Microsoft Word - 66iervolino.docx


 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS  
 

VOL. 65, 2018 

A publication of 

 
The Italian Association 

of Chemical Engineering 
Online at www.aidic.it/cet 

Guest Editors: Eliseo Ranzi, Mario Costa 
Copyright © 2018, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 
ISBN 978-88-95608- 62-4; ISSN 2283-9216 

Evaluation of the Production of Starch from Bitter Cassava 
(Manihot utilissima) using Different Methodologies  

Luis F. Lopez-Diagoa, Kevin Castilloa, M.V. Vidala, Jorgelina Pasqualinob,  Pedro 
Meza-Castellara, Henry A. Lambis-Mirandaa* 

a
Process Engineering program. CIPTEC Research Group. Fundacion Universitaria Tecnológico Comfenalco.Cr44D N 30A, 

91, Cartagena, Bolivar, Colombia 
b
Environmental Engineering program. GIA Research Group. Fundacion Universitaria Tecnológico Comfenalco.Cr44D N 

30A, 91, Cartagena, Bolivar, Colombia.  
hlambis@tecnocomfenalco.edu.co 
 

Cassava is a shrub belonging to euphorbiaceous family, widely cultivated in South America, Africa and the 
Pacific because of its roots with starches of high nutritional value. There is a variety called Manihot utilissima 
or bitter cassava, which contains high concentrations of cyanogenic elements that make it unusable and 
poisonous raw material which avoided for human consumption, while the high concentrations of carbohydrates 
place it as a potential source of starch mainly for industrial use. The wet extraction method was used to get 
starch from bitter cassava (Manihot utilissima). A factorial (2x3) design was implemented for the experimental 
set up, with 2 levels of time and mincer speed and 2 for the temperature of H2O, with 2 independent 
replicates. The comparison with the dry extraction method was also studied, this method consists in drying the 
bitter cassava over night at 50ºC. The yield of starch obtained in wet method ranged from 17.2 to 39.4 g of 
starch (mean of 26.6 g) obtained from the original samples of 250 g of wet bitter cassava, yielding yields 
ranging from 6.88 to 15.76% (average 10.64%) of the dry mass. The results were then analysed using PAST 
software v3.16 for ANOVA statistical evaluation, trend and Pareto were used to determine optimal conditions 
for the extraction of starch by wet and dry methods. Once the assumptions for analysis of variance (ANOVA) 
were made, it was concluded that a higher yield of starch is obtained from lower speeds and time, whereas 
the temperature of H2O is not significant for the process, giving as optimal value for wet method = 0.0678762 
for 1/x of the yield of starch obtained, with a starch purity of 64.90% ± 1.21% ranging up to 85.37% ± 1.42%. 
The extraction of bitter cassava starch has demonstrated its potential for the use of this variety of cassava 
which generates an added value to the product. 

1. Introduction 

Cassava is a shrub belonging to euphorbiaceous family, widely cultivated in South America, Africa and the 
Pacific because of its roots with starches of high nutritional value. It is considered a functional component of 
food due to the health benefits it confers following its consumption (Ogbo and Okafor, 2015). There is a 
cassava variety called Manihot utilissima or bitter cassava, which contains high concentrations of cyanogenic 
elements that make it poisonous and thus unusable as raw material for human consumption. For this reason, 
bitter cassava cultivars have been employed mainly as an emergency famine food (Tumwesigye et al., 2017). 
However, its high carbohydrates concentrations place it as a potential source of starch mainly for industrial 
use. Starch obtained from cassava and bitter cassava, has numerous applications in the paper, textile, 
pharmaceutical (as excipient), adhesives, food (as thickener), water treatment (as coagulant), and polymer 
industries (Hernandez-Carmona et al., 2017).  
Starch and chemically modified starch based films have drawn considerable attention on food packaging 
owing to their attractive combination of price, environmental friendliness, and abundance (Owi et al., 2017). 
Natural biodegradable polymers can be obtained directly from starch rich agricultural product (like corn, 
potato, wheat, cassava, barley, and rice) and wastes, using different processes such as: extraction and 
plastification of agricultural materials rich in cellulose and starch; microbial production; chemical synthesis of 

613

                               
 
 

 

 
   

                                                  
DOI: 10.3303/CET1865103

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Please cite this article as: Lopez-Diago L., Castillo K., Vidal Mejia M.V., Pasqualino J., Meza-Catellar P., Lambis H., 2018, Evaluation of the 
production of starch from bitter cassava (manihot utilissima) using different methodologies., Chemical Engineering Transactions, 65, 613-618  
DOI: 10.3303/CET1865103 



source monomers; and chemical synthesis of synthetic monomers (Hernandez-Carmona et al., 2017). Starch 
from cassava has been used to obtain biopolymeric materials such as bio-derived films and food packaging 
film (Tumwesigye et al., 2017), green nanocomposites (Owi et al., 2017), thermoplastic starch blends with 
other biodegradable polymers (Fidelis et al., 2017), and starch/polyurethane dispersion blends for surface 
sizing agents (Rusman et al., 2017), among other applications. In this paper, we evaluate the experimental 
conditions (temperature, time and mincer speed) that increase the starch production from bitter cassava using 
the wet extraction method.  

2. Methodology 

2.1 Sample collection and preparation 

The bitter cassava or industrial cassava (Manihot utilissima) was collected in the rural area of San Jacinto 
town, department of Bolívar (North Coast of Colombia). For this research approximately 12 kg of cassava 
were collected and only the ones that did not present malformations or physical damages were used. 

2.2 Crude starch extraction procedure 

The starch extraction was carried out by two methodologies, called "dry" and "wet" with the objective of 
comparing their performance (Hernández-Carmona et al., 2017). The wet process (Figure 1) includes the 
following stages: root reception, washing, chopping and crushing, extraction, sedimentation, and drying: 
• Roots reception: bitter cassava was collected and transported immediately after harvest in order to avoid 
physiological and/or microbial deterioration. 
• Washing: the dust and dirt were removed from the surface with water; the cassava was then dried on 
adsorbent paper. 
• Chopping and crushing: the husks and roots were removed, the pulps (about 250 g) were manually minced 
at an average length of 3 cm, and then crushed with 250 ml water at different temperatures (25 and 40°C). 
• Extraction: the excess fibre or bagasse was separated with a sieve from the liquid phase, which contains the 
starch.  
• Decanting: the liquid phase was left to rest, and the starch was separated by density differences with the 
water in a decanter. Decanting time varied from 6 to 8 hours at room temperature (25ºC). The starch phase 
was then vacuum filtrated with filter paper (Whatman®) to remove the excess water for about 20 min until a 
semi-solid tablet was partially observed. 
• Drying: the starch was dried in a conventional laboratory oven at 40°C for 8 hours. 

 

Figure 1: Scheme of the bitter cassava starch extraction wet and dry procedures.  

2.3 Experimental Design 

The starch yield (w/w%) from bitter cassava was selected as the dependent variable while the crushing 
velocity (crushing machine), crushing time and temperature of the experiment were selected as the 
independent ones. A balanced 2

3 factorial design (Table 1) was used for experimental planning process, with 
2 crushing levels (low and high speed), 2 crushing time levels (2 and 6 min), and 3 independent replications 
taken at each of the 3×2 treatment combinations. The design size was N=2×4×3=24 (Montgomery, 2009). 

614



The results were later analysed with PAST v3.14 and STATGRAPHICS CENTURION XVI software (Hammer 
et al., 2001; Reyes et al., 2013) for statistical evaluation. A multifactor-way ANOVA test was performed to 
evaluate whether the crushing velocity, crushing time and the temperature affect the starch yield and if there 
are interactions between them. 

Table 1:  23 Factorial design.  

Factor  Experimental factor Levels Coded variable 
A Crushing velocity Low / High - / + 
B Crushing time 2 min / 6 min - / + 
C Temperature 25ºC / 40ºC - / + 

2.4 Product characterization 

2.4.1 Determination of starch purity and amylose/amylopectin ratio 

The Lane-Eynon volumetric method was used, based on the determination of the volume required to 
completely reduce a known volume of alkaline copper reagent. Methylene blue indicator was used to 
determine the final point (Storz and Steffens, 2004; Blanco et al., 2000). 

2.4.2 Iodine test 

The Lugol solution was prepared with 5 g of I2 and 10 g of KI diluted with 100 mL distilled water, giving a 
brown solution with total iodine concentration of 150 mg/mL. 

2.4.3 Colour determination 

The cassava starch samples were compared with a standard starch forming rectangles (2.5-5.0 cm length and 
1.6-3.5 cm height) with a spatula on a sheet of white paper, pressing the samples with a clean and fine paper 
to equalize the upper surface, and comparing the colour (Grace, 1977). 

2.4.4 Apparent density 

The starch samples were added with a spatula into a 250 ml graduated cylinder previously dried and weighed, 
until the total volume was freely completed, and then weighed again in order to calculate the density as the 
relationship between the sample mass an volume.  

2.2.5 Gelatinization temperature 

A starch suspension (10 g/100 mL) was prepared in cold water and doubled boiled at 85ºC, measuring the 
temperature until paste formation (Grace, 1977). 

2.2.6 pH  

A suspension was prepared with 20 g starch and 100 mL previously boiled distilled water. After 15 minutes the 
mixture was filtered through a Whatman® filter paper and the pH was measured to the liquid phase with a 
HANNA pH-meter. 

2.2.7 Ashes 

Ashes content was measured by incineration at 550°C during 3.5 hours. 

3. Results 

3.1 Starch yield from the wet extraction method 

Considering the experimental design (Table 1) 24 starch samples were obtained. The crude starch yield is 
presented in Table 2, ranging from 6.88% to 15.76%. 

3.2 Statistical summary about data distribution 

The descriptive statistical analysis and the variance analysis (multifactorial ANOVA) were implemented to the 
production of bitter cassava starch with the statistical software package PAST v3.16 to evaluate if the 
variables affect the starch yield and if there are interactions between them. Additional tests were carried out to 
verify the assumptions of data independence, data normality and homoscedasticity (Hammer et al., 2001; 
Montgomery, 2009). 

615



Table 2:  Summary of performance in wet methodology 

Crushing speed  Crushing time (min) Temperature (ºC) Crude starch yield (w/w%) 

   Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Mean 
Low 2 25 9.84 13.88 15.12 12.95 
Low 2 40 8.36 13.04 14.76 12.05 
Low 6 25 10.4 11.76 10.8 10.99 
Low 6 40 8.56 7.96 14.12 10.21 
High 2 25 13.0 6.96 7.88 9.28 
High 2 40 15.28 9.64 8.44 11.12 
High 6 25 9.4 7.4 6.88 7.89 
High 6 40 15.76 8.92 7.16 10.61 

 

Figure 2: Statistical results summary.  

A summary of the statistical results is presented in Figure 2, where it can be seen that the values of 
standardized bias and standardized kurtosis are within the range -2 to +2, which indicates that the data have a 
normal distribution. The value of Shapiro-Wilk must be within the acceptance zone (ZA) for the null hypothesis 
(H0), which must be formed by all the values of the test statistic Wexp which are lower than the expected or 
tabulated value W(1-α;n). ZA = Wexp < W(1-α; n). Since the value of Wexp=0.9026 is lower than the expected value 
W(0.95; 24)=0.916, the null hypothesis is accepted, concluding that there is a 95% confidence that the starch 
yield variable is not normally distributed. This could also be confirmed with the p(normal) value (p-
value=0.02448) which is lower than the level of significance (α=0.05), confirming that the distribution is not 
normal. Therefore, it is not possible to use tests that consider standard deviations until it is stabilized, which is 
done by transforming the dependent variable with either its neperian logarithm, base 10 logarithm, its inverse 
or its square root (Table 3). 

Table 3:  Correlation coefficients of transformations in order to normalize the data 

Coefficient  Value 
Normal 0.9613 
Ln X 0.9725 
Log10 X 0.9721 
1/X 0.9753 √X 0.9675 
 
Analysing the results obtained with the Shapiro-Wilk test, histogram and normal probability graph (Figure 2), it 
is necessary to stabilize (transform) the data resulting from the starch yield, which was done by applying the 
inverse of each of the data obtained in order to approximate it as much as possible to a normal distribution. 
This decision was taken according to the results from Table 3, once transformed. 

616



 

Figure 3: Statistical summary of the data after (1/X) transformation. 

In the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the response variable (Figure 3), 1/X yield of the starch obtained, 
each variable is analysed statistically and its effect on the model explaining the variation of each of them in the 
response. As shown in Table 4 there are, in this case, two effects that have a p-value of less than 0.05. This 
indicates that they are significantly different from zero with a confidence level of 95%, so they have a high 
impact on starch yield, while the other variables and/or their combinations do not have a significant effect on 
the response variable. 

Table 4: Multifactor ANOVA test for starch yield from bitter cassava 

Variable 
Source  

Square 
Summation 

 Degrees of
freedom 

Medium 
Squares 

F p-Values 

A 0.010412 1 0.010412 45.36 0.0000 
B 0.001473 1 0.001473 6.41 0.0222 
C 0.000528 1 0.000528 2.30 0.1488 
AB 0.000370 1 0.000370 1.61 0.2225 
AC 0.000498 1 0.000498 2.17 0.1601 
BC 0.000021 1 0.000021 0.09 0.7653 
ABC 0.000076 1 0.000076 0.33 0.5721 
Error 0.003673 16 0.000230 - - 
TOTAL 0.017052 23 - - - 

Since the p-value of these is less than α, it can be said that the differences between some of the means are 
statistically significant, so the null hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded that not all the population means 
are equal. The statistical value r2 of the model, thus adjusted, gives a value of 78.46% of the variability in 
performance. This is adjusted in a great way since it is higher than the 69.03% which is the most suitable in 
models with different number of independent variables.  
Equation 1 shows the optimal model of the variable (1/X):  
 1 0,0137996 0,0638877 0,0135389 0,00129068 0,00582842 0,00108332 0,000175280,000118942 																																																																																																																																													  
3.3 Product characterization 

Table 5: Properties comparisons  

Properties  Bitter cassava Cassava starch 
Density (g/mL) 0.572 1.560 
pH 4.42 4.5 - 5.5 
Gelatinization 
temperature (ºC) 

70 57.5 - 70 

% Amount of ashes 0.13 - 

The amount of amylose obtained varied between 66-69% while amylopectin was found between 30-33%. The 
starch obtained from bitter cassava contains high values in the content of amylose which favours a greater 

617



solubility, higher viscosity, better clarity of the paste and greater tendency to the retrogradation of the gels. 
The starch sample produced an intense blue colour corresponding to the starch according to the Iodine test. In 
addition, by the qualitative colour determination, neutral coloration (white) also corresponds to starch. The only 
significant difference, when compared to standard starch, is that the standard starch is much finer than the 
starch of bitter cassava. The product characterizacion is shown in Table 5, the density and the pH results are 
minimal lower in relation with cassava starch, the low density can be explained with the regular compaction of 
the starch. 

4. Conclusions 

Starch extraction from bitter cassava (Manihot utilissima) was carried by wet extraction method. The optimal 
conditions were evaluated using 23 factorial design. The starch yield was selected as the dependent variable 
while the crushing speed, crushing time and the temperature were selected as the independent ones. The 
starch yield was varied between 6.88% and 15.76%. ANOVA analysis results shown the variables with the 
greatest influence on the starch yield are the crushing speed (low velocity) and crushing time (2 min). The 
characterization tests show that, when compared to standard cassava starch, the starch obtained from bitter 
cassava has similarity in colour, apparent density, gelatinization temperature and pH. The high content of 
amylose present in the extracted starch can favour properties such as solubility, viscosity, paste and 
retrogradation of the final biopolymer. 

Acknowledgments  

This work was funded by the Fundación Universitaria Tecnológico Comfenalco – Cartagena (Resolution #318 
from October 28th 2014), as part of the project “Production and characterization of vegetable biopolymers 
based on banana and plantain peel wastes”. 

Reference  

Blanco M., Coello J., Iturriaga H., Maspoch S., González-Bañó R., 2000, On-line monitoring of starch 
enzymatic hydrolysis by near infrared spectroscopy, Analyst, 125, 749-752, DOI: 10.1039/A909248J 

Fidelis J. et al. 2017, Development of biodegradable films of cassava starch and poly (butylene adipate co-
terephthalate): effects of oregano essential oil and potassium sorbate in films characterization, Chemical 
Engineering Transactions, 57, 1969-1974, DOI: 10.3303/CET1757329 

Grace M.R., 1977, Cassava preparation (in Spanish), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United 
Nations, Rome, Italy, 116 p. 

Hammer O., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D., 2001, PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education 
and data analysis, Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 1-9, <https://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/> accessed 
10.6.2017 

Hernández-Carmona F., Morales-Matos Y., Lambis-Miranda H., Pasqualino J., 2017, Starch extraction 
potential from plantain peel wastes, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5(5), 4980-4985, 
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.09.034 

Montgomery D.C., 2009, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 7th ed., Wiley. New Jersey, USA. 
Ogbo F.C., Okafor E.N., 2015, The resistant starch content of some cassava based foods, Nigerian Food 

Journal, 33, 29–34, DOI:10.1016/j.nifoj.2015.04.007 
Owi W.T., Lin O.H., Sam S.T., Villagracia A.R., Santos G.N.C., 2017, Tapioca starch based green 

nanocomposites with environmental friendly cross-linker, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 56, 463-
468, DOI:10.3303/CET1756078 

Reyes I.A., Patiño F., Flores M.U., Narayanan J., Calderón H., Pandiyan T., 2013, Use of ligand-based iron 
complexes for phenol degradation by Fenton modified process, Journal of the Mexican Chemical 
Society, 57(2), 96-104, <www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/jmcs/v57n2/v57n2a5.pdf> accessed 15.01.2017 (in 
Spanish)  

Rusman R., Majid R.A., Wan Abd Rahman W.A., Low J.H., 2017, Carboxymethyl cassava starch/polyurethane 
dispersion blend as surface sizing agent, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 56, 1171-1176, 
DOI:10.3303/CET1756196  

Storz E., Steffens K., 2004, Feasibility study for determination of the dextrose equivalent (DE) of starch 
hydrolysis products with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), Starch/Stärke, 56, 58–62, 
DOI:10.1002/star.200300220 

Tumwesigye K.S., Sousa A.R., Oliveira J.C., Sousa-Gallagher M.J., 2017, Evaluation of novel bitter cassava 
film for equilibrium modified atmosphere packaging of cherry tomatoes, Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 
13, 1-14, DOI:10.1016/j.fpsl.2017.04.007 

618