All articles are permanently available online to the public without restrictions or subscription fees. All articles are free to be used, cited, and distributed, on condition that appropriate acknowledgment is included. Authors are the copyright holders of their original contributions and grant the Canadian Online Publication Group (COPG) a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. CPOJ articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CPOJ Website: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/index Editorial Office: cpoj@online-publication.com ISSN: 2561-987X CPOJ is a member of, and subscribes to the principles of, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). VOLUME 5, ISSUE 1 2022 RESEARCH ARTICLE Frengopoulos C, Zia Z, Payne M.W.C, Viana R, Hunter S.W. Association between balance self-efficacy and walking ability in those with new lower limb amputations. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 https://online-publication.com/wp/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/index mailto:cpoj@online-publication.com https://publicationethics.org/about/our-organisation https://publicationethics.org/about/our-organisation https://publicationethics.org/members/canadian-prosthetics-orthotics-journal https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 1 Frengopoulos C, Zia Z, Payne M.W.C, Viana R, Hunter S.W. Association between balance self-efficacy and walking ability in those with new lower limb amputations. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 RESEARCH ARTICLE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BALANCE SELF-EFFICACY AND WALKING ABILITY IN THOSE WITH NEW LOWER LIMB AMPUTATIONS Frengopoulos C 1*, Zia Z 2, Payne M.W.C 3, 4, Viana R 3, 4, Hunter S.W 1,4, 5 1 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. 2 Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, London, Ontario, Canada. 3 Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Parkwood Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. 4 Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. 5 School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. INTRODUCTION Individuals encounter significant physical, psychological and social consequences following the loss of a limb.1 While the physical concerns of decreased mobility are paramount, there are also difficulties with community participation and body image that requires attention.2 Rehabilitation for lower limb amputation (LLA) is multidisciplinary and goals include restoring independent mobility and enhancing quality of life (QOL).3 Performance on objective measures of mobility is often considered to be the gold standard for evaluating rehabilitation progress or success.4 However, subjective assessments can also be considered as they may provide insight for perceived mobility in scenarios not tested in clinical environment. There is an established trend in OPEN ACCESS Volume 5, Issue 1, Article No.4. 2022 Journal Homepage: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/index ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: A relationship between walking ability and self-efficacy has been demonstrated in various rehabilitation patient populations. In experienced prosthetic ambulators, walking ability is related to self-efficacy of balance, however, this relationship has not been quantified for those with newly acquired lower limb amputations (LLA). OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate the association between walking performance (objective) and self- reported walking abilities (subjective) on balance self-efficacy in those with LLA. METHODOLOGY: Cross-sectional study of 27 people (17 men; mean age=63.57±9.33) at discharge from inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation for first major unilateral LLA. Individuals completed 6m straight path walking and the L-Test under single- and dual-task conditions. The Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) was administered, and the Ambulation subscale provided subjective measures of walking ability. A single PEQ question on satisfaction with walking (16B) was also used as a proxy for subjective walking ability. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale measured balance self- efficacy. Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the strength of association between walking ability (objective and subjective) and balance self-efficacy (dependent variable). FINDINGS: Walking velocity on the 6m straight path under single-task (p=0.011) and dual-task conditions (p=0.039), the single-task L-Test (p=0.035) and self-reported satisfaction with walking (p=0.019) were associated with self-efficacy of balance. CONCLUSION: Objective measures of walking ability that were independently associated with balance self-efficacy included straight path walking velocity under single and dual-task conditions and the single- task L-Test. Satisfaction with walking was also associated with balance self-efficacy. This highlights the interplay between physical and psychological factors during rehabilitation. More research in the area of self-efficacy and walking ability is needed to establish self-efficacy as a target during prosthetic rehabilitation for those with LLA. ARTICLE INFO Received: August 8, 2021 Accepted: January 2, 2022 Published: January 11, 2022 CITATION Frengopoulos C, Zia Z, Payne M.W.C, Viana R, Hunter S.W. Association between balance self- efficacy and walking ability in those with new lower limb amputations. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.3 6695 KEYWORDS Amputation, Self-Efficacy, Balance Confidence, Walking Ability, Rehabilitation, PEQ * CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Courtney Frengopoulos, University of Western Ontario, Room 1408, Elborn College, London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 1H1. Email: cfrengop@uwo.ca ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4131-2727 https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/index https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 mailto:cfrengop@uwo.ca https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4131-2727 2 Frengopoulos C, Zia Z, Payne M.W.C, Viana R, Hunter S.W. Association between balance self-efficacy and walking ability in those with new lower limb amputations. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 ISSN: 2561-987X ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BALANCE SELF-EFFICACY AND WALKING ABILITY Frengopoulos et al., 2022 CPOJ walking ability following prosthetic rehabilitation for LLA; the largest improvements in self-reported functional mobility occur between 6 weeks and 4 months post-surgery, after which time function plateaus.5 While mobility and function improve during rehabilitation, the LLA population may experience difficulties with gait that persist long-term.6,7 Falls are a particular concern in this population, as over half of those with LLA fall at least once annually.8,9 After a fall, older individuals without LLA may limit their walking due to impact on self-efficacy and a fear of falling.9 However, walking is crucial for social participation and maintaining QOL in those with LLA.10 As such, the impact of psychological factors on walking ability in this population have been investigated. Research indicates that factors such as self-efficacy may impact upon the rehabilitation goals of social activity and community integration for those with LLA.11,12 Self-efficacy is an individual’s belief in their ability to perform a certain task.13 Developing self-efficacy may be done through observing successful peers or through verbal persuasion from credible individuals, such as physicians.13,14 However, the strongest sources of self- efficacy are mastery experiences; other sources are generally weak and are likely to deteriorate.14,15 Mastery experiences are the successful completion of a specific task.15 These experiences can build upon each other as an individual accomplishes progressively more difficult activities.15 As such, the mastery experience of ambulating with a prosthetic device would be expected to strongly impact a person’s sense of competence and self-efficacy. Research has demonstrated a positive relationship between walking performance and self-efficacy following a stroke,16 in those with knee osteoarthritis,17,18 for those with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease,19 and in individuals with multiple sclerosis.20 However, the experience following LLA is different to these populations as the latter have previous mastery experiences from which they derive their self- efficacy. At the onset of rehabilitation, all tasks relating to the prosthetic device are novel. Prosthetic training provides a series of mastery experiences for new skills related to the use of a prosthesis, allowing those with LLA to develop self- efficacy. Individuals also receive encouragement from clinicians during their time in prosthetic rehabilitation and are able to observe fellow patients. Levels of self-efficacy during this rehabilitation process have not been reported, however, for more experienced prosthetic ambulators, walking ability is related to balance self-efficacy.12 Physical and psychological factors are both important considerations for rehabilitation following LLA. For the psychological factor of self-efficacy to be addressed as a target during the rehabilitation process, a better understanding of the relationship between walking ability and self-efficacy is needed. To quantify the relationship between self-efficacy of balance and walking ability in those with LLA, self-reported measures of ability and objective walking performance must be carried out. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between walking performance (objective) and self-reported walking ability (subjective) on balance self-efficacy in those with LLA at discharge from inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation. It is hypothesized that at this stage in the rehabilitation process straight path walking and complex path walking under single-task conditions, as well as patient satisfaction with walking, will be related to balance self-efficacy. METHODOLOGY Design and Participants This was a cross-sectional study of individuals completing inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation for first major LLA. Participants were recruited from the Regional Amputee Rehabilitation Program at Parkwood Institute in London, Ontario between March 2016 and April 2017. The study was approved by the University of Western Ontario Ethics Board, and by the Lawson Health Research Institute Clinical Resources Impact Committee. All individuals provided written informed consent prior to participating in the study. Individuals participating in an inpatient rehabilitation program for their first major, unilateral LLA were recruited prior to discharge. LLA at the level of transtibial or above were considered major amputations; these were selected as the represent the most common levels seen in prosthetic rehabilitation programs. All individuals were new prosthetic ambulators as they were fitted with a prosthesis upon commencement of inpatient rehabilitation. Admission criteria to inpatient rehabilitation include achievable rehabilitation and prosthetic goals, medically stable and sufficiently conditioned to undergo a training program, ability to learn and retain new skills, and emotionally and socially (housing, funding, outside responsibilities, etc.) prepared to participate. Training involved prosthetic limb fitting, limb care and management, and safe skill learning to progress from transfers to gait training with the use of various gait aids. Eligibility criteria for the current study were: ≥50 years of age, functional use of English and ability to walk 10m without assistance from another person. Exclusion criteria included any physical problem that significantly limited movement or presence of severe depression. Those were severe depression were excluded as depression can negatively impact performance on cognitive tasks requiring attention and visuospatial abilities, especially in older adults.21 A total of 27 participants were recruited during the study period. The following demographic and medical history information was obtained: age, sex, height, weight, level of amputation, etiology of amputation, time since amputation, use of walking aid at discharge, level of education, medications, https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 3 Frengopoulos C, Zia Z, Payne M.W.C, Viana R, Hunter S.W. Association between balance self-efficacy and walking ability in those with new lower limb amputations. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 ISSN: 2561-987X ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BALANCE SELF-EFFICACY AND WALKING ABILITY Frengopoulos et al., 2022 CPOJ comorbidities, history of falls in the past 12 months, global cognitive status as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Objective Measures of Walking Ability The L-Test is a complex walking task that evaluates functional mobility for those with LLA.22 Testing was carried out under single- and dual-task conditions with standardized instructions.22,23 Using standard instructions, participants began sitting on an armless chair and upon the word “go” rose to standing and walked 3 meters, turned 90 degrees, walked 7 meters, turned 180 degrees, and walked the same path to return to a seated position. Patients walked at their usual pace and were timed to the nearest 100th of a second. A 6m straight path assessed gait velocity (cm/s) under single- and dual-task conditions. Participants walked at their usual pace along the GAITRite® System electronic walkway (CIR Systems, Franklin, NJ). One-meter acceleration and deceleration zones were provided to ensure only steady state walking was captured. Assessment of gait velocity using the GAITRite® System was performed separately to the walking assessment using the L-Test. Subjective Measures of Walking Ability The Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) is a self- administered tool that evaluates prosthetic related QOL.24 It consists of 9 stand-alone subscales including Ambulation, Appearance, Frustration, Perceived Response, Residual Limb Health, Social Burden, Sounds, Utility and Well Being. The Ambulation subscale was used to assess self- perceived walking ability (questions 13A, 13B, 13C, 13D, 14E, 14F, 14G, 14H).24 The following standalone question relating to participant satisfaction (question 16B) was also used: “Over the past four weeks, rate how satisfied you have been with how you are walking”. Questions utilize a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from “cannot” (0) to “no problem” (100). Higher scores indicate a more positive response.24 The complete PEQ was administered to participants. Measure of Balance Self-Efficacy The ABC Scale is a 16-item tool that evaluates balance confidence, or self-efficacy of balance.25 Participants rate how confident they are in performing activities without losing their balance or becoming unsteady, from 0% to 100%. A mean of the 16 items gives the overall score, with higher scores indicating better balance self-efficacy.25 The scale has good test-retest reliability and internal consistency in the LLA population.26 Testing Protocol Single-task (walking test alone) and dual-task (walking task paired with cognitively demanding task) walking assessments were performed in this study. Demographic and clinical information was collected first. Following this, walking tasks were demonstrated by a research assistant. Participants then completed single-task assessments and received a 5-minute break before completing dual-task testing. Only one trial per walking test was completed. Dual- task testing using a cognitively demanding task was used to more closely approximate real-world walking.27 The task chosen to represent this increased cognitive load was serial subtraction by 3’s, starting from a randomly selected number between 100 and 150. Participants were instructed to count aloud as they walked, and responses were recorded. No instructions on task prioritization were given. All assessments occurred within 48 hours of discharge. Patients used their usual gait aids to perform walking tests. A standardized protocol, based on Hunter et al.,23 was used during testing. Statistical Analysis Variables were calculated as means and SDs or frequencies and percentages, as appropriate. Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the strength of association between walking ability (objective and subjective) and balance self-efficacy (dependent variable). Regression diagnostics were performed to ensure assumptions for linear regressions were met. To generate the most parsimonious model, analysis was adjusted for age, level of amputation, number of comorbidities and number of medications. These variables were selected based on the literature and their clinical significance.2,28,29 Due to the small sample size of the current study, no subgroup analysis based on level of amputation was performed. Significance level was set to p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 24.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). RESULTS Demographics are summarized in Table 1. Twenty-seven participants were included in the study. Many participants (77.8%, n=21) had transtibial amputations; the remainder of the participants had transfemoral amputations. Almost 2/3rds of the study participants were male (63%, n=17). The mean balance self-efficacy rating using the ABC scale was 69.48 ± 14.50, with scores ranging from 35.63 to 89.69. Results from objective and subjective measures of walking ability are presented in Table 2. After adjusting for confounders, single-task and dual-task walking velocity along the 6m straight path were both found to be independently associated with self-efficacy of balance (Table 3). For every 1cm/s increase in walking velocity along a 6m path, balance self-efficacy increases by 0.32 for single-task (p=0.011) and 0.28 for dual-task conditions (p=0.039). https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 4 Frengopoulos C, Zia Z, Payne M.W.C, Viana R, Hunter S.W. Association between balance self-efficacy and walking ability in those with new lower limb amputations. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 ISSN: 2561-987X ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BALANCE SELF-EFFICACY AND WALKING ABILITY Frengopoulos et al., 2022 CPOJ Table 1: Demographic and study characteristics of older adults with first major, unilateral lower limb amputation at discharge from prosthetic rehabilitation. (n=27). Characteristics Values Age (years) 63.6 ± 9.3 Sex (men) 17 (63.0%) Body Mass Index (kg/m2) 27.4 ± 5.4 Amputation level (n, % transtibial) 21 (77.8%) Time between amputation and discharge (days) 142.6 ± 74.6 Fall in the previous 12 months? (n, % yes) 19 (70.4%) Self-reported number of falls 2.1 ± 2.7 Montreal Cognitive Assessment 25.7 ± 2.9 Primary Etiology of Amputation (n, %): Diabetes Mellitus 17 (63.0%) Peripheral Vascular Disease 4 (14.8%) Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Vascular Disease 1 (3.7%) Trauma, Cancer or Other (clotting disorders, infection, etc.) 5 (18.5%) Number of medications 10.2 ± 4.6 Number of comorbidities 5.4 ± 2.2 Walking aid use at discharge (n, %): Single Cane 3 (11.1%) Two Canes 3 (11.1%) Forearm Crutches 1 (3.7%) Standard Walker 1 (3.7%) Rollator Walker 19 (70.4%) Table 2: Results of objective and subjective measures of walking ability at discharge from prosthetic rehabilitation. (n=27). Abbreviations: PEQ, Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire. Variables Mean ± SD Objective: 6m straight path, single task walking velocity (cm/s) 48.98 ± 25.26 6m straight path, dual task walking velocity (cm/s) 42.54 ± 22.86 L-Test, single-task walking time (seconds) 79.89 ± 53.01 L-Test, dual-task walking time (seconds) 97.90 ± 70.40 Subjective: PEQ Ambulation subscale 68.22 ± 19.09 PEQ 13A: Walking ability w/prosthesis 81.82 ± 16.32 PEQ 13B: Ability to walk in close spaces w/prosthesis 76.33 ± 24.80 PEQ 13C: Walk up-stairs w/prosthesis 78.16 ± 20.30 PEQ 13D: Walk down stairs w/prosthesis 77.72 ± 21.48 PEQ 14E: Walk up hill w/prosthesis 54.76 ± 33.17 PEQ 14F: Walk down-hill w/prosthesis 53.71 ± 32.14 PEQ 14G: Walk sidewalks w/prosthesis 77.83 ± 30.88 PEQ 14H: Walk on slippery surfaces w/prosthesis 45.43 ± 30.77 PEQ question 16B - Satisfaction with walking 88.44 ± 11.80 Single-task performance on the L-Test and satisfaction with walking were also independently associated with self- efficacy of balance (Table 3). For every one second decrease in performance on the L-Test balance self-efficacy increases by 0.17 (p=0.035), and for every 1-point increase in satisfaction with walking self-efficacy increases by 0.60 (p=0.019). No associations between the other objective or subjective measures and balance self-efficacy were found. DISCUSSION This study is the first to investigate associations between subjective and objective measures of walking ability and balance self-efficacy in those with LLA at discharge from prosthetic rehabilitation. We identified that straight path walking velocity under single and dual-task conditions, time to complete the single-task L-Test and self-reported satisfaction with walking were associated with balance self- efficacy at discharge from rehabilitation. This indicates that performance on both objective and subjective measures of walking ability influence the reported balance self-efficacy of individuals with LLA at this point in the prosthetic rehabilitation process. The relationship between self-efficacy and motor learning is circular. As individuals gain self-efficacy they create more challenging goals; striving for these goals benefits motor learning and performance, leading to further goal setting.30 According to Bandura, the more mastery experiences that one has, the higher they perceive their ability;15 this perception of one’s capabilities may be more related to performance than physical ability itself.14,15 This is an important consideration for individuals with LLA, as levels of balance self-efficacy tend to be low.12,31 The results from the current study highlights the relationship between walking ability and self-efficacy of balance at a single point in the rehabilitation journey. Further research is needed to fully understand the longitudinal relationship between self- efficacy, goal setting and walking ability for those with LLAs. Table 3: Results of multivariable linear regression for the association of objective (6m straight path and L-test walking tests) and subjective (PEQ) measures of walking ability on self efficacy (Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale). Abbreviations: β, regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval; PEQ, Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire. *Adjusted for age, level of amputation, number of comorbidities, number of medications. Gait Variable Unadjusted β (95% CI) Adjusted β (95% CI)* Objective: 6m straight path: Single task walking velocity (cm/s) Dual task walking velocity (cm/s) 0.37 (0.19, 0.55), p<0.001 0.35 (0.13, 0.57), p=0.003 0.32 (0.08, 0.56), p=0.011 0.28 (0.02, 0.54), p=0.039 L-Test: Single-task walking time (seconds) Dual-task walking time (seconds) -0.17 (-0.26, -0.09), p<0.001 -0.11 (-0.18, -0.04) p=0.005 -0.17 (-0.33, -0.01), p=0.035 -0.08 (-0.20, 0.04), p=0.164 Subjective: PEQ Ambulation Subscale Total Score 0.35 (0.07, 0.63), p=0.016 0.22 (-0.08, 0.52), p=0.140 PEQ 16B: Satisfaction with walking 0.80 (0.41, 1.18), p<0.001 0.60 (0.11, 1.08), p=0.019 https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 5 Frengopoulos C, Zia Z, Payne M.W.C, Viana R, Hunter S.W. Association between balance self-efficacy and walking ability in those with new lower limb amputations. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 ISSN: 2561-987X ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BALANCE SELF-EFFICACY AND WALKING ABILITY Frengopoulos et al., 2022 CPOJ The 6m walk was the simplest measure performed by participants. In contrast, the L-Test is more complex as it incorporates transfers and turning,22 and dual-task testing provides an additional cognitive challenge to mimic real- world multi-tasking.27 As individuals progress through prosthetic rehabilitation, they gain self-efficacy through mastery of simple tasks, external coaching from expert clinicians and vicarious experiences of observing fellow patients.13-15 Confidence in performing more complex tasks develops later.15 The dual-task L-test is the most complex task that individuals were asked to perform in the current study. Therefore, it is possible that participants have not yet developed balance self-efficacy relating to this task. It is expected that individuals will continue to develop self- efficacy of balance through mastery experiences of more difficult walking tasks as they begin to ambulate in the community.5 As self-efficacy is activity specific, a task- specific intervention to improve self-efficacy may be a new target for interventions to improve walking ability for those with LLA. Task-oriented balance and walking interventions have been demonstrated to improve self-efficacy for individuals following a stroke.32 Predictors of walking ability following LLA have been widely described in the literature.2,33 Previously identified factors tend to refer to physical or objective findings such as level of amputation, age, physical fitness and etiology of amputation,2,33 and have not included the influence of psychological factors. However, Hamamura et al.34 did identify motivation to walk as a predictive factor for prosthetic rehabilitation in older adults with LLA. Previous research has also highlighted that while objective measures of walking ability improve following discharge from rehabilitation, subjective measures of walking ability do not.31 Self-efficacy and motivation, along with other psychological factors, may help to explain why subjective measures of walking ability do not improve. The current study adds to the literature and highlights the relationship between the psychological factor of balance self-efficacy and walking ability for those with LLA. More research on the relationship between psychological factors and their effects on subjective measures of walking ability is needed. Study Limitations These results represent individuals with unilateral LLA at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. More time with a prosthesis may impact self-efficacy of balance and the relationships described. The individuals in this study were >50 years of age, so results may not be relevant for younger cohorts or those with fewer comorbidities. Transtibial and transfemoral levels of amputation were both represented in the current study, however no subgroup analysis based on level of amputation was performed due to small sample size. Also, for those with transfemoral amputations, the type of knee componentry was not recorded. Therefore, the current study is not able to comment on the impact of level of amputation or prosthetic components on the relationship between balance self- efficacy and walking ability. Analysis based on level of amputation should be considered for further studies. Also, the objective walking measures used in the current study only examine short walking distances. Therefore, the association between objective measures of walking ability and balance self-efficacy cannot be generalized to longer walking measures or measures of endurance. Finally, the current study has a small sample size, which may be underpowered to detect the changes in all variables measured. In future, larger sample sizes should be used to confirm the results. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the interplay between physical and psychological factors during rehabilitation for LLA. Straight- path walking velocity under single and dual-task conditions, performance on the L-Test and self-reported satisfaction with walking are independently associated with self-efficacy of balance. However, the complex task of completing the dual-task L-Test was not found to be associated. Further research regarding other factors that may be associated with or influence self-efficacy is needed in the LLA population. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to extend a thank you to all those who participated in this study. We sincerely appreciate your time and contribution to helping advance rehabilitation for this population. DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS The authors have nothing to disclose. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION Each author has made an equal contribution to the manuscript in the following areas: (1) concept or design of the work, or acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data; (2) drafted or critically revised the article; (3) approved the version to be published; (4) participated sufficiently to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content. SOURCES OF SUPPORT This work was supported by the St. Joseph’s Healthcare Foundation Cognitive Vitality and Brain Health Seed Funding Opportunity in London, Ontario, Canada. The funding body had no involvement in the conduct of the study. ETHICAL APPROVAL The study was approved by the University of Western Ontario Ethics Board, and by the Lawson Health Research Institute Clinical https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 6 Frengopoulos C, Zia Z, Payne M.W.C, Viana R, Hunter S.W. Association between balance self-efficacy and walking ability in those with new lower limb amputations. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 ISSN: 2561-987X ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BALANCE SELF-EFFICACY AND WALKING ABILITY Frengopoulos et al., 2022 CPOJ Resources Impact Committee. All individuals provided written informed consent prior to participating in the study. REFERENCES 1.Horgan O, Maclachlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: A review. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;26(14/15):837–50. DOI: 10.1080/09638280410001708869 2.Sansam K, Neumann V, O’Connor R, Bhakta B. Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: A systematic review of the literature. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(8):593–603. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0393 3.Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, Maclachlan M, Ryall N. Understanding the benefits of prosthetic prescription: exploring the experiences of practitioners and lower limb prosthetic users. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15–16):1314–23. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2010. 529234 4.Hart-Hughes S, Latlief GA, Phillips S, Groer S, Highsmith MJ. A review of clinical outcome assessment instruments for gait, balance, and fall risk in persons with lower extremity amputation. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2014;30(1):70–6. DOI: 10.1097/TGR. 0b013e318215cbb3 5.Czerniecki JM, Turner AP, Williams RM, Hakimi KN, Norvell DC. Mobility changes in individuals with dysvascular amputation from the presurgical period to 12 months postamputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(10):1766–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012. 04.011 6.Ganz DA, Bao Y, Shekelle PG, Rubenstein LZ. Will my patient fall? JAMA. 2007;297(1):77–86. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.1.77 7.Latlief G, Elnitsky C, Kent R. Lower extremity amputation. in: batmangelich s, cristian a, editors. physical medicine and rehabilitation patient-centered care. New York, NY: Demos Medical Publishing; 2014. p. 409. 8.Miller WC, Speechley M, Deathe AB. The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):1031–7. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24295 9.Moore DS, Ellis R. Measurement of fall-related psychological constructs among independent-living older adults: A review of the research literature. Aging Ment Health. 2008;12(6):684–99. DOI: 10.1080/13607860802148855 10.Suckow BD, Goodney PP, Nolan BW, Veeraswamy RK, Gallagher P, Cronenwett JL, et al. Domains that determine quality of life in vascular amputees. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(4):722–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.12.005 11.Deathe AB, Miller WC, Speechley M. The status of outcome measurement in amputee rehabilitation in Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(7):912–8. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.33221 12.Miller WC, Deathe AB. A prospective study examining balance confidence among individuals with lower limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(14–15):875–81. DOI: 10.1080/ 09638280410001708887 13.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. DOI: 10.1037/0033- 295X.84.2.191 14.Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):248–87. DOI: 10.1016/ 0749-5978(91)90022-L 15.Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol. 1982;37(2):122–47. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 16.Danks KA, Pohlig RT, Roos M, Wright TR, Reisman DS. Relationship between walking capacity, biopsychosocial factors, self-efficacy, and walking activity in persons poststroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016;40(4):232–8. DOI: 10.1097/NPT. 0000000000000143 17.Harrison AL. The Influence of pathology, pain, balance, and self- efficacy on function in women with osteoarthritis of the knee. Phys Ther. 2004;84(9):822–31. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/84.9.822 18.Maly MR, Costigan PA, Olney SJ. Contribution of psychosocial and mechanical variables to physical performance measures in knee osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. 2005;85(12):1318–28. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/85.12.1318 19.Collins TC, Lunos S, Ahluwalia JS. Self-efficacy is associated with walking ability in persons with diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Med. 2010;15(3):189–95. DOI: 10.1177/1358863X10362604 20.Motl RW, Balto JM, Ensari I, Hubbard EA. Self-efficacy, and walking performance in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2017;41(2):114–8. DOI: 10.1097/NPT. 0000000000000172 21.Morimoto SS, Kanellopoulos T, Alexopoulos GS. Cognitive impairment in depressed older adults: implications for prognosis and treatment. Psychiatr Ann. 2014;44(3):138. DOI: 10.3928/00485713-20140306-05 22.Deathe AB, Miller WC. The L test of functional mobility: measurement properties of a modified version of the timed “Up & Go” test designed for people with lower-limb amputations. Phys Ther. 2005;85(7):626–35. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/85.7.626 23.Hunter SW, Frengopoulos C, Holmes J, Viana R, Payne MW. Determining reliability of a dual-task functional mobility protocol for individuals with lower extremity amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(4):707–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.008 24.Legro MW, Reiber GD, Smith DG, Del Aguila M, Larsen J, Boone D. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: Assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(8):931–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0003- 9993(98)90090-9 25.Powell LE, Myers AM. The activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50A(1):M28–34. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/50A.1.M28 26.Miller WC, Deathe AB, Speechley M. Psychometric properties of the activities-specific balance confidence scale among individuals with a lower-limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(5):656–61. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)04807-4 27.Yogev G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The Role of Executive Function and Attention in Gait. Mov Disord. 2008;23(3):329–472. DOI: 10.1002/mds.21720. 28.Murdoch G. Levels of amputation and limiting factors. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1967;40(4):204–16. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 7 Frengopoulos C, Zia Z, Payne M.W.C, Viana R, Hunter S.W. Association between balance self-efficacy and walking ability in those with new lower limb amputations. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695 ISSN: 2561-987X ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BALANCE SELF-EFFICACY AND WALKING ABILITY Frengopoulos et al., 2022 CPOJ 29.Frengopoulos C, Burley J, Viana R, Payne MW, Hunter SW. Association between Montreal cognitive assessment scores and measures of functional mobility in lower extremity amputees after inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.012 30.Kyllo LB, Landers DM. Goal setting in sport and exercise: A research synthesis to resolve the controversy. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1995;17(2):117–37. DOI: 10.1123/jsep.17.2.117 31.Cieslak G, Omana H, Madou E, Frengopoulos C, Viana R, Payne MW, et al. Association between changes in subjective and objective measures of mobility in people with lower limb amputations after inpatient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;99(11). DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001490 32.Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Robichaud-Ekstrand S, Hanley JA, Richards CL, Wood-Dauphinee S. The effect of a task-oriented walking intervention on improving balance self-efficacy poststroke: A randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):576– 82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53203.x 33.Kahle JT, Highsmith MJ, Schaepper H, Johannesson A, Orendurff MS, Kaufman K. Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: An updated systematic literature review. Technol Innov. 2016;18(2–3):125–37. DOI: 10.21300/18.2-3.2016.125 34.Hamamura S, Chin T, Kuroda R, Akisue T, Iguchi T, Kohno H, et al. Factors affecting prosthetic rehabilitation outcomes in amputees of age 60 years and over. Int. J. Med. Res. 2009;37(6):1921–7. DOI: 10.1177/147323000903700630 https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36695