001.docx


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                 DOI: 10.3303/CET2189021 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Paper Received: 26 May 2021; Revised: 6 September 2021; Accepted: 18 November 2021 
Please cite this article as: Ku D., Kim J., Yu Y., Kim S., Lee S., Lee S., 2021, Assessment of Eco-Friendly Effects on Green Transportation 
Demand Management, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 89, 121-126  DOI:10.3303/CET2189021 
  

 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS  
 

VOL. 89, 2021 

A publication of 

 

The Italian Association 
of Chemical Engineering 
Online at www.cetjournal.it 

Guest Editors: Jeng Shiun Lim, Nor Alafiza Yunus, Jiří Jaromír Klemeš 
Copyright © 2021, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 
ISBN 978-88-95608-87-7; ISSN 2283-9216 

Assessment of Eco-Friendly Effects on Green Transportation 

Demand Management 

Donggyun Kua, Jooyoung Kimb, Yeonseung Yuc, Sion Kimd, Shinhae Leee, 

Seungjae Leea,* 

a Department of Transportation Engineering, University of Seoul, Korea 
b Department of Transportation Policy, Korea National University of Transportation, Korea 
c Korea Research Institute of Transportation Industries, Korea 
d Department of Transportation Engineering, Department of Smart Cities, University of Seoul, Korea/ 
e Department of Transportation Systems Research, The Seoul Institute, Korea  
 sjlee@uos.ac.kr 

Transportation demand management has been implemented in Seoul to realize the transit-oriented 

development for its evolution into an eco-friendly city. The policies include reorganizing road space, restricting 

the operation of fifth-grade vehicles, increasing parking fees, and expanding shared bicycles. The Seoul 

Metropolitan Government monitors traffic changes by installing cameras at the point of entry into the city 

center for policy assessment. Furthermore, it acquires data about the number of public parking lots and 

shared bicycles. In this study, a quantitative evaluation of green traffic promotion area designation and 

implementation policies is conducted using various data. The analysis is conducted by classifying the effects 

of increasing and reducing eco-friendly transportation, and the benefits of reducing public bicycle use, air 

pollution, and parking costs are considered. The benefits of reducing air pollution by reducing traffic volume 

and the benefits of reducing parking costs by decreasing the number of parking units are calculated and 

estimated. The analysis shows that the cost-benefit of reducing air pollution by reducing traffic volume is 

approximately 42.5 B KRW/y. This qualitatively translates to approximately 1.3 M trees. The cost benefit of 

reducing the number of parked cars is estimated to be 18.2 B KRW. In addition, the average daily use of 

public bicycles, an eco-friendly mode of transportation, increases by approximately 390 units, as proven 

statistically. The results of this study confirm that transportation demand management enables eco-friendly 

goals to be achieved. Finally, It is expected to be used as an indicator for the Seoul Metropolitan 

Government's public transportation-oriented development policy. 

1. Introduction 

Rapid economic growth and urbanization have resulted in various traffic problems, such as air environment 

problems, traffic accidents, and traffic congestion (Ku et al., 2020). As this traffic problem intensifies, the 

paradigm of transportation policy is changing worldwide from vehicle- to human-oriented to eco-friendly. This 

trend has resulted in the implementation of a transit-oriented development policy through expanding the use of 

public transportation and curbing the use of passenger cars in developed countries (Ibraeva et al., 2015). In 

London, the Low Employment Zone was designated in 2008 to reduce air pollutant emissions. The number of 

vehicles in the district decreased, the proportion of low-pollution vehicles increased (Ellison et al., 2013). 

Inspired by this, the Seoul Metropolitan Government implemented a transportation demand management 

policy to transform Seoul into an eco-friendly city and promote changes in the urban structure. The Seoul 

Metropolitan Government's Green Transport Promotion Area Policy, which was implemented at the end of 

2019, was benchmarked with low-pollution areas (Ku et al., 2020) in large cities worldwide, including Milan, 

Rome, and Paris. The target area included Jongno-gu and 15 dongs in the Seoul metropolitan area described 

in Figure 1b. In the area, vehicles will be classified into 5 grades based on the degree of hazardous gas 

emissions; Grade 5 vehicles with the highest hazardous gas emissions will be restricted from entering the 

district and fined for violations. The reorganization of road space, and improvements in parking ceiling are also 

implemented. The ultimate aim is to circumvent and reduce traffic in the area, reducing congestion and air 

121



 

 

pollution. Various traffic big data are required to quantitatively evaluate the policy. The Seoul Metropolitan 

Government acquired data by installing cameras at 45 locations. A car traffic management system based on a 

control camera can acquire various transportation data such as traffic examination, traffic changes, and toll 

charges collection. Real-time monitoring and systematic post-evaluation can be performed using these data. 

In this study, the effectiveness of implementing policies in green transportation promotion areas shall be 

classified as an increase in eco-friendly transportation and a decrease in non-eco-friendly transportation through 

such collected data which is verified quantitatively. 

2. Methodology 

2.1 Discharging pollutant 

Hanpatanakit et al. (2018) conducted a survey using the bottom-up approach to estimate carbon dioxide 

emissions from tourist traffic on the island of Kok Mak in Thailand, where transport energy consumption was 

calculated using the method presented by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate. Zhang et al. (2016) 

presented a mixed-integer programming model for the energy consumption optimization of intercity high-

speed transport systems. In this study, they optimized the connections between large population centers and 

the transportation methods, as well as calculated costs while considering the lifespan of transport 

infrastructure and energy consumption. Li et al. (2015) developed a cost-optimization superstructure model to 

derive an optimal oil-saving route for road passenger transport by 2030. Seven vehicle categories, alternative 

fuels, and eight powertrain options were considered to minimize fuel and vehicle costs. Chen et al. (2018) 

developed an optimization model for safe and efficient logistics route exploration for hazardous chemicals. 

They derived improved path navigation capabilities by solving a dual-purpose optimization model that 

minimizes transport risk and distribution distance based on the type and weight of hazardous chemicals. 

2.2 Evaluation of environmentally friendly transportation policy 

Ku et al. (2021) investigated a methodology for evaluating the economics of rapid transit. The demand for 

bicycle use was derived by considering bicycle rental stations as transportation zones. Regarding the benefit 

analysis, it was deemed inappropriate to evaluate eco-friendly transportation projects such as Cycle Rapid 

Transit (CRT) based on only the benefits of reducing travel time and vehicle operation costs and adding them 

as a benefit analysis item of existing transportation projects. Sellitto et al. (2012) presented a model for 

evaluating user perceptions of the environmental effects of public transport operations. A survey of 300 public 

transportation users was conducted and analyzed via structural equation modeling. Although vehicle safety 

and pollutant emissions affected user perception, it was reasonable to conclude that user satisfaction 

increased significantly. Awasthi et al. (2011) introduced fuzzy TOPSIS to derive a comprehensive score for 

sustainability assessment and to select the best alternative for eco-friendly transportation systems. Decisions 

were made via a multicriteria decision-making approach by weighting the corresponding scores. 

2.3 Summary 

Research has been conducted on estimating pollutant emissions or solving optimization problems, and 

evaluating eco-friendly transportation policies, but it focuses on the development of general and theoretical 

models and methodologies. When evaluating a specific policy, the focus was on the environment before the 

implementation of the policy, failing to accurately derive the effect from the implementation of the policy. 

In the case of this study, data were collected and compared before and after the implementation to analyze 

the implementation effects of the Seoul Metropolitan Government's green transportation promotion regional 

policy, and external variables were also verified through statistical significance. 

3. Results 

The framework of this study is presented in Figure 1. 

 

Figure 1: Framework of this study  

122



 

 

In this study, separate analyses were conducted by reducing non-environmental transportation modes and 

increasing eco-friendly ones through implementing green transportation promotion areas. It was estimated that 

reducing traffic volume would reduce air pollution and parking costs. The benefits of air pollution reduction 

were presented in terms of the number of trees for estimating its scale intuitively. The effect of increasing the 

number of public bicycles was analysed by eliminating seasonal characteristics and related infrastructure ones.  

3.1 Traffic reduction effect 

According to the analysis of the effect of reducing traffic volume owing to the designation of green 

transportation promotion areas and the implementation of eco-friendly transportation policies, the daily traffic 

volume decreased by approximately 13 % from 778,000 units/d (July 2019) to 679,000 units/d (September 

2020) described in Figure 2a. Based on the analysis, the amount of change in grade 5 vehicles decreased by 

47 % from 15,000/d to 8,000/d described in Figure 2b, indicating a significant reduction in traffic volume. The 

traffic volume of vehicles without pollutant reduction devices among grade 5 vehicles decreased by 

approximately 87 % from 9,000 units/d to 1,000 units/d, which prevented a significant number of pollution 

vehicles from entering green traffic promotion areas. 

 

Figure 2: Effect of reducing traffic volume by car type (a) whole vehicles; (b) Type 5 vehicles 

Street traffic reduced from 2,202,044 (1,000 veh-km) to 1,494,257 (1,000 veh-km), and the average distance 

per vehicle reduced from 8.13 to 7.32 km (Table 1). This is primarily due to the transition of medium-and long-

distance traffic using other transportation modes and routes.  

Table 1: Effect of reducing traffic volume and average travel distance (Units: t/y) 

 

The traffic volume decreased owing to the designation of green transportation promotion areas and the 

implementation of policies, which benefited the transportation and environmental sectors. The benefits of 

reducing air pollution in the transportation sector were calculated by comparing the traffic volume, distance, 

and time of passage in the analysis area before and after the implementation of the policy. A pre-investigated 

methodology for calculating the benefits of reducing air pollution in Korea’s transportation sector was applied 

(Nam et al., 2008). 

This methodology defines CO, CO2, SO2, hydrocarbons (HC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and fine dust (PM) as air 

pollution contributors. Pollutant emissions are significantly affected by the type and performance of the vehicle, 

the driving conditions, the traffic, and the road conditions. The original units for each vehicle type and speed 

were calculated and applied differently. The emission coefficient for each pollutant generated by driving a car 

was calculated, and the air pollution cost unit for each type and speed was estimated by applying the air 

pollution cost unit for each pollutant. The emission coefficient for each pollutant generated via motor vehicle 

operation was applied to the total traffic distance (veh-km) in the analysis area and compared before and after 

the implementation of the policy. By calculating the change in air pollutants following the implementation of the 

policy, it was discovered that CO decreased by 42.40 %, CO2 by 38.69 %, and NOx by 36.60 % (Table 2).  

Table 2: Reduction in air pollution (Units: t/y) 

Classification CO NOx VOC PM2.5 CO2 

Before 1,717 1,686 202 49 581,125 

After 989 1,069 127 32 356,309 

Difference (%) -728(-42.4%) -617(-36.6%) -74(-36.6%) -18(-36.7%) -224,817(-38.7%) 

Classification Before After Difference Difference (%) 

Distance-Volume (1,000 veh-km) 2,202,044 1,494,257 -707,787 -32.14 

Traffic Volume (1,000 veh/y) 270,965 204,165 -66,801 -24.65 

Average Travel Distance(km) 8.13 7.32 -0.8 -9.84 

123



 

 

 

The total air pollution reduction benefits, i.e., calculated using Eq(1), multiplying the cost units to handle air 

pollutant to the amount of air pollutant reduction as in Eq(2), was 42.5 B KRW/y. If the previous methodology 

pertaining to the absorption volume of CO2 by trees is applied to this result, then it may be converted to the effect 

of planting 1.3 M trees, 

𝑉𝑂𝑃𝐶𝑆 = 𝑉𝑂𝑃𝐶𝐵𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 − 𝑉𝑂𝑃𝐶𝐴𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟  (1) 

𝑉𝑂𝑃𝐶 = ∑ ∑ 𝐷𝑙𝑘 × 𝑉𝑇𝑘
3
𝑘=1 × 365𝑙   (2) 

where VOPC is Valuation of Pollution Cost Saving, Dlk is total travel distance(veh·km) by link(l), by vehicle type(k), 

VTk is air pollution cost (KRW/km) of the link speed by vehicle type(k), k is vehicle type (1: auto, 2: bus, 3: freight). 

3.2 Parking changes 

Among the policies to curb demand for passenger cars, parking conditions control policies such as “parking 

fee surcharge” and “restricting the number of parking spaces” are known to exhibit excellent effects (Zoeter et 

al., 2014). The Seoul Metropolitan Government implemented a parking fee surcharge policy for fifth-grade 

vehicles in public parking lots located in Seoul to encourage passengers to switch to public transportation. 

According to a survey of the number of parking used at 22 public parking lots in the analysis area, an average 

of 7,679 cars used parking lots daily before the implementation of the premium policy. After the 

implementation of the policy, an average of 7,062 cars used parking lots daily, indicating an 8.0 % decrease in 

users (Table 3). 

Table 3: Changes in the number uses of parking lots at public parking spaces (Units: veh/d, %) 

Classification Before After Difference 

Green traffic  

promotion areas 

(22 spaces) 

Dec, 2019 7,679 

Jan, 2020 7,367 -312 -4.1 % 

Feb, 2020 6,918 -761 -9.9 % 

Mar, 2020 6,930 -749 -9.8 % 

Average 7,062 -617 -8.0 % 

 

A reduction in passenger traffic due to eco-friendly transportation policies may reduce parking demand in non-

residential areas. Resources such as land and facility operating costs incurred in operating parking lots can be 

used for other purposes, resulting in social benefits (Jang et al., 2007). In this study, the methodology proposed 

by the Korea Development Institute for reducing parking costs was applied. In this methodology, it is assumed 

that parking fees reflect the cost of constructing and operating parking lots. This is because limitations exist that 

hinder the opportunity cost of parking to be calculated accurately. The benefits of reducing parking costs were 

calculated from the savings in parking fees. To calculate the benefits of reducing parking costs, the average 

parking fee (KRW 2,067) in the analytical area and the percentages of traffic to work and shopping were applied. 

It can be expressed like Eq(3) and(4). The result indicates an annual benefit of approximately 18.2 B KRW. 

𝑉𝑂𝑃𝐶𝑆 = 𝑉𝑂𝑃𝐶𝐵𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 − 𝑉𝑂𝑃𝐶𝐴𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟   (3) 

𝑉𝑂𝑃𝐶 =
1

2
∑ ∑ (𝐷𝑖𝑗

𝑦
× 𝑝 × 𝛼0

𝑘𝑦
)𝑖𝑗𝑖𝑗   

 (4) 

Where VOPCS is Valuation of Parking Cost Saving, i is the origin of trips, j is the destination of trips, 𝐷𝑖𝑗
𝑦
 is 

auto traffic volume from I to j in y year(veh/y), p is the proportion of purpose trips, y is years, 𝛼0
𝑘𝑦

 is the parking 

fee per vehicle in y years (KRW/(veh·y)) 

3.3 Changes in public bicycle use 

A public bicycle rental system is essential for reducing passenger car traffic and increasing the number of 

public transport users. The Seoul Metropolitan Government operates “Ttareungi,” a public bicycle rental 

service, and is expanding related infrastructure such as rental stations and stands to promote its use (Shin et 

al., 2007). In Table 4, as of June 2020, 167 rental stations were installed in the Green Transportation 

Promotion Area (Jongro-gu, Jung-gu), which is an increase of approximately 56 % compared with the number 

in the previous year. The number of bicycle racks increased by approximately 64 % annually to 1,930 (as of 

June 2020). The designation and implementation of the Green Transportation Promotion Area began in July 

2019. To reduce confusion among citizens, a guidance period of six months was provided before the policy was 

124



 

 

legally implemented. To analyse the policy effects, data regarding the use of public bicycles were acquired and 

analysed for six months before and after the implementation of the policy, excluding the guidance period. 

Table 4: Trends in infrastructure and use of public bicycles before and after implementation of green 

transportation promotion areas 

Classification Jen Feb Mar Apr May Jun 

Before 

(2019) 

Rental offices 107 107 107 107 107 107 

Rests 1,180 1,080 1,180 1,180 1,180 1,180 

Number of uses 1,470 1,414 2,279 3,407 4,308 4,498 

After 

(2020) 

Rental offices 111 129 111 111 111 167 

Rests 1,277 1,554 1,277 1,277 1,277 1,930 

Number of uses 1,946 1,949 2,804 4,063 4,083 4,870 

 

The abovementioned procedure was performed to measure the effect of implementing green transportation 

promotion areas that included the effects of the variables by constructing models including other factors such as 

the effects of increasing public bicycle infrastructure or seasonal factors. For seasonal factors, the effects from 

each month were regarded as different, and each effect was treated as a dummy variable. It is described in Eq(5).  

𝑈𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑏𝑖𝑐𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒 = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1 ∗ (𝑅𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑂𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑠) + 𝛽2 ∗ 𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑠 + ∑ 𝛽𝑖+2 ∗ 𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑑𝑢𝑚𝑚𝑦𝑖
6
𝑖=1 + 𝛽9 ∗

𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑 + 𝜇     
(5) 

Where 𝑈𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑏𝑖𝑐𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒 is the daily usages of public bicycles, 𝛽0 is intercepts, 𝑅𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑂𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑠 is the number of rented offices 

in green traffic promotion areas, Rests is the number of rests in green traffic promotion areas, 𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑑𝑢𝑚𝑚𝑦𝑖 is 

dummy variables describing month 𝑖(e.g. Jan≡(𝛽3=1, Others=0), Apr≡(𝛽6=1, Others=0)), 𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑 is dummy 

variables whether the policy is implemented (𝑏𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒=0, 𝐴𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟=1), 𝜇 is residuals. 

The results of the model are presented in the left part of Table 5. It shows that the infrastructure variable 

parameters demonstrated negligible statistical significance, and that the number of public bicycles uses, and 

the degree of infrastructure construction were almost not correlated.  

Table 5: A model describing the number of uses of public bicycles, including infrastructure variables 

Classification Before removing infrastructure variables After removing infrastructure variables 

Variables Estimated Std error T statistics P value Estimated Std error T statistics P value 

Intercepts 1,572.13 876.82 1.79 1.71E-01 1,499.83 117.54 12.76 1.42E-05 

Rental offices -11.79 32.44 -0.36 7.40E-01 - - - - 

Rests 1.03 2.62 0.39 7.20E-01 - - - - 

Month dummy1 -11.78 293.40 -0.04 7.05E-02 - - - - 

Month dummy2 833.5 280.03 2.98 5.88E-02 846.75 176.31 4.80 2.99E-03 

Month dummy3 2,027 280.03 7.24 5.44E-03 2040.25 176.31 11.57 2.51E-05 

Month dummy4 2,487.5 280.03 8.88 3.01E-03 2500.75 176.31 14.18 7.67E-06 

Month dummy5 2,969 356.98 8.32 3.64E-03 2989.25 176.31 16.95 2.69E-06 

Implemented 305.02 279.60 1.09 3.55E-01 389.83 117.54 3.37 1.61E-02 

 

The corresponding variables are removed, and the model is rebuilt. After rebuilding the model, in the right part of 

Table 5, the statistical significance of the parameters of all variables was verified to confirm that their effects were 

statistically significant. The analysis showed that the value indicating whether the green transportation 

promotion area was implemented was estimated to be 389.83, which was statistically significant. 

4. Conclusions 

In this study, the quantitative effects of the green transportation area policy were analysed. To analyse the 

effectiveness of this policy, The changes in eco-friendly and non-environmental transportation modes was 

analysed. For the former, the number of uses of public bicycles was analysed. For the latter, the benefits of 

reducing air pollution and parking costs due to changes in traffic in the focus area were analysed. After 

implementing the policy, 707,787,000 km of street traffic was reduced annually, and the average travel 

distance was reduced by 0.8 km. The cost-benefit of reducing air pollution by reducing traffic volume was 

calculated to be approximately 42.5 B KRW/y. In terms of the number of parking lots, a decrease of 617 

parking lots per day on average was recorded in 22 public parking lots in the green transportation promotion 

area, and the cost benefit of reducing parking costs was 18.2 B KRW. To analyse the changes in the number 

125



 

 

of public bicycle use, a model including infrastructure and seasonal factors was established to analyse the 

actual effect of implementing policies in green transportation promotion areas. The effect of increasing the 

number of public bicycles used by an average of 390 units/d was observed after implementing the green 

transportation promotion area. It was confirmed that eco-friendly transportation policies achieved goals that 

promoted eco-friendliness. In addition to the effects estimated in this study when implementing eco-friendly 

transportation policies, various effects such as health benefits and noise reduction benefits should be 

considered. Although they are not yet included in the domestic market as quantitative effects of implementing 

the policy, other countries are determined to include them. Further studies reflecting these effects should be 

carried out later. In addition, in the case of green transportation promotion areas analyzed in this study, it was 

only a short-term effect analysis not long after the policy was implemented. Research should be conducted 

later to identify trends in policy effects through mid-to-long-term data analysis. We hope that the results of this 

study will be applicable as an evaluation indicator of eco-friendly transportation policies for developing a 

completely eco-friendly Seoul.  

Acknowledgments 

This study was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research 

Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1D1A1B06032857). 

References 

Awasthi A., Chauhan S. S., Omrani H, 2011, Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in Evaluating Sustainable 

Transportation Systems, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12270-12280. 

Chen X, 2018, Route Optimization of Hazardous Chemical Logistics Transportation Based on Improved Ant 

Colony Algorithm. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 71, 637-642. 

Ellison R. B., Greaves S. P., Hensher D. A. 2013, Five years of London’s Low Emission Zone: Effects on 

Vehicle Fleet Composition and Air Quality, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 

23, 25-33. 

Hanpattanakit P., Pimonsree L., Jamnongchob A., Boonpoke A., 2018, CO2 Emission and Reduction of 

Tourist Transportation at Kok Mak Island, Thailand, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 63, 37-42. 

Ibraeva A., De Almeida Correia G. H., Silva C., Antunes A. P. 2020, Transit-Oriented Development: A review 

of Research Achievements and Challenges, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 

110-130. 

Jang S. E., Jeong G. H. 2007, A way to Estimating the Benefit of Parking Cost Savings in the Rail Investment 

Appraisal. KOR-KST Conference, Korean Society of Transportation, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. 

Ku D., Bencekri M., Kim J., Lee S. J. Lee S. H, 2020, Review of European Low Emission Zone 

Policy. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 78, 241-246. 

Ku D., Kwak J., Na S., Lee S. J., Lee S. H, 2021, Impact Assessment on Cycle Super Highway Schemes, 

Chemical Engineering Transactions, 83, 181-186. 

Ku D., Na S., Kim J., Lee S., 2020, Interpretations of Downs–Thomson Paradox with Median Bus Lane 

Operations, Research in Transportation Economics, 83, 100909. 

Li Z., Liang J., Liu P., Ma L., 2015, The Optimal Oil-Saving Pathway Until 2030 for China Road Passenger 

Transportation Based on a Cost Optimisation Model, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 45, 1885-1890. 

Nam D. H., Lee, J. S., Min, B. Y., 2011, Current Methodologies for Environmental Impact Studies of Railroad-

related Projects, KSR Conference. The Korean Society for Railway. Uiwang, Republic of Korea. 

Sellitto M. A., Borchardt M., Pereira G. M., Sauer, M. B., 2013, Perception of Users on the Environmental 

Impact Caused by Public Transport Operation, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 35, 793-798.  

Shin H. C., Kim, D. J., Jeong, S. Y., 2012, Impact Analysis on Bike-Sharing and its Improvement Plan, KOTI, 

1-310. 

Zhang R., Liu P., Zhou C., Amorelli A., Li Z., 2016, Optimal High-Speed Passenger Transport Network with 

Minimal Integrated Construction and Operation Energy Consumption Based on Superstructure Model, 

Chemical Engineering Transactions, 52, 319-324. 

Zoeter O., Dance C., Clinchant S., Andreoli J. M. 2014, New algorithms for Parking Demand Management and 

a City-scale Deployment. 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data 

mining, New York, USA. 

126