CETvol87


 
 

 

                                                                    DOI: 10.3303/CET2187054 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Paper Received: 9 September 2020; Revised: 8 March 2021; Accepted: 14 April 2021 
Please cite this article as: Monteiro C.C., Sarache G., Januario J.G., Berwig K.P., Raniero G.Z., Monteiro A.R., Moreira da Silva F., 2021, 
Biopolymer Based on Brewing Waste and Extruded Maize: Characterization and Application, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 87, 319-324  
DOI:10.3303/CET2187054 

 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS 
VOL. 87, 2021 

A publication of 

The Italian Association 
of Chemical Engineering 
Online at www.cetjournal.it 

Guest Editors: Laura Piazza, Mauro Moresi, Francesco Donsì
Copyright © 2021, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 
ISBN 978-88-95608-85-3; ISSN 2283-9216

Biopolymer Based on Brewing Waste and Extruded Maize: 
Characterization and Application 

Claudia C. F. Monteiroa,*, Gabriel Saracheb, Jaqueline G. B. Januáriob, Kimberli P. 
Berwigc, Ghiovani Z. Ranieroc, Antonio R. G. Monteiroc, Fernando Moreira da 
Silvad 
a
Department of Design, Universidade Estadual de Maringa (Brazil) 

b
Department of Food Engineering, Universidade Estadual de Maringa (Brazil) 

c
Post graduation program in Food Science, Universidade Estadual de Maringa (Brazil) 

d
Faculdade de Arquitectura of Arcteture, Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal) 

ccfmonteiro@uem.br 

The brewing industry produces more than 100 billion litres a year worldwide and consequently more than 20 
million ton of solid waste. This waste is mostly destined for animal feed; however, it ends up being a form of 
disposal of low added value. On the other hand, furniture and decorations items of a bar can use such waste 
for its confection, which adds value to the waste and mentions the own beer. This work aimed to develop and 
characterize a biopolymer obtained from the brewing residue (milled malt after mashing process) and extruded 
maize to be used as a raw material for furniture and in architectural wall coverings. The proportions of 
components, time and temperature of the drying process and malt milling were variated in nine treatments. 
The wood chipboard was used as a control as well. Tensile strength, young's modulus, and elongation at 
break were analysed, water absorption index (WAI) and water solubility index (WSI) were determined, and the 
colour was evaluated. After the material was characterised, the better mixtures were applied to make a board 
used in furniture and wall coverings. The sensorial analysis (visual) was made with 117 non trained panellists 
to evaluate the new material's acceptance to replace wood-based boards. The main results showed that lower 
drying temperature, as well as the higher amount of extruded maize, could increase the resistance of the 
material. There is no significant evidence that particle size affects the material's resistance; on the other hand, 
it was essential to increase the material acceptability, the smaller was particle size, the better was the 
acceptance as a substitute of wood-based boards. It was possible to conclude that the material has high 
acceptance and adequate physical properties to be used in some furniture and covering walls. It is an 
excellent alternative to increase the value of this industrial waste. 

1. Introduction

Plastics are unique materials that fulfil a wide range of functions in society but harm the environment by 
consuming resources (Wang and Wang, 2017). According to Rutiaga et al. (2005), conventional plastics are 
obtained from synthetic polymers derived from petroleum and, for this reason, constitute an environmental 
problem because their high stability can result in more than 100 years of degradation. The higher the global 
plastic production level, the greater the CO2 and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this context, there are 
several initiatives to minimise this problem, such as the one undertaken by the United Nations (UN), which has 
sought to motivate the implementation of ecologically correct methods in all countries of the world (Oktavilia et 
al., 2020). 
Technologies have been applied to reuse agro-industrial by-products and, thereby, reduce their disposal, 
adding value, and minimising environmental impacts (Saraiva et al., 2019). Cereal-based by-products can be 
applied in the production of bio-based materials, for example, bio-based polyethene (bio-PE), bio-based 
polyethene terephthalate (bio-PET), bio-based polyurethane (bio-PUR), polylactic acid (PLA), modified starch, 
cellulose derivatives and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA). These compounds have high added value and 

319



transversal application in the industry, following a circular economy approach and minimal or zero waste 
generation (Skendi et al., 2020). 
Beer is a beverage widely consumed worldwide, made from water, malt, hops and yeast as primary 
ingredients. The leading global countries in beer production are China, the United States and Brazil. According 
to the Statistics Portal, beer production has increased in recent years, from 130 billion litres in 1998 to 191 
billion litres in 2019 (STATISTA, 2020). Consequently, the waste generated by the brewing industry also 
increased. The production of beer is characterised by a process that generates many residues (among them, 
malt cake, brewer's yeast and trub), which have characteristics that make it possible, in many cases, to be 
reused in other industrial processes (Marsarioli, 2019). In the last few decades, there has been a large 
increase in the number of micro-breweries globally, adding value to the product. However, the waste from 
these small factories generally does not have a correct destination, since as they are not large volumes in 
each factory, there is usually no economic interest in this waste, so solutions for the disposal of this waste on 
a smaller scale can be useful to reduce the environmental impact of this growing industrial sector and at the 
same time add value to manufacturers (Monteiro et al., 2019). 
The efficient management of these by-products aims to limit environmental pollution caused by their 
elimination and make these by-products useful. Disposing of waste in an environmentally sustainable manner 
is a critical challenge, with the development of viable processes for using or valorising brewery waste 
(Rachwal et al., 2020). Some works have been using beer residues mixed with synthetic or natural resins to 
produce biodegradable materials. However, these resins have a considerable environmental impact as well as 
a high cost. On the other hand, corn is a source of starch, natural, cheap, renewable, and biodegradable, is an 
attractive combination of availability and price. Thus, it is an excellent candidate to produce biodegradable 
materials.  
However, to obtain a material using starch, it is necessary to employ techniques to destroy the original 
semicrystalline structure of its granules, which can be done by a combination of mechanical and thermal 
energy. The resulting material is biodegradable and fully decomposable into non-toxic waste (Schlemmer et 
al., 2014). Thus, maize must undergo an extrusion process for its pre-gelatinisation and thus act as a binding 
agent in the material. From different sources, starch can be mixed, kept intact, used in various resins as filler 
or melted to mix compounds. According to Justin et al. (2017), the extruded maize is made in a highly efficient 
and low-cost material and energy consumptions. 
Thermoplastic starch or plasticised starch offers an exciting alternative to synthetic polymers in specific 
applications (Vroman and Tighzert, 2009). Significant research is carried out to develop a new class of totally 
biodegradable "green" composites called biocomposites (Netravali and Chabba, 2003). Starch can be used as 
a biodegradable polymeric compound. Degradation occurs by hydrolysis in the acetal bond by enzymes. 
Amylases attack the α-1,4 bond while glycosidases attack the α-1,6 bond. Degradation products are non-toxic 
(Vroman and Tighzert, 2009). 
The traditional industrial production model (extraction, production, consumption and waste) has proved 
unsustainable in the context of the current market, of technology, of the quest for conscious production. The 
new way of thinking about production fits the circular economy concept, which proposes a behavioural change 
in the way of consuming and using natural resources and waste. Important actions in this circular economy 
scenario are the change in product design and consumption, in the process of raw materials and waste 
exploitation and the conflicting action between environmental sustainability and economic growth (Cosenza, 
2020).  
The production of materials with the addition of industrial residues and reducing the environmental impacts 
caused by the plastic industry and its chain can contribute significantly and add value and reduce these 
industries' environmental impact. Therefore, this work aimed to develop and characterize a material produced 
with beer residue and extruded maize.  

2. Material and methods

2.1 Materials 

To obtain ground and standardised beer residue, the used malt residue was supplied by a small local brewery 
(Maringá, PR, Brazil). After the mashing process of a pure malt lager, the resulting residue was immediately 
dried in an oven at 70 °C with air circulation for 48 hours, the grinding was done in a hammer mill and 
separated into three different granulometry (3.5-6, 6-14, 14-28 mash) and later stored in polypropylene bags 
until the moment of use. 
Corn grits, used to obtain the milled corn extrudate, were provided by Nutrimilho (Maringá, PR, Brazil) and 
extruded according to Monteiro et al. (2016) using IMBRA RX50 single screw equipment (INBRAMAQ, 
Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil) with 50 mm diameter and 200 mm length. The die plate had two holes of 3 mm 
diameter, and extrusion parameters were 20 A of motor amperage, a feed rate of 12 g.s-1 and a screw speed 

320



of 90 rpm. After the extrusion, the extrudates were ground, and the 60-80 mesh fraction was separated and 
later stored in polypropylene bags until use. 

2.2 Material production process 

To prepare the biomaterial, beer residues were mixed with the extruded ground corn in the proportions and 
granulometry shown in Table 1. Experimental design of material production, with 25 g of distilled water was 
added and homogenised manually until a uniform mixture was obtained. Subsequently, the mixture was added 
in a metallic tray 15 cm in diameter and pressed by a hydraulic press at 7 ton, and it results in a 40 kg/cm2 
pressure for 300 seconds. The materials were then transferred to greenhouses at the respective temperatures 
provided in the experimental design (next section) for 24 hours. Finally, the samples were conditioned in a 
dryer for 48 hours before analysis.  

2.2.1 Experimental design 

The proportions of components, the temperature of the drying process and particle size of waste malt milled 
were variated in eight treatments. It was made a central point in triplicate. Table 1 shows the experimental 
design of material production.  

Table 1: Experimental design of the material production process 

Treatment Malt waste (g) Extruded maize (g) Dry temperature (ºC) Particle size of malt waste (mash)
T1 55 45 45 14-28 
T2 55 45 45 3,5 – 6 
T3 55 45 105 14-28 
T4 55 45 105 3,5 – 6 
T5 85 15 45 14-28 
T6 85 15 45 3,5 – 6 
T7 85 15 105 14-28 
T8 85 15 105 3,5 – 6 
T9 70 30 75 6 – 14 

2.3 Material characterization 

For the material characterisation, the sample was cut into specimens with 10 x 100 mm dimensions. 

2.3.1 Density 

Specimen’s thickness was determined using a digital micrometre (0.001 mm resolution, Mitutoyo, Japan). Five 
points of each specimen area were evaluated, and the volume was calculated using the average thickness 
with specimen dimension. The mass of specimens was evaluated in an analytical balance. 

2.3.2 Tensile strength 
The mechanical resistance was analysed using a Universal testing machine (model DL1000, EMIC, São José 
dos Pinhais, Brazil). Each sample was loaded by 100 kgf at 1 mm*s-1, with probe angled at 135° and analysed 
according to ASTM D1037-12 (ASTM, 2012), with some modifications. 

2.3.3 Water absorption index (WAI) 

The Water Absorption Index of the samples was evaluated according to Ayrilmis et al. (2009) with 
modifications made by Monteiro (2019). To evaluate WAI, the specimens were dipped in water, fast dried, and 
weighed (initial weight), immersed in distilled water (30:1 water/sample w/w) for 24 h at 25 °C, fast dried again 
and weight (final weight). The WAI is calculating by the division of final weight by initial weight. The tests were 
conducted in triplicate. 

2.3.4 Colour 

Colour was evaluated using a Minolta Chroma Meter CR‐400 colourimeter with D65 illuminate as the 
reference, with readings in three-point each sample for each treatment. Results were expressed by the 
CIELAB system, with values of L*, a* and b* whose L* values. The nine treatments were evaluated. 

2.3.5 Acceptance 

The materials' acceptability test was made in a virtual environment by 117 untrained testers (37 male and 80 
females from 18 to 48 years old, mean 28 years old). The samples were photographed in a 56 Megapixels 

321



camera to make the appearance evaluation. All eight samples and three repetitions of the central point were 
presented, coded with random numbers. To evaluate appearance's overall acceptability, the 11-point 
structured hedonic scale was used, where 0 represented the minimum score 'disliked extremely' and 10, the 
maximum score 'liked extremely'. The Research Ethics Committee approved these tests of the State 
University of Maringa (CAAE 18718013.3.0000.0104). 

2.3.6. Statistical analysis 

All data were treated statistically from the analysis of variance (ANOVA) with subsequent analysis of the 
Tukey tests' means at 5 % probability and correlation test. The statistical tests were made using software 
Sisvar 5.6 (Ferreira, 2011). 

3. Results and discussion

Table 2 presents the results obtained for density, mechanical resistance, and water resistance (WAI). The 
results obtained for density and mechanical resistance show a significant correlation (Pearson, p-value=0.00) 
between them (r=0.76). In this way, it is possible to affirm that the increase in density contributed positively to 
the increase in resistance. However, it was not the only aspect that defined the resistance. 

Table 2: Physical properties of the material 

Treatment Particle size of 
malt waste (mash) 

Density (g.mL) Mechanical resistance (Kgf) WAI 

T1 14-28 0.89ab 21.95b 2.69a 
T2 3,5 – 6 0.94a 27.32a un 
T3 14-28 0.85b 14.05c 1.64c 
T4 3,5 – 6 0.72d 10.15d un 
T5 14-28 0.82bc 5.37e 2.97a 
T6 3,5 – 6 0.78c 10.75d un 
T7 14-28 0.83bc 6.37e 2.18b 
T8 3,5 – 6 0.65e 4.14e un 
T91 6 – 14 0.79

c 10.81d un 
T92 6 – 14 0.82

bc 10.13d un 
T93 6 – 14 0.83

bc 10.67d un 

Means with different letters in the same column are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).
un – undetermined (the sample was completely dissolved) 

Based on the statistical analysis of the data, it was possible to identify that the granulometry of the raw 
material was not an important factor for increasing the resistance of the material, which differ from the work of 
Mikalouski et al. (2014) which reported an influence of the granulometry in the expansion index of the 
samples. On the other hand, the increase in extruded maize in the mixture has contributed positively to the 
increase in the material's resistance. 
Water absorption was not evaluated for seven samples because they were completely dissolved. For the other 
four samples, the values are too high indicating that the material is not suitable for water-resistant functions. 
Compared with the results found by Monteiro et al. (2019), the results are lower. Low water resistance is a 
disadvantage compared to more resistant materials; however, this can be easily solved using a sealant to be 
applied to the material after its production, if it requires waterproof resistance. 
Table 3 presents the results of the material appearance analysis. The colour tests showed that the malt 
residue's granulometry had little influence on colour. On the other hand, the increase of the proportion of 
extruded corn in the mixture, as expected, increased the intensity of yellow in the sample. The drying 
temperature was the factor that most interfered in the sample's staining, especially the samples that dried at 
105 °C, as can also be seen in Figure 1. Figure 1 shows the appearance of the materials obtained in the eight 
treatments, as well as the repetitions at the central point (T9). 

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9

Figure 1: Appearance of material 

322



It was not possible to establish a relationship between the samples' instrumental colour parameters and 
sensorial acceptance. By the sensorial acceptance of appearance, the materials produced with finer 
granulometry (14/28) had significantly higher acceptance then the thicker granulometry (3.5 – 6). The drying 
temperature also exerted influence in the evaluation of appearance. 

Table 3: Appearance of material 

Treatment Colour Sensorial acceptance 

L a b 
T1 50.34 (1.74) 2.36 (0.26) 24.78 (0.19) 7.16ab 
T2 53.03 (2.71) 0.73 (0.23) 26.24 (1.86) 4.99c 
T3 41.17 (0.94) 5.90 (0.76) 22.65 (0.32) 7.39a 
T4 39.33 (0.78) 6.78 (0.59) 22.48 (1.56) 6.35b 
T5 53.39 (1.55) 3.01 (0.46) 24.84 (0.07) 7.25ab 
T6 53.58 (1.79) 1.29 (0.17) 24.34 (1.54) 5.89b 
T7 41.25 (1.57) 6.72 (0.35) 23.49 (1.01) 7.83a 
T8 40.92 (2.60) 7.47 (0.60) 25.41 (1.13) 7.01ab 
T91 52.75 (1.06) 1.28 (0.42) 24.41 (1.96) 5.76

bc 
T92 53.88 (1.76) 0.85 (0.33) 24.29 (0.87) 6.02

b 
T93 55.46 (1.55) 1.14 (0.11) 25.00 (1.55) 6.23

b 

Means with different letters in the same column are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).

Although the T2 treatment had the best mechanical resistance, this treatment resulted in the worst acceptance 
of appearance. However, the T1 sample, the second-best in mechanical resistance was also one of the best 
samples in the appearance attribution. Thus, T1 and T3 samples' resistance can be considered adequate 
simultaneously as these treatments provide good sensory acceptance of appearance. 
The resistance of the materials produced in the T1, T2 and T3 treatments were significantly lower than those 
found by Monteiro et al. (2019) up to 80.9 Kgf in the samples and 61.9 in the Medium Density Fiberboard 
(MDF). However, the resistance is sufficient for the elaboration of some furniture and utensils that do not 
require high mechanical resistance and application in wall coatings. 
The low variability presented in the treatments T91 to T93 indicated the material's high reproducibility, and 
even in the sensorial acceptance analysis, the values were within the same confidence interval. 

4. Conclusions

Based on the results presented, the treatments with 55 % malt residue and 45 % extruded corn with more 
acceptable grain size (14/28) showed good performance both in resistance and in sensorial acceptance in 
appearance attribute. Thus, the sample T1 presented the best process parameters within the studied range, 
resulting in a material with desirable characteristics. Although the material has a lower resistance than 
materials in which the waste is mixed with resins, this resistance is sufficient for several applications. The 
great advantage is represented by the much lower environmental impact than materials with resins as binding 
agents.  
So, this work showed that it is possible to produce a low-cost material, totally biodegradable, and could be 
applied, in further research, to the construction of various utensils and architectural coatings. 

Acknowledgements 

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from Brazilian National Council for Scientific and 
Technological Development (CNPq) through the research project 303597/2018-6, the Portuguese Foundation 
for Science and Technology (FCT), Research Centre for Architecture, Urbanism and Design (CiAUD) Faculty 
of Architecture, University of Lisbon (FA/ULisboa) and Fundação Araucária de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento 
Científico e Tecnológico do Paraná (FA). 

References 

Ayrilmis N., Buyuksari U., Avci E., Koc, E., 2009, Utilization of pine (Pinus pinea L.) cone in manufacture of 
wood based composite, Forest Ecology and Management, 259 (1), 65–70. 

ASTM, 2012, D1037-12, Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-base fiber and particle panel 
materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. 

323



Cosenza, J.P., De Andrade, E.M., De Assunção, G.M., 2020, A circular economy as an alternative for Brazil's 
sustainable growth: Analysis of the national solid waste policy, Rev. Gest. Ambiente e Sustentabilidade, 9, 
1, 1–30.  

Ferreira, D.F., 2011, Sisvar: a guide for its bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons, Ciência e 
Agrotecnologia, 38, 2, 109-112. 

Justen, A.P. Souza, M. L. R.  Monteiro, A. R. G.  Mikcha, J. M. G. Gasparino, E. Delbem, A. B. Carvalho, M. 
R. B. Vesco, A. P. D. 2017 Preparation of Extruded Snacks with Flavored Flour Obtained from the 
Carcasses of Nile Tilapia: Physicochemical, Sensory, and Microbiological Analysis, Journal of Aquatic 
Food Product Technology, 26:3, 258-266, DOI: 10.1080/10498850.2015.1136718 

Marsarioli, M., 2019, Identificação e avaliação de geração de resíduos em processo de produção de cerveja 
em microcervejaria e proposição de reutilização, Masters Dissertation, Universidade do Vale do Taquari 
(UNIVATES), Lajeado, Brazil, <www.univates.br/bdu/bitstream/10737/2627/1/2019MauricioMarsarioli.pdf>. 

Mikalouski, F.B. da S., Monteiro, A.R.G., Marques, D.R., Monteiro, C.C F., Benossi, L., 2014, Influence of raw 
material particle size on the expansion of extruded corn, Brazilian Journal of Food Technology, 17, 1, 28–
32.  

Monteiro A.R.G., Marques, D.R., Marchi, L.B., Chinellato, M.M., Berwig, K.P., Wolf, B., 2016, Eliminating the 
use of fat in the production of extruded snacks by applying starch coating, Chemical Engineering 
Transactions, 49, 625-630.  

Monteiro, C.C.F., Malavazi, B., Mendes, M.P., Berwig, K.P., Raniero, G.Z., Monteiro, A.R.G., Paschoarelli, 
L.C., Clifford, M., 2019, Biomaterial based on brewing waste and vegetable resin: Characterization and 
application in product design, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 75, 475-480.  

Oktavilia. S., Hapsari. M., Firmansyah, Setyadharma. A., Fajarini, I.S.W., 2020, Plastic industry and world 
environmental problems, E3S Web of Conferences, 202, 05020. 

Rachwal. K., Waśko. A., Gustaw. K., Polak-Berecka, M, 2020, Utilization of brewery wastes in food industry, 
PeerJ. 8, 1–28.  

Rutiaga, M.O., Galan, L.J., Morales, L.H., Gordon, S.H., Imam, S.H., Orts, W.J., Glenn, G.M., Niño, K.A., 
2005, Mechanical property and biodegradability of cast films prepared from blends of oppositely charged 
biopolymers, Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 13, 2, 185-191.  

Saraiva, B.R., Anjo, F.A., Vital, A.C.P., Silva, L.H.M. Da, Ogawa, C.Y.L., Sato, F., Coimbra, L.B., Matumoto-
Pintro, P.T., 2019, Waste from brewing (trub) as a source of protein for the food industry, International 
Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54, 1247–1255.  

Schlemmer, D.A., Andreani, L. Valadares, L.F., 2014, Biomateriais: polímeros e compósitos, Embrapa 
Agroenergia - Comunicado Técnico, 10, 1–9. 

Skendi, A., Zinoviadou, K.G., Papageorgiou, M., Rocha. J.M., 2020, Advances on the valorisation and 
functionalization of by-products and wastes from cereal-based processing industry, Foods, 9, 9, 1243.  

STATISTA, 2020, Beer production worldwide from 1998 to 2019, 
<www.statista.com/statistics/270275/worldwide-beer-production/> accessed 06.12.2020. 

Vroman, I., Tighzert, L., 2009, Biodegradable polymers, Materials (Basel), 2, 2, 307–344. 
Wang. H., Wang. L., 2017, Developing a bio-based packaging film from soya by-products incorporated with 

valonea tannin, Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 624–633.  

324