Ninditya Nareswari, Nuraini Desty Nurmasari, Working Capital Management on Financially Constrained Firm 127127 Working Capital Management on Financially Constrained Firm Ninditya Nareswari1, Nuraini Desty Nurmasari2 1Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 2Universitas Gadjah Mada e-mail: ninditya@its.ac.id, nuraini.desty.n@mail.ugm.ac.id Abstract: Working capital management is a daily activity that will determine the availability of resources for the company. There are positive and negative effects in increasing the degree of working capital. There is an optimal degree as well. The degree of optimal working capital for each company is different, depends on financial conditions. This paper aims to examine the effect of non-linear working capital on firm performance and analyze the differences in the degree of opti- mal working capital between financially constrained and unconstrained firms. Data were obtained from OSIRIS with the observation period 2010–2019. Working capital is proxied by the net trade cycle. This study uses panel data regression models, i.e. fixed effect regression and random effect regression. The result of this study shows that working capital has a non-linear effect (U-shaped inverted) on firm performance when using ROA and ROE as a proxy for performance which means the company has an optimal degree of working capital. The result also shows that financially constrained firms grouped based on cash flow, interest coverage, and cost of external financing have lower optimal working capital which means that the benefits of working capital are more used by non-financially constrained firms. Keywords: financial constraints, firm performance, working capital management INTRODUCTION There are three decisions determined by financial managers to maximize the wealth of shareholders. There are investment decisions, funding decisions, and working capital deci- sions. One of the decisions that need to be considered by managers is making working capi- tal decisions and ensuring the company’s opera- tional activities run smoothly (Hanafi, 2013). Working capital decisions are significant for the company because working capital decisions di- rectly affect the company’s daily operational activities. Most of the activities of a company’s financial manager are allocated to manage cur- rent assets because there are certain types of companies, for example, manufacturing, most of their assets are current assets. There are two perspectives regarding the effect of working capital investment on firm value. The first perspective explained that high working capital can increase sales and get dis- counts to increase company value (Deloof,2003). Meanwhile, the second perspective states that high working capital requires funding and in- creases the cost.so it can increase the risk of bankruptcy (Kieschink, et.al 2011). Based on these two perspectives, it means that there is a trade-off in determining working capital deci- sions. In this condition, a firm is required to be able to determine optimal working capital. Optimal working capital is the limit to the extent to which working capital investment can have a positive effect on the company and if working capital investment exceeds the optimal degree, then working capital investment will harm the company. Financial factors such as the availability of capital costs, internal funds, and access to the capital market will affect invest- ments made by working capital management. Business and Finance Journal, Volume 6, No. 2, October 2021 128 Banos -Caballero et al. (2013) argue that opti- mal working capital for financially constrained firms will be lower than financially unconstrained firms. The imperfect market hypothesis ex- plains that external funding is not the best substitute for internal funding because it in- creases costs. That makes financially constrained firms more sensitive to working capital invest- ments. When increasing inventory, financially con- strained firms tend to rely on account payables because they will face difficulties to access exter- nal funding so financially constrained firms can- not use a discount for early payments if they buy inventory in cash to a supplier. That will be dif- ferent from financially unconstrained firms. They can get a discount if they buy inventory in cash from a supplier because of having sufficient cash. They can easily access external funding, such as bank loans. The discounts provided by these sup- pliers will certainly be higher than the interest in order to attract firms to pay in cash. So, the re- search problem is a trade-off in the working capi- tal decision. Empirical evidence is needed to show that influence. In addition, there are differences in the amount of optimal working capital between financially constrained and unconstrained firms. This paper aims to (1) examine the influence of working capital on firm performance and (2) ana- lyze the differences in the level of optimal work- ing capital between financially constrained and unconstrained firms. LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT Working Capital According to Hanafi (2016), working capi- tal consists of cash, accounts receivable, and inventory. Besides, working capital also consists of current debt, including trade debt and ac- crual debt. In contrast, according to Brigham (604, 2014), working capital symbolizes the company’s assets that can be converted into cash to support the company’s operations. Ac- cording to Brigham (604, 2014), working capi- tal management relates to two fundamental questions. First, what is the right amount of working capital both the specific number of accounts and the total amount. Second, how should working capital be funded because work- ing capital is related to funding decisions, so a financial manager must decide on the company’s cash amount and the amount of short-term funding for working capital. Firm Performance Firm performance is the result obtained by the firms through actions and policies taken (Neely, 68, 2004). Performance is a term, gen- erally used for part or all of the actions and activities of an organization in a period with references to the number of standards such as past or projected costs, with the basis of effi- ciency, accountability or management account- ability and so on. Santos and Brito (2012), company performance is a result of the effec- tiveness of the company in carrying out its activities, both operational and financial. Financial Constraints Firms often face financing constraints on investing. Kaplan and Zingales (1997) suggest that financial constraints occur due to unfavourable financial liquidity and the diffi- culty of accessing external funding because they face the difference between capital costs from internal funding and capital costs from external funding. According to Fazzari et al. (1988), the existence of asymmetric information results in Ninditya Nareswari, Nuraini Desty Nurmasari, Working Capital Management on Financially Constrained Firm 129 external funding costs being more expensive than internal funding, resulting in financially constrained companies’ investment decisions tends to be more sensitive to liquidity than non- financially constrained companies. This results when the company gets an investment opportu- nity, the company will fund its investment by using internal funding then external funding because internal funding raises costs that are cheaper than external funding. The Influence of Working Capital on Firm Per- formance Higher investment in inventories and ac- counts receivable and inventory can improve com- pany performance. Companies with a more ex- tensive inventory can reduce costs and price fluc- tuations and prevent disruption of business pro- cesses (Blinder and Maccini, 1991). That also al- lows the firm to provide the best service for cus- tomers (Schiff and Lieber, 1974). Besides, giving credit can increase a company’s sales, companies can provide discounts on customers effectively, attract customers to make purchases when de- mand is low, and improve long-term relationships between suppliers and customers. Customers can ensure the quality of products and services be- fore payment so that it can reduce asymmetry information between the seller and the buyer. Emery (1984) argues that trade credit provision will be more profitable than investing in short- term securities and can be used as a liquidity re- serve to prevent future cash shortfalls. However, there are some negative impacts on investment in working capital when it has passed the optimal amount. First, higher inven- tory can increase costs such as warehouse rental fees, insurance, and security (Kim and Chung, 1990). Second, high working capital requires higher funding as well. That can increase the financial cost and opportunity cost. In compa- nies that provide high trade credit will increase credit risk. It can also lead companies to finan- cial distress and face bankruptcy (Kieschnick et al., 2011). The existence of positive and nega- tive impacts on working capital reflects trade- offs in working capital decisions. Each company must have an optimal amount of working capi- tal to balance costs and benefits to company performance. This increase in performance will be in line with the increase in working capital until the optimal amount of working capital is achieved. Conversely, when the amount of work- ing capital exceeds the optimal amount, the relationship between working capital and per- formance will be negative (Banos-Caballero et al. 2013). Based on the following explanation, this study composes the hypothesis as follows. H1: There is an inverted U-shaped impact of working capital on firm performance. The Impact of Working Capital on Financially Constrained Firm Suppose there is an inverse U parabolic effect of working capital on company perfor- mance. In that case, the optimal amount of investment in working capital will be different for companies with financial constraints and those without financial constraints. That is caused by working capital investment decisions that are strongly influenced by investment op- portunities. Financially constrained firms will have difficult access to the capital market and have fewer investment opportunities so they can only rely on internal funding. Since market imperfections have asymmetry information and agency costs, means to get external funding will increase higher costs than internal funding (Greenwald, et al. 1984). External capital is not a perfect substitute for internal capital. In line Business and Finance Journal, Volume 6, No. 2, October 2021 130 with this, Fazzari et al. (1988) show that com- pany investment depends on financial factors such as internal funding availability, access to capital markets, or funding costs. Companies with lively working capital require more fund- ing, so the optimal amount of working capital will be lower for companies with financial con- straints. When increasing the degree of inven- tory, financially constrained firms tend to rely on account payables because they will find difficulties to access external funding. That causes financially constrained firms cannot use a discount facility if they buy inventory in early payments from a supplier. On the one hand, a higher degree of account payable can reduce the working capital. That will be different for financially unconstrained firms. They can use discount facilities if buying supplies in cash to suppliers because they have sufficient cash. Even though it turns out that they do not have enough cash, they can easily access external funding, such as bank loans. The discounts provided by these suppliers will certainly be more significant than the bank interest in order to attract companies to do early payment finan- cially unconstrained firms are relatively more extensive and more mature. Companies with a greater internal funding capacity and higher access to capital markets tend to have higher working capital Hill et al. (2010). Based on the following explanation, this study composes the second hypothesis as follows. H2: Financially constrained firms will have a lower degree of optimal working capital than financially unconstrained firms. METHODOLOGY The sample in this study is non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Ex- change during the period 2010–2019. Sources of data in the study came from OSIRIS. This research is quantitative. Based on the hypoth- esis and research analysis model, the variables in this study consist of dependent variables, independent variables, company grouping vari- ables with financial constraints, and control variables. The dependent variable in this study is firm performance which is measured by ac- counting performance. Accounting performance is proxied by ROA and ROE. The independent variable in this paper is the working capital of the company. The net trade cycle is a proxy for measuring working capital. According to Banos-Caballero et al. (2013) and Shin and Soenen (1998), the net Measurement Proxy Dividend Pay-out Ratio If the firms have interest cover- age above the median then they are financially unconstrained firms, and vice versa. Dividend Pay-out Ratio: Dividend paid i,t / Net Income i,t Cash Flow If the firms have cash flow above the median then they are finan- cially unconstrained firms, and vice versa. Cash Flowi,t= (earning before interest taxesi,t+depreciationi,t ) /total asseti,t Interest coverage If the firms have interest cover- age above the median then they are financially unconstrained firms, and vice versa. Interest coveragei,t = EBITi,t / Interest expensesi,t Cost of external financing Companies that have a dividend pay-out ratio above the median are classified as companies with financial constraints. Conversely, if the company has a dividend pay-out ratio below the median, it is classified as a company with financial constraints. Cost of external financingi,t= financial expensesi,t / total debti,t Table 1 Variable Measurements trade cycle is a proxy for measuring working capital. The net trade cycle is measured by the following formula. Ninditya Nareswari, Nuraini Desty Nurmasari, Working Capital Management on Financially Constrained Firm 131 NTC i,t = (Account Receiveables i,t / Sales i,t )* 365 days + (Inventories i,t / Sales i,t ) *365 days – (Account payables i,t / Sales i,t )*365 day Furthermore, in this study the group of financially constrained firms or financially un- constrained firms based on dividends, cash flow, cost of external financing, and interest cover- age. The score is 1 for a financially constrained firm and 0 financially unconstrained firm. The estimates of the models are as follows: Hypothesis 1 Perfi,t= β0 + β1NTCi,t + β2NTC 2 i,t +β3SIZEi,t +εi,t (1) Hypothesis 2 Perfi,t=β0+β1NTCi,t+δ1DFCi,t*NTCi,t +β2NTC2i,t+δ2DFCi,t*NTC 2 i,t+β3SIZEi,t +εi,t Simplify the equation: Perfi,t=β0+(β1+δ1DFCi,t)NTCi,t + (β2+δ2DFCi,t)NTC 2 i,t+β3SIZEi,t+εi,t (2) Based equation (1), the optimal degree of working capital can be measured by determine the turning point obtained from: -�1/2�2 If there is maximum turning point form equation (1), then equation (2) can be esti- mated. The optimal degree of working capital can be measured by determine the turning point obtained from equation (2): -(�1+�1)/2(�2+�2) RESULT AND DISCUSSION The sample in this study was a non-finan- cial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2010–2019. Data were obtained from OSIRIS database. During sample selection, firms that have negative eq- uity and delisted were removed. Therefore, the final sample consisted of 435 firms. This work used a panel regression model to test the hy- pothesis. Using panel data allows us to mini- mize unobservable heterogeneity and eliminate the risk of obtaining biased (Greene, 2000). This work used a Hausman test to choose using a fixed-effect or random-effect model. Table 2 provides summary variables of this study. Hypothesis 1 Testing The results show a non-linear effect on company performance when using ROA and ROE as proxies for performance variables. That means that there is a non-linear effect of work- ing capital on company performance. The NTC coefficient is significantly positive, and the co- efficient of NTC2 has a significant negative value which means that the form of the effect is an u-shaped inverted curve that shows the maxi- mum point. In line with hypothesis 1 shows that the firm has an optimal degree of working capital. The optimal degree of working capital can be calculated using the maximum point formula (-�1/2�2). Table 2 Summary Statistics Mean Median Min Max Std. Dev NTC 93.2896 65.61 -778.08 1070.33 127.306 NTC2 24902.84 4748.5881 1.00E-04 1145606.3 67239.95 ROA 0.0362 0.03234 -0.6193 0.54333 0.080895 ROE 0.0586 0.07127 -13.835 5.173837 0.434555 Size 20.952 21.0269 15.1862 25.0191 1.6885 Lev 0.2688 0.25697 4.3E-03 537.563 0.18087 Growth 0.6305 0.09329 -0.8772 0.9386 12.0623 CF 0.1013 0.092544 -0.504 0.6943 0.08624 DPR 0.4140 0 0 0.8742 0.9384 Intcov 777.95 3,362 -1185,2 1000665 25631,45 Coexf 0.503 0.079 0 245.774 7.710 NTC: net trade cycle, ROA: return on asset, ROE: re- turn on equity, Size, Leverage, Growth, CF: cash flow, DPR: dividend pay-out ratio, Intcov: interest coverage, Coexf: cost of external financing. Hypothesis 2 Testing The results show that the NTC coefficient is significantly positive and the coefficient of NTC2 has a significant negative value which Business and Finance Journal, Volume 6, No. 2, October 2021 132 unconstrained firms. That obtained from -�1/ 2�2 dan -(�1�1)/2(�2+�2). The results sup- ported H2 that financially constrained firms will have a lower degree of optimal working capital than financially unconstrained firms. CONCLUSION The results show that working capital has a nonlinear effect (U-shaped inverted) on the performance when using ROA and ROE as performance measurement, which means there is a maximum point. The optimal degree of working capital for the ROA and ROE as per- formance is 271.23 days and 267.20 days, re- spectively. This study answers the contradic- tions of previous studies, which showed a posi- tive effect of working capital on firm perfor- Independent Variables Dependent Variables ROA ROE NTC .000198*** .0006894* NTC2 -3.65e-07*** -1.29e-06 * Size .0031396 -.0877535 Leverage -.082075** -.2765073 Growth .0002436*** -.0003085 R2 0.2095 0.005 means that the form of the effect is an u-shaped inverted curve that shows the maximum point. The results also show a significant interaction coefficient between DFC and NTC and on DFC and NTC2 on grouping financially con- strained firms based on size, cash flow, and dividend pay-out ratio. Both coefficients can be used to calculate working capital for financially constrained firms. So, the next step for hypoth- esis 2 testing is calculating the firm’s optimal working capital for financially constrained and Dependent Variable: ROA DPRdummy CFdummy Intcovdummy Coexfdummy NTC .0002254*** .0005925*** 0,000376*** 0,0001771** NTC2 -3.80e-07*** -8.44e-07*** -6,8e-07*** -3,62e-07** DFC*NTC -.0001118** -.0004255*** -0,00035*** -0,0000954** DFC* NTC2 1.74e-07** 5.15e-07** 5,33e-07*** 1,57e-07* Size .0029461 .0007259 0,017867** 0,018717** Leverage -.0955525*** -.0789955** -0,0745885** -0,085418** Growth .0002257*** .0002572** 0,00015777* 0,0003976** Constant -.0067677 0201579 -0,3209886** -0,33126** R2 0.2853 0.2749 0,2572 0,1525 Dependent Variable: ROE DPRdummy CFdummy Intcovdummy Coexfdummy NTC .0005848** .0016575** 0,0009426*** 0,0003778*** NTC2 -9.86e-07** -2.57e-06** -1,45e-06*** -7,02e-07*** DFC*NTC -.000275** -.0010391** -0,0006951*** -0,0003128*** DFC* NTC2 4.43e-07* 1.38e-06* 1,05e-06*** 5,70e-07** Size -.0925937 -.093267 0,0348592*** 0,0337162*** Leverage -.3056945 -.2701036** -0,1712547** -0,2627797*** Growth -.000522 -.0002748 0,0003015** 0,0005083* Constant 2.066393 2.023086 -0,6357135*** -0,8247029*** R2 0.0136 0.0318 0,1608 0,1186 Table 3 Hypothesis 1 Testing Table 4 Hypothesis 2 Testing Ninditya Nareswari, Nuraini Desty Nurmasari, Working Capital Management on Financially Constrained Firm 133 mance (Schiff and Lieber, 1974; Blinder and Maccini 1991; Charitou, Lois, and Santoso, 2012) and showed a negative effect of working capital on firm performance. (Kim and Chung, 1990; Mohamad and Saad, 2010; Kieschnick et al., 2011). Table 5 Summary of Hypothesis 1 Testing the manager must be able to decide the optimal degree of working capital in order to produce maximum financial performance. Besides, the optimal degree of working capital owned by each company will be different depending on several factors; one of them is the financial condition of the firm. Financially constrained firms will have a lower degree of optimal work- ing capital than unconstrained firms. So the manager must consider the financial condition in determining the degree of working capital in order to produce maximum financial perfor- mance. This study has the following limitations: 1. The study has not separated the sample of working capital so that the working capital range is still too broad 2. The study only relates the amount of optimal working capital to the financial condition yet to associate with other factors. 3. Grouping of financially constrained firms are only based on the median of the sample is not strong enough to provide that the com- pany is classified as a financially constrained or financially unconstrained firm. The group- ing is only separated the sample into two groups. Then further research can confirm the findings of whether a firm that has a low degree of working capital will increase its performance if working capital is extended and vice versa by the following research suggestions: 1. For further research, it can be used by separating the sample first based on the firm’s working capital. 2. For further research, the optimal degree of working capital can be related to other fac- tors such as the business life cycle or bar- gaining power. Dependent Variables Result ROA 271,23 days ROE 267,20 days Table 6 Summary of Hypothesis 2 Testing Besides, the results also show that there is an interaction impact between the financial constraints dummy and working capital when using financially constrained firms grouped based on cash flow, size, and dividend pay-out ratio using ROA and ROE as performance. The next step is calculating the optimal degree of work- ing capital for financially constrained and un- constrained firms. The results show that finan- cially constrained firms have lower optimal working capital than financially unconstrained firms. This shows that the benefits of working capital are more used by financially uncon- strained firms. This study has implications for manage- ment to consider the optimal degree of working capital. First, working capital can have a posi- tive impact on firms performance, but when a firm has working capital that exceeds the opti- mal degree, it will harm firm performance. So Dependent Variable: ROA DPRdummy CFdummy Intcovdummy Coexfdummy NFC 296.57 days. 351 days 166.66 days 195.45 days FC 275.72 days 253,21 days 309.21 days 244.61 days Dependent Variable: ROE DPRdummy CFdummy Intcovdummy Coexfdummy NFC 296.551 days 322.47 days 309.375 days 246.21 days FC 285,26 days 259.83 days 325.03 days 269.08 days Business and Finance Journal, Volume 6, No. 2, October 2021 134 3. For further research can be used other prox- ies, especially grouping companies financially constrained firms more comprehensive, for example using specific scores. REFRENCES Baños-Caballero S, P. J. García-Teruel, & P. Martínez-Solano. (2013). Working capital management, corporate performance, and financial constraints. Journal of Business Research, 67 (3), 332–338. Blinder, A. S. & Maccini, L. J. (1991). The resur- gence of inventory research: What have we learned? Journal of Economic Surveys, 5, 291–328 Brigham, E. & Ehrhardt, M. (2014). Financial Management: Theory and Practice, 14th ed., pp. 370–371. Ohio: South-Western Publishing. Charitou, M., Lois, P., & Santoso, H.B. (2012). The Relationship between Working Capi- tal Management and Firm’s Profitability: An Empirical Investigation for an Emerging Asian Country”. The International Business & Economics Research Journal, 11(8), 839. Deloof, M. (2003). Does working capital man- agement affect profitability of Belgian firms? Journal of Business Finance & Ac- counting, 30, 573–587. Emery, G. (1984). A purefinancial explanation for trade credit. Journal of Financial and Quan- titative Analysis, 19, 271–285. Fazzari, Steven M., et al. (1988). Financing Con- straints and Corporate Investment. Brook- ings Paper on Economic Activity, 1, 141– 195. Greenwald, B., Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1984). Informational imperfections in the capital market and macroeconomic fluctuations. American Economic Review, 74, 194–199. Hanafi, Mamduh M. (2016). Manajemen Keu- angan, Edisi kedua, Cetakan pertama. Yog- yakarta: BPFE. Hill, M. D., Kelly, G., & Highfield, M. J. (2010). Net operating working capital behaviour: a first look. Financial Management, 39, 783–805. Kaplan, Steven N. and Zingales, Luigi. (1997). Do Financing Constraints Explain Why Investment is Correlated with Cash Flow? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112: pp. 169–215. Kim, Y. H., & Chung, K. H. (1990). An integrated evaluation of investment in inventory and credit: a cash flow approach. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 17, 381– 390. Kieschnick, R., LaPlante, M., & Moussawi, R. (2011). Working capital management and shareholder wealth. Working paper (SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract = 1431165). Mohamad, Nor Edi & Saad, Noriza Binti. (2010). Working Capital Management: The Effect of Market Valuation and Profitability in Malaysia. International Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5, No 11, November 2010. Neely, Andy. (2004). Business Performance Mea- surement: Theory and Practice. Interna- tional Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press. Schiff, M. & Lieber, Z. (1974). A model for the integration of credit and inventory manage- ment. Journal of Finance, 29, 133–140. Shin, H. H. & Soenen, L. (1998). Efficiency of working capital and corporate profitabil- ity. Financial Practice & Education, 8, 37– 45.