Caryologia. International Journal of Cytology, Cytosystematics and Cytogenetics 74(2): 37-44, 2021

Firenze University Press 
www.fupress.com/caryologia

ISSN 0008-7114 (print) | ISSN 2165-5391 (online) | DOI: 10.36253/caryologia-1206

Caryologia
International Journal of Cytology,  

Cytosystematics and Cytogenetics

Citation: Teresa Garnatje,a, Jaume 
Pellicer,a, Joan Vallès, Nathan Hall, 
Curtis Hansen, Leslie Goertzen (2021) First 
genome size assessments for Marshal-
lia and Balduina (Asteraceae, Helenie-
ae) reveal significant cytotype diversity. 
Caryologia 74(2): 37-44. doi: 10.36253/
caryologia-1206

Received: February 02, 2021

Accepted: July 14, 2021

Published: October 08, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Teresa Garnatje,a, 
Jaume Pellicer,a, Joan Vallès, Nathan 
Hall, Curtis Hansen, Leslie Goertzen. 
This is an open access, peer-reviewed 
article published by Firenze University 
Press (http://www.fupress.com/caryo-
logia) and distributed under the terms 
of the Creative Commons Attribution 
License, which permits unrestricted 
use, distribution, and reproduction 
in any medium, provided the original 
author and source are credited.

Data Availability Statement: All rel-
evant data are within the paper and its 
Supporting Information files.

Competing Interests: The Author(s) 
declare(s) no conflict of interest.

ORCID
TG: 0000-0001-6295-6217
JP: 0000-0001-7632-9775
JV: 0000-0002-1309-3942 

First genome size assessments for Marshallia 
and Balduina (Asteraceae, Helenieae) reveal 
significant cytotype diversity

Teresa Garnatje1,a, Jaume Pellicer1,2,a,*, Joan Vallès3, Nathan Hall4, 
Curtis Hansen4, Leslie Goertzen4

1 Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-Ajuntament de Barcelona). Passeig del Migdia 
s.n. 08038 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
2 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, TW9 3AB, United Kingdom
3 Laboratori de Botànica - Unitat associada al CSIC. Facultat de Farmàcia i Ciències de 
l’Alimentació, Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat IRBio, Universitat de Barcelona. Av. 
Joan XXIII 27-31, 08028 Barcelona
4 Department of Biological Sciences and Auburn University Museum of Natural History, 
Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.A.
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jaume.pellicer@ibb.csic.es 
a both authors contributed equally

Abstract. The genus Marshallia is made up by seven to ten species of perennial herbs 
growing mainly in open habitats, whereas the genus Balduina is represented by three 
sympatric species; two perennial herbs and one annual, growing in open pine forest 
habitats. Both genera belong to the family Asteraceae, tribe Helenieae, and are endemic 
to the southeast United States, in North America. Cytogenetic studies concerning these 
two genera are scarce and genome size data is lacking for both. The main goals of this 
study were to (i) generate novel insights into the evolution of the genome size and (ii), 
contribute to filling existing gaps on our knowledge of the Asteraceae family from this 
point of view. Nuclear DNA contents range from 11.42 pg/2C in Marshallia trinervia to 
31.58 pg/2C in Marshallia mohrii. The combination of genome size with chromosome 
data (and inferred cytotypes) suggests the existence of multiple cytotypes, and provides 
interesting insights into the potential impact of polyploidy in the evolution of these 
genera in general, and the shaping of genome size diversity, in particular.

Keywords: Barbara’s buttons, chromosome counts, Compositae, nuclear DNA content, 
karyology, polyploidy.

INTRODUCTION

The genus Marshallia Schreb. (Asteraceae: Helenieae), commonly known 
as Barbara’s buttons, is endemic to the southeast United States of America 
(Hansen and Goertzen 2014). This small genus is made up of seven (Baldwin 
2009; Watson 2006) to ten species (Weakley 2020) of perennial herbs, which 
grow mainly in open habitats such as pine forests and roadsides, although 



38 Teresa Garnatje et al.

some species show preference for wet habitats as bogs, 
shoals or stream sides. 

Morphologically, the genus is characterized by pos-
sessing discoid inf lorescence heads of deeply lobed, 
rotate corollas that are colored either white or pink. 
Some of its morphological features are shared with other 
groups of Asteraceae (Baldwin 2009). This author placed 
the genus within subtribe Marshalliinae, closely related 
to Gaillardiinae (which includes Balduina Nutt., Gail-
lardia Foug., and Helenium L.) in the tribe Helenieae, 
but its sister group has not yet been clearly established 
(Baldwin and Wessa 2000). Although species of Mar-
shallia can be difficult to distinguish from each other 
based on morphological characters, a more recent study 
carried out by Hansen and Goertzen (2014) revealed that 
nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences serve as an acceptable 
DNA barcode marker in the genus, with sufficient nucle-
otide differences to discriminate amongst most species. 

The genus Balduina Nutt. is endemic to the south-
east United States, and it is represented by just three 
sympatric species, two perennial herbs and one annual 
(Keener 2006). Parker and Jones (1975) putatively related 
this genus to the tribe Helenieae based on an analysis of 
flavonoid and sesquiterpene lactone composition. 

Genome size (GS, usually estimated as the 2C-val-
ue), refers to the total amount of DNA in an unreplicat-
ed somatic nucleus (i.e. holoploid genome size, Greilhu-
ber et al. 2005). This parameter is considered as a bio-
diversity trait given the 2,400-fold variation encountered 
among land plants (Pellicer et al. 2018), with representa-
tives having some of the largest eukaryotic genomes so 
far reported (c. 300 Gbp/2C) in contrasting lineages such 
as the monocots and pteridophytes (Hidalgo et al. 2017). 
Certainly, the relevance of this parameter in the evolu-
tion of plants is without doubt and further supported by 
the multiple correlations reported between GS and sev-
eral ecological, life cycle and karyological attributes (e.g. 
Bennett and Leitch 2005; Beaulieu et al. 2008; Knight 
and Ackerly 2002; Pellicer et al. 2010a; Pustahija et al. 
2013; Pellicer et al. 2014). 

Genome size diversity and evolution studies in the 
Asteraceae have been examined by several authors (e.g. 
Vallès et al. 2013, Vitales et al. 2019). However, achiev-
ing a comprehensive understanding of GS evolution in 
a family as large as the Asteraceae (c. 25.000 species) is 
challenging. In fact, only about 6% of the extant taxo-
nomic diversity at the species level in this family has 
been studied from this point of view (Vitales et al. 2019). 
Despite the gaps in our knowledge, those studies have 
evidenced a relative high diversity of GS across species, 
ranging about 139-fold, mostly driven by the ubiquitous 
nature of polyploidy across the family. Indeed, the lack 

of correlation between GS and chromosome number 
among diploids suggests that chromosomal rearrange-
ments have a relatively minor impact on the overall 
DNA content at the family level (Vitales et al. 2019).

Although some species of Marshallia have recently 
been the subject of studies of nuclear gene regulation 
in non-model systems (Melton et al. 2019), and also of 
conservation biology (Knapp et al. 2020), cytogenetic 
studies concerning Marshallia or Balduina are very 
scarce and mostly restricted to chromosome counts. So 
far GS data are entirely absent for both genera accord-
ing to the Plant C-values Database (https://cvalues.sci-
ence.kew.org, Pellicer and Leitch 2020) as well as the 
family-specific Asteraceae Genome size database (htt-
ps://www.asteraceaegenomesize.com, Vitales et al. 2019). 
For that reason, the main goal of this study was to pro-
vide new GS and chromosome data for most species of 
these genera, aiming at (i) generating novel insights into 
the evolution of this parameter and (ii) contributing to 
filling existing gaps on our knowledge of Asteraceae 
genome size evolution. 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material

The species and populations studied as well as their 
origin and herbarium vouchers (deposited in the John D. 
Freeman Herbarium (AUA), of the Auburn University 
Museum of Natural History, Auburn, Alabama, USA) 
are shown in Table 1. 

Nuclear DNA content assessments 

Genome sizes of the target species were estimated 
using flow cytometry. Pisum sativum L. ‘Express Long’ 
(2C = 8.37 pg, Marie and Brown 1993) was used as an 
internal standard. Young, healthy leaf tissue (about 
25 mm2) from each species was placed in a plastic 
Petri dish and chopped in 1,200 µl of LB01 lysis buffer 
(Doležel et al. 1989) with a razor blade. The suspension 
of nuclei was filtered through a nylon mesh with a pore 
size of 70 µm and stained for 20 min with 36 µl of pro-
pidium iodide (60 µg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich Química) and 
supplemented with 100 µg/ml ribonuclease A (Boehring-
er). For each individual, two replicates were prepared 
and processed on the f low cytometer. Measurements 
were made at the Centres Científics i Tecnològics de la 
Universitat de Barcelona using an Epics XL flow cytom-
eter (Coulter Corporation, Hialeah, Fla.). The instrument 
was set up with the standard configuration: excitation of 



39First genome size assessments for Marshallia and Balduina (Asteraceae, Helenieae) reveal significant cytotype diversity

the sample was done using a standard 488 nm air-cooled 
argon-ion laser at 15 mW power. Acquisition was auto-
matically stopped at 8,000 nuclei. The half-peak coef-
ficient of variation was calculated for both target plant 
material and the internal standard. 

Chromosome counts

Root-tip meristems were obtained from achenes ger-
minated on wet filter paper in Petri dishes at room tem-
perature. Seedlings were pretreated with 0.05% aqueous 
colchicine at room temperature for 2.5 h. Material was 
fixed in absolute ethanol and glacial acetic acid (3:1) for 
2 h at room temperature and stored in the fixative at 
4°C. Samples were hydrolyzed in 1 N HCl for 5 min at 
60°C, stained with 1% aqueous aceto-orcein for 4h, and 
squashed on slides in 45% acetic acid-glycerol (9:1). The 
best metaphase plates were photographed with a digital 
camera (AxioCam MRc5 Zeiss) mounted on a Zeiss Axi-
oplan microscope, and images were analyzed with Axio 
Vision Ac software version 4.2.

Phylogenetic tree and data mapping

In order to plot and visualize GS data from a phy-
logenetic perspective, GenBank ITS sequences from 
Hansen and Goertzen (2014) and an outgroup (Heli-
anthus annuus L.) were downloaded using Geneious 
Prime 2020.1.2 (https://www.geneious.com), and aligned 
with CLUSTAL Omega (Sievers et al. 2011). A Maxi-
mum Likelihood tree was then constructed using the 
default settings and 10,000 bootstrap, as implemented 
in Geneious. Genome size data were plotted on the tree 

using the plotTree.wBars function implemented in Phy-
tools package (Revell 2012), and C-value scatterplots 
were carried out using ggplot2 package (Wickham 2016), 
both available in R (R core Team 2019). 

RESULTS

The results obtained for GS, complemented with 
chromosome numbers in some of the accessions are 
shown in Table 2. Illustrative chromosome pictures and 
the distribution of GSs from a phylogenetic perspective 
in Marshallia are depicted in Figure 1. In all investigated 
accessions, flow histograms with coefficients of variation 
below 3.5 were obtained, illustrating the high quality of 
the results obtained. As highlighted above, these two 
genera have never been studied from this perspective, 
and therefore, our results represent the first estimates for 
all of these species. 

DISCUSSION

The combination of GSs with actual chromo-
some data (plus inferred cytotypes) provides interest-
ing insights into the potential impact of polyploidy in 
the evolution of both Marshallia and Balduina. Semple 
and Watanabe (2009) attributed to the tribe Helenieae s. 
str., to which the two genera considered here belong, a 
secondarily derived base number of x = 19. However, all 
counts reported here as well as those previously record-
ed in the literature (see below) correspond to a primary 
base number of x = 9, one of the most frequent in the 
family Asteraceae.

Table 1. Marshallia and Balduina species studied including population code and origin.

Species Code Voucher (in herbarium AUA)

Balduina uniflora Nutt. B1 Live material from AU Davis Arboretum
Marshallia caespitosa Nutt. ex DC. var. Caespitosa M26 Watson 12-01, Pottawatamie Co., OK
M. graminifolia (Walt.) Small M1 Hansen 4951, Covington Co., AL
M. graminifolia (Walt.) Small M39 Hansen 5814, Jackson Co., MS
M. graminifolia (Walt.) Small M40 Hansen 5814, Beauregard Par., LA
M. mohrii Baedle and F.E.Boynton M20 Hansen 5055, Bibb Co., AL
M. mohrii Baedle and F.E.Boynton M21 Hansen 5056, Bibb Co., AL
M. obovata (Walt.) Baedle and F.E.Boynton M3 Hansen 4956, Macon Co., AL
M. obovata (Walt.) Beadle and F.E.Boynton M22 Hansen 5471, Macon Co., AL
M. obovata (Walt.) Beadle and F.E.Boynton M34 Hansen 5786, Bullock Co., AL
M. ramosa Beadle and F.E.Boynton M19 Hansen 5054, Ben Hill Co., GA
M. ramosa Beadle and F.E.Boynton M38 Hansen 5795, Washington Co., FL
M. trinervia (Walt.) Trel. M2 Hansen 4954, Lee Co., AL



40 Teresa Garnatje et al.

Genome size and chromosome diversity in Marshallia 

Nuclear DNA contents varied 2.76-fold in Marshal-
lia, ranging from 11.42 pg/2C in Marshallia trinervia 
(Walt.) Trel. to 31.58 pg/2C in the population M21 of 

Marshallia mohrii Beadle and F.E. Boynton (see Table 2). 
The large GS found in the latter, is further supported by 
the fact that this particular accession is a hexaploid, as 
confirmed by our chromosome counts (2n = 56, Figure 
1a). Furthermore, a likely hybrid origin of this species, 

Table 2. Marshallia and Balduina species studied including genome size measurements and chromosome counts. 

Species Code N1 2C (pg) 2C (Mbp)2 1Cx (pg) HPCV plant HPCV standard 2n 2n3

Balduina uniflora Nutt. 2 12.96±0.00 12675 6.48 2.44±0.37 3.03±0.16 18* 72
M. caespitosa Nutt. ex DC. M26 1 22.83 22328 5.70 1.87 2.85 36* 18,36
M. graminifolia (Walt.) Small M1 1 12.74 12460 6.37 2.50±0.19 2.82±0.05 18 18
M. graminifolia (Walt.) Small M39 1 12.72 12440 6.36 3.23±0.32 3.81±0.06 18* 18
M. graminifolia (Walt.) Small M40 5 12.89±0.27 12606 6.45 2.42±0.48 3.01±0.37 18* 18
M. mohrii Baedle and F.E.Boynton M20 1 16.70 16333 5.56 0.67±0.02 3.31±0.10 27* 36
M. mohrii Baedle and F.E.Boynton M21 4 31.58±0.97 30885 5.26 1.27±0.95 3.08±0.28 54 36
M. obovata (Walt.) Baedle and F.E.Boynton M3 3 13.60±0.51 13300 6.80 2.39±0.35 2.75±0.22 18 18
M. obovata (Walt.) Beadle and F.E.Boynton M22 1 13.73 13428 6.86 2.95±1.60 3.71±0.07 18 18
M. obovata (Walt.) Beadle and F.E.Boynton M34 1 13.92 13614 6.96 2.07±0.06 2.39±0.26 18* 18
M. ramosa Beadle and F.E.Boynton M19 1 16.77 16401 5.59 1.25±0.32 2.20±0.13 27* 18
M. ramosa Beadle and F.E.Boynton M19 2 23.92±0.12 23394 5.98 2.51±0.41 3.27±0.90 36* 18
M. ramosa Beadle and F.E.Boynton M38 2 13.37±0.19 13076 6,68 3.02±0.29 3.44±0.25 18* 18
M. trinervia (Walt.) Trel. M2 3 11.42±0.06 11169 5.71 3.21±0.26 3.30±0.26 18* 18

1 N = numer of individuals. 2 1 pg = 978 Mbp (Doležel et al. 2003). 3 Cromosome Counts Database (Rice et al. 2015). * Chromosome num-
bers inferred from nuclear DNA contents.

Figure 1. A. Illustrative chromosome counts in Marshallia: (top) Marshallia obovata (Walt.) Baedle and F.E. Boynton (M3, 2n = 18). (bot-
tom) Marshallia mohrii (M21, 2n = 56). Scale bars are 10 μm. B. Phylogenetic mapping of genome size data (2C-values) based on ITS 
sequences from Hansen and Goertzen (2014). Inferred ploidy levels based on nuclear DNA contents are indicated.



41First genome size assessments for Marshallia and Balduina (Asteraceae, Helenieae) reveal significant cytotype diversity

with subsequent introgression has been suggested in the 
past. For example, Watson et al. (1991) and more recent-
ly Hansen and Goertzen (2014) suggested an allopoly-
ploid origin of this species, hypothesizing that M. trin-
ervia (2n = 18) could be one of the parents, which is sup-
ported by the very close phylogenetic relationship among 
both species (Hansen and Goertzen 2014). Other species 
possibly involved in the origin of M. mohrii could be 
either M. caespitosa or M. ramosa, given their relatively 
close phylogenetic relationship with this species (Hansen 
and Goertzen 2014). Considering the Federally Endan-
gered status of this imperiled species, further research 
into its apparent cytotype diversity is warranted. 

Of the two investigated accessions of M. mohrii, the 
specimen belonging to population M20 had a GS of 16.70 
pg/2C. Compared to other confirmed diploid accessions 
in this study, such as M. obovata (2C = 12.89 pg) or M. 
graminifolia (2C = 13.60 pg), its nuclear DNA content is 
larger than would have been expected for a diploid acces-
sion. Several mechanisms could be invoked to provide an 
explanation for this GS, such as activation of amplifica-
tion of repetitive DNA and/or polyploidy. Based on the 
value obtained for the hexaploid population of this spe-
cies (M21, 31.58 pg/2C), a triploid cytotype could have, in 
theory, a similar GS as that found in population M20 (as 
inferred in Figure 1). However, to avoid excessive specu-
lation, further studies would be needed to confirm this 
point including an actual chromosome count, and thus 
discard the existence of bursts of DNA amplification as 
the main driver of such genomic expansion. Concern-
ing M. caespitosa, only one individual was analyzed in 
the present study (22.83 pg/2C, Table 2). From this value, 
a tetraploid cytotype can be also inferred (Figure 1), if 
compared with the results in chromosomally-confirmed 
diploid taxa. Certainly, both diploid (2n = 18) and tetra-
ploid (2n = 36) levels are known in the species (Wat-
son and Estes 1990), which makes our inference more 
feasible. Marshallia ramosa, the other possible genome 
donor of M. mohrii, is highly variable in morphology in 
the field, and also in GS (Table 2). In the present study, 
observed nuclear DNA content is compatible with three 
ploidy levels (2x, 3x and 4x; Figure 1), although only 2n 
= 18 has been previously reported for this species (Wat-
son and Estes 1990). Our results thus support a scenario 
where hybridization and introgression might have taken 
place, influencing changes in GS through the likely exist-
ence of multiple ploidy levels. 

In contrast to the above-mentioned cytogenetic vari-
ability, data from M. graminifolia and M. obovata, sug-
gest overall intraspecific GS stability, with values rang-
ing only 1.02 and 1.01-fold among accessions, respec-
tively. Our results confirmed that both species are diploid 

(Table 2, Figure 1), as previously reported by Watson and 
Estes (1990), and therefore the small intraspecific dif-
ferences in GS among them could have arisen through 
chromosomal reorganizations, as previously found in 
other Asteraceae (e.g. Anacyclus; Vitales et al. 2020).

Is genome size diversity mostly driven by polyploidy in 
Marshallia?

The nuclear DNA content estimates and somatic 
chromosome numbers from this study set up a scenario 
where polyploidy has played a significant and ongoing 
role in the in the evolution of Marshallia, influencing 
GS in particular. Genome sizes of around 12-13 pg/2C 
for the diploid level (i.e. 2n = 18), 23-24 pg/2C for the 
tetraploid (putatively corresponding to 2n = 36), and 
31-32 for the hexaploid level (corresponding to 2n = 54) 
were confidently inferred (Figure 1). In addition, two 
populations presented nuclear DNA amounts around 
16-17 pg/2C, suggesting the existence of triploid repre-
sentatives in the genus. If our overall ploidy inferences 
hold true, this would indicate that while M. obovata and 
M. graminifolia clades are essentially diploid, the clade 
including M. mohrii (3x and 6x), M. ramosa (2x, 3x, 4x) 
and M. caespitosa (4x) is cytogenetically highly diverse 
in a somewhat lineage-specific manner (Figure 1, Hans-
en and Goertzen 2014).

Polyploidy and whole genome duplications have been 
shown to have a direct impact on the GS, especially since 
it involves, at least, a duplication of the overall DNA con-
tent (Pellicer et al. 2018). However, genomic restructur-
ing after polyploid formation can result in elimination of 
specific DNA sequences, leading to a loss of linearity in 
the accumulation of DNA, the so-called genome down-
sizing (Leitch and Bennet 2004). This phenomenon can 
be seen in Marshallia, where a reduction of the holoploid 
nuclear DNA content with increasing ploidy levels was 
observed, which was more patent at higher ploidy levels 
(Figure 2a). For example, bearing in mind that 2C-values 
of about 12-13 pg were found in diploid accession, nucle-
ar DNA contents of ca. 18-20 pg would be expected in 
3x, 24-26 pg in 4x, and 36-40 pg (6x) would be expected 
under the assumption of proportional genome expan-
sion. However, the observed results are lower in each 
case (Table 2, Figure 2a). The impact of such reduction 
in Marshallia, is further illustrated by the fact that mon-
oploid C-values (i.e. 1Cx) are lower in polyploids with 
respect to their diploid counterparts (Figure 2b).

As stated, genome downsizing in polyploids is a very 
common phenomenon in plants, and the Asteraceae 
family is no exception. Among other mechanisms, chro-
mosome rearrangements after polyploidy, particularly 



42 Teresa Garnatje et al.

for relatively old genome duplication events, can influ-
ence this process (e.g. Leitch and Bennet 2004, Pellicer 
et al. 2010b, and references therein). In the genus Arte-
misia, even between closely related species, contrasting 
GS dynamics have been reported (Pellicer et al. 2013), 
involving changes in the number and distribution of 
repetitive DNAs, such as ribosomal DNA loci, which 
could influence changes in GS. However, in some other 
cases, genome size additivity has been also described, 
suggesting a more recent origin of such polyploids (e.g. 
Pellicer et al. 2010a). In other groups, both GS increases 
and decreases have been observed (e.g. Nicotiana, Leitch 
et al. 2008). A similar scenario was reported in the gen-
era Hieracium and Centaurea (Bancheva and Greilhuber, 
2006; Chrtek et al. 2009), where multiploid taxa revealed 
both genome downsizing or upsizing in each genus. The 
mechanisms undepinning changes on GS in polyploids 

yet remain to be fully understood, but autopoliploidy 
and introgression could play a relevant role in determin-
ing the GS of the resulting polyploid.

Genus Balduina: nuclear DNA content evidences a poten-
tial unknown diploid cytotype 

Available chromosome numbers compiled in the 
CCDB (Rice et al. 2015) for the genus indicate the pres-
ence of tetraploids in the species Balduina atropurpurea 
Harper. and Balduina angustifolia (Pursh) Robinson (2n 
= 4x; Parker and Jones 1975), and octoploids in Baldui-
na uniflora Nutt. (2n = 8x = 72). Unfortunately, for our 
accession of B. uniflora we have only been able to esti-
mate the GS and an actual chromosome count is thus, 
missing. Certainly, its nuclear DNA content falls within 
the range of GS for diploids encountered in the closely 

Figure 2. A. Scatter plot of observed 2C-values in Marshallia grouped by ploidy level. The dotted line represents the projection of expected 
2C-values given a proportional increase of GS with ascending ploidy levels (note that the prediction is based on average 2C-values of dip-
loid taxa). B. Scatter plot of observed 1Cx-values in Marshallia grouped by ploidy level, which illustrate the reduction of the monoploid 
genome in ascending ploidy levels.



43First genome size assessments for Marshallia and Balduina (Asteraceae, Helenieae) reveal significant cytotype diversity

related genus Marshallia (Table 2), suggesting that this 
accession could likely represent a diploid population. If 
this assumption holds true, then this finding would rep-
resent a new ploidy level report in the species, meaning 
a baseline level for chromosome evolution of the genus, 
which subsequently underwent several rounds of poly-
ploidy. In any case, further chromosome research will 
be necessary to confirm this point and discard any other 
potential taxonomic issues. 

CONCLUSIONS

We have performed the first GS assessments in the 
genera Marshallia and Balduina, complemented with 
chromosomes counts and chromosome number infer-
ences based on nuclear DNA content. The significant, 
ongoing role of polyploidy and hybridization in these 
genera has been discussed. In order to confirm some 
patterns deduced from the data, further research focused 
on chromosome counts should be carried out in all spe-
cies lacking this information, complemented with GS 
in the remaining species of both genera. In Balduina 
angustifolia, the only annual species in the genus (Keen-
er 2006), this research could be particularly interesting 
to test whether it shows a reduced GS associated with 
the faster life cycle than in perennials, as reported in 
many annual taxa (Pellicer et al. 2014, and references 
therein). 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Miquel Veny and Patrick Thompson 
for technical assistance with cultivation of plants, and 
Ricard Álvarez, Jaume Comas, Chary González and 
Sonia Ruíz for technical help in flow cytometric meas-
urements. This work was supported by the Catalan Gov-
ernment under Grant 2017SGR1116. J.P. benefited from 
a Ramón y Cajal fellowship supported by the Ministerio 
de Ciencia y Tecnología (RYC-2017-2274).

REFERENCES

Baldwin BG. 2009. Heliantheae Alliance. In: Funk VA, 
Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ (eds.) Systematics, 
Evolution, and Biogeography of Compositae. IAPT, 
Vienna.

Baldwin BG, Wessa BL. 2000. Phylogenetic placement of 
Pelucha and new subtribes in Helenieae sensu stricto 
(Compositae). Systematic Botany. 25: 522-538.

Bancheva S, Greilhuber J. 2006. Genome size in Bulgar-
ian Centaurea s.l. (Asteraceae). Plant Systematics and 
Evolution. 257:95-117. 

Beaulieu JM, Leitch IJ, Patel S, Pendharkar A, Knight CA. 
2008. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size 
and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytolo-
gist. 179: 975-986. 

Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005. Nuclear DNA amounts in 
angiosperms: progress, problems, prospects. Annals 
of Botany. 95: 45-90.

Chrtek J Jr, Zahradnícek J, Krak K, Fehrer J. 2009. 
Genome size in Hieracium subgenus Hieracium 
(Asteraceae) is strongly correlated with major phylo-
genetic groups. Annals of Botany. 104:161-178.

Doležel J, Binarova P, Lucretti S. 1989. Analysis of nuclear 
DNA content in plant cells by flow cytometry. Bio-
logia Plantarum. 31: 113-120.

Doležel J, Bartoš J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J. 2003. 
Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and 
human. Cytometry 51: 127-128.

Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysák M, Bennett MD. 2005. The 
origin, evolution, and proposed stabilization of the 
terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear 
DNA contents. Annals of Botany 95: 255-260.

Hansen CJ, Goertzen LR. 2014. Validation of nrDNA ITS 
as a DNA barcode for Marshallia (Asteraceae). Pay-
sonia 3: 5-10.

Hidalgo O, Pellicer J, Christenhusz MJM, Schneider H, 
Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. 2017. Is there an upper limit to 
genome size? Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 567–573.

Keener BR. 2006. Balduina. In Flora of North America 
North of Mexico (Flora of North America Editorial 
Committee ed.) 21: 419-420. Oxford University Press, 
New York and Oxford. Knapp WM, Poindexter DB, 
Weakley AS. 2020. The true identity of Marshallia 
grandiflora, an extinct species, and the description of 
Marshallia pulchra (Asteraceae, Helenieae, Marshal-
liinae). Phytotaxa 447: 1-15

Knight CA, Ackerly DD. 2002. Variation in nuclear DNA 
content across environmental gradients: a quantile 
regression analysis. Ecology Letters 5: 66-76.

Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. 2004. Genome downsizing in 
polyploid plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean 
Society 82: 651-663.

Leitch IJ, Hanson L, Lim KY, Kovarik A, Chase MW, 
Clarkson JJ, Leitch AR. 2008. The ups and downs 
of genome size evolution in polyploid species of 
Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Annals of Botany 101: 
805-14. 

Marie D, Brown SC. 1993. A cytometric exercise in plant 
DNA histograms with 2C values for 70 species. Biol-
ogy of the Cell 78: 41-51.



44 Teresa Garnatje et al.

Melton AE, Zwack PJ, Rashotte AM, Goertzen LR. 
2019. Identification and functional characterization 
of the Marshallia (Asteraceae) Clade III Cytokinin 
Response Factor (CRF). Plant Signaling and Behavior 
14: 9, e1633886.

Parker ES, Jones SB. 1975. A Systematic Study of the 
Genus Balduina (Compositae, Heliantheae). Brittonia 
27(4): 355-361. 

Pellicer J, Garnatje T, Molero J, Pustahija F, Siljak-Yak-
ovlev S, Vallès J. 2010a. Origin and evolution of the 
South American endemic Artemisia species (Aster-
aceae): Evidence from molecular phylogeny, riboso-
mal DNA and genome size data. Australian Journal 
of Botany 58: 605-616.

Pellicer J, Garcia S, Canela MÁ, Garnatje T, Korobkov 
AA, Twibell JD, Vallès J. 2010b. Genome size dynam-
ics in Artemisia L. (Asteraceae): Following the track 
of polyploidy. Plant Biology 12: 820-830.

Pellicer, J, Garcia, S, Vallès, J, Kondo, K and Garnatje, T. 
2013. FISH mapping of 35S and 5S rRNA genes in 
Artemisia subgenus Dracunculus (Asteraceae): chang-
es in number of loci during polyploid evolution and 
their systematic implications. Botanical Journal of the 
Linnean Society 171: 655-666. 

Pellicer J, Hidalgo O, Garnatje T, Kondo K, Vallès J. 2014. 
Life cycle versus systematic placement: phylogenetic 
and cytogenetic studies in annual Artemisia (Asteraceae, 
Anthemideae). Turkish Journal of Botany 38: 1112-1122.

Pellicer J, Hidalgo O, Dodsworth S, Leitch IJ. 2018. 
Genome size diversity and its impact on the evolu-
tion of land plants. Genes 9: 88

Pellicer, J Leitch, I.J. 2020. The Plant DNA C‐values data-
base (release 7.1): an updated online repository of 
plant genome size data for comparative studies. New 
Phytologist 226: 301-305. 

R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for 
statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Sta-
tistical Computing.

Revell LJ. 2012. phytools: a R package for phylogenetic 
comparative biology (and other things). Methods in 
Ecology and Evolution 3: 217-223.

Rice et al. 2015. The Chromosome Counts Database 
(CCDB) – a community resource of plant chromo-
some numbers. New Phytologist 206: 19-26.

Semple JC, Watanabe K. 2009. A review of chromosome 
numbers in Asteraceae with hypotheses on chromo-
somal base number evolution. In: Systematics, Evolu-
tion, and Biogeography of Compositae 61-72. Funk 
VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF and Bayer RJ (eds.). IAPT, 
Vienna.

Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen DG, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, 
Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding 

J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. 2011.  Fast, scalable 
generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence 
alignments using Clustal Omega. Molecular Systems 
Biology 7: 539 

Stuessy TF. 2011. Multiple sources of comparative data 
for creative monography. In: Stuessy TF, Lack HW, 
editors. Monographic plant systematics. Fundamental 
assessment of plant biodiversity. Ruggell: ARG Gant-
ner Verlag KG, pp 33-47.

Vallès J, Canela MÁ, Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Pellicer J, 
Sánchez- Jiménez I, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Vitales D, Gar-
natje T. 2013. Genome size variation and evolution in 
the family Asteraceae. Caryologia 66: 221-235.

Vitales D, Fernández P, Garnatje T, Garcia S. 2019. Pro-
gress in the study of genome size evolution in Aster-
aceae: analysis of the last Update. Database Volume 
2019, baz098, https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baz098

Vitales D, Álvarez I, Garcia S, Hidalgo O, Nieto Feliner 
G, Pellicer J, Vallès J, Garnatje T. 2020. Genome size 
variation at constant chromosome number is not cor-
related with repetitive DNA dynamism in Anacyclus 
(Asteraceae). Annals of Botany 125: 611-623. 

Watson LE. 2006. Marshallia. In Flora of North America 
North of Mexico (Flora of North America Editorial 
Committee ed.) 21: 456-458. Oxford University Press, 
New York and Oxford. 

Watson LE, Estes JR. 1990 Biosystematic and phenetic 
analysis of Marshallia (Asteraceae). Systematic Bota-
ny 15: 403-414.

Watson LE, Elisens WJ, Estes JR. 1991. Electrophoretic 
and cytogenetic evidence for allopolyploid origin of 
Marshallia mohrii (Asteraceae). American Journal of 
Botany 78: 408-416.

Weakley AS. 2020. Flora of the southeastern United 
States. University of North Carolina Herbarium, 
North Carolina Botanical Garden.

Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data 
Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. ISBN 978-3-319-
24277-4, https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.


	Caryologia
	International Journal of Cytology, 
Cytosystematics and Cytogenetics
	Volume 74, Issue 1 - 2021
	Firenze University Press