





































61

AN ECLECTIC SCHOOLTEACHER: 
DOROTHY HOWARD AS APPLIED FOLKLORIST

JAN ROSENBERG

I met Dorothy Gray Mills Howard (1902-1996) in 1983 at the annual meeting of the 
Association for the Anthropological Study of Play in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. She 
was dressed in a bright blue suit, her head framed by brilliant white hair. She was 
80 years old. She was in attendance to receive an achievement award from TAASP. 
I recognized her by her name tag. I introduced myself, and we talked about the 
meeting, by which she was impressed. But she didn’t understand why she was 
getting this award; perhaps she felt a kind of Texas humility.

My next contact with her was in 1989. I had been studying her writings and 
called her to talk about them. It was then that I learned she had had a hard time 
with institutions, naming some whose journals she felt had ripped her off. She 
gave me her blessing to study her published work. I didn’t do so until 2000, when 
I received a Traditional Arts Growth (TAG) grant from the National Endowment for 
the Arts. Then I went to the University of North Texas, which was once the North 
Texas State College for Teachers. By this time Howard had passed away, and all of 
her work was available for study.

On my way to Denton, I drove over to Lone Oak, the place where Howard 
grew up. This small community had a convenience store and a church. Other than 
those gathering places, the community seemed empty, like a place people called 
home after a day at work, wherever that might be (Dallas? Garland? Fort Worth? 
Denton?).

The following is an examination of Dorothy Howard’s work in light of the 
intersection of children’s folklore and folklore and education. I will illustrate 
Howard’s approaches to education and folklore with an eye on her progressive 
stance and child-centeredness. I will suggest that Howard be viewed as an 
educator and as a folklorist, a scholar of expressive culture and a guide through 
language arts in exploring the whole child. In other words, Dorothy Howard was a 
pioneer applied folklorist. 

The work of Dorothy Howard has been thoughtfully chronicled by Sylvia Ann 
Grider (1994). In her Children’s Folklore Review article, Grider outlines Howard’s 
early journey as a teacher, beginning at age seventeen, when she was asked to 
take over the class of a teacher who had died during the Great Flu Epidemic, and 
ending with her position as professor at Frostburg State Teachers College (1944-
1967), now known as Frostburg State University. She made a year-long stop in 
Australia, where she had a Fulbright Fellowship to document children’s folklore in 
another English speaking country. 

Pedagog in Embryo

Dorothy Gray Mills was born on 8 July 1902 and was reared in the Sabine Bottoms 
of east Texas. She went to school in the Bottoms region until she transferred 

CFR_2006-07_R3.indb   61 11/6/08   11:46:14 AM



AN ECLECTIC SCHOOLTEACHER ROSENBERG

62

to a high school in Denton, Texas, approximately forty miles north of Dallas/
Fort Worth. When asked to take over the class of a deceased teacher, Howard 
immediately latched on to the child-centeredness approach and asked the students 
to write her a letter about themselves to which she would respond individually. 
In this lesson she conveyed the form of letter writing, using the students’ own 
interests. 

Mills graduated from North Texas State Teachers College in 1923 with a B.S. 
in education and a permanent certificate to teach in Texas schools. In 1925 she 
married James Howard. She had two children and went east to teach school in 
New York and New Jersey, where she taught the middle grades, then moved to 
western Maryland to teach at Frostburg State Teachers’ College. 

As a progressive educator, she believed that the child develops naturally 
according to the way he or she perceives the whole environment. Very much in 
line with John Dewey (Dewey 1916), Howard was able to toe the curricular line 
with an individual’s eye, using the experiences of her students.1

For example, in Howard’s essay “On Our Own In the Classroom” (1941), 
Danny is having trouble with her writing assignment. Howard reminds him of an 
earlier essay in which he wrote about his mother making spaghetti. Danny lights 
up and starts to tell how his mother made ravioli. Howard acts as his scribe until 
he feels more comfortable writing. In “The Bell Always Rang” (1940), the students 
play a game with the parts of speech until one student asks another how she 
spells her name. From there the students move into researching their surnames 
for historical information. The grammar lesson turns into a spelling lesson and a 
personal history excursion as students share information on their names.

Howard was progressive, though she didn’t like to assign any label to herself, 
as she told me in 1989. She saw the child as she or he was, and this is a hallmark 
of the thinking of progressive education. Indeed, this educational approach 
involves a balance between the child and the environment, the lessons given, and 
the lessons experienced.

In fact, Howard and progressive educators were very much on the same level. 
According to historian of education Lawrence Cremin, progressive education 
embraced seven principles in a progressive learning situation: 

1. Freedom to develop naturally
2. Interest, the motive of all work
3. Teacher as a guide, not as a task master
4. Scientific study or pupil development
5. Greater attention to all that affects the child
6.  Cooperation between school and home to meet the needs of 

childlife
7.  The progressive school a leader in educational movements (1961, 

243-245)2

Howard followed each principle in a natural flow. She didn’t follow a checklist of 
principles. For her, education and self were seamless. As a result, lessons could 
flow from one subject to another. 

CFR_2006-07_R3.indb   62 11/6/08   11:46:14 AM



ROSENBERG  AN ECLECTIC SCHOOLTEACHER

63

Howard made folklore part of the flow of education. In both “The Bell Always 
Rang” and “On Our Own,” it is clear that she applied lore to lessons. At Frostburg 
students documented their childlife by authoring autoethnographies (Ruffo 1951). 
This was a continuation of an approach to childlore that started in 1930. As she 
explains in her own autoethnography, Dorothy’s World:

One problem that soon became [Howard’s] great concern was the fact 
that most of the children, especially the boys, reached the junior high 
school grades ‘hating’ poetry. Looking for the causes, she learned that 
their elementary classroom experiences with poetry had included: (1) 
homework memory assignments of (2) poems chosen by the teacher 
(a woman) for (3) didactic purposes and (4) memorized as a chore to 
escape punishment.

Then one spring day at noon she stood at an open classroom 
pondering that problem, casually watching the children play on an 
unsupervised playground. Skip ropes were turning, marbles rolling, 
balls bouncing. Gradually she became aware of metaphoric rhythmic 
language accompanying the body movements of children. 

By the time the bell rang calling the children in, she had counted 
on her fingers more than a dozen rhymes and formulae; and when 
the children came to class, rhymes, rhythms, and metaphors of the 
playground were discussed. The next day, self assigned homework 
was brought in and by week’s end the class had a collection of more 
than two hundred playground rhymes (1977, 287-288).

Although Howard had difficulty understanding why students didn’t like poetry, 
she located an infinite resource in her students’ expressive culture. In order to 
learn the lessons of the day, students supplied grist for the mill. From then on she 
relied on student culture to develop and execute her lessons. 

Howard, the Folklorist

Howard learned of folklore around 1933, when she met with Walter Barnes, an 
English professor at New York University. She was introduced to Barnes through 
Howard’s sister, and she spent much time with him learning about this field that 
was new to her. He introduced her to the work of Gomme, Newell, and other 
collectors of children’s lore. Barnes suggested that Howard corral her collection 
into a doctoral dissertation, which she did, titling it “Folk Jingles of American 
Children: A Collection and Study of Rhymes Used by Children Today” (1938). And 
she continued to teach middle school.3

“Folk Jingles of American Children”

Howard’s dissertation “explores children’s rhyming traditions as unconscious 
literature that are an integral part of childlife; that parents recognize the 

CFR_2006-07_R3.indb   63 11/6/08   11:46:14 AM



AN ECLECTIC SCHOOLTEACHER ROSENBERG

64

educational value of children’s folk literature and that writers for children use as 
a model” (“Sixty Dirty Republikins” 1939). “Folk Jingles” was a national study in 
which Howard enlisted the aid of her colleagues in folklore and education, as well 
as children themselves across the United States. It was bold in its present-tense 
orientation, which enabled Howard to bridge the gap between armchair scholar 
and ethnographer (see Grider 1994).

In her studies of folk cultures Howard was aware of the transmission of 
expression. Like her teachers before her, Boas, Benedict, and Mead,4 Howard saw 
children as constituting a folk group with their own system of expressions, mores, 
and beliefs. Their culture stood three foot tall, and through Howard’s studies she 
confirmed that children had a place on the cultural landscape.

She hoped that her schoolchildren would learn the fundamentals of language 
and that her students would grow to be the peacemakers of the world through 
their words. She had high expectations of her boys, her girls, and herself. Their 
training was very demanding, involving all of their senses in experiencing the 
world.

“Folk Jingles” is a breakthrough anthology. Howard combined fieldwork 
with older texts. The older text was her armchair. The fieldwork was that of the 
ethnographer who explored context as well as performance. 

It is unfortunate that “Folk Jingles” is incomplete. Howard did not assign dates 
to the collection she made; therefore we don’t have ethnographic chronology. 
What we do have is an incredibly variegated collection of taunts, jump rope 
rhymes, charms, autograph album rhymes, songs, chants, and plenty more. It is an 
exciting compilation because it explores childlife in the present tense on American 
soil. Most of the collections of childhood rhymes at that time came from overseas, 
with the exception of Newell and Barnes. 

Folklore and Education: Australia 

These intersections of lore, cultural dynamics, and the English language prepared 
Howard for her next step, documenting children’s folklore in Australia. Originally 
she planned to document one group in one environment. But the Fulbright 
group asked that she document the whole of Down Under, and she spent a year 
doing fieldwork (Factor and Darien-Smith 2005), sharing her research in a variety 
of articles in the Journal of American Folklore, Folklore, Southern Folklore, and 
Western Folklore. 

Even while Howard practiced this new craft of folklore, she still maintained her 
stance as a progressive educator. She wrote: “folklore has a justifiable place in the 
schools, not as a separate subject, or for the purpose of making folklorists out of 
children, or as an academic book exercise but as an integral part of a co-ordinated 
[sic] program for child growth and development where children become aware 
of the folklore process, what it is, and how it operates in their own lives and in 
their community, demonstrating . . . four ways to use folklore in the schools: as 
an introduction to poetry; as material for written composition work leading to 
classroom folklore archives; as a beginning step in creative writing, and fourth, as 
vital material for social studies” (1950, 106)

CFR_2006-07_R3.indb   64 11/6/08   11:46:15 AM



ROSENBERG  AN ECLECTIC SCHOOLTEACHER

65

One thing shared between folklore and education here is the concept of 
experience that envelops the classroom and the field. In the educational sense, 
experience as defined by John Dewey (1916) is the interaction of the student and 
the environment (Biesta and Burbules 2003). In folklore, experience is marked 
by the creation of context and performance. In this light the creation of context 
is the creation of environment. The individual is the folk, and both folklore and 
education have attempted to create an environment in which the student, the folk, 
can thrive. 

This is most visible in Howard’s teaching style. For one thing, she needed to 
have her students trust her. Without trust there would be no way students could 
share their lore and be taken seriously. The same thing holds true with respect. 
Howard respected her students, and they in turn respected her. That enabled the 
creation of lessons that were homemade and in line with education’s demands. 

Of course teachers need training, and Howard’s courses at Frostburg were 
designed to do just that. Students’ autoethnographies and visits to museums 
offered lessons in transmission and preservation, as Howard told me in July of 
1989. The transmission of lore was made understandable via folklife examples. 
Howard did not intend to make teachers folklorists. Rather she wanted to have 
them understand transmission as something not limited to learning a lesson. It was 
a way of understanding, knowing life. It was a way of becoming a better person 
and citizen. 

Between 1955 and 1969 Howard published her Australia articles. She wrote 
an introduction to the Dover edition of Gomme’s Traditional Games of England, 
Scotland, and Ireland (1964). She became more involved in the discipline of 
folklore, ever continuing to absorb and apply what she had learned in the 1930s.

Dorothy’s World: An Autoethnography

During the 1960s and 1970s Howard practiced what she preached when it came 
to autoethnographies.5 Dorothy’s World is an exploration of Howard’s youngest 
years in Texas, 1902-1910 (1977). In the autoethnography she describes her 
family life, school, games, friends, and home as a whole. Howard wanted to do 
the autoethnography as a way of expressing herself, albeit in a style somewhat 
romanticized with age. Her book is a lengthy and detailed work that is considered 
a model for folklorists. I do not know if educators use this book as source 
material, but folklorists consider it seminal. 

The book gives a very well rounded view of what childlife looked like in 
earlier times for an earlier age. It deals with oral tradition and with material 
culture. The lessons garnered from the book are powerful and eye-opening. 
Dorothy’s World has been a success, with a wide readership now found on 
Amazon and Barnes and Noble, as well as Powell’s in Portland, Oregon. It is no 
longer published by Prentice-Hall. 

CFR_2006-07_R3.indb   65 11/6/08   11:46:15 AM



AN ECLECTIC SCHOOLTEACHER ROSENBERG

66

Howard as Applied Folklorist

Howard was a pioneering applied folklorist; she utilized childlore for furthering 
other purposes, primarily education. Benjamin Botkin, writing on applied folklore 
in 1953, was of the opinion that the “ultimate aim of applied folklore is the 
restoration to American life of the sense of community — a sense of thinking, 
feeling, and acting along similar though not the same lines” (Botkin 1953, 204) 
He had a sense of folklore as something that could be used in the creation of 
class and social programs: “Thus applied folklore goes beyond cultural history to 
cultural strategy, to the end of creating a favorable environment for the liberation 
of our creative energies and the flourishing of the folk arts among other social 
cooperative activities” (1953, 204). Although he didn’t look at the classroom per 
se, he instead explored a curriculum. Howard, on the other hand, infused lessons 
with lore and lore with lessons. Nothing was set aside, unless, as in “The Bell 
Always Rang,” lessons were shifted to accommodate new learning. 

Howard was an applied folklorist in that she saw the ways folk culture could 
promote social harmony and excite learning. As far as can be told, Howard didn’t 
call herself an applied folklorist or even a folklorist. She was a teacher, an eclectic 
schoolteacher, a “mugwump pedagog” (Dorothy’s World). And she stayed true to 
her pedagogical roots throughout her days.5 

Dorothy Howard’s work also lays bare a distinction between applied and 
public folklore. In acting out the latter, the public folklorist develops programs that 
celebrate and explore a particular theme, people, and folk cultures of communities 
and individuals while creating programs such as festivals, school assemblies, 
concerts, demonstrations, and exhibits to highlight those groups and themes. 

Applied folklore helps people in need. Traditions are used to help others 
in one way or another. It is a kind of public folklore in that it focuses on the 
common good through traditions. But it is the application of traditional practices to 
enhance such activities as lessons that makes it what it is. 

Howard as an applied folklorist utilized what was present in her students’ 
lives to create lessons. The students (except for the Frostburg students) were 
not ethnographers. They got the chance to work with materials with which they 
were familiar. On the one hand, students working with familiar expressions had a 
certain amount of control over their lessons. On the other hand, it was an astute 
instructor who looked to her students for answers about language, writing, and 
overall expression.

End Piece/End Peace 6

Dorothy Howard had keen insights into the unspoken literature of childhood. She 
knew the English language well enough to be able to identify traditional structure 
in children’s unwritten verse. 

Howard was a maverick; there is no doubt about that. She was able to utilize 
student lore in a variety of learning situations (except math and science), and 
she gained the trust of her students so that they could be sure of themselves. As 

CFR_2006-07_R3.indb   66 11/6/08   11:46:15 AM



ROSENBERG  AN ECLECTIC SCHOOLTEACHER

67

a progressive educator, she was able to connect the class with the lore to create 
a meaningful experience. As a folklorist she understood how the transmission 
equation fit into the lives of children. As an applied folklorist, Howard understood 
how traditional culture could be used to support lessons of most all kinds. She 
believed that children’s folklore had a wide variety of uses in the classroom, and 
she practiced what she preached. 

NOTES 

I would like to thank Sylvia Grider, Libby Tucker, Loretta Brockmeier, Diana Kelly-
Byrne and Diane Sidener for their suggestions. All thanks, no blame. 

1. Howard was teaching in a very challenging time for education. While small, 
unconsolidated schools were run essentially by the teacher and the school board, 
the larger schools, including urban schools, were working within a combination of 
outlined curriculum and progressive ideas. Howard taught in both unconsolidated 
and consolidated schools and was completely aware of the Progressive Movement.

2. The progressives’ journal, Progressive Education, included this on the 
frontispiece of each number.

3. The doctorate in education was new at New York University. When Howard 
first tried for the Ph.D., she was told that her subject matter was not worthy of 
exploration. Barnes, as her champion, found a fit for Howard with the university’s 
new Ed.D. program. 

4. Howard doesn’t specifically name what these scholars taught her, but she 
conveys a sense of awe at what they taught. 

6. Dr. Howard called herself an “eclectic school teacher” in her 
authoethnographic writings, most of which are not dated.

7. Along I 30 between Texarkana and Dallas, there are a lot of communities 
that have their basis in northeast Texas agriculture: cotton, soy, vegetables. At the 
outset the community of Lone Oak looks fairly deserted, but it is just very small.

WORKS CITED

Biesta, Gert and Nicholas Burbules. 2003. Pragmatism and Educational Research. 
Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Botkin, Benjamin. 1953. Applied Folklore: Creating Understanding through 
Folklore. Southern Folklore Quarterly 17:199-206.

Cremin, Lawrence. 1961. The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in 
American Education. New York: Vintage.

Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.
Dubois, Rachel Davis. 1984. All This and Something More: Pioneering in 

Intercultural Education. Bryn Mawr: Dorrence.
Factor, June and Kate Darien-Smith, eds. 2005. Child’s Play: Dorothy Howard and 

the Folklore of Australian Children. Melbourne: Museum of Victoria.

CFR_2006-07_R3.indb   67 11/6/08   11:46:15 AM



AN ECLECTIC SCHOOLTEACHER ROSENBERG

68

Graham, Patricia A. 1967. Progressive Education from Arcady to Academe: A 
History of the Progressive Education Association, 1919-1955. New York: 
Teachers College Press. 

Grider, Sylvia Ann. 1994. Dorothy Howard: Pioneer Collector of Children’s 
Folklore. Children’s Folklore Review 17(1): 3-17.

Howard, Dorothy. 1938. Folk Jingles of American Children: A Collection and Study 
of Rhymes Used by Children Today. Ed.D. diss., New York Univ. 

______. 1940. The Bell Always Rang. Elementary English Review 17(7): 262-64.
______. 1941. “Our Own” In the Classroom. Story Parade (October): 5-6.
______. 1950. Folklore in the Schools. New York Folklore Quarterly 6: 99-107.
______. 1958. Australian “Hoppy” (Hopscotch). Western Folklore 17(3): 163-75.
______. 1958. The Game of “Knucklebones” in Australia. Western Folklore. 17(1): 

34-44.
______. 1959. Ball Bouncing Customs and Rhymes in Australia. Midwest Folklore 

9(2): 77-87.
______. 1959. Autograph Album Customs in Australia. Southern Folklore Quarterly 

23(2): 95-107.
______. 1960. Counting-Out Customs of Australian Children. New York Folklore 

Quarterly 16(2): 131-44.
______. 1960. Marble Games of Australian Children. Folklore 71: 165-79.
______. 1961. String Games of Australian Children. Folklore 72: 385-87.
______. 1964. Introduction. In The Traditional Games of England, Scotland, and 

Ireland, vol. 1, by Alice Bertha Gomme. New York: Dover.
______. 1965. Folklore of Australian Children. Keystone Folklore Quarterly 10(3): 

99-115.
______. 1977. Dorothy’s World: Childhood in Sabine Bottom. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 

Prentice Hall. 
______. 1990. Untitled. Manuscript. University of North Texas Archives.
______. n.d. (a) Odyssey of a Country School Teacher. Manuscript. University of 

North Texas Archives.
______. n.d. (b). Pedagog in Embryo. Manuscript. University of North Texas 

Archives.
Katz, Michael B. 1987. Reconstructing American Education. Cambridge, MA: 

Harvard University Press. 
Kilpatrick, William. 1918. The Project Method. Teachers College Record 19: 319-35.
Rosenberg, Jan. 1990. A History Lesson in Folklore and Education: Dorothy 

Howard. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Folklore 
Society, Oakland, CA.

Ruffo, Ronald. 1951. My Play Life. Childhood autoethnography paper for Howard’s 
class.

Sixty Dirty Republikins. Time. 21 Aug. 1939. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/
article/0,9171,762504,00.html (accessed 25 Apr. 2008).

CFR_2006-07_R3.indb   68 11/6/08   11:46:15 AM


	CFR_2007-2008_Part14
	CFR_2007-2008_Part15
	Pages from CFR_2007-2008_Part16



