




































 

66 
 

Debt and Destruction: The Global Abuse of Haiti and Unbalancing the Myth 

of Benevolent Canada 
Sabrina Uwase 

 

An integral responsibility of nation-states is to provide protection and the means for attaining a 

fulfilling life to those it governs. Given the fact that most current global powers were not founded 

with the needs of racialized peoples in mind, one is infuriated but not surprised, at the cyclical 

pattern of disregard and exploitation that people of colour in the Americas experience. Indigenous 

and Black communities in the Americas are not just disregarded by the state, but are actively 

targeted for exploitation and undermining. Analyzing Haiti’s post-colonial history and Canada’s 

domestic and international mining operations, I argue that nations in the Caribbean and Latin 

America have been extensively exploited economically by imperial powers, and their survival 

undermined by colonial legacies. Numerous countries in the region, to varying degrees, continue 

to experience the wrath of state-sponsored white supremacy and crippling debt that prevent 

authentic development. I advance the position that coerced debt and resource extraction have been 

weaponized against already ostracized communities by behemoth states that employ the myth of 

being a post-racial democracy. This paper also highlights a complex set of global relationships by 

linking extraction, state-corporate relations, and North-South divides, with a focus on Canadian 

mining in Latin America. 

When revolutions are discussed, people are often familiar only with the American, French, 

or Russian ones. In efforts to make the incredible feat of the Haitian Revolution an exception and 

not the norm, the nation has been physically, politically, and economically violated by imperial 

powers. This whitewashing of history leaves little room for the acknowledgement and celebration 

of non-white actors having a claim to what counts as important. From its inception, Haiti has been 

the source of inspiration for various slave rebellions while simultaneously sparking the first embers 

for the global fight for Black liberation. Two years prior to the beginning of the Haitian Revolution, 

France published its Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen in 1789. Although considered 

forward thinking for the period, contemporary readers will note that it only applied to white 

property-owning men. Nevertheless, the notion that all men were born “free and equal in rights” 

would go on to inspire oppressed peoples in Haiti to claim it. 

Despite Haiti appearing to be self-governing on paper, there exist external actors who exert 

considerable power over the state, undermining its sovereignty. I maintain that Haiti has not fully 

decolonized itself from the economic and political control of current imperial powers like the US 

and Canada. For several decades after Haiti had fought for its independence, world powers refused 

to officially recognize it as a sovereign state (Trouillot 47). While most other nations are applauded 

for gaining their independence, Haiti was largely punished by both Europe and its immediate 

neighbors in the region. Examples of this include the US cutting diplomatic ties after its 

independence, the prevention of Haitians leaving the island in efforts to stop the exportation of 

radical thought, and the numerous economic embargoes that were overwhelming for the newly 

founded republic (Fuertes 296). In an action that one can only describe as economic terrorism, 

France pressured Haiti into agreeing to pay 150 million francs in 1825, as retribution for the “loss” 

of French interests in exchange for recognizing their independence (Fuertes 296). In 1838, France 

decreased the debt to 90 million francs. With current inflation accounted for, 90 million francs 

today is upwards of 21 billion US dollars that Haiti had to pay for debt that can be reasonably 



Sabrina Uwase 
Debt and Destruction 

67 
 

regarded as illegitimate (Sommers 2015). Haiti being barred from engaging in regional economic 

trade while being expected to repay such a ludicrous debt is a mindboggling situation. It was in 

this period that Haiti’s independence was used against it to continue the long history of financial 

exploitation on the island by imperial powers.   

The informal recolonization of Haiti has largely been made possible by debt, “aid,” and 

North American foreign policy. The US historically did not recognize Haiti’s independence for 

decades and currently does not seem to respect its legitimacy as a self-governing state. Even before 

the birth of Haiti as a free republic, US President Andrew Johnson had hopes of seizing the whole 

island (Hidalgo 56).  Soon after, in 1910, US President William Taft provided Haiti with an 

interest-heavy loan to help pay its debt (U.S. Department of State). Failure to repay this new debt 

in 1914, led to the US moving much of Haiti’s money to the US with the rationale of “stabilizing” 

Haiti’s economy (U.S. Department of State). When Haitians understandably expressed disdain for 

their suffering through demonstrations, the US responded by occupying the nation for 19 years 

(Scott 35). The US has coached and selected numerous Haitian leaders, and exiled those who fail 

to advance its agenda. It is difficult for many to make sense of the turmoil in Haiti because the 

detriment has been very incremental. Constant intervention and external meddling in Haiti have 

robbed the nation and its people the right to self-govern. Wealth, whether through resource 

extraction or labour, continues to be endlessly depleted from Haiti, to benefit the insatiable hunger 

of Global North countries. 

The blatant mistreatment of underprivileged nations has transformed into the more 

insidious practice of “spreading democracy” or encouraging “economic development.” Explicit 

enslavement has been substituted with a combination of the following: exploitation of a cheap 

labour force, implementation of regimes or leaders loyal to imperial interest, and interest-heavy 

conditional loans. Debt has been primarily used for the underdevelopment of already struggling 

economies for the benefit of behemoth states like the US. The Caribbean and Latin America have 

both been imperilled by financial colonialism—primarily through high-interest conditional loans. 

Currently, one could make the claim that not one nation in the Caribbean has complete economic 

autonomy.  As Norman Girvan once said, nations in the Caribbean are “in-dependence” rather than 

independent (Girvan 22). “In-dependence.” meaning that the success or failure of Caribbean 

political economies is closely linked to the foreign policy goals of global powers. It can be argued 

that colonial patterns of trade are still being utilized in Haiti at present. Former plantation-based 

economies, which account for much of the Caribbean, have been strong-armed into continuing the 

pattern of basing much of their economy on natural resource extraction. With little diversification 

of their economies, Caribbean nations fall into the colonial tradition of capital being too 

concentrated in one sector, which leads to unequal structures in a nation’s economy (Myint 318).    

 Contrary to popular belief, the primary goal of developmental theories and models 

produced by Western states is not to alleviate poverty but to provide large economies access to 

vulnerable markets. Despite global financial organizations like the World Bank and International 

Monetary Fund striving to appear independent on paper, they implicitly and explicitly advance the 

foreign policy goals of established economies—primarily those of the United States, Canada, and 

European states. Many developmental theories can be described as removed because they do not 

adequately acknowledge the colonial histories that funded the development of numerous global 

powers at the expense of racialized peoples (Vanden 157). Numerous states that are categorized 

as underdeveloped have been deprived of a clean slate that independence promises, due to the 

entrenchment of colonial legacies within cornerstone institutions. Colonial legacies have made 



Caribbean Quilt ǀ 2020 

68 
 

their presence known primarily through socio-economic and political barriers that benefit former 

colonial and current imperial powers. Since first encounter, the Caribbean and Latin America have 

largely been viewed by colonizers and white settlers alike as a place to endlessly exploit for capital, 

regardless of social suffering or environmental consequences.  

Especially in the Latin America, there exist a widely-employed myth that extraction will 

advance the economic development of resource-rich impoverished nations (Burchart 469). Within 

much of the scholarship linking extraction with development, there seems to be a dangerous silence 

regarding the gross human suffering and environmental destruction that is caused in the hamster-

wheel pursuit of development. I maintain that the widespread existence of neoliberal market 

policies in the Caribbean and Latin America should be described as economic terrorism. In efforts 

to prevent market crashes concocted by imperial powers, nations in the region are coerced into 

accepting interest-heavy loans that are extremely difficult for nations already in debt to repay. To 

make matters worse, conditional loans usually require nations to reduce public spending and 

privatize pillar institutions like education, healthcare, and electricity, which devastate working 

class people (Easterly 4). 

In efforts to acknowledge that the governments and people who are most affected have a 

degree of self-determination, one must interrogate the part that Caribbean and Latin American 

actors play in facilitating foreign exploitation. I maintain that these countries are not actively 

welcoming foreign intervention, but instead are strong-armed into implementing neoliberal 

economic policies that have social and environmental consequences. Using the pretext of 

development, leaders in Latin America have often argued that extractive projects are necessary to 

fund the well-being of society. Using the former to justify the latter, corporations and state actors 

use the pursuit of development to advance particular interests that devastate the most defenceless 

members of the societies affected. This trading-in of environmental protection and the well-being 

of people for the pursuit of wealth is labelled by Peter Dauvergne as “shadows of consumption.” 

In his description of “shadows of consumption,” Dauvergne emphasizes the overlooked and 

concealed dangers of excessive extraction and its effects on people, wildlife, and the environment 

(Dauvergne 3). 

Nations and multibillion-dollar conglomerates can be described to be working together to 

gain highly profitable extractive contracts. A fact that surprises many is that Canada is one of the 

largest mining countries in the world. Outside of continental North America, much of Canada’s 

mining is done in numerous Latin American countries (Gordon 278). One could describe Canada’s 

state-corporate interests in Latin America as economic colonialism. Barrick Gold, founded by 

Peter Munk, is continuously regarded as the leader in gold mining. The list of environmental, 

sexual, and labour violations done in efforts to increase Barrick Gold’s profits is ever-growing 

(Holterman 60). Munk’s humanitarian legacy has been bought and paid for with stolen wealth. 

Munk’s donations cannot be removed from their roots in Indigenous land dispossession, labour 

exploitation, sexual violence, and environmental violence. The propaganda-like optics of Canada 

being portrayed as gentle and benevolent is extremely dangerous because it conceals and excuses 

state-sponsored violence as exceptionalities instead of the norm that it is.  

Coining the term “present absence,” Andrea Smith advances the view that there is a 

historical and contemporary erasure of Indigenous peoples and cultures from North American 

public discourse (70). Indigenous communities in Canada have not only experienced genocide and 

subjugation by white settlers historically, but continue to resist attacks against their histories, land, 



Sabrina Uwase 
Debt and Destruction 

69 
 

languages, and culture. Ann Stoler writes that “racism does not merely arise in moments of crisis, 

in sporadic cleansings. It is internal to the biopolitical state, woven into the web of the social body, 

threaded through its fabric” (Stoler 172). With former Prime Minster Stephen Harper’s apology 

for Canadian residential schools in 2006 and the creation of the Truth and Reconciliation 

Commission one cannot help but skeptically question whether these steps have been taken 

genuinely or for optics’ sake. Apologies should not be considered an exoneration of Canada’s past 

crimes, because the state continues to engage in policies and business ventures that disregard and 

harm Indigenous communities both at home and abroad. The myth of a utopian and multicultural 

society in Canada drives the state further into neoliberal territory. This endorses a narrative of 

acceptance, thus undermining local and national pressures to tackle our colonial history and 

present. 

The irony is not lost on some that Canada and the US claim to be beacons for freedom and 

democracy yet infringe on the right for sovereign nations to self-govern without external influence. 

Haiti was the first blow in breaking the chain of the enslavement of Black people. This 

reorganizing of the status quo was detrimental to economies that were heavily dependent on 

enslaved labour. Because of this, imperial powers tried profusely to destabilize the first Black 

Republic to deter others from pursuing the same means. Haiti’s initial independence showed that 

physical decolonization was a possibility. Primarily through debt and resource extraction, imperial 

nations have succeeded in economically colonizing politically independent states in the Caribbean 

and Latin America. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Caribbean Quilt ǀ 2020 

70 
 

Works Cited 

Burchardt, Hans-Jürgen, and Kristina Dietz. "(Neo-) Extractivism–A New Challenge for 

Development Theory from Latin America." Third World Quarterly 35, no. 3, 2014, p. 469. 

Dauvergne, Peter. “Introduction: The Ecological Shadows of Rising Consumption. Chapter 2: 

Dying of Consumption.” The Shadows of Consumption: Consequences for the Global 

Environment, MIT Press. 2010. pp. 1-32.  

 

Easterly, William. "What Did Structural Adjustment Adjust?: The Association of Policies and 

Growth with Repeated IMF and World Bank Adjustment Loans." Journal of Development 

Economics 76, no. 1, 2005, pp. 1-22. 

Fuertes, Digna Castañeda. "The Haitian Revolution: Legacy and Actuality." International 

Journal of Cuban Studies. 2010. p. 296. 

Gordon, Todd and Jeffrey R. Webber. Blood of Extraction: Canadian Imperialism in Latin 

America. Fernwood Publishing, 2016. p. 278.  

Hidalgo, Dennis. "Charles Sumner and the Annexation of the Dominican 

Republic." Itinerario 21, no. 2, 1997. p. 56. 

Holterman, Devin. "Slow Violence, Extraction and Human Rights Defence in Tanzania: Notes 

from the field." Resources Policy 40, 2014, pp. 59-65. 

Myint, Hla. "The "classical theory" of international trade and the underdeveloped countries." The 

Economic Journal 68, no. 270, 1958, p. 318. 

Scott, Helen. "200 years of US Imperialism: Haiti Under Siege." International Socialist 

Review 35, 2004. 

 

Smith, Andrea. “Not an Indian Tradition: The Sexual Colonization of Indigenous 

Peoples”. Hypatia, v. 18. i. 2, 2003, pp. 70-85. 

 

Sommers, Jeffrey. Race, Reality, and Realpolitik: U.S.-Haiti Relations in the Lead Up to the 

1915 Occupation. 2015. p. 124. 

 

Stoler, Ann. Race and the Education of Desire. Duke University Press, 1997, p. 172. 

 

Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. "Haiti’s Nightmare and the Lessons of History." NACLA Report on the 

Americas 27, no. 4, 1994, pp. 46-51. 

U.S. Government. "U.S. Invasion and Occupation of Haiti, 1915-34." U.S. Department of State. 

Accessed March 8, 2019. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/wwi/88275.htm. 

Vanden, Harry E. and Gary Prevost. “The Political Economy of Latin America” in, Politics of 

Latin America: The Power Game (Sixth Ed). 2017, pp. 157-191. 

https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/wwi/88275.htm


Sabrina Uwase 
Debt and Destruction 

71 
 

Weyland, Kurt. 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, 

Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton University Press, 2002.  

 


