Microsoft Word - 26jonassen.docx CCHHEEMMIICCAALL EENNGGIINNEEEERRIINNGG TTRRAANNSSAACCTTIIOONNSS VOL. 40, 2014 A publication of The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering www.aidic.it/cet Guest Editor: Renato Del Rosso Copyright © 2014, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l., ISBN 978-88-95608-31-0; ISSN 2283-9216 Removal of Phenol from Water by Adsorption onto Sewage Sludge Based Adsorbent Salim Bousbaa,b, Abdeslam Hassen Meniai*b a Département de Pétrochimie et de Génie des Procédés, Faculté de Technologie, Université 20-Août-1955 Skikda, BP 26 Route d’El-Hadayek, Skikda 21000, Algérie b Laboratoire de l’Ingénierie des Procédés d’Environnement (LIPE), Faculté de Génie des Procédés Pharmaceutiques, Université Constantine 3, Constantine 25000, Algérie * meniai@yahoo.fr The aim of this study is to evaluate the adsorption performances of sewage sludge based adsorbent SSBA for the removal of phenol from water. The SSBA was prepared by chemical activation with H2SO4 in a mass ratio of 1:1, followed by a pyrolysis at 650°C for 1 h under inert atmosphere. Phenol removal by SSBA was investigated using kinetic and equilibrium experiments. The results demonstrate that phenol sorption to the SSBA reached equilibrium at 2 h with the maximum sorption capacity of 26.16 mg.g-1 under given experimental conditions (initial Phenol concentration range = 40–200 mg.l-1; adsorbent dose = 5.0 g.l-1 and temperature = 20°C). The phenol removal was high and relatively constant at (pHpKa).The results indicate that the pseudo second order model was suitable for describing the kinetic data. Regarding the equilibrium data, the Freundlich isotherm was fitted well. This study demonstrates that SSBA could be used for phenol removal from water. 1. Introduction Phenol is a toxic weak acid causes an unpleasant taste and odour even at low concentrations in water (Podkościelny and László, 2007). The major sources of phenol pollution in the aquatic environment are wastewaters from paint, pesticide, coal conversion, polymeric resin, petroleum and petrochemicals industries. Introducing phenolic compounds into the environment or degradation of these substances means the appearance of phenol and its derivatives in the environment. The chlorination of natural waters for disinfection produces chlorinated phenols. Phenols are considered as priority pollutants since they are harmful to organisms at low concentrations (Ahmaruzzaman, 2008). Treatment of wastewater containing phenol is a very important need for environmental protection and has been studied by various techniques such as chemical oxidation, biodegradation, membrane filtration, electro coagulation, solvent extraction, photo degradation and adsorption. Among these techniques adsorption is still the most popular and widely used technique for phenol removal. This work focuses on the removal of phenol from water using a low cost adsorbent prepared from sewage sludge by chemical activation with sulphuric acid. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Raw sewage sludge Fresh sewage sludge was collected from an urban Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) of Constantine town, in the Northeast of Algeria. The influent treated is mainly domestic and the plant use biological treatment process with activated sludge. The sludge used in this study was dewatered surplus sludge collected from a sun drying bed, traditionally used as a farmland fertilizer. 2.2 Preparation of the sewage sludge based adsorbent (SSBA) Collected sample was air dried at 105°C until constant weight. The resulting solid was ground and sieved through 1 mm mesh. Dried sludge was impregnated in (3M) H2SO4 solution with the mass ratio of 1:1. The DOI: 10.3303/CET1440040 Please cite this article as: Bousba S., Meniai A.H., 2014, Removal of phenol from water by adsorption onto sewage sludge based adsorbent, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 40, 235-240 DOI: 10.3303/CET1440040 235 mixture was magnetically stirred in a beaker for 48 h at ambient temperature. Then, the excess solution was decanted off and the precursor was air dried at 105°C for another 48h. After that, 15 g of chemical activated sample was placed into a covered ceramic crucible and placed in another big crucible. The cavity between the two crucibles was filled up with fuel coke particles <1 mm, to prevent O2 from entering the ceramic crucible during pyrolysis operation (Gascó et al., 2005). Then, the sample was pyrolyzed in a muffle furnace. The furnace temperature was gradually increased to 650°C at a rate of 10°C/min, and the final temperature of 650°C maintained for 1 h. After being pyrolyzed, the sample was washed with 3.0 M HCl to remove the acid-soluble inorganic impurities. Then, the sample was thoroughly washed with hot distilled water until constant pH was reached. After that, the sample was dried at 105°C for 24 h to constant weight. The resulting solid was grounded and sieved to a particle size of 0.125 mm. Finally the powder was stored in desiccators for further use. 2.3 Adsorbate Phenol (C6H5OH) of analytical grade (supplied by Panreac, Spain), was used for the preparation of the stock solution (1.0 g.l-1). The experimental solutions of various initial concentrations (C0) were prepared by diluting stock solution to the desired concentrations. 2.4 Characterization of SSBA The BET surface area of porous SSBA was estimated from adsorption-desorption of N2 at 77.4 K using a Quantachrome NOVA-e2200 analyzer. The pHPZC (point of zero charge) of SSBA was determined according to the procedure described by (Lopez-Ramon et al., 1999). 2.5 Adsorption tests Batch Adsorption tests of phenol were carried out in brown dark bottles (to reduce photo-oxidation of phenol). The total volume of the reaction solution was kept at 20ml. The stoppred bottles were magnetically shaken at 300 rpm until equilibrium was reached in a thermostat water bath shaker. Blank sorption experiments were performed in the absence of adsorbent, and no sorption of phenol by the walls of the bottles occurred. The effect of solution pH on the removal of phenol was investigated over the pH range from 2–13. The initial solution pH was adjusted using 0.1 and 1.0 N HCl or 0.1 and 1.0 N NaOH. Adsorption equilibrium experiments were performed by stirring 20 ml of phenol aqueous solution with initial concentration of 40–200 mg.l−1 in each bottle containing 100 mg of SSBA. The solutions were agitated at different temperatures 20, 30 and 55 °C, respectively. Adsorption kinetic experiments were basically identical to those of equilibrium tests. The aqueous samples were taken out at some intervals. After adsorption, the adsorbent samples were separated by centrifugation at 4000 rpm during 15 min and the supernatants liquids were analyzed for residual phenol concentration using a double-beam spectrophotometer, Shimadzu, model UV-160, at wavelength of 270 nm. The amount of phenol adsorbed onto per gram of adsorbent (qe) and the percentage removal efficiency (R %) were calculated using Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively. (1) (2) Where C0 and Ce are initial and equilibrium phenol concentrations, respectively (mg.l -1), V is phenol solution volume (l), m is the mass of adsorbent (g). 3. Results and discussion 3.1 Characteristics of SSBA The resulting SSBA shows an acceptable development of the specific surface area (162.2 m2/g) compared to the raw sludge which is a non-porous material (< 1 m2/g). The surface area of the SSBA is relatively small compared to those of the Commercial Activated Carbon (CAC). The pHPZC of SSBA (4.66) indicate that the adsorbent is an acidic material. Therefore, the adsorbent surface is positively charged at pH< 4.66 and negatively charged at pH> 4.66. 236 3.2 Effect of contact time and initial phenol concentration The effect of contact time on the rate of phenol removal was investigated at different initial concentrations (50, 100 and 200 mg.l−1) as shown in Figure 1(a).The results indicate that the contact time to reach equilibrium is approximately 120 min for all experiments. Therefore, the chosen contact time of 180 min, used in our experiments, is sufficient to reach equilibrium. It was observed that the adsorption process is extremely fast. In fact, for all experiments more than 77% of the equilibrium adsorption capacity was reached within the first minute. The initial fast adsorption is probably due to the special one-atom-thick layered structure of SSBA, which makes phenol contact immediately with the active sites on the surface of SSBA. With further increasing time, the diminishing availability of the remaining active sites and the decrease in the driving force make it take long time to reach equilibrium. Figure 1(a) also showed that the equilibrium adsorption capacity increased from 9 to 23 mg.g−1 with the increasing initial phenol concentration from 50 to 200 mg.l−1. When the initial concentrations increased, the mass transfer driving force became larger and the interaction between phenol and adsorbent was enhanced, hence resulting in higher adsorption capacity. Figure 1: (a) Effect of contact time on the adsorption of phenol (adsorbent dose = 5 g.l−1; initial pH 7.0; T= 20°C) (b) Determination of the optimal dose of SSBA (C0 = 50 mg.l -1; initial pH 7.0; T= 20°C; t = 3h) 3.3 Effect of adsorbent dose The effect of adsorbent dose on the adsorption capacity (qe) and the removal percentage (R%) of phenol was studied and is shown in Figure 1(b). As the SSBA dose was increased from 0.25 to 20 g.l−1, the percentage of adsorbed phenol increased from 10.84 % to 99.76%, whereas the adsorption capacity decreases from 22.18 to 2.55 mg g-1. Above 5.0 g.l−1 of adsorbent dose, there was no significant increase in the removal rate of phenol, but the adsorption capacity decreased rapidly. Considering qe and R%, adsorbent dose of 5.0 g.l−1 was found to be the optimum SSBA dose and was used for all other experiments. 3.4 Effect of pH Solution pH is one of the most important parameters to determine the adsorption property of an adsorbent due to its effect on the surface charge of the adsorbent and on the degree of ionization of adsorbate. Phenol as a weak acid with pKa = 10 and it dissociates at pH > pKa, the percentage of the molecular form of phenol can be calculated from the Eq(3). (3) Pm(%) is the percentage of molecular phenol in the solution. From Eq(3) it can be seen that phenol is mainly in molecular form at pHpKa. In this study the effect of solution pH on the removal of phenol was investigated over the initial pH range from 2–13. The effect of phenol speciation on the adsorption is better explained by calculating the Pm(%) using Eq(3) at different final pH (pH at equilibrium) values and a plot of the Pm(%) and percent of phenol removal (%R) versus final pH are shown in Figure 2(a) which clearly shows that phenol removal is pH independent at pHpKa (phenol is mainly in ionic form). In fact when phenol is mainly in molecular form, R% value is higher and constant (R ≈ 80 %) and as the pH is increased (pH>pKa), the phenol ionic form increases which implicate a rapid decrease in R% 237 until it reaches its smallest value of 21% when Pm(%) was practically negligible 1 % at final pH 12. The decrease of R% value when pH>pKa is due to the presence of electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged adsorbent surface (pH >pHPZC) and phenol ionic form. Even though the electrostatic repulsion at final pH 12, a significant removal of 21 % takes place indicating that chemisorption might be involved in the process, similar results were reported by (Bousba and Meniai, 2013) in the case of 2-chlorophenol removal by SSBA. Figure 2: (a) Effect of pH on the removal of phenol (C0 = 100 mg.l -1; T= 20°C; t = 3 h) (b) Langmuir isotherm representation for the adsorption of phenol onto SSBA (T= 20, 30 and 55°C; t = 3 h; C0 = 40-200 mg.l-1) 3.5 Isotherm analysis Several models have been published in the literature to describe the equilibrium adsorption systems. In this paper adsorption isotherms were fitted by the two classical models of Langmuir and Freundlich. Langmuir: (4) where qm (mg.g −1) is the theoretical maximum monolayer adsorption capacity at the constant temperature, and b (l.mg−1) is the Langmuir constant related to the energy of adsorption. The essential features of the Langmuir isotherm can be expressed in terms of a dimensionless separation factor RL, which is expressed as: (5) where b is Langmuir constant (l.mg−1) and C0 is maximum initial phenol concentration (mg.l −1). The value of RL indicates the shape of Langmuir isotherm to be either unfavorable (RL >1), linear (RL =1), irreversible (RL=0), or favorable (0 0.999). On the other hand, the calculated values of qe obtained from the pseudo second order model agreed perfectly with the experimental values of qe at three initial concentrations, respectively. An analysis of the data in Table 4 suggests that the kinetics of adsorption of phenol onto SSBA can be explained accurately by the PSO kinetic model. Table 4: The PFO and PSO kinetic parameters for the adsorption of phenol onto SSBA C0 (mg.l-1) qe exp (mg.g−1) pseudo first-order model PFO pseudo second-order model PSO k1 (min−1) qe cal (mg.g−1) R2 k2 (g.mg−1min−1) k2qe (min-1) qe cal (mg.g−1) R2 50 9 0.13 8.90 0.8805 0.0978 0.88 9.05 0.9999 100 15 0.07 10.19 0.5971 0.0560 0.85 15.09 0.9998 200 23 0.16 64.00 0.8430 0.0920 2.11 23.02 0.9999 4. Conclusions The adsorption of phenol from water using SSBA activated with H2SO4 was investigated. Various experimental parameters such as contact time, adsorbent dose, initial phenol concentration, temperature and solution pH were optimized. The adsorption was found to be highly influenced by initial phenol concentration and phenol speciation which is directly related to solution pH. Equilibrium study show that the data fit very well in the Freundlich equation of multilayer adsorption but showed small deviation with the Langmuir equation, this result indicate the heterogeneity of the adsorbent surface. The values of R2 obtained from pseudo second-order model were higher than 0.999, indicating that the adsorption process obeyed the pseudo second-order model. Finally the adsorption experiments indicated that sewage sludge based adsorbent SSBA was efficient adsorbent for the removal of phenol from water. References Ahmaruzzaman, M., Sharma, D.K., 2005. Adsorption of phenols from wastewater. J.Colloid Interface Sci. 287, 14–24. Ahmaruzzaman, M., 2008. Adsorption of phenolic compounds on low-cost adsorbents: A review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 143, 48–67. Bousba, S., Meniai, A.H, 2013, Adsorption of 2-chlorophenol onto sewage sludge based adsorbent: Equilibrium and kinetic study. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 35, 859-864. Gascó, G., Blanco, C.G., Guerrero, F., Lázaro, A.M.M., 2005. The influence of organic matter on sewage sludge pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 74, 413–420. Gupta, V.K., Ali, I., Saini, V.K., 2004. Removal of chlorophenols from wastewater using red mud: an aluminum industry waste. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 4012–4018. Hamdaoui, O., Naffrechoux, E, 2007. Modeling of adsorption isotherms of phenol and chlorophenols onto granular activated carbon: Part I. Two-parameter models and equations allowing determination of thermodynamic parameters.Journal of Hazardous Materials, 147(1), 381-394. Lopez-Ramon M.V., Stoeckli F., Moreno-Castilla C., Carrasco-Marin F., 1999, On the characterization of acidic and basic surface sites on carbons by various techniques. Carbon, 37, 1215-1221. Podkościelny, P., László, K., 2007. Heterogeneity of activated carbons in adsorption of aniline from aqueous solutions. Applied Surface Science, 253 (21), 8762-8771. Sarkar, M., Acharya, P.K., 2006. Use of fly ash for the removal of phenol and its analogues from contaminated water. Waste Manag. 26, 559–570. Srivastava, V.C., Swamy, M.M., Mall, I.D., Prasad, B., Mishra, I.M., 2006. Adsorptive removal of phenol by bagasse fly ash and activated carbon: equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 272,89–104. 240 Controfacciata.pdf Pagina vuota Pagina vuota Pagina vuota