Microsoft Word - 6Fornaro.docx


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                 DOI: 10.3303/CET2185033 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Paper Received: 20 December 2020; Revised: 1 March 2021; Accepted: 7 April 2021 
Please cite this article as: Cariou S., Mazian B., Fanlo J.-L., Chaignaud M., Bergeret A., Malhautier L., 2021, Identification of Vocs Responsible 
of Odour During Field Retting of Hemp Stems, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 85, 193-198  DOI:10.3303/CET2185033 
  

 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS  
 

VOL. 85, 2021 

A publication of 

 
The Italian Association 

of Chemical Engineering 
Online at www.cetjournal.it 

Guest Editors: Selena Sironi, Laura Capelli 
Copyright © 2021, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 
ISBN 978-88-95608-83-9; ISSN 2283-9216 

Identification of VOCs Responsible of Odour during Field 
Retting of Hemp Stems 

Stephane Carioua, Brahim Maziana,b, Jean-Louis Fanloa,c, Mathilde Chaignaudc, 
Anne Bergeretb, Luc Malhautiera 
a
 Laboratoire des Sciences des Risques (LSR), IMT Mines Ales, 6 avenue de Clavieres, 30319, Ales Cedex, France 

b
 Polymers Composites and Hybrids (PCH), IMT Mines Ales, 6 avenue de Clavieres, 30319, Ales Cedex, France  

c
 Olentica sas ,14 boulevard Charles Peguy, 30100 Alès 

stephane.cariou@mines-ales.fr  

Incorporation of natural fibres into polymers to manufacture biocomposites is a way of limiting the 
environmental impact of these materials. However, the fibres quality is essential to fulfil their assigned role as 
reinforcement in biocomposites. The extraction of fibres from hemp stems requires a retting step. Retting is a 
bioprocess applied to plant stems to easily separate fibres from the central woody part. Nowadays, this 
process is carried out directly on the field in an empirically way due to its dependence on environmental 
conditions which could cause problems of the inconsistency of the hemp fibres quality.  
During few weeks of retting, odours are generated by the degradation of plant material by microorganisms. 
The modification of these odours can be correlated with the progress of the retting degree of hemp stems. 
This change in odour is obviously combined with a change in the type and quantity of VOCs emitted. 
Identifying odours and VOCs emitted when the retting is optimal can lead to make sensors able to survey the 
progress of this biological process. Then, if this process is well controlled, much higher quality with more 
uniform fibres could be produced. 
This article will focus on the identification of the odour emitted when the optimal retting of the stems is reached 
as well as the identification of the VOCs analysed at this stage. 

1. Introduction 
The increasing depletion of fossil energy resources is forcing people to define alternative strategies to limit the 
use of these non-renewable resources by promoting the development of renewable resources while ensuring 
the protection of the environment. The use of hemp fibres is among of responses of this issues. Indeed, hemp 
fibres have specific mechanical properties (ratio between the mechanical properties and the density (Aziz & 
Ansell, 2004)) identical to those of glass fibres commonly used for the reinforcement of composite materials 
(Joshi et al., 2004). Hemp fibres are obtained after various steps transformations. The retting process is one of 
these steps which allow separating lignocellulosic fibres from plant stems. This process consists in the 
degradation of natural cements (pectins and waxes) which constitute the gummy resinous material in which 
the fibre bundles of stems plants are contained (Pakarinen et al., 2012). The fibres quality obtained depends 
on this stage, and therefore, controlling retting treatment is a crucial step for high performances hemp fibre 
(Mazian et al., 2018).  
Many VOCs compounds are naturally emitted by the hemp plant (Cannabis sativa L) as terpenes, alcohols, 
aldehydes (Turner et al. 1980; El Sohly and Slade 2005). Depending on the plant hemp situation during 
growth and retting, emitted VOCs would differ. Some of them are odorous; therefore the resulting odour must 
be different as well. Thus, following these gaseous emissions and odours would give some data about the 
retting-degrees progress. 
Historically, to identify molecules at the odours origin, only a physico-chemical analysis was carried out 
coupled with an expertise on the potentiality of molecules to generate an odour. Then, the approach by 
calculation of odour activities has been developed (Anet et al., 2013; Kamarulzaman et al., 2019; Parker et al., 

193



2013; Sivret et al., 2016). However, due to certain biases (precision of physico-chemical quantification, 
unavailability of perception thresholds, and uncertainty of existing data) (Cariou et al., 2016), the identification 
of the molecules causing odours was still incomplete. To remedy this shortcoming, this paper proposes to 
complete the odour activity value approach by a search for a relationship between the different odour notes 
perceived by the evaluators and the individual odour qualities of the molecules identified previously.  

2. Materials and methods 
2.1 Hemp cultivation and sampling 

Hemp plants (cannabis sativa L., Cultivar ‘Santhica 27’) were cultivated in south of France near to Alès and 
harvested at the seed maturity (26th September, 2017). Retting was conducted on the field during nine weeks. 
Regularly, hemp stems were collected (each week until week 7 and then two weeks later at the end of the 
retting period). At each sampling time, 100g of stems was introduced in a Nalophan© bags. This bag was then 
filled with 40L of dry compressed air and let in a room with stable thermal conditions until stabilization, 
reached after three days of waiting. 

2.2 Physico-chemical and olfactometric analyses 

Physico-chemical analyses by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and odour 
concentration analyses were conducted according the protocol described in Mazian et al. (2019). The best 
possible quantification is realized for each compound: if the compound was used as standard the real 
concentration is calculated if not, the mean of standard for each family is used to quantify the compound.  
Odour concentration is measured according the EN 13725 (2003). 
Odour quality is evaluated according a non-oriented method developed by LSR and Olentica and presented in 
Medjkoune (2018). 

2.3 Determination of VOCs responsible of odours 

VOCs responsible of odour during the retting process are identified by calculating odour activity values (OAV) 
for all the identified compounds (Cariou et al., 2016). 
 =  

 : Odor Activity Value of compound i (dimensionless) 
 : Chemical concentration of compound i (mg.m-3) 

 : Odor Detection Threshold of compound i (mg.m-3) 
 
Odour detection thresholds (ODT) are not available for all compounds. So, if the ODT was measured in the 
laboratory, the value is used to calculate OAV. If an individual ODT is referenced in the literature ((Van 
Gemert, 2011), the geometric mean of all values for the compound is used and if no ODT is available, the 
geometric mean of all ODT of the compound chemical family is used to estimate an individual ODT.    
Then, the sum of all the odour activity values is compared with odour concentration. If the two values are in 
the same order of magnitude, all the molecules responsible of odours are considered in our opinion. To 
confirm this hypothesis, the odour quality obtained with our method is compared with individual quality of 
identified molecules. If all the olfactory notes are recovered by the individual odour qualities of the different 
molecules identified then the method is considered valid. If not, odour quality of molecules with an OAV<1 is 
checked.  

3. Results 
3.1 Odour concentration versus sum of odour activity value 

Table 1 displays the comparison between the sum of OAV and odour concentration measured by olfactometry 
according the EN13725 standard.  

Table 1: evolution of calculated OAV sum and measured odour concentration 

 W0 W1 W2 W3 W4 W6 W9 
OAV Sum 2201 1724 726 426 120 170 124 
Odour concentration (UOE/m

3) 1467 770 358 564 253 396 86 
 

194



As a first approach, the OAV sum is in the same order of magnitude that the odour concentration measured. 
Moreover, a correlation factor of 0.91 is obtained between the two data sets. Therefore, it can be concluded 
that all major molecules responsible of odour are identified by our approach. 
Considering the evolution of odour concentration over the nine-weeks of retting period, a clear decrease can 
be observed. Indeed, the odour concentration is around 1500 UOE/m

3 at the beginning of the retting process 
and then falls by a factor 5 and stabilizes from week 4. 

3.2 Evolution of individual odour activity value 

Table 2 shows the evolution of odour activity values for all the molecules with an OAV upper than 1 on the 
nine weeks of retting. 

Table 2: Evolution of individual OAV during retting process 

CAS Nom W0 W1 W2 W3 W4 W6 W9 
431-03-8 2,3-butanedione 998 1054 480 272 86 140 99 
470-82-6 eucalyptol 468 84 74 33 10 8 4 
80-56-8 alpha-pinene 273 40 32 16 6 11 14 
590-86-3 3-methylbutanal 152 325 78 77 8 1 2 
66-25-1 hexanal 81 43 17 9 5 6 1 
96-17-3 2-methylbutanal 80 122 23 8 1 0 0 
75-18-3 dimethylsulfide 49 12 0 0 0 0 0 
75-07-0 acetaldehyde 43 5 4 1 1 1 0 

79-31-2 
2-methylpropanoïc 
acid 18 13 10 4 4 3 2 

64-17-5 ethanol 13 4 1 1 0 0 1 
78-84-2 2-methylpropanal 12 12 3 2 0 0 0 
110-62-3 pentanal 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 
123-38-6 propanal 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 
26882-03-1 α-Campholenal 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 
123-51-3 3-methyl-1-butanol 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 

 
At the seed maturity of hemp and at the beginning of the retting process (W0), TD-GC-MS analysis leads to 
identify 69 VOCs belonging to eleven different chemical families more or less odorous as presented in 
(Mazian et al., 2019).  
When calculating OAV, only fifteen VOCs seem to have an impact on odour (Table 2). First, 2,3-butanedione, 
eucalyptol and alpha-pinene represent almost 80% of OAV sum at the beginning of the retting process (W0). 
Then, 2,3-butanedione is the biggest contributor to the OAV sum during the nine weeks of the process but an 
increase of the percentage of 3-methyl butanal and 2-methyl butanal instead of eucalyptol and alpha-pinene 
modify the odour quality from week one to week three.  
At week four, six and nine, the molecules responsible of odour are at very low level and stable and should 
generate a stable odour quality. 

3.3 Evolution of odour quality 

Figure 1 shows the evolution of odour quality description from during retting treatment.  
On the day of the harvest (W0), the odour is described with a predominantly green vegetal note and a 
secondary note of dry plant. It is to be noted the presence of a sweet note for all samples but at a very low 
level. 
As the retting process progresses, the green plant notes disappear and the smell of dried plant becomes 
predominant. A note of fermentation also appears during the following weeks. 
At week 9, it is important to note that the sweet note becomes the second most intense note. 
All the other minor notes (pungent, fresh, woody, musty, humus and mushroom) appear only once or twice in 
the descriptor of the evaluators.  
 
 

195



 

 

 

 
Figure 1 The evolution of odour quality description from during retting treatment.  

196



4. Discussion 
The most important olfactory notes to explain are therefore those of green plant, dried plants, fermentation 
and sweetness. A database (The good scents company) is used to identify the odour quality associated with 
each molecule. 
When looking at the molecules identified with the OAV calculation (table 2), many of them are described in the 
literature by a green note. In our case, eucalyptol, alpha-pinene and hexanal can explained the odour 
perceived by the evaluators. This note, well perceived at week 0 is correlated with the importance of OAV for 
these molecules. Until week 2, their OAV decreased and the evaluators described this note less and less. 
The presence of 3-methyl butanal, 2-methyl butanal, hexanal and pentanal is responsible of the fermentation 
note. These compounds have a real impact on odours perceived at week 1, 2 and 3. 
The sweet note can only be explained by the presence of 2,3-butanedione in the gaseous emissions of the 
retting process. This molecule is present all along the process with an impact that increases with the 
disappearance of other important molecules.  
Other minor notes can also be explained by the presence of identified molecules 

• Pungent: acetaldehyde, 2-methylpropanoic acid, 2-methyl propanal 
• Musty: 2-methyl butanal, propanal 
• Woody : propanal 

But a major note, the dry vegetal one, is not correlated with any molecule with an OAV upper than 1 (table 2). 
If we considered the other molecules identified but without an OAV upper than 1, Beta-pinene is described in 
literature with an odour of hay in some case, so it might explain the dry vegetal note identified by jury 
members. In our analyses, beta-pinene never appears with an OAV upper than one; a bad quantification due 
to a calibration not made with this molecule or the use of a wrong odour detection threshold may lead to a 
misidentification of VOCs responsible of odour. The approach conducts in this paper add a new validation of 
VOCs identification with a first step with the OAV calculation and a confirmation with the search for correlation 
between the olfactory notes and the identified molecules.  

5. Conclusions 
Odours generated by retting treatment evolve regularly during nine weeks studied both in terms of 
concentration and quality. From green vegetal, the dominant note at the beginning, the odour evolves towards 
a note of dried vegetal with minor notes of fermentation and sweetness. This evolution is correlated with the 
modification of gaseous emissions. From a majority of terpenes, the VOCs emitted evolve to aldehydes and 
alcohols. This modification is the result of biodegradation of hemp stems.  
The approach developed in this paper brings an additional brick in the methods of identification of VOCs at the 
origin of odours. Some points still need to be improved; for example, quantification in physico-chemical 
analyses and odour detection threshold accuracy are important to obtain the more accurate OAV and finally 
the most detailed identification. 
In addition, the database of molecule odour qualities found in the literature is very incomplete. Indeed, besides 
the missing data, the quality of an odour is dependent on its concentration, which the available data do not 
provide, leading to difficult interpretations. 

Reference 

Anet, B., Lemasle, M., Couriol, C., Lendormi, T., Amrane, A., Le Cloirec, P., Cogny, G., & Fillières, R. (2013). 
Characterization of gaseous odorous emissions from a rendering plant by GC/MS and treatment by 
biofiltration. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 981‑987. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.028 

Aziz, S. H., & Ansell, M. P. (2004). The effect of alkalization and fibre alignment on the mechanical and 
thermal properties of kenaf and hemp bast fibre composites : Part 1 – polyester resin matrix. Composites 
Science and Technology, 64(9), 1219‑1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.001 

Cariou, S., Chaignaud, M., Montreer, P., Fages, M., & Fanlo, J.-L. (2016). Odor concentration prediction by 
gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS) : Importance of VOCs quantification and odor 
detection threshold accuracy. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 54, 67‑72. 
https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1654012 

EN 13725, Air Quality – Determination of odor concentration by dynamic olfactometry, AFNOR, 2003. 
Joshi, S. V., Drzal, L. T., Mohanty, A. K., & Arora, S. (2004). Are natural fiber composites environmentally 

superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 
35(3), 371‑376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 

197



Kamarulzaman, N. H., Le-Minh, N., Fisher, R. M., & Stuetz, R. M. (2019). Quantification of VOCs and the 
development of odour wheels for rubber processing. Science of The Total Environment, 657, 154‑168. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.451 

Mazian, B., Bergeret, A., Benezet, J. C., & Malhautier, L. (2018). Influence of field retting duration on the 
biochemical, microstructural, thermal and mechanical properties of hemp fibres harvested at the beginning 
of flowering. Industrial Crops and Products, 116(November 2017), 170‑181. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.062 

Mazian, B., Cariou, S., Chaignaud, M., Fanlo, J.-L., Fauconnier, M.-L., Bergeret, A., & Malhautier, L. (2019). 
Evolution of temporal dynamic of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and odors of hemp stem during field 
retting. Planta, 250(6), 1983‑1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-019-03280-6 

Medjkoune, M. (2018). Vers une approche non orientée pour l’évaluation de la qualité des odeurs [Phdthesis, 
Université Montpellier]. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01866751 

Pakarinen, A., Zhang, J., Brock, T., Maijala, P., & Viikari, L. (2012). Enzymatic accessibility of fiber hemp is 
enhanced by enzymatic or chemical removal of pectin. Bioresource Technology, 107, 275‑281. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.101 

Parker, D. B., Gilley, J., Woodbury, B., Kim, K. H., Galvin, G., Bartelt-Hunt, S. L., Li, X., & Snow, D. D. (2013). 
Odorous VOC emission following land application of swine manure slurry. Atmospheric Environment, 66, 
91‑100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.001 

Sivret, E. C., Wang, B., Parcsi, G., & Stuetz, R. M. (2016). Prioritisation of odorants emitted from sewers using 
odour activity values. Water Research, 88, 308‑321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.10.020 

The Good Scents Company. (2020). The Good Scents Company. http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/. 
Accessed on 04/15/2020 

Van Gemert, L. J. (2011). Odour thresholds. Compilations of odour threshold values in air, water and other 
media (second enlarged and revised edition). Oliemans Punter & Partners BV PO Box 14167 3508 SG  
Utrecht The Netherlands www.opp.nl. 

 
 
 
  
 

198