Microsoft Word - cet-01.docx CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS VOL. 46, 2015 A publication of The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering Online at www.aidic.it/cet Guest Editors: Peiyu Ren, Yancang Li, Huiping Song Copyright © 2015, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l., ISBN 978-88-95608-37-2; ISSN 2283-9216 Advanced Detection Theory and Application Research of Multi-wave and Multi-component Seismic Exploration in Mine Yunbo Li*a, b, Hongling Pengb, Yanqing Wua, b a School of info-Physics and Geologic Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, P.R.China, b China Coal Science and Industry Group Chongqing Research Institute, Chongqing, 400039, P.R.China. lyb0112@163.com. According to the China coal mine geological structure advanced detection demand and need to solve the problems proposed a suitable in coal mine explosion-proof geological detector of multi-wave and multi- component seismic exploration technology, multi-channel data acquisition method in advance, we studied the formation of seismic exploration geological structure interpretation and inference principle, and use the technology and equipment in China's coal mining area of advance geological forecast detection research and application. The research results show that: the development of technology and equipment can accurately predict surrounding rock, rock breaking, and the rich water situation in front of the tunnel face; the max advanced detective range is 145 m. 1. Introduction At present, there are many deep and complicated working faces in coal mine, which can lead to the occurrence of various mine disasters, which greatly affect the safety of coal mine production. The main advanced detection methods in the field of mine geophysical prospecting in China are: mine geological radar detection technology, advanced detection technology, transient electromagnetic detection technology, etc.. The seismic wave advanced detection is widely used in the tunnel, the method according to fault and subsided column abnormal geological structure and surrounding the contact boundary density and velocity have obvious difference, combined with rock elastic and seismic wave field theory, which has forecast distance, detection effect is good. But in the coal mine is no relevant technology and equipment, the main problem focused on: limited space of whole space communication theory, explosion-proof technology, source problem, detecting instrument, inference and interpretation software etc.. To this end, the authors propose a set of coal mine explosion proof seismic wave geological advanced detection technology, and the use of related technology and equipment to carry out the application research, through the analysis of the results, in order to provide a reference for the long distance geological conditions in coal mine [BAOYU LI and NONG ZHANG (2014), CAI YINGKANG, LIU XIUFENG, SONG ENQIANG (2005), C WRIGHT, E.J WALLS,D DE J. CARNEIRO(2000) reported]. 2. The principle of the multi-wave and multi-component seismic advanced detection in the mine Seismic exploration pinpoints the location of the bad geological body through the acquisition of longitudinal wave and transverse wave data to calculate the coal and rock mechanical parameters. The working principle of multi-wave and multi-component seismic advanced detection uses the three-component reflection seismic method, three component acquisition seismic waves. Seismic exploration is similar to other reflection seismic method, the measuring principle of the echo. Seismic waves produced with a small amount of explosives in the focal point. Seismic wave in the form of spherical wave propagation in the coal and rock, when faced with petrol physical interface (that is, the interface wave impedance difference such as fault, rock fracture zone and collapse column structure), part of the seismic signal reflected, another part of the signal refraction into the front. The reflection of the seismic signal will be geophone receiving high sensitivity. Reflected signals travel DOI: 10.3303/CET1546113 Please cite this article as: Li Y.B., Peng H.L., Wu Y.Q., 2015, Advanced detection theory and application research of multi-wave and multi- component seismic exploration in mine, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 46, 673-678 DOI:10.3303/CET1546113 673 time and reflection interface is proportional to the distance, so can provide a direct measurement. As shown in figure l. Sensor 24 shot points Tunnel face Side Figure 1: The advanced detection principle diagram of DTC-150 The site layout and test process of DTC - 150 consists of a series of shot point, one or two 3 D receiving sensor (X, Y, Z direction), a receiver and a data processing system. The received signal in the high precision sensors, only the reflected signal from the front of the tunneling surface and side contains the information about the rocks ahead. By the travel time VP: Where X1 is the distance between the blasting hole and sensor; T1 is the time of direct longitudinal wave. The distances between reflective surface and sensor, drivage face can be deduced through the measured transmission time of reflection wave and known propagation velocity of seismic wave. pp V XX V XX T 12322 2 + = + = (1) Where T2 is the transmission time of the reflected wave; X2 is the distance between the blasting hole and the reflective surface; X3is the distance between the sensor and the reflective surface. According to the basic theory of seismic exploration, the propagation speed of the longitudinal wave Vp and the shear wave Vs is: )21)(1( )1(2 γγρ γ ρ μλ −+ − = + = E v p )1(2 γρρ μ + == E vs (2) Where λ is the lame coefficient; μ is modulus of rigidity; ρ is the density of rock; E is the Elastic Modulus of the rock; γ is the Poisson ratio. The relationship between the rock density and wave velocity is [LU JUN, WANG YUN, ZHAO WEI (2010), LI GUIHUA, ZHU GUANGMING, LI GUILIANG (2009), TENG JIWEN (2004) reported]: 2315.06 )10(439.1 −××= sp vvρ (3) It is obvious that if we know the speed of the longitudinal wave and the shear wave, the basic mechanical parameters of rock can be calculated according to the above formula. 3. The data acquisition of the multi-wave and multi-component seismic advanced detection and the interpretation principle of the adverse geological body 3.1 Field data acquisition methods After many experiments and engineering validation, data acquisition method, follow these steps [WEN ZHANG, JIA LUO (2013) reported]: Figure 2: Field data acquisition method ①Decorate the holes, must be the 24 blast holes according to requirements (Depth 1.5 m, spacing 1.5 m, height 1 m, aperture Φ 42 mm) and a receiving hole (Depth 2 m, apart from the 24 blast hole 16 m, height 1 m, aperture Φ 45 mm). ②Charge, each hole in 80 g emulsion explosive, must use the instantaneous detonator. ③Hole sealing, with the anchoring agent plugging 24 holes more than 600 mm, in order to reduce acoustic interference. 674 ④Detonation 24 shot points in turn, collect data at the same time. ⑤The acquisition work is over after 24 shot points detonated. 3.2 The interpretation principle of the adverse geological body To transmit collected data to the computer, through the special data processing software for processing, the velocity profiles of the rock mass’s vertical and horizontal wave and the change curve of the rock’s various basic parameters will be got. In combination with geological condition analysis of these curves, could get forecast results of hard and soft, the degree of joint development, watery degree, etc. [WANSOO HA, et al (2012), WANG QIREN (2004), WANG DIAN, et al (2006), XU CHANG, et al (2000) reported]. There are several interpretation principles through a large number of engineering examples and the comparative study of the geological data: ① Fault, fracture zone and collapse column Fault which is fracture and karst development zone that damaged rock mass integrity and continuity; the characteristic of the fracture zone depends on factors such as its material composition and degree of consolidation, etc.; the characteristic of the karst collapse column mainly depends on its composition, dry wet, silt content and other factors. The density difference is the obvious difference between them and the surrounding rock, with the different water level, has the different effect of elastic wave propagation. In depth migration profile, those geological bodies have strong positive and negative wave reflection; reduce the vertical wave velocity, density curve ups and downs; if water is abundant, the shear wave reflection was stronger than p-wave reflection, the velocity’s comparison of vertical and horizontal wave decreased, density increases; the static young's modulus is reduced, reflect the characteristics of the crack development, rock crushing. ② Soft rock Soft rock such as mudstone and coal measures strata, carbonaceous slate or serious weathering fracture zone, small density, low strength, to the depth migration profile, which is characterized by strong negative reflection to the strong positive reflection. ③ Water cut, water storage structure Fault fracture zone, unconformity surface and intrusive rock contact zone is often water-bearing structure. Loose structure, fracture development, rich in groundwater is their common characteristic, in the processing result, shear wave reflection stronger than p-wave reflection, p-wave velocity decreases, and shear wave velocity is not obvious changes, vertical and horizontal wave velocity ratio decreases, and the static young's modulus is reduced. There will be produced a positive reflection where the transition from soft rock into the water cut, water storage structure belt, the density increases. 4. The application of multi-wave and multi-component seismic advanced detection system in coal mines 4.1 The application of multi-wave and multi-component seismic advanced detection system in the Jin Mei Gu Shu Yuan coal mine The data collected form multi-wave and multi-component seismic advanced detection are shown in figure 3. The processing results in figure 3, reflection interface drawn in the form of line, there are abnormal material reflection interface in those locations. Figure 3: Raw data diagram and treatment results of Jin Mei Gu Shu Yuan coal mine 675 From the detection result, within the detection range is a clear geologic abnormal body interface. The stability of surrounding rock was poor in the scope of this geological forecast. It is mainly manifested in rock mass joint fracture development, the soft rock, the local water seepage. The large mined-out area didn’t find in the detection range [YANG SITONG, CHENGJIULONG (2010), YUNBING HU, YAO WANG, YANQING WU (2014), YUNBING HU, YAO WANG, YANQING WU (2014), YANNING YU, et al (2015) reported]. Rock stability is poorer, prone to fall-block and collapse, detailed forecast results are shown in table 1. After excavation, there are fault and fracture zone respectively in the front of the 46 m and 125 m, no omission. Table 1: The forecast result of Jin Mei Gu Shu Yuan coal mine Detection range (m) Predicted results 0~18 Soft lithology, Some developmental fracture, Fractured rock mass, Easy to collapse, Fall-block, The stability of surrounding rock is poor 18~43 Soft lithology, Local development fracture, Some fractured rock mass, Easy to fall-block. The stability of surrounding rock is poor 43~80 The change of Lithology is bigger, Rock mass density is relatively larger, Some developmental fracture, Some fractured rock mass, Easy to fall- block, May be faulty, The stability of surrounding rock is poor 80~120 Soft lithology, Some developmental fracture, Fractured rock mass , Easy to collapse, Fall-block, The stability of surrounding rock is poor 120~135 Soft lithology, Development fracture, A lot of broken rock mass, May be broken belt, Easy to collapse, Fall-block, The stability of surrounding rock is very poor 4.2 The application of multi-wave and multi-component seismic advanced detection system in Gui Zhou Weng a coal mine The data collected form multi-wave and multi-component seismic advanced detection system are shown in figure 4. The processing results in figure 4, reflection interface drawn in the form of line, there are abnormal material reflection interface in those locations. The tunnel face is the 0 m location in the detection results. According to the analysis processing, get the following conclusion: 21 m to 62 m in front of the working face within the scope of rock density is relatively large, but the joint fissure development relatively; 102 m in front of the working face exists a small fault; the rock density is high and complete from 102 m to 120 m; Other location which did not judge is not found abnormal. Detailed forecast results are shown in table 2. After excavation, there are fault in the front of 95 m, no omission. Figure 4: Raw data diagram and treatment results of Gui Zhou Wen An mine 676 Table 2: The forecast result of Gui Zhou Weng an coal mine Detection range (m) Predicted results 0~21 Lithology is better, Rock mass relatively strong and complete, The stability of surrounding rock is better 21~62 Rock mass density is relatively larger, Local development fracture, Local containing water, Some fractured rock mass, Easy to fall-block, The stability of surrounding rock is poor 62~102 Rock mass density is relatively larger, Some developmental fracture, Some fractured rock mass, Easy to fall-block, May be faulty, The stability of surrounding rock is poor 102~120 Rock mass density is relatively larger, Rock mass relatively strong and complete, The stability of surrounding rock is better 4.3 The application of multi-wave and multi-component seismic advanced detection system in recent years In Songzao Coal, Jingyuan Coal, Zheng coal group, Yangquan coal group using multi-component detection technology and equipment were repeatedly advance detection of geological conditions in the experiment. As shown in Table 3. The average accuracy of advanced detection technology is 92%, and the detection range is 145 M. Table 3: The detection and forecast result of recent years Detecting location Detecting time Predicted location Predicted results Verification results 8411 Inner tail roadway 2013.5.22 Abnormal 112m Fault Yes Abnormal 87m Fault Yes 8129 intake airway 2013.5.31 Abnormal 75m Nothing No Abnormal 120m Fault Yes 8129 Inner tail roadway 2013.6.5 Abnormal 36m fracture zone Yes Abnormal 89m fracture zone Yes Abnormal 139m fracture zone Yes 8129 intake airway 2013.6.7 Abnormal 57m fracture zone Yes Abnormal 126m fracture zone Yes 83207 Inner tail roadway 2013.6.29 Abnormal 110m Collapse column Yes 8411 Inner tail roadway 2013.7.17 Abnormal 20m fracture zone Yes Abnormal 40m fracture zone Yes 8411 Inner tail roadway 2013.8.8 Abnormal 50m Nothing No Abnormal 75m Fault Yes Abnormal 110m Fault Yes 83207 Inner tail roadway 2013.8.9 Abnormal 30m Collapse column Yes Abnormal 80m Collapse column Yes No. five belt Lane 2013.9.18 Abnormal 30m Collapse column Yes Abnormal 67m Collapse column Yes Abnormal 98m Collapse column Yes 8413 intake airway 2013.11.27 Abnormal 30m fracture zone Yes Abnormal 56m fracture zone Yes Abnormal 79m fracture zone Yes The south area two track roadway 2014.5.18 Abnormal 63m Fault Yes Abnormal 145m Fault Yes 83207 return air course 2014.6.24 Abnormal 60m Collapse column Yes Abnormal 89m Collapse column Yes 677 5. Conclusions Through analysis the seismic exploration theory of the multi-wave and multi-component in front of the paper and combined with the adverse geological interpretation principle for inversion interpretation of coal mines, from the forecast results are obtained: ① Detection range is above 100 m, the maximum detection range of 145 m. The average accuracy of advanced detection technology is 92%. ② It can accurately detect the fault, fracture of surrounding rock, rock fracture zone, and the water-rich circumstance, miss probability is low. Multi-component detection technology and equipment provide a more reliable means for coal mine long adverse geological advanced prediction. It must get extensive application in the coal mine for safety production. Acknowledgements The project is supported by National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2011ZX05040-002). References Cai Y.K., Liu X.F., Song E.Q., 2005, TSP geological system in use of coal mine production, West china exploration engineering, Vol. 12(4): 86-87, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5716.2005.04.045 Chang X., Liu Y.K., Wang H., Gao X., 2000, Rock mass structure analysis based on seismic velocity and attenuation images, Chinese science bulletin, Vol. 45 (13): 1211-1216, DOI: 10.1007/BF02886082 Ha W.S., Chung W.K., Park E.J., Shin C.S., 2012, 2-D acoustic Laplace-domain waveform inversion of marine field data, Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 190 (1): 421-428, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 246X.2012.05487.x Hu Y.B., Wang Y., Wu Y.Q., 2014, Study on seismic detection applied in mine advance and side, Applied mechanics and materials, Vols. 580-583, 1649-1652, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.580-583.1649 Hu Y.B., Wang Y., Wu Y.Q., 2014, Study on tunnel seismic detection applied in coal mine, Applied mechanics and materials, Vol. s 602-605, 1757-1760, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.602-605.1757 Li B.Y., Zhang N., 2014, Stability analysis and controlling scheme optimization on roadway driven along golf of fully mechanized top coal caving, Environmental and earth sciences research journal, Vol. 1(1): 17-22, DOI: 10.18280/EESRJ.010104. Li G.H., Zhu G.M., Li G.L., 2009, Wave field characteristics of seismic survey in coal mine roadway. Coal geology& exploration, Vol. 37(5): 54-57, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2009.05.013 Lu J., Wang Y., Zhao W., 2010, Quantitative prediction of water content in porosity in coal measure strata using three-component seismic data, Chinese journal of geophysics, Vol. 53(7): 1734-1740, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2010.07.025 Teng J.W., 2004, Opportunity challenge and developing frontiers geophysics in 21st century, Progress in geophysics, Vol. 19(2): 208-215, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2004.02.001 Wang Q.R., 2004, Progress in the geophysical exploration research on underground geological hazards, Progress in geophysics, Vol. 19(3): 497-503, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2004.03.003 Wand D., Liu C., Liu Y., Wang P.M., Xu Z., 2006, Study of the noise elimination methods in the reflection seismic exploration. Progress in geophysics, Vol. 21(3): 957-970, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004- 2903.2006.03.040. Wright C., Walls E.J., Carneiro D.De.J., 2000, The seismic velocity distribution in the vicinity of a mine tunnel at Thabazimbi, South Africa, Journal of applied geophysics. Vol. 44(4): 369-382, DOI: 10.1016/S0926- 9851(00)00014-8 Yang S.T., Cheng J.L., 2010, Numerical simulation of fore detecting with seismic in coal roadway and study of wave field characteristics, Journal of china coal society, Vol. 35(10): 1633-1637, DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2010.10.012 Yu Y.N., Xu Z.Y., Sun H.G., Luan H., 2015, Remote data communication technology of multi-sensor fusion in underground mine, Environmental and earth sciences research journal, Vol. 2(1): 7-12, DOI: 10.18280/EESRJ.020102 Zhang W.S., Luo J., 2013, Full-waveform velocity inversion based on the acoustic wave equation, American journal of computational mathematics, Vol. 03 (03): 13-20, DOI: 10.4236/ajcm.2013.33B003 678