Factors for increasing strength of composite materials based on fine high-calcium fly ash published by Ural Federal University eISSN 2411-1414; chimicatechnoacta.ru ARTICLE 2022, vol. 9(4), No. 20229407 DOI: 10.15826/chimtech.2022.9.4.07 1 of 7 Factors for increasing strength of composite materials based on fine high-calcium fly ash Olga M. Sharonova a* , Leonid A. Solovyov a , Alexander G. Anshits ab a: Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology SB RAS, Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS", Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia b: Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia * Corresponding author: shar@icct.ru This paper belongs to a Regular Issue. © 2022, the Authors. This article is published in open access under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Abstract Industrial high-calcium fly ashes obtained by burning Kansk-Achinsk coal at a thermal power plant and selected from different fields of electrostatic precipitators of an ash collecting plant were studied as the basis for composite binders (CB). The main factors influencing the properties of such CBs are the particle size, the concentration of su- perplasticizer at a water:binder (w/b) ratio of 0.25, and the propor- tion of HCFA in the mixture with cement. In particular, for cementless CBs at w/b 0.4, it was found that a change in the particle size d90 from 30 μm to 10 μm leads to an increase in compressive strength by more than 2 times – from 5.5–14 MPa to 11–36 MPa, accordingly, with a curing age of 3–300 days. The 0.12% additive of Melflux 5581F su- perplasticizer at w/b 0.25 increases the compressive strength – up to 14–32 MPa and up to 24–78 MPa, accordingly. The HCFA-cement blends were investigated in the range of 60–90% HCFA and the max- imum compressive strength 77 MPa at 28 days of hardening was found at 80% HCFA. On the basis of 80% HCFA blend with the 0.3% addi- tion of Melflux 5581F and 5% silica fume, the specimens of ultra-high strength (108 MPa at 28 days of hardening) were obtained. Keywords binder high-calcium fly ash superplasticizer compressive strength phase composition Received: 26.05.22 Revised: 08.07.22 Accepted: 12.07.22 Available online: 19.07.22 1. Introduction Fly ash from coal burning is considered as a technogenic resource of mineral raw materials in various technologies of their processing into valuable products [1–3]. For ex- ample, because of the environmental and economic bene- fits, fly ashes (FAs) are used as supplementary cementi- tious materials (SCMs) in the production of modern con- struction composite materials [4–6]. The effect of fly ash- es on the properties of composite materials can vary strongly depending on the fly ash composition. In the compositions with cement, all FAs exhibit a pozzolanic activity in the reaction between Ca(OH)2, which is formed during hydration of the silicate phases of cement, and aluminosilicate glass (a component of the FA) to yield cal- cium silicate hydrates (C–S–H), calcium aluminosilicate hydrates (C–A–S–H), and calcium aluminate hydrates (C–A–H) [7]. Fly ashes with high calcium content (20–40%) contain calcium-bearing phases that inde- pendently exhibit binding properties: lime CaO, anhydrite CaSO4, calcium aluminate Ca3Al2O6, calcium aluminoferrite Ca4Al2Fe2O10, and dicalcium silicate β-Ca2SiO4 [8–10]. These ashes were also found to contain such crystalline phases as calcite CaCO3, quartz α-SiO2, periclase MgO, hematite α-Fe2O3, ferrospinel, and various calcium alumino- silicates [11–13]. The phase composition of HCFAs varies greatly for different sources and primarily in terms of glass content: from 23 to 82% [8, 11, 12]. Moreover, the phase composition varies greatly for fly ashes sampled from different fields of electrostatic precip- itators (EP). According to the data [14], the content of the glass phase increases by 2.2 times in the series of high-calcium fly ashes from the 1st to the 4th field of the EP, but the con- tent of free CaO decreases by a factor of 5.6. Even more radical differences are observed in the particle size, for example, the maximum size distribution shifts from ~25 to ~3 m for HCFA of 1st and 4th fields, respectively [8]. When the content of fine cementitious components in- creases in the binder, it becomes more important to use water-reducing admixtures. Already the third generation of water-reducing admixtures is used to reduce water demand http://chimicatechnoacta.ru/ https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2022.9.4.07 mailto:shar@icct.ru http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5613-3203 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-3252 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-0319 https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2022.9.4.07&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2022-7-19 Chimica Techno Acta 2022, vol. 9(4), No. 20229407 ARTICLE 2 of 7 − polycarboxylate ether superplasticizers (PCE). These agents allow controlling the water-to-cement ratio and properties of fresh concrete mortar, as well as affect the hardening rate and strength of the product with high effi- ciency. The mechanism of action of PCE is based on the fact that carboxyl groups (–COOH) in the polymer back- bone ensure adsorption on the surface of cement grains, while side polyester chains cause steric hindrance, thus preventing the coalescence of fine particles [15]. Different components of the mineralogical composition of cement are known to vary in terms of their adsorption character- istics with respect to superplasticizers. Namely, calcium silicates Ca3SiO5 and Ca2SiO4 have a negative -potential (–5 mV), while calcium aluminate Ca3Al2O6 and calcium aluminoferrite Ca4Al2Fe2O10 are characterized by a positive -potential (~+10 and +5 mV, respectively) [16]. Once the superplasticizer is adsorbed, the surface of Ca3Al2O6 and Ca4Al2Fe2O10 becomes negatively charged, thus contrib- uting to mutual repulsion of cement particles and causing high dispersibility of cement. There are few data on the behavior of dispersed mineral components with respect to superplasticizers in the available literature. So, for exam- ple, the study focused on cements with admixtures of alu- minosilicate FA, ground limestone powder, and blast- furnace slag with -potentials of +13 mV, +2.5 mV, and –2.7 mV, respectively, showed that the greatest amount of polycarboxylate ether superplasticizer was adsorbed in the case of limestone powder, while this amount was the low- est in the case of slag [17]. Therefore, in order to achieve identical rheological parameters, the highest superplasti- cizer concentration was used in the case of limestone powder, and the lowest superplasticizer concentration, in the case of slag admixture. Although the scope of practical application of coal ash- es is currently expanding, there is still no clear under- standing of the regularities of the influence of the compo- sition, the particle size, as well as the type and concentra- tion of a superplasticizer, on the structure and properties of cementitious materials based on fly ash, in particular, on high-calcium fly ash. This study aimed to investigate the influence of the particle size, the composition of HCFA and HCFA–PC blends, as well as the content of a super- plasticizer admixture on the strength properties of ce- ment-free and highly filled (60–90% HCFA) composite cements materials. 2. Experimental 2.1. Objects High-calcium fly ashes produced during pulverized com- bustion of grade B2 low-ash (11%) brown coal mined from the Kansk–Achinsk coal basin were used as the starting material for the composite specimens. The coal was burned at a temperature of 1400–1500 °C in the furnaces of the BKZ-420 boiler with liquid slag removal at the Krasnoyarsk Thermal Power Plant 2. The fly ashes were sampled from fields 3 and 4 of electrostatic precipitators (fractions 3 and 4, respectively) on a setup characterized by a particle capture efficiency of ≥98%. Portland cement PC 42.5 N manufactured at Krasnoyarsk Cement Plant was also used in this study. Melflux 5581F polycarboxylate ether superplasticizer (BASF Construction Solutions, Trostberg, Germany) and silica fume MKU-95 (Stromex OJSC, Moscow, Russia) were used as admixtures. 2.2. Methods Particle size distribution was measured on an Analysette 22 MicroTec laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Fritsch, Germany) using a dry cell. The macrocomponent composition (SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, SO3, Na2O, K2O, and TiO2) and loss on ignition (LOI) were determined by chemical analysis in compliance with a State standard GOST 5382-91. Quantitative XRD analysis was performed using the full- profile Rietveld method [18]. The XRD patterns were rec- orded in reflection geometry using Co Kα radiation on a PANalytical X'Pert PRO diffractometer equipped with a PIXcel detector and a graphite monochromator. The XRD pattern were recorded in the range of diffraction angles 2θ=7–100°. The mass percentages of the crystalline and amorphous components were determined by the external standard method (using corundum). The absorption coeffi- cients of the samples were calculated from the total ele- mental composition according to the chemical analysis data. This method has been successfully used for quantification of the phase composition of HCFA [8, 10]. The specific surface area (SSA) was determined using a NOVA 3200e sorption analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments, USA) in the low- temperature nitrogen adsorption/desorption mode at – 195.8 °C (77.35 K) in the range of relative pressures P/P0=0.01–0.995. The 20×20×20 mm hardened cube-shaped composite specimens were produced from 100% HCFA (fraction 3 or 4) at a water–binder ratio w/b = 0.4 without the super- plasticizer (specimens FA-3 and FA-4, respectively) or at a water–binder ratio w/b = 0.25 with an admixture of 0.12 wt.% Melflux 5581F superplasticizer (specimens 100fa-3 and 100fa-4, respectively). Superplasticizer con- centration was chosen according to the results of the flowability test [10]. The reference specimens were pro- duced from cement PC 42.5 N at a w/b ratio = 0.4 without a superplasticizer (specimen PC_04) and w/b = 0.25 with the admixture of 0.12 wt.% Melflux 5581F superplasticizer (specimen PC_025). All the specimens were stored in a moist atmosphere for 1–300 days. The specimens of the composite materials with composition HCFA–PC were pre- pared (where HCFA is fraction 4, its content in the blend being 60, 70, 80 and 90%) at w/b = 0.25 and concentra- tion of the Melflux 5581F superplasticizer being 0.12% (specimens 60fa, 70fa, 80fa, and 90fa, respectively). The composition containing 80% HCFA was used to produce the specimen 80fa-SF at w/b ratio = 0.25 with an admix- Chimica Techno Acta 2022, vol. 9(4), No. 20229407 ARTICLE 3 of 7 ture of 0.3% Melflux 5581F superplasticizer and 5% of silica fume to the blend. The strength tests of the speci- mens were conducted on a 3360 Series dual column tab- letop universal testing system (Instron, USA) at a frame speed of 5 mm/min. Compressive strength was measured for four cubes for each curing age, and calculated as the average of three nearest strength values. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Characteristics of initial fractions of HCFA and Portland cement The particle size distribution data (Table 1) show that HCFA fraction 4 has a much smaller particle size com- pared to that of fraction 3. In particular, d90 is ~10 and 30 µm, while d50 is 4 and 9 µm for fractions 4 and 3, re- spectively. Meanwhile, both these fractions are much smaller than PC particles. For PC 42.5 N, the particle size distribution is shifted towards coarser particles: d90 and d50 are 55 and 20 m, respectively. The total specific sur- face area (SSA) of powder materials is primarily deter- mined by the particle size, but it is also influenced by oth- er factors such as particle density and porosity. The studied HCFA fractions consist of microspheres of different sizes and morphologies [14]. The microspheres are formed from authigenic minerals (being responsible for their composition) contained in coal in the porous structure of the carbon matrix regulating their size [19]. The analyzed fractions 3 and 4 sampled from fields 3 and 4 of the electrostatic precipitators of the ash collec- tion facility have similar chemical compositions, as can be seen from the content of the five main components of the composition (Figure 1). The predominant component is CaO (40 and 39.69 wt.%); the content of SiO2 is apprecia- bly high (24.26 and 24.60 wt.%), while the content of oth- er macrocomponents is significantly lower (Al2O3, 6.71 wt.% and 7.30 wt.%; Fe2O3, 13.45 wt.% and 14.29 wt.%; MgO, 9.10 wt.% and 8.24 wt.%, respectively). Unlike Portland cement PC 42.5 N, these fractions are characterized by a lower (1.6-fold) content of CaO, but higher contents of the SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, MgO components. Both fractions are characterized by a significantly higher content of total CaO compared to most Class C fly ashes from pulverized coal combustion [1, 20–22], which causes a higher contribution of Ca-containing phases. Fractions 3 and 4 contain the same phases, but there are some differences in their contents. The amorphous phase (32.6 and 42.1 wt.%) is the predominant component of both fractions 3 and 4 [14]. Table 1 Dispersity characteristics of HCFA fractions 3 and 4 and Portland cement PC 42.5 N. Sample d90, m d50, m SSA, g/cm 3 Fraction 3 30 9 1.52 Fraction 4 10 4 2.36 PC 42.5 N 55 20 0.30 Fraction 4 is characterized by lower contents of the Ca3Al2O6 and CaO phases, while the contents of Ca2FexAlyO5, CaCO3, Ca(OH)2 and the amorphous phase are increased. In comparison with the fly ash fractions, PC 42.5 N cement has a qualitatively different phase composition [14]. It contains tricalcium silicate Ca3SiO4 as the predom- inant component (64.5 wt.%), and clinker phases typical of cement are also present: dicalcium silicate Ca2SiO4, aluminoferrite Ca2FexAlyO5, aluminate Ca3Al2O6, as well as calcium sulfate hydrates CaSO40.5H2O and CaSO42H2O, which are commonly added during grinding. 3.2. The effect of particle size of HCFA fractions on strength of composite materials without and with superplasticizer admixture A detailed description of the prepared composite speci- mens is given in Table 2. Measuring compressive strength (comp) of the speci- mens based on 100% HCFA of each fraction 3 and 4 at a water–binder ratio w/b = 0.4 without a superplasticizer (Figure 2, specimens FA-3 and FA-4) demonstrated that comp is 2- to 2.6-fold higher for FA-4 compared to FA-3 and is equal to 11–36 MPa and 5.5–14 MPa, respectively, at the curing age of 3–300 days. Figure 1 The content of the main components in the chemical composition of fractions 3 and 4. Table 2 Mixture proportion (wt. %) of composite materials (SF – silica fume; W/B – water/binder ratio; SP – superplasticizer). Specimen HCFA PC SF W/B SP Fr. 3 Fr. 4 FA-3 100 – – – 0.4 – FA-4 – 100 – – 0.4 – PC_04 – – 100 – 0.4 – PC_025 – – 100 – 0.25 0.12 100fa-3 100 – – – 0.25 0.12 100fa-4 – 100 – – 0.25 0.12 60fa – 60 40 – 0.25 0.12 70fa – 70 30 – 0.25 0.12 80fa – 80 20 – 0.25 0.12 90fa – 90 10 – 0.25 0.12 80fa-SF – 80 20 5 0.25 0.3 Chimica Techno Acta 2022, vol. 9(4), No. 20229407 ARTICLE 4 of 7 While the fractions’ compositions differ only slightly, the higher fineness of fraction 4 is the key factor being responsible for the higher strength of the FA-4 specimens compared to those of the FA-3 specimens. The most active phases of these HCFA are Ca2FexAlyO5, CaSO4, CaO and glass [10] more actively involved in the hydration process with an increase in the dispersion of the ash material, forming more hydrate products that increase strength. The effect of fraction fineness on the strength of com- posite materials is quite expected when using the Melflux 5581 F superplasticizer, which provides better dispersibil- ity of micron and submicron particles in the liquid phase. Melflux 5581F is a polycarboxylate ether superplasticizer consisting of the poly(methacrylic acid) backbone and methoxypolyethylene glycol side chains [23]. The mecha- nism of dispersion ensured by Melflux 5581F superplasti- cizer is considered to be related to electrostatic repulsive forces generated by carboxyl groups (–COO–) of the back- bone on the surface of cement grains and to the steric ef- fect of repulsion induced by the hydrophobic side chains of methoxypolyethylene glycol [24]. The effect of superplas- ticizer admixture was studied for the specimens based on 100% HCFA of each fraction (3 and 4) at Melflux 5581F concentration of 0.12% and w/b ratio = 0.25 (Figure 3, specimens 100fa-3 and 100fa-4, respectively). Figure 2 Compressive strength of specimens FA-3 and FA-4 and Portland cement PC_04 at a w/b ratio = 0.4 without superplasti- cizer added. Figure 3 Compressive strength of specimens 100fa-3 and 100fa-4 at a w/b ratio = 0.25 with an admixture of 0.12% Melflux 5581F and PC_04 at a w/b ratio = 0.4 in the absence of superplasticizer. The findings indicate that strength of 100fa-4 speci- mens increased more than two-fold: up to 24–78 MPa af- ter the curing age of 3–300 days. A similar effect was also observed for 100fa-3 specimens, whose strength increased to 14–32 MPa after the same curing age. The comp value of 100fa-4 specimens was similar to that of the reference specimens based on Portland cement PC 42.5 N at w/b ratio = 0.4 without the superplasticizer (PC_04) during the early curing age, while being higher than that of the reference specimen by ~10 MPa during the late curing age (Figure 3). More detailed studies were conducted for the specimens based on fraction 4. 3.3. The effect of cement admixtures on strength of composite materials The effect of cement admixtures on activity of the fly ash fraction 4 was studied for the specimens of composite ma- terials based on mixture HCFA–PC (Table 2), where the PC content is 10, 20, 30, and 40% and the HCFA is fraction 4 with its content in the blend of 90, 80, 70, and 60 wt.% (specimens 90fa; 80fa; 70fa, and 60fa, respectively). Strength values of the specimens containing an admixture of 40 wt.% cement (specimen 60fa) and the without ce- ment admixture (specimen 100fa-4) at the curing age of 28 days are comparable to those of specimen PC_04 based on 100 wt.% cement at w/b ratio = 0.4 in the absence of superplasticizer (Figure 4). If the content of cement ad- mixture is 10–30 wt.% (HCFA content is 70–90 wt.%), the compressive strength rises and passes through the maxi- mum at PC content of 20 wt.% (specimen 80fa in Fig- ure 4), where comp is 77 and 125 MPa at the curing age 28 and 100 days, respectively. With an increase in curing age to 100 days, the strength of specimens with a high fly ash content (speci- mens 70fa, 80fa, 90fa, and 100fa4) increases to a greater extent (1.3–1.6 times) compared to specimens with a high cement content (PC_04, 60fa, PC_025), for which the strength increases by 1.1–1.16 times (Figure 4). The ob- served rise in strength is the significant advantage of using fine HCFA as a basis for cementitious composite materials. Figure 4 Compressive strength of the composite specimens based on PC 42.5 N (PC_04 and PC_025), on fraction 4 (100fa-4), on HCFA–PC blends (60fa, 70fa, 80fa, and 90fa), and sample 80fa-SF containing 0.3% Melflux 5581F and 5% of silica fume added to the blend. Chimica Techno Acta 2022, vol. 9(4), No. 20229407 ARTICLE 5 of 7 Figure 5 Optical microscope images of the cured specimens at 100 days: Portland cement (a); 80% fr4 – 20% PC (b). A similar effect was observed by the authors of [4] when 18% of PC was replaced with Class C fly ash (CaO 36.56 wt.%) in self-consolidating concretes containing a polycarboxylate ether superplasticizer HRWR (admixture content, 1.28 wt.%). The specimens were obtained with a compressive strength close to that of specimens based 100 wt.% PC at curing age of 7 days and exceeding it by 3–6 MPa at the curing age of 28–90 days. As the ash con- tent increased to 36%, the strength increased even more. Unlike high-calcium fly ash, admixtures of fly ash with aluminosilicate composition (Class F) usually reduce early strength of cement-based composite materials [4, 25]. For example, the addition of Class F fly ash of 10–40% leads to a decrease in strength by 1.5–3 times at the curing age of 3–7 days and, with an increase to 70% FA, the strength decreased by 6–13 times. Thus, the factors for improving the strength of cement compositions in the early stages are the higher CaO content in fly ash, the decrease in the size of ash particles, and the addition of a superplasticizer, which facilitates their dispersion. It was previously established [14] that the main newly formed phases for the binder based 100% HCFA are ettringite 3CaOAl2O33CaSO432H2O, calcium carboalumi- nate hydrates Ca4Al2(OH)13(CO3)0.54H2O, Ca4Al2(OH)12CO35H2O and cryptocrystalline calcium hy- drosilicates. Since calcium aluminoferrite Ca2FexAlyO5 was actively involved in their formation, the ettringite and calcium carboaluminate phases are solid solutions due to the isomorphous replacement of Al3+ with Fe3+. The main source of silicates is the amorphous phase (glass). The contribution of glass transformation yielding cryptocrys- talline calcium hydrosilicates increases with curing time. The microstructure of the hardened sample obtained with the addition of HCFA fraction 4 (Figure 5) becomes thinner compared to the hardened Portland cement sam- ple and, consequently, finely mixed hydrate phases are formed, providing a higher strength of the composite material. Based on a blend of 80% HCFA – 20% PC at w/b = 0.25, the ultra-high strength specimens (80fa-SF) were obtained by increasing the concentration of Melflux 5581F to 0.3% and adding silica fume (SF) in an amount of 5%. Compressive strength of 80fa-SF specimens is 108 and 150 MPa at curing age 28 and 100 days, respectively (Figure 4). Adding the silica fume can improve properties of composite materials due to denser packing of particles and the pozzolanic reaction with Ca(OH)2 yielding addi- tional calcium hydrosilicates [15]. 4. Conclusions The factors of improving the strength of the composite materials based on high-calcium fly ash were investigated in this study. The effect of particle fineness on strength of the ce- mentless composite materials based on microspherical fractions of high-calcium fly ashes (HCFA) with total CaO content of ~40 wt.% was studied. It was found that for fly ash fractions having similar chemical and phase composi- tions, a decrease in the particle size from d90 30 m (frac- tion 3) to 10 m (fraction 4) increases compressive strength more than twofold: from 5.5–14 MPa to 11–36 MPa at curing age of 3–300 days. The effect of adding a superplasticizer was studied and it was found that the addition of 0.12% Melflux 5581F made it possible to reduce the w/b ratio to 0.25 and in- crease the strength by 2.3–2.5 times for the specimens based on fraction 3 – up to 14-32 MPa and by 2.2 times for the specimens based on fraction 4 – up to 24–78 MPa at the curing age of 3–300 days. The influence of adding PC 42.5 N on the enhance- ment of strength of the composite materials based on HCFA fraction 4 of in the presence of 0.12% Melflux 5581F at w/b ratio = 0.25 was studied in the range of 10–40% PC. It was found that the value of compressive strength has a maximum at 20% PC (80% HCFA), which is 77 and 125 MPa with the curing age of 28 and 100 days, respectively. On the basis of the composition 80%HCFA-20%PC, the ultra-high strength specimens were obtained with the ad- dition of 0.3% Melflux 5581F and 5% silica fume, which have a compressive strength of 108 and 150 MPa at the curing age of 28 and 100 days, respectively. Chimica Techno Acta 2022, vol. 9(4), No. 20229407 ARTICLE 6 of 7 Supplementary materials No supplementary data are available. Funding This work was conducted within the framework of the budget project No. 121031500198-3 for Institute of Chem- istry and Chemical Technology SB RAS. Acknowledgments This work was conducted using the equipment of Krasno- yarsk Regional Research Equipment Centre of SB RAS. The authors are grateful to E.V. Mazurova for obtaining SEM images. Author contributions Conceptualization: O.M.S., A.G.A. Data curation: O.M.S. Formal Analysis: O.M.S., L.A.S., A.G.A. Funding acquisition: O.M.S., L.A.S., A.G.A. Investigation: O.M.S., L.A.S., A.G.A. Methodology: O.M.S., L.A.S., A.G.A. Project administration: A.G.A. Resources: O.M.S., L.A.S., A.G.A. Software: O.M.S., L.A.S. Supervision: A.G.A. Validation: O.M.S., A.G.A. Visualization: O.M.S., L.A.S., A.G.A. Writing – original draft: O.M.S., A.G.A. Writing – review & editing: O.M.S. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Additional information Author IDs: Olga M. Sharonova, Scopus ID 6506111906; Leonide A. Solovyov, Scopus ID 6701367459; Alexander G. Anshits, Scopus ID 57200009289. Websites: Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology SB RAS, Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS", https://ksc.krasn.ru; Siberian Federal University, https://www.sfu-kras.ru. References 1. Blissett RS, Rowson NA. A review of the multi-component utilisation of coal fly ash. Fuel. 2012;97:1–23. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.024 2. Belviso C. State-of-the-art applications of fly ash from coal and biomass: A focus on zeolite synthesis processes and is- sue. Prog Energy Comb Sci. 2018;5:109–135. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2017.10.004 3. Snegirev VA, Yurk VM. The development of technology for production of zeolites from fly-ash from Troitskaya power plant. Chimi Techno Acta. 2021;8:20218111. doi:10.15826/chimtech.2021.8.1.11 4. Ahari RS, Erdem TK, Ramyar K. Permeability properties of self-consolidating concrete containing various supplementary cementitious materials. Constr Build Mater. 2015;79:326– 336. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.053 5. Pranav S, Aggarwal S, Yang E-H, Sarkar AK, Singh AP, Lahoti M. Alternative materials for wearing course of concrete pavements: A critical review. Constr Build Mater. 2020;236:117609. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117609 6. Rahul AV, Santhanam M, Meena H,Ghani Z. Mechanical char- acterization of 3D printable concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2019;227:116710. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116710 7. Donatello S, Fernández-Jimenez A, Palomo A. Very high vol- ume fly ash cements. Early age hydration study using Na2SO4 as an activator. J Am Ceram Soc. 2013;96:900–906. doi:10.1111/jace.12178 8. Sharonova OM, Solovyov LA, Oreshkina NA, Yumashev VV, Anshits AG. Composition of high-calcium fly ash middlings selectively sampled from ash collection facility and prospect of their utilization as component of cementing materials. Fuel Process Technol. 2010;91:573–581. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.01.003 9. Zhao Y, Zhang J, Tian C, Li H, Shao X, Zheng C. Mineralogy and chemical composition of high-calcium fly ashes and den- sity fractions from a coal-fired power plant in China. Energy Fuels. 2010;24:834–843. doi:10.1021/ef900947y 10. Sharonova OM, Kirilets VM, Yumashev VV, Solovyov LA, An- shits AG. Phase composition of high strength binding materi- al based on fine microspherical high-calcium fly ash. Constr Build Mater. 2019;216:525–530. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.201 11. Ilic M, Cheeseman C, Sollars C, Knight J. Mineralogy and mi- crostructure of sintered lignite coal fly ash. Fuel. 2003;82:331–336. doi:10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00272-7 12. Tishmack JK, Olek J, Diamond S, Sahu S. Characterization of pore solutions expressed from high-calcium fly-ash-water pastes. Fuel. 2001;80:815–819. doi:10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00160-5 13. Sharonova OM, Anshits NN, Fedorchak MA, Zhizhaev AM, Anshits AG. Characterization of ferrospheres recovered from high-calcium fly ash. Energy Fuels. 2015;29:5404–5414. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01618 14. Sharonova OM, Yumashev VV, Solovyov LA, Anshits AG. The fine high-calcium fly ash as the basis of composite cementing material. Mag Civ Eng, 2019;91:60–72. doi:10.18720/MCE.91.6 15. Li Z. Advanced concrete technology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New Jersey, USA; 2011. 506 p https://epdf.pub/advanced- concrete-technology.html 16. Yoshioka K, Tazawa EI, Kawai K, Enohata T. Adsorption char- acteristics of superplasticizers on cement component miner- als. Cem Concr Res. 2002;32:1507–1513. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00782-2 17. Alonso MM, Palacios M, Puertas F. Compatibility between polycarboxylate-based admixtures and blended-cement pastes. Cem Concr Compos. 2013;35:151–162. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.020 18. Solovyov LA. Full-profile refinement by derivative difference minimization research papers. J Appl Crystallogr, 2004;37:743–749. doi:10.1107/S0021889804015638 19. Fomenko EV, Yumashev VV, Kukhtetskiy SV, Zhizhaev AM, Anshits AG. Scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS) analysis of PM1-2 micro- spheres located in coal char particles with different morphol- ogies. Energy Fuels. 2020;34:8848–8856. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01345 https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=6506111906 https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=6701367459 https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57200009289 https://ksc.krasn.ru/ https://www.sfu-kras.ru/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.10.004 https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2021.8.1.11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.053 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117609 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116710 https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12178 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.01.003 https://doi.org/10.1021/ef900947y https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.201 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00272-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00160-5 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01618 https://doi.org/10.18720/MCE.91.6 https://epdf.pub/advanced-concrete-technology.html https://epdf.pub/advanced-concrete-technology.html https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00782-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.020 https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889804015638 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01345 Chimica Techno Acta 2022, vol. 9(4), No. 20229407 ARTICLE 7 of 7 20. Lothenbach B, Scrivener K, Hooton RD. Supplementary ce- mentitious materials. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41:1244–1256. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001 21. Yu J, Lu C, Leung CKY, Li G. Mechanical properties of green structural concrete with ultrahigh-volume fly ash. Constr Build Mater. 2017;147:510–518. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.188 22. Durdziński PT, Dunant CF, Haha MB, Scrivener KL. A new quantification method based on SEM-EDS to assess fly ash composition and study the reaction of its individual compo- nents in hydrating cement paste. Cem Concr Res. 2015;73:111–122. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.008 23. Fediuk R, Timokhin R, Mochalov A, Otsokov K, Lashina I. Performance properties of high-density impermeable ce- mentitious paste. J Mater Civ Eng. 2019;31:04019013. doi:10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002633 24. Ferrari L, Kaufmann J, Winnefeld F, Plank J. Multi-method approach to study influence of superplasticizers on cement suspensions. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41:1058–1066. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.010 25. Yang J, Su Y, He X, Tan H, Jiang Y, Zeng L, Strnadel B. Pore structure evaluation of cementing composites blended with coal by-products: Calcined coal gangue and coal fly ash. Fuel Process Technol. 2018;181:75–90. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.09.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.188 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.008 https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002633 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.09.013