v5i2a2_authors_FINAL Research Article 16 Ved ABSTRACT Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy has established antidepressant effects. Cannabis users appear to expect high doses administered in a session much like psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy to create comparable subjective effects. The current studies explored expectations of antidepressant effects of such cannabis-assisted sessions to replicate and extend previous work. Users not only expected a cannabis-assisted psychotherapy session to decrease depression, but also to alter some of the same mediators of psychedelic or psychological treatments. Over 500 participants in Study I envisioned a cannabis-assisted therapy session akin to those used in psychedelic therapies and reported the effects that they expected on depression as well as relevant subjective reactions. A second sample of over 500 participants responded to identical measures and an index of dysfunctional attitudes that appears to mediate antidepressant effects of psychotherapy. Expectancies of cannabis-induced antidepressant effects covaried with expected psychedelic effects. Participants also envisioned that cannabis-assisted therapy would alter dysfunctional attitudes, which served as a separate, unique path to expected antidepressant effects unrelated to the subjective effects of psychedelics. These results add support to arguments for relevant clinical trials of cannabis-assisted psychotherapy and suggest that cannabis users would expect it to work in ways similar to psychedelics as well as cognitive therapy. Key words: = tetrahydrocannabinol; oceanic boundlessness; mystical experiences; psychedelic- assisted psychotherapy; depression Depression’s dramatic, negative impact remains concerning as over 300 million people worldwide appear to suffer from the disorder (WHO, 2017). Combining standard antidepressant medications with psychotherapy helps approximately 65% of individuals, but leaves many others unimproved (see Cuijpers et al., 2020; Earleywine & De Leo, 2020). The link Mitch Earleywine1, Maha N. Mian1, Brianna R. Altman1, Joseph A. De Leo2 1Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, USA 2Centre for Compassionate Care, Ontario, Canada Cannabis 2022, Volume 5 (2) © Author(s) 2022 researchmj.org DOI: 10.26828/cannabis/2022.02.02 Expectancies for Cannabis- Induced Emotional Breakthrough, Mystical Experiences and Changes in Dysfunctional Attitudes: Perceptions of the Potential for Cannabis-Assisted Psychotherapy for Depression Corresponding Author: Mitch Earleywine, PhD, Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, USA. Email: mearleywine@albany.edu Cannabis, A Publication of the Research Society on Marijuana 17 between cannabis and depression remains controversial. Cannabis might cause, cure, or have only spurious links to the disorder (Feingold & Weinstein, 2021). Cannabis consumption and depression appear to vary depending upon forms of administration, the presence of confounding factors, and numerous individual difference variables (e.g. Bricker et al., 2007; Grinspoon & Bakalar, 1997; Lev-Ran et al., 2014). For example, recent work reveals that many cannabis users report that their consumption of the plant addresses depressive symptoms (Gorfinkel et al., 2020; Kosiba et al., 2019), but adolescents who use cannabis seem to be at greater risk for subsequent depressive mood or suicidal ideation (Gobbi et al., 2019). Turning to the plant as an attempt at self- medication might be common, but frequent, relatively low-dose use might be ill-advised. Longitudinal data suggest that decreasing frequent use might improve depressive symptoms (Hser et al., 2004). These varied responses leave clinicians and clients in a quandary. In contrast, recent work suggests that a high dose of psilocybin, when administered in a therapeutic setting with sufficient support, precedes improvements in depression and other forms of human suffering (see Carhart-Harris et al., 2017, 2018; Schenberg, 2018). A comparable approach with cannabis seemed to have potential given parallels between reactions to high dose cannabis and psilocybin (Earleywine et al., 2021; Farmer et al., 2019). Three of the most promising subjective changes include a facet of Mystical Experiences dubbed Oceanic Boundlessness (OBN), a sense of connectedness with a lowered sense of self-importance known as Ego Dissolution (ED), and a categorical leap in affective experience called Emotional Breakthrough (EB). All three of these responses to a psychedelic predict subsequent improvements (e.g. Carhart-Harris et al., 2017; Garcia-Romeu et al., 2019; Nour et al., 2016; Roseman et al., 2018; Roseman et al., 2019; Uthaug et al., 2018). Generally, as these experiences increase, suffering decreases. In contrast, other changes in subjective state do not correlate consistently with improvements. For example, acute ketamine-induced dissociation might appear novel, but it does not predict subsequent antidepressant effects (Mathai et al., 2020). Cannabis at an ideal dose and low frequency might facilitate the relevant subjective experiences and improve depression as well (Earleywine et al., 2021). Spiritual traditions in some Sufi mystics, Tibetan Buddhists, Zion Coptics, Rastafarians, and Hindus emphasize that ideal dosages of cannabis consumed in appropriate settings precede mystical “peak experiences” (Ferrara, 2016, 2020), the same effects that predict psilocybin’s antidepressant effects. Although cannabis does not have the impact on the 5HT2A receptors common to psilocybin and other psychedelics (Curran et al., 2018; Russo & Marcu, 2017), their subjective effects overlap (Barrett et al., 2018; Earleywine et al., 2021; Farmer et al., 2019). One previous relevant study asked experienced cannabis users to envision a high-dose session that would parallel the comfortable environs, trained support from guides, and internal focus of psilocybin trials (Earleywine et al., 2021). Participants reported expecting such a cannabis-assisted session to generate OBN and decrease depression. A replication that extended those results to other facets of mystical experience that covary with improvement in depression appeared in order. Should a new sample report that cannabis might create the relevant subjective effects and that they expect antidepressant impact, the rationale for cannabis-facilitated psychotherapy might improve. STUDY 1 METHODS Participants A total of 560 lifetime cannabis users (274 (48.9%) self-identified as Female) passed attention checks and provided data on Amazon’s MTURK. The local IRB approved Cannabis Implications for Psychotherapy 18 all procedures. Ages ranged from 18 to 69 (Mean = 35.44, SD = 10.931) and education ranged from some high school to a graduate degree (Modal, median, and mean = Bachelor’s degree (262; 46.8%)). The sample included Caucasians (402; 71.8%), African descent (57; 10.2%), Asian (41; 7.3%), Latinx (34; 6.1%), Native American (17; 3%), and Multiracial (9; 1.6%) participants. Measures Cannabis consumption. Participants reported days per month they used cannabis (range 0-31, Mean = 13.35, SD = 10.3) and how high they would feel on average sessions (1 (not at all high) to 6 (very high), Mean = 3.40, SD = 1.265). Antidepressant effects of cannabis- assisted psychotherapy. Participants responded to: “New research suggests that depressed people can benefit from taking the hallucinogen psilocybin and sitting quietly in a safe laboratory setting while listening to music, wearing an eye mask, and focusing on the effects. Do you think an ideal dose of cannabis might help depression if administered under comparable circumstances?” from 0 (Not at all) to 100 (A great deal). Scores ranged from 0 to 100 (Mean = 65.40; SD = 26.384). We chose an ideal dose rather than specify a specific number of milligrams to allow for disparate rates of familiarity and tolerance. Subjective effects. We used multiple indices (emotional breakthrough, oceanic boundlessness, and ego dissolution) as detailed below. Participants read: “Here are some feelings others have reported in response to peak experiences of many kinds. Please think about your experiences while using an IDEAL DOSE OF CANNABIS and state how much each one applies to you. Please give your best guess on each one.” They then answered, “How much would an ideal dose of cannabis in the absence of other drugs make you…” and rated intensity. Emotional Breakthrough (EB). Participants rated the 8 items of the Emotional Breakthrough Scale (Roseman et al., 2019) from 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much). Dropping two reverse-scored items brought Cronbach’s alpha to .931 from .643. The average score per item (Mean = 48.0825; SD = 24.268) exceeded those in Roseman et al’s (2019) study (Mean = 43, SD = 31.5; t (937) = 2.787 p < .01; d = .181). Oceanic Boundlessness (OBN). Participants rated 27 items from the Oceanic Boundlessness subscale of the Altered States of Consciousness Scale (Dittrich, 1998) that showed the highest correlations with subsequent antidepressant effects (Roseman et al., 2018) of psilocybin at 5-week follow-up. The current sample described their likely response using the options of the Mystical Experiences Questionnaire (Griffiths et al., 2006), which covaries with Oceanic Boundlessness above R = .9 (Liechti et al., 2017). Participants responded with: 0 – none; not at all, 1 – so slight cannot decide, 2 – slight, 3 – moderate, 4 – strong (equivalent in degree to any other strong experience), or 5 – extreme (more than any other time in my life and stronger than 4). Cronbach’s alpha was .962. Scores ranged from 0-131 (Mean = 62.99, SD = 28.064). Ego Dissolution (ED). Participants rated the 8 items (Nour et al., 2016) from 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much), including “I lost all sense of ego” and “I experienced a decrease in my sense of self-importance.” ED predicted greater improvement in depression in previous work (e.g. Carhart-Harris et al., 2017; Garcia-Romeu et al., 2019; Uthaug et al., 2018). Cronbach’s alpha was .924; scores ranged from 0-800 (Mean = 352.232, SD = 184.877). RESULTS Only p’s < .01 were considered significant. P-P plots suggested normal distributions. Cannabis, A Publication of the Research Society on Marijuana 19 Table 1. Correlations Among Expectancies for Cannabis-Induced Mystical Experiences, Antidepressant Effects, and Use (N = 556) 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB ED .735** OBN .583** .712** Freq of Cannabis .322** .230** .155** .226** Avg High .484** .424** .381** .435** .476** Antidepress .497** .446** .316** .441** .274** .297** ** p < .01. EB = Emotional Breakthrough; ED = Ego Dissolution; OBN = Oceanic Boundlessness; Freq = Cannabis Use Days per month; Avg High = Average high per session; Antidep = Improvement in depression Demographic Correlates EB, ED, OBN, and expected antidepressant effects were orthogonal to age (maximum R = 0.12). Gender differences (based on self-selected gender identity) were non-significant (maximum Cohen’s d = 0.22), as were ethnic differences, which did not exceed d = 0.17, all p’s > .01. Correlations Pearson’s correlations (Table 1) reveal that subjective effects covaried and increased with cannabis involvement. Antidepressant Effects We regressed expected antidepressant effects of cannabis-assisted therapy on the expected subjective effects after removing 9 multivariate outliers to conform to assumptions. Only EB remained significant (Standardized Beta ED = -0.163, t = 2.427, R- squared change = .008 p = .016; Standardized Beta OBN = -0.045, t = -0.788, R-squared change = .001 p > .40; Standardized Beta EB = .410, t = 7.360, p < .01, R-squared change = .254, respectively). Participants apparently expect OBN and ED to improve depression via EB. DISCUSSION Cannabis might create subjective experiences comparable to those that seem important in psilocybin-assisted treatment (Earleywine et al., 2021). The current study attempted to replicate previous work showing that cannabis users believed that a cannabis- assisted psychotherapy session could increase OBN and improve depression while also extending the results to ED and EB. The expected antidepressant effects correlated significantly with subjective OBN, ED, and EB effects. The link between expected subjective experiences and expected antidepressant effects was no longer significant when EB was present as a predictor. Perhaps an emotional breakthrough is the key source of relevant changes in depression, at least according to what cannabis users expect. These results raise questions about other potential underlying mechanisms. Standard treatments for depression rarely rely on mystical experiences or emotional breakthroughs (see Cuijpers, 2017). In contrast, cognitive treatments for depression rest on dysfunctional attitudes (see Cristea et al., 2015). Meta-analytic work reveals that these maladaptive beliefs underlie negative Cannabis Implications for Psychotherapy 20 mood, depressive symptoms, and treatment- induced improvements. Even pharmacological treatments alter dysfunctional attitudes (Cristea et al., 2015). The import of this alternative mechanism in assisted therapy is unknown but connecting dysfunctional attitudes to assisted therapy might help explain how best to offer support and integration. The role of dysfunctional attitudes in other disorders also underscores their potential (see Wang et al., 2017; Yapan et al., 2020). Given clarion calls for replication (e.g. Amrhein et al., 2019), we sought to replicate these expected effects of a cannabis- assisted session and extend them to dysfunctional attitudes. We hypothesized that cannabis users would again anticipate that a cannabis-assisted session would decrease depression via the impact on OBN, ED, and EB. We also hypothesized that they would anticipate that the cannabis-assisted session would improve depression via dysfunctional attitudes. We were also eager to explore if dysfunctional attitudes mediated the link with depression independently of the session’s impact on OBN, ED, and EB. STUDY 2 METHODS Participants A total of 568 cannabis users (319; 56.1% Female) recruited from MTURK passed attention checks and provided complete data. The local IRB approved procedures. All IP addresses differed from those in Study I. Ages ranged from 18 to 68 (Mean = 35.09, SD = 10.415). The skew for age exceeded acceptable levels (.860; see Osborne, 2013), but decreased with a square-root transformation (.512). Education ranged from some high school to a graduate degree (Mode, median, and mean = Bachelor’s degree (217; 38.3%) followed by Some College (139; 24.5%)). The sample was primarily Caucasian (417; 73.4%), with African descent (56; 9.9%), Asian (40; 7.0%), Latinx (33; 5.8%), Native American (11; 1.9%), and Multiracial (11; 1.9%) participants as well. Current use averaged 14.81 days per month (SD = 11.63) with a subjective “high” averaging 3.45 (SD = 1.268). Measures Subjective effects. We used the same scales and instructions employed in Study I. Antidepressant Effects ranged from 0 to 100 (Mean = 74.00; SD = 24.994). Emotional Breakthrough (EB). The six- item version (Cronbach’s alpha = .931) ranged from 0-600 (Mean = 291.356, SD = 160.183), with an average item (Mean = 48.560, SD = 26.697) that exceeded scores reported previously (Roseman et al., 2019); (Mean = 43, SD = 31.5; t (945) = 2.919, p < .01; d = .190). Oceanic Boundlessness (OBN). The 27- item scale (Cronbach’s alpha =.962) ranged from 0-132 (Mean = 59.73, SD = 29.128). Ego Dissolution (ED). Scores ranged from 0-800 (Mean = 347.87, SD = 195.268). Cronbach’s alpha was .918. Dysfunctional attitudes. Participants rated how much they thought they would agree with maladaptive statements (from -2 (fully disagree) to +2 (fully agree)) both before and after a session of cannabis-assisted therapy (Beevers et al., 2007). Typical items included: “I must be liked by everyone or it’s a disaster,” and “If I fail partially, I have failed completely.” The “before” and “after” ratings were side by side in adjacent columns. Cronbach’s alpha (pre-treatment) was 0.890 (Mean = -2.57, SD = 13.322) and 0.889 (post- treatment; Mean = -8.29, SD = 12.783). A difference score ranged from -60 to 32 (Mean = -5.71; SD = 12.719). Negative skew (-0.986) required transformation by anchoring the lowest score at 1, subtracting total score from the maximum possible plus one and then computing the square root (skew = 0.062; Osborne, 2013). Higher scores were less dysfunctional. Cannabis, A Publication of the Research Society on Marijuana 21 RESULTS Only p’s < .01 were considered significant. P-P plots suggested normal distributions. Dysfunctional Attitudes Participants anticipated improved attitudes if they participated in the described cannabis session with an ideal dose and psychological support (Pre-treatment Mean = -2.737, SD = 13.33; Post-treatment Mean = - 8.443, SD = 12.71; paired t(557) = 10.591, p < .001, d = .449). Demographics Responses and attitude changes were not statistically linked to age (maximum Pearson’s R = |.13|) or ethnicity (all d’s < .13). All p’s > .10. Men reported expecting more ED th an women (368.45 (SD = 193.561) vs. 320.525 (SD = 191.090), d = .249; t(553) = 2.897, p < .004). Although this difference did reach significance, it was not significantly higher than the sex difference present in Sample 1 (d= .220; z = 0.16; p > .10.) Table 2. Correlations Among Expectancies for Cannabis-Induced Mystical Experiences, Antidepressant Effects, Dysfunctional Attitudes, and Use (N = 568) 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB ED .679** OBN .580** .702** DysAtt .144** .133** .128** Freq .351** .172** .119** -0.013 Avg High .432** .348** .351** 0.048 .404** Antidep .392** .245** .249** .194** .251** .249** **p < .01. EB = Emotional Breakthrough; ED = Ego Dissolution; OBN = Oceanic Boundlessness; DysAtt = Dysfunctional Attitudes; Freq = Cannabis Use Days per month; Avg High = Average high per session; Antidep = Improvement in depression Correlations Pearson’s correlations (Table 2) showed that subjective effects covaried with each other, expected changes in dysfunctional attitudes, and anticipated impact on depression. They also increased with cannabis involvement. Anticipated Antidepressant Effects Tests of regression assumptions confirmed normal distributions after we dropped 16 multivariate outliers based on Mahalonabis distances. Only EB and dysfunctional attitudes predicted antidepressant effects when all variables were included: Standardized Beta EB = 0.388, t = 7.188, R- squared change = 0.149; Standardized Beta dysfunctional attitudes = .156, t = 3.973 R- squared change = .020, p < .001; Standardized Beta OBN = 0.066, t = 1.172, R-squared change = .001 p > .10; Standardized Beta ED = -.087, R-squared change = 0.002, t = -1.399, p > .10). Cannabis Implications for Psychotherapy 22 DISCUSSION Links between cannabis consumption and depression remain varied. A high dose of cannabis can create subjective effects that parallel psilocybin’s subjective effects, which seem to precede improvements in depression in psilocybin-assisted therapy. Two samples of cannabis users reported expecting that an ideal dose of cannabis administered in a therapeutic setting could create subjective effects like those linked to psilocybin-related improvements. These results confirm previous work on cannabis-induced oceanic boundlessness (OBN; Earleywine et al., 2021). These new data reveal that users expect that an ideal dose administered in ways that parallel current psilocybin-assisted therapy will alter psychedelic experiences of multiple types, including oceanic boundlessness and emotional breakthroughs. In addition, users report that an ideal dose might alter dysfunctional attitudes—a key contributor to depression in cognitive models of the disorder (Cristea et al., 2015). Expected antidepressant effects correlated with expected cannabis-induced mystical experiences, EB, and changes in dysfunctional attitudes. The impact of expected mystical experiences on expected antidepressant effects was mediated by EB. Dysfunctional attitudes, however, remained significant with mystical experiences and EB in the equation. Apparently, users believe that a session of cannabis-assisted psychotherapy would improve depression through two paths: Emotional Breakthrough and dysfunctional attitudes. These results have implications for cannabis-assisted psychotherapy. Sessions akin to the psilocybin-assisted trials would require initial meetings to develop rapport with guides, ingesting cannabis in a therapeutic setting with a consistent focus on internal experience, and follow-ups for discussion of insights, altered cognitions, and new behaviors (see Johnson et al., 2019; Luoma et al., 2020). Standard treatments rarely emphasize Emotional Breakthrough or Mystical Experiences as mechanisms, but cognitive approaches often focus on dysfunctional attitudes. In a first study of this kind, the current data suggest that cannabis users anticipate that cannabis-assisted psychotherapy could not only elicit mystical and emotional experiences, but also improve maladaptive beliefs like, “I must be liked by everyone or it’s a disaster,” and “If I fail partially, I have failed completely,” etc. Users report that they believe that links between changes in dysfunctional attitudes and improvements in depression remain even when the effects of mystical experiences and emotional breakthroughs are considered. The case for a randomized clinical trial of cannabis-assisted psychotherapy seems stronger under these circumstances. These effects might be unique to cannabis and the psychedelics. Opiates and stimulants, for example, do not appear to create the relevant changes in mystical experiences (Griffiths et al., 2006; Lamas et al., 1994), and seem less likely to alter EB, dysfunctional attitudes, or symptoms of depression. Examinations of the discriminant validity of these subjective effects of other psychoactive substances could prove informative. Cannabis-assisted psychotherapy might seem unnecessary given successes with psilocybin or ayahuasca (Palhano-Fontes et al., 2019), but rates of treatment failure and the chance to reveal novel information about neurotransmitter functioning underscore the need for cannabis trials. Available treatments fall short because of low success rates and delayed onset of improvement (Cuijpers et al., 2020; Earleywine & De Leo, 2020). Cannabis treatment might have pharmacological advantages. A treatment that relies on the cannabinoid system rather than monoamines could provide insights into neurotransmitters and psychopathology (Cowen & Browning, 2015; Harmer et al., 2017; Nutt et al., 2007). Of course, other important contributors Cannabis, A Publication of the Research Society on Marijuana 23 (including the psychotherapy relationship and process) can improve outcomes as well (Cuijpers et al., 2020). These data require cautious interpretation. Given the range of cannabis consumption in this sample and the small number of studies that have examined psychedelic-like effects of the plant or its constituents, the accuracy of any single person’s prediction is unknown. We have asked participants to envision a cannabis- assisted session that might be unlike any that they have experienced. We also asked about an ideal dosage, which might vary dramatically across participants without an initial reaction to a test dosage. Generally, those who were more involved with cannabis reported that they anticipated greater psychedelic effects after use (see Tables 1 and 2). Few laboratory administration studies address links between any cannabis expectancies and actual responses, but work with alcohol suggests that experienced drinkers have expectancies and actual subjective changes align (Morean et al., 2013, 2015). Had participants reported that they doubted that cannabis could help create the relevant experiences, this line of research could end. But users envision a potential here that might be worthy of pursuit. Perceptions of efficacy of this treatment would likely vary with previous experience with depressive symptoms and various interventions, suggesting that future work would benefit from a thorough assessment of psychopathology and therapy experience. Extending this work to other problems responsive to psilocybin also seems reasonable. Cannabis users might expect improved cancer-related distress, post- traumatic stress disorder, and drug problems for relevant sessions, for example (Bogenschutz et al., 2015; Carhart-Harris et al., 2016; Garcia-Romeu et al., 2014; Griffiths et al., 2016; Johnson et al., 2017; Klavetter & Mogar, 1967; Kurland et al., 1972; MacLean et al., 2011; O’Reilly & Funk, 1964; Pahnke et al., 1970; Richards et al., 1977; Ross et al., 2016). Should comparable expectancies appear for cannabis-assisted treatments for these problems, perhaps cannabis can join the current psychedelic renaissance and become part of an assisted form of psychotherapy. REFERENCES Amrhein, V., Trafimow, D., & Greenland, S. (2019). Inferential statistics as descriptive statistics: There is no replication crisis if we don’t expect replication. The American Statistician, 73(sup1), 262–270. Barrett, F. S., Schlienz, N. J., Lembeck, N., Waqas, M., & Vandrey, R. (2018). “Hallucinations” following acute cannabis dosing: a case report and comparison to other hallucinogenic drugs. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 3(1), 85–93. Beevers, C. G., Strong, D. R., Meyer, B., Pilkonis, P. A., & Miller, I. W. (2007). Efficiently assessing negative cognition in depression: an item response theory analysis of the dysfunctional attitude scale. Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 199–209. Bogenschutz, M. P., Forcehimes, A. A., Pommy, J. A., Wilcox, C. E., Barbosa, P., & Strassman, R. J. (2015). Psilocybin- assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: A proof-of-concept study. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 29(3), 289–299. Bricker, J. B., Russo, J., Stein, M. B., Sherbourne, C., Craske, M., Schraufnagel, T. J., & Roy-Byrne, P. (2007). Does occasional cannabis use impact anxiety and depression treatment outcomes? Results from a randomized effectiveness trial. Depression and Anxiety, 24(6), 392–398. Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, M., Day, C. M. J. J., Rucker, J., Watts, R., Erritzoe, D. E., Kaelen, M., Giribaldi, B., Bloomfield, M., Pilling, S., Rickard, J. A., Forbes, B., Feilding, A., Taylor, D., Cannabis Implications for Psychotherapy 24 Curran, H. V., & Nutt, D. J. (2018). Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six- month follow-up. Psychopharmacology, 235(2), 399–408. Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, M., Rucker, J., Day, C. M. J., Erritzoe, D., Kaelen, M., Bloomfield, M., Rickard, J. A., Forbes, B., Feilding, A., Taylor, D., Pilling, S., Curran, V. H., & Nutt, D. J. (2016). Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(7), 619– 627. Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Bolstridge, M., Demetriou, L., Pannekoek, J. N., Wall, M. B., Tanner, M., Kaelen, M., McGonigle, J., Murphy, K., Leech, R., Curran, H. V., & Nutt, D. J. (2017). Psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression: FMRI-measured brain mechanisms. Scientific Reports, 7(1). Cowen, P. J., & Browning, M. (2015). What has serotonin to do with depression? World Psychiatry, 14(2), 158–160. Cristea, I. A., Huibers, M. J. H., David, D., Hollon, S. D., Andersson, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2015). The effects of cognitive behavior therapy for adult depression on dysfunctional thinking: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 62–71. Cuijpers, P. (2017). Four decades of outcome research on psychotherapies for adult depression: An overview of a series of meta-analyses. Canadian Psychology, 58(1), 7–19. Cuijpers, P., Noma, H., Karyotaki, E., Vinkers, C. H., Cipriani, A., & Furukawa, T. A. (2020). A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression. World Psychiatry, 19(1), 92–107. Curran, H. V., Nutt, D., & de Wit, H. (2018). Psychedelics and related drugs: therapeutic possibilities, mechanisms and regulation. Psychopharmacology, 235(2), 373–375. Dittrich, A. (1998). The standardized psychometric assessment of altered states of consciousness (ASCs) in humans. Pharmacopsychiatry, 31(SUPPL. 2), 80– 84. Earleywine, M., & De Leo, J. (2020). Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy for depression: How dire is the need? How could we do it? Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 4(2), 88–92. Earleywine, M., Ueno, L. F., Mian, M. N., & Altman, B. R. (2021). Cannabis-induced oceanic boundlessness. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 35(7), 841-847. Farmer, S., Slavin, M. N., Loflin, M. J. E., Luba, R., & Earleywine, M. (2019). Aversiveness and meaningfulness of uncomfortable experiences with edible cannabis. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 51(5), 413–420. Feingold, D., & Weinstein, A. (2021). Cannabis and depression. Cannabinoids and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, 67-80. Ferrara, M. S. (2016). Sacred bliss : a spiritual history of cannabis. Rowman & Littlefield. Ferrara, M. S. (2021). Peak-experience and the entheogenic use of cannabis in world religions. Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 4(3), 179-191. Garcia-Romeu, A., Davis, A. K., Erowid, F., Erowid, E., Griffiths, R. R., & Johnson, M. W. (2019). Cessation and reduction in alcohol consumption and misuse after psychedelic use. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 33(9), 1088–1101. Garcia-Romeu, A., Griffiths, R. R., & Johnson, M. W. (2014). Psilocybin- occasioned mystical experiences in the treatment of tobacco addiction. Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 7(3), 157–164. Gobbi, G., Atkin, T., Zytynski, T., Wang, S., Askari, S., Boruff, J., ... & Mayo, N. (2019). Association of cannabis use in adolescence and risk of depression, Cannabis, A Publication of the Research Society on Marijuana 25 anxiety, and suicidality in young adulthood: a systematic review and meta- analysis. JAMA psychiatry, 76(4), 426- 434. Gorfinkel, L. R., Stohl, M., & Hasin, D. (2020). Association of depression with past-month cannabis use among US adults aged 20 to 59 years, 2005 to 2016. JAMA network open, 3(8), e2013802-e2013802. Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Carducci, M. A., Umbricht, A., Richards, W. A., Richards, B. D., Cosimano, M. P., & Klinedinst, M. A. (2016). Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 30(12), 1181–1197. Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., McCann, U., & Jesse, R. (2006). Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology, 187(3), 268–283. Grinspoon, L., & Bakalar, J. (1997). Marihuana, the forbidden medicine. Yale University Press. Harmer, C. J., Duman, R. S., & Cowen, P. J. (2017). How do antidepressants work? New perspectives for refining future treatment approaches. The Lancet Psychiatry, 4(5), 409–418. Hser, Y.-I., Evans, E., Huang, D., & Anglin, D. M. (2004). Relationship between drug treatment services, retention, and outcomes. Psychiatric Services, 55(7), 767–774. Johnson, M., Garcia-Romeu, A., & Griffiths, R. R. (2017). Long-term follow-up of psilocybin-facilitated smoking cessation. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 43(1), 55–60. Johnson, M. W., Hendricks, P. S., Barrett, F. S., & Griffiths, R. R. (2019). Classic psychedelics: An integrative review of epidemiology, therapeutics, mystical experience, and brain network function. Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 197, 83– 102. Klavetter, R. E., & Mogar, R. E. (1967). Peak Experiences: Investigation of Their Relationship to Psychedelic Therapy and Self-Actualization. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 7(2), 171–177. Kosiba, J. D., Maisto, S. A., & Ditre, J. W. (2019). Patient-reported use of medical cannabis for pain, anxiety, and depression symptoms: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 233, 181–192. Kurland, A. A., Grof, S., Pahnke, W. N., & Goodman, L. E. (1972). Psychedelic drug assisted psychotherapy in patients with terminal cancer. Journal of Thanatology, 2(1–2), 644–691. Lamas, X., Farré, M., Llorente, M., & Camí, J. (1994). Spanish version of the 49-item short form of the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI). Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 35(3), 203–209. Lev-Ran, S., Roerecke, M., Le Foll, B., George, T. P., McKenzie, K., & Rehm, J. (2014). The association between cannabis use and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine, 44(4), 797–810. Liechti, M. E., Dolder, P. C., & Schmid, Y. (2017). Alterations of consciousness and mystical-type experiences after acute LSD in humans. Psychopharmacology, 234(9–10), 1499–1510. Luoma, J. B., Chwyl, C., Bathje, G. J., Davis, A. K., & Lancelotta, R. (2020). A meta- analysis of placebo-controlled trials of psychedelic-assisted therapy. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 52(4), 289–299. MacLean, K. A., Johnson, M. W., & Griffiths, R. R. (2011). Mystical experiences occasioned by the hallucinogen psilocybin lead to increases in the personality domain of openness. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 25(11), 1453–1461. Mathai, D. S., Meyer, M. J., Storch, E. A., & Kosten, T. R. (2020). The relationship between subjective effects induced by a Cannabis Implications for Psychotherapy 26 single dose of ketamine and treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 264, 123– 129. Morean, M. E., Corbin, W. R., & Treat, T. A. (2013). The subjective effects of alcohol scale: Development and psychometric evaluation of a novel assessment tool for measuring subjective response to alcohol. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 780– 795. Morean, M. E., Corbin, W. R., & Treat, T. A. (2015). Evaluating the accuracy of alcohol expectancies relative to subjective response to alcohol. Addictive Behaviors, 51, 197–203. Nour, M. M., Evans, L., Nutt, D., & Carhart- Harris, R. L. (2016). Ego-dissolution and psychedelics: Validation of the ego- dissolution inventory (EDI). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(269), 269. Nutt, D., Demyttenaere, K., Janka, Z., Aarre, T., Bourin, M., Canonico, P. L., Carrasco, J. L., & Stahl, S. (2007). The other face of depression, reduced positive affect: The role of catecholamines in causation and cure. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 21(5), 461–471. O’Reilly, P. O., & Funk, A. (1964). LSD in chronic alcoholism. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 91(3), 258–261. Osborne, J. W. (2013). Best practices in data cleaning. Sage. Pahnke, W. N., Kurland, A. A., Unger, S., Savage, C., Wolf, S., & Goodman, L. E. (1970). Psychedelic therapy (utilizing LSD) with cancer patients. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 3(1), 63–75. Palhano-Fontes, F., Barreto, D., Onias, H., Andrade, K. C., Novaes, M. M., Pessoa, J. A., Mota-Rolim, S. A., Osório, F. L., Sanches, R., Dos Santos, R. G., Tófoli, L. F., De Oliveira Silveira, G., Yonamine, M., Riba, J., Santos, F. R., Silva-Junior, A. A., Alchieri, J. C., Galvão-Coelho, N. L., Lobão-Soares, B., … Araújo, D. B. (2019). Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment- resistant depression: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Psychological Medicine, 49(4), 1–9. Richards, W. A., Rhead, J. C., Dileo, F. B., Yensen, R., & Kurland, A. A. (1977). The peak experience variable in DPT-assisted psychotherapy with cancer patients. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 9(1), 1–10. Roseman, L., Haijen, E., Idialu-Ikato, K., Kaelen, M., Watts, R., & Carhart-Harris, R. (2019). Emotional breakthrough and psychedelics: Validation of the Emotional Breakthrough Inventory. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 33(9), 1076–1087. Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., & Carhart-Harris, R. L. (2018). Quality of acute psychedelic experience predicts therapeutic efficacy of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 8(974). Ross, S., Bossis, A., Guss, J., Agin-Liebes, G., Malone, T., Cohen, B., Mennenga, S. E., Belser, A., Kalliontzi, K., Babb, J., Su, Z., Corby, P., & Schmidt, B. L. (2016). Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life- threatening cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 30(12), 1165–1180. Russo, E. B., & Marcu, J. (2017). Cannabis pharmacology: the usual suspects and a few promising leads. Advances in pharmacology, 80, 67–134. Schenberg, E. E. (2018). Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy: a paradigm shift in psychiatric research and development. Frontiers in pharmacology, 9(733). Uthaug, M. V., van Oorsouw, K., Kuypers, K. P. C., van Boxtel, M., Broers, N. J., Mason, N. L., Toennes, S. W., Riba, J., & Ramaekers, J. G. (2018). Sub-acute and long-term effects of ayahuasca on affect and cognitive thinking style and their association with ego dissolution. Cannabis, A Publication of the Research Society on Marijuana 27 Psychopharmacology, 235(10), 2979– 2989. Wang, C. Y., Zhang, K., & Zhang, M. (2017). Dysfunctional attitudes, learned helplessness, and coping styles among men with substance use disorders. Social Behavior and Personality, 45(2), 269–280. WHO. (2017). Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. World Health Organization, January 2017, 1–24. Yapan, S., Türkçapar, M. H., & Boysan, M. (2020). Rumination, automatic thoughts, dysfunctional attitudes, and thought suppression as transdiagnostic factors in depression and anxiety. Current Psychology, 1–17. Funding and Acknowledgements: The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript. The authors received no specific funding for this study. Special thanks to Matthew Butcher and Jardim das Flores for support during this work. Copyright: © 2022 Authors et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author and source are credited, the original sources is not modified, and the source is not used for commercial purposes.