































  :::::: 

171 

Extraction, Exploitation and Degradation: A Brief 
Environmental History of Western Investment in 

Jamaica 
Thomas McCarthy 

 
Tom McCarthy is pursuing a degree in History and Environmental Studies. He is 
interested in examining the intersections between people, their histories, and the 
environment, while attempting to form these into wider critiques of oppressive 
economic and social systems. In addition to his studies, he organizes with 
University of Toronto Environmental Action, a student group focused on climate 
justice for youth. Upon graduation, he's looking forward to political activism, 
hopefully some travel outside of North America, and eventually a return to post-
graduate studies. 
 
 Hurricanes are nothing new to Jamaicans; they have been a 
part of the seasons for as long as people have lived there. While they 
are often devastating and traumatic, people have always somehow 
managed to pick up the pieces, sweep up the damage, and move on 
with their lives. However, as severe weather events associated with 
climate change become more frequent and intense, and climatic 
conditions at large become less compatible with status quo 
environmental and agricultural practices, Jamaica is woefully 
unprepared to weather the storms of the 21st century. Due to a 
complex and interrelating set of historical factors, Jamaica’s natural 
defenses against severe weather have been consistently degraded and 
undermined in the name of profit and development. 
 

 From its start as a Spanish, then English colony, through 
centuries of slavery and sugarcane monoculture; to its twentieth-
century resource extraction and tourism-based economy, Jamaica’s 
people and natural assets have been exploited and abused to an 
enormous degree. However, through it all, persistent outside 
influences have limited and affected the choices available to the 
country’s leaders, particularly following independence. The same 
widespread practices and industries that have harmed Jamaica’s 
environment, like sugar, bananas, and bauxite, have been lucrative 
to those who controlled them. The work of economists like George 
Beckford supports the notion that the underdevelopment of Jamaica 
is a dynamic process stemming from the legacy of slavery and 
continuing through to the present. People and the environment often 
serve as a mirror to each other; what is beneficial for society in a 
collective and holistic sense tends to be good for the environment, 



THOMAS McCARTHY 
 EXTRACTION, EXPLOITATION, DEGREDATION 

 

172 

and vice versa. In the case of the Caribbean, as Anderson contends, 
“the ecosystem of all small islands has a turbulent history, the same 
turbulence to which environmental institutions help us adapt. As a 
result of these disruptions, the biological and social-cultural systems 
become intertwined.”1  

 
 By outlining the historical narrative of Jamaica’s 
development from an environmental perspective, it becomes clear 
how the very same economic ideology and practices that have 
contributed to poverty, exploitation, and strife in Jamaica today have 
degraded its natural systems to the point that life there may become 
untenable in decades to come barring significant change. The 
dominance of socially and environmentally-intensive practices and 
the outflow of resources and capital are fundamental features of all 
four of Jamaica’s major historical industries; sugar, bananas, 
bauxite, and tourism. 
 
 When Europeans first arrived in Jamaica, and indeed the 
Caribbean in general, they were taken aback at the natural beauty 
and abundance of the island and its surrounding seas. However, the 
reason they had stumbled upon these islands in the first place was 
because they had been dispatched by the courts of Europe to find a 
route to Asia, and in turn its goods and spices. They arrived seeking 
profit, and though they failed to find India, they were not 
disappointed with the wealth-generating potential of islands like 
Jamaica. Though the Spanish were the first to conquer Jamaica and 
through the enslavement of the indigenous population, exploit the 
region, it was the English who fully implemented and 
institutionalized a plantation economy in Jamaica following their 
capture of the island in 1655.  
 

As George Beckford and Michael Witter trace in Small 
Garden, Bitter Weed, when English settlers first brought high-
quality sugarcane from Barbados, they found that it thrived in 
Jamaican soil. However, sugarcane production, especially at a large 
scale, was very labour-intensive. At the same time, to pay 
Englishmen wages to perform this truly hard labour was not 

                                                           
1 Robert S. Anderson, “Gardens and Forests on Caribbean Islands: Two Hundred 

Years of Environmental Institutions,” in Islands, Forests and Gardens in the 

Caribbean: Conservation and Conflict in Environmental History.  Ed. Robert S. 

Anderson et al., (Oxford, Macmillan Education/Warwick University, 2006), 11. 



CARIBBEAN QUILT | 2013 
 

 

173 

economically feasible, or rather not optimal for maximum profits.2 
The English and other colonizing powers solved this problem by 
utilizing enslaved African to make their plantations profitable.  Early 
plantation owners were quick to capitalize on this opportunity.   

 
The establishment of the Royal Africa Company in the 1670s 

represents England’s entry as a major power in the Trans-Atlantic 
slave trade. Over the next two centuries, millions of Africans were 
captured and brought to Jamaica to work in the cane fields.3 As 
African peoples were dehumanized and oppressed, the sugarcane 
continued to grow in vast and expanding plantations. Other 
enterprising slave owners made investments in coffee, ginger, spices, 
and other valuable commodities, growing and slightly diversifying 
Jamaica’s plantation economy.  

 
As the cane was sowed, forests were felled, and swamps 

were drained and filled in. Canals for irrigation were dug, and 
streams were dammed. Large inland areas of Jamaica were 
transformed from rich, diverse tropical forest and grasslands to 
fields of uniform crops. Sugarcane itself is a very intensive plant to 
grow at large scale; each plant requires a large quantity of water and 
nutrients in order to grow. Like other high-calorie crops, if grown on 
the same plot of land for several years, the quality of the soil is 
greatly reduced. Additionally, the English planters who controlled 
and directed this agricultural development were unfamiliar with the 
environmental dynamics of tropical ecosystems. In apparent 
contradiction to the lush forests that grow on them, tropical soils are 
in fact fairly poor for growing crops, but when one thinks about these 
forests from a different perspective, it is clear that most of the 
nutrients lie in the vegetation above ground. The detritus of organic 
matter that covers the ground of any healthy forest is what provides 
the minerals and nutrients to plants, not the sandy soil underneath. 

  
When a forest is removed, this loose top layer of rich organic 

matter is easily and quickly eroded. Watts refers to the prevailing 

                                                           
2 George Beckford and Michael Witter, Small Garden, Bitter Weed (Morant Bay: 

Maroon Publishing House,1980), 17. 
3 ibid. 



THOMAS McCARTHY 
 EXTRACTION, EXPLOITATION, DEGREDATION 

 

174 

attitudes towards cane cultivation and land use as “dangerously 
simplistic views of the nature of cane land soils in the [Caribbean].”4  
Over time, as cane yields gradually declined, planters found ways to 
mitigate soil erosion and nutrient loss, such as an increase in manure 
fertilization, sourcing timber from South America rather than island 
forests to reduce erosion, and notably the practice of planting cane in 
depressed plots known as cane holes. 
 

 To give an impression of the human toll of this practice, 
Watts notes that slave gangs of about 50 members were commonly 
expected to excavate one acre of land roughly two meters deep on 
every day in the planting season, which amounts to an absurd 
amount of digging. Most of these practices had been innovated in the 
Windward and Leeward Islands, and came to use in Jamaica in the 
early to mid-1700s.5 Regardless of their effectiveness in mitigating 
environmental degradation, the nutrient-taxing nature of large-scale 
cane production remained the same, as did the requirement to cut 
down forests and import slaves to feed the hunger for increased 
profit. 
 As Europe’s demand for sugar grew, so did the size of the 
plantations. Planters who were unable to succeed were forced to sell 
their land to more profitable plantations, contributing to the rise of a 
class of extremely wealthy and powerful planters. However, as 
Beckford and Witter write, “The slave mode [of production] was 
totally dependent on the English market: it was supplied with inputs 
from English factories and in turn sold its output to English 
consumers ... thus the reproduction of slave society from year to year 
depended on its relations with English capitalism, [which] expanded 
on the surpluses thus extracted from slave production.”6 In 
conjunction, “from the end of the 17th century on, sugar production 
[in Jamaica] survived under the protection of tariffs levied on sugar 
produced outside the English colonial empire.”7 This is important to 
note, because of the nature of dependency it describes. As Jamaica 
progressed, the nature of this economically dependent relationship 
with powerful nations would change, but remain largely in place. 
Ultimately, the environmental legacy of the plantation economy in 

                                                           
4 David Watts, The West Indies: Patterns of Development, Cultural, and 

Environmental Change Since 1492. (Great Britain: Cambridge University Press, 

1987), 396.  
5 ibid. 
6 Beckford and Witter, Small Garden, Bitter Weed, 17. 
7 Beckford and Witter, Small Garden, Bitter Weed, 21. 



CARIBBEAN QUILT | 2013 
 

 

175 

Jamaica runs parallel to its social legacy: the natural environment 
was exploited to the largest degree possible consistent with sustained 
profits for the ruling class. Wealth and resources mostly flowed out 
of the country to England and throughout the empire, and what 
wealth remained was concentrated in the hands of the few at the 
expense of the many. 
 
 When slavery was formally abolished across the British 
Empire in 1838, it was mainly due to the fact that plantation 
economies where no longer profitable.  Resistance movements from 
enslaved populations, pressure from an ascendant industrial class 
who viewed plantations as inefficient and costly, (chafed at the cost 
of staple foodstuffs needed to feed their workers inflated by tariffs 
and subsidies for the colonies)and the abolitionist movements in 
British empire all contributed to emancipation. However, as 
Beckford and Witter point out, emancipation was hollow for many 
Jamaicans, who were forced to sell their labour for wages, often to 
their former masters. “The strategy was to formally emancipate the 
slaves but deny them real freedom by ensuring that the means of 
production, particularly land, remained in the hands of European 
capitalists.”8  
 
 However, as much as land use had been dominated by 
sugarcane cultivation, a peasant land base had developed alongside it 
to provide food and other important crops and services. Many 
former slaves were involved in this economy, but more rushed to join 
it following emancipation. It was a key to self-sufficiency, and with it, 
freedom. Those who could provide for themselves off of the land 
were able to avoid the predations of the plantation system. As Besson 
writes, “freed slaves, wherever they could, sought to obtain freehold 
land ... those who managed to obtain freehold land transformed this 
into family land to ensure freehold rights to all their descendants in 
perpetuity. As land was denied to the slave, so was kinship; and 
family land is also the basis on which kin groups or family lines are 
created and kinship maximized.”9 Although discussing Haiti, 
Laurent Dubois sheds some light on this mindset: “on these small 

                                                           
8 Beckford and Witter, Small Garden, Bitter Weed, 22. 
9 Jean Besson (1984): Land tenure in the free villages of Trelawny, Jamaica: A 

case study in the  

  Caribbean peasant response to emancipation, Slavery & Abolition: A Journal of 

Slave and Post-Slave  

  Studies, 5:1, 3-23 



THOMAS McCARTHY 
 EXTRACTION, EXPLOITATION, DEGREDATION 

 

176 

farms, [freed slaves] did all the things that had been denied to them 
under slavery: they built families, practiced their religion, and 
worked for themselves.”10  
 
 This type of agriculture led to a very different relationship 
between people and the land. These people depended on the land for 
not only subsistence, but for maintaining and protecting their 
autonomy, and such ties to the land naturally lead to a strong respect 
for it. To live off the land requires a deep understanding of the 
interrelating forces of nature, and an appreciation for the ecosystems 
that provide means for human survival.  
 

For roughly a century, these two economies existed 
alongside each other. As Beckford argues in Persistent Poverty, the 
plantation model continued to be a major organizational influence 
on the development of the Jamaican economy. However, an essential 
component to understanding the change in Jamaica’s development 
at the turn of the century lies in the development of wealthy 
countries. As Beckford writes, “By the 20th century economic 
maturity had arrived in the metropolitan countries, and business 
corporations there were ready for direct overseas investment.”11 
Essentially, having gorged itself on profits gained through centuries 
of exploitation and subjugation, the West had a surplus of capital 
and was looking for ways to invest and grow it.  

 
 An illustrative example of this in Jamaica is the case of the 
banana industry. As the global balance of power shifted from the 
British Empire to the United States of America, particularly in the 
areas claimed by the Monroe Doctrine, American corporations began 
to take interest in Jamaica. In the 19th century, bananas had been a 
household crop on many plots of family land. Bananas are nutritious, 
grow on a tree (thereby leaving space below for other crops), and are 
quite delicious. Technological changes like faster ships and 
refrigeration made it feasible to transport perishable goods from the 
tropics to markets in America and Europe, and tropical fruit 
production was seen as a profitable investment. The United Fruit 
Company of the United States came to Jamaica to capitalize on this. 
Beckford and Witter elaborate on this, arguing that the development 
of the Jamaican banana industry was crucial in several ways. It broke 

                                                           
10 Laurent Dubois, Haiti: The Aftershocks of History, (New York: Metropolitan 

Books, 2012), 6. 
11 George Beckford, Persistent Poverty, (Mona, Jamaica: UWI Press, 1972), 85. 



CARIBBEAN QUILT | 2013 
 

 

177 

the monopoly of sugar over the island’s economy and well-being, but 
simultaneously reinforced its ‘original export orientation.’12 
Additionally, it was much more amenable to small-scale production 
than sugar and far less labour-intensive, which allowed for peasants 
to actually make some revenue off their land. At first, this benefited 
the peasant economy, but as more and more took the opportunity to 
make money off of bananas, the large landowners and companies 
like United Fruit came to dominate much of Jamaica’s prime 
agricultural land. And like the plantation owners, their principal 
concern was profit. Beckford and Witter comment: “Together with 
sugar, banana production for export ... dominated the peasant 
sector, which was increasingly marginalized and made to function as 
its labour reserve.”13 People who thought they were getting a good 
deal selling their banana produce to the big companies and their 
middle-men soon realized they had been effectively corralled into a 
wage-based economy. Many at this time chose to emigrate, thereby 
selling their land to the highest bidder, who unsurprisingly would 
likely use the land to grow more bananas.  
 
 The most obvious environmental impact of this dominance 
is blanket monoculture: as huge swaths of the Jamaican countryside 
devoted to the cultivation of a single plant. Beyond the economic 
risks associated with over-reliance on few commodities, this had the 
impact of further harming and reducing biodiversity, which is 
absolutely essential for healthy and resilient ecosystems. Also, 
because bananas could be cultivated on hillsides, there was a push to 
deforest many inclined tracts of land that had previously been left 
relatively undisturbed. When heavy rains come, banana trees 
planted in uniform rows are no match for healthy forest in terms of 
preventing and mitigating erosion and gullying. Additionally, the 
banana industry had the affect of wresting many people from the 
peasant economy, which was the only sector of the economy that 
approached what is termed sustainable today. People who can 
provide for themselves, a lack of opportunity and resources aside, 
often have a far greater degree of autonomy than wage-earners, and 
are undoubtedly a less taxing and frequently beneficial presence for 
their local environments. Due to the various institutions that 
structure this dependent relationship to the land, they are invested 
in keeping it healthy and productive, and to do so means being 
attentive to and defensive of the small details that make ecosystems 

                                                           
12 George Beckford and Michael Witter, Small Garden, Bitter Weed, 50. 
13 George Beckford and Michael Witter, Small Garden, Bitter Weed, 51. 



THOMAS McCARTHY 
 EXTRACTION, EXPLOITATION, DEGREDATION 

 

178 

function; from pollinating insects that are integral to food 
production, to songbirds that keep pests at bay.  
 
 Today, fertilizers and pesticides are sprayed in large 
quantities on Jamaica’s remaining banana and cane field, which is 
associated with a host of terrestrial pollution concerns, but is 
particularly damaging to the coastal environment. As it runs off and 
flows into the ocean, fertilizers contribute to coral-smothering algae 
blooms, and pesticides and antibiotic effluents harm a wide range of 
species.  
 
 Additionally, Beckford and Witter mention how in times of 
scarcity, particularly when the global economy collapsed during the 
Great Depression, peasants were able to furnish organic consumer 
products from their natural surroundings, such as soap and cooking 
oil from coconuts, and flour from dried and ground cassava.14 Today 
people in rich countries pay top dollar for such organic products; 
they are undeniably more compatible with the goal of sustainability 
and are superior from a human health perspective to synthetic and 
mass-produced consumer products. With the banana trade came the 
beginnings of tourism, with a few entrepreneurs installing luxurious 
passenger quarters on their banana boats to ferry wealthy North 
Americans and Europeans to tropical getaways. As the consolidation, 
expansion, and dominance of the banana trade shows, “the basic 
pattern of socio-economic relations and institutions had already 
been determined by sugar.”15 By 1960, on the eve of independence, 
300 estates of over 500 acres occupied 40 percent of Jamaica’s 
arable land.16 While the twentieth century progressed, this overall 
trend would continue to define Jamaica’s economic development. 
  
 Following the Second World War, there was a massive 
demand for lightweight metals, most significantly, aluminum. This 
metal alloy was a cheap and durable building material, and was used 
for all sorts of postwar consumer products, from radios to toaster 
ovens, as well as being essential for the booming airplane industry. 
Aluminum is derived from the naturally occurring ore bauxite, of 
which Jamaica was once incredibly rich.  
 

                                                           
14 George Beckford and Michael Witter, Small Garden, Bitter Weed, 65. 
15 ibid. 
16 George Beckford, Persistent Poverty, 242. 



CARIBBEAN QUILT | 2013 
 

 

179 

 In 1962, Jamaica gained its independence from Great 
Britain. But, like emancipation over a century before, this failed to 
transform the exploitative and stratified organization of Jamaican 
society. Due to a lack of political imagination, the young country’s 
new leaders were faced with the dilemma of meeting social needs 
while maintaining positive economic growth. Because of the 
booming demand for aluminum, one of the first actions of the 
governing pro-market Jamaican Labour Party (JLP) was to allow 
heavy foreign investment in the country’s resource sector, taking 
cues from Puerto Rico’s ‘Operation Bootstrap.’ This came in the form 
of allowing five major multinational corporations to buy up nearly all 
of Jamaica’s bauxite resources; four American, and one Canadian.17 
Within five years, Jamaica was the world’s largest supplier of the ore, 
producing 21% of global supply.18 As Bradley notes, “Just as it had 
under colonial rule, a few top-ranking civil servants and company 
directors were doing very well, as were a rapidly increasing number 
of overseas-based multinational corporations, but other than that, 
this new money meant nothing except on paper.” Continuing their 
analysis, Beckford and Witter argue that despite diversification, 
“post-war developments reinforced the basic import-export 
orientation of the economy.”19  
 
 Bauxite mining was hugely degrading for inland Jamaica, 
particularly in the eastern mountains. As Coke, Weir, and Hill 
outline, “Impacts of mining and processing on environmental quality 
have been evident both in the long and short term. The landscape 
has been damaged, [and] valuable agricultural soils have been 
replaced by badly eroded skeletal soils capable of sustaining only 
grass production.”20  Clear-cutting a patch of forest and tearing up 
the earth beneath has completely destroyed whatever ecosystem 
once existed. But beyond denuding large tracts of rural Jamaica, the 
processing of the bauxite ore produces much pollution. And even 
though they are drastically inferior to native forest, monoculture 
banana tree farms are far better than a scraped-up moonscape in 
terms of preventing erosion. Jamaica has one of the world’s highest 

                                                           
17 George Beckford and Michael Witter, Small Garden, Bitter Weed, 67. 
18 Lloyd Bradley, Bass Culture: When Reggae Was King, (London: Penguin Books, 

2001), 263. 
19 George Beckford and Michael Witter, Small Garden, Bitter Weed, 66. 
20 Coke, Weir, and Hill, “Environmental Impact of Bauxite Mining and Processing 

in Jamaica,” Social and Economic Studies: 36 (1987) 289-333. 



THOMAS McCARTHY 
 EXTRACTION, EXPLOITATION, DEGREDATION 

 

180 

rates of deforestation.21 For a nation that experiences heavy rains 
seasonally, this is highly problematic. Any pollution left in the soil is 
carried off by erosion into both streams and groundwater used for 
drinking supplies. Although it provided the country with breakneck  
7% annual GDP growth for a period and helped address 
unemployment, nearly all of that wealth flowed out of the country 
and into the accounts of the five major multinationals that had been 
allowed to dominate the industry. By the time Michael Manley’s 
People’s National Party was prepared to implement reforms that 
would keep some of the revenue in Jamaica in the mid-1970s, much 
of the island’s bauxite had already been extracted.22  
 
   The exploitation of bauxite resources occurred 
simultaneously with the explosion of the tourism industry. In the 
midst of post-war North America’s towering affluence, 
unprecedented numbers of everyday people could afford to spend a 
week or two on a beach in the Caribbean. As in many neighbouring 
countries, tourism has become a fundamental sector of Jamaica’s 
economy, bringing in an estimated $944 billion in revenue in 
2008.23 However, this has had extremely significant impacts on the 
island’s natural defenses against severe weather.  
 
 Natural features such as coral reefs, wetlands, salt ponds, 
hillside forests, and mangrove swamps are essential to sustainable 
human settlement in Jamaica. Coral reefs and mangrove forests 
provide a barrier against strong waves and storm surge; wetlands 
soak up and filter torrential rains while hillside vegetation holds the 
soil firm and prevents mudslides. Moreover, these ecosystems 
provide essential services for people who rely on the land and sea-- 
for example, the same reefs, mangroves, and wetlands that protect 
the island from storms provide necessary habitats for fish 
reproduction, which local fisherman in turn rely on to feed 
themselves and make a living.  
 

                                                           
21 Tony Weis, “Beyond peasant deforestation: environment and development in 

rural Jamaica,” Global Environmental Change: 10(2000) 4, 299-305. 
22 William Jesse Biddle and John D. Stephens, “Dependent Development and 

Foreign Policy: The Case of Jamaica,” International Studies Quarterly: 33 (1989) 

4, 411-434. 
23 “Vision 2030 Jamaica: Tourism Sector Plan, 2009-2030,” Tourism Task Force, 

Gov’t. of Jamaica, 2009.  



CARIBBEAN QUILT | 2013 
 

 

181 

 However, coral reefs, wetlands, and mangroves are not what 
the tourists come to see. The popular imagination of the Caribbean 
in the West is of palm trees and cocktails with miniature umbrellas 
on pristine white beaches that stretch out endlessly over a sandy, 
turquoise sea. It’s what office workers in cold, wintery climes like 
Minneapolis and Toronto save up for months to visit, and what 
wealthy people across North America and Europe are accustomed to. 
Unfortunately, while this type of setting exists naturally in many 
parts of Jamaica, in many others, coral reefs abound. Corals may be 
vibrant and colourful when filmed with an underwater HD camera, 
but from the shore they look like dark grey patches interrupting the 
turquoise expanse. Additionally, they are full of sharp corals and all 
sorts of creatures that do not take kindly to being molested or 
stepped on by unsuspecting tourists, like lobsters, or sea urchins. 
Therefore, hotel developers are keen to get rid of them. Additionally, 
a combination of poverty and greed has led some shortsighted 
fishermen to use dynamite to increase their catches.24  
 
 Although Jamaica has land-use laws comparable to many 
other countries based on the British legal system, hotel developers 
often operate under lax regulatory oversight and foster 
environmentally degrading and socially exclusive zones along much 
of Jamaica’s coast. In Last Resorts: The Cost of Tourism in the 
Caribbean, Polly Pattullo characterizes the negative environmental 
context of hotel development and tourism as the region’s second 
invasion of ‘land-snatchers’: “...in the past half-century, it has been 
the coastline which has been cleared- for however much the 
Europeans admired the Caribbean paradise, they could not resist 
claiming it and ‘improving’ it.”25 While this may sound strident, it is 
no overstatement. Places that had once been used by local fisherman 
and which hosted crucial nesting and hatchery sites for fish, birds, 
and reptiles have been wholly transformed to meet the demands of 
tourism. As Jerome plainly states, “Small, ecologically fragile islands 
have restructured their colonial export staple economies towards 

                                                           
24 Thomas J. Goreau, “Coral Reef Protection in Western Jamaica,” Protecting 

Jamaica's Coral Reefs:  

   Water Quality Issues, 1992, 39-65. 
25 Polly Pattullo, Last Resorts: the Cost of Tourism in the Caribbean, (London, 

Latin America Bureau,  

    2005),130. 



THOMAS McCARTHY 
 EXTRACTION, EXPLOITATION, DEGREDATION 

 

182 

tourism by establishing transformational infrastructure and large-
scale resort complexes along delicate coastlines.”26  
 
 Pattullo minces no words when discussing how countries, 
like Jamaica, are “locked into a chain of tourist development where 
short-term gain takes precedence over long-term protection.”27 Take 
the town of Ocho Rios. The name means ‘Eight Rivers,’ so naturally 
one would expect marshes and wetlands close to where these eight 
rivers meet the sea. However, because of the pressures of tourism 
development, much of these endemic wetlands have been drained, 
filled in, and built upon. For example, 40 acres of wetlands were 
recently turned into a 4,000 bed resort complete with a cruise ship 
pier.28 Long channels of coastal sea floor must be dredged to 
accommodate large cruise ships, which in turn pollute the water with 
their exhaust and waste. Developers cut down stands of coastal palm 
trees to improve the view from hotel rooms only to find that the 
beach erodes even faster without roots holding the sand together. In 
turn, the sand is drawn out by the tides, and chokes already 
beleaguered coral reef and sea grass ecosystems. In order to furnish 
tailor-made resort environments, sand from less developed areas is 
mined in large quantities and transported elsewhere. Considering 
that due to a host of factors stemming from human action an 
estimated 90 percent of coral reefs worldwide are damaged, it is 
essential that remaining reefs be safeguarded if humans are to 
continue to benefit from them.29  
 

Socially, the tourism industry has had a largely negative 
impact on working-class Jamaicans, who are left with little option 
but to find jobs in hotels, as tour-guides, or as other ancillary 
participants in the tourism economy.  Using the justification that 
their resorts are all inclusive, many resorts are closed off to ordinary 
Jamaicans, who are charged exorbitant prices to walk along and 
make use of the beaches where they once caught crabs as children or 
stored their boats during hurricane season.30 Altogether, tourism has 
been environmentally and socially degrading to Jamaica, and while it 

                                                           
26 McElroy Jerome, Island Tourism: A Development Strategy for Biodiversity, 

INSULA Magazine, 2001. 
27 Polly Pattullo, Last Resorts: the Cost of Tourism in the Caribbean, 132. 
28 Polly Pattullo, Last Resorts: the Cost of Tourism in the Caribbean, 131. 
29 ibid.  
30 Marie Dixon Frisch, “Victory at Pear Tree Bottom,” Greening Politics: 33 

(2007) 1. 



CARIBBEAN QUILT | 2013 
 

 

183 

differs significantly from sugarcane, bananas, and bauxite, most of 
the revenue still flows to foreign bank accounts.  

 
 One decade into the 21st century, these four major 
industries have left Jamaica with a fragile, tenuous, and heavily 
damaged environment. Much of the island’s natural defenses against 
severe weather have been destroyed or greatly reduced. Additonally, 
Jamaica is situated in one of the most hurricane-prone places in the 
world. People recall storms like 1988‘s Hurricane Gilbert, 
remembered in the famous Lovindeer song ‘Wild Gilbert,’ with a mix 
of resignation and apprehension. It was the second most powerful 
hurricane ever recorded in the western hemisphere, and left 45 dead 
and 400,000 homeless over the next several weeks, and caused 
heavy damage to an estimated 20% of structures on the island.31 32 As 
the climate heats up, the warm-water conditions which create and 
fuel hurricanes are going to become increasingly powerful. 
Jamaicans can expect for storms like Gilbert, which have always 
been once-in-a-generation events, to occur with a steadily increasing 
severity and frequency barring massive, global action to halt climate 
change. It is especially cruel that countries like the United States, 
Canada, and Great Britain, who have plundered Jamaica for 
centuries and benefitted so much from its exploitation, are the ones 
most directly responsible for the carbon emissions driving climate 
change. All this paints an incredibly bleak environmental future for 
Jamaica, which must urgently reform the way it allows foreign 
businesses to operate on its territory, start massive efforts to reverse 
environmental damage and allow ecosystems to heal, and begin to 
make the sweeping adaptations required to help its people weather 
the intensified storms of the 21st century. 

                                                           
31 Lovindeer, Wild Gilbert, 1988. 
32 Philip R. Berke and Timothy Beatley, After The Hurricane (Baltimore: Johns 

Hopinks Press, 1988), 55. 


