Levi Decomposition of Frobenius Lie Algebra of Dimension 6 CAUCHY –Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi Volume 7(3) (2022), Pages 394-400 p-ISSN: 2086-0382; e-ISSN: 2477-3344 Submitted: April 03, 2022 Reviewed: April 11, 2022 Accepted: April 14, 2022 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/ca.v7i3.15656 Levi Decomposition of Frobenius Lie Algebra of Dimension 6 Henti*, Edi Kurniadi, Ema Carnia Departement of Mathematics of FMIPA, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia Email: henti17001@mail.unpad.ac.id ABSTRACT In this paper, we study notion of the Frobenius Lie algebra M2,1(ℝ) β‹Š 𝔀𝔩2(ℝ) of dimension 6. The finite dimensional Lie algebra can be expressed in terms of decomposition between Levi subalgebra and the radical (maximal solvable ideal). This form of decomposition is called Levi decomposition. Our main object is further denoted by π”žπ”£π”£(2) ≔ M2,1(ℝ) β‹Š 𝔀𝔩2(ℝ). The work aims to obtain Levi decomposition of Frobenius Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) of dimension 6. To obtained Levi subalgebra and the radical, we apply literature reviews about Lie algebra and decomposition Levi in Dagli result. The main result of this paper is Frobenius Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) can be decomposition be semisimple Levi subalgebra π”₯ of dimension 4 and radical solvable Rad(𝔀) of dimension 2. Thus, the Levi decomposition form of the Frobenius Lie algebra is given. Keywords: frobenius lie algebra; levi decomposition; lie algebra; radical INTRODUCTION A vector space over a field that is equipped by Lie brackets which is neither commutative nor associative is called Lie algebra [1]. Any finite dimensional Lie algebra can be expressed as semidirect sum between Levi subalgebra (Lie subalgebra) and its radical (maximal solvable ideal) and this form is called a Levi decomposition [1]. We denote a finite dimensional Lie algebra by 𝔀. On the other hand, for finite dimensional case, the Lie algebra 𝔀 can be written in Levi decomposition form which is given in the following form 𝔀 = π”₯ ⋉ Rad(𝔀) (1) where π”₯ is a Levi subalgebra of 𝔀 and Rad(𝔀) is a radical or solvable maximal ideal of 𝔀. Let 𝑆 = {𝑒1, 𝑒2, … , 𝑒𝑛} be a basis of 𝔀 and we define 𝐢(𝔀) = (𝐢(𝔀)𝑖,𝑗) be a matrix whose Lie brackets entries of 𝔀 are given by 𝐢(𝔀)𝑖,𝑗 ≔ [𝑒𝑖, 𝑒𝑗]𝔀 , 1 ≀ 𝑖, 𝑗 ≀ 𝑛. (2) This matrix 𝐢(𝔀) ∈ π‘€π‘Žπ‘‘(𝑛 Γ— 𝑛, 𝑆(𝔀)) is called a structure matrix of 𝔀 where 𝑆(𝔀) denotes as symmetric algebra of 𝔀 [2]. The notion of Lie algebras has been widely studied. One of which is the investigation of Lie algebra with dimension 8 which can be carried out by Levi's decomposition [3]. Rais introduced the Lie algebra notion 𝑀𝑛,𝑝(ℝ) β‹Š 𝔀𝔩𝑛(ℝ) where 𝑀𝑛,𝑝(ℝ) is a vector space of matrices of size 𝑛 Γ— 𝑝 with real number entries and 𝔀𝔩𝑛(ℝ) is the Lie algebra of a vector space of matrices of size 𝑛 Γ— 𝑛 equipped with Lie brackets [4]. Furthermore, we can see the notions of Lie algebra in [5] and [6]. http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/ca.v7i3.15656 mailto:henti17001@mail.unpad.ac.id* Levi Decomposition of Frobenius Lie Algebra of Dimension 6 Henti 395 Let 𝔀 be a Lie algebra with π”€βˆ— is a dual vector space of 𝔀 where π”€βˆ— consisting of real valued all linear functional on 𝔀. The Lie algebra 𝔀 is said to be a Frobenius Lie algebra if there exists a linear functional πœ‘ ∈ π”€βˆ— so that the skew-symmetric bilinear form π΅πœ‘ (π‘₯, 𝑦) ≔ πœ‘([π‘₯, 𝑦]) is non degenerate. Many studies of Frobenius Lie algebras have been carried out over the years. For instance, the properties of principal elements on Frobenius Lie algebra one of them is Frobenius Lie algebra cannot be unimodular [7]. An example of Frobenius Lie algebra is the affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) can be seen in the classification of Frobenius Lie algebra with dimension less than or equal to 6 [8]. Kurniadi have constructed Frobenius Lie algebra with dimension less than or equal to 6 from non-commutative nilpotent Lie algebra with dimension less than or equal to 4 [9]. Other example of Frobenius Lie algebra, notation Lie algebra 𝑀𝑛,𝑝(ℝ) β‹Š 𝔀𝔩𝑛(ℝ) where 𝑛 = 𝑝 = 3 is Frobenius Lie algebra of dimension 18 [10]. Moreover, the Lie algebra 𝑀3(ℝ) β‹Š 𝔀𝔩3(ℝ) has quasi-associative algebra structure [11]. The Frobenius Lie algebra M2(ℝ) β‹Š 𝔀𝔩2(ℝ) is the left-symmetric algebra [12]. It has been proven that the affine Lie algebra that is denoted by π”žπ”£π”£(𝑛) ≔ ℝ𝑛 β‹Š 𝔀𝔩𝑛(ℝ) is Frobenius Lie algebra where ℝ 𝑛 is another form of 𝑀𝑛,1(ℝ) [13]. Readers can study more about Frobenius Lie algebra in the following articles: [14], [15], [16], and [17]. In this paper, we study about decompose Frobenius Lie algebra for special case 𝑛 = 2 of the affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(𝑛). The notion M2,1(ℝ) β‹Š 𝔀𝔩2(ℝ) can be written in simpler formulas as ℝ2 β‹Š 𝔀𝔩2(ℝ) and we can denote it by π”žπ”£π”£(2) which is known as the affine Lie algebra. In the nice formula, the affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) ≔ ℝ2 β‹Š 𝔀𝔩2(ℝ) can be expressed in the form of a matrix π”žπ”£π”£(2) ≔ {( 𝑋 π‘Œ 0 0 ) ; 𝑋 ∈ 𝔀𝔩2(ℝ), π‘Œ ∈ ℝ 2} βŠ† 𝔀𝔩3(ℝ) (3) where 𝔀𝔩3(ℝ) is 3 Γ— 3 real matrix. The purpose of this research is to give decompose this Lie algebra into Levi subalgebra and radical. METHODS We used literature study for the research method, especially the study of Frobenius Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) and about Levi decomposition of Lie algebra in [18]. First, we given an affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2). We proved the affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) not solvable. Then, it is proved that Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) can be decomposed into its subalgebra and radical. Before going into the discussion, we would like to introduce the theoretical foundations used in this study as follows: Definition 1 [19] Let 𝔀 be a vector space and a bilinear form [. , . ]: 𝔀 Γ— 𝔀 βˆ‹ (π‘₯, 𝑦) ↦ [π‘₯, 𝑦] ∈ 𝔀. The bilinear form [. , . ] is called a Lie bracket for 𝔀 if the following condisitions are satisfied: 1. [π‘₯, 𝑦] = βˆ’[𝑦, π‘₯]; βˆ€ π‘₯, 𝑦 ∈ 𝔀 2. [π‘₯, [𝑦, 𝑧]] + [𝑦, [𝑧, π‘₯]] + [𝑧, [π‘₯, 𝑦]] = 0; βˆ€ π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝔀. The vector space 𝔀 equipped by Lie brackets is called Lie algebra. Definition 2 [19] A linear subspace π”₯ of 𝔀 is called a Lie sub-algebra if [π”₯, π”₯] βŠ† π”₯, we denote by π”₯ < 𝔀. If we have [𝔀, π”₯ ] βŠ† π”₯, we call π”₯ as an ideal of 𝔀 and then write π”₯ ⊴ 𝔀. Definition 3 [19] Let 𝔀 be a Lie algebra. The derived series of 𝔀 is defined by 𝐷0(𝔀) = 𝔀 and 𝐷𝑛(𝔀) = [π·π‘›βˆ’1(𝔀), π·π‘›βˆ’1(𝔀)] βˆ€π‘› ∈ β„• (4) The Lie algebra 𝔀 is said to be solvable, if there exists an 𝑛 ∈ β„• with 𝐷𝑛(𝔀) = {0}. Theorem 1 Let 𝔀 be Lie algebra then, Levi Decomposition of Frobenius Lie Algebra of Dimension 6 Henti 396 i. If 𝔀 is solvable then the subalgebras and homomorphic images of 𝔀 are solvable. ii. If π”₯ is a solvable ideal of 𝔀 and 𝔀/π”₯ is solvable, then 𝔀 is solvable iii. If π”₯ and 𝔦 are solvable ideals of 𝔀 then π”₯ + 𝔦 is also a solvable ideal of 𝔀. This theorem shows that the sum of all solvable ideals of a Lie algebra is a solvable ideal. So, in every finite-dimensional Lie algebra 𝔀, there exists a maximal solvable ideal. This ideal is called the radical of 𝔀 and denoted by π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀). Theorem 2 [18] Let 𝑉 be vector space over a field and let 𝔀 be a subalgebra of 𝔀𝔩(𝑉), the 𝔀 is solvable if Tr(π‘₯𝑦) = 0 for all π‘₯ ∈ 𝔀 and 𝑦 ∈ [𝔀, 𝔀]. Theorem 3 [18] Let 𝔀 be Lie algebra over a field 𝔽, then π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀) = {π‘₯ ∈ 𝔀 | π‘‡π‘Ÿ(ad π‘₯ β‹… ad 𝑦) = 0} (5) for all 𝑦 ∈ [𝔀, 𝔀]. Definition 4 [19] Let 𝔀 be a Lie algebra. If its radical is trivial i.e π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀) = {0} then 𝔀 is called semisimple. The Lie algebra 𝔀 is said to be simple if it is not abelian and if it contains no ideal other than 𝔀 and {0}. Definition 5 [1] Let 𝑉 be a space vector. A linear map 𝜌: 𝑉 β†’ 𝑉 is said to be endomorphism on 𝑉 if the following condition satisfied: 1. 𝜌(π‘₯ + 𝑦) = 𝜌(π‘₯) + 𝜌(𝑦) 2. 𝜌(π‘₯𝑦) = (𝜌(π‘₯))𝑦 = π‘₯(𝜌(𝑦)) for all π‘₯, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉. The set of all endomorphism on 𝑉 is denoted by 𝐸𝑛𝑑(𝑉). Furthermore, the endomorphism 𝐸𝑛𝑑(𝑉) equipped by Lie bracket [π‘₯, 𝑦] = π‘₯𝑦 βˆ’ 𝑦π‘₯ for all π‘₯, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐸𝑛𝑑(𝑉) is Lie algebra and it is called a general linear algebra, we denoted by 𝔀𝔩(V). Definition 6 [19] Let 𝔀 be a Lie algebra and π‘₯ ∈ 𝔀. The map π‘Žπ‘‘: 𝔀 β†’ 𝔀 defined by ad π‘₯ ∢ 𝔀 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ ad π‘₯(𝑦) = [π‘₯, 𝑦] ∈ 𝔀 (6) is a derivation. The map ad: 𝔀 β†’ 𝔀𝔩(𝔀) is called an adjoint representation. Let a representation of Lie algebra 𝔀 in the dual vector space π”€βˆ— is denoted by adβˆ— whose value on 𝔀 is defined by 〈adβˆ—(π‘₯)πœ‘, 𝑦βŒͺ = βŒ©πœ‘, adβˆ—(βˆ’π‘₯)𝑦βŒͺ = βŒ©πœ‘, [𝑦, π‘₯]βŒͺ (7) for πœ‘ ∈ π”€βˆ—, for all π‘₯, 𝑦 ∈ 𝔀. A stabilizer of Lie algebra 𝔀 at the point πœ‘ ∈ π”€βˆ— is given in the following form: π”€πœ‘ = {π‘₯ ∈ 𝔀 | adβˆ—(π‘₯)πœ‘ = 0} (8) Definition 7 [20] Let 𝔀 be a Lie algebra whose π”€βˆ— be a dual vector space of 𝔀. A Lie algebra 𝔀 is said to be Frobenius Lie algebra if there exist linear functional πœ‘ ∈ π”€βˆ— such that the stabilizer of 𝔀 on πœ‘ is equal to 0. Furthermore, we review briefly some basic notations needed in Levi decomposition. We explain Levi’s theorem which states that a finite dimensional Lie algebra can be expressed as the semidirect sum of the Levi subalgebra and the radical. Theorem 4 [18] Let 𝔀 be a Lie algebra and let 𝔀 be not solvable, then 𝔀/π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀) is a semisimple Lie subalgebra. Theorem 5 [18] Let 𝔀 be a finite dimensional Lie algebra. If 𝔀 is not solvable, then there is a semisimple subalgebra 𝔰 of 𝔀 such that 𝔀 = 𝔰 βŠ• π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀). (9) In this decomposition, 𝔰 β‰… 𝔀/π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀) and we have commutation relations as follows [𝔰, 𝔰] = 𝔰, [𝔰, π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀)] βŠ† π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀), [π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀), π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀)] βŠ† π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀). (10) The example of Levi decomposition can be seen in the work of [18], one of all example its Levi decomposition as follows Example 1 [18] Let 𝔀 be a Lie algebra spanned by Levi Decomposition of Frobenius Lie Algebra of Dimension 6 Henti 397 {π‘₯1 = ( 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ) , π‘₯2 = ( 1 0 0 0 βˆ’1 0 0 0 1 ) , π‘₯3 = ( 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ) , π‘₯4 = ( 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 )} (11) where Lie bracket non-zero is [π‘₯1, π‘₯2] = 4π‘₯1 βˆ’ 4π‘₯3 βˆ’ 2π‘₯4, [π‘₯1, π‘₯3] = π‘₯1 βˆ’ π‘₯2 βˆ’ π‘₯4, [π‘₯2, π‘₯3] = βˆ’2π‘₯1 + 2π‘₯3 + 2π‘₯4, [π‘₯2, π‘₯4] = βˆ’4π‘₯1 + 4π‘₯3 + 2π‘₯4, [π‘₯3, π‘₯4] = βˆ’π‘₯1 + π‘₯2 + π‘₯4. The Lie algebra 𝔀 can be express in 𝔀 = π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀) β‹Š π”₯ where radical π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(𝔀) = π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘› {( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 )} and Levi subalgebra π”₯ is spanned by {𝑧1 = ( 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ) , 𝑧2 = ( 1 0 0 0 βˆ’1 0 0 0 0 ) , 𝑧3 = ( 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )}. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In this section, let π”žπ”£π”£(2) be the affine Lie algebra and let π”žπ”£π”£(2) be realized in the following matrix form π”žπ”£π”£(2) = {( π‘Ž 𝑏 π‘₯ 𝑐 𝑑 𝑦 0 0 0 ) | π‘Ž, 𝑏, 𝑐, 𝑑, π‘₯, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ} βŠ† 𝔀𝔩3(ℝ), (12) with the standard basis for π”žπ”£π”£(2), we have 𝑆 = {π‘₯1 = ( 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) , π‘₯2 = ( 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) , π‘₯3 = ( 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ) , π‘₯4 = ( 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ) , π‘₯5 = ( 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) , π‘₯6 = ( 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 )}. (13) The Lie brackets for the affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) is defined by [π‘Ž, 𝑏] = π‘Žπ‘ βˆ’ π‘π‘Ž, βˆ€ π‘Ž, 𝑏 ∈ π”žπ”£π”£(2) such that the non-zero Lie brackets for the affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) as follows (14) Theorem 5 [8] Let π”žπ”£π”£(2) be a Lie algebra of dimension 6 with basis in the equation (13). Let π”žπ”£π”£(2)βˆ— be its dual vector space of π”žπ”£π”£(2). Then there exist a linear functional πœ‘ = π‘₯2 βˆ— + π‘₯6 βˆ— ∈ π”žπ”£π”£(2)βˆ— such that π”€πœ‘ = {0}. Therefore, the affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) is Frobenius. In this section of the discussion is our main result, we will prove the Proposition 1 and the Proposition 2 as follows. Proposition 1. The affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) is not solvable. Proof. We have that 𝐷1(π”žπ”£π”£(2)) = [𝐷(π”žπ”£π”£(2)), 𝐷(π”žπ”£π”£(2))] = π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘›{π‘₯1 βˆ’ π‘₯4, π‘₯2, π‘₯3, π‘₯5, π‘₯6}. Next, we compute 𝐷2(π”žπ”£π”£(2)) also obtained 𝐷2(π”žπ”£π”£(2)) = [𝐷1(π”žπ”£π”£(2)), 𝐷1(π”žπ”£π”£(2))] = π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘›{π‘₯1 βˆ’ π‘₯4, π‘₯2, π‘₯3, π‘₯5, π‘₯6}. Therefore, there not exist 𝑛 > 0 that causes 𝐷𝑛(π”žπ”£π”£(2)) = {0}. Thus, the affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) is not solvable. ∎ Proposition 2. Let π”žπ”£π”£(2) be Frobenius affine Lie algebra whose basis 𝑆 = {π‘₯𝑖}𝑖=1 6 where the non-zero brackets for π”žπ”£π”£(2) in the equation (14). The affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) is not [π‘₯1, π‘₯2] = π‘₯2, [π‘₯1, π‘₯3] = βˆ’π‘₯3, [π‘₯1, π‘₯5] = π‘₯5, [π‘₯2, π‘₯3] = π‘₯1 βˆ’ π‘₯4, [π‘₯2, π‘₯4] = π‘₯2, [π‘₯2, π‘₯6] = π‘₯5, [π‘₯3, π‘₯4] = βˆ’π‘₯3, [π‘₯3, π‘₯5] = π‘₯6, [π‘₯4, π‘₯6] = π‘₯6. Levi Decomposition of Frobenius Lie Algebra of Dimension 6 Henti 398 solvable then there exist π”₯ = π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘›{π‘₯1, π‘₯2 + π‘₯5 + π‘₯6, π‘₯3 + π‘₯5 + π‘₯6, π‘₯4} is the semisimple Lie subalgebra of π”žπ”£π”£(2) and π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(π”žπ”£π”£(2)) = π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘›{π‘₯5, π‘₯6} is the radical of π”žπ”£π”£(2) such that π”žπ”£π”£(2) = π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘›{π‘₯5, π‘₯6} β‹Š π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘›{π‘₯1, π‘₯2 + π‘₯5 + π‘₯6, π‘₯3 + π‘₯5 + π‘₯6, π‘₯4}. (15) Proof. Firstly, we have the structure matrix of π”žπ”£π”£(2) is 𝐢(π”žπ”£π”£(2)) = ( 0 π‘₯2 βˆ’π‘₯3 0 π‘₯5 0 βˆ’π‘₯2 0 π‘₯1 βˆ’ π‘₯4 π‘₯2 0 π‘₯5 π‘₯3 π‘₯4 βˆ’ π‘₯1 0 βˆ’π‘₯3 π‘₯6 0 0 βˆ’π‘₯2 π‘₯3 0 0 π‘₯6 βˆ’π‘₯5 0 βˆ’π‘₯6 0 0 0 0 βˆ’π‘₯5 0 βˆ’π‘₯6 0 0 ) . (16) Then, we find the maximal linearly independent set in the structure matrix such that basis 𝐡 = {𝑦1 = π‘₯1 βˆ’ π‘₯4, 𝑦2 = π‘₯2, 𝑦3 = π‘₯3, 𝑦4 = π‘₯5, 𝑦5 = π‘₯6} of the product space [π”žπ”£π”£(2), π”žπ”£π”£(2)]. Next, calculate ad π‘₯𝑖 and ad 𝑦𝑗 for 1 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ 6, 1 ≀ 𝑗 ≀ 5, we get ad π‘₯1 = [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 βˆ’1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0] , ad π‘₯2 = [ 0 0 1 0 0 0 βˆ’1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 βˆ’1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0] , ad π‘₯3 = [ 0 βˆ’1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 βˆ’1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0] , ad π‘₯4 = [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 βˆ’1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1] , ad π‘₯5 = [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 βˆ’1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 βˆ’1 0 0 0] , ad π‘₯6 = [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 βˆ’1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 βˆ’1 0 0] , ad 𝑦1 = ad π‘₯1 βˆ’ π‘₯4 = [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 βˆ’2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 βˆ’1] . (17) Furthermore, compute the radical of π”žπ”£π”£(2) where π‘₯ = βˆ‘ 𝛼𝑖π‘₯𝑖 6 𝑖=1 ∈ π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(π”žπ”£π”£(2)), then find value 𝛼𝑖 using equations (17), we have βˆ‘ 𝛼𝑖 6 𝑖=1 π‘‡π‘Ÿ (π‘Žπ‘‘ π‘₯𝑖 β‹… π‘Žπ‘‘ 𝑦𝑗) = 0 ; 1 < 𝑗 ≀ 5 𝛼1 [ 5 0 0 0 0] + 𝛼2 [ 0 5 5 0 0] + 𝛼3 [ 0 5 0 0 0] + 𝛼4 [ βˆ’5 0 0 0 0 ] + 𝛼5 [ 0 0 0 0 0] + 𝛼6 [ 0 0 0 0 0] = [ 0 0 0 0 0] . (18) Levi Decomposition of Frobenius Lie Algebra of Dimension 6 Henti 399 Next, we solve linear equations (18) such we find that 𝛼1 βˆ’ 𝛼4 = 0, 𝛼2 = 0, 𝛼3 = 0, 𝛼5 = 𝑠, 𝛼6 = 𝑑, and with 𝛼1 = 0, then we get π‘₯ = βˆ‘ 𝛼𝑖π‘₯𝑖 6 𝑖=1 = 0π‘₯1 + 0π‘₯2 + 0π‘₯3 + 0π‘₯4 + 𝑠π‘₯5 + 𝑑π‘₯6 = 𝑠π‘₯5 + 𝑑π‘₯6. Therefore, we obtain the radical of π”žπ”£π”£(2) is π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(π”žπ”£π”£(2)) = π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘›{π‘₯5, π‘₯6} = π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘›{π‘Ÿ1, π‘Ÿ2}. (19) Next, we find basis Levi subalgebra of π”žπ”£π”£(2). In this cases, π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(π”žπ”£π”£(2)) is abelian because [π‘Ÿπ‘–, π‘Ÿπ‘—] = 0 for all 1 ≀ 𝑖, 𝑗 ≀ 2. Complement on π”žπ”£π”£(2) respect to π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(π”žπ”£π”£(2)) spanned by {π‘₯1, π‘₯2, π‘₯3, π‘₯4}. The quotient algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2)/π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(π”žπ”£π”£(2)) is spanned by οΏ½Μ…οΏ½1, οΏ½Μ…οΏ½2, οΏ½Μ…οΏ½3, οΏ½Μ…οΏ½4 and we have its brackets as follows [οΏ½Μ…οΏ½1, οΏ½Μ…οΏ½2] = οΏ½Μ…οΏ½2, [οΏ½Μ…οΏ½1, οΏ½Μ…οΏ½3] = βˆ’οΏ½Μ…οΏ½3, [οΏ½Μ…οΏ½2, οΏ½Μ…οΏ½3] = οΏ½Μ…οΏ½1 βˆ’ οΏ½Μ…οΏ½4, [οΏ½Μ…οΏ½2, οΏ½Μ…οΏ½4] = οΏ½Μ…οΏ½2, [οΏ½Μ…οΏ½3, οΏ½Μ…οΏ½4] = βˆ’οΏ½Μ…οΏ½3. (20) We set Levi subalgebra spanned by 𝑧1 = π‘₯1 + 𝛼1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛼2π‘Ÿ2, 𝑧2 = π‘₯2 + 𝛽1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛽2π‘Ÿ2, 𝑧3 = π‘₯3 + 𝛾1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛾2π‘Ÿ2, 𝑧4 = π‘₯4 + 𝛿1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛿2π‘Ÿ2. (21) Next, we calculate to determine the four unknown 𝛼, 𝛽, 𝛾, 𝛿 such that 𝑧1, 𝑧2, 𝑧3, 𝑧4 span a semisimple Lie algebra that is isomorphic to π”žπ”£π”£(2)/π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘(π”žπ”£π”£(2)). Since 𝑧1, 𝑧2, 𝑧3, 𝑧4 have the same commutation relations as �̅�𝑖, 1 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ 4 written in equations (20), we then get [𝑧1, 𝑧2] = 𝑧2, [𝑧1, 𝑧3] = βˆ’π‘§3, [𝑧2, 𝑧3] = 𝑧1 βˆ’ 𝑧4, [𝑧2, 𝑧4] = 𝑧2, [𝑧3, 𝑧4] = βˆ’π‘§3. (22) We substitution the equation (22) onto (23) such that equation can be written as [π‘₯1 + 𝛼1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛼2π‘Ÿ2, π‘₯2 + 𝛽1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛽2π‘Ÿ2] = π‘₯2 + 𝛽1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛽2π‘Ÿ2, (23) [π‘₯1 + 𝛼1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛼2π‘Ÿ2, π‘₯3 + 𝛾1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛾2π‘Ÿ2] = βˆ’(π‘₯3 + 𝛾1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛾2π‘Ÿ2), (24) [π‘₯2 + βˆ‘ π›½π‘—π‘Ÿπ‘— 2 𝑗=1 , π‘₯3 + βˆ‘ π›Ύπ‘—π‘Ÿπ‘— 2 𝑗=1 ] = (π‘₯1 + βˆ‘ π›Όπ‘—π‘Ÿπ‘— 2 𝑗=1 ) βˆ’ (π‘₯4 + βˆ‘ π›Ώπ‘—π‘Ÿπ‘— 2 𝑗=1 )(25) [π‘₯2 + 𝛽1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛽2π‘Ÿ2, π‘₯4 + 𝛿1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛿2π‘Ÿ2] = π‘₯2 + 𝛽1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛽2π‘Ÿ2, (26) [π‘₯3 + 𝛾1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛾2π‘Ÿ2, π‘₯4 + 𝛿1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛿2π‘Ÿ2] = βˆ’(π‘₯3 + 𝛾1π‘Ÿ1 + 𝛾2π‘Ÿ2). (27) Then, we apply the equations (23), (24), (25), (26), and (27) to compute 𝛼𝑖, 𝛽𝑖, 𝛾𝑖, 𝛿𝑖, 1 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ 2. From equations (23) and (26) obtained that 𝛽1 = 𝛽2 = 1. From equations (24) and (27) obtained that 𝛾1 = 𝛾2 = 1. For equations (25), we obtained that 𝛼1 βˆ’ 𝛿1 = 𝛼2 βˆ’ 𝛿2 = 0 and let 𝛼𝑖 = 0, such that we have 𝑧1 = π‘₯1, 𝑧2 = π‘₯2 + π‘Ÿ1 + π‘Ÿ2, 𝑧3 = π‘₯3 + π‘Ÿ1 + π‘Ÿ2, 𝑧4 = π‘₯4. Thus, the Levi subalgebra spanned by {𝑧1 = ( 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) , 𝑧2 = ( 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ) , 𝑧3 = ( 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 ) , 𝑧4 = ( 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 )}. (28) ∎ CONCLUSIONS It has been proven in Proposition 2 that the affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(2) can be decomposed into its subalgebra and radicals which written in the equations (15). From our result of this paper, other research can study about decomposition of the general formula affine Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(n) of dimension 𝑛(𝑛 + 1). For future research, the decomposition process can be expanded from the decomposition result of π”žπ”£π”£(𝑛) in its radical and Levi subalgebra form such that we can find structure Frobenius Lie algebra π”žπ”£π”£(𝑛) of its decomposition. Levi Decomposition of Frobenius Lie Algebra of Dimension 6 Henti 400 REFERENCES [1] J. E. Humphreys, Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory. Springer, 1972. [2] M. A. Alvarez, M. C. RodrΓ­guez-Vallarte, and G. Salgado, β€œContact and Frobenius solvable Lie algebras with abelian nilradical,” Commun. Algebr., vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 4344–4354, 2018, doi: 10.1080/00927872.2018.1439048. [3] P. Turkowski, β€œLow-dimensional real Lie algebras,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2139–2144, 1988, doi: 10.1063/1.528140. [4] M. Rais, β€œLa reprΓ©sentation coadjointe du groupe affine,” vol. 4, pp. 913–937, 1978. [5] M. A. Alvarez, M. C. RodrΓ­guez-Vallarte, and G. Salgado, β€œContact nilpotent Lie algebras,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc., vol. 145, no. 4, pp. 1467–1474, 2017, doi: 10.1090/proc/13341. [6] I. V. Mykytyuk, β€œStructure of the coadjoint orbits of Lie algebras,” J. Lie Theory, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 251–268, 2012. [7] A. Diatta and B. Manga, β€œOn properties of principal elements of frobenius lie algebras,” J. Lie Theory, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 849–864, 2018. [8] B. CsikΓ³s and L. VerhΓ³czki, β€œClassification of frobenius Lie algebras of dimension ≀ 6,” Publ. Math., vol. 70, no. 3–4, pp. 427–451, 2007. [9] E. Kurniadi, β€œDEKOMPOSISI DAN SIFAT MATRIKS STRUKTUR PADA ALJABAR LIE FROBENIUS BERDIMENSI 4,” no. 1, pp. 392–399, 2021. [10] Henti, E. Kurniadi, and E. Carnia, β€œOn Frobenius functionals of the Lie algebra M3(ℝ) βŠ• gl3(ℝ),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1872, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742- 6596/1872/1/012015. [11] Henti, E. Kurniadi, and E. Carnia, β€œQuasi Associative ALgebras on the Frobenius Lie Algebra M3(ℝ) βŠ• gl3(ℝ),” Al-Jabar J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/al- jabar/article/view/2014/1564. [12] E. Kurniadi, N. Gusriani, and B. Subartini, β€œA Left-Symmetric Structure on The Semi-Direct Sum Real Frobenius Lie Algebra of Dimension 8,” Cauchy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 267–280, 2022, doi: 10.18860/ca.v7i2.13462. [13] E. Kurniadi and H. Ishi, β€œHarmonic analysis for 4-dimensional real frobenius lie algebras,” Springer Proc. Math. Stat., vol. 290, no. March, pp. 95–109, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-26562-5_4. [14] Diatta, A., B. Manga, and A. Mbaye, β€œOn Systems of Commuting Matrices, Frobenius Lie Algebras and Gerstenhaber’s Theorem,” arXiv:2002.08737., 2020. [15] D. N. Pham, β€œ$\frak{g}$-quasi-Frobenius Lie algebras,” Arch. Math., vol. 52, pp. 233–262, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.01680. [16] M. Goze and E. Remm, β€œContact and Frobenius forms on Lie groups,” Differ. Geom. its Appl., vol. 35, pp. 74–94, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.difgeo.2014.05.008. [17] T. Barajas, E. Roque, and G. Salgado, β€œPrincipal derivations and codimension one ideals in contact and Frobenius Lie algebras,” Commun. Algebr., vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 5380–5391, 2019, doi: 10.1080/00927872.2019.1623238. [18] M. Dagli, β€œLevi Decomposition of Lie Algebras; Algorithms for its Computation,” Iowa State University, 2004. [19] J. Hilgert and K.-H. Neeb, Structure and Geometry of Lie Groups. New York: Springer Monographs in Mathematics, 2012. [20] A. I. Ooms, On frobenius lie algebras, vol. 8, no. 1. 1980.