Business Management Research and Applications: A Cross Disciplinary Journal 1 Educating Black Males: A Jamaican Case - Issues, Lessons, and Trajectory Asburn Pinnock, Ed D | The Mico University College, Kingston, Jamaica Franklyn Bennett, M. Ed | The Mico University College, Kingston, Jamaica Contact: asburn.pinnock@themico.edu.jm or franklyn.bennett@themico.edu.jm or franklyngbennett@gmail.com Abstract The underperformance of black Caribbean males has been a long-standing phenomenon affecting the educational outcomes of men within the lower strata of society. Experimenting or second-chance programs have been implemented to address this issue, but there is limited evidence of their impact. This paper presents the case of the Pre-University Men’s Program (PUMP) at a teacher education institution in Kingston, Jamaica, from 2008 to 2020. It was investigated semi-qualitatively, incorporating focus group conversations, reflective narratives, interviews, and documentary analysis to collect the pertinent data from the men, service providers (facilitators and administrators), stakeholders, program documents, and students’ records. This investigation determines PUMP’s effectiveness in realizing the program objectives and adherence to second chance program standards, an administrative structure, and a support system. The findings revealed that PUMP has all the defining characteristics for second chance programs posited in literature; an acknowledgment of the socio-economic benefits to the men who participated in the programs is undeniable; and an opportunity to recruit male teachers to impact boys at an early age and keep them focused on a tertiary educational track is provided. PUMP is implemented through a functional administrative structure operated by the teacher education institution, but a not well-defined support system has undermined follow-up services for its participants. It is recommended that collaboration with other institutions and stakeholders to enhance student recruitment, funding, program diversity, administration, and support would secure program survival. Keywords: underperformance, second chance program, support system, effectiveness, standards mailto:asburn.pinnock@themico.edu.jm mailto:franklyn.bennett@themico.edu.jm mailto:franklyngbennett@gmail.com January 2025 | Volume 4, Number 2 2 Introduction The issue of the underperformance of black Caribbean males is an established problem with some consensus on the complex, interrelated root causes for lower-strata men's declining participation and performance in the educational system. The literature places significant emphasis on boys’ achievement relative to girls’ (Jha et al., 2017; Vantieghem et al, 2014; Clarke, 2005; Goldberg & Bruno, 1999; Chevannes, 2002; Parry, 1997). However, there is limited evidence of experimentation on programs designed to combat the issues specific to marginalized males (Johnson, 2016). Gender imbalance can be counterproductive in any society. Our reality, as reflected in the Gender Imbalance Cycle diagram (see Figure 1), is that there are low numbers of males graduating from high schools, even fewer matriculating to teachers’ colleges, and few being trained as teachers. This results in fewer male teachers graduating, thus fewer teacher role models for black boys in schools. The decreasing number of male teachers in the Jamaican classroom is creating social problems among boys. Figure 1: GENDER IMBALANCE CYCLE IN TEACHER EDUCATION (Pinnock, 2021) The Jamaican experience relative to boys or men reflects the global reality. According to a United Nations Report (2015) on worldwide gender distribution in education, it is quite clear that women far outnumbered men in the practice of education in all but one level of education. Sixty- seven percent of the teachers at the primary level are females; 52 % of secondary education teachers are women, but 58 % of teachers at the tertiary level are men. Bouchrika (2020) informed that a 2019 UNICEF Report indicated that at the primary level, 5.5 million more girls are out of school than boys, and more girls than boys are completing secondary education. At the post- secondary level, 56.6 % of the enrolled student population in tertiary institutions are females. Low numbers of ms graduating from high schools Fewer males matriculating to teachers’ colleges Few males being trained as teachers Less male teachers graduating Less male teacher role models for black boys in schools Less graduating males from high school Business Management Research and Applications: A Cross Disciplinary Journal 3 Outlined below is the co-relationship between male/female and African American males/other races, presented from the American perspective: According to an article written by Amy L. Solomon and published by the National Institute of Justice, an estimated 13 million people in the U.S. are admitted to and released from local jails. And more than 700,000 people are admitted to and released from state and local prisons each year, with men accounting for more than three-fourths of those arrested. The numbers are even more staggering for African Americans, who comprise almost 40 percent of the entire prison population. But even more troubling is the fact that, on any given day, one in 15 black men are in prison. And among young African American men—those ages 20 through 34—the ratio lowers further to one in nine. "In fact, young, male African American high-school dropouts have higher odds of being in jail than being employed," Solomon reports. These shameful statistics suggest that creating channels of re-entry are imperative (Weathersby,2015, p3). Comparing the above with the Jamaican experience, in a STATIN report (2019), of the 1,272 prison inmates admitted at the central prison in the capital city in 2018, 96.1 % were males. In 2018, the U.N. Survey on World Prison Population reported 3,884 prison inmates, of which 96.7% were males. Gayle (2002), in his research on young males’ survivability, found that one-fifth of the perpetrators of crime and violence are males 20 years and younger. These data provide emerging insights into what factors account for the males who do not make it to college and or are qualified for a job. The data highlight Jamaica’s sad reality that there are more males in prisons. Inferences are likely to be drawn, too, that there are more males in the cemeteries, more males on the streets, and more males unemployed. There are perceptions among well-thinking Jamaicans that these men are preoccupied with gender thinking, i.e., having the thought that males are getting by or beating the system. Therefore, education beyond the primary level or lower secondary level does not seem attractive to them. Many jurisdictions employ corrective measures, often called Second Chance Programs, to address this issue. Second chance programs are used worldwide to support disadvantaged or marginalized youth. Inherent in these programs are socio-economic benefits. Not only will they redirect socially misaligned young men from deviant behavior, but the second chance programs will also recreate gender equilibrium by returning males to the education landscape, especially at the tertiary level. This will also impact the economy positively as it will reduce the dependency of these men on the state resources while putting them in a position to add to its economic growth. In the case of PUMP at a teacher education institution, the program adds other benefits, including the induction of males into the teaching profession and the provision of other productive alternative pathways, hence helping to break the cycle of black male delinquency. Literature Review Second chance programs have given the disadvantaged or marginalized alternatives and hope. In 1992 and 1993, Mark McFadden conducted an ethnographic inquiry into the effects of a bridging program aimed at homeless and educational deprived youth in Sydney, Australia. It implemented a program of pedagogic strategy for change and relied on Bernstein’s concept of classification and framing and Gidden’s theory of structuration in interpreting the research. McFadden (1996) found both concepts helpful in highlighting how different groups could navigate their way through what he referred to as the bridging program. Participants were now in a position where they matriculated and were offered positions in tertiary institutions; some still had an uncertain future, while others remained the way they came. Another second chance program was conducted in Mexico in 1995, where Ron Hubbard used a second chance program to detoxicate and rehabilitate substance abusers. Related literature on the design and structure of second chance programs suggests that programs that serve as educational bridges are more effective when they address the pedagogical experience of the participants (McFadden, 1996). McFadden opined that the previously failed strategies would fail again because they would no doubt remind the participants of their disappointing and sometimes painful past. Adding to the advice on program design and structure, European Centre for the Development of http://www.nij.gov/journals/270/pages/criminal-records.aspx#noteReference29 http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/pjim06.pdf http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/pjim06.pdf January 2025 | Volume 4, Number 2 4 Vocational Training (2021) posits that the characteristics of a second chance program include deliberate interaction of young people through community support; a creative alternative to mainstream education through an environment that engenders friendliness and mutual respect; development of the whole person through the engagement of a multi-professional team or staff; diagnostic assessment of the learners for individualized instruction and related engagements; relevant connection with the formal education sector, in that outcomes from the second chance program should be useful in the formal sector (employment and higher education); provision of flexibility in practice in dealing with registration, attendance, instruction, assessment and sanction; promotion of positive attitudes through stakeholder awareness of the benefits of second chance program; utilizing eclectic teaching and learning methods through integration of andragogy, coaching, competency based education and training (CBET), practical and field work; and the inclusion of motivational activities through formal and informal means. Savelsberg et al. (2017) concur with these program components but emphasize the importance of relationship building, mentoring, and the persistent presence of service providers securing coverage (protection) for the participants. The desired outcomes of second-chance programs suggest that second-chance measures allow participants to gain a formal qualification that eluded them in mainstream school. Besides academic accomplishments, second chance programs can enhance participants’ soft outcomes and skills such as self-awareness, self-planning for the future, and emotional intelligence. These skills can position participants for gainful employment or further education if developed or enhanced. Second-chance opportunities can also result in positive outcomes for at-risk youth facing complex barriers to learning, such as substance abuse, housing or health issues, the lack of parental support, and involvement in crime (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, 2021). Limitations and challenges of second chance programs restrict the full extent to which set targets are realized. McFadden’s ethnographic research (1996) noted that some students were successful while others dropped out or remained disadvantaged. The real key to this is to find out the factors that enabled success in a second chance program and how those may be harnessed to design a program to ensure success. It was noted that pedagogy that participants could not relate to saw them revert to old practices, which undermined changed behaviors (McFadden,1996). Lindguist et al. (2015), in evaluating a second-chance program for adult offenders, found other challenges that undermined the program's effectiveness. Some of these challenges include delays in buy-in from policymakers, frequent staff turnover, and limited record-keeping. In their research, Savelsberg et al. (2017) concurred with the observation of Lindguist et al. (2015) regarding the inconsistent goodwill and investment by service providers or staff. They provided other challenges to the second chance program implemented, such as limited funding, especially in follow-up areas after the program was completed. That quick fix instead of an incremental approach did not address participants’ long-term needs. The literature concludes that a proper support system in a non-threatening environment should help in the program’s success. Methods This investigation evaluates the Pre-University Men’s Program (PUMP) at a teacher education institution in Kingston, Jamaica, from 2008 to 2020 to determine its effectiveness in realizing the program objectives, adherence to second chance program standards, and administrative structure and support system. The evaluation was carried out at the teacher education section of the institution that operates continuing education programs. It is a public entity with over 170 years of service to the Western Hemisphere. PUMP was evaluated through a quasi-qualitative means, which incorporated focus group conversations, reflective narratives, semi-structured interviews, and documentary analysis to purposively collect the pertinent data from the men (20 graduates), service providers (10 facilitators and five administrators), four stakeholders, PUMP document or curriculum and students’ records for the period 2008 to 2020. Each of the program’s objectives guided the Business Management Research and Applications: A Cross Disciplinary Journal 5 thematic analysis and presentation of the data. The literature supports such a research design to facilitate quasi-qualitative data analysis (Knodel & Saengtienchai, 1999; Barron & Tracey, 2018). Semi-structured interviews and focus group conversations were held separately with the men, service providers, and other stakeholders of PUMP. These participants interacted with the program from 2008 to 2020. The interviews and conversations aimed to unearth their experiences and solicit feedback on the program's impact. Participants were also allowed to share their reflective thoughts electronically. Available students’ records (admission, attendance, performance, and behavior) and PUMP Documents or Curricula were accessed with permission. The semi-structured interview schedule, focus group conversation guide, instruction guide for reflective thoughts, and checklists for document analysis were validated through vetting done by colleagues and then updated based on the feedback. Data from students’ records, the PUMP Document, reflective thoughts, semi-interviews, and focus group conversations were used for inductive and deductive content analysis. Pre-determined themes also guided the analysis. The quasi-qualitative analysis proved useful in evaluating and forming conclusions on PUMP's effectiveness. All participants were informed about the study's purpose and obtained consent before participation. Anonymity and confidentiality using pseudonyms were maintained throughout the research process to ensure that participants felt comfortable sharing their honest opinions and insights. The Intervention As one of its kind at the national tertiary education level, the Pre-University Men’s Program (PUMP) was established in part as a response to Gayle's (2002) research on young males’ survivability. It signaled that one-fifth of the perpetrators of crime and violence are males twenty (20) years and younger and established the link between a lack of adequate, equitable, and targeted investments in education and its relationship to crime and violence (Gayle, 2021, Presentation on Underrepresentation of Males in Higher Education Institutions). It is not coincidental that Gayle (2021) revealed that being an uneducated male in Jamaica is the main requirement for gang recruitment. His findings revealed that a Jamaican male batters his woman more than 50% of the national average of Latin American and Caribbean countries. A survey conducted with boys from Montego Bay, Spanish Town, and Kingston, Jamaica, revealed that boys who sat three subjects in CSEC were four times less likely to be harmed by gun or knife violence or be involved in a gang (Gayle, 2021). Therefore, PUMP, as a second chance initiative, has been implemented in Jamaica with these objectives: 1. Increase the number of men accessing tertiary education. 2. Increase the number of male teachers in the classroom. 3. Provide an alternate pathway to crime and violence. PUMP is a one-year matriculating program into a four-year bachelor’s degree in education. It simultaneously inducts the men into the teaching profession. PUMP develops competencies in literacy, numeracy, communication, information technology, and technical vocations to the CSEC level. It provides advanced-level engagement in psychology, resource management, and spiritual and moral studies. Opportunities are also provided in mentoring, study skills, social interactions, entrepreneurship, employability skills, and personal and civic awareness or pride. PUMP is scheduled as a full-time day (2 semesters) and a part-time evening (3 semesters) program. It weighs thirty to thirty-six credits based on the time-of-day participants access the program. The men are integrated into the entire life of the university college. This integration gives the men access to sports, clubs and societies, inter-house and collegiate competitions, residential accommodation, and participation in all events of the university college. This immersion is designed to give them a real identity as an emerging ‘Model Man’- an outstanding teacher and leader in the community. Structurally, PUMP embraces compatible philosophical, psychological, and sociological principles. These principles govern curriculum development, which are in tandem with second chance programs. In the main, an ad hoc approach (Williams, 2013) was used by a team of educators who were growing in reflective and reflexive practice as a strategy to respond to immediate societal demands. PUMP January 2025 | Volume 4, Number 2 6 incorporates a holistic focus and an interdisciplinary approach, thus catering to the needs of the whole person or man (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, 2021). The disciplines included were Language, Science, Mathematics, Humanities, Vocation, Sports, and Arts (see Table 1). Table 1 PUMP Structure Semester 1 Credit Semester 2 Credit CSEC English Language / City & Guilds English Skills CSEC English Language / City & Guilds English Skills 3 CSEC Mathematics / City & Guilds Mathematics CSEC Mathematics / City & Guilds Mathematics 3 Research & Information Technology Research & Information Technology 3 Introduction to Teaching Profession 3 Resource Management 3 Mentorship Mentorship 3 Human Development (Advanced Level) 3 Spiritual & Moral Development or Any Other (Advanced Level)) 3 Career & Personal Development 0 TVET (Skill Area) 3 Entrepreneurship 3 Voice & Speech 3 TVET (Skill Area) 3 Sports & The Arts 0 12 24 Progressivism as an educational philosophy and constructivism as an educational theory underpinned how courses were designed, developed, and implemented. This provided the facilitation for reflectivity and student-centredness, which should give a voice to learners (Schneider, 1996). This teaching methodology incorporated sacred texts (Erickson, 2002) for rehabilitation. From a sociological perspective (functionalist), building social cohesion through civic pride and promoting values, attitudes, ethics of care, and justice were incorporated into the program as a practice for participants and the service providers or staff. Savelsberg et al. (2017) endorsed such inclusion since it engenders respect, protection, trust, and realness when interacting with the men in the program. Also, in terms of providing mentors for the men in the program, careful attention was given to select model male alumni and maternal females who practiced pastoral care. Sponsorship was solicited from the corporate sector, alumni, and government sources. In the initial years of PUMP, sponsorship was solicited by some Members of Parliament. According to McFadden (1996) and Savelsberg et al. (2017), funding is necessary for second chance programs to survive. Other features built into the program were flexibility which provided laxity in movements within reason; diagnostic assessment used as a frame of reference for actions; motivational activities to spark internal and external drive for success; and relational engagements for building and maintaining healthy human relationships with each other (see European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training; 2021, Savelsberg, et, al.,2017; Lindguist et al., 2015; McFadden, 1996). Business Management Research and Applications: A Cross Disciplinary Journal 7 Findings & Discussion: Other Lessons Learned PUMP’s effectiveness was qualitatively measured in terms of the extent to which its objectives regarding the scope and quality of impact on the men who participated in the program were realized for the review period. Its adherence to second chance program standards, administrative structure, and support system was also included. The related findings are shared under categorized themes aligned with PUMP's objectives and discussed accordingly in the context of the relevant literature on recommendations for successful second- chance programs explored. Motivators that propelled the participants towards academic pursuits vis-a-vis their counterparts or contemporaries Based on data gleaned at student selection interviews (admission records) and students’ reflections, the men were attracted to PUMP because it gave them another opportunity to access education, and more so at the tertiary level, the possibility of getting financial assistance, an escape route from the negative influences of their community, and the chance to be recognized as 'M students’ and eventually teachers. The following are reflections from some students who pursued the program: Mikmac: “My PUMP journey was one filled with substance; it helped to prepare me for my journey in the degree program”. Osh: “It is a great start for young men who have the zeal to keep fighting”. Mrk: “I was struggling with self-esteem issues for a period in my life and when the teacher education institution accepted someone like me, who society looks down on, I was elated. When others who are disabled see me, they will be encouraged to continue and go forward.” For these recruits, PUMP is seen as an empowering mechanism for those on the margins of society. Table 2 summarizes the profile of the men enrolled in PUMP. It was instructive that ‘men at risk’ or the marginalized males, as coined by Miller (1991) and as seen by the Caribbean Policy Research Institute-CAPRI (2020), are in the below 35 years age group. In contrast, Children First’s Claudette Richardson-Pious (2020), in a presentation on ‘At Risk Youth Issues and Challenges in Jamaica,’ pointed out that empirical evidence revealed that ‘unattached youth’ accounted for 30% of the youth population and these youth are from 10 to 24 years old; of which 26.2% are males. These vulnerable men, according to these researchers, are illiterate, undereducated, unemployed, not participating in any training program, murder victims, and primary perpetrators of crime (CAPRI, 2020; Richardson-Pious, 2020). These realities reinforced similar findings the Office of the Children Advocate (2011), and Levy (2012) shared with the Jamaican public that youth, mainly men (70.9%) in the age groups 12 to 18 years and 17 to 45 years respectively, are delinquents. Table 2 Profile of Men Enrolled in PUMP:2008 - 2020 Age Range Education At-Risk Community 10 - 14 years None None None 15 – 19 years Dropped out of upper secondary; completed secondary with 2-3 CSEC subject passes Involved in, and being influenced by others in unlawful activities Urban; urban inner- city; rural January 2025 | Volume 4, Number 2 8 20 – 24 years Dropped out of upper secondary; completed secondary with 2-3 CSEC subject passes; attended evening classes and obtained 2 – 3 CSEC subject passes Involved in, and being influenced by others in unlawful activities; seasonal or odd/menial employment Urban; urban inner- city; rural 25 – 29 years completed secondary with 2-3 CSEC subject passes; attended evening classes and obtained 2 – 3 CSEC subject passes Seasonal or odd/menial employment; child support demands; being influenced by others in unlawful activities; ex-inmate Urban; urban inner- city; rural Menial From the program's onset, the men could identify with PUMP based on what was advertised for recruitment and information gleaned during their admission processing. They started feeling accepted. This realization of the convergence of students’ needs and the focus of the program is consistent with the typical participants’ profile for second chance programs advanced by the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2021); Savelsberg et al., (2017); Lindguist et al., (2015) and McFadden, (1996). Intrinsic and extrinsic sources of motivation were active through the men’s desire for self and professional improvement and encouragement from participants, past teachers or school administrators, church members, family members, politicians, community members, corporate sponsors, and past PUMP students. Other stakeholders’ endorsements of PUMP as a rehabilitating endeavor were summarized in the following excerpts: SH: “…an incubator for our male youth…it counteracts absenteeism of fathers and low percentage of males in the classroom…” Rev: “…has taken the men out of the rough and shaped them into value…” TP:” A highlight of this program is the men’s enthusiasm, evident through the questions they ask…” Dr: …” critical and useful program to facilitate young men who could be considered late starters….” The men's shared experiences affirmed that PUMP strongly appealed to their needs, especially allowing them to gain a formal qualification and be again connected to the formal education system. Other stakeholders of PUMP were convinced that the program was directing the men away from the socioeconomic barriers that restricted their personal and professional pursuits before their enrolment in PUMP. This reality is fully aligned with the desired outcomes advanced by Savelsberg et al. (2017) and supported by the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2021). Ways in which program structure and teaching methodologies facilitated educational attainment. A consensus among participants and the service providers (staff) is that PUMP, as a one-year matriculating program, prepared males to qualify for entry into a bachelor’s degree in education (teaching) program of their choice. Between 2008 and 2020, approximately 200 men were enrolled in PUMP, and over 150 have been empowered in many ways. The program’s 75% success rate suggests that many men have developed the competencies facilitated through the courses. This outcome supports McFadden’s (1996) experience that a bridging program should provide success to persons previously considered failures in mainstream education. From the analysis, more than 135 Business Management Research and Applications: A Cross Disciplinary Journal 9 matriculated to undergraduate programs at MUC and have done well. One of these transformed men, Mikmac, became President of the Guild of Students in 2014. He shared: “PUMP prepared me for life. This preparation enabled me to serve in the most senior level of student governance. In my second year of study, I served as Assistant Students’ Relations Officer, Students’ Relations Officer in my third year and President of the Guild of Students in my final year. Serving in these positions gave me valuable, life changing experiences. I could not have bought the gains I have garnered from my experiences…,all of this came through PUMP”. The following thoughts from one of the program administrators captured the real educational impact of PUMP: Den: “Its inaugural years admitted 25 men, of which 21 matriculated into B Ed programs. Subsequent years witnessed men who came in on a five-year track graduating with honours…” The data revealed that to orient the men into teaching; engaging opportunities were provided in mentoring, study skills, social interactions, and personal and civic awareness or pride. Both the service providers (staff) and students admitted that employability skills were integrated throughout the program. The teaching methodologies included practical, hands-on, and student-friendly activities encouraging authentic and alternative learning assessment. These program characteristics are consistent with McFadden’s (1996) notion that the pedagogy used in a second-chance education should not allow participants to revert to old practices, which undermine changed behaviors. According to the men who participated in PUMP, the program was scheduled to facilitate the full- time day and part-time evening students. This is an occurrence of the flexibility built into PUMP, adherent to the criteria outlined by the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2021) and Savelsberg et al. (2017), in that a second chance program should offer flexible provision. None of these men pursued the program in the evening because they were unemployed. Although one of them was employed, he was accommodated to retain his status as a day student, as explained here: While Rom was a full-time day student, he was employed, but the program’s flexibility accommodated his working schedule. His employers were so impressed with his overall performance in the program and on the job that he was promoted. Rom expressed “…the great thing about the degree that I’m doing from this institution is that I am not limited to teaching in a classroom. I can enter the institution and still use my voice to try to empower others who come from situations like mine, to make something of themselves...” In general, the men accepted that as day students, they were integrated fully into the institution's life as a strategic means to give them a real identity as an emerging ‘Model Man’. This integration allowed them to deport themselves as a typical student and access to sports, clubs/societies, inter-house and collegiate competitions, residential accommodation, and participation in all institution events. To be placed in an environment where participants experience non-discrimination but confidence building and comfort is a high global recommendation for the provision of second-chance education (see European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, 2021; Savelsberg et al., 2017; Lindguist et al., 2015; McFadden, 1996). The following are recollections from the participants regarding PUMP: KE: … “Although we integrate with the wider college…this is on a social level…. the other students behaved in a way for you to know there is a difference in qualification…. anyway, they help you with your work…” Ric: “We are shown love and are called sons by Ms Bec who not afraid to open her eyes on us if we not behaving right. If she found out we are in need of anything, she secretly gave it to us. She and Ms J provided breakfast for us too. Ms J keeps us professional with PD…They and others even prayed with us…and inspired us with bible verses...” January 2025 | Volume 4, Number 2 10 Rom:” I finished my PUMP year as a top student and got an award. I got a scholarship in my first year in the degree program. Although I withdrew from the program because of migration, PUMP made the difference in my life for any other career path I choose….” One of the service providers cautioned that “although the program is fulfilling, it is challenged by inconsistent adherence to set standards. However, attention is given to learning and mentorship”. This reality check is consistent with the inherent barriers of second chance programs, which should be addressed deliberately. The tips given by the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2021) and other advocates (Savelsberg et al., 2017; Lindguist et al., 2015) to develop a second chance program indicate the inclusion of well-tailored strategies to meet participants’ needs. If not established, such efforts will not realize many benefits as workable links with internal and external systems for support, such as referral and other interconnected services, would not be accessible to the participants. This creates a gap in the balance of service in a fulsome sense. Program experience influenced alternative pathways and classroom male teacher presence Over the twelve years of the more than 135 men who matriculated to undergraduate teaching programs, 76 graduated as trained teachers, increasing the male teacher presence in Jamaican classrooms. During their undergraduate years, several men got involved in leadership engagements and ably served as House Captains. Many were (and are still) active in sports and music and represented the teacher education institution well in Sports and Music Competitions. A proud moment occurred in 2011 when NB, a cricketer, was recruited for the West Indies Cricket Team. Also, MS, another cricketer, was selected to play for the national cricket team for the visually challenged. Again, these transformed men became role models to others of similar backgrounds. Empowered PUMP men are now trained coaches, primary school teachers, and teachers of Physical Education, Music, Social Studies, and Business Studies in high schools. Some PUMP graduates are trained guidance counselors in schools. Those who did not move into teacher education programs or other programs of study elsewhere were channeled into employment opportunities and other gainful activities. One of them secured an overseas sports scholarship. PUMP graduates shared how the program added value to their lives: Chr: “The program is so developed that it caters to the holistic development of the human being. Courses such as Mentorship and Personal Development taught me how to be confident, focused and to prepare my mind to set goals and work towards achieving them. Can you believe it...I am a trained teacher and in a school working and taking care of my family…”? New Me: … “I remember the awards function we dressed formally for...It was first for me to wear a suit and eat with knife and fork and do the other things...they guided us well…Mr S, Sir B..and Ms DW…. thanks…” Osh: “It is a great start for young men who have the zeal to keep fighting; take my word, you will love your time spent there once you apply yourself. I now know ‘I am a forceful energy; I can’t be stopped. Live life above elevation’…” Evidently, PUMP mentored, engendered survival and problem-solving skills in, and built brotherhood among the men. They experienced kindness, empathy, and reciprocity. Their experiences, although diverse, would be cherished. The processes involved were not always welcomed, but they had to endure with a good amount of fun. The renewal these men experienced validates McFadden’s (1996) idea that change will happen in a supportive environment. The fact that these men’s economic well-being, among other things, improved is a strong indication that the list of individual benefits for participants in a second chance program advanced by the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2021) is useful to guide program development and implementation. The PUMP experience is consistent with these benefits or desired outcomes. Business Management Research and Applications: A Cross Disciplinary Journal 11 Barriers experienced and hurdled Despite the expressed positives of PUMP, the dropouts, shortfall in student enrolment (reduced from 25 students to under 15), limited funding, and gaps in family support have been active threats to the program's survival. These realities are consistent with barriers experienced in second-chance programs described by Savelsberg et al. (2017). Critical stakeholders of the program have been concerned and, through their expressed thoughts, shared the following: Dev: “...An excellent program as seen in the men’s desire to learn. Some of them were unable to complete the program and this affected their ability to go onto higher learning. Funding is a challenge, therefore sponsorship is needed…” RK: “...These men have grown in discipline despite pockets of disciplinary challenge...” Sek: “...Attendance is challenged due to the financial state of these men...” A minority of the men who did not complete the program or were unsuccessful in their completion admitted that: Preacher: “… I am called to preach…. the activities involved cause me not to give the time for my studies…. I was in demand...so I had to stop…I thought I could cope...but I was far behind in my work so I couldn’t continue...” Inmate: “…. teaching is not for me because I still struggle to manage my anger. Letting you know I was an inmate…, not easy to share and …. you didn’t use it against me. I did not continue to the degree… I find a work….” Disappointed: “... Because I did not sit the Math exams you paid for is used against me to move into the degree program…. I still could get a chance and do the exam next time…” The admitted reasons for being unsuccessful in the program were in the locus of control of these men. This realization means more individualized counseling opportunities are needed to resolve personal struggles and career pursuits. This individualized provision is a necessary feature advanced by the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2021) to be present in second-chance interventions. Other barriers encountered, as gleaned from the data analyzed, were administrative. Students’ records were in place, but follow-up records relative to students’ progression were inconsistently kept or not in place. As cautioned by Savelsberg et al. (2017), this gap of limited record-keeping resulted in many instances in which approximations were used to report the men’s experiences after they completed their PUMP year and graduated as trained teachers. The analysis of the data shows that implemented initiatives or strategies to mitigate the challenges experienced during the period under review included fundraising through an annual 5K Run/Walk called ‘PUMP It UP’; internal subsidies where possible, a student work program; and sponsorship from targeted Members of Parliament and corporate interests. All advocates of second chance programs agreed that limited funding undermines the full effectiveness of any such program implemented (see European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, 2021: Savelsberg et al., 2017; Lindguist et al., 2015; McFadden, 1996). Conclusion: Trajectory PUMP has reflected all the defining characteristics of second chance programs posited in literature, and an acknowledgment of the socioeconomic benefits to the men who participated in the programs is undeniable. It will redirect socially misaligned young men from deviant behaviors and recreate gender equilibrium by returning males to the tertiary landscape and increasing male teacher presence in the classrooms. This will also impact the economy positively as it will reduce the dependency of these men on January 2025 | Volume 4, Number 2 12 state resources while putting them in a position to contribute to the country’s economic growth. In the case of PUMP, it even goes further and provides an opportunity to recruit male teachers to impact boys at an early age and keep them focused on a tertiary educational track and or some other productive alternative pathways, hence helping to break the cycle of black male delinquency. PUMP is implemented through a functional administrative structure operated by the institution, but a not well-defined support system has undermined follow-up services for its participants. In using the successes of PUMP as a platform to move forward, the following is recommended: 1. Consider a multi-agency national student recruitment drive to increase young men's college intake significantly. 2. Solicit consistent funding and referral support through multi-ministry government and non-government alliances. 3. Collaborate with other colleges and educational institutions to offer the PUMP program and significantly increase male classroom presence. 4. Diversify PUMP to appeal to men not inclined to become teachers. The program could include opportunities for other valuable courses of study and entrepreneurial skills to serve the public and private sectors. 5. Strengthen the program's administrative support and undertake a longitudinal study of every cohort of men enrolled in PUMP and beyond so that the program's real impact can be properly ascertained. References Admans, R., (2019) The Guardian, 5th September 2019 edition. Gaps in Academic Skills of Girls and boys widen. https://www.the guardian.com Barron, I. & Tracey, J. (2018). Quasi-Qualitative Evaluation of Progressive Counting in Secure Accommodation in Scotland: An Exploratory cluster case study, Journal of Cild & Adolescent Trauma, 11(3): 305-315 Bouchrika, I. (2020). 55 Education Statistics: Global Latest Trends & Predictions. Research. https://www.guide2research.com Caribbean Policy Research Institute-CAPRI (2020). Gun Out: The Splintering of Jamaica’s Gangs. http://ow.ly/eusN5OCGZ/l Chevannes, B (2002). What you sow Is What you reap: Violence and Construction of Male Identity in Jamaica. Current Issues in Comparative Education 2 (1) https?www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/pdf/25651_2_1_Chevannes.pdf&vedv- AKHSp4CCcQFjACegQIBRC&usg=AOvVaw19ANeOcz-xEfBgy0qITjaT Edelenbosch, R.; Kupper. F; Krabbendem, L; Broerse (2015). Brain-Based Learning and Educational Neuroscience: Boundry Work. Mind, Brain and Education. 9(1) 40-49 Edutopia Staff (2013). Multiple Intelligences: What Does the Research Say? Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/multiple-intelligences-research Erickson, V. (2002). Social Theory, Sacred Text and Sing-Sing Prison A Sociology of Community-Based Reconciliation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35(3-4) 225-241. https://www.tandfonline.com European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2021). Second chance measures. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/toolkits/vet-toolkit-tackling-early-leaving/intervention- approaches/second-chancemeasures Gayle, H. (2002). Adolescent Male Survivability in Jamaica. The Jamaica Adolescent Reproductive Health Project (Youth.now). Kgn Ja Gayle, H. & Bryan, P. (2019). Males and Tertiary Education in Jamaica. University Press of the West Indies, Mona, Ja Gayle, H. (2021). Presentation on Underrepresentation of Males in Higher Education Institutions. Webinar on Black Boys Education: Currency, Practices and Social Interventions in Jamaica held on March 19, 2021 https://www.the/ https://www.tandfonline.com/ https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/toolkits/vet-toolkit-tackling-early-leaving/intervention-approaches/second-chancemeasures https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/toolkits/vet-toolkit-tackling-early-leaving/intervention-approaches/second-chancemeasures Business Management Research and Applications: A Cross Disciplinary Journal 13 Giuliano, P. (2020). Gender and Culture (Discussion Paper). IZA-Institute of Labour Economics. https://www.ftp.iza.org Goldberg, N. and Bruno, R. (1999) Male Underachievement in Dominica: Extent, Causes and Solutions. Final Report. Roseau, Dominica: Basic Education Reform Project, Ministry of Education, Sports, and Youth Affairs Guiso, L., Monte, F., Saprenza, P., Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, Gender and Math. Science (New York, N.Y.) 320. 1164-1165. Jha, J, Menon, N. and Chatterjee, D. (2017). Boys’ Underperformance in Education: Revisiting the Issue in the Commonwealth. Commonwealth of Learning. Learning for Sustainable Development. http://hdl.handle.net/11599/2810 Johnson, B. (2016) The Impact of Single Sex Classrooms on the Academic Achievement and Attitude of Boys in a Rural Primary School in Jamaica. The Mico University College Journal of Education, 7, 110-126. Knodel, J. & Saengtienchai, C. (1999). Studying living arrangement of the elderly: Lessons from a quasi- qualitative case study in Thailand, Journal of cross-cultural Gerontology 14(3), 197-220 Levy, H. (2012). Youth Violence and Organized Crime in Jamaica: Causes and Counter-Measures, An Examination of Linkages and Disconnections Institute of Criminal Justice and Security – UWI. https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org Lindguist, C, Buck-Willison, J, Rossman, S., Hardison-Walters, J., & Lawrence, P., (2015). Second Chance Act Adult Offender Re-entry Demonstration Program: Implementation, Challenges & Lessons Learned. Research Triangle Institute, Urban Institute, Washington, DC Marcus, J. (2017). Why Men are the New College Minority. The Atlantic Education, The Atlantic Monthly Group. https://www.amp.theatlantic.com McFadden, M. (1996) Second Chance Education: accessing opportunity or recycling disadvantaged? International Studies in Sociology of Education, 6(1) 87-111. http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/riss20 Miller, E. (1991). Men at Risk. Jamaica Publishing House Ltd, Kgn (Digitized 2009) Ministry of Education, Youth and Information (2021) Literacy, numeracy results show girls out mastering boys. https://moey.gov.jm/literacy-numeray-results-show-girls-outmastering-boys Ministry of Education, Youth and Information (2021) Male Students Outperform Females in Four CSEC subjects. https://moey.gov.jm/male-students-outperform-females-four-csec-subjects Noguero, P. (2003). Social and Economic Studies, 52(2) 167-170. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27865332 Nollenberger, N., Rodriquez-Planas, Sevilla, A. (2014). Study on The Math Gender Gap: The Role of Culture (Discussion Paper). IZA-Institute for the Study of Labour. https://www.ftp.iza.org Office of The Children Advocate (2011). A Study of the Profile of Children in conflict with Law in Jamaica. https://www.welcome.oca.gov.jm Parry, O. (1997). Schooling is fooling: Why do Jamaican boys underachieve in school? Gender and Education, 9(2), 223-231 Prigge, D.J. (2002). Promote Brain-Based Teaching and Learning. Intervention in School & Clinic. 37(4), 237-241 Richardson-Pious, C. (2020). Presentation on At Risk Youth Issues and Challenges in Jamaica. Children First. https://www.iyfglobal.org Ritchie, H and Roser, M. (2019). Gender Ratio. OurWorld.org. https://ourworldindata.org/gender-ratio Savelsberg, H; Pignata, S.; & Weekert, P. (2017). Second Chance Education: barriers, support and engagement strategies, University of Australia, Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 57(1), April 2017 Schneider, E. (1996). Giving students a voice in the classroom; Creating a climate for learning, Educational Leadership 54(1), 22-26. www.ascd.org/publications/educational- leadership/sept96/vol54/num01/giving-students-a-Voice-in-the-Classroom.asp Taba, H. (1962), Curriculum Development, pp 347-378, in Williams, D. (2013). Principled Curriculum design – Taunton Teaching Alliance Ullah, R., and H. (2019), Boys versus Girls’ educational performance: Empirical evidences from global north and global south. Net Journal Dept. of Sociology, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan. Accepted 25 September 2019 https://www.ftp.iza.org/ https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/ https://www.amp.theatlantic.com/ http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/riss20 https://moey.gov.jm/literacy-numeray-results-show-girls-outmastering-boys http://www.jstor.org/stable/27865332 https://www.ftp.iza.org/ January 2025 | Volume 4, Number 2 14 United Nations, (2015). The World’s Women 2015: Trends & Statistics, New York: United Nations Department of Economics & Social Affairs, Statistics Division. https://unstats.un.org Vantiegham, W., Vermeersch, H. and Van Houtte, M. (2014). Why Gender disappeared from the gender gap: (re-)introducing gender identity theory to educational gender gap research. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 357-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9248- 8 Waterford.org (2019). How to use Brain-Based Learning in the Classroom. https://www.waterford.org Weathersby, I. Jr. (2015). A Second Chance: Education’s Role Reversing Mass Incarceration. The Atlantic Education, The Atlantic Monthly Group. https://www.amp.theatlantic.com https://unstats.un.org/ https://www.waterford.org/ https://www.amp.theatlantic.com/