their children’s oral health

Questions True (%) False (%)

1- What causes dental caries? 193 (48.5) 205 (51.5)

2- What is the importance of primary teeth? 253 (63.9) 145 (36.4)

3- Which one is more effective in the incidence of dental caries? 369 (92.7) 29 (7.3)

4- Which one is more effective in preventing dental caries? 178 (44.7) 220 (55.3)

5- What is the color of healthy gums? 348 (87.4) 50 (12.6)

6- What is the best instrument to clean the interdental surfaces? 314 (78.9) 84 (21.1)

7- From what age can we use fluoride-containing toothpaste for children? 68 (17.1) 330 (82.9)

8- From what age can we use fluoride-containing mouthwashes for children? 186 (46.7) 212 (53.3)

9- How many times a day should children brush their teeth? 119 (29.9) 279 (70.1)

10- At what age does the first permanent tooth erupt? 286 (71.9) 112 (28.1)



6

Basir et al.

Braz J Oral Sci. 2022;21:e228274

Table 4. Frequency distribution of the parents’ attitudes regarding their children’s oral health

Statement 
Strongly 

disagree (%)
Disagree 

(%)
Neutral 

(%)
Agree (%)

Strongly 
agree (%)

1- Going to the dentist for children under 
6 is a waste of time.

214 (53.8) 118 (29.6) 26 (6.5) 16 (4.1) 24 (6.0)

2- Gargling with salt water is a good 
alternative for children who do not brush 
their teeth.

41 (10.3) 85 (21.4) 107 (26.9) 132 (33.1) 33 (8.3)

3- Experience has shown that infants 
who use breast milk are less likely to 
develop caries.

33 (8.3) 71 (17.8) 85 (21.4) 92 (23.1) 117 (29.4)

4- Mouthwashes have no protective effect 
on primary teeth.

53 (13.3) 122 (30.7) 154 (38.7) 47 (11.8) 22 (5.5)

5- It is not necessary to visit a dentist for 
check-ups for a child who is brushing.

99 (24.9) 205 (51.5) 41 (10.3) 34 (8.5) 19 (4.8)

6- The cause of early dental caries in 
children is neglecting tooth brushing and 
using floss.

7 (1.8) 48 (12.0) 31 (7.8) 148 (37.2) 164 (41.2)

7- All permanent teeth erupt as a 
substitute for primary teeth.

20 (5.1) 36 (9.0) 79 (19.8) 164 (41.2) 99 (24.9)

8- Only in case of pain should children be 
referred to a dentist.

111 (27.9) 207 (25.1) 17 (4.3) 41 (10.2) 22 (5.5)

9- If the child has a decayed tooth, I prefer 
for the tooth to be extracted.

144 (36.2) 174 (43.7) 42 (10.6) 24 (6.0) 4 (3.5)

10- Proper nutrition in children is very 
effective in maintaining healthy teeth.

2 (0.5) 4 (1.0) 10 (2.5) 136 (34.2) 246 (61.8)

Table 5. Spearman’s correlation between the parents’ knowledge and attitude scores and children’s 
dmft score

Variable
Knowledge 

score
Attitude 

score
dmft d m f

Knowledge score 1 0.315** -0.309 -0.074 -0.032 0.094

Attitude score 1 -0.079 -0.121* -0.100* 0.134**

dmft 1 0.836** 0.172** 0.085

d 1 -0.175** -0.325**

m 1 0.205**

f 1

* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01

Table 6. Frequency distribution of the parents’ practices regarding their children’s oral health

Questions  Yes (%) No (%) Don’t know (%)

Do you brush your child’s teeth twice a day? 98 (24.6) 288 (72.4) 12 (3)

Do you floss your child’s teeth daily? 56 (14.1) 326 (81.9) 16 (4)

Do you take your child to dental check-ups every six m.? 84 (21.1) 288 (72.4) 26 (6.5)

Has your child ever had a fluoride varnish? 109 (27.4) 255 (64.1) 34 (8.5)



7

Basir et al.

Braz J Oral Sci. 2022;21:e228274

The mean dmft of the children was calculated 6.86 ± 3.56 (d = 6.01 ± 3.69,  
m = 0.38 ± 0.97, f = 0.46 ± 1.26). As demonstrated in Table 7, the dmft mean was  
higher among boys (p = 0.80). Also, the number of filled teeth increased with the 
child’s age (Kruskal Wallis; p = 0.009). Only 3.5% (n = 14) of the children were  
caries-free.

Discussion
Through this study, which intended to evaluate parents’ knowledge, attitudes, and 
practices regarding their children’s oral health, we discovered that the majority of par-
ents of 4- to 6-year-old children had a satisfactory level of knowledge and positive 
attitudes but poor practices in this regard.

In the present study, more than half of the parents had a satisfactory level of knowl-
edge. The knowledge score was higher among the mothers, as stated by previous 
studies7,18. A conflicting study by Mehdipour et al. reported that 51.1% of the Iranian 
parents had poor knowledge about the care of primary teeth13. This difference can 
be due to the level of education of the participants in that study, of which only 38.2% 
had higher education. In our study, more than 60% of the parents were university edu-
cated. Similar to our results, it is generally accepted that individuals with higher levels 
of education have a higher oral health knowledge and a better understanding of their 
overall health8,17 (Appendix 1).

Regarding attitude in the present study, most of the parents had positive attitudes 
about their children’s oral health. In a study conducted by Dhull et al., the overall 
attitude of Indian mothers regarding the oral health care of their children was poor, 
which may be a result of their low education19. Consistent with our result, it has been 
reported that the attitude of individuals is related to their education level1,12. More-
over, similar to the study by Mehdipour et al.14, in our study, parents with a higher 
knowledge score had a higher attitude score. Additionally, children whose parents 
had a higher attitude score had better oral health. That is, they had fewer decayed and 
missed teeth and more filled teeth. This is mainly important because children with 
less caries experience have a higher oral health-related quality of life. Furthermore, 
untreated caries affects children’s oral and general health20 (Appendix 2).

In the present study, 29.9% of the parents knew that children should brush their 
teeth twice a day, and about a quarter of the children did so. Complementary results 

Table 7. Descriptive statistics of the dmft index among girls and boys of the study sample

Variable 
mean + SD

p*
Girls Boys

dmft 6.82 ± 3.46 6.91 ± 3.67 0.80

d 5.96 ± 3.59 6.07 ± 3.79 0.96

m 0.32 ± 0.90 0.45 ± 1.04 0.13

f 0.54 ± 1.43 0.38 ± 1.06 0.30

* Mann-Whitney U



8

Basir et al.

Braz J Oral Sci. 2022;21:e228274

have been found in a study in Saudi Arabia3. Contrary to a study by Kameli et al.21, 
our result showed that about three-fourths of the parents knew flossing was the 
best way to clean the interdental surfaces, but less than 15% of the children used 
dental floss daily. Since parents in the mentioned study were mostly housewife 
mothers, it can be reasoned that they had more free time to spend caring for their 
children. However, more than half of the mothers in our study were either employed 
or self-employed. We found that only about 27% of the children have had a fluoride 
varnish application. As reported by a study, less than 10% of the children in Trinidad 
have had fluoride varnish applied to their teeth9. Moreover, only about 15% of the 
parents in this study believed that children should visit dentists only in case of pain. 
Nevertheless, only about 20% took their children for a dental visit every six months. 
Similarly, Ramakrishnan et al. stated that 18% of Indian parents took their children 
for regular dental check-ups. At the same time, the majority of them preferred tak-
ing their children to the dentist only if they were in pain10.

Given the evidence, even though most of the parents had a satisfactory level of 
knowledge and positive attitudes toward their children’s oral health, most of them 
could not translate this knowledge and attitudes into good oral practices to main-
tain their children’s oral health. As a result, dental caries had a 96.5% prevalence in 
children in this study. This neglect toward children’s oral health can be the result 
of daily workload, expenses of dental care, fear of dental treatments, and past  
painful experiences 8,22. 

For interested readers, a detailed description of each question and statement of the 
questionnaire is presented in the Appendix.

This was a cross-sectional study, and all the limitations of this type of study should 
be considered. Also, regarding oral health practices, since our data were collected 
through a questionnaire, parents may have given socially desired answers rather than 
describing their real habits.

In conclusion, the parents’ level of knowledge and attitudes were satisfactory, but 
they had poor oral health practices. Moreover, we found no significant relationship 
between the children’s oral health and their parents’ level of knowledge, attitudes, and 
practices. Our findings give an insight into parents’ knowledge, attitudes, and prac-
tices and can be of great importance to policymakers to develop strategies that can 
improve oral health-related behaviors of the population. Future research can focus 
not only on education programs and strategies needed to improve parents’ attitudes 
and increase their knowledge but also on changing their oral health practices.

Acknowledgment
The Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences financially supported this 
study. The authors thank Dr. Saki for her assistance with statistical analysis.

Author Contribution
Study concept and design: L.B. and M.Kh.; acquisition of data: L.B.; analysis and inter-
pretation of data: L.B. and M.Kh.; drafting of the manuscript: S.Kh.; critical revision of 



9

Basir et al.

Braz J Oral Sci. 2022;21:e228274

the manuscript for important intellectual content: L.B. and M.Kh.; statistical analysis: 
S.Kh. All authors actively participated in the discussion of the manuscript’s findings, 
and have revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. However, they state that they have a 
familial connection; that is, S.Kh. is L.B. and M.Kh.’s daughter.

References

1. Mahmoud N, Kowash M, Hussein I, Hassan A, Al Halabi M. Oral health knowledge, attitude, and 
practices of Sharjah mothers of preschool children, United Arab Emirates. J Int Soc Prev Community 
Dent. 2017;7(6):308-14. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_310_17.

2. Vanobbergen J, Lesaffre E, Garcia-Zattera M, Jara A, Martens L, Declerck D. Caries patterns in 
primary dentition in 3-, 5-and 7-year-old children: spatial correlation and preventive consequences. 
Caries Res. 2007;41(1):16-25. doi: 10.1159/000096101.

3. Salama F, Alwohaibi A, Alabdullatif A, Alnasser A, Hafiz Z. Knowledge, behaviours and beliefs 
of parents regarding the oral health of their children. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(2):103-9. 
doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2020.21.02.03.

4. Harris R, Nicoll AD, Adair PM, Pine CM. Risk factors for dental caries in young children: a systematic 
review of the literature. Community Dent Health. 2004 Mar;21(1 Suppl):71-85. 

5. Elamin A, Garemo M, Mulder A. Determinants of dental caries in children in the Middle East and 
North Africa region: a systematic review based on literature published from 2000 to 2019. BMC Oral 
Health. 2021;21(1):1-30. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01482-7.

6. Soltani MR. Dental caries status and its related factors in Iran: a meta-analysis. J Dent (Shiraz).  
2020 Sep;21(3):158-76. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.82596.1024.

7. Suma Sogi HP, Hugar SM, Nalawade TM, Sinha A, Hugar S, Mallikarjuna RM. Knowledge, 
attitude, and practices of oral health care in prevention of early childhood caries among parents 
of children in Belagavi city: A Questionnaire study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2016;5(2):286-90. 
doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.192332.

8. Kotha SB, Alabdulaali RA, Dahy WT, Alkhaibari YR, Albaraki ASM, Alghanim AF. The influence 
of oral health knowledge on parental practices among the Saudi parents of children aged 
2–6 years in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018;8(6):565-71. 
doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_341_18.

9. Naidu RS, Nunn JH. Oral health knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of parents and caregivers of 
preschool children: implications for oral health promotion. Oral Health Prev Dent.  
2020 Apr;18(1):245-52. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a43357.

10. Ramakrishnan M, Banu S, Ningthoujam S, Samuel VA. Evaluation of knowledge and attitude 
of parents about the importance of maintaining primary dentition-A cross-sectional study. 
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Feb;8(2):414-8. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_371_18.

11. Setty JV, Srinivasan I. Knowledge and awareness of primary teeth and their importance 
among parents in Bengaluru City, India. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(1):56-61. 
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1334.

12. Gurunathan D, Moses J, Arunachalam SK. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of mothers regarding 
oral hygiene of primary school children in chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 
2018;11(4):338-43. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1535. 



10

Basir et al.

Braz J Oral Sci. 2022;21:e228274

13. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The 
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: 
guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9. 
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.

14. Mehdipour A, Montazeri Hedeshi R, Asayesh H, Karimi A, Omidi Kopayee R, Asgari H. [Evaluation 
of knowledge, attitudes and performance of the parents of preschool and primary school children 
referred to health centers of Qom city about the importance of preserving primary teeth and its 
related factors, Iran]. Qom Uni Med Sci J. 2016 [cited 2022 Feb 2];10(6):94-105. Persian. Available 
form: https://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-1098-en.pdf. 

15. Alshehri A, Nasim V. Infant oral health care knowledge and awareness among parents in Abha city of 
Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Dent Res. 2015;6(2):98-101. doi: 10.1016/j.sjdr.2015.01.001.

16. Mohamed YS. Assessment Of The knowledge and awareness among egyptian parents 
in relation to oral health status of their children. Egypt Dent J. 2020;66(2):737-46. 
doi: 10.21608/EDJ.2020.25196.1058.

17. Chen L, Hong J, Xiong D, Zhang L, Li Y, Huang S, Hua F. Are parents’ education levels associated with 
either their oral health knowledge or their children’s oral health behaviors? A survey of 8446 families 
in Wuhan. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jul;20(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01186-4.

18. Nagarajappa R, Kakatkar G, Sharda AJ, Asawa K, Ramesh G, Sandesh N. Infant oral health: 
Knowledge, attitude and practices of parents in Udaipur, India. Dent Res J (Isfahan).  
2013 Sep;10(5):659-65.

19. Dhull KS, Dutta B, Devraj IM, Samir P. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of mothers towards infant 
oral healthcare. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;11(5):435-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1553.

20. Duangthip D, Gao SS, Chen KJ, Lo ECM, Chu CH. Oral health-related quality of life and caries 
experience of Hong Kong preschool children. Int Dent J. 2020;70(2):100-7. doi: 10.1111/idj.12526.

21. Kameli S, Mehdipour A, Montazeri Hedeshi R, Nourelahi M. [Evaluation of parental knowledge, 
attitudes and practices in preschool children on importance of primary teeth and some related 
factors among subjects attending semnan university of medical sciences dental clinic]. Koomesh. 
2017 [cited 2022 Feb 2];19(1):191-8. Persian. Available from: http://eprints.semums.ac.ir/1083/1/
Koomesh-v19n1p191-en.pdf.

22. Sanguida A, Vinothini V, Prathima GS, Santhadevy A, Premlal K, Kavitha M. Age and reasons 
for first dental visit and knowledge and attitude of parents toward dental procedures for 
Puducherry children aged 0–9 years. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 May;11(Suppl 2):S413-9. 
doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_54_19.