







































Children and Teenagers 
ISSN 2576-3709 (Print) ISSN 2576-3717 (Online) 

Vol. 1, No. 1, 2018 
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ct 

63 
 

Original Paper 

The Boy Who Wouldn’t Eat Pomegranates (an Attention-Deficit 

Hyperactivity Disorder, ADHD, Allegory) 
Anthony A. Zehetner1,2* 

1 Adolescent Medicine Unit, the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia 
2 Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia 
* Anthony A. Zehetner, Adolescent Medicine Unit, the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, 

Australia 

 

Received: April 30, 2018          Accepted: May 15, 2018         Online Published: May 24, 2018 

doi:10.22158/ct.v1n1p63                          URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/ct.v1n1p63 

 

Abstract 

An allegorical vignette describing the pathway of diagnosis and treatment of controversial societal 

disorders which may exist in children, using Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) as an 

example and template. The child’s perspective is described as well as potential pitfalls of the 

“therapeutic” process beyond simple clinical modalities. Finally the impact of such practice is 

questioned at a societal level and is made relevant to our contemporary understanding of Medicine. 

Keywords 

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), bias, categorical, diagnosis, Diagnostic and 

Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), dimensional, Evidence-Based Medicine, misdiagnosis, 

Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) 

 

1. Introduction 

In the following article, please read the text first, ignoring descriptors contained within brackets “[]”. 

A recent study of American physicians (Peckham, 2016) found those aged over 46 years reported that 

biases affect patient treatment negatively; they offer less time and are less friendly. For physicians aged 

45 years or younger, the reverse holds, with biases resulting in more positive patient interactions. As I 

approach that notational milestone, I ponder whether my clinical experiences improve or hinder my 

skills as a doctor. 

 

 

 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ct                        Children and Teenagers                        Vol. 1, No. 1, 2018 

 
64 

Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

 

2. Method 

2.1 Diagnosis as a Cultural Concept 

Critique and skepticism are essential elements in the practice of Medicine. Any theory is only as strong 

as its ability to withstand critical appraisal. In his divisive work (2014), Craig Newnes (retired editor of 

the Journal of Critical Psychology, Counseling and Psychotherapy and Director of Psychological 

Therapies for Shropshire, UK) asks some uncomfortable questions. He asserts that under the aegis of 

scientism, “branding” (diagnostic labels and drugs) and the Psy-complex professions; there lies much 

hypocrisy, self-interest and confusion. While some of it may be dismissed as a rant against the status 

quo, consumerism and his own professional identity, Newnes challenges current mental health service 

provision, the “drive to prescribe” and reiterates the importance of culture and perspective in patient 

care. Do you see what I see? 

2.2 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) 

The doctor-patient relationship is inherently unbalanced, principally in the field of medical knowledge 

and the power of providing a diagnosis. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 

(DSM-5, American Psychiatric Association, 2013) is the most widely accepted nomenclature used by 

clinicians and researchers for the classification of mental disorders. To be able to diagnose mental 

illness it is implied that one must have faith in one’s tools, yet many doctors do not (Cassels, 2014). 

2.3 Case Study, Billy 

Consider Billy, the boy labeled as the “boy who wouldn’t eat pomegranates”. We might describe Billy 

categorically as a pomegranate eater or not [has Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, ADHD, or 

not]; or in a dimensional context: he likes them sometimes [he can’t concentrate if he hasn’t had 

enough sleep and/or there is a lot of background activity or noise]. 

It might be that pomegranates are an accepted staple of societal diet and to not eat them is an anomaly 

(such as being a teetotaler in an alcohol-using society). There may be a push to consume them or buy 

them [fill a prescription]. At school, if all of the other kids are eating pomegranates, should you too 

(even if you don’t need to?) [societal “peer pressure”]. 

 

3. Result 

Belonging is a basic human need. It drives our emotions and not fitting-in adversely affects one’s 

self-esteem, mood and daily functioning. Many aspects of our lives are beyond our volitional control: 

genetics, intellectual ability, learning style, sensory preferences and personality trait(s). 

Doctors might extol the nutritional, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory virtues of eating pomegranates 

[Evidence-based Medicine] and formulate dietary [read as ADHD treatment] guidelines. Since 

pomegranates are deemed to be so good to daily health and rated as “safe”, public health officials 

and/or politicians may consider supplementing them in other foods and even the water supply [Public 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ct                        Children and Teenagers                        Vol. 1, No. 1, 2018 

 
65 

Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

 

Health policy/Population Medicine]. If Billy mentions that he is allergic or intolerant to pomegranates, 

some may not believe him and he risks being excluded and stigmatized [food allergies/intolerances]. 

Why is he being so “difficult” against all of the “evidence” [moral objectors to immunization]? What 

makes Billy so “special”? Who is ostracising whom? 

Maybe it’s all down to Billy’s parents. They liked pomegranates when they were kids and grew up 

eating pomegranates so he should too. After all, they say that pomegranates never did them any harm 

[doctor’s personal perspective]! Maybe Billy doesn’t eat pomegranates now because he was force-fed 

them too often as a child? He probably will make his own mind up about them one day (like going to 

church and religion) but because he is not yet a “mature minor”, for now his parents have the right to 

decide what Billy eats or not. Billy doesn’t think that is fair—it’s his body after all, he counters. This 

antagonism means that Billy is labeled with Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Maybe he just 

doesn’t like the seeds? 

Because Billy refuses to cooperate and eat pomegranates at school, his teachers describe him as 

“disruptive” and requiring 1:1 attention. They suggest he sees a doctor. Billy’s father is irritated by this 

and doesn’t think there is a problem. He feels the teacher should mind her own business. Dad’s brother 

(Billy’s paternal uncle) was just like this when he was Billy’s age. Billy’s mother is a little 

overwhelmed and mildly embarrassed as they didn’t have this problem with his siblings [again social 

stigma]. 

All this talk makes Billy start to worry that there may be something wrong with him; like his sense of 

taste [vision] and smell [hearing] don’t work, but his parents had those tested and they were found to be 

normal. So what if he likes the taste of lychees [atypical, kinaesthetic learner] over pomegranates; 

many of his friends do too! He is told that he will see a specialist doctor [paediatrician] and will have 

the day off school. Billy wonders if it matters whether the doctor he will see likes pomegranates or not 

[subjective specialist’s viewpoint]. 

The doctor can’t tell whether Billy’s dislike for pomegranates is a genetic or environmental determinant. 

He could prescribe some pomegranate vitamins (so Billy doesn’t have to eat the raw fruit) but his 

parents think this is an easy way out, too expensive, “unnatural” (“he is too young to be on medication” 

they cry) and doesn’t it just caters to his behaviour and not “fix” the problem? Apparently they knew of 

a case where one child went on the tablets and now wouldn’t eat anything [adverse effects, making the 

matter worse]! Grandma weighs in and says that she never had this problem in her day. “Too few 

boundaries”, she chides and goes back to smoking [lack of personal insight into health determinants of 

others]. Billy feels that smoking is worse than not eating pomegranates, but they don’t listen to him 

[often a child’s opinion and autonomy are correct but not factored into their health care decisions]. 

At school the bullying starts and people even throw a pomegranate at Billy which splatters his clothes. 

The red juice looks like blood though it distracts people from noticing his tears. Billy has never really 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ct                        Children and Teenagers                        Vol. 1, No. 1, 2018 

 
66 

Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

 

liked school or had anything against pomegranates, though some of his best friends do like them 

[spectrum of disorder severity and treatment tolerance]. The bullying does make Billy feel sick in the 

mornings and he doesn’t attend some days [onset of secondary anxiety, possible treatment-related 

negative effects]. 

Billy is taken to see another specialist [psychologist] who will perform taste-testing [psychometric 

assessments] to see if he has a “sensory deficit” or a “processing disorder”. Most of the test samples 

taste similar to Billy [imprecise testing process] and after a while he just chooses any answer to make 

the process end quicker [false-positive results]. One of Billy’s friends has a totally different idea about 

what constitutes palatable food and yet they are both “diagnosed” with the same condition 

[Predominantly Inattentive and Hyperactive-Impulsive ADHD have different phenotypes though are 

classified as the same disorder, ADHD]! Maybe the specialist’s test samples have gone out of date and 

need to be updated [revalidation]? Maybe they used the Asian umami sample during the consultation 

and not the Australian (sweet, salty, bitter and sour) ones [population error]? There are other tests out 

there which are suggested Billy should complete but they are very expensive [poor access to 

appropriate health care] and Billy is not very interested [“assessment fatigue”]. His classmates keep 

asking why he is taken out of school so often [disruption to schooling due to frequent medical 

appointments and ostracisation]. 

As Billy isn’t taking the pomegranate vitamin supplement (he tried them unwillingly for a few days but 

they “didn’t work”) [lack of appropriate treatment duration, e.g., three months with atomoxetine], the 

doctor wants to trial a medicine which will change the signals in his taste buds so that pomegranates are 

more palatable [restore “chemical imbalance”/neurotransmitter function]. Billy would take these until 

he develops a taste for pomegranates on his own over time [pre-frontal cortex maturation with age]. It 

all sounds like the same thing to Billy. So that he doesn’t have to go to more specialists and take 

medicines, Billy agrees to start eating pomegranates [reluctant assent to therapy in children]. He is 

actually only pretending to and is secretly throwing them away [poor adherence to medication regimens 

in adolescence]. However the plan seems to be working as it gets his parents and teachers off his back 

and they all think that Billy is now doing well [placebo effect]. Maybe Billy never needed to eat 

pomegranates in the first place [misdiagnosis] and should have just pretended to [societal conformity]? 

 

4. Discussion 

If you re-read the story, replacing ADHD for not eating pomegranates and now substituting the 

descriptors contained within the brackets, the narrative “journey” and zeitgeist for the condition is 

paralleled. Actually, any condition and treatment for which controversy and societal discord exist may 

be used, e.g., gluten-intolerance, Lyme Disease, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), etc. 

The real tragedy is that Billy is labeled as “the boy who wouldn’t eat pomegranates”, as if it was totally 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ct                        Children and Teenagers                        Vol. 1, No. 1, 2018 

 
67 

Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

 

his choice to act in that manner. Rather it would have been more apt for Billy to be referred to as “the 

boy who didn’t eat pomegranates” as that is a description of his behaviour and does not involve a 

judgment or value statement.   

As doctors age, we should continue to question the tenements, ideals and philosophy of the profession 

we have dedicated our lives to. We must ensure that we, and our patients, are open to new ideas and do 

not become “fussy eaters” [rejecters of new Medical information which may be against accepted 

“norms”]. We must also respect that our tastes differ, as do those of the next generation. 

And we haven’t even mentioned the pomegranate sellers [Big Pharma]! 

 

References 

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Satistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th 

ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. 

https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 

Cassels, C. (2014). One Third of Psychiatrists not Using DSM-5. Medscape. Retrieved April 30, 2018, 

from http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/830099 

Newnes, C. (2014). Clinical Psychology: A Critical Examination (1st ed.). Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books. 

Peckham, C. (2016). Medscape Lifestyle Report 2016: Bias and burnout. Medscape. Retrieved April 30, 

2018, from http://www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/lifestyle/2016/public/overview 

 
 

 


