CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS 

VOL. 81, 2020 

A publication of 

The Italian Association 
of Chemical Engineering 
Online at www.cetjournal.it 

Guest Editors: Petar S. Varbanov, Qiuwang Wang, Min Zeng, Panos Seferlis, Ting Ma, Jiří J. Klemeš 

Copyright © 2020, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 

ISBN 978-88-95608-79-2; ISSN 2283-9216 

Thermal Stability and Thermodynamics in the Process of 

Synthesising 1, 3-dimethylurea 

Yixun Weia, Qingsheng Zhaob, Shengnan Yub, Jinhua Yina,* 

aInstitute of Chemical Technology, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, No.53 Zhengzhou Rd, Qingdao 

 Shandong, P.R.China. 
bQingdao Q.K.L.Y. S&T Consulting Development Co.Ltd, No.51-2, Wuyang Rd, Qingdao, Shandong, P.R.China. 

 yinjinhua@126.com 

The present work aims to study the thermal stability and thermodynamics in the process of synthesizing 1, 3-

dimethylurea. The HPLC spectrograms were used to study the impacts of reaction time and temperature on 

the thermal behaviour of the ammonolysis reaction system. Rate equation of the ammonolysis reaction can be 

summed up as c(t) = 1016.24*e-(t/47.9403) +16.1935. Thermal stability curve also can be determined. 

Experimental results revealed that the process of synthesizing 1, 3-dimethylurea was of pseudo-first-order 

reaction kinetics and k value was 0.0163 min-1. Thermodynamics results indicated that enthalpy was -1.92 

kJ/mol, Gibbs free energy was -8.51 J/mol, and entropy was 15.96 J/mol*K. The reaction was an exothermic, 

spontaneous and entropy increasing process. Based on thermal stability and thermodynamics study, 

synthesis of 1, 3-dimethylurea was unfavourable at higher temperature as well as long reaction time.  

1. Introduction

1, 3-dimethylurea is widely used in the printing, food and preservative industries. In industrial production, urea 

is utilized for the production of 1, 3-dimethylurea through ammonolysis reaction with methylamine. (Novaes et 

al., 2017). However, in this reaction urea and urea compounds have poor thermal stability, which can result in 

side reactions. Impurities produced by side reactions are the source of pollution once evacuated into the 

environment (Koyuncu et al., 2001), the treatment of impurities also consumes high cost and energy. For 

above reasons, it is extremely important to study thermal behavior in the process of synthesizing 1, 3-

dimethylurea to reduce the generation of impurities. In this work, thermal stability and thermodynamics were 

studied to evaluate the thermal behaviour. 

Since 1,3-dimethylurea have widespread applications in medicine and polymer industry, many papers focus 

on the pharmaceutical synthesis, analysis, and applications of its downstream products. In 1952, The rate 

constants and the activation energies of the thermal dissociation of sym-dimethylurea, asym-dimethylurea and 

asym-phenylethylurea in Butyric Acid were studied (Hoshino et al., 1952). While in 1984, the initial 

decomposition temperatures of various ureas by using thermal gravimetry and infrared analyses (Skuches et 

al., 1984). However, to the best our knowledge, there is no report on thermal behaviour of synthesizing 1,3-

dimethylurea. At present, the big flaw of using urea and methylamine to produce 1,3-dimethylurea is the 

thermal instability of products. In this research, as shown in Figure 3, thermal stability curve not only showed 

the reaction boundary of temperature but also revealed the thermal behaviour of synthesizing 1,3-

dimethylurea. Only a few data are available on the kinetics and thermodynamics data. In 1978, Shigeru 

systematically studied the kinetics and thermodynamics of synthesizing N, N'-dimethylurea from monomethyl 

amine and carbon. In this work, as shown in section 3.2, the kinetic model can be described a pseudo-first-

model which response to the previous work. The parameters obtained can help to predict the kinetics and 

thermodynamics of other ways to synthesize 1, 3-dimethylurea. In this study, kinetics and thermodynamics of 

synthesizing 1,3-dimethylurea were explored to help to understand the trend, degree and driving force of the 

reaction, and they also play an important role to explain the characteristics, laws and possible mechanisms 

(Boutemak et al., 2019). The kinetic study contains reaction order and rate constant (Aieta et al., 1986). HPLC 

spectrograms were used to study the impacts of reaction time and temperature on the thermal behaviour of 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                 DOI: 10.3303/CET2081112 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Paper Received: 26/03/2020; Revised: 27/05/2020; Accepted: 04/06/2020 
Please cite this article as: Wei Y., Zhao Q., Yu S., Yin J., 2020, Thermal Stability and Thermodynamics in the Process of Synthesising 1, 3-
dimethylurea, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 81, 667-672  DOI:10.3303/CET2081112 
  

667



the ammonolysis reaction system. The main objective of this study is to develop a thermal stability curve from 

the ammonolysis reaction of urea with methylamine, to provide guidance for energy saving and emission 

reduction. 

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Materials 

Saturated methylamine solution was supplied by Xinhua Pharmaceutical (Shou Guang) Co., Ltd. Urea (A.R.) 

was purchased from Shandong Lianmeng Chemical Group Co.,Ltd. Calcium oxide(A.R.) was purchased from 

Damao Chemical factory. Acetonitrile (G.R.) and triethylamine (A.R.) were purchased from Sinopharm 

Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Phosphoric acid (A.R.) was purchased from Shanghai Ail Chemical Reagent 

Co.,Ltd 

2.2 Characterization 

The reactant concentrations, product concentrations, reaction temperature and reaction time, were 

determined. The concentrations in the mixture were measured by a constant gradient reversed-phase high-

performance liquid chromatography (LC-100; Exformma Technologies, China): The wavelength of the detector 

was set at 205 nm. A ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 column (5μm, 4.6×250 mm) was used for compound 

separation. The mobile phase consisted of 2 % triethylamine in water, add phosphoric acid to pH=3 (A) and 

acetonitrile (B). The proportion (v/v) of solvent A: B = 96: 4. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the injection 

volume was 20 μL. All standard samples were prepared for calibration curve construction. 

2.3 Experimental 

Experiments were carried out in 500 mL four-necks-round-bottom-flask containing 50 g of melting urea at 130 

°C. An appropriate amount of saturated methylamine solution was added to a gas generator to gain gaseous 

methylamine. The damp gas was introduced into Calcium oxide desiccator to purification. Purified gas was 

injected into the melting urea with agitation and the reactor was heated to 140 °C for 3 h. In the first hour, 

samples were tested every 15 min; in the second hour, samples were tested every 20 min; in the third hour, 

samples were tested every 30 min. After each collecting, samples were analysed by high-performance liquid 

chromatography methods to measure the concentrations. Based on experimental data, Concentration (c) -

Time (t) curve was obtained via regression.  

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Thermal Stability 

Effect of reaction time 

Table 1 tabulates the concentration of urea for experimental ammonolysis reaction, 140 °C, 180 min of 

reaction time.  

Table 1: The concentration of urea for ammonolysis reaction, 140 °C, 180 min of reaction time. 

 Time (min) Concentration (mg/L) 

0 999.9 

15 867.9 

30 477.4 

45 386.5 

60 307.5 

80 243.5 

100 153.2 

120 106.5 

150 36.4 

180 43.5 

The concentration-time curve can be fitted as shown in Figure 1. 

668



0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

200

400

600

800

1000
C

o
n

c
e
n

tr
a

ti
o
n

 (
m

g
/L

)

Time (min)

Figure 1: Reactant concentration curve and Polynomial fit 

The curve of synthesizing 1, 3-dimethylurea behaved a negative correlation with time. Extending experiment 

time would result in 100 % conversion but the speed of reaction rate decreased due to the cost of reactant. 

For this reason, it’s efficient and economically viable to study concentration distribution. Via fitted curves, Rate 

equation of the ammonolysis can be summed up as c(t) = 1016.24*e(-t/47.9403)+16.1935. The R2 value of 

Figure1 is 0.97489. According to the fitting equation, the calculated data as Table 2 indicates. 

Table 2: The concentration of reactant urea 

Time (min) value Concentration (mg/L) 

t1 10 900 

t2 20 700 

t3 30 500 

t4 60 300 

t5 120 100 

Effect of reaction temperature 

Rather than accelerating the reaction process, higher reaction temperature will bring about the side reactions, 

especially spontaneous polymerization and self-decomposition in the mixture. Melamine and other impurities 

can seriously influence the next reaction. These impurities exhibit different peaks and response times in HPLC 

spectra. Presence of impurities peaks in the result reveals the side reaction happened or not in the given 

concentration, which directly determines the stability. 

Figure 2: HPLC spectra of (a) reaction taking place at 140 °C, 30 min of reaction time and (b) samples were 

heated up to 170 °C, 30 min of reaction time 

669



Table 3: Concentration of substance in Figure 2 (a) and Figure 2 (b) 

Substance a (mg/L) B (mg/L) 

Urea 705.8 774.8 

Methylamine 78.6 47.5 

Dimethylurea 215.5 146.2 

Impurities 0 31.4 

High-performance liquid chromatography methods were performed to analyse the standard substance of urea, 

monomethylurea, and dimethyl urea. The response peak time of each standard substance was as follows: 

urea was 6.4 min; methylamine was 3.15 min and 1, 3-dimethylurea was 4.11 min. The samples in the 

reaction process were measured by HPLC methods, and the peak response time of each substance was 

consistent with the standard sample. The spectra of samples which prepared at 140 °C, 30min of reaction time, 

was shown in Figure 2 (a). It can be observed that the response peak time of impurities was 22 min, which 

was caused by side reaction as temperature rising from 140 to 170 °C. As shown in Table 2, the heating 

process accelerates self-decomposition side reaction (Sardeing et al., 2004), which leads to the decrease of 

product concentrations and the increase of reactant concentrations. Over-temperature leads to the self-

decomposition side reaction. Samples were heated up to the gradient temperature (140, 150, 160, 170, 180 

°C) with real-time detection.  

Table 4: Thermal stability temperature, Concentration of reactant urea, 140 – 170 °C, 125 min of reaction time 

Time(min) Concentration 

(mg/L) 

Temperature(°C) 

0 999.9 140 

10 887.2 150 

20 779.3 160 

30 470.5 170 

60 312.6 170 

120 169.8 180 

Figure 3: 3D diagram of thermal stability curve, concentration of reactant urea, 140 - 170°C, 125 min of 

reaction time 

The data indicates that thermal stability in the process of synthesizing 1,3-dimethylurea shows a negative 

correlation with the concentration of reactant urea, while a positive correlation with the reaction temperature. 

When temperature or concentration of reactant urea exceeded the limitation of thermal stability curve, side 

reaction can be initiated. For the above results, appropriate reaction time and suitable temperature condition 

can reduce side reactions. 

670



3.2 Thermodynamics 

Ammonolysis reaction of urea with methylamine to produce 1,3-dimethylurea and ammonia can be described 

by the reaction in Eq(1): 

3332322
NHNHCONHCHCHNHCHNCONHH ++ (1) 

Eq(1) can be simplified as follows: 

DCBA ++  (2) 

The rate of reaction for Eq(2) can be described mathematically as Eq(3): 

         dc
rev

ba

pos
DCkBAkdtAdrA −=−=− (3) 

-rA is the reaction rate; kpos and krev are reaction positive constant and reverse constant; [A] and [B] are the 

concentrations of reactants; [C] and [D] are the concentrations of products; Eq(3) can be simplified based on 

assumptions: (i) concentration of methylamine is constant due to the excess methylamine in the whole 

process (ii) the reverse and side reaction can be ignored due to the excessive methylamine (Saimon et al., 

2020). For the above reasons, [B]b can be assumed fixed and kpos[B]b can be symbolized k. The simplification 

as follow: 

   aAkdtAdrA =−=− (4) 

In order to investigate thermodynamics in the process of synthesizing 1, 3-dimethylurea, the pseudo-first-order 

model and the pseudo-second-order model were used to fit data (Figure 5). The R2 value of Figure 4(a) is 

0.87573; The R2 value of Figure 4(b) is 0.99468. There was an obvious linear correlation between the 

ln[cA/cA0] and the reaction time, which demonstrate that it’s better to use the pseudo-first-order model to 

describe the synthesizing process. [cA] is the concentration of while [cA0] is the initial concentration of reactant, 

the k value is 0.0163 min-1, a = 1. 

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

1
/c

A

contact time(min)

(a)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

ln
(c

A
/c

A
0
)

contact time(min)

(b)

Figure 4: Pseudo-Second-order model (a) and Pseudo-First-order model (b) to Fit Data at 150 °C, 200 min of 

reaction time. 

Parameters: Enthalpy of reaction H , Entropy of reaction S , Free energy of reaction G , Enthalpy of

products H
pro

 , Enthalpy of reactants Hrea , Entropy of products Spro , Entropy of reactants Srea , 

Stoichiometric coefficient of products iv  and reactants jv

STHG −= (5) 

 −= HvHvH reajproi (6) 

671



 −= SvSvS reajproi (7) 

Table 5: Enthalpy and Entropy in the process of synthesizing 1,3-dimethylurea 

Parameters H (kJ/mol) S (J/mol*K) 
urea 14.61 35.70 

methylamine 6.13 34.13 

ammonia 5.66 42.01 

dimethylurea 13.62 35.90 

According to Eq(6), Eq(7) and Eq(8), when the reaction temperature was 140 °C,Free energy of reaction can 

be obtained as -8.5148 J/mol. Enthalpy was -1.92 kJ/mol, Entropy was 15.96 J/mol*K. The obtained positive 

value of S and negative values of H and G revealed that reaction was an exothermic and spontaneous
process. Promptly separating can promote the reaction towards the increase of entropy. 

4. Conclusions

This study reveals that rate equation of the ammonolysis reaction can be summed up. Thermal stability in the 

process of synthesizing 1, 3-dimethylurea behaved a negative correlation with the reaction time. Over-

temperature would promote the self-decomposition side reaction. Investigations on thermal stability curve of 

synthesizing 1, 3-dimethylurea were conducted. When temperature and concentration of reactant exceeded 

the limitation of thermal stability curve, side reactions can be initiated. The curve can be used for not only 

obtaining stability information but also predicting suitable storage and reaction conditions. Kinetics studies 

showed that the reaction followed a pseudo-first-order kinetic model, and k value was 0.0163 min-1. 

Thermodynamics results indicate that the enthalpy was -1.92 kJ/mol, Gibbs free energy was -8.5148 J/mol, 

and entropy was 15.96 J/mol*K. The reaction was an exothermic, spontaneous and entropy increasing 

process. Thermal stability and thermodynamics study showed that promptly reaction time and suitable 

temperature condition can reduce side reactions to save energy and reduce the formation of pollutants. 

Acknowledgements 

The authors would like to thanks to Nature Science Foundation of Shandong Province for financial support as 

well as to Qingdao University of Science and Technology (Grant No: GG201809250363). 

References 

Aieta E.M., Roberts P.V., 1986, Application of mass-transfer theory to the kinetics of a fast gas-liquid reaction: 

chlorine hydrolysis, Environmental Science & Technology, 20(1), 44-50. 

Boutemak K., Taoualit N., Cheknane B., Laslouni O., Djeddou S., Medaoud K., Mazouni I., Aoudj S., 2019, 

Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic study of green malachite and rhoda-mine-b dyes sorption on olive 

po-mace, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 73, 277-282.  

Hoshino T., Mukaiyama T., Hoshino H., 1952, On the thermal dissociation of organic compounds. ii. the 

dissociation of the urea linkage in sym-dimethylurea, asym-dimethylurea and asym-phenylethylurea in 

butyric acid, Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 25(6), 392-395. 

Koyuncu I., Topacik D., Turan M., 2001, Application of the membrane technology to control ammonia in 

surface water, Water Science & Technology, 1(1), 117-125. 

Novaes L.D.R., Resende N.S.D., Salim V.M.M., Secchi A.R., 2017, Modeling, simulation and kinetic 

parameter estimation for diesel hydrotreating, Fuel, 209, 184-193. 

Sardeing R., Aubin J., Poux M., Xuereb C., 2004, Gas-liquid mass transfer: influence of sparger location, 

Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 82(9), 1161-1168. 

Saimon N.N., Jusoh M., Ngadi N., Zakaria Z.Y., 2020, Kinetic study of esterification of palm fatty acid distillate 

using sulfonated glucose prepared via microwave-assisted heating method, Chemical Engineering 

Transactions, 78, 403-408. 

Skuches G.S., Carleton P.S., 1984, Correlation of urea structure with thermal stability in model compounds, 

Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 29(11), 3431-3443. 

Shigeru M., Makoto S., lsamu K., Akira S., Masayuki M., 1978, Synthesis of N,N' -Dimethylurea from 

Monomethylamine, Bulletin of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University, 29(1), 75-88. 

672