id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
bjos-8668152	Vargas-Moreno, Vanessa Felipe; Gomes , Rafael Soares; Ribeiro, Michele Costa de Oliveira; Freitas , Mariana Itaborai Moreira; Del Bel Cury , Altair Antoninha; Marcello-Machado, Raissa Micaela; Machado, Raissa Micaela Marcelo	Influence of diameter in the stress distribution of extra-short dental implants under axial and oblique load: a finite element analysis	2023	14	.pdf	application/pdf	5507	350	62	Axial load Oblique load of 30º Axial load x Oblique load of 30º RDAL WDAL % stress RDOL WDOL % stress % RDAL/ RDOL % WDAL/ WDOL Abutment (σvM) 200.97 202.94 *3.6% 1026.9 1157.4 *12.7% *511.0% *570.3% Implant (σvM) 303.48 185.98 #38.7% 1414.4 873.4 #38.2% *466.1% *469.6% Cortical bone (τmax) 21.02 42.02 *99.8% 43.37 130.88 *201.7% *206.3% *311.5% Cortical bone (σmin) 43.53 72.34 *66.3% 118.19 266.7 *125.7% *271.5% *368.7% Cancellous bone (τmax) 16.62 7.324 #55.9% 73.5 20.66 #71.9% *442.2% *282.1% Cancellous bone (σmin) 17.78 9.795 #44.9% 94.19 25.23 #73.2% *529.8% *257.6% RDAL, regular diameter implant under axial load; WDAL, wide diameter implant under axial load; RDOL, regular diameter implant under oblique load; WDOL, wide diameter implant under oblique load; *, increased stress; #, stress decreased. The bone model had a 12.94 mm height and 16.11 mm of thickness, and a 2 mm layer of cortical bone surrounding the cancellous bone (Fig.	cache/bjos-8668152.pdf	txt/bjos-8668152.txt