Radiation-stimulated adsorption processes on the surface of beryllium oxide Chimica Techno Acta ARTICLE published by Ural Federal University 2022, vol. 9(1), № 20229106 eISSN 2411-1414; chimicatechnoacta.ru DOI: 10.15826/chimtech.2022.9.1.06 1 of 5 Radiation-stimulated adsorption processes on the surface of beryllium oxide Turgara T. Tusseyev*, Aktolkyn K. Danlybaeva, Saltanat S. Raimkul, Aizhan A. Kiykabaeva, Ospan M. Doszhanov Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 050040 al-Farabi Ave., 71, Almaty, Kazakhstan * Corresponding author: turgaratus@mail.ru This article belongs to the Regular Issue. © 2021, The Authors. This article is published in open access form under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Abstract The paper presents the study results of photo and gamma radiation effect on the beryllium oxide (BeO) surface properties. Photoadsorp- tion studies of О2 on BeO by the methods of infrared (IR) spectrosco- py and manometry with a change in the temperature of preliminary annealing from 473 to 1073 K show that samples subjected to prelim- inary training at 473 K are most active. The maximum of adsorption activity on -irradiated beryllium oxide is observed on the samples annealed at 673 K before the irradiation. The maximum of paramag- netic centers (PMCs) is also observed on samples annealed at this temperature. Comparison of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and adsorption studies shows that absorption of H2 and O2 leads to the destruction of paramagnetic centers. It is assumed that, upon ir- radiation, adsorption centers with electron and hole modes are formed on the surface of BeO. Keywords adsorption irradiation beryllium oxide surface defects spectra temperature Received: 19.11.2021 Revised: 18.01.2022 Accepted: 27.01.2022 Available online: 28.01.2022 1. Introduction Beryllium oxides (BeO) [1] are widely used molecules in the nuclear and chemical industries [2, 3]. Recently, it was found that BeO functions as a catalyst with a developed surface, and its properties (catalytic) are influenced by external factors (e.g., temperature, radiation, etc.) [4]. It is now acceptable that nuclear radiation causes fun- damental changes in the physical and chemical properties of materials. The above is largely true for the surface properties of oxide materials [5–11]. The changes in the adsorption properties of a solid body often occur due to radiation defects; thus, the inter- actions between adsorbates and adsorbents may be stud- ied to determine the nature of these defects. By studying adsorption kinetics, the rate of radiation accumulation on the surface of irradiated materials can be traced to deter- mine energy characteristics, e.g., depth of radiation level in the area and interaction energy with the adsorbate mol- ecule. Thus, we can determine the mechanism for trans- ferring energy from the irradiated solid to the adsorbed molecule, and so on [12, 13]. Using physical and chemical research methods (electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), infrared (IR), and mass spectrometry), it is possible to investigate the nature of surface radiation defects, their adsorption activities, lifetime, and annealing activation energies. Adsorbates with pronounced acceptor (e.g.oxygen) and donor (e.g.hydrogen) properties may act as a "probe" as there will be an electron transfer between donor and acceptor. Thus, the effects of radiation on solids with a developed surface and the impact of adsorption processes on irradiated materials are new research fields in electronic and structural factors. The present research makes it possible to understand the role of free and localized charge carriers in elementary acts of catalysis and chemisorption and the ability of ad- sorbed molecules to serve as traps for electrons and holes, as compared with other trappings of structural defects or impu- rity atoms located on the surface [14–17]. With sufficient information on these factors, it is possible to generate effec- tive systems with predicted physical and technological prop- erties [18]. Therefore, the aim of this work is to study the impact of irradiation on beryllium oxide properties. 2. Experimental methods 2.1. Preparation of BeO surface In this research, beryllium oxide, the grade “for lumino- phores”, was used to conduct the experiments the irradia- tion impact. This material had a form of white powder http://chimicatechnoacta.ru/ https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2022.9.1.06 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Chimica Techno Acta 2022, vol. 9(1), № 20229106 ARTICLE 2 of 5 with a surface area of 60 m2/g and had impurities of other elements (Al, Fe, Mn, Ca, Si) from 10–2 to 10–4 weight %. It is well-known that BeO is very hygroscopic [19], the weight loss during calcination at 900 °C may be up to 20% of the initial weight; thus, we tried not to overheat beryllium oxide samples. 2.2. Characterization The surface properties were characterized using manome- teric, infrared spectroscopic and radio spectroscopic methods. The apparatus, on which vacuum-temperature training of samples was carried out and gamma adsorp- tion was studied, has two parallel pumping branches con- sisting of zeolite-coal adsorption pumps, diffusion pump type, and cooled traps with a heated oil-free high-vacuum valve. Preliminary studies had shown that there was no noticeable difference in the measurement results between the two pumping methods. Therefore, due to the ad- vantage of the first pumping method consisting in the freedom from contamination by foreline pump oil vapors, we preferred to use it in the experiments. Pressure measurements in the adsorbent-gas system in the gamma adsorption experiments were performed using a manometer pre-gauged for the gas used as adsorbate. The temperature in the system was measured using chro- mel-alumel, chromel-copper, and platinum-platinum- rhodium thermocouples. The investigated gases were mainly hydrogen and oxy- gen. Oxygen was obtained by decomposition of potassium permanganate at temperatures above 230 °C and further purified by passing it through a trap cooled with liquid nitrogen. Before obtaining the gas, the initial product was held for several hours at a temperature slightly lower than the starting reaction temperature. The electrolysis of dis- tilled water produced hydrogen, which was purified fur- ther by diffusion through heated palladium capillary walls and then passed through a trap cooled with liquid nitro- gen. The resulting gas was stored in the gas production system for 3–4 h before being pumped out and produced again to avoid contamination. Although the gases were thoroughly purified, there were still impurities in their composition. Mass spectrometric analysis showed that oxygen contains carbon dioxide and hydrogen has water vapor. The gamma unit with a dose rate in the central channel of 200 rad/s was used as a source of -quanta, with the radiation source being the preparation of the radioactive isotope 60Co. The dose was determined using a ferrous sulfate dosimeter. The radiation dose was calculated ac- cording to the formula: 𝐷 = 𝑘𝛾𝑀 𝑡 𝑅 2⁄ , (1) where R is the distance in meter; t is time in h; M is iso- tope activity in millicuries; kγ is the gamma constant, indi- cating the dose rate of a point source. The following for- mula was used to calculate the amount of gamma- adsorbed gas: N= 3.3∙1016 ΔpV, (2) where N is the amount of adsorbed gas in mol/g; Δp is the pressure drop in mmHg; V is the volume in mm3. Pressure measurements and recordings during the adsorbent- adsorbent coexposure were remotely made while irradiat- ing samples in the central channel of the gamma unit. The error in the pressure measurement was ~5%. The method of infrared (IR) spectroscopy is one of the most effective methods for the investigation of solid sur- faces. This method is widely used as a solution of research and many other problems in Physics, Chemistry and other sciences [20–22]. An infrared spectrometer (KarlZeiss Je- na type UR-20) was used with an operating frequency range of 5000400 cm–1. To reduce IR scattering, berylli- um oxide powder particles were repeatedly sieved and pressed into thin pellets at a pressure of 812 kg/mm. Di- mensions of the tablets pressed in a special collapsible mould were 30 x 10 mm2 or 35 x 15 mm2, depending on irradiation and examination of the samples. The beryllium oxide tablets were 0.2 mm thick. In case of significant light scattering in the short wavelength range, an aperture was placed in the comparison beam. Radiation defects in beryllium oxide irradiated by gam- ma-rays depending on irradiation dose rate and pretreat- ment temperature were investigated using an electron par- amagnetic resonance (EPR) method widely used to study free radicals in various paramagnetic centers formed in the material during the action of ionizing radiation [23, 24]. Before irradiation, beryllium oxide was subjected to several hours of thermal-vacuum treatment. For one series of ex- periments, the samples were soldered at a pressure ~10–6 mmHg, and in experiments on co-irradiation of samples with gas, the pressure in ampoules was 10–2 mmHg. After that, the samples were irradiated either in dewars with liquid nitrogen or at room temperature. The adsorption and EPR spectra were studied in the same ampoules made of molybdenum glass, giving an in- tense EPR signal when irradiated. Before the measure- ments, the ampoules were annealed in a soft flame of a gas burner, and the sample was transferred to the other end of the ampoule and kept either in liquid nitrogen or at room temperature. Before irradiation, the BeO samples were transferred back into the annealed end of the am- poule. The annealing operation is superfluous when work- ing with Luch glass ampoules, as it is practically not acti- vated under radiation. In this work, radio spectrometers of centimeter (λ = 3.2 cm) and decimeter ranges (λ = 30 cm) were used to capture EPR spectra. The sensi- tivity of the spectrometer is ~1013 unpaired spins in the sample by diphenylpicrylhydrosyl (DPPH). The resolution of the device was 0.2 Oe. The width of the EPR position spectrum lines and the value of the splitting between the components of the superfine structure were calculated Chimica Techno Acta 2022, vol. 9(1), № 20229106 ARTICLE 3 of 5 from the chart tape of the recorder. The EPR spectra were recorded at room temperature or liquid nitrogen temperature at constant microwave power and instrument sensitivity. DPPH and Mn+2 samples in magnesium oxide, whose posi- tions relative to the sample are strictly fixed, and CuCl2∙5H2O containing a known amount of paramagnetic particles were used as reference sources in these studies. The g-factors of irradiated BeO were calculated by the standard method. The reference sources were located either in the dewar or directly in the resonator of the spectrometer. Before irradiation, samples were annealed for 68 h in air; the same amounts were annealed in a vacuum at 400 °C. Irradiation with 60Co γ-rays was carried out at dose rate J = 14.4 R/s. Experiments on radiation adsorp- tion kinetics were done at an initial pressure of oxygen and hydrogen of Ro = 8.510–15.10–2 torr. IR spectroscopic studies were carried out in the absorption spectrum range of υ = 30004000 cm–1. EPR studies were performed in both centimeter and decimeter ranges at both room tem- perature and liquid nitrogen temperature. 3. Results and discussion Above we described the experiments carried out in this research. Detailed studies of the radiation adsorption reg- ularities of hydrogen and oxygen were presented on BeO samples trained at 473–1023 K in a radiation field. Fig. 1 demonstrates IR absorption spectra of irradiated BeO ob- tained during the experiments. The inlet of O2 and exposure to BeO at 673–773 K de- creased the intensity of absorption bands of isolated OH-groups of type 1 (3750 cm–1), resulting in the appear- ance of weak peaks of 3680–3720 cm–1 and constant growth of the band of isolated OH-groups (3630 cm–1). Fig. 1 IR absorption spectra of -irradiated BeO: 1 – initial spec- trum before irradiation; 2 – spectrum after irradiation, D = 0.024 MGy; 3 – puffing of H2; 4 – in 2.5 h after puffing; 5 – in 5 h after puffing with Tpr = 873 K It was assumed that the decrease in the intensity of the 3750 cm–1 band and the appearance of peaks at 3680–3720 cm–1 are due to the participation of type 1 OH-groups, which play the role of protons in the hydrogen bonding in the oxygen adsorption. In the IR spectrum, along with a decrease in the intensity of hydroxyl groups (primarily the 3740 cm–1 band), bands at 3580 and 3680 cm–1 appear, corresponding to adsorbed water and hydrogen-bonded OH groups (Fig. 1). As can be seen from Fig. 2, due to preliminary annealing of samples at 1073 K, oxygen puffing did not cause any changes in the infrared spectrum of BeO, suggesting sintered surfaces. Fig. 2 represents dose dependence of radiation adsorp- tion of gases on beryllium oxide. This figure shows that the amount of adsorbed gas changed symbatically with the initial pressure and radiation dose while the initial adsorption rate of hydrogen was greater than oxygen. However, at the same initial pressure, for hydrogen adsorption, lower doses were required for saturation compared with oxygen. Fig. 2 Dose dependence of radiation adsorption of gases on beryllium oxide: 1 – hydrogen adsorption, 2 – oxygen adsorption (P = 113 Pa) Fig. 3 presents a graphical representation of the kinet- ics of radiation adsorption of O2 on the BeO surface. Fig. 3 Kinetics of radiation adsorption of O2 by BeO: 1 – Ро=110 –1, 2 – 1.210–1, 3 – 0.510–1, 4 – 8.510–1 mmHg Chimica Techno Acta 2022, vol. 9(1), № 20229106 ARTICLE 4 of 5 The result shows that radiation adsorption of oxygen de- pends on the initial oxygen pressure, i.e., the surface coverage. However, the maximum adsorption activity was observed on samples heated before exposure at 673 K on -irradiated BeO, as shown in Fig. 4 demonstrating temperature dependence of gamma-adsorption of O2 on beryllium oxide. Fig. 4 Distribution in temperature dependence of -adsorption of O2 on BeO (Ро = 910 –2 mmHg) D: 1 – 0.4; 2 – 1.2; 3 – 2.4; 4 – 4.8; 5 – 18.6 mrad The maximum number of paramagnetic centers was al- so observed at a temperature around 400 C, i.e., 673 K, as shown in Fig. 5 demonstrating dose dependence of para- magnetic centers on BeO samples that were calcined be- fore irradiation at different temperatures (Tc). Fig. 5 Dose dependence of paramagnetic centers on BeO: 1 – Tpr = 200 °С; 2, 4 – 400 °С; 3 – 600 °С; 4 – leak-in of O2 (λ = 30 cm) Besides, the adsorption of hydrogen caused a decrease in PMC numbers (Fig. 6), indicating adsorption of hydro- gen on hole centers and the resulting destruction of such centers. Moreover, during the oxygen adsorption, an in- crease in the EPR signal is observed, possibly due to the adsorption of oxygen in the paramagnetic form O2. Thermal desorption of adsorbed H2 and O2 occurred at temperatures >423 K. Besides, oxygen had two peaks of excitation within 453–533 K and 573–673 K, corresponding to characteristic ranges of hydrogen-bonded and coordina- tion-bonded molecular release, respectively. Fig. 7 shows dose dependence of PMC in BeO (1) containing adsorbed O2 (2) and adsorbed H2 (3). Fig. 6 EPR spectra of gamma-irradiated BeO (a) with absorbed O2 (b), with adsorbed H2 (D = 60 mrad) (c). The irradiation and measurement temperature are ambient Fig. 7 Dose dependence of PMC on BeO (1) containing adsorbed O2 (2) and adsorbed H2 (3) Fig. 8 presents the annealing of paramagnetic centers on -irradiated BeO (dose of radiation, D = 18.6 mrad). The annealing of adsorption and paramagnetic centers ended at different temperatures as the adsorption centers were annealed completely at 673 K, while the PMCs are retained at high temperatures, as described in Fig. 8. It is possible that paramagnetic centers, in contrast to adsorp- tion centers, are also formed in the amount of the sample and, therefore, have higher temperature resistance. A comparison of infrared spectroscopy, EPR, and mano- metric data indicated that the -adsorption centers for oxy- gen and hydrogen are paramagnetic centers with electron and hole regimes. Thus, secondary processes involving sur- face hydroxyl groups and adsorbed molecules are possible. Further, the possibility of oxidation of organics in the pres- ence of organic matter can not be excluded in this research. Fig. 8 Annealing of paramagnetic centers on gamma-irradiated BeO. (Dn = 18.6 mrad). a – T = 20, b – 60, c – 120, d – 170, e – 240, f – 360, g – 460, 3 – 480 °C 0 200 400 600 800 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 T, o C x10 17 N, mol / g 1 2 3 5 4 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 10 20 30 Y, otn.yed. D, Mrad 1 2 3 Chimica Techno Acta 2022, vol. 9(1), № 20229106 ARTICLE 5 of 5 4. Conclusions In summary, a comparison of electron paramagnetic reso- nance and adsorption studies indicates that absorption of H2 and O2 leads to the destruction of paramagnetic centers, which provides the evidence of formation of adsorption cen- ters with electron and hole regimes on the BeO surface. At the same time, the discrepancy between the absorption dose ranges (up to 0.3 mGy for adsorption and 0.6 mGy and more for EPR centers) and the annealing temperature (573–673 K and below are adsorption centers, 723 K and above are par- amagnetic centers) indicates that these types of centers are not identical. It can be assumed that both surface and bulk paramagnetic centers are formed upon irradiation. The pre- sent study will be useful for future research involving ab- sorption kinetics at other metal-oxide surfaces. Declaration of competing interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. References 1. Kiyko VS, Vaispapir VY. Production features of preparation and properties of ceramic objects made from a mixture of lightlyand highly-fired BeO powder. Refract Ind Ceram. 2016;57(4):423–426. doi:10.1007/s11148-016-9997-3 2. Gaft M, Nagli L, Gorychev A, et.al. Atomic and molecular emission of beryllium by LIBS. Spectrochim Acta Part B: Atomic Spectrosc. 2021;182:106233. doi:10.1016/j.sab.2021.106233 3. Wroblewska M, Blanchet D, Lyoussi A, et.al. A review and analysis of the state of the art on beryllium poisoning in re- search reactors. Ann Nucl Energy. 2021;163:108540. doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108540 4. Zaripov RR, Nazarov AA, Ponikarov SI. Catalysts applied in the catalytic dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons. Bull Kazan Technol Univ. 2013;16:67–75. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/katalizatory- primenyaemye-pri-kataliticheskom-degidrirovanii- parafinovyh-olefinovyh-i-alkilaromaticheskih-uglevodorodov 5. Dey S, Drazin J, Wang Y, et.al. Radiation tolerance of nano- crystalline ceramics: insights from yttria stabilized zirconia. Sci Rep. 2013;7746. doi:10.1038/srep07746 6. Du JH, Peng L. Recent progress in investigations of surface structure and properties of solid oxide materials with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Chin Chem Lett. 2018;29(6):747–751. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2018.02.012 7. Was GS. Fundamentals of radiation materials science. USA, New York: Springer. 2017. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3438-6 8. Petrik NG, Alexandrov AB, Orlando TM, Vall AI. Radiation- induced processes at oxide surfaces and interfaces relevant to spent nuclear fuel storage. Am Nucl Soc Winter Meet, Long Beach, CA, United States. 1999. 9. Zinkle SJ, Was GS. Materials challenges in nuclear energy. Acta Materialia. 2013;61(3):735–758. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004 10. Rollett D, Wang Y, Carpenter JS. Design of radiation tolerant materials via interface engineering. Adv. Mater. 2013;25:6975–6979. 11. Polushin NI, Laptev AI, Spitsyn BV. Deposition of boron- doped thin CVD diamond films from methane-triethyl borate- hydrogen gas mixture. Process. 2020;8(6):666. doi:10.3390/PR8060666 12. Tuseyev T, Polyakov A, Bitenbaev M. About kinetics of detect accumulation in irradiated oxides of metals. Eurasia Conf Nuclear Sci Appl, Izmir Turkey. 2000. 13. Tuseev T. Study of the surface properties of irradiated oxide materials. 6th Int Conf "Nuclear and Radiation Physics", Al- maty, Republic of Kazakhstan. 2016. 14. Tuseyev T. Radiation effects on oxide material surface. 5th Conf “Nuclear Science and Its Application”, Ankara, Turkey. 2008. 15. Altunal V, Guckan V, Ozdemir A, et.al. A calcination study on BeO ceramics for radiation dosimetry. Mater Res Bull. 2020;130. doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2020.110921 16. Ryskulov AE, Kozlovskiy AL, Ivanov IA, et.al. The effect of Ni12+ heavy ion irradiation on the optical and structural properties of BeO ceramics. Ceram Int. 2020;46(4):4065– 4070. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.121 17. Khromushin IV, Aksenova TI, Tuseev T, et.al. Particularities of radiation defect formation in ceramic barium cerate. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2015;81(1):012037. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/81/1/012037 18. Védrine JC. Heterogeneous catalysis on metal oxides. Catal. 2017;7:341. doi:10.3390/catal7110341 19. Mishra SK, Ahlawat A, Khosla D, et.al. Experimental investi- gation of variations in morphology, composition and mixing- state of boundary layer aerosol: A balloon based study over urban environment (New Delhi). Atmos Environ. 2018;185:243–252. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.053 20. Martynova TV, Kirichenko AN, Shitareva MS. Fourier- transform infrared spectroscopy for analysis of diamond ma- terials of different origin. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2021;1047(1):012187. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1047/1/012187 21. Altunal V, Guckan V, Ozdemir A, et.al. A systematic study on luminescence characterization of lanthanide-doped BeO ce- ramic dosimeters. J Alloys Compd. 2021;876:160105. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160105 22. Maslov AL, Laptev AI, Polushin NI. Express-analysis of nitro- gen content in CVD-diamonds by FTIR-spectrometry. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2020;919(2):022049. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/919/2/022049 23. Milisch B, Kerbe F, Michalowsky L. Defect centres in berylli- um oxide ceramics studied by electron paramagnetic reso- nance (EPR). Ceram Int. 2016;16(5):311–318. doi:10.1016/0272-8842(90)90045-H 24. Fang W, Yang DX, Chen HJ, et.al. Investigations of the elec- tron paramagnetic resonance parameters and defect struc- tures for Cu2+ ions in BeO crystal with trigonally distorted tetrahedral symmetry. Mater. 2019;475:234–239. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.081 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11148-016-9997-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2021.106233 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108540 https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/katalizatory-primenyaemye-pri-kataliticheskom-degidrirovanii-parafinovyh-olefinovyh-i-alkilaromaticheskih-uglevodorodov https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/katalizatory-primenyaemye-pri-kataliticheskom-degidrirovanii-parafinovyh-olefinovyh-i-alkilaromaticheskih-uglevodorodov https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/katalizatory-primenyaemye-pri-kataliticheskom-degidrirovanii-parafinovyh-olefinovyh-i-alkilaromaticheskih-uglevodorodov https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07746 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2018.02.012 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3438-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004 https://doi.org/10.3390/PR8060666 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2020.110921 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.121 https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/81/1/012037 https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7110341 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.053 https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1047/1/012187 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160105 https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/919/2/022049 https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-8842(90)90045-H https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.081