CET 96


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                 DOI: 10.3303/CET2296078 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Paper Received: 27 June 2022; Revised: 06 September 2022; Accepted: 17 October 2022 
Please cite this article as: Reddy T., Seodigeng T., Rutto H., 2022, Response Surface Analysis and Modeling of Sclerocarya Birrea kernel Oil 
Yield in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 96, 463-468  DOI:10.3303/CET2296078 
  

 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS  
 

VOL. 96, 2022 

A publication of 

 
The Italian Association 

of Chemical Engineering 
Online at www.cetjournal.it 

Guest Editors: David Bogle, Flavio Manenti, Piero Salatino 
Copyright © 2022, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 

ISBN 978-88-95608-95-2; ISSN 2283-9216 

Response Surface Analysis and Modeling of Sclerocarya 
Birrea kernel Oil Yield in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide  

Trishen Reddya, Tumisang Seodigengb,*, Hilary Ruttoa 
aDepartment of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Vaal University of Technology, Andries Potgieter Blvd, 
Vanderbijlpark, Gauteng, 1900, South Africa  
bCentre for Renewable Energy and Water, Vaal University of Technology, Andries Potgieter Blvd, Vanderbijlpark, Gauteng, 
1900, South Africa  
  
The response surface methodology (RSM) was used to evaluate the influence of two independent variables 
namely extraction temperature and extraction pressure via literature data obtained from supercritical fluid 
extraction (SFE) process of Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil. The optimal (custom) option was utilised on Design 
Expert Version 13 to optimise the variables taken into consideration. The raw experimental data comprised of 9 
experimental runs of which the temperature was varied between 40, 60 and 75 °C and the pressure was varied 
between 250, 350 and 450 bar. The reaction time, particle size and carbon dioxide (CO2) flowrate was kept 
constant at 30 kg CO2/hour for all experimental runs. Each extraction lasted for 270 minutes and each set of 
extraction conditions was repeated in triplicate. The determination coefficient value (R2), adjusted R2 value, p-
values and F-values were considered in determining the effectiveness of the response surface methodology 
model. The results from the analysis of variance indicated that the all model terms excluding the quadratic 
temperature term are all highly significant with p values less than 0.01. The quadratic term of temperature has 
no significant effect on Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil yield. The optimal conditions to obtain the maximum oil yield 
from Sclerocarya birrea kernels were at a pressure of 450 bar and temperature of 60 °C. Under these optimal 
conditions, the yield of Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil was predicted to be 9.22 g oil/L CO2. The experiment results 
obtained from literature agreed with the predicted values as indicated by the R2 and adjusted R2 values which 
were 0.98 and 0.97 respectively. 

1. Introduction 

Sclerocarya birrea is commonly known as marula (English); maroela (Afrikaans); morula (Tswana); and umGanu 
(isiZulu). The plant is widely distributed in South Africa, Botswana, Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Kenya, 
Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Senegal, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, 
Zambia and Zimbabwe (Orwa et al., 2009). It is a popular plant species because it provides nutritional 
sustenance to the population throughout the year (Mojeremane & Tshwenyane, 2004). For this reason, it is 
often referred to as the “tree of life” (Welford, Abad & Gericke, 2008). Almost all of the major constituents of the 
marula tree can be utilised (Orwa et al., 2009). The wood of the plant is utilised to produce fencing, erecting 
housing, roofing and poles (Mojeremane & Tshwenyane, 2004). The bark of the tree is also utilised by the locals 
to treat many ailments viz. fevers, diarrhea, boils, syphilis, leprosy, dysentery, hepatitis, rheumatism, 
gonorrhoea, diabetes, dysentery and malaria (Mutshinyalo & Tshisevhe, 2003). The fruits of the plant are 
consumed as is or can be processed to manufacture juices and a fermented alcohol beverage whilst the nut of 
the marula tree has a diameter of 2-3 cm of which holds 3-4 kernels that are utilised to produce porridges 
(Mojeremane & Tshwenyane, 2004). The kernels have a composition that is made up of 5.2 % moisture and 
55.9 % oil (Zharare & Dhlamini, 2000). South African marula kernels are rich in fatty acids namely oleic, palmitic 
and stearic acid (Mthiyane & Hugo, 2019). Oleic, palmitic, and stearic acid are fatty acids that the human body 
naturally produces. (Vermaak et al., 2011). Oilseeds can be processed by mechanical means however the 
process is time consuming and labour intensive (Jahirul et al.,2013). Solvent extraction is also utilised in oil 
extraction as it is more effective than mechanical processing methods; but the process is hazardous and the 
quality of the oil is compromised (Ajila et al., 2011).  

463



For this reason, supercritical fluid extraction has gained popularity recently (Sovova & Stateva, 2011). It is also 
a process that is environmentally friendly (Hashemi, Khaneghah & de Souza Sant'Ana, 2017). It is claimed to 
be environmentally friendly because the most common solvent that is utilised in SFE is carbon dioxide which is 
safe and non-flammable (Chemat, 2017). Carbon dioxide can also be reutilised in the process and hence, it is 
a cost effective process (Lavenburg, Rosentrater & Jung, 2021). A maximum recovery of 55 % Sclerocarya 
birrea kernel oil under supercritical fluid conditions at 450 bars and 60 °C has been reported (Taseki, 2015). 

2. Materials and Methods 

2.1. Computational methods: Response surface experimental design 

In this study, RSM was utilised to optimise the operating conditions of supercritical carbon dioxide via literature 
data obtained from (SFE) process of Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil. Taseski (2015), conducted supercritical fluid 
extraction of Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil which comprised of 9 experimental runs for the determination of the 
solubility of Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil in supercritical carbon dioxide. The extraction temperature was varied 
between 40, 60 and 75 °C and the extraction pressure was varied between 250, 350 and 450 bar. The reaction 
time remained constant at 270 minutes for all experimental runs whilst the particle size was kept constant at 
850 μm. The carbon dioxide flowrate was maintained at 30 kg CO2/hour for all experimental runs. Each set of 
extraction conditions was repeated in triplicate and the average oil yield at each extraction condition was then 
utilised for optmisation purposes. The two independent variables were studied namely extraction temperature 
(X1) and extraction pressure (X2). The independent variables were coded at three levels to ensure that there is 
an equal and even distribution of the intervals and levels (Baş & Boyacı., 2007). The independent variables are 
typically coded as it makes it easier to observe their influence on the response (Tirado-Kulieva et al., 2021). The 
independent variables were therefore coded using equation 1 below (Nandiwale & Bokade, 2014). The coded 
levels and intervals were therefore dispersed between 1-low, 0-medium and 1-high (Tharazi, Sulong & Mohd 
Salleh, 2020). 
 
𝑋𝑖 =

𝑥𝑖−𝑥𝑜

(
𝑥𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚−𝑥𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

2
)
     (1) 

Where xi represents the actual value for temperature and pressure), xo represents the real variable value at 
centre point, Xi denotes the variable that has been coded, xmaximum and xminimum are the maximum and minimum 
values of the real independent variables. Using equation 1 resulted in the following coded levels as depicted in 
table 1.  

Table 1: Independent variables and their levels for RSM design. 

Factor Description Unit of 
measure 

Type  
-1 

Low 

Level 
0 

Medium 

 
          1 

High 
X1 Temperature °C Numerical 40 60 75 
X2 Pressure Bar Numerical 250 350 450 

 
The response surface methodology was conducted to study the effect of the operating parameters on the 
solubility of Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil in supercritical carbon dioxide. The optimal (custom) design was utilised 
on Design Expert Version 13 to develop a second order polynomial equation as shown in equation 2 was utilised 
to express the oil yield (Y) of Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil. 
 
𝑌 =  𝐵𝑂 + ∑ 𝐵𝑖 𝑥𝑖

𝑛
𝑖=1 + ∑ 𝐵𝑖𝑖 𝑥𝑖

2𝑛
𝑖=1 + ∑ ∑ 𝐵𝑥𝑖 𝑥𝑗

𝑛
𝑗=𝑖+1

𝑛
𝑖=1     (2) 

 
Where, Y is the predicted response; B0 is a constant; Bi is the coefficient of the linear terms, Bii is the coefficient 
of the quadratic terms, xi and xj is the independent variables. 
The coefficients of the second order model was obtained via Design Expert version 13. The goodness of fit was 
determined using the analysis of variance and the efficacy of the models was tested by calculating the R2 for 
each model and also the average absolute relative deviation.  
 
 

464



3. Results and Discussion 

3.1. Model Fitting 

Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil yield obtained from literature is presented in table 2. The experimental data was 
utilised to determine the coefficients of the second order polynomial equation. For each of the responses under 
investigation, a second-order polynomial equation was obtained using the multiple regression analysis and the 
partial sum of squares. The Fisher's test was used to determine the model coefficients' significance. The Fisher 
test considers the residual error and the F-value, which is a portion of the average square of the model (Rassem 
et al., 2019). As a function of the independent variables in terms of coded components, the second-order 
polynomial equation was used to express the solubility of Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil in supercritical carbon 
dioxide and is provided in equation 3.  
 
𝑌 ( 

𝑔 𝑜𝑖𝑙

𝐿 𝐶𝑂2
) = 8.05 − 0.6058𝑋1 + 2.58𝑋2 + 1.15𝑋1𝑋2 − 0.0704𝑋1

2 − 1.66𝑋2
2    (3) 

 
Equation 3 can also be expressed in terms of uncoded factors and is given in equation 4. 
 
𝑌 ( 

𝑔 𝑜𝑖𝑙

𝐿 𝐶𝑂2
) = −6.89065 − 0.238031𝑥1 + 0.104401𝑥2 + 0.000657𝑥1𝑥2 − 0.000230𝑥1

2 − 0.000166𝑥2
2   (4) 

 

3.2. Response surface analysis 

The overall F value of 208.6 indicates that the model is significant. The linear model terms of temperature and 
pressure, as well as the interaction model term and quadratic pressure term all have p-values that are less 0.01; 
which is an indication that these model terms are very significant. The quadratic term of temperature however 
had no significant effect on Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil yield as indicated by the p value of 0.6753. Figures. 1a 
and figure 1b show how the independent factors and oil yield relate to one another as shown in figure 1a and 
figure 1b depicting the response surface curve and its contour plot. From figure 1a and figure 1b, it can be seen 
that the extraction pressure showed a quadratic effect on the response. The higher solvent-solute interaction is 
a result of the high concentrations of CO2 at the elevated pressure levels which can be attributed to the high 
negative yet substantial quadratic pressure term (Bala et al., 2016). Similar patterns were seen in the extraction 
of mango seed kernel oil using SFE, according to Cerón-Martnez et al. (2021). The quadratic pressure term was 
observed by the authors to be both negative and extremely significant. According to Nandiwale and Bokade 
(2014), positive values for the linear variables show that the yield increases immediately as the positive variable 
rises. The fact that the coefficient of pressure is greater than both the coefficient of temperature and the 
interaction term suggests that pressure controls how much oil is produced. The similar patterns were seen by 
Peng, Setapar, and Nasir (2020) when they optimized the supercritical CO2 extraction of roselle oil using RSM.  
From figure 1b, it can be seen that the yield for the concentration can be optimised, as there is a continual linear 
increase on oil yield pertaining to the lower extraction pressure range corresponding to a decrease in extraction 
temperature. It can also be observed that as the extraction pressure increases, the yield also increases with an 
increasing temperature.  The yield however reaches a maximum with an increase in pressure and thereafter 
decreases in a parabolic manner. The maximum/minimum oil yield can therefore be located using a partial 
derivative of equation 4 with respect to pressure. 
 
 𝜕𝑌
𝜕𝑋2

= 0.10440057568066 + 0.00065669012459622𝑥1 − 0.000332582𝑥2 = 0    (5) 
 
The plot of the optimised concentration is depicted in figure 2a. The variance inflation factors for each model 
term are all relatively close to 1, which shows that the components are orthogonal. The robust agreement 
between the projected R2 value and the adjusted R2 value demonstrates the model's appropriateness. The parity 
plot as shown in figure 2b demonstrates that the predicted values and experimental values are on par. The oil 
yield is dependent on both temperature and pressure, according to the response surface plot, but pressure has 
a far greater impact than temperature. This is demonstrated by the unimportant temperature quadratic model 
term, which had a p-value of 0.6753. The results are in line with Rassem et al. (2019) in which the authors 
emphasize that pressure was the most significant factor influencing the output of essential oil from jasmine 
flowers. The authors go on to explain that pressure can interact with temperature indefinitely because of its 
polarity. The response surface plot shows that the maximum oil yield was attained at 60 °C for the midpoint 
temperature and 450 bar for the maximum pressure. As a result, pressure has a significant impact on the oil 
yield, and the two variables are directly related. dos Santos Garcia, da Silva, and Cardozo Filho (2013) also 
noted that the corresponding temperature and pressure that produced the best oil yield were 40 °C and 60 °C, 

465



respectively. According to Louaer et al. (2018), operating at lower pressures and at an elevated temperature 
simultaneously reduced the solvent power, which in turn decreased the oil output. This is clear when the oil 
output is at its lowest, 1.85 g.L-1, at the lowest pressure of 250 bar and the maximum temperature of 75 °C. 
Montesantos et al. (2019) state that an increase in the solvents density results in an increase in the oil extraction. 
Lachos-Perez et al. (2020) also agrees in which the authors found that the highest yield was obtained at higher 
CO2 density on the SFE process using CO2 of lipophilic molecules from sugarcane straw. 

Table 2: Optimal (custom) design and response for the oil yield of Sclerocarya birrea kernels. 

Run X1  
(°C) 

X2 
 (bar) 

Coded 
Temperature 

variable 

Coded 
Pressure 
variable 

Observed response     
(g oil/L CO2) 

Predicted response          
(g oil/L CO2) 

1 40 250 -1 -1 5.808 5.515 
2 60 250 0 -1 3.5415 3.580 
3 75 250 1 -1 1.8512 2.007 
4 40 350 -1 0 8.1345 8.623 
5 60 350 0 0 7.8533 8.002 
6 75 350 1 0 7.7568 7.415 
7 40 450 -1 1 8.4825 8.412 
8 60 450 0 1 9.2213 9.104 
9 75 450 1 1 8.9301 9.502 

Table 3: Analysis of variance for the fitted quadratic polynomial model. 

Source Sum of 
Squares 

Degree of 
freedom 

Mean Square F-value p-value   

Model 104.88 5 20.98 208.36 < 0.0001 significant 
X1-Temperature 2.69 1 2.69 26.71 0.0004   
X2-Pressure 60.43 1 60.43 600.2 < 0.0001   
X1X2 6.13 1 6.13 60.84 < 0.0001   
X1² 0.0187 1 0.0187 0.1862 0.6753   
X2² 10.11 1 10.11 100.41 < 0.0001   
Residual 1.01 10 0.1007    
Lack of Fit 1.01 3 0.3356    
Pure Error 0 7 0    
Total 105.89 15     
Standard deviation 0.3173   R2 0.9905   
Mean 6.45   Adj R2 0.9857   
C.V % 4.92   Adeq precision 38.3409   

Table 4: Regression coefficient of polynomial function of response surface oil yield. 

Factor Coefficient 
Estimate 

Degree of 
freedom 

Standard 
Error 

95% CI     
Low 

95% CI    
High 

Variance 
inflation factor 

Intercept 8.05 1 0.1555 7.7 8.39  
X1-Temperature -0.6058 1 0.1172 -0.867 -0.3446 1.03 
X2-Pressure 2.58 1 0.1051 2.34 2.81 1.07 
X1X2 1.15 1 0.1473 0.8209 1.48 1.08 
X1² -0.0704 1 0.1631 -0.4338 0.2931 1.01 
X2² -1.66 1 0.1659 -2.03 -1.29 1.03 
 

466



 
Figure 1: a) Contour plot for the effects of temperature and pressure on oil yield b) Response surface for the 

effects of temperature and pressure on oil yield. 

 
 

Figure 2: a) Optimisation of pressure and temperature b) Predicted values versus actual response. 

4. Conclusions 

RSM was successfully used to optimize the supercritical fluid extraction parameters to increase the production 
of Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil. The two variables namely extraction pressure and extraction temperature both 
had a significant effect on the oil yield, both alone and in conjunction, according to the response surface plots. 
A higher fluid density results from an increase in pressure, which raises the solubility. When it comes to 
temperature, the opposite is observed because an increase in temperature at a fixed pressure reduces the 
density of the CO2 in the supercritical state, thus reducing the solubility. The quadratic temperature term however 
had no significant effect on Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil yield.  The coefficient of pressure is also much larger 
in comparison to the coefficient of temperature and the interaction term which is an indication that pressure is 
an indispensable variable on the yield of Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil.  

References 

Ajila, C.M., Brar, S.K., Verma, M., Tyagi, R.D., Godbout, S. and Valéro, J.R., 2011, Extraction and analysis of 
polyphenols: recent trends. Critical reviews in biotechnology, 31, 227-249 
DOI:10.3109/07388551.2010.513677 

467



Bala, M., Madhu, B., Tyagi, S.K. and Gupta, R.K., 2016, Optimization of supercritical CO2 extraction of safflower 
seed oil using response surface methodology. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 28,1579-1583 
DOI:10.14233/ajchem.2016.19759 

Baş, D. and Boyacı, I.H., 2007, Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. Journal 
of food engineering, 78, 836-845 DOI:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024. 

Cerón-Martínez, L.J., Hurtado-Benavides, A.M., Ayala-Aponte, A., Serna-Cock, L. and Tirado, D.F., 2021, A 
Pilot-Scale Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction to Valorize Colombian Mango Seed Kernel. Molecules, 
26, .1-14 DOI:10.3390/molecules26082279 

Chemat, S. (Ed), 2017, Edible oils: extraction, processing, and applications. CRC Press, Florida, United States. 
dos Santos Garcia, V.A., da Silva, C. and Cardozo Filho, L., 2013, Extraction of Mucuna deeringiana seed oil 

using supercritical carbon dioxide. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 35, 499-505 
DOI:10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i3.13807 

Jahirul, M.I., Brown, J.R., Senadeera, W., Ashwath, N., Laing, C., Leski-Taylor, J. and Rasul, M.G., 2013, 
Optimisation of bio-oil extraction process from beauty leaf (Calophyllum inophyllum) oil seed as a second 
generation biodiesel source. Procedia Engineering, 56, 619-624 DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.168 

Lachos Perez D., Barrales F.M., Martinez J., Maciel Filho R., 2020, Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Lipophilic 
Molecules from Sugarcane Straw, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 80, 313-318 DOI:10.3303/CET2080053 
Louaer, M., Zermane, A., Larkeche, O. and Meniai, A.H., 2018, Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Algerian date 

seeds oil: Effect of Experimental Parameters on Extraction Yield and Fatty Acids Composition Mehdi 
Louaer1, Ahmed Zermane1, 2, Ouassila Larkeche1, Abdeslam Hassan Meniai1. World, 7(2), 108-116. 

Mojeremane, W. and Tshwenyane, S.O., 2004, The resource role of morula (Sclerocarya birrea): A multipurpose 
indigenous fruit tree of Botswana. Journal of Biological Sciences, 4, 771-775. 

Montesantos N., Pedersen T.H., Nielsen R., Rosendahl L.A., Maschietti M., 2019, High-temperature Extraction 
of Lignocellulosic Bio-oil by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 74, 799-804 
DOI:10.3303/CET1974134 

Mthiyane, D.M.N. and Hugo, A., 2019, Comparative health-related fatty acid profiles, atherogenicity and 
desaturase indices of marula seed cake products from South Africa and Eswatini DOI: 
10.20944/preprints201911.0132.v1 

Mutshinyalo, T. and Tshisevhe, J., 2003, Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst. Subsp. Caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro. 
Pretoria National Botanical Garden. 

Nandiwale, K.Y. and Bokade, V.V., 2014, Process optimization by response surface methodology and kinetic 
modeling for synthesis of methyl oleate biodiesel over H3PW12O40 anchored montmorillonite K10. 
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 53, 18690-18698 DOI:10.1021/ie500672v 

Orwa, C., Mutua, A. Kindt, R., Jamnadass, R. & Anthony, S. 2009, Agroforestry Database: A Tree Reference 
and Selection Guide version 4.0 <http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sites/treedbs/treedatabases.asp> 
accessed 10.08.2022. 

Peng, W.L., Setapar, S.H.M. and Nasir, H.M., 2020, Process optimization of supercritical CO2 extraction of 
Roselle using response surface methodology. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 16, 
30-33. 

Rassem, H.H., Nour, A.H., Yunus, R.M., Zaki, Y.H. and Abdlrhman, H.S.M., 2019, Yield Optimization and 
Supercritical CO 2 Extraction of Essential Oil from Jasmine Flower. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 19, 
479-485 DOI:10.22146/ijc.39710 

Taseski, N., 2015, Supercritical fluid extraction of Sclerocarya birrea kernel oil, Doctoral dissertation), University 
of North West, North West, South Africa. 

Tharazi, I., Sulong, A.B. and Mohd Salleh, F., 2020, Application of response surface methodology for 
parameters optimization in hot pressing kenaf reinforced biocomposites. Journal of Mechanical Engineering 
(JMechE), 17, 131-144. 

Tirado-Kulieva, V.A., Sánchez-Chero, M., Yarlequé, M.V., Aguilar, G.F.V., Carrión-Barco, G. and Santa Cruz, 
A.G.Y., 2021, An Overview on the Use of Response Surface Methodology to Model and Optimize Extraction 
Processes in the Food Industry. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal, 9, 745-754 
DOI:10.12944/CRNFSJ.9.3.03 

Vermaak, I., Kamatou, G.P.P., Komane-Mofokeng, B., Viljoen, A.M. and Beckett, K., 2011, African seed oils of 
commercial importance—Cosmetic applications. South African Journal of Botany, 77, 920-933 
DOI:10.1016/j.sajb.2011.07.003 

Welford, L., Abad Jara, M.E. and Gericke, N., 2008, Tree of life: the use of marula oil in southern Africa. 
HerbalGram. 

Zharare, P. and Dhlamini, N., 2000, Characterization of marula (Sclerocarya caffra) kernel oil and assessment 
of its potential use in Zimbabwe. Journal of Food Technology in Africa, 5, 126-128. 

468

https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26082279
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie500672v
http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.9.3.03
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2011.07.003

	160Reddy.pdf
	Response Surface Analysis and Modeling of Sclerocarya Birrea kernel Oil Yield in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide